|
|
|
ninkasi
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2005, 08:03:42 PM » |
|
An honorable effort with a thoughtful list of problems found in submitted pics. I would probably add one more: No pic submitted. I roll my eyes when I see the request for a morph of Ms. _________ _______, and the morpher is expected to go find the pic himself.
But any list just might be futile. We can only hope that potential requesters will find this thread.
Thank you for your effort.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rtpoe
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2005, 09:38:57 PM » |
|
For those who can't figure it out from the illustration:
1. Pics must be properly exposed.
2. Pics must be of sufficient resolution.
3. Pics must be large enough.
4. Pics must have enough space to work in.
5. Pics must be in focus.
rtpoe
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
rtpoe
JOIN THE BEA
...It's May!
The lusty month of May!
That darling month when
ev'ryone throws self-control away.
It's time to do a wretched thing or two,
And try to make each precious day
One you'll always rue!
Alan J. Lerner, "The Lusty Month of May"
|
|
|
TheHerald
K Cup
Posts: 3877
Ink & Paint Club Outcast
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2005, 02:13:24 AM » |
|
One more you missed, but wonderful what you have.. 6. Subject must be age 18 or over. I was tempted to add.. 7. Request should be on-topic. ..but I won't.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Thank you for your patience as I indulge my need to share.
|
|
|
|
MunchWolf
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2005, 06:57:28 AM » |
|
8. Picture must include girl's breast area
unless it's a face swap .. then must include face ... and not pixilated ...
-Munch "9. picture must include girl" Wolf
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Angelus
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2005, 09:25:39 AM » |
|
Can I add "Subject must be relatively good looking?"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Angelusx
G Cup
Posts: 1501
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2005, 10:02:27 AM » |
|
that's a tricky one because beauty is subjective, but let's put it this way if someone makes a "morph my girlfriend" thread and no one replies and they've met all other conditions, they shouldn't ask why its not been done or if someone will do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ZoD
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2005, 10:20:50 AM » |
|
Essentially, a bit of etiquette would come in useful for some of the requests.
They ask and the morpher is at their leisure whether or not to use that material.
I dislike the "hour waiter's", who wait a tiny amount of time and then complain about "300 views and no reply!"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
EVERYONE LOVES TIFA!!!!!!
«Zoneofdecay on the outside, tasty on the inside.»
|
|
|
Fuzzy
E Cup
Posts: 896
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2005, 08:06:05 PM » |
|
Quote:
8. Picture must include girl's breast area
That pretty much comes under "must have enough room for breasts..." It's a more extreme subset of it, but it's still there.
Fuzzy |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Archangel_Dreadnought
F Cup
Posts: 1287
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2005, 08:17:06 PM » |
|
Quote:
6. Subject must be age 18 or over.
Visibly age 18 or over. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Zorro
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2005, 08:25:38 PM » |
|
Way to go Fuzzy! Diplomatic but to the point.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tsunami2k
F Cup
Posts: 1132
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2005, 09:56:43 PM » |
|
also, they could put [Req] in the title of the thread but, hey... we already know it's a request forum lol. good point btw fuzzy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Amy
inactive
E Cup
Posts: 503
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2005, 09:32:26 PM » |
|
I have noticed something alot of times that do help, and well, it is something I myself find 'stupid' for people to do also, but some people I do not understand. And that is, if the rest of you morph artists feel the same as Magic,
"No Morphs of women with heads chopped Off, or faces blurred."
IF you wish a private morph as I myself has done a few times with a few nice and trusted artists here, do again as Magic said, 'send a private morph via PM and e-mail'.
Other then that I must admit as a woman myself, I still do not understand these other women at times who want to have their breasts all exposed BUT have their faces blurred out, oh I hear it is so I cannot be known, and I always thing IF you do not wish to be known, why are you into getting bigger rbeasts anyway, now for sure, heck, THAT is a way not to be known, to go from a flat chest to some mellons, I am sure no male nor female like myself would notice that. (sarcasim, but well you all understand, I like Magic and I hope the other artists do not understand nor feel myself respected to good with that type of request) I know some of you have morphed requests of girls without heads and blurred faces, but still, I believe you all artists should maybe do as Magic does and says, again "No face/No head = No Morph"
~Amy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ZoD
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 25, 2005, 05:27:17 PM » |
|
I blurred once (ex gf) and its a shame, because she is really quite pretty.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
EVERYONE LOVES TIFA!!!!!!
«Zoneofdecay on the outside, tasty on the inside.»
|
|
|
Amy
inactive
E Cup
Posts: 503
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 25, 2005, 08:14:52 PM » |
|
Quote:
I blurred once (ex gf) and its a shame, because she is really quite pretty.
Not to sound like a stick in the mud, and this is not really the place t start talking about anyone's Ex, more so a place for ideas on rules to make 'all' requests good for everyone that are posted and requested....
BUT I am a stick for yes, women's rights, for everyone's rights really, but it does turn me to at times see women get the low end, and I just think a blurred face, as you admitted more or less in your reply is a woman that does not wish to be added to this place and morphed in anyway. (Besides, I am sure, ex or not if anyone wishes to be morphed they would have their own log in and ask for it as many couples here do private or not.)
Again the 'blurred' or no face thing is just a thing I feel is like it is exactly on TV, you know when they blurr the faces of people on TV when those people will not 'allow' themselfs to be filmed, same thing holds true for images as well.
Anyway that is just what I think and believe and it is also against the law, not in a huge way, but dependible on 'how' it is used, and how far the person in image will take it, it is still against the law, so rule of thumb always, IF the face is blurred, hey, they do not wish to be a part of it.
Again just a stick in the mud some may say for rights, but glad to see most also thing so, as it did come from Magic to start with, and I do agree with him
"Blurred or No face, this woman does not wish to be a part of it therefore, is out as far as how far many if any really with the right heart and mind should take it."
Again just an opinion, but in that opinion 80% of the time, the law is also along side that opinion as well.
~Amy |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sheber
U Cup
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 25, 2005, 09:44:24 PM » |
|
I see your point, but you are making gross assumptions about people you do not know. Hell, you can even get yourself into sticky situations making assumptions about people you do know. Commonsense is the rule, something that is difficult to enforce even with the strictest of laws. Just ask the government.
Case in point: The blurred faces at Top Heavy. I believe the obstructed facial features are there to protect the model's anonymity. That is, if a bona fide representative of the model posted them in the first place. Again, I'd hesitate to make assumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[Rent this space]
|
|
|
|
MunchWolf
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 25, 2005, 09:53:10 PM » |
|
I think Amy has a good point ...
I don't think the rule applies to all cases ... but it would apply to most here
-Munch "Ie. If you're going through the effort of removing someone else's face before posting here, maybe you should think twice about posting" Wolf
ps: kinda of goes along with my rule, if you feel the need to state a picture is of someone of age, maybe you should think twice about posting it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Blax12
M Cup
Posts: 4767
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 28, 2005, 08:25:09 AM » |
|
I agree: I don't like blured faces and please, avoid titles like "morph request". Put a name in the title, or anything else to recognize it.
Blax12
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mysterymorpher
inactive
C Cup
Posts: 121
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2005, 09:12:19 AM » |
|
Adding my two cents, I don't do private morphs at all because my experience tells me people just cannot follow directions. Assuming for a minute that they can however, these would be my rules for private morphs (and I understand that not all of you would agree since some here have fetishes that are applicable)....
1. No morphs of grannies or other unattractive women with torpedo tits down to their waist.
2. Black clothing is generally bad for morphs (few exceptions). The more vivid the color, the better morph potential.
3. Pictures with multiple persons where you're expected to just ignore, or crop out one person, while you morph the other... not good. This is art and the subject of your morph should be the focus.
4. Morph requests should be of women with small to medium breasts. Nothing that gets on my nerves more than when somebody morphs a pic of Sarenna Lee or Sable or somebody.... she's already got HUGE tits!
5. No fat chicks. If you're not sure whether your morph subject is fat or not, THEN SHE IS. If you have to wonder, then it's not worth sending it.
6. No trannies.
7. The subject should be prominent in the frame. The most common mistake photographers make is taking the photo from too far away. Take two steps forward when you snap the pic.
8. If you email me EVEN ONCE asking me when your morph is going to be done, you've just guaranteed I won't finish it. I'm doing you a favor. Respect it.
And all of the rules the others mentioned... i reserve the right to change or add to these at any time.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My last girlfriend broke up with me by fax. It was a seven page fax, the first page's just got a big 'F' on it... I don't like where this is going...
|
|
|
auto_reply
Administrator
I Cup
Posts: 2749
|
|
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2005, 04:27:39 PM » |
|
Here is a quote from a recent dialog on the subject that I think will benefit anyone bothering to read this thread: Quote:
Two things we are sure of, the age of people with celebrity and the age of adult models published in the united states, because that is information is common knowledge or is readily available. Just because you say that somone is old enough (or that you know them) doesn't mean anyone else is convinced. Knowing this, and that **19**-**18**-photobucket-type content is prohibited and that you personally haven't assumed responsibility or asserted copyright on any of the photographs (unlike two young people currently sharing their own photos on the forums), and are at least aware of our people of minority age rules, that you continue to post these same pictures.
One of three things must happen: 1) You start posting people clearly old enough to be here (and by clearly I mean that anyone looking at the photograph would go "yes, there is no doubt in mind that she is old enough"), 2) You assert copyright and accept responsibility for your own photographs (which still won't guarantee that they stay on the forum if there is any question to number one), or 3) you stop posting **19**-**18**-photobucket-type content all together. There is one more option, and that is when I'm left with no other option than to take away your ability to participate in the forums.
I hope that someone finds this useful. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*You have reached the Automated Moderation System. In the event of an actual breast expansion emergency, the Attention Signal you just heard would have been followed by official information, news or instructions.*
Xenocrates:
"I have often repented speaking, but never of holding my tongue."
|
|
|
|
Theo
|
|
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2005, 05:24:37 PM » |
|
Quote:
5. No fat chicks. If you're not sure whether your morph subject is fat or not, THEN SHE IS. If you have to wonder, then it's not worth sending it.
How are you defining fat? Just curious. My gf is fat to some, but not to me. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You certainly have an ironic name. Just saying. - gOOber in Atheism Topic about my User Name
|
|
|
marioz988
inactive
A Cup
Posts: 13
|
|
« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2005, 04:58:33 AM » |
|
looks good as it is !!!!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kupsyza
inactive
D Cup
Posts: 405
|
|
« Reply #22 on: November 05, 2005, 09:53:15 PM » |
|
what's a trannie?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MasterDragonfly
S Cup
Posts: 7768
sponsor of collared_cherri's 1000cc implants
|
|
« Reply #23 on: November 05, 2005, 10:08:55 PM » |
|
transvestite/transexual/transgender
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
solvegas
R Cup
Posts: 7377
|
|
« Reply #24 on: November 05, 2005, 11:01:53 PM » |
|
Gee , I thought a tranny was the low gear on a manual truck transmision ....   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
JustAskin
inactive
A Cup
Posts: 18
|
|
« Reply #26 on: January 05, 2006, 03:06:16 AM » |
|
I'm 51 years old. Does that make me a "drooping granny?" I think not.
Basically, my bra size and my age are the same... except I have to squeeze my all natural boobs into a 48DDD because that's the biggest garment available in my neighborhood. And yes, I have a few extra pounds. I guess this means I wouldn't qualify for enhancement under your criteria list.
A well endowed woman is first and foremost a capable woman. As to what she's capable of - that is the artist's interpretation.
I was stunned when someone suggested I should request a morph but thrilled when I saw myself "enhanced." Fortunately, not everyone shares your list of preferences.
Appreciatively,
Just Askin
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mysterymorpher
inactive
C Cup
Posts: 121
|
|
« Reply #27 on: January 11, 2006, 11:50:02 PM » |
|
I'm just saying I'm not into fat chicks, so I don't do their morphs. I'm defining fat as morbidly obese... I'm not talking about some of our more finely rounded models, Taylor, Nadine, etc... we can all agree these girls got some junk in the trunk, but we wouldn't have it any other way.
In reference to grannies, you'll notice I didn't say anything about age, but more with regard to appearance. If you're sexy, great. But if you're drooping torpedo tits to your waist and your skin is so wrinkled you look like a shaved Shar Pei, then no I won't do it. Primarily just because looking at a photo like that for hours would make me want to throw up.
My point basically is the morphing itself is an art, and the subject of the morph should reflect the artistry of it. I'm not the kind of guy who believes in putting a bitchin' paint job on a dump truck.
Insensitive perhaps, but it's my effort so my prerogative.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My last girlfriend broke up with me by fax. It was a seven page fax, the first page's just got a big 'F' on it... I don't like where this is going...
|
|
|
Stretcherr
in memoriam
F Cup
Posts: 1424
|
|
« Reply #28 on: January 17, 2006, 12:55:12 PM » |
|
well i dig you, sweetie!! send your pics my way, these youngins haven't learned to appreciate a woman like you yet. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JustAskin
inactive
A Cup
Posts: 18
|
|
« Reply #29 on: January 18, 2006, 04:33:24 AM » |
|
Your reply wasn't all that bad.
The artistry is not in question.
Just Askin... who ain't no granny
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Digital_Spider
B Cup
Posts: 51
|
|
« Reply #30 on: July 22, 2006, 04:29:35 AM » |
|
I understand and personally like seeing less endowed/smaller chested women morphed and enhanced but as to why alot of guys morph women that are already and naturally a thing of perfection...I have no idea. To each and his own i guess. When i think of morphing, i look at it like pictures can be morphed up, morphed down, maybe take a a-cup and turn her into an amazing 38-FF. Perhaps even taking a 38-FF and taking her down to a 38 DD. Its an artform. But i think there should be a rule about morphing down, is it allowed? is it not allowed? I asked for someone to morph down this picture i had and people got wound up like a they were bunch of roman catholics and i had just insulted the pope.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Digital_Spider
B Cup
Posts: 51
|
|
« Reply #31 on: July 22, 2006, 04:42:04 AM » |
|
These people are their orthodox bullshit, "ah she has to be a certain weight, no big girls", she has to be this, she has to be that, why are you asking to morph down" BLAH!...Where one person might not fufill a request theres another one that will glady do it, i guess we seem to forget that.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MunchWolf
|
|
« Reply #32 on: July 23, 2006, 03:39:57 AM » |
|
Eh ... the person who got the most wound up was you ...
but there is a basic concept here you are missing ... if you want a furry morph, go to a furry site ... if you want a body inflation morph, go the a body inflation site ... want a giantess morph, go to a giantess site ... this happens to be the breast EXPANSION archive, so it just makes sense that this would be the perfect place for requests about morphs for bigger breasts ...
-Munch "expecting frothy rebuttal that doesn't address anything I've said in 3...2...1..." Wolf
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
HamsterGal
inactive
F Cup
Posts: 1162
|
|
« Reply #33 on: July 23, 2006, 05:31:13 PM » |
|
Playing a little devil's advocate here....
Perhaps the more unusual requests are being made simply because this is the site that has the best morphers around. Just my theory. Folks see what kind of art is produced, and hope that someone with a high level of skill can help them get the image they want.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Chievous Industries Keeper of Rocket Pants |
|
|
Tenacious_BE
inactive
E Cup
Posts: 724
|
|
« Reply #34 on: July 23, 2006, 05:34:18 PM » |
|
Ooooooo nice! Do another backflip! Go MONKEY GO
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
