Is Chelsea really the biggest?

[Whink]

Quote:
extremely close it looks  

Laidback,
Look with all due respect, do you have to post this attachment: http://forum.bearchive.com/files/298027-um1.jpg
To EVERY SINGLE post you make here?  It's not necessary.  You've now stored it countless times on the server here as a copy each and every time.

It's just not needed.  Yeah, we've seen it.  It's your avatar!  and yes, she looks great and I love her licking her lips...

But each time, I click on it hoping that yoou've attached a relevant picture (as you have often said) only to find the same damned attachment again and again.

and this IS a chelsea thread, so we're going to be hungry to see any attachments in hopes it might be some CC pic that's never been seen before.

Kind regards, nonetheless...

Whink
 

[ApesMa]

Quote:
"comfortability"? Is that like bouncebackability?

I would think "comfortability" is the extent to which something can be comforted.

Quote:
When last I hung out with Chelsea (4 months ago) she said they were still growing. She didn't say anything about getting them drained although I didn't specifically ask.

Thank you!  

[GoCubsGo]

Chelsea Charms in November 2001 from:
 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chelseacharms2  

Could you picture her being your Prom date in this dress ?

 





 

[Whink]

Oh hell yes, GoCubsGo, I could picture marrying her in that dress!

LOL

[Old_Chestnut]

As huge as she was then in that white sheath dress, I had to expand her somewhat over 20% linearly to bring that picture into line with the proportions she has now...  

[Whink]

 



Mon Dieu, Doux Jésus Seigneur!  Votre travail est très splendide et très réalistique!  Formidable!!  

[BarneyFife]

hahahahahahaha,I can't believe the side by sides Chelsea before and after pics.I mean this in a good way in the white dress I just can't see chelsea being that big.I have been a member for a long time on chelsea's site and the current pics of the christmas outfit don't seem to be nearly as big as the new proposed before and after in the white dress.I wish Chelsea would put on some of those old clothes just to see if she is actually that much bigger.The pics at the convention make her look massive but the new pics just shot don't seem as massive.  

[GoCubsGo]

Maxi vs. Chelsea in 2001

   

[Tiggo]

Great idea to have Chelsea pose in her older (2001) clothes!!

Someone suggest it to her!

I'm not a member of her site, but I have given generously to her the 3 times I've seen her in person.

She is really sweet and cute and of course, has the biggest tits that a mortal man can imagine......  

[Psf_79]

You know, once there was a time when we used to say, "her boobs are as big as her head!" when we referred to boobs we thought were big.

Now, when you describe the 'bigness' (biggity?) of Chelsea's boobs, you have to say they're twice as big as her head. Chelsea has re-defined the meaning of 'big'.

Look at that pic with Rhiannon in it. If Rhiannon has 4000+cc's in each implant, how much does Chelsea have nowadays? 10000cc's? I think I'm gonna faint...  

[Hentaibee]

hmm. As a fan of boob volume...I'd estimate Miss Charms has at least around 8000 - 8500 CC now...? anyone else?

[andrat2000]

If you believe on what she said some weeks ago on her message board, where she referred her boobs as '30 pound sacks'. Then again with here 2 year old FAQ where she says her breasts are 26 pounds apiece, I would say the 30 pounds apiece sounds feasible compared to here 2 year old informations. This would mean she has about 13000 - 13500 ccm apiece of breast now.

[Hentaibee]

(on the other hand, they absolutely look that big, but Chelsea isnt supertall, so its hard to compare ).

anyway. It just came to my mind that asking if she is the biggest is really pointless, because she IS the biggest for now and some time to come, and maybe ever.

yaaaaay for Chelsea Charms' Counting Classically Cleavageish Cyberhuge Chest
(say that 10 times in a row now)

[Whink]

I almost faint every time I look at her and start figuring that our also...

I believe it's because all the blood is rushing to my other head.  

 

[Hentaibee]

your other head... hahahaha. hilarious !
many men only think with their other head, then, right ?

[Whink]

Quote:
many men only think with their other head, then, right ?

Trudat.  And it's been the source of most of our problems for many many years!!

 

[Old_Chestnut]

from BarneyFife:

Quote:
 hahahahahahaha,I can't believe the side by sides Chelsea before and after pics.I mean this in a good way in the white dress I just can't see chelsea being that big.

     Well, Barney, I'll tell you how I arrived at that estimate.  I compared a linear measurement across one of CC's breasts to the size of her head (from hairline to chin, which I'm assuming hasn't changed in four years) in both that Nov. 2001 pic and one from Aug. 2004, choosing pictures where she was not too close to the camera to reduce the amount of lensing distortion (those images of her in the lace top do have serious distortion -- not that I mind   ).  I found that the ratio of corresponding breast to head lengths had increased by about 20-24% during that time (I checked some of the other 2004 pix to estimate the uncertainty...).  So I feel I can say with some confidence that her bosom is now somewhere close to the size I morphed it to in the 2001 photo (though it certainly doesn't sit that high on her torso...).from Hentaibee:

Quote:
hmm. As a fan of boob volume...I'd estimate Miss Charms has at least around 8000 - 8500 CC now...? anyone else?  

      OK, we know that breasts aren't spherical, so the volumes don't actually increase with the third power of their linear dimensions.  My own estimate for morphing purposes is more like (linear dimension)^2.5 .  That would suggest that, between 2001 and 2004, her breast volume had increased by 60-70% overall (and we know that there were variations during that interval).While I was making that last morph, I was guessing that CC had been around 5000 cc each at the time, so that would bring her to around 8000-8500 cc, just as HB says.   Then I tried another estimate from one of the other recent photos.  In this attached pic, we don't have her full figure, but I estimate that CC would stand about 9-1/2" high, to scale.  [Oh well, at least when I was working with this pic...]  I calculated the diameters of spheres with volumes of 8000, 12000, and 20000 cc and marked them in the photo to the same scale.  (There is perhaps a 10% uncertainty in the proper size of those circles.)  Again, breasts aren't true spheres, but there is at least a rough guide here.  Now I'm thinking andrat2000's figure of 13,000 cc isn't so wild:  if CC was closer to 7500 cc in that 2001 pic (using her old newsletter info), a 60-70% volume increase would now put her up in the 12,000-12,800 cc range!     So I'm thinking that Chelsea really is somewhere upward of 10,000 cc and may well be approaching 11-12,000!     We can also see if the weight figure makes sense.  In metric, 26 pounds is equivalent to a mass of 11.8 kilos.  Water has a density of 1 kg./1000 cc, fat is about 0.92 kg./1000 cc, and polypropylene string is somewhere around 0.35 kg./1000 cc. [CRC Handbook].  I estimate that CC's own original breast tissue was somewhere around 700-900 cc each (she's about 5'2" and says she started out as a DD-cup), the implants started out around 1200-1500 cc each (judging from the earliest pics from 2000), and the rest of the volume in each breast is serous fluid or otherwise has a density about that of water.  For a current volume of 8000 cc, that would give a mass estimate of  around 0.75 kg. (fat) + 0.5 kg. (PP) + 6 kg. (water), for a total of 7.25 kg. or 16 pounds each.  If her volume were more like 12,000 cc, the mass of water increases to about 10 kg., giving a total of 11.25 kg. or 25 pounds each.  [Feel free to adjust these estimates to your own liking...]I do wonder whether that weight figure of 26 pounds is really for each breast or her entire bosom, but we'd need better measurement information to resolve this...  [It's also worth noting, BTW, that the average density of her breasts is steadily approaching that of just water, mostly eliminating whatever weight advantage the polypropylene was originally intended to provide...]Say, would someone mind telling me how you get paragraph breaks to work on this board?

[tandoori]

any idea of the bust measurment of Miss Charm ?
70 inches ? 80 ?
can't imagine beyond that !!!
And is there any recent picture of measuring herself ?

[Whink]

Thanks, Chest-nut!  I didn't have that picture in my CC collection!!  

[BarneyFife]

Great job Old Chestnut, a genius is among us.Gee I wish Chelsea would model her old clothes now to see the difference.I know your calculations are the best you could do but nothing like the real thing modeling the clothes.From chelsea's new video where Crystal Gunns is wearing chelsea's old clothes it is very possible Chelsea's figure has grown to those proportions. Chelsea most recent picks,the christmas picks to me she doesn't look as large. I wish Ms Charms could resolve this and do another clothes video to settle it.The above pic you showed Chelsea is looking huge there compared to everyone else. I wonder if the other models egos shrink since they are much bigger than the average gal walking the streets but when chelsea comes by it is like they belong in training bras.  

[Feral]

Quote:
Old_Chestnut:
I do wonder whether that weight figure of 26 pounds is really for each breast or her entire bosom, but we'd need better measurement information to resolve this...  

I did wonder this as well, but she does specifically say so on her site that it is apiece. So, I'm guessing she'd be a natural 105-115 pounds without them. I can't imagine how she can comfortably deal with ~55% of her body weight on her chest. You'd think her shoulders would be wore out from her bra straps. Back during my school days, I remember how a Eastpak full of books would wear me out after a long day. I'm glad Chelsea bears her burden so well.

[Whink]

She now says they are 30 lbs each, so that's 60 pounds of tit.

But she has put on weight elsewhere as well...I'd say she's about 120 now, based on her height and add 60 lbs for a total of 180.

Boggles the mind.  Must be causing mobility issues by now.

[Old_Chestnut]

from Whink:

Quote:
 She now says they are 30 lbs each, so that's 60 pounds of tit.  But she has put on weight elsewhere as well...I'd say she's about 120 now, based on her height and add 60 lbs for a total of 180.  

   Yes, in comparing the earliest photos from 2000 with recent ones, I'd guessed that the rest of CC's body was 10-15 pounds heavier nowadays (that isn't so much for someone still reaching physical maturity, given that she was around 20 in 2000); I've been estimating that the rest of her body was about 125 (but who am I to contradict her?  ).  If her breasts really are about 30 pounds (13.6 kg.) each now, by my aforesaid analysis, that really would put her breast volume up around 14,000 cc each!  (I think that weight may be rounded off, but we'll go with it for now.  But we would insist on greater precision henceforth...   )I've marked the approximate locations of the centers of mass of her breasts, the rest of her body, and overall on the one reasonably recent full-figure side view photo I could find of Chelsea.  I know this one doesn't show her at her current size, but it will give you the idea:  even if her bosom does constitute about 30-35% of her total body mass, her center of gravity is still within her torso so far (maintaining balance is a challenge, but not a physical unlikelihood...).  I'd say that CC will be in considerable equilibration difficulties (in terms of walking or even standing) if her breasts reach a total weight upward of 45-50 pounds (20.5-22.5 kg.).  By then, she'd be at a volume in the neighborhood of 22,000 cc each!  To attempt an answer to the question raised by tandoori, it's possible to make a rough estimate of her current bust measurement from the photos also.  Using her standing, full-figure photo, with her given height of 62", the reference I've been using for her hairline-to-chin distance then comes out to be about 8-1/4" (that leads to a result that CC is about 7-1/2 heads high, which is credible).  That can then be used to set up scale bars for photos, as shown.  None of these is ideal for the task of getting precise measurements because of perspective effects (and the middle pic clearly shows the difference between her "drained" and more recent "full" dimensions), but I would say roughly that the distance along her side from her back to the front surface of her bosom is 15 to 16-1/2", across her bosom is 19-20", and across her back is about 12".  This is sort of a crude estimate, but it leads to a bust measurement somewhere is the range of 62-65" (158-165 cm.).      (This also gives an estimate for her "underbust" measurement somewhere around 28-30", which would make her about a 34T...)  To return to tandoori's remark, I suspect Chelsea would have a tough time of walking or standing before she reached 70", given the relatively small size of her torso...  Again, feel free to adjust these estimates as you see fit.  I do enjoy the idea of a woman with a bust size larger than her height...      

[Old_Chestnut]

from BarneyFife:
 

Quote:
 I know your calculations are the best you could do but nothing like the real thing modeling the clothes.

       You're quite right:  theoretical analysis is all very well, but the world must also be investigated through direct observation and measurement...     (As the philosophers say, Nature is the final arbiter.)  

[Hentaibee]

gee....aren't we turning Chelsea boos into a math class here?
hahaha.
 

[Old_Chestnut]

    Since people here were asking numerical questions, a quantitative analysis seemed to be called for.  I know all that was a bit long, but I figured that explaining how I arrived at my estimates would serve two purposes:  (1) so that I wouldn't just be pulling numbers out of the air (which tends to lead to unnecessary arguments) and to see what might be learned from the photos and (2) so that anyone else could see where I got my numbers and could see what they came up with by using other values.  Anyway, I'm done for now...  

[BarneyFife]

I bet chelsea would be honored at your hard work old Chestnut knowing somebody is calculating all this with formulas.Great job once again.  

[DruulEmpire]

Hohhh ... !  Leeeee ... !  Fuhhh-ck ... !

[**DONOTDELETE**]

I think at this point it really is safe to say Chelsea is many feet ahead of the rest at this point, and noone is going to catch her anytime soon in the breastsize race.  

[Feral]

Great posts Old_Chestnut, thanks for the analysis. I'd have to say a woman who's breasts measure more inches then her height and are over a third of her body weightare certainly dazzling to the mind.

[Hentaibee]

Quote:
I think at this point it really is safe to say Chelsea is many feet ahead of the rest at this point, and noone is going to catch her anytime soon in the breastsize race.  

You are our winner for most obvious post of 2005 so far :-)
 

[GoCubsGo]

Quote:
Maxi vs. Chelsea in 2001

Battle of the Huge Boobs
 

 

 

[Demolition_Man]

Now that's a fight I WOULD try to break up!    

[Whink]

Reallly?  Not me!  I'd try to get in the middle of it and let them beat the daylights out of me with those boobs!

 

[GoCubsGo]