Breast Expansion Archive Forum

Discussions => General Discussion => Topic started by: RobertaFan on June 12, 2001, 06:15:00 PM

Title: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RobertaFan on June 12, 2001, 06:15:00 PM
For anyone in the San Francisco Bay Area:

 

Chelsea Charms is performing at the Market Street Cinema this week. Not sure of the exact dates, but if you are in town during the week or this coming weekend, she'll be shakin' her stuff inside that front door on Market Street. I just might show up just to see if they really are bigger than 10 gallon drums......

RobertaFan

[ June 12, 2001: Message edited by: RobertaFan ]

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 12, 2001, 11:02:00 PM
She was there from June 6 - 12.  I saw both her and Sable Holiday at Market Street Cinema on Sunday June 10th.

Chelsea's simply amazing.  I think her next tour stop is in New York City in July.  Not sure where Sable is headed next but it was incredible seeing both of them together!

capper

[ June 12, 2001: Message edited by: capper ]

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 12, 2001, 11:21:00 PM
Oh i second that..

I came to MSC just becuase of that Combo ( went Monday). I have to amit that Chelsea's tits are more arrousing simply becuase they are so soft and almost natural like. However, having both in your face is just great  

The only sad thing is how the other dancers try and keep you from getting far into the club to see your favorate dancers.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on July 15, 2001, 07:31:00 AM
Melonie Charm posted a couple of pictures and an informative post about a recent visit of hers to NYC Flashdancers to see Chelsea.  She posted a couple of pics of her and Chelsea together that I think are awesome at both http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/meloniecharm  and http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/chelseacharms  

She said she will also have some more pics on her site http://www.meloniecharm.com

Did anyone have the incredibly good fortune to happen to bump into Mel at the club while seeing Chelsea?

capper

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Peter on July 15, 2001, 11:20:00 AM
Capper, I was there on Friday the 13th. Chelsea was doing her show and at some point I saw this woman who looked too old to be a house girl but big enough to have been a feature in the past. When watching Chelsea live, I might be in a daze and not thinking straight because I didn't immediately know who this other woman was but she was standing by the steps to the stage and I was wondering what in the world she's doing because it looked as if she was going to come up onto the stage. At that moment, the DJ said it was Chelsea's sister, but never named her as Melonie. She came on the stage for a moment, hugged Chelsea, and then stepped down, as Chelsea continued on with her typically sensational show. Melonie, for her age, is as good as they come, but there is only one Chelsea. She is in her own league at the top.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on July 16, 2001, 07:48:00 AM
Peterh,

Thanks for sharing.  I agree that Chelsea is awesome: I have seen her perform and gotten lapdances from her on three separate occasions at Market Street Cinema - she is great.

But Melonie's awesome too, and I've never had the good fortune to see her perform!  Probably because she's based on the east coast and I am in California.  So I definitely envy you for having had the opportunity to see her in person.

capper

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Peter on July 15, 2001, 09:21:00 PM
"I agree that Chelsea is awesome: I have seen her perform and gotten lapdances from her on three separate occasions at Market Street Cinema - she is great."

Capper, at Flashdancers in N.Y., the feature star is not allowed to do lapdances inside their place. I'm curious how many minutes the lapdance was, how much it cost, etc. I ask because, to make a long story short, the next time Chelsea comes to N.Y., I'll be getting a private dance from her, away from the club. I'd like to compare some notes with you if you're willing. If you'd feel better about it doing it by e-mail, I don't know your's but I can be reached at petersparadise1@hotmail.com

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on July 22, 2001, 08:25:00 PM
With the popularity she has I cannot work out why Chelsea Charms hasn't got a plethera of Video's out for sale. Any big boob fanatic is going to snap them up without hesitation, yet after nearly two years I can only recall three available 1. Debut 2. Changing Video 3. T&A 2000. Let's hope there is a couple in the pipeline.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Champy on July 23, 2001, 07:39:00 AM
Amen to THAT!!

Champy  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DTM on July 23, 2001, 01:44:00 PM
I would also like to see more of Chelsea. I think she is so busy touring that there is not time to arrange it. I can't even be sure she answers her own emails anymore. Last time I wrote her I got 2 reply's from 2 different address's.. What really sucks is she lives by me somewhere in Minnesota but never dances here that I know of...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JustMeMike on July 23, 2001, 02:22:00 PM
The purpose of a feature dancer doing a video is to increase her fan base so she can command higher performance fees from the club owners because the clubs she appears at have full houses.

Given that premise, I emailed Chelsea asking for a screener copy of her second tape. Not even a reply. Totally disinterested. For the cost of a blank cassette and about $3.60 US postage.

Her first tape, some one lent it to me, so I could do the review, and the T & A 2000 was sent to me by Minka, who was smart enough to see the upside of a favorable review.

If someone has Chelsea's second tape, I'd like to borrow it, for a review. What's in it for you?

How about an Original BOOB CRUISE 2000 video, factory fresh from SCORE. Never even opened.

This is not a trade. I will return your tape and send you the Boob Cruise 2000 video for you to keep.

Contact me by email thank you.

JustMeMike  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rev_Monsoon on July 24, 2001, 06:05:00 PM
I've already e-mailed you about this, but the tape should be in the mail early tomorrow morning (Wed 7/24).  

Be well,

Rev. Monsoon  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JustMeMike on July 25, 2001, 02:28:00 AM
Ok - thanks to The Rev. Dr. Monsoon, Chelsea Charms video shall be reviewed in the next ALSO ON VIDEO which shall appear in R & D's August 5th issue.

JustMeMike  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on July 25, 2001, 08:05:00 PM
Chelsea's video collection is sparse indeed.  She could put one out every month and it might come close!  On a positive note; however, even though it's going to be late CC should have a new one in the can for release in August or September.  Keep your fingers crossed.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on August 30, 2001, 04:46:00 AM
Check out the latest pics in her Yahoo Club:
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/chelseacharms

DAMN !!!!  She looks incredible in her orange bikini top !  

She is coming to Chicago in a couple of weeks - I am counting the days.......

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on August 30, 2001, 08:44:00 AM
Anyone know when more of her pics from the Fan Fair in Vegas will be posted ??
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 30, 2001, 11:53:00 AM
i am registered with yahoo CLUBS, but i cannot access this club.  why is this?  i've tried searching for it, but it never comes up in my search results.  PLEASE HELP!  i wanna see these unreal photos! thanks.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: cvs1999 on August 30, 2001, 04:51:00 PM
What's up GO Cubs GO

When Chelsea comes to Chicago a few of my friends and I are also going. Would you care to join us. The more people the more fun.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 30, 2001, 04:57:00 PM
Hi, try copying/pasting the URL or type it directly into your browser. It works for me.
By the way, I´ve been collecting Chelsea pics since she was "small" and I am quite worried about the size of her breasts. She is reaching a critical point. Does she have enough skin? What if she grows even bigger?
btboy
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on August 30, 2001, 05:32:00 PM
Don't be worried -- BE happy! Here's what she'll look like next year...

 


maybe.

[ August 30, 2001: Message edited by: steveo ]

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 30, 2001, 08:00:00 PM
Often share your worries.  Someday, if her growth dosn't stop, she'll have some of the String removed.  What if Chelsea is tired of those unbelievable breasts and decides to settle for just magnificent or even remarkable.  I cannot bear the thought of CC going all the way down to outstanding.  
.........................................................................................  Enough of my neurotic fears. I think we should nominate Ms. Charms for honarary mascot of the BEA as being the first good example of true BE via artificial intervention.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on August 31, 2001, 04:32:00 AM
Hello cvs1999,  I am going to be at the Admiral on Monday September 10th at 9pm.  I will be easy to find - look for the guy sitting in front row with glazed look in his eyes and jaw all the way down to the ground.......  I basically described every guy who will be there that night  :-)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 31, 2001, 07:06:00 AM
AHH!  this is very frustating.  i've tried copying/pasting the url, and typing it into my browser, but to no avail.  it says i've reached a restricted area.  why is this?  any more suggestions?  please help, i wanna see CHELSEA!!!  thanks!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tman on September 01, 2001, 03:24:00 AM
Have you tried to log in first?...

Tman

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: dev on September 01, 2001, 04:08:00 AM
If you log in with a yahoo mail account and don't log out you can browse to the site normally (without pasting the URL). But you will have to join any club in which you wish to see the gallery ('photos').
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on September 01, 2001, 06:26:00 PM
Thanks steveo. Your pic is great. I´ll try to BE happy.
Long live Chelsea!!!
btboy
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: NotElvis on September 01, 2001, 06:48:00 PM
Relax.  It is my unprofessional medical opinion that Chelsea's breasts will not tear, break, fall off, explode, or whatever.

Yes, they've been growing.  They will not do so ad infinitum.

Consider though: the amount of growth since she got her string implants, this has taken two years to happen.  That's really gradual.

I think there was far more damage to be done when she first got the string implants.  I know she had regular implants before, but her breasts weren't nearly as big, if I recall right, as she was when she first got the string, and that was an OVERNIGHT change.  Far more traumatizing/potentially damaging.

Since the growth now occurring is gradual, her skin and other tissues have time to adapt and accomodate.

Think of some of the more dramatic breast growth occurrences of women who are pregnant.  Percentage-wise, they gain more breast tissue in 9 months than Chelsea has in 2 years (proportionally, not in absolute volume).

Didn't someone post not to long ago about a woman who literally gained 3 lbs in her breasts overnight, and over 40 lbs in them during her pregnancy?  She wound up with some difficulties related to that, but her breasts didn't wind up actually exploding, and this is FAR more growth than Chelsea has experienced.

I'd say there isn't much to worry about aside from Chelsea either becoming tired of lugging them around, or tired of not being able to go out and do normal things without causing disruptions (what's it like for her to go grocery shopping, or stopping to get gas for her car?)

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: NotElvis on September 02, 2001, 07:07:00 AM
But I should add . . the "walleye" condition of her areolae/nipples is a bit concerning.

I've seen some of her earliest pictures with the string implants where her nipples/areolae are almost centered.  Not quite, but almost.

Now however they are very far outward.

I'm guessing (duh) that for whatever reason, as her breasts have grown, the skin on the inner side has stretched more easily than that on the outer side.

All very well and good.  Question: why?  Next question: is there anything she could have or can do to make the skin on the outside more pliable/elastic, or make the skin on the inside a bit tighter/firmer, or both, so that she can "re-center" so to speak, without having to go through a relocation type of surgery in order to achieve the same goal?

(of course this begs the question "Does she want to?  Or is she happy with them canted outward?")

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on September 02, 2001, 04:03:00 PM
btboy-
Thanks steveo. Your pic is great. I´ll try to BE happy. Long live Chelsea!!!  

Here! Here!

NotElvis- I thought I read somewhere that if she (or a helper) would have massaged them a certain way early on she would not have that walleye thing going on. Don't know no if it's true or not, maybe one of our experts like Melonie or JoiWest could enlighten us.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 19, 2001, 01:19:00 AM
anyone knows about this ???
as you might have guessed, she's a big (pun alert )
inspiration ;-)
or should i say TWO big inspirations (^_^)

cheers!

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 19, 2001, 09:40:00 PM
Cmdr. Mark was supposed to e-mail the URL weeks ago (lost it). Will try to get back to him because I've been looking for it ever since Yahoo disabled the adult club directories.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: richardosteele on October 27, 2001, 11:03:00 AM
This is undoubtedly rank heresy to say so on this site but my recent attendance at a really big fake breasts show was quite disappointing. I was in Chicago when I noted in the Sun-Times that Chelsea Charms was going to appear that the Admiral Theatre. Naturally, I made a point to be there. So did a lot of other guys, including one -- whom I did not meet -- who was said to have traveled all the way from Maine for the show, were primed for the show. Clearly, this was an event. Unfortunately, I have to say I left with that old let down feeling.

First, I did not think that Chelsea really looked all that good overall. Her legs are short, stubby, and not particularly shapely. She has some scars on her knees, as well. I thought her hips were nothing special. Her face is only moderately cute in my opinion; wholly aside from her bust, therefore, I don't think that I would even notice her at a bus stop if I were walking along the sidewalk.

Of course, the real reason for seeing Chelsea is to inspect her outsized bosom. In that respect I was disappointed as well. It looks so artificial and, well, just plain unlikely; that is, not just its dimensions (anyone who reads my stories knows that for me the bigger the better) but its shape is so unlike any boobs grown naturally that it is hard to be captivated by them.

Naturally, I had a fistfull of dollars which I handed up one by one to a smiling Chelsea. I was rewarded with a number of strong presses of her bosom against my face. The sensation was very strange. Her breasts are quite hard for one thing; for another, the skin on her bosom is very leathery. In short, I appreciated the gesture but this close-up and personal exposure to Chelsea's breasts was simply not erotic at all.

I should add that I talked with Chelsea briefly after the show and found her to be a really fine and considerate person -- a sweetheart! This makes me feel all the more disloyal to both her and the BEA congregation for making these comments. But discussion and disagreement is what this Board is all about. Does anyone agree with me? Disagree with me?  Am I out of line in even making these comments?

I should add that I saw a show in Richmond, Virginia a couple of years ago featuring Crystal Storm and Casey James. Both girls have huge, fake boobs but all four were very natural looking even if enormous. Chelsea's boobs simply did not -- maybe her string implants are getting too large, or something. I know this site has a whole lot of Chelsea admirers -- worshippers, even! -- and so I apologize once again for my possibly harsh comments. I've been harboring them ever since the night of the show and finally decided I should share then with the group. So ... let the thread begin!

Richard O. Steele

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: tina83 on October 27, 2001, 11:13:00 AM
I disagree completely about your review of her show.  I saw her show in person and I thought she was fabulous.  You are correct in saying that she is a sweetheart.  I know some people don't care for her, and that is okay.  I happen to think that she is wonderful.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on October 27, 2001, 11:26:00 AM
I saw Chelsea at the Admiral in Chicago also.  She is even better looking in person than in her pictures and videos :-)  However, she definitely could work on firming up her butt.  Minka's tits are just as big as Chelsea's - Minka has an incredible ass though.  Also, the Admiral Theater is very strict on how intimate the private dances are.  I received a lap dance from Chelsea after one of her stage shows and had a mixed feeling afterwards.  She smelled great and his very friendly, but at she was not allowed to grind on customers nor bury faces into her tremendous cleavage.  I have heard from guys who have seen here at more open-minded clubs where CC was allowed to jump on people and beat them in the face with her HUGE tits.  Maybe next time she is in town I will drop $750 to get a private dance in her hotel room..........
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on October 31, 2001, 01:23:00 AM
agree with some of your thoughts there richard, i enjoy looking at chelsea's massive size, but some pictures really show an awkward shape that the futher expansion of the string has caused. Still i'm not complaning, anyone such as chelsea and the likes that go through what they do to get us excited and help them make money, good on them. The thought that continually goes through my head is that the twine implants do not give the same weight looking effect as silicone or saline. does anyone know what the difference in weight factor is if chelseas's implants at her current size would be if silicone compared to twine?.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: hourglass on October 31, 2001, 01:45:00 PM
just how big is she now anyway?  Are there recent pix??  Thanks!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 31, 2001, 03:21:00 PM
Richard O. Steele:

I agree with you about the look of her "bosom" but (don't get me wrong  ) that's the exactly reason i like her.  

¡FTR!

see yaa...  =)

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on November 01, 2001, 02:02:00 AM
quote:
Originally posted by hourglass:
just how big is she now anyway?  Are there recent pix??  Thanks!

Very well. Make it so!
http://www.photoclubs.com/vip65.shtml  

That should do it, hourglass. These are the shots CC did earlier this month.

[ October 31, 2001: Message edited by: BypassCatch22 ]

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: hourglass on November 01, 2001, 02:40:00 AM
yeee-ha!
thanks a bunch, bypass!  She is amazing!  I find it VERY erotic that someone would want to do that to themselves.  How big are her breasts?  Are they still growing??  I really like that gold spandexy thing she's wearing!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 01, 2001, 08:58:00 AM
Yes, thank you very much for the link, Bypass -- you've made this Chelsea worshipper's day!  

As for the leathery nature of the skin on her bosom, that could be easily taken care of, if she were to apply either olive oil or cocoa butter to her boobs on a daily basis. That'd probably take care of the "east-west nipples" thing as well.

Thanks for your review, Richard.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on November 02, 2001, 07:03:00 AM
Your welcome gentlemen.  The gold lamay is my favorite as well.

As for the string implants the last word is none of them have stopped growing.  True BE at last!

Zookie about that cocoa butter thing, it works very well for some but not for most. As a nurse I've seen pregnant women that don't use anything and never develop anykind of mark at all.  Others get zero help from cocoa butter and develop numerous stretch marks. Some of them would go to a dermatologist on their next pregnancy and some would find relief from presciption items and oral Vitamin E, but most didn't.  It has to do with the inherent elasticity of the skin and unerlying fascia - not what is smeared on the surface.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on November 02, 2001, 07:59:00 AM
I too was at the Admiral for the CC show.  Even the Terrorist couldn't keep me away.  It was the very week of the bombing and the atmosphere was very somber.  Even in the excitement of the show I couldn't help thinking about the low turn out and how it was a reflection of the tragedy.

All that aside, this was the first and only 'feature' type show that I had ever been too.  I thoroughly enjoyed everything, from the attention of the ladies to the casual conversation of the bouncers.  I have to admit that I was overwhelmed by the beauty and sexuality of several of the dancers.

When CC came out, my jaw dropped to the floor and I could not have asked for more.  She was full of energy an moved gracefully around the stage. She had the sweetest face, just like the 'girl next door'. I only wish that I had the courage to be one of the front stage admirers.  After the show I was the second in line for a photo with the lady.  Not only was she very nice, but very responsive too.  I asked her to pose a certain way and she accomodated me. I would gladly pay to see her again if the opportunity arose.  The picture and the memories were well worth the two and one half hour trip to Chicago and the 'Kodak moment' picture comes out every day at lunch with the fellows so I can smerk and flaunt my adventure.  Sometimes the entire package is the 'thing' and not just one part.  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on November 13, 2001, 11:11:00 AM
 
(only 3 secs)

see yaa...  =)

[ November 14, 2001: Message edited by: hooterman ]

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 13, 2001, 11:38:00 AM
It's about time that Playboy acknowledged her existance!

Maybe next time, the clip will be longer...by which time, Chelsea will be even bigger, so there'll be more of her to appreciate!

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on November 13, 2001, 05:58:00 PM
Isn't she amazing! Will that girl ever stop growing? God, I hope not!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on November 14, 2001, 06:43:00 AM
if you guys cant get that link to play go here http://fym.8m.com/chelsea/  and right click and select save as the AVI file you can play it on your media player .

[ November 14, 2001: Message edited by: Agent Dee ]

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on November 14, 2001, 02:34:00 PM
Agent Dee:

Thank you for the fix (link).  

BTW, not as big as CC but she looks good too.

 
Tetanic (small).

see yaa...  =)

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on November 14, 2001, 06:44:00 PM
Hey, thats what I'm here for  .
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 03, 2002, 05:10:00 PM
Just wondering if anyone could post a review of Chelsea's new video here.I sent away for it but have not received it yet Maybe someone that went to Flashdancers bought one and could help me out,Thanks Scott  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on December 11, 2001, 04:26:00 AM
I LOVED that pic of Chelsea by the lake posted in the Members Gallery.  But what I would like even more is to see the rest of the pics in that series.  I'm curious where that pic comes from.  I mean, there isn't a new Chelsea's Chapter at her website yet nor are there any new pics.  I'll be looking forward to seeing the rest of the pics in that series!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on December 11, 2001, 04:41:00 AM
It's supposed to be a pic from CC's vacation. How long have you been a member @ her site?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jayjay88 on December 11, 2001, 09:45:00 AM
Look for it in the archives section of her site.
......jayjay.........  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: superspy on December 11, 2001, 10:51:00 AM
hmmm... I've been a member there since it started, and I've never come across that pic... anyone have any luck finding it in her archive??
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on December 11, 2001, 12:36:00 PM
I've been a member for months, I've been through those archives quite a few times, and I have never come across that pic.  What archive are you guys talking about?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 11, 2001, 05:49:00 PM
Regardless, that is an amazing picture, one that helps confirm that she is indeed one of the biggest women out there on the circuit, if not THE biggest.

Wonderful. I wonder how far out the eyes of the other users of the beach that day went!

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jayjay88 on December 11, 2001, 11:56:00 PM
Sorry, guys, i must have been wrong about the archives...i know there are many holiday snaps on her site...but my comment was made before i saw the pic.  And i don't think i've seen it before either.
............   ..................jayjay
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: seforin on December 12, 2001, 01:47:00 AM
no worries we just bug whoever post it till they leak info.......

Ok someone get the tar and feathers  

-wants more chelsea picks so badly person
-seforin

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on December 12, 2001, 03:53:00 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Leary:
But what I would like even more is to see the rest of the pics in that series.  I'm curious where that pic comes from.

I'll be looking forward to seeing the rest of the pics in that series!


From her website...there's going to be an update soon.  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on December 13, 2001, 02:35:00 AM
Ah HA!! I see we  have an inside man(or woman) working in our midst.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 11, 2001, 09:06:00 PM
Did anyone catch her show ?
http://www.msclive.com/Features-Current.html
http://www.chelseacharms.com/chasing.html

I saw her in Chicago last year - the whole crowd was dumbfounded by gorgeous she was.  She has the biggest rack I have EVER seen in person !   Chelsea is so beautiful that she would look great even if her chest measured 36C.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 14, 2001, 12:47:00 PM
Richard O. Steele,

What details do you have on Chelsea Charms ?

Does she dance only or does she do "extras" ?

Inquiring minds want to know.... ;-)

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on December 14, 2001, 08:06:00 PM
chelsea's website has a banner click to e-mail her re a personal show, the details i don't know. Being outside u.s i enquired to the possibilities of a private video to a personal script, but chelsea davised that she does not do private vid's, which brings me to my next point, it's been along time waiting for her to release another video for sale. Which brings me to another point whicj i'll start a new thread, bad experiences at strip clubs.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: richardosteele on December 15, 2001, 03:05:00 AM
I got my information on Chelsea from the TBD Board. Go to www.bigdoggie.net,  click on "boards," click on "pornstars", and then click on "Search Message Base." Put in "Chelsea" for the search item and then search for, say, 300 days. You will find some stuff. You could also search other city message boards to see if she shows up there. Anyway, I should add that my experience with Chelsea consisted of watching her dance at the Admiral in Chicago -- period! I have no hands-on or more experience. I did find this message on TBD, though; it was posted by one Chris1606:

"She has to meet you first for full service, she's very selective. I went to see her dance, introduced myself, then showed her a picture of me and another porn star in bed to prove I wasn't a cop. She does full service for a grand an hour. Worth the price of admission."

Take it for what it's worth.

Richard O. Steele

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 18, 2001, 01:01:00 PM
Who knows the truth here ?  Does she escort ?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jayjay88 on December 18, 2001, 01:21:00 PM
I may be wrong here, but i'd say a private dance does not necessarily mean 'escort'.  It's hard to imagine that someone as successful as Chelsea would result to escorting....at least not now in her 'hey-day'...i can understand retired porn stars escorting, and i could imagine a dancer, once at the top of the ladder, but now replaced by others in the popularity stakes choosing to 'escort' because it brings in easy bucks...and these comments are NOT value judgements, it's just i'm not crazy about these speculations being thrown about without genuine information...it can be hurtful to the model and possibly damaging to her reputation...no doubt someone will give examples to the contrary, but it would not prove a particular case.
I'd be interested what the BB dancers who frequent the forum have to say on the matter based on their own experience.
............jayjay
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DTM on December 18, 2001, 01:54:00 PM
GoCubsGo, I'm guessing you are in the Chicago area and are waiting her return the the Imperial Theatre. LOL  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 18, 2001, 02:17:00 PM
DTM,

You know what's up.   Admiral Theater is where she has been the last two times to Chicago

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DTM on December 18, 2001, 05:20:00 PM
GoCubsGo, Sorry meant the Admiral. I've been wanting to go there since she first hit the scene . I'm up in Minnesota Twin City area . Wouldn't be to bad a drive. Just can never swing it. Ironicly she lives just minutes from me(don't know where)in the metro area. As far as I know she never dances around here either. I've asked to meet her in a public place of her choice but she has never responded.
   About the escorting ,all I can tell you is she is supposed to do it. Not a regular thing. You have to be at the club. She has to feel safe and all like that. Trust and being a gentlemen probably helps too. Someone else has said you need a picture of you and another known escort in bed together or something to that effect. So she knows your not a cop. I'm sure there is more to it than that. Like if she's in the mood and has the time. She's got to **82** once in a while.
  I'm still getting the feeling some here think this is an awful thing for her to do. Well it's her choice and she has to live with it. And I still can't believe some think she is making tons of money just dancing. The modeling doesn't pay squat either.  DTM

PS I'm sure Mr Chili Palmer could give you some tips if you ask him.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 19, 2001, 07:40:00 AM
DTM,

You are in luck - she will be doing Private Dances in the Twin Cities area on February 8th and 9th.  Looking forward to your review ;-)
http://www.chelseacharms.com/chasing.html

January 16 - 20, 2002
Leggs Gentleman's Club
Kansas City, Missouri
-------------------------------------

January 25 - 26
PRIVATE DANCES
Detroit, Michigan
---------------------------------------

February 8 - 9
PRIVATE DANCES
Minneapolis, Minnesota
-------------------------------------

February 18 - 23
Flashdancers
New York, New York
-------------------------------------

March 8 - 9
PRIVATE DANCES
Houston, Texas
-------------------------------------

March 10 - 11
PRIVATE DANCES
Dallas, Texas
-------------------------------------

April 2 - 4
PRIVATE DANCES
New York, New York
--------------------------------------

May 24 - 25
PRIVATE DANCES
Atlanta, Georgia
--------------------------------------

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on December 18, 2001, 08:28:00 PM
The fact that a particular feature chooses to provide 'up close and personal' experiences for fans is, in my own opinion, strictly a private matter based on personal comfort level.  I have no first-hand knowledge that Chelsea does in fact choose to do this, but there are certainly other features who do and make no bones about it.

The real point here is income versus investment.  I know this has been discussed in the past, but the high paying 'big tit feature club circuit' which existed in the early 90's when the first features with really huge implants came on the scene, and which provided excellent income opportunities and lots of incentive for other girls to get huge implants, no longer exists.  Instead there are only a handful of well known clubs who still book big tit features regularly, i.e. Flashdancers, the Admiral, Market St. Cinema etc.  For the most part they book less shows and pay lower fees than in the heyday of huge boobs of the early 90's.  These clubs cannot continue to book the same feature too often either, usually resulting in four appearances per year as a maximum for the same girl. .  The only other income opportunities while working the club circuit are stage tips (down because less guys are going to clubs), merchandise sales (also down for the same reason), and payments for 'up close and personal' fan services.  Additionally, there are many 'second tier' clubs which will occasionally book a big tit feature, but who are very 'fee conscious' in the amount they are willing to pay, and these clubs also represent a big question mark in regard to attendance, tips, merchandise etc.  Lower booking fees, lower club earnings, and equal or higher travel and hotel expenses means less profitability pure and simple.

In regard to income sources other than live performances, big tit magazine modeling fees are usually close to a break-even situation meaning that models choose to do magazine shoots for the exposure.  The same situation is true of commercial TV appearances like Jenny Jones (except they throw in the insults for free!).  Even cable TV has reportedly taken to scarfing 'free content', with the much touted upcoming HBO 'size matters' special consisting of shots taken by HBO's own photographers at the Vegas show last August (with no modeling fees paid).

Website profitability is declining because bandwidth costs continue to rise while the poor economy has reduced the number of paying members, plus every day more websites spring up to compete (legally or illegally).  About the only really profitable area in the internet these days is live one on one video chat, but even in this area the operating costs are already increasing and the competition is getting stiffer.

The only two areas which continue to consistently pay very well are XXX and 'up close and personal' live experiences for fans.  With other income opportunities now very limited, I totally respect any model's choice to enter these fields.  With the outrageously high cost of huge custom made breast implants, and the high cost of 'maintenance' (i.e. travelling to a specialist for checkups and periodic implant replacement/repair surgeries).  I highly doubt that you will be seeing any new big tit models who do not participate in XXX and 'up close and personal' experiences for fans.  Existing big tit models who depend on show business as their primary source of income are very hard pressed to earn a living these days without doing XXX and 'up close and personal' fan service.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on December 18, 2001, 08:30:00 PM
"Someone else has said you need a picture of you and another known escort in bed together or something to that effect."

Call me naive, but I thought that all that was necessarily involved in "escorting" was a date. You know, dinner, maybe a movie, perhaps a chance to take some photos of your own. And that anything beyond that was not something paid for, but won by your charm, as in any non-paid for date. (Not that candy, flowers, and a meal at a good restaurant are cheap!)

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on December 19, 2001, 12:20:00 PM
OK, you are naive !  Actually, very naive !
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sc on December 19, 2001, 12:49:00 PM
Werelocktemp, "escorting" is the modern word for "upscale **31**." Of course, if all you want is dinner and a movie, for a couple hundred dollars an escort would be happy to oblige.

Many escorts who advertise on the Web have a statement on their Web site that they think will protect them from law enforcement. A typical statement (taken from an actual site):

"Also, be aware that no one represented on this site is making an offer for **31**. Money exchanged is for time and companionship only. Time together may include services such as nude dancing, modeling, or sensual massage. Anything else that may occur is a matter of personal choice between consenting adults of legal age, and is NOT contracted for nor requested to be contracted for or compensated for in any manner."

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pacman on December 19, 2001, 12:50:00 PM
He may be naive, but I don't think too many escorts would mind dinner and movie and simply that.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: striper21 on December 19, 2001, 09:07:00 PM
Jeez, sure has been a lot of buzzing about Chelsea's 'Private Dances' on this and various other boards...lots of querries and speculation. The figure mentioned for these off-campus encounters is $750 per hour. That is correct as she will notify anyone asking on her 'PD' gif on her website.

So let's set the record straight about this fee for this one hour. I know because I have had two. It consists of a wonderful hour with a wonderful gal, away from the crowds of the club and in private. It is verrrrry hands on which should be no surprise for anyone that has had a private lap dance with her at MSC's Star Room or any of the clubs where she is so allowed...lot's of mileage. Let's do the math: her laps are usually $50 per 5 minutes or thereabouts, so one hour would amount to $600...in a damned club. Does that make an hour in private worth it? That you have to answer for yourself, but if your fantasy is to spend intimate time with the MT Everest of Boobs - as was mine - then it was worth every farthing. But for that amount you get a hands-on dance and 'das ist alles.'

But ahh you say, we have heard rumors of more being offered, for some mentioned extra donation...the figure being bandied about is $1K. Do I know something about that? Yup, you bet I do. Am I going to tell the details? Nope, not on this or any public board. It is a 'private' dance and what goes on remains just that...private. I believe in discretion. Any dancer that overtly advertizes her availability for extras - read Kayla - has, by default, become public knowledge. Any feature that DOES NOT is also making a statement: it is private, and public forums are one place where those of us who've seen her will not 'bray.'

IF you truly desire the answer to THE question -does she or doesn't she? - it is easy to resolve. Do what some of us have already...schedule your private dance hour and pay the $750. Lo...it is just she and you and one can relax and talk freely. The answer will be forthcoming in private. And always remember, you have paid for an aggressive and grinding lap dance and nothing more, and nothing more has been offered. Yet...she isn't going to be around forever and thus, for me, was money well spent...I'll remember it forever.

One other way - GoCubsGo - is to have a viewable e-mail addy, not private...get a hotmail or Yahoo address for God's sake.
None are going to say anything here. If people want to speculate in public, so be it, but that leaves many open dates coming up for some of us to quietly enjoy future private dances with her.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jayjay88 on December 19, 2001, 09:48:00 PM
Thanks, Tarponguy...that is revealing info.
You are to be envied your experience...if i had the extra cash, i wouldn't hesitate to have the private session.

And thanks Melonie for the real dope...it's easy to be out of date on these things...but if it's so bad there probably won't be any new BB stars in the future, unless a woman just wants notoriety.

........oh well, it was good while it lasted.
......jayjay  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 20, 2001, 05:35:00 PM
Melonie Charm and tarponguy,

Thank you very much for your insights !

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on December 21, 2001, 07:41:00 AM
And here I was hoping to find someone to go see Lord of the Rings with ...

-Munch "Oh wait, I have a gf, never mind" Wolf

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on January 08, 2002, 11:30:00 PM
I keep hearing good things about the official site 9.99 soon to be 14.99.  and the photoclubs site 19.99 a month.  Does the official site keep all her pics or do they go away like the photoclubs site to make room for the new stuff.  I can only afford one at a moment, i plan on joining both.  Any help in making me decide would be most helpfull, so far im leaning towards the official site at the moment.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: superspy on January 08, 2002, 11:43:00 PM
Both Chelsea's official site as well as Photoclubs archive the old posts- you can find all the pictures that either site has published on their archive pages.

As far as which site to choose, one thing that may help you decide is that Photoclubs shoots all their Chelsea pics at the same time (an intensive multi-day photoshoot), so all the photos for the year are taken at once.  On Chelsea's official site you get photos taken at different times during the year.  And with Chelsea, that can mean that things have changed quite a bit.  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 09, 2002, 12:40:00 AM
I like both sites.  Chelsea announced on her website that she just returned from a shoot with photoclubs awhile back. The site had been up at least a year when she wrote that. So I think she still shoots with them. I suggest that you try them both.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: superspy on January 09, 2002, 09:23:00 AM
I should have stated that more clearly... Chelsea does still shoot with Photoclubs, but once per year.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Faulkner on January 09, 2002, 10:03:00 PM
Actually, it appears that Chelsea's Photoclubs site is in the process of changing -- at least somewhat. In the past, you could always access all of the photoshoots that they had ever published from the beginning of time (or at least the beginning of the club). It seems that they now are rotating out the older clubs as they add new clubs: currently the oldest club available in the "archives" is Album 1 Shoot #6 (from October 30, 2000), even though there were 5 shoots published prior to it.

I suspect they are taking a page from the Score Group's philosophy in regard to models for whom they no longer have new content being generated, ala Tiffany Towers. In these clubs, they routinely make available a moving window of twelve or so photoshoots out of a total of 23 they have availble. Photoclubs is probably trying to "protect their interests" by giving members a reason to join more frequently than, say, once a year and getting all of the updates they have missed.

I don't know if this is really the current policy or just an oversight in creating the "Archives" page (I would guess the former). Not having been a member of any other Photoclubs sites in the past few months, I can't speak for the practices there. Perhaps someone else who is a current member could. Of course, Chelsea represents one of their hottest commodities (given that she does almost no print work for anyone other than her own web site), so they may be particularly concerned in her case.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on January 10, 2002, 06:33:00 PM
Its a tough choice which Chelsea club to join - I'd probably do her official site simply because there is alot more stuff on her site and lots more candid photos of her in everyday clothing where she looks amazing. My only complaint about her site is that she doesnt faithfully update - she seems to try to update monthly but it goes into 6 weeks or so sometimes. But her updates are usually worth the wait. Photoclubs are faithfully updated bi-monthly but sometimes they recycle outfits that the models wear. I know this for a fact since I am a member of the Casey James photoclubs.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on January 11, 2002, 01:22:00 AM
Thanks for the help guys, i decided to go with the official chelsea.com club for now.  Next month ill get both.  FYI chelsas site is pretty damn cool the members section i mean.  look for me on the messageboard im AgentDee with no space.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on January 22, 2002, 03:41:00 AM
well i tried the offical chelsea club but i decided to go with the photoclubs site, more pics updated more often and the video clips play in Media player mode which i can go full screen and not loose clarity, word of advice, upgrade to media player 7.1 its worth the download .
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: WipEout on January 22, 2002, 05:49:00 PM
Errr, Join Photoclubs for the month, suck off everything you can, cancel! Do that once or twice a year and you're set!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 22, 2002, 05:57:00 PM
Actually, not anymore.  They don't put the new updates in the archive immediately anymore.  I guess to stop what you are suggesting. I think I missed a couple of great updates since I used to join every couple of months. Oops!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: shadowcom on January 11, 2002, 06:36:00 PM
If anyone has them ? Because it looks like if she has problems with her absolutely enormous now breasts.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 11, 2002, 06:58:00 PM
What kind of problems?  I think she does have problems keeping them in a shirt, and keeping guys from drooling on them! No really, what do you mean?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: shadowcom on January 12, 2002, 08:52:00 AM
I mean the deformations of her vertebral column - she becomes more and more stooping (just check different series of her pictures), as also more and more bend forward becomes her neck. And these are evident problems not only for young woman, but for everyone.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 12, 2002, 10:50:00 AM
Let me guess...You have never seen her in person?  That is a lot of weight to carry, however I am sure she will handle any medical conditions that arise. Are you suggesting a breast reduction, or are you offering to give her a free medical exam?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: shadowcom on January 12, 2002, 03:55:00 PM
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrHHH on January 13, 2002, 01:35:00 AM
She's recovering from spine replacement surgery. Aparently one night while she was swinging around the 'ol pole, she snapped completely in two.

Surprisingly, she's bragging about it.  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Connoisseur on January 13, 2002, 03:12:00 AM
Maybe she's just pregnant.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on January 13, 2002, 03:35:00 AM
Facts of life and physics, I'm afraid.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on January 14, 2002, 12:59:00 AM
Damn physics, and while we're at it to hell with the law of gravity.  Just when we get a few decent cases of RL BE mother nature gets all feminist on us.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on January 16, 2002, 07:02:00 AM
Just to throw this out to everyone.Has anyone been refused a private dance with Chelsea for whatever reason ? Or is it strictly about money like everthing else,Thanks Scott
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on March 08, 2002, 04:14:00 PM
Those airport security guards probably broke their wrists..... :-)
http://www.chelseacharms.com/cgibin/webforum/viewmessage.cgi?r=1501556&l=level2

(posted by Chelsea Charms at chelseacharms.com on March 8, 2002)

Message:

"Thank you, everyone, for all the Birthday wishes, cards, and gifts. It was a bit uneventful though, as I spent it in airports, flying to Houston. It's just not the same big deal as an adult as it was when I was a **09**. Mom did call at 10:06am (the time when I was born) and we chatted before I headed out. Unfortunately, no special treatment at the airports for birthday girls, unless that's how they view the hand search I got selected for--oh well. And my flight was delayed, but I wasn't letting anything get me in a bad mood. Again, Thanks! Lots of love, Chelsea"

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BillN on March 08, 2002, 04:36:00 PM
Just a hand search??!!

When the've got strip searching and body cavity probes at their disposal?!

Faggots!  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: debra872 on March 08, 2002, 09:18:00 PM
Before you get too excited at the visual, "hand search" could mean just her luggage.  Seems like otherwise, she would have elaborated on the guard's reaction, or "fortunately they didn't get *too* friendly" or the like.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on March 08, 2002, 10:40:00 PM
The airport security people would have been in for a big (make that two BIG) suprises, if they performed a strip-search.  I wonder if other busty goddesses like Minka, Kayla, Maxi, Casey, etc. have been hassled at airports for fear that they are smuggling "deadly weapons" in their bras ;-)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: plusbas on March 09, 2002, 03:27:00 AM
Last month at Logan Airport in Boston I tried not to ogle as airport security investigated a not-unattractive C-cuppish fellow-traveller who was exciting the metal detecting wand.  The very butch female guard asked the suspect if she was wearing an underwire.  Our heroine thought for a sec, replied in the affirmative, whereupon the guard proceeded to feel every millimeter of both wires (through the clothing) and added quite a grope down the cleavage.  It was a high point of my flight to Paris.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on March 10, 2002, 05:51:00 AM
FYI: Melonie talks about her experiences with airport security here...

http://forum.bearchive.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=001714


steveo

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Prophet_Tenebrae on March 10, 2002, 03:12:00 PM
Wait, wait! I've got it, I finally understand the purpose of cross-dressing!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on March 10, 2002, 03:35:00 PM
It happened again two weeks ago on both sides of the border when I was returning from Mexico!  I didn't flash the 'Federales', though.  I imagine they'd just love to have a blond gringa with huge hooters in their custody for a while ...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tux on March 15, 2002, 03:42:00 AM
"Smuggling deadly weapons"?  Don't you mean smuggling "Leatha Weapons"? ^_^
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BillN on March 15, 2002, 12:12:00 PM
You're right Mel.

"Badges, we don't need no stinkin' badges."

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on March 09, 2002, 06:14:00 PM
I am eagerly anticipating the video's arrival.  Here is the first review I have found:
http://www.chelseacharms.com/cgibin/webforum/viewmessage.cgi?r=1501562&l=level2

posted by Alucard at scarlet_rain@vampirehunter.com on March 9, 2002)

Message:

Well, Today I finally had the joy of getting to see two movies I've wanted to see for the longest time. I woke up to find that I recieved My Chelsea Expo Video. So, I guess you're wondering was it worth the wait........ It certainly was. I've only gotten to see it once so far(I just got in). So what in the video: A LOT! What we get treated to is two days of Chelsea at the Exotic Dancer Expo 2001. We get to see her talk and mingle with both fans and dancers alike. Chelsea wasn't kidding when she said that her gold pants(the ones she had on with the red bikini top)were a little loose. On a few scenes, she was seen hiking up her pants. A little cute if you ask me. But We are the treated to see Chelsea doing one of her Photoshoots. Remember the leopard skin chair shoot, yep we get to see her taking photos with that. We even get to see some never before seen photos from that shoot. Plus there's a little special bonus after the expo video. I won't ruin it for you fans....it's well worth it. Worth $35....Certainly was. I look forward to the next video. Too bad I can't pre-order it. BTW, Loved the choice of music for the photo shoot. Classical always was one of my favorite genres. The second movie I got to see was Queen of the Damned. In a word = dissapointing. I'm a fan of Ann Rices Books and was alittle annoied on how this movie turned out. Not that anyone cares about Queen of the damned, but thought I would mention it anyway."

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on March 14, 2002, 10:59:00 PM
I'm not here to take over "just me mike's" job, but here's my submation of the video.

It's O.K, but it could have been so much better. The bulk of the video shows chelsea standing at her booth talking, chatting. It becomes very repetitive and if that's what you like you could always repeat a previous scene, not just keep filming the same thing. Far more interesting would have been a wider shot showing peoples reaction to chelseas huge tits. In all it's good to get a new video of Chelsea, but the following items would have made it get a better rating with me. 3 out of 5.

1. Chelsea dressing for CES
2. Chelsea going from hotel to CES with out in the street shots, getting the general public's perception of those breasts
3. Chelsea relaxing after the CES, mixing with the other girls.

"Remember an opinion is just that an opinion"

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JustMeMike on March 15, 2002, 01:25:00 AM
Thanks for the reviews Zappfra and GoCubsGo. I write my reviews in R & D, but I do like to read comments by other viewers. Hope to see more.  

 

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 01, 2002, 08:06:00 PM
I just wonder cuz she keeps getting bigger and bigger and bigger! What's her bust measurement now anywayz?

By the way, I do have a couple other questions...is there anyone else out there trying to go bigger? Will we see anyone try to go even bigger than Chelsea? Will string implants ever be used again? Thanks.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ApesMa on February 01, 2002, 08:23:00 PM
All I can say, subject to health constraints, is: one can but hope.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 01, 2002, 09:04:00 PM
Everyone might find this interesting.I just received an email from Kayla Kleevage,she said she was going to get different implants maybe bigger ones. I have to believe if you have enough money you can pretty much do anything. Probably a competition thing going here too
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dixie DeLite on February 01, 2002, 09:18:00 PM
You have to go out of the country to get bigger than 1200cc implants.  Then bring them though customs into the USA.  Then find a PS that is willing to put them in.  The PS has to be able to have their own orperating equipment.  Because the hospitals will not let them use theirs.  It can be alot work to find large implants.  I know because I have 1200cc overfilled to 1500cc.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveZ on February 01, 2002, 10:11:00 PM
ok, but i fyou leave the country to have the surgery done, will they not let you through customs afterward?  

Steve Z

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dixie DeLite on February 02, 2002, 01:35:00 AM
If you bring them into this country before surgery, they're in a box unopened.  If you have them put in outside the USA, then you don't deal with customs.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 02, 2002, 04:03:00 AM
Unless the boys at customs want to cop a feel!  

They might claim you are smuggling contraband in your over-inflated tits!  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 02, 2002, 04:11:00 AM
About CC, not in this dimension.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BacE on February 02, 2002, 10:33:00 AM
i don't think she'll reach 100, because each breast would aprox. have to increase by 400% in volume (that would mean almost double in diameter).
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: hourglass on February 02, 2002, 11:59:00 AM
wow, does anyone know how big CC is now?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on February 02, 2002, 06:10:00 PM
I'm certainly no expert, but a 100 inch bust measurement for human skin covered breasts just does not compute.  In order for the skin covering the breasts to stay healthy it needs an adequate blood supply.  The larger the breasts become the more difficult it is for the body to provide that much blood to the breast tissue.  With regular sized implants and a 40 inch measurement, no problem.  But with a 50 inch bust measurement like mine the breast skin blood vessels start to get quite enlarged and show up as blue lines under the skin.  With a 60 inch bust measurement like Chelsea's the blood vessels get pronounced and start to protrude above the skin.  With a 100 inch bustline the body would need to grow blood vessels the size of garden hoses!

On the subject of your joke about getting huge boobs through customs and airport security, I've had a couple of incidents already where the officers were wondering what I was smuggling under my sweater.  The last time it happened, rather than get escorted to a side room and waste 1/2 hour getting the 'convict treatment', I just popped up my blouse at the metal detector to show them what I was 'smuggling' and said "only in America, Guys!".  "YES MA'AM!"
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 03, 2002, 06:03:00 AM
Melonie, I'm sure that was better for them than checking footwear  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: redtalon11 on February 03, 2002, 09:18:00 AM
Yeah, and then they were the ones sporting the wicks.      

Red Talon

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrHHH on February 03, 2002, 02:56:00 PM
quote:
Originally posted by melonie_charm:
On the subject of your joke about getting huge boobs through customs and airport security, I've had a couple of incidents already where the officers were wondering what I was smuggling under my sweater.  The last time it happened, rather than get escorted to a side room and waste 1/2 hour getting the 'convict treatment', I just popped up my blouse at the metal detector to show them what I was 'smuggling' and said "only in America, Guys!".  "YES MA'AM!"

Yeah, Melonie rocks. You all know it.  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DTM on February 03, 2002, 05:09:00 PM
Talk about a living and breathing BE story. Has anyone heard if Chelsea is begining to have any trouble hauling those monsters around ? I understand they were,at first, lighter because of the string. She didn't appear to have any troubles at first. But I have to think they are getting heavier buy the month. If the fluid is catching up with the rest. I emailed her about this once but she has not answered back on anything in a long time.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: shadowcom on February 04, 2002, 08:01:00 AM
It's interesting to see some of her photos, made before BE.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 05, 2002, 07:12:00 AM
I'm surprised CC has never posted here ... I wonder if she lurks?

-Munch "it's coming out day for lurkers" Wolf

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JohnnyA on February 05, 2002, 09:50:00 PM
Chelsea is unfortunately the best case for Bigger is not always better having seen her in person. Just Super freaky.Zena Folsum was a better sculpted freak show.

I doubt if Kayla is concerned with Chelsea. Kayla was AWESOME with her string size, too bad she is having problems. Of all the "porn" ladies, she is the hottest in stationary or in action...and the nicest feature I have ever met !!!!! Can't wait to see the New Set !

But, BEST MEGA BUST, has GOT to go to MINKA !
Candy Cantalopes was the previous Queen. Seeing Minka in person is amazing becuase of the shape of her knockers and she has incredible skin ! She has ALWAYS had perfect shape as her "evolution" continues...

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pacman on February 05, 2002, 10:02:00 PM
Kayla.... is that you?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 06, 2002, 04:07:00 AM
Bigger isn't always better? To quote a Warner Brother's cartoon - "Don't you believe it!"
The concern that keeps building in my mind is how much more can she take?  At this point, if stopping the growth requires removal of the string implants wouldn't that mean a reduction?  Because no one could tolerate the weight of that much silicone (if available by then).  Would saline work or again be available in that size?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Bold_Dude on February 10, 2002, 11:10:00 AM
quote:
Originally posted by BypassCatch22:
Because no one could tolerate the weight of that much silicone (if available by then).  Would saline work or again be available in that size?

Unless I miss my guess, silicone is less dense than saline.  I don't have particular estimate for what the density of silicone *is*, it's just a feeling.

On the subject of Chelsea reaching 100 inches... as we all know, bust measurements are extremely dependent on shape.  Conveniently for geometric estimates, Chelsea is pretty close to spherical.  Assuming she remained spherical at that size, a 100 inch... circumference... would require breasts somewhere around 18 inches in diameter.  That's assuming standing, as dangling is not convenient for math.

Now, I've long thought 18-inch diameter breasts would be a great thing, but I've also long known that a sphere of 18 inch diameter has a volume of a little over 13 gallons.  Yes, 13 gallons.

With gravity the way it's been lately, I doubt Miss Chelsea would be too keen on holding up 26 gallons of whatever fluids fill up string-ified breasts.  I've no doubt overestimated the size required to *claim* a 100 inch bust, but I thought I should provide a rough idea of scale.

On the subject of holding up weight, I've done some... let's call them top-secret experiments with water balloons.  And in this forum, I'm not ashamed to admit my scientific curiousity.  Just embarrassed.    This is a whole other subject, but the heaviest I ever got off the ground had a combined weight of around 110 pounds-- about the weight of one of the theoretical 18 inch silly string breasts.

Which is why we need permanent settlements on Mars and the Moon.  Low gravity is the friend of BE.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 11, 2002, 04:48:00 AM
Low gravity is indeed the friend of BE!

Just for the record, thanks to Melonie Charms and her constant informative posts - silicone is much heavier than serum.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 11, 2002, 08:29:00 AM
What we need are Helium implants ...

-Munch "Just don't overinflate unless you warn air traffic control first" Wolf

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on February 12, 2002, 02:02:00 AM
Helium, plain air and other gas filled implants cannot actually work because the gas molecules are so small that they diffuse through the implant bag causing the implants to deflate.  However, one french implant maker actually attempted an experiment using carbon dioxide filled light weight implants (and which the girls could fill up more themselves).  Apparently the CO2 molecules are large enough to stay in the implant bag where they belong.  Too bad they never became widely available!  There are lots of days when I wish my breasts weighed two pounds instead of twenty!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: STrRedWolf on February 12, 2002, 06:19:00 AM
quote:
Originally posted by melonie_charm:
However, one french implant maker actually attempted an experiment using carbon dioxide filled light weight implants (and which the girls could fill up more themselves).  Apparently the CO2 molecules are large enough to stay in the implant bag where they belong.  Too bad they never became widely available!  There are lots of days when I wish my breasts weighed two pounds instead of twenty!

Unfortunately, as discussed someplace on BEA, gas-filled breast inplants would virtually explode once they got into thinner air (say, the wearer got into an airplane and got into crusing altitude).  OUCH!  

However, there is sort of a solution -- sort of.  Theory only at this time:

Connect the implants to a small pill-sized pump, which regulates air pressure and maintains the apropriate pressure of CO2 at all times.  The pump would connect to the outside world via the only availible opening in the front -- the belly button.  

Now why is this not viable at this time?  Well, they only gotten a camera to be in a pill.  You got to filter out everything but CO2, pump it in or out, and regulate pressure -- not something current technology is able to do at this time.  Add onto that the need for a battery to make it all worth while.  Four pills, interconnected, maybe?

When we get that, then we'll be able to get 100" breasts w/o any weight problems.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tugboatcap on February 12, 2002, 04:27:00 PM
Your airline thinking is a little off the mark.  Airliners are PRESSURIZED so the implants would actually be a fraction SMALLER, unless the airliner experinced sudden decompression.  Only then would the implants expand.
Just a thought,
Tugboatcap!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: macros on February 12, 2002, 04:56:00 PM
You are correct that an airplane cabin is pressurized.  HOWEVER .. .. The cabin is generally pressurized at 5000 feet, so the outcome would be a size consistent with what her boobs would look like, say, on the road up to South Lake Tahoe.  

Cheers,
MTB

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: rtpoe on February 02, 2002, 03:51:00 AM
Just wanted to let you know that Chelsea Charms is scheduled to be appearing at Flashdancers in NYC the week of February 18 - 23.

I plan on catching a show.

rtpoe  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on February 14, 2002, 12:48:00 PM
http://www.chelseacharms.com/cgibin/webforum/viewmessage.cgi?r=1501490&l=level2

Video !!

(posted by Chelsea Charms at chelseacharms.com on February 13, 2002)

Message:

Hi guys! The new video will make its debut in New York this next week. It's being duped right now, and it should be delivered to me in New York on Tuesday the 19th. So unfortunately, I may not have any on Monday for my first shows. Its 45 minutes following me around in Vegas for the Expo, and doing a photo shoot there. It will sell for $30 VHS ( plus s&h for those who don't purchase it from me in person) and $45 PAL (plus s&h). For my current snail mail fan club members who order it before June 1, '02, it will only be $20 plus s&h. I hope you all enjoy! Lots of love, Chelsea

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sander815 on February 14, 2002, 08:54:00 PM
ah, finally
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on February 14, 2002, 09:00:00 PM
Speaking of Chelsea, her site at http://www.photoclubs.com  updated early. She looks incredible. Can't wait for the video
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on March 07, 2002, 05:52:00 PM
Any reviews yet ?   I'm dying to know how she looks in the new vid.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 21, 2002, 09:21:00 PM
Just curious here. Seems like nobody talks about Chelsea anymore.Is her Star starting to fade.Thanks,Scott
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dbot on February 21, 2002, 09:31:00 PM
Well, I don't know about anyone else who posts or lurks here, but I plan on seeing her this week at FlashDancers in NYC (probably Saturday). She's really great-- no "fading star" here! And pictures do NOT tell the story. You have to see this lady in the flesh (so to speak) to believe her breasts.
Dbot
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on February 21, 2002, 10:08:00 PM
Her star is burning bright as ever.  You should see her new pix at http://www.photoclubs.com  !!  I hear the photos in her personal website are great too, but am not a member yet.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on February 21, 2002, 10:24:00 PM
on a couple of occassions pictures have been posted at hooters forum with charming ventures logo, yet i've never seen them at chelsea's site. anyone know how the pictures get out, yet members at chelsea's can't see them.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on February 21, 2002, 11:53:00 PM
To anyone who thinks Chelsea's star is not shining bright. Let me just say that you stand corrected.  Dick and I have seen her on many occasions..as a matter of fact we went to Flashdancers, in New York City, last night to see her show. We have never been disappointed and once you see her you'll know why. Okay so her tits are over the top...but she carries them very well.Let's just say her personality matches her beauty. She is so down to earth and funny - she is always a pleasure to hang out with. If her show is ever in town do not miss the opportunity to see it.

                      Jane(and Dick)

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrHHH on February 22, 2002, 12:03:00 AM
Chelsa who?

That name sound familiar...Oh well. Can't be anyone special.  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pacman on February 22, 2002, 12:28:00 AM
I think there isn't as much talk, because besides recently we haven't seen a lot of photos of her.

Seems like there are droughts here and there.

I know her regular site, and non-photoclub one went a long time without a significant picture update.

Her new video thats on the way may stir things up a bit.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 22, 2002, 01:38:00 AM
Don't get me wrong here.I am a huge fan of hers too.I have seen her twice and she is fantastic.I think her new video will recharge everyones batteries,thanks Scott  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 22, 2002, 04:12:00 AM
Not as much talk? No new pics?   Where has everyone been?  On hooters.dk's user gallery new pics of CC (from her paysite and Photoclubs) go up all the time.

As for threads, did everyone miss "Can Chelsea Charms measurements reach 100 inches?"?

Maybe I'm an obsessed net stalker/fan, but this girl keeps getting bigger as in following not measurements.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 22, 2002, 06:39:00 AM
For anyone who's had the wonderful opportunity to see Chelsea Charms in person (you lucky!!) and look into her massive cleavage, can you venture a guess as to the length of her cleavage?  What I mean is how long is it from her ribcage to the end of her nipple (i.e. the length of her breast)?

thanx,
breastlover

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 23, 2002, 06:47:00 AM
As for those new pics there are still several up from the latest posting at Chelsea's website on the user gallery @ hooters.dk.

I am so glad that hooters is outside the everyday laws of time and space.  

Since time is in direct relation to gravity and gravity is determined by mass, does that mean time slows down the closer you get to CC.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on February 23, 2002, 04:13:00 PM
quote:
Originally posted by breastlover:
...can you venture a guess as to the length of her cleavage?  What I mean is how long is it from her ribcage to the end of her nipple (i.e. the length of her breast)?
...

42        

quote:
Originally posted by BypassCatch22:
...I am so glad that hooters is outside the everyday laws of time and space.

Since time is in direct relation to gravity and gravity is determined by mass, does that mean time slows down the closer you get to CC.


Yes          

regards,
         steveo

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dbot on February 24, 2002, 02:10:00 AM
Just got back from seeing Chelsea at FlashDancers. As said elsewhere, if you're able to see her perform live, DO IT!! You'll be glad you did. Her chest is simply not to be believed.
Not only that, but she is wonderfully friendly and patient with the fans-- a really nice person who's willing to share a few words with the guys (and gals) who stop by.
Just my 2/100's of a buck,
Dbot
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 24, 2002, 02:36:00 AM
Quote - "Yes" - Close quote. Steveo

Maybe that doesn't help.  If a lap dance lasted 2 hours to a distant observer it would still seem like 10 minutes to the guy receiving the lap dance. Drat!

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: rick911 on February 24, 2002, 04:06:00 AM
I just recently read in a "potin" magaine that chelsea charms just explose because her breast clock the limit for her string implants..! its not too late !
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 24, 2002, 08:20:00 AM
Rick1111,

Any details?  I hope she didn't experience the problem that Dawn Whitham did, where her overstretched skin started to tear in several places, and she had to be rushed to the hosptial for emergency surgery.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on February 24, 2002, 03:09:00 PM
I believe Rick is making a joke.  I don't believe Chelsea is having any problems with her breasts.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hllywood_4_life on February 24, 2002, 03:58:00 PM
Chelsea Charms In NY, Read What Happens


I didn’t know that today would turn out to be such a wonderful day for me. Yes, you guessed it. Chelsea Charms is back in New York this week, and what to be expected, was MORE than expected. I was supposed to get out of work at 5pm today, but snuck out a half-hour early to avoid the 10 dollar door charge at 5. It’s not I’m cheap, just financially aware, and that the fact that I was going to try and spend as much on Chelsea that I can. You know the twist about this whole thing in meeting Chelsea?? It was that my girlfriend who I dearly love so much, wanted to come along and meet Chelsea Charms too. As a matter of fact, my girlfriend was more excited about seeing Chelsea than I was. My girlfriend bought a new dress, did her hair, and did her eyebrows. She did everything a woman would do to get prepared for a singles club or something. She never got this much prepared for me like this, and she says she loves me!!! (Love you too, baby) Well, I got there a couple of minutes before 5 to avoid the cover charge, and got me usual up front seat for the best possible view that I can. My girl was more energized than I was waiting for Chelsea. When 6:15 came around, all the other house dancers got off the stage, and lights were being flashed around the club cueing Chelsea performance beginning to start. The funny thing is, there were only four people up front, including my girl and I. Chelsea came out wearing a dark burgundy diva-like out fit with “I Will Survive” playing. Chelsea saw me, and smiled, then looked over to my girl, and said “You must be Vanessa?” I was like wow, she remember my girl’s name too. I looked at Chelsea, and I was definitely sure her breast had grown bigger since the last time I saw her a year ago last February. My girl was in shock seeing Chelsea’s breasts also. She’s seen pictures of her, but never imagined them to be that BIG!!! Chelsea put her hands on my shoulders, bent over and shook them in front me. I was like, WHOA!! But thought, what’s my girl thinking right now? Chelsea then started to do the same exact thing to my girl. My girl, Vanessa, look confused, puzzled, and disoriented with Chelsea’s boobs in her face. Vanessa didn’t know what the hell was going on and didn’t know how to react. Chelsea got up, from that and danced around again to the two others who had there dollars waving in the air, as I turned to my girl. She looked like she had just been hit by a truck. Well, I would say 2 trucks. After Vanessa got back to normal she just looked back at me, and than at Chelsea. I was having fun because my girl was having fun, and vice versa. Chelsea came back, shook her breast front of my girl, and I just took my cap and put it right next to her breast to see a comparison between my baseball cap, and her breasts. I was in awe. Chelsea took my cap, and tried to cover her right breast with it, but my cap was too small to cover anything. Chelsea then moved the cap to the top of her breast, and just left it there. I imagined my head as her breast with the cap on it, and that cap was at least 3 times too small for that one boob. All of this was so much fun. Chelsea, my girl, and I all having fun in the club. There was a point my girl was stuttering because of her boobs. I had fun teasing her about that. After Chelsea’s performance, we decided to talk to Chelsea. We had loads of fun talking, and I found that the two of them have much in common. Vanessa even bought Chelsea’s new video for me. This was all too much for me. There was this other guy who was there in envy of me. He was like, his wife woulda killed him. I love my girl.. It was a good day. I was a wonderful day. It was just great. Until next time. Hllywood_4_Life aka Ron Davis

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on February 26, 2002, 01:48:00 PM
Hllywood_4_Life --

DAMN! You DID have a good day!

So can you answer our physics question? Did Time speed up or slow down, the closer you got to Chelsea?


steveo

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 26, 2002, 11:27:00 PM
I guess I am answering my question here.AT her own forum Chelsea says she has a mountain of video orders to fill Enough said .Thanks,Scott
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 27, 2002, 04:26:00 AM
Steveo - Since time is realtive only a distant oberver might see changes in the movements of the person approaching Chelsea. To the person for which time is changing he is unaware that this is happening.  But then for Chelsea to not be slowed down by her own breast mass she couldn't function in the real world.
Point: Chelsea appears on video moving at a normal rate.  
Conçlusion: Chelsea's breast are not large enough to produce any changes in time or gravity.
Not yet anyway!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on February 27, 2002, 10:50:00 AM
heh heh...


steveo

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 27, 2002, 11:47:00 PM
i tried once to reach that site hooters.dk that many were mentioning but was hit with tons of porn pop-ups.  Can someone post the correct url to this site?

And, I also tried to go to Chelsea Charms Yahoo Club site with a link that was posted but got a page that said the area was restricted.  Can someone give me info on how to get to this Yahoo Club?

thanx for all the help,
breastlover

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sencho on February 28, 2002, 02:36:00 AM
If you found a lot of pop-ups, then you found the correct site.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 01, 2002, 02:36:00 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Sencho:
If you found a lot of pop-ups, then you found the correct site.  

how were you able to survive the "vicious attack of the porn pop-ups" and make it through to enjoy hooters.dk?

breastlover

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: peter on March 01, 2002, 05:16:00 PM
I think time slows down around CC untill she starts to do someting then time speeds up to incomprehensible velocity (i.e. time fly's by when your'e havin fun)(or when you have big breasts in your face)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sencho on March 02, 2002, 07:20:00 AM
quote:
Originally posted by breastlover:

how were you able to survive the "vicious attack of the porn pop-ups" and make it through to enjoy hooters.dk?

breastlover


I haven't as I don't like sites with pop-ups.  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: thunter on March 03, 2002, 04:08:00 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Sencho:

I haven't as I don't like sites with pop-ups.  


I use PopUp Killer. Properly configured, it is very useful for entering such sites.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 17, 2002, 07:41:00 AM
Just wanted to know if there are still a lot of people out there that have ordered her video and not received it yet. Seems like it is taking a long time. Thanks,Scott  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on March 17, 2002, 02:23:00 PM
I ordered it 3 weeks ago with a credit card.  Still waiting :-(

She needs to have on-line ordering for her web site.......

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 17, 2002, 03:09:00 PM
To GOCUBSGO: Check her website out .I suggested that on her forum.We will see what happens.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on March 20, 2002, 02:54:00 AM
i sent postal order from oz and got tape inside four weeks, which i thought was not too bad. Shame the tape is just so so though.
refer my review earlier in forum.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on April 01, 2002, 03:33:00 PM
From E! Entertainment News: Chelsea Charms, the feature dancer believed to have the biggest breasts in the world, overdosed in her home Sunday evening. Doctor Mae Kimsu Purbig has more on the story. "It appears as though Ms. Charms' current breast size was not the result of having implants. She had been taking pills. The pills in question, both Isis and Blousannt pills. She took them once a day, and soon she was taking them when she woke up, before and after each meal, and before she went to **82**. When Ms. Charms was omitted into the hospital, she confessed to swallowing 3 bottles of each product on Sunday. Chelsea appears to be okay, but we're going to keep her overnight to see what develops and how everything grows, umm..... goes."

This is Sloof Lirpa reporting.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sencho on April 01, 2002, 03:58:00 PM
Happy April to you too.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jayjay88 on April 01, 2002, 05:59:00 PM
I have to say i was worried at first!!
....jayjay
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Subgirlie on April 01, 2002, 11:44:00 PM
I am sorry, but that is just not funny.  Thank goodness it was only a prank.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Janus on April 02, 2002, 08:15:14 AM
Meh, April Fools. It really has no meaning anymore.

J- Wiggy, I didn't know the neck could bend that far. "Um, it can't he an alien."  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Vermillion on April 02, 2002, 08:26:32 AM
This is DEFINITELY not funny. I would sooner believe she beat herself to death with her boobs than this tripe.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Imaginos on April 02, 2002, 10:08:36 AM
Oh come one If you read his story she was supposedly taking 3 bottles of bloussant a day 3 bottles!!!!!

Janus - Cool Ryo'Ohki pic there what episode is that from.

Imaginos
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Janus on April 02, 2002, 09:10:23 PM
 No episode, it was either a fanart or something the artist did on a lark. I had no idea you were a Tenchi fan.

J- If Ted Nugent made a candy bar, would it be chocolate covered deer meat?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sencho on April 02, 2002, 09:11:03 PM
Oh come on, how can you not like Ryo-oh-ki?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Imaginos on April 03, 2002, 03:28:14 AM
Janus -

I have more involvement with Anime then you might suspect

Tenchi is one of my faves. The art is different from most OAV anime and its a great story. My favorite char is of corse Ryoko ~~~  Other fantastic series by the same designer is El Hazard. That one has got to be my most fav, though i like many of them.

Imaginos
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sencho on April 03, 2002, 06:10:11 AM
Gee, thanks Imaginos.  Just what I wanted, another reason to respect you.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Imaginos on April 03, 2002, 07:04:46 AM
LOL Sencho

You should all stop in the BE Loft on dalnet and get that room rocking again like it used to.

I'd be happy to discuss stuff like this when there, though i don't get in there as often as i'd like to.


Imaginos
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on April 03, 2002, 07:29:05 AM
You are one sick pussy, kopy kat.




....in a related story, Ron Jeremy's penis explodes!!!
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on April 03, 2002, 07:59:40 AM
Wassup everybody...I just can't help but to ask this question. I mean, really, as big as Chelsea is (is she pushing 70 inches or what?), is/are there any big-titters out there that are thinkin bout becomin bigger than Miss Chelsea? Minka? Mistress Rhiannon? Teddi Barrett? Anybody? I need info...thanks! Lata!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Bold_Dude on April 03, 2002, 03:20:33 PM
Actually, Imaginos, the story says she was taking the pills more and more often, and then on Sunday OD'd and took 3 bottles of each.  The implication of course being that this sudden intake of a Awful Lot of what had gotten her to this point would result in a surge of growth somewhere in the 'ohmygoodness' range.  Well, we can dream... and usually do.

Yay! Ryo-ohki!  I haven't seen all that much Tenchi, but I have seen a lot of 'stuff.'  Including walking in in the middle of El Hazard.  I really should get around to watching the whole thing sometime...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Imaginos on April 03, 2002, 03:44:43 PM
True but just reading the first line of his story showed that it was fake

I think you will like El Hazard if you watch it from the beginning.

Other great Animes are of course Jungle De Ikou...same designer as El Hazard. Record of Lodoss War was great. Saber Marionettes was pretty good too. Ranma 1/2 is pretty funny and the Oav's Ranma's pretty stacked. Vampire Princess Miyu is good for a mystery/fantasy/horror type of anime, somewhat serious type though.  Golden Boy is a riot with some good breast stuff.

Imaginos
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sencho on April 03, 2002, 10:42:07 PM
"though i don't get in there as often as i'd like to."

Why?  It's not like you're grinding yourself down running a large website or anyhing.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on April 04, 2002, 01:22:29 AM
i think its safe to deduce that every april 1 that something this outrageous comes up, you can pass it as a joke, hence "april fools day".  if it was a car accident, objectors may have been validated.  

kc just made a bunch of april fools out of you, thats all

JUGGSrnaut
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on May 02, 2002, 03:17:40 PM
She's 135XXX-22-34. I didn't write the link down but when I find it, I'll let you know.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on May 02, 2002, 03:24:05 PM
http://www.geocities.com/markttang/chelsea.html  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Old_Chestnut on May 02, 2002, 04:11:46 PM
    This follows in the (misleading) tradition of converting the bust measurement into metric.  At 2.54 centimeters to the inch (or 39.37 inches to the meter), this comes out as 53.15 inches*.  That's consistent with a remark I'd seen somewhere that Chelsea was now well over 50 inches...  

* This is nearly 86% of her height!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on May 02, 2002, 08:27:39 PM
Crap. Now I have to write a ticket...

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RDaneel on May 02, 2002, 09:59:21 PM
This was posted on her site over the weekend:Jan. 21-23I made a quick stop back home for several appointments including one with my boob doctor. He informed me that they’re still growing. I don’t know how much more I can take! They’re already the biggest; what more is there to prove? They’re over three times the original size of the 2500cc string implants I received in May of '99. The only drawbacks to ever-growing-boobs is the constant attention and monthly clothing purchases not to mention the latest: trouble with seeing my feet. I’ve adapted quite well to eating for the most part (more on that later), but walking around can sometimes be a challenge when you're feet disappear under your breasts.... So, 7500+cc's is how much?RD  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Lesbian Bob on May 02, 2002, 10:12:00 PM
I think she could be much larger than 53" because Tina Small was once measured at about 62".
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on May 03, 2002, 01:33:00 AM
You have Chelsea's mesurements?

You must really have a hard time finding clothes that fit!!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: hilarius on May 03, 2002, 05:01:33 AM
sheber
Chelsea's in charge here.  Sorry officer, but it would appear that YOU'VE been 'busted'.  In regards to my ticket, i believe I'm a criminal at 'large'.  Stop with all these 'false' accusations.  Don't try to pressure me with your 'long arm' of the law.  I have connections with local law enforcement.  I'm 'bigger than the state' police, and i've 'increased my' influence there as well.  Keep 'abreast' of the local by-laws, if you will.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Old_Chestnut on May 03, 2002, 07:27:58 AM
"So, 7500+cc's is how much?"  RD       At (2.2 pounds = 2.2 pints of water) = (1 kilogram = 1000 ml or cc of water), 7500 cc = 7.5 liters = 16.5 pints = 8.25 quarts = 2.1 gallons.  So 7500 cc of water has a mass of 7.5 kilos or a weight of 16.5 pounds; the same volume of fat would weigh about 12-13 pounds.  (Sorry, I don't know the average density of polypropylene string + fluid...)A sphere with a volume of 7500 cc has a diameter of 24.3 cm. or 9.6 inches ( close to 9-9/16 in., for the sake of meaningless precision).  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on May 04, 2002, 07:21:20 AM
I see you found my website! Notice the crushed soda can on the table. I'll let you guess what was dropped on the can!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on May 04, 2002, 07:28:31 AM
HaHaHa! Actually I have chelsea's measurements! If anybody here talks to her, have her give me a call.

http://www.geocities.com/markttang/chelsea.html  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Seelie on May 06, 2002, 01:47:06 AM
WOW! You have THE can from when Busty Heart appeared on The Man Show? Dude, that's quite a piece of TV history there. Treasure it always.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on May 07, 2002, 05:15:07 PM
The Chelsea Charms site that had the words
"Just when you thought they couldn't get any bigger" on it?
It was a free site and had some pics that Chelsea donated herself.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Mr Curiosity on May 07, 2002, 09:24:05 PM
If you mean my site, www.yourwinner-misscharms.com, then do not fret! It never went anywhere, and I have just updated this very day!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on June 04, 2002, 07:57:02 PM
http://www.chelseacharms.com/chasing.html

How far does she go on a "Private Dance" ?   Does she smother you with her heavenly hooters ?  Does she do "extras" ?   Curious to find out from any of you who have been alone with her for a "Private Dance"

Thanks !  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pacman on June 04, 2002, 08:12:33 PM
Check out the October 2001 issue of ThanksX3.1 located for free at this very site for a great report from Capper.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on June 05, 2002, 12:46:40 AM
holy crap Pacman, you are freaking lucky!!!!!!
i don't think Chelsea's going to go back to SF anytime soon huh? i went to the MSC website and i haven't seen Chelsea's name there...
hey what city are you in anyway Pacman?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pacman on June 05, 2002, 01:57:27 AM
That article was written by Capper.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on June 10, 2002, 09:18:12 PM
Well howdy everyone;
I am new here so be patient with me.  Just wondering if anyone has any of the newest Chelsea mov files and would like to share.  I expect anti-borrowing flames so fire away, if you want to share, please eMail me.

Thanks
Whin Dinkler  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on June 11, 2002, 02:21:18 AM
Welcome Windinkler.

All I've seen are several of her mpegs @ Photoclubs and her site.  You might try lucascb's Yahoo Group for Chelsea Charms. Someone might be able to direct you.

Good  hunting.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Vermillion on June 11, 2002, 10:46:37 AM
Of course somewhere between the last time i subscribed to a photoclub and when i subscribed recently they've made it to where you can view their video files online but you can download them(unless someone knows a way around this).

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 11, 2002, 02:13:24 PM
Vermillion. There most likely is a way around, are the clips linked with **10** to just pop up in a new media player sort of window to be played ????

You'd have to look at the code in the **10** and combin it with the members url.... than you could possibly even use a dowload manager to leech them ....

I'm not a photoclubs fan anyway, but it does work on some other paysites......
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrHHH on June 11, 2002, 04:20:00 PM
Quicktime has has a setting where you can save the movie in your cache. So turn that setting on, go view the movie, and then rummage though your cache looking for large movie files.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: editor on June 12, 2002, 08:27:14 AM
These Yahoo group movies are really good quality.  For those of you not in the mix here's a quick preview gif.  The file size is 1.9 MB and takes about 10.5 secs to load on a MAC.  PC? who knows? ...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Psf_79 on June 12, 2002, 04:59:38 PM
And the URL of the Group is..?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Harry Hood on June 13, 2002, 05:45:21 AM
yeah if you could post the url of the yahoo group that contains this movie, that would be great. I ran a search at yahoo for chelsea charms groups and it didn't come up with anything...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: editor on June 13, 2002, 06:29:36 AM
Try This Link:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chelsea-Charms-Big-Boobs  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Psf_79 on June 13, 2002, 01:48:46 PM
Thanks a lot editor! Great clips.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on June 13, 2002, 09:14:55 PM
Ermmmm
 thank you kindly for all your help gang but that particular yahoo-group doesn't exist, least ways no more.  Is this the work of the CC Nazis?  You know, those over-obsessive fans who are very protective of CC because they believe that on some distant planet they have a faint chance of hope in "doin" Chelsea?

Hope that group or another resurfaces!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Psf_79 on June 13, 2002, 09:26:40 PM
Obviously, the group got promptly deleted today. Weird, it worked just a few hours ago.

Maybe posting the URL here wasn't a good idea after all.

(feels a sting of guilt inside himself )
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on June 14, 2002, 02:50:35 PM
It's twenty bucks and I already know it's worth it. But how long is the vid?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: goblin on June 15, 2002, 02:04:02 PM
Kopy Cat
The video is 30 mins long and indeed well worth purchasing.
Not only for the one piece white body suit, but for the everyday striped pullover with slacks. The woman is simply stunning in this video.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on June 15, 2002, 06:14:22 PM
Actually, the time from the start of CC's intro till the start of the credits is about 27.5 minutes.

Glad you already know it's worth it.  Just received Chelsea's Vegas tape and even though it's longer and she's bigger I still like the Changing Chelsea vid the best of the 3 I've seen.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on June 15, 2002, 07:44:35 PM
First, relax.

I'm not referring to inches, centimeters, or any measurement of CC's bustline.  The largest complaint about her pics is the resolution.  Both her site and Photoclubs claim high resolution, but only deliver 50 - 90 kb.

Bosomquest.com (a new pic and video service of Photoclubs) now offers images with true high-er resolution. The ones I've seen were 139 to 270kb.

So far, the only models available are Sarenna, Colt45, and Chelsea.  In one of the vids Chelsea poses, walks, and runs (yes runs!).  The link is on the Photoclubs splash page.    
*Couldn't resist - I accept no responsibility for episodes of heart failure, CVA, mental collapse or any ill effects from the reading of the title.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on June 16, 2002, 01:39:51 AM
When I first joined Photoclubs the subject of hi-res video and streaming video was discussed, but dropped because the best technology of the time was expensive, still used huge amounts of bandwidth, and the decoder/player was often difficult for customers to install on their computers.  Fortunately with Windows Media Server and Player plus the DIVX codec the worst of those problems has fallen by the wayside, thus BosomQuest.

I'm really curious, though, as to the number of fans who will pony up $29.95 for the first month's viewing of a single video (or a $19.95 Photoclubs Membership + another $19.95 discount first month's viewing of one video).  Undoubtedly, Chelsea's videos will draw some customers, but I'm skeptical in the case of the other two models.

My comments are not intended to insult in any way, they're just market research on my own part about possibly offering something similar.  From my own experience, it's difficult  to get big bust fans to spend $29.95 on a 30 minute VHS video or on 15 minutes of one on one live video chat.  Charging that kind of price for a 5 or 10 minute streaming video clip ...  Comments ?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: editor on June 16, 2002, 01:41:13 AM
Hey Catch:This DivX network might have some great potential.  I did not pay for the films but I included some of the slices for the preview pages.




Is their some potential for a BEA DivX channel?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on June 16, 2002, 09:21:05 AM
Mel: Before shelling out that kind of money I would just buy (or rent) one of their videos.  You may well be right about the high price.Editor: Thanks a million for the larger pics!To both: Love your avatars!Clarification: The Bosomquest.com pics of Chelsea were uploaded by a newbie that didn't get  the memo.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on June 16, 2002, 11:15:50 AM
I am a member of the Chelsea photoclubs and out of curiousity I decided to shell out the additional $19.95 for one of the divx videos. I thought the quality was excellent, not to mention the content of the Chelsea video (the one I chose was the one of her in a massive white bra with her attempting to jog). But unlike Photoclubs with the photosets being updated twice a month, I didnt feel that Bosomquest was good value for the money. I would have loved to get all three of the videos for the extra $19.95 but to pay for each one separately was just a little too much. I think I would rather just buy a video a little more $$$ and keep it forever.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on June 24, 2002, 10:15:56 PM
Very curious to know how involved and intense Ms. Charms' private dance can get.....

http://www.chelseacharms.com/chasing.html

For you lucky ones out there: details PLEASE !!
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on June 24, 2002, 10:28:17 PM
Just found this from her Yahoo club:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chelseacharms2/

Message 7080 of 7084  
 
From:  smed9628
Date:  Sat Jun 22, 2002  6:47 pm
Subject:  Chelsea in Maine

"I went to see Chelsea in Portland the other day. It was quite a haul for me, coming from Canada, but hey, she never comes to Canada!  Anyway, the place was very big and busy when I arrived on Wednesday night. When Chelsea came out for her performance, the place got quiet when she stepped on stage. I think that is mostly because all jaws were on the ground! Including mine. She had on a business suit with a massive chest protrusion. There were several women at stage side which was interesting. Chelsea proceeded to strip down to a massive bra and panties with the crowd again in awe. She was truly gorgeous. They hand out $2 bills there for tipping (interesting) and guys started tipping for a face smacking! You get the idea! Then the top came off! Whoa! I tried to clap and get the crowd going,
but they were all mesmerized by her massive proportions. She must be used to that by now. Then she started the 'ride-4-five' routine, looking for someone to be the first. I jumped at the chance. Chelsea recognized me which was nice, and proceeded to get me lying correctly for the event. For those who don't know, you lie down on your back on the stage and Chelsea lays on top of you massaging her ample proportions on your face, then slithers down your chest to your crotch and continues her 'kneading' there! It is definitely worth $5! As expected, several guys (and girls!) followed suit after my experience. I was in a daze for several minutes. One of the women who got it, removed her own top for the duration! That was interesting!

Chelsea is really amazing on stage. Really worth seeing for sure. Now you may be wondering why I would go all that way for 1 show. Well I also had a Private Dance arranged for the next day! Now THAT was worth the trip!!! We met at her hotel room as arranged. I had flowers for her and she wore the blue dress from Photoclubs with the strings in front. WOW. Gentlemen, these are the largest breasts in the world! No question about it. For 1 hour you can enjoy these
massive beauties to your hearts content. And she is truly a
beautiful woman head to toe! Beautiful soft skin, soft spoken and pleasant! If you are wondering what goes on with a private dance, I can tell you it is exactly as stated - a private dance. The same thing that goes on in the VIP room at a club, but you are alone with CHELSEA in her room!!! That is the best part! Of course some clubs have rules about 6 feet, hands behind your back, no moving around.
These rules don't apply here, thank you very much.

I am now recovering from my 2 days with Chelsea. It may be some time before I can resume a normal life!!!!

Cheers!


 


 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on June 25, 2002, 04:19:35 AM
i really wish i could go to one... on the schedule on her website, the closest place she'll come to me is LA, but i'm up in SF; yeah same state but still pretty damned far away... and not having a car really does ruin everything...
do any of you live in or near the places where she will be visiting?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on June 25, 2002, 01:57:08 PM
Chelsea's schedule:

http://www.chelseacharms.com/chasing.html

July 18
PRIVATE DANCES
(no club appearance)
Houston, Texas

---------------------------------------
July 19 - 20
PRIVATE DANCES
(no club appearance)
Seattle, Washington

---------------------------------------
July 23
PRIVATE DANCES
(no club appearance)
Washington, D.C.

---------------------------------------
July 26 - 27
PRIVATE DANCES
(no club appearance)
Indianapolis, Indiana

---------------------------------------
Aug 2-3
PRIVATE DANCES
(no club appearance)
Los Angeles, California

---------------------------------------
Aug 26-31
Exotic Dancer Expo and FanFair
Las Vegas, Nevada

---------------------------------------
Sept 20-21
PRIVATE DANCES
(no club appearance)
Chicago, Illinois

---------------------------------------
Sept 27-28
PRIVATE DANCES
(no club appearance)
New York, New York

---------------------------------------
Oct 25-26
PRIVATE DANCES
(no club appearance)
Detroit, Michigan
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveZ on June 25, 2002, 05:24:36 PM
Wow, she's coming to DC.

How much does a private dance cost?

Steve Z
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on June 25, 2002, 06:19:09 PM
400 - 30 mins    750 - 60 mins  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 26, 2002, 01:08:59 AM
While it is "private", does that automatically imply *one* person only?  I don't know how much a private/lapdance at a club is with Chelsea (and I figure it kinda varies depending on the location.)  But @ $750/60min, I wouldn't mine paying say 1/4th of that and pooling together 4 buddies of mine, and each kinda/sorta getting a quarter-hour for $187 (although we'd probably all chip in $200, and call the extra $50 a tip for Chelsea - I'm sure she's worth that, and way lots more.)

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 21, 2002, 06:58:46 PM
Here is a pic I found in the User Gallery over at www.hooters.dk .  It should help us appreciate the degree of change that Chelsea's bosom has undergone right before our eyes.

Does anyone have any news on Chelsea?  Haven't heard anything about her her in a while.  Just so you all know too, shes going back out on a Private Dance tour soon.  You can see her schedule at her website: www.chelseacharms.com .
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 21, 2002, 07:08:22 PM
Three years of growth...and she hasn't stopped yet!

Truly Doc Johnson's best advertisement for the efficacy of "silly string"...if only the FDA were listening!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 21, 2002, 07:16:03 PM
yeah, i wonder if the picture to the right is even an up to date one (hoping not ).  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: subcom on August 21, 2002, 07:48:06 PM
To get a different perspective, check out the discusson on
www.implantinfo.com

They just discovered Chelsea and their comments are amusing.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 21, 2002, 08:22:56 PM
i think this is all that subcom is referring to:
http://www.implantinfo.com/cgi-local/index.cgi?read=564232

looks like chelsea is on par with dolly parton's celbrity status, or at least as frontage is concerned.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: subcom on August 22, 2002, 12:34:39 AM
No, what I was refering to is here:

http://www.implantinfo.com/cgi-local/archive.cgi?read=562726

Their discussion has already rolled over to their archive and is no longer on the main board.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 22, 2002, 02:23:04 AM
threads like that just irritate the shit out of me.  really considering posting a retort in defence of what cc or any other woman for that matter does.  by some of the posters' rationale there, them having breast jobs themselves makes them all prostitutes.  just plain stupid.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: subcom on August 22, 2002, 03:45:55 AM
Well, I try to take their opinions with a grain of salt.  Most were negative, but there were a few defenders.  But they are, after all, a bunch of flat chested women debating over whether a C cup is too big.  Naturally, Chelsea is way beyond their mind set.  However, one was stating Chelsea was doing XXX videos, which we know is not true.  So their opinions carry a lot less weight when they are founded on falsehoods.

I found it amusing that they didn't think anyone could find Chelsea's chest attractive.  If they only knew  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Seelie on August 22, 2002, 04:12:09 AM
To be fair, the only one who said anything about **31** said that XXX videos should legally be considered **31**, but admitted that they currently aren't. As stated above though, the person did mistakenly accuse Chelsea of magin hardcore vids. And sadly, they also assume that she's rich. I kinda wish it were that easy for our favorite models to make as much money as these people think they can. Sigh.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 22, 2002, 04:16:02 AM
same here.  they put themselves out to the limit (surgery, long tours, threat of stalkers, etc).  too much hard work/risk, not enough money imo.

now that i think of it, the prudes' comments over at implantinfo just deserve to be ignored.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Old_Chestnut on August 22, 2002, 05:41:45 AM
> yeah, i wonder if the picture to the right is even an up to date one

   It came from BosomQuest.com originally (I oughta know:  I put that comparison together), so I don't think it can be all *that* old...  [I checked it against numerous other photos of CC, and it's pretty definitely from sometime this year.  In fact, if it was taken somewhere in MN, it looks like it might have been late May or June...]

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Character Zero on August 22, 2002, 06:16:46 AM
Has the link gone dead for anyone else?
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Psf_79 on August 22, 2002, 06:29:26 AM
Yup. Can't get there either.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on August 22, 2002, 12:01:21 PM
links not dead i'm there now. pasted from above http://www.implantinfo.com/cgi-local/archive.cgi?read=563098  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 22, 2002, 01:18:11 PM
well great comparison!  thanks for putting it together.  shows really well the degree of chelsea's change.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: seinz on August 22, 2002, 02:13:25 PM
That's sad that Chelsea doesnt come here (like Christine Allure, for example...)  I am sure that we would have a lot of questions for her!!  

Does anyone know a link to a "serious" interview that she did...  I say serious, because I think that a lot of big breasts entertainers do not always tell the truth in their FAQs and interview...  Sometimes, they say things to be more "attractive"... but that another debate!

Seinz  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on August 22, 2002, 05:41:25 PM
there are 2 threads actually, maybe even more, but i only read through 2 of them:

the one you posted above and
http://www.implantinfo.com/cgi-local/archive.cgi?read=562731




here are some funny comments(out of the many ignorant negative and hateful ones...):

"How does she find clothes? How does she **82**? How many cc s is that anyway? They have to be heavy and cause back pain. How do you get that size without bottoming out?"

"The only way to prevent bottoming out of those things is to encase them in some sort of steal framing system??"

"I wonder if she has some kind of expandables in that she fills up for photos"

"... I didn't realize someone had had the entire atlantic sucked into her chest"

"Wow. All other considerations aside, isn't it amazing how much skin will stretch?"

"They look kinda Fake to me" (what does fully fake look like to this person?!)

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Psf_79 on August 22, 2002, 06:56:07 PM
I read all those comments, and all I can say is: those people make me sick. Rarely have I seen so much intolerance and hostileness in one place. This might be rude on my part, but that bunch is acting like a group of nazis talking about jews or extreme right-wing christians talking about gays. Check this example:
"I DON'T CARE HOW NICE SHE IS, MY JUDGEMENT OF HER IS THAT SHE'S A FREAK & I'M DAMN WELL INTITLED TO IT!!!"
Truly, truly disgusting.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveZ on August 22, 2002, 07:02:09 PM
One thing that struck me about that message board is that none of those women can fucking spell.

Steve Z
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: 100ProofBE on August 22, 2002, 07:52:40 PM
In reply to:

One thing that struck me about that message board is that none of those women can fucking spell




     In their defense, it seems as though no one knows how to spell anymore. (especially on message boards) Personally, I don't find Chelsea's breasts particularly attractive, but to each his own. Women tend to get catty like that when confronted with something or someone men find sexy. Fact of life.

Proof out.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrHHH on August 22, 2002, 07:58:29 PM
I don't know about that Prof. People around here and the other message boards I visit make an attempt to spell correctly.

Maybe we just have too much time on our hands.

Anyway, I read the whole thread and I'm glad someone pointed out that she's using the special string implants.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tman on August 22, 2002, 08:27:30 PM
What I see in those posts is a lot of ignorance and prejudice. We shouldn´t judge people by their looks or the size of their breasts.

Tman.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on August 22, 2002, 09:25:57 PM
i agree 100%

but then, we aren't exactly perfect either... what would you think they would say if they read that Gwen Stefani thread here?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: mrmethane on August 22, 2002, 10:28:34 PM
Is someone in our glass house throwing stones? Hmmm...
As much as I disagree with the misinformation and opinions of the people at that board, those are their opinions and they're entitled to them. And I'm entitled to disagree with them. Welcome to America.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tux on August 22, 2002, 11:10:57 PM
Yes, most people on the net don't even make a decent attempt at spelling things correctly or somehow think that it's stylish to write things a certain way ("Cn U du that 4 meh" "Wat R U doing 2day").  I mean, you don't have to type the way you speak.  It's a conversation not a vanity plate.  Don't get me started on ToGglE cAsE people (they all need new keyboards since the Caps Lock or Shift Key is obvious on the fritz) and the 1337 5P34|< people.

However, done for comedic purposes (like sounding **92**), it's fine since it's not all of the time (well, not usually all of the time).
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HarmonyBliss on August 23, 2002, 04:13:03 AM
If I knew by going large like Chelsea would be good business and I'd make good $$$ by touring, photo shoots, and doing custom fan stuff, I would consider trying to find a set of custom-made 4000cc silicone implants to go to the huge size. They'd have to pay themselves off within the first year, though. The unfortunate thing is it probably wouldn't be financially worth it.

I can understand Christine Allure's dilemma when she posted here recently.

If I could find the right investor(s) I'd consider the 4000 cc+ range.

I respect all the big-bust girls who get out there and tour and who do alot of work because I know the big-bust feature business is not it used to be. It's much harder now and not as lucrative. These girls who are today's big-bust stars work really hard to entertain the fans,  and they do alot of travel and constantly touring with their shows.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on August 23, 2002, 06:35:20 AM
Hi Harmony.   While 4000cc implants sound huge, in fact they are not big enough to win the biggest bust title, and capture the fanatical fan business that goes with the title of the world's biggest busted feature.   I'm absolutely certain that with your face and body that you would draw LOTS of attention with 4000cc, get lots of magazine and video offers etc.  You would also probably do very well with a personal pay website.  Undoubtedly you would get as many big tit feature booking as you wanted.

However, you mentioned that the 4000cc implants must pay for themselves in a year.  This is not going to be probable with just the implants themselves.  As you already know, nude magazine and video work may lead to lots of publicity and acclaim, but in and of themselves they do not produce much income.  You also probably know that there are really only about four dance clubs nationwide that pay big bucks for big tits, and that any one model can only book into these same four clubs perhaps 3 or at most 4 times a year.  Given that you will likely lose at least 6 weeks of work recuperating and becoming photogenic again after the surgery, that leaves 3*4 or 12 big bucks dance club bookings versus 6 weeks of total loss of income while recuperating plus the cost of the surgery.  Throw in a few nude magazine and video appearances during that first year, and you're still in the red versus not having gotten the implants and lost the 6 weeks of income.

However, there are other things you can do to turn the financial picture around, if you have the necessary commitment.  The first is accepting feature bookings in less famous clubs.  However, this means lots more time on the road for significantly less money than the four 'famous big tit feature clubs'.  If you would commit to travelling 36 to 40 weeks out of the first year it would definitely turn the red implant ink to black.

XXX video work would also tilt the financial scales.  Every XXX video is probably equal to about two weeks on the road featuring.  If you do them for an established producer it creates instant income via a one time acting fee, and also produces nationwide publicity via the adult video stores.  On the other hand, if you produce them and sell them yourself they keep producing income every time you sell another copy (but without the initial large amount of cash that the acting fee would bring).

Perhaps the best money for the least effort these days comes from doing 'private shows'.  However, this typically involves, for starters, entertaining fans one on one in a hotel room.  Doing private shows without reservations could pay off your implants in a matter of a couple of months!

From a business standpoint, there is always the subject of risk management.  With implants that large, there is a fairly high rate of complications.  How prepared would you be if you were forced to have your new implants removed as the result of a serious complication ?  More importantly, how prepared will you be to come up with the cash for a second set of 4000cc implants once those complications have cleared up after 3 to 6 months (and with virtually no income during that period) ?

The risk of implant complications potentially causing a total loss of earning power plus the possibility that you will not be willing or able to follow through on road work and other income producing activities is going to make finding an investor a real challenge.  This is made even worse by the alleged saga of Kleevco & Chelsea Charms, where (according to the Kleevco side anyhow) a large investment was made in Chelsea by Kleevco both in terms of some implant expenses as well as career promotion, but with the business relationship (and recovery of their investment) terminated by Chelsea as soon as her career started to take off.

I'm definitely not trying to dissuade you in any way from getting 4000cc implants, in fact just the opposite.  It's very probable that you will become a major star as a result, and will recover your investment eventually.  But recovering that investment in a year would require commitments on your part which you may not be comfortable doing or may simply not be physically able to do for sustained periods.  Also, the surgery itself does carry the risk of complications such that you might not only lose the benefits of your new 4000cc implants, but you may also find yourself with no implants whatsoever and therefore without any of the income sources that you currently have.  It CAN happen, which is bad enough if you are financially prepared for the possibility.  However, it can be downright tragic if a girl has invested every dollar she can lay her hands on into a new set of huge implants only to 'lose them' to complications a few weeks or months later along with all previous sources of income.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Connoisseur on August 23, 2002, 07:54:51 AM
Absolutely fascinating, totally engrossing post.

Melonie, if you collected these gems, you'd have the beginnings of a splendid MBA or Ph.D. thesis or, at the very least, an exceedingly informative industry handbook.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 23, 2002, 02:30:38 PM
Hi everyone, and I must say I think this is a very interesting post, first off I think Chelsea's look is amazing!! very top heavy yet still slim and a very attractive face. I believe it is these three factors that make her so sucessful not just the "largest breasts" tag. I personally think that a girl like Harmony for instance who has two of the factors could be as sucessful by going to a very large size which isnt to say she would have to be bigger than Chelsea. Look at Minka, probably the second largest yet also very popular, why? attractive face slim figure and the huge implants! I think that a new girl with a pay site and some implants in the region of 4000cc could be sucessful although I conceed that I am biased to the fact that I would like to see a new girl. I mean the whole huge-fake breast loving public cant have just dissapeared? I am still  amazed that no girls have really made an impact in Europe and the UK Ashley Bond is some times around but not much and Alicia Douval is portrayed in the papers as some IT girl wanna be??? but I think there would be enough cash to be made off of touring strip clubs in London and Germany (especially) and the slot on Euro trash for a really big european girl to be sucessful. Finally people are always saying that there isnt a demand for the big girls in the clubs except for the big four as Melonie pointed out but I would love to see a show like that here in the UK and there are always people going mad to see the large girls on this forum so perhaps the platform for them isnt there, I mean how would a chain of strickly Huge fake chest girls do with a frachise across the us and some in the UK and Europe??? Just a thought.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 23, 2002, 02:30:53 PM
Hi everyone, and I must say I think this is a very interesting post, first off I think Chelsea's look is amazing!! very top heavy yet still slim and a very attractive face. I believe it is these three factors that make her so sucessful not just the "largest breasts" tag. I personally think that a girl like Harmony for instance who has two of the factors could be as sucessful by going to a very large size which isnt to say she would have to be bigger than Chelsea. Look at Minka, probably the second largest yet also very popular, why? attractive face slim figure and the huge implants! I think that a new girl with a pay site and some implants in the region of 4000cc could be sucessful although I conceed that I am biased to the fact that I would like to see a new girl. I mean the whole huge-fake breast loving public cant have just dissapeared? I am still  amazed that no girls have really made an impact in Europe and the UK, Ashley Bond is some times around but not much and Alicia Douval is portrayed in the papers as some IT girl wanna be??? but I think there would be enough cash to be made off of touring strip clubs in London and Germany (especially) and the slot on Euro trash for a really big european girl to be sucessful. Finally people are always saying that there isnt a demand for the big girls in the clubs except for the big four as Melonie pointed out but I would love to see a show like that here in the UK and there are always people going mad to see the large girls on this forum so perhaps the platform for them isnt there, I mean how would a chain of strickly Huge fake chest girls do with a frachise across the us and some in the UK and Europe??? Just a thought.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on August 23, 2002, 05:02:04 PM
More than once I have tried to put together some European club dates in conjunction with European TV offers which have come my way, in an effort to get the income versus expenses equation at a reasonable level to justify travelling there for a week.   Every time the answer comes back the same - no clubs are really willing to part with a significant feature fee for 'just' a huge boobed dancer.  While I know very well that there are a handful of serious big boob fans from Europe, they just don't seem to be concentrated enough in a single area to make huge boobs an income producing option for European club owners.  Besides, the sex aspect of many European clubs causes the owners to think on an entirely different wavelength in regard to features who won't perform live sex acts on stage, huge boobs or not!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 24, 2002, 03:55:29 PM
Does anyone have the picture of Chelsea at CES where she is standing with Minka and Kayla?  I think they were backstage.  I couldn't find it posted at hooters.dk anywhere.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 24, 2002, 04:07:18 PM
I think she has one of those pictures at her Yahoo! Group: try groups.yahoo.com/chelseacharms I think.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: mrmethane on August 24, 2002, 06:08:20 PM
Or Crazy Jose's gallery here at the BEA!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on August 24, 2002, 09:58:01 PM
    We went to see Chelsea's first show as a feature at NY Dolls (near what is now ground zero in NYC)and a freind of ours asked if we'd gotten a glimpse of her yet because she was over the top huge. She was then, and she is even moreso now, but what makes her so appealing is not just her size, but how she carries herself despite having to bear the burden of hauling herself around. She seems to enjoy them actually, which may to some degree be true, but there must be (alot of) times when she just wishes she could remove them, and run to the store for a loaf of bread without having to endure the boorish comments from blundering oafs, and catty women. More recently at Flashdancers we were all hanging out talking and laughing and we of course brought up the BE archive. She said that when she first started featuring, she saw morphs of herself that made her look as big as she is today, which she thought was kind of funny.
     Having said all that, we can definately say that although her boobs are huge, and her face is gorgeous, the best thing about Chelsea is Chelsea. If any of you get the chance to go see her, she's amazing to watch, and even better to talk with.

                       -D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 24, 2002, 10:34:48 PM
thanks for the advice d&j.  next time she comes by the northeast, boston or nyc for that matter, ill be sure to check her out.  do you know if she comes up here often?  i was gonna see her in portland, me a couple yrs back, but couldnt make it, but ive never heard of her making it to the boston area.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 25, 2002, 04:39:40 PM
Thanks, guys.  I'll check those sites out.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Scotty on August 25, 2002, 04:51:31 PM
Maybe you should look again

www.hooters.dk --> pictures --> Conventions --> CES2000 --> CES Pictures - New uncut version -->

CES2000-019.jpg
CES2000-068.jpg
CES2000-069.jpg
CES2000-080.jpg
CES2000-787.jpg
CES2000-790.jpg
CES2000-791.jpg  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on August 26, 2002, 03:45:16 PM
You can check out a clip at her website:

http://www.chelseacharms.com/checkerboard.html

WOW !!!!!!!!!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Character Zero on August 27, 2002, 03:28:11 PM
All the links in the post regarding the Chelsea Charms discussion have gone dead.  Has it been removed or something?  If not could someone please post a working link or maybe some key word from the thread's title so I could search for it on implantinfo.com?  Thanks.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on August 27, 2002, 03:34:42 PM
just cut and paste thats what i did
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 27, 2002, 10:09:40 PM
try doing a search for "chelsea", "charms", or a conjunction of the two.  something is bound to pop up, or in chelsea's case, bust out.  

it is also possible however that the site has restricted outside references to pages, probably due to the increased traffic we were generating.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on August 29, 2002, 03:25:28 PM
I'm going to place my order today :-)

Will post reviews after watching the tape.......  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: tndvrs on August 29, 2002, 04:21:26 PM
If you want your avatar animated U can use this perheps.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on August 30, 2002, 06:13:19 AM
It's not as good as "Changing Chelsea". The audio quality is non-existant and the video quality is only fair; however, Chelsea's larger breast almost make up the difference. IMHO.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 31, 2002, 01:10:09 AM
Whats up my fellow big tit lovers. I gotta question for you. Who's BIGGER, Chelsea or Maxi?
And whose tits would you rather suck? And which one would you rather have give you a titfuck?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on August 31, 2002, 04:17:19 AM
Currently, Chelsea seems to have a slight edge.  Maxi had some fluid removed from her breasts recently because of pain from the continual growth from the string implants.

Choosing between them for an encounter in paradise?
A gentleman never reveals such things, but talk about breaking out in a cold sweat while you make up your mind!!?!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: cynic on August 31, 2002, 11:51:04 AM
Oh I think Chelsea's definitely got this one.  Maxi "drained" while Chelsea "grew" some more this year!  I just don't know how Chelsea's poor little back can take it.  I wonder if she got one of those steel rods placed in her spine too.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on August 31, 2002, 12:27:19 PM
Let's not forget the frames that those accessories are on too.

Maxi in nigh on 6 feet tall, which gives them accessories an aweful high perch and because of that, when you compound weight with actual movement and get into the inertia of those puppies in motion and the stress that it play on her upper back, across the shoulder blades, and then lower back ... well the stress on her back would be greater than chelsea with the same size boobs.

Chelsea has a slightly shorter torso, and of course much shorter legs (cause that's where most of a person's height is) which keeps her center of gravity lower thus reducing stress.  It's all weight and balance.

But what am I saying?  Hell I'd carry 'em for either one of those hunnies!  Either one of them gorgeous women is like life in paradise!

Party on, Garth

Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on August 31, 2002, 12:29:27 PM
I think Chelsea is still the biggest, we might get some comparison pics from the Fan Fair, if we are lucky. Also, I can't find it, but I am sure I read in some thread here that Maxi had some serum removed from just one of her breasts, because it was growing faster than the other...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Brabuster67 on September 05, 2002, 05:32:10 AM
I think too much Chelsea is impossible. She is the biggest best and sexiest out there and I would venture to suggest the most favoured by the BEA dudes.  I there are rare pics of her out there lets get them posted so we can all see em.
Cheers
BSB  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on September 05, 2002, 06:21:00 AM
You are correct sir! (IMHO)As far as being a BEA favorite a lot of members are turned off by the missplacement of her nipples and other problems.  Not me!  I think she is the first obvious example of true, self contained BE.Too much Chelsea is never enough.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Candye Man on September 06, 2002, 11:52:48 PM
Well, you're right about some members not being turned on by Chelsea.  It's not just the off-center nipples.  Her skin is now so tight she's got this veiny thing going on, especially in her right boob.   And in a number of photos, her breasts don't have that perfectly-round shape (like most fake tits), but are beginning to look -- for lack of a better term -- lumpy or uneven.  (See attachment.)
 
No disrespect intended to her legions of fans.  I can appreciate how you can admire her sheer size, but I have trouble getting past the other stuff.  They just look too, I don't know, distorted.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Glottis on September 07, 2002, 12:56:45 AM
they look good under a sweater.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: F_Cup_Fitzgerald on September 07, 2002, 01:10:20 AM
I'm with you, CandyeMan. They look freakish--and hard as two rocks. Chelsea's body is not close to being an object of lust for me. (However, I DID recently see a picture of Chelsea before she'd ever had surgery, back when she "only" had about a natural D-cup. She was BEAUTIFUL.) Mark my words, one day, during a photo session, she's going to take off her bra, there'll be a tremor, a rumble, an explosion, and everyone within 20 feet will be covered in whatever she packs those things with. She won't even be left with "D's."  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Vermillion on September 07, 2002, 02:51:26 AM
Apparently some people don't know much of anything.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on September 07, 2002, 04:04:25 AM
Hasn't anyone heard of the phrase "To each his own."

And secondly, why bother posting in this thread if you don't like Chelsea.  That's like me posting in a thread about Norma Stitz and saying how much I dislike her.  I personally don't like her, but that doesn't mean I have to let the world know how much I don't. It's just a waste of mine and everyone else's time.  It's posts like the above that start stupid and pointless Flaming wars.


Now on the subject:

I personally like Chelsea.  Not just because of her assets, but because of her personallity and attitude.  She always comes off as being very friendly and full of energy.  Plus everyone whose met her have nothing bad to say about her.

After watch her in her Exotic Expo video, I was in awe of her persona.  Very giddy and playful, like a happy **09**.  It's this persona that made me and my fiancee dub Chelsea the "Elf Girl".

==

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: F_Cup_Fitzgerald on September 07, 2002, 02:33:00 PM
But I *do* like Chelsea. Like I said above, I think she's beautiful. I'd really like to find a picture of how she looked before the implants, because that's how I think she looks the best. I never called her an ugly hag. Just the opposite--I was expressing my preference (at least in Chelsea's case) that she'd look better WITHOUT the enormous fake breasts.

And I *liked* the smiley with the outstretched middle fingers, BTW, Vermilion; I thought it was hilarious.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Candye Man on September 07, 2002, 02:49:47 PM
I agree, to each his own.  Like I said, I wasn't trying to diss anyone who likes Chelsea.  I was just agreeing with Catch when he said that some folks don't like the way her boobs look.

I also agree that they look much better under a sweater or shirt.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: the1_roadrunner on September 07, 2002, 04:21:51 PM
She's a little over the top for my taste but I believe in the motto....."different strokes for different folks"  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on September 08, 2002, 05:38:49 AM
About her looking better in a sweater or shirt:  That occured to me before entering the forum.  With breasts as gigantic as that even Chelsea's fans enjoy her clothed shots as much as the nude ones.  That's the reason for the video "Changing Chelsea".  It was in direct response to hundreds of fans wanting to see her in several different outfits.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: thunter on September 08, 2002, 12:46:21 PM
I met Chelsea once at a show here in my area. I can't say enough about how fun a show she put on and how terrific a person she seems to be. I've had plenty of "If only ..." moments when thinking about her.

She can ride on the back of my Harley any time she wants!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Vermillion on September 08, 2002, 01:02:34 PM
Well....FCup when i calmed down i thought i went too far with that smiley so i removed it. No offense intended.

Catch....In actuality ALL the models i prefer to see clothed rather than nude.....it makes them look more interesting(depending on the outfit) IMHO.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on September 09, 2002, 05:51:43 AM
Have you ever noticed that any girl looks bigger in a tight top than nude?  Is that an illusion are am I just completely crazy (instead of just 3/4ths)?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: FlowHcnum on September 09, 2002, 07:40:10 AM
Can we choose both?

-Flow "srezwow dna pot thgit taht ot sepirts dda ..." Hcnum
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tesseract on September 09, 2002, 09:04:47 PM
FlowHcnum, I just wanted you to know that I had a real bad day today and you just made it a bit lighter... Thanx dude  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on September 09, 2002, 09:15:56 PM
Flow,
why the backwards talk?  any reason?  caught me off guard/entertained me, thought i was listening to an iron maiden song.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: FlowHcnum on September 09, 2002, 10:59:54 PM
What backwards talk?

-Flow "Tuoba gniklat er'uoy tahw wonk t'nod I" Hcnum
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Chestnuts on September 10, 2002, 12:02:27 AM
 I think maybe MunchWolf has fallen into the other side of the tenretni. !tuo mih pleH .namow siht yb dezitonpyh neeb s'eH  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: homevintner on September 10, 2002, 12:43:06 AM
I'd be mezmerized for certain.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tesseract on September 10, 2002, 02:23:10 AM
"You have reached the end of the Internet.
 You have seen all there is to see.
 Please go back....... Now."  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: F_Cup_Fitzgerald on September 10, 2002, 04:11:17 AM
I'm mesmerized counting the number of triangles in Tesseract's avatar. I think I see 32.

And squares. I think there are 18.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Character Zero on September 10, 2002, 04:12:26 AM
OK, here's my two cents, if anyone cares...

I *do* admire Chelsea for her pure size, but I also think that her boobs are looking kind of distorted.  What I really like are pictures of Chelsea wearing some kind of sexy top, tight sweater, or big bra.  This hides the distortion while still displaying her incredable size.  Also, I personally find it even sexier when a little is left to the imagination.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on September 10, 2002, 04:59:22 AM
Hey Tesseract! Don't I get any credit!Purposely left myself wide open with the self-derecating humor. Straight men never get any respect.No one has answered the question about clothed looking larger than topless.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on September 10, 2002, 06:01:35 AM
Don't worry, Catch, I noticed it too.  I think it's a combination of the clothing being stretched, and the overall continuous "hill" shape it gives.  

I've come to notice that many times girls will also appear larger on TV than in photos.  For example, Crystal Gunns' breasts always looked like they fit her body type in any photo I saw.  But when she was on Jenny Jones, she looked extremely huge.

==

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on September 11, 2002, 03:51:18 AM
that's because seeing something in motion is much different than seeing a still image of it...

like don't you remember those "3D" stereoscopes (or called something like that) where there are two pictures, one slightly to the left or right of the other, to mimic the binocular vision that we have with our two eyes. those were supposed to imitate a 3D look that we can get with our two eyes, but with static pictures, we get the depth but no volume, so they end up looking like cardboard cut outs in front or in back of each other.
but, in moving pictures, or what we now call movies, if the same technique was used, we do get the sense of the volume as well as the depth, since the objects move and move around and we can see the objects in different angles instead of in that same static angle that you'd get in a photo.

well... i just got that from my art teacher just earlier today and since that little peice of info just happens to have so much to do with this thread, i knew i just had to share that with all of you
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on September 11, 2002, 04:50:19 AM
Thanks Strider and Jizztits.

Your right about TV and photos.  As soon as I saw LA Bust and Leanna Lovelace in a video it was obvious that Score subscription would never be renewed. Big Bust mags were suddenly obsolete.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Seelie on September 12, 2002, 06:28:41 PM
Jizz, have you seen any of Samu's morphs? He makes these awesome images where you cross your eyes to make 'em 3d. Great stuff.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ac man on September 12, 2002, 11:25:07 PM
if your a member of chelsea's site, check out her interview
with a radio station, on her newsletter page, its pretty cool!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on September 12, 2002, 11:40:17 PM
JMHO, everyone's free to their opinions and everyone's free to express them. If one fella starts a thread publicly praising a particular model, movie or whatever, then anyone else is well within their rights to offer a contrary opinion/view/experience on that subject. As long as all thread participants are behaved and treat each other with respect, there's no problem with disagreement whatsoever.

I suppose that if a member wanted to post praise and specifically asked that no one reply with a dissenting opinion, they'd be within their rights to do so. Of course, it would be up to other members as to whether or not they'd honor the request (to say nothing at all if they have nothing nice to say).

For the record, I'm not Chelsea's biggest fan and would probably have liked her more pre-implant. I did recently watch her debut video and was impressed with her personality, smile and charm even if she was nervous. Her boobs looked slightly less surreal in the video than in recent pix I've seen. I've got absolutely nothing against disproportionately huge implants, but sometimes the shape/form/etc... detracts from the appeal imparted by sheer size.

Again, JMHO.

Palomine
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on September 13, 2002, 01:45:12 AM
hey Seelie, well i haven't seen Samu's morphs.. but i've seen those Magic Eye and that type of art where you cross your eyes to produce hidden/3D images.. is that what his morphs are like?

and back to Chelsea... i honestly have never seen what she looked like pre-BE... i've only seen her as big as she is now... would i just be put into shock if i were to see how much smaller she was back then?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on September 13, 2002, 05:02:58 AM
Take a look at the Chelsea composites in the user gallery now.  Pay attention to the one in B & W.  Be prepared to be flabergasted!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ju66l3r on September 13, 2002, 09:50:06 PM
I'm in the "freakishly uneven and hard" camp...but I did want to comment on something Fitzgerald said:

Mark my words, one day, during a photo session, she's going to take off her bra, there'll be a tremor, a rumble, an explosion, and everyone within 20 feet will be covered in whatever she packs those things with.

LMAO!  It'll be like someone opened a fake can of peanut brittle when the string implants come out....SPROOOIIIINNGOINGOING...

--The Juggler  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on September 14, 2002, 05:07:36 AM
Just curious.  Do you and F-cup have a popping girls fetish.

Thanks for that horrific vision indelibly impressed on my mind.  Don't do it again!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RHIC on September 14, 2002, 07:18:07 AM
Is it an audio track or something?  Can we see a transcript?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Prophet_Tenebrae on September 14, 2002, 09:08:25 AM
I'm guessing it'll go something like this

Interviewer: So Chelsea, great to have you on the show.
CC: Thanks!
Interviewer: Mmm, your breasts are so big *drool*
etc.

Sorry if that spoilt the surprise.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on September 14, 2002, 12:39:59 PM
That's not quite how it goes...but it's really nice and candid.  She talks about the procedures she went through, natural D-Cup, went larger then to double-bags (2 in each 'breast pocket' and then to the experimental silly-string procedure.

The interesting thing was telling how she found out about it, wanting to be a really big chested feature she checked around with a bunch of agents and heard about it and then went for it.  She talked about the subsequent growth and how she hadn't intended to go that big and that it's not a long term thing.

She said that she wanted to be really big, do very well financially and get out of it with something to show for it.  Now that's the words of a very intelligent woman.

She didn't give an indication of how long she is going to stay as big (and bigger and bigger) as she is but I'd say we can count on a couple/few more years yet.

Anyhow, it's a really cool Real media file and if you want a copy (4.3 MB) just eMail me and I'll send it along...I'm going to check with Cubeman first to make sure it's OK.  It's the kind of content that would attract you to join her fan club anyhow.

Breast regards

Whinston  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on September 14, 2002, 12:55:35 PM
i dont see anything here interview related:
http://www.chelseacharms.com/newsfaq.html

is it on another page?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on September 14, 2002, 01:41:23 PM
We have no doubt that she came across as interesting and smart, because thats what she is. We mentioned in another thread how elegant Chelsea is, and what we meant by that was that despite whatever attention (positive or not) her figure may bring, she always remains sweet and composed without ever appearing trashy. There is an expresion that goes "You can't buy class"...and she is simply as classy a lady as we have ever met.
Wouldn't it be nice if there were more mainstream opportunities like this?

-D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on September 14, 2002, 03:06:37 PM
Hey JUGGSrnaut;

You won't find it in the general section, it's in the members section on the chapter page:
http://www.chelseacharms.com/members/chapter.html
or more specifically,
http://www.chelseacharms.com/members/videos/KSTE1a.rm

But you can't get in there without a password!  And when I think about it...

What a wonderful reason to join her site!  You get exclusive Photoclubs and Bosomquest previews, her own diary and log of events, exclusive photos and video clips that you won't find posted hither, thither and yon on yonder free sites.  And most of the members are smart enough not to post them on any of the sharing sites or on the gnutella network.

OH sure the occasional sample is posted, or even small group of photos from a series, but that seems to be just some eager fan wanting to entice the rest of you to join up at her fan site, members section.

And look at the photo sample I've attached here...now, you know you wa-a-a-n-n-t it!

Encourage the classy lady!

Whinston  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Character Zero on September 14, 2002, 08:52:52 PM
Could you post the audio file in a yahoo briefcase maybe?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on September 14, 2002, 09:03:32 PM
I've been a Chelsea fan since she was just a DD cup before her tremendous expansion. I always enjoyed her more in clothing than unclothed simply because of the visual eroticism it provides. Seeing her naked boobs with her veins doesnt do it for me anymore. She just looks to big for her frame. But seeing her in shirts, blouses, bras that look as if they are about to rip open are beyond belief. Lets face it, she has pretty eyes and hair but the boobs in clothing make me want to come back for more. I just with she would do more photos of her wearing normal clothing - because she looks so sexy in candid outfits.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Connoisseur on September 15, 2002, 03:57:00 AM
I couldn't agree with you more, Davastav.  I'd also add -- as stupid as this might sound -- that her naked breast just don't look like... well, breasts.  Gravity would have shaped real breasts of that size into a pleasant tear dropped shape. The larger her breasts become, the more noticeable their deviation from a natural shape, the less appealing they become to me.  

But she's absolutely unsurpassed in clothing.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on September 15, 2002, 12:53:35 PM
Pray tell, kind sir,
Can you supply the BEA brotherhood with a sample pic or two from the old days?

All the breast
Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SAMU on September 15, 2002, 10:03:55 PM
My Dad just recently got a PC and went online.  Knowing he is a boob man like me I right away got him up to speed regarding Chelsea. I told him about the "string" implants, how they grow with time et al, and how Chelsea has posted in some forums hat she considers herself as an experiment in BE, and that she has posted that she will let her boobs grow as big as they will get even if she has to hire two guys to roll them around in wheelbarrows as long as they don't cause medical problems. (He liked that idea) It just happened that as I was writing to my Dad regarding Chelsea some of you posted pics and threads regarding Chelsea's growth with before and after pics. Just wanted to let you know, and of course Chelsea herself, that this has been a fun topic for me to share with my Dad. Thanks.

SAMU    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrHHH on September 15, 2002, 10:47:41 PM
Ha! Father son bonding over CC. I just find that amusing.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on September 16, 2002, 04:57:51 AM
now to get mom and gramps and the rest of the family in on the fun!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: F_Cup_Fitzgerald on September 16, 2002, 06:34:39 AM
Oh, well, if you want to see the whole family "bonding together," so to speak, you should read some of Zorlond's stuff. He gets into that sort of thing. See Zorlond's Addventure Episode List for more details.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Prophet_Tenebrae on September 16, 2002, 12:32:37 PM
This reminds me of the Quake 2 adverts with children enjoying some wholesome Quake 2 pie with grandma.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 20, 2002, 08:02:05 PM
I like clothed Chelsea pics too. She does look sexy in normal clothes.

And yet.

There's something about seeing those veiny monsters all up in your face like that, something that makes me wanna....

I dunno. Color me besotted.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on September 21, 2002, 01:42:10 PM
I don't know about besotted, but I am definitely smitten with her!

In fact, see that little spinning boob on my avatar? That is her right one.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Janus on September 24, 2002, 04:32:09 AM
 Unfortuantely it's for private dances only. Like she'll show up at my dorm room. Well, if she does, I'll ask her to play video games or something, but on a college budget?

  Anyway, I though of the ultimate way to show up at my 5 year high school reunion. Have a big bust starlet and a drag queen as my dates. Anyone know any Big Bust entertainers who would like to mess with the admins of a prep school?

J- um 124....  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on September 24, 2002, 02:23:12 PM
haha, i was thinking of doing the same thing at my high school reuinion as well! well.. the big bust date part... not the drag queen.. what's the reason for that one?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Thedoctor on September 24, 2002, 03:02:42 PM
what she do in private? who has had her? how much?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Janus on September 24, 2002, 08:12:11 PM
Here's my thinking. I went to a PREP school. Let me repeat that...a WASHINGTON DC AREA JESUIT PREP SCHOOL. Now do you get the idea?

J- Known to friends and to enemies as "that magnificent fucking bastard."    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on September 30, 2002, 09:13:12 PM
Hey Gang;

Anyone here have a chance to take a good look at Chelsea Charms' material (pictures and video) from the CES2002?  All I can say is OMIGOD, she's gotta be the biggest she's ever been.  I mean, to me anyhow, you can really see some growth from last year.

I had read a lot of guys (and girls) saying that she had peaked and in some cases had had fluid removed and was a little bit smaller than at her peak.

But the evidence speaks for itself.  She's gigantic and what a wicked body.

Comments, submissions anyone?

Breast regards

Whinston  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on September 30, 2002, 09:17:16 PM
Hey man, where did you get the vid/clip? Thanks...
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 30, 2002, 09:19:38 PM
I only have one thing to say:

homina, homina, homina!

Would you look at THE SIZE OF HER CHEST!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Scarab on September 30, 2002, 09:20:49 PM
Diddo!  I would like to have that movie....Question is where can I find it to download for free?



-Scarab



   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RDaneel on September 30, 2002, 09:20:50 PM
It's from her site: chelseacharms.com

There are pictures that accompany the clip but they pale in comparison to the video (which is too small, imho).

RD  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 01, 2002, 12:36:31 AM
IN the interest of science, I'll post a few snaps from the video...but only in the interest of science and attracting new members to her pay site!!

Please, don't anyone tell Cubeman, or I'll be in trouble.  LOL

Breast regards

Whinston  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 01, 2002, 12:37:31 AM
Here's clipping 2  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 01, 2002, 12:37:52 AM
Here's clipping 3  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 01, 2002, 12:38:14 AM
Here's clipping 4  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on October 01, 2002, 02:56:19 AM
Thanks! Man she is getting bigger, I think -- awesome. I guess I better, re-up...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on October 01, 2002, 03:24:17 AM
wow, you can see her chest right through all of the people hording around her booth!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: skijumper on October 02, 2002, 03:13:49 AM
Oh.  My.  God.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on October 03, 2002, 12:21:34 AM
If you think she looks good on the vidcaps....you should have been there in person. This is a pic we posted in the members gallery....it is from the bikini contest on Fri afternoon.

-D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 03, 2002, 09:59:42 AM
Next year, Jane, Next year.  By hook or by crook I'm gonna make it to CES next year.  Thanks for the photo.  Got any hi-rez?

Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jat470 on October 03, 2002, 06:21:03 PM
How is everyone here able to download this clip? It keeps asking me for a  password.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 04, 2002, 09:47:19 PM
That's the whole point, jat, you need a password cause it's her pay site.

Us Chelsea lovers are trying to recruit you to join her site.  Maybe someone out there would be willing to send you a sample, but you should join and DL tons of great clips and pictures.

Cheers,
Whinston  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: soonersfan on October 05, 2002, 10:35:17 AM
By the way, how often is Chelsea's site updated?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 05, 2002, 05:54:42 PM
Well, not often enough for my liking.  Sometimes we can go close to a month without anything new.  Other times, you get what you pay for and we see new pix, video and a photoclubs preview update all in the same week.

Lately, it's been awesome.
Expensive, but not as bad as most places.  As long as she doesn't raise her rates again, I'll be sticking around for quite a while.  When Minka raised her rates from 8.95 to 24.95 a month, she lost my membership for good.  I know a lot of others who dropped out too.  I don't have all the data to do the math on it accurately, but I could estimate that 1000 members at 8.95 a month beats 100 at 24.95 a month anyday.

Supply-side economics and business models died in the 80s, and they're about the only part of the 80s I don't miss.  God, I miss big hair, tight asses and flat tummies on chicks.

But I digress.
Breast regards
Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: soonersfan on October 05, 2002, 06:54:06 PM
Thanks a lot for the info!  Well, I've never been a part of Minka's site, but that sounded like a pretty stupid thing to do, raising her membership fees by almost 300%!  Man, that brings back memories of economics class with supply versus demand, bell curves, and equilibrium.  I guess that she or her webmaster don't understand this.  Who knows, though?  She may be making more money right now, unless you're right about her membership numbers.  All I know is that I wish that I could find a girl with nice bell curves both in the front and back!  Yep, I just had to insert one cheesy comment in here!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RDaneel on October 06, 2002, 10:02:54 PM
Interesting comment, soonersfan.

I got spam from Danni Ashe's site reminding me that I was a member a long time ago and that I could rejoin for that price.

And I agree $10/mo for 1000 members vs $25/mo for five-hundred, sure sounds like the first yields greater profit.

RD  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Thedoctor on October 07, 2002, 02:02:20 AM
what the big deal? you all theives anyway. you got no permission to put her pics here. unemployed crooks got nothing better to do.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jithero on October 07, 2002, 02:44:32 AM
so when is this getting posted to the newsgroups anyway?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 07, 2002, 02:52:53 AM
Not all of us are thieves, and maybe there was permission.  I think you should re-read all of this and other threads on similar subjects.

I don't know about anyone else, but I like Za Doctor better than The Doctor, at least for manners and lack of flames.

Breast regards
Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: nick_caesar on October 07, 2002, 03:11:01 AM
Personally, I think "The Doctor" bespoils the good name of ZaDoctor, who makes regular contributions to the community, and whose work I thoroughly enjoy. Unlike this particular 'doctor', who contributes nothing but inflammatory remarks.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: NotElvis on October 07, 2002, 05:03:21 AM
Quoth whindinkler:
In reply to:


Supply-side economics and business models died in the 80s, and they're about the only part of the 80s I don't miss. God, I miss big hair, tight asses and flat tummies on chicks.




AMEN brother whindinkler, amen!!

Though given that I generally love really big boobs, I'd forgive if the ideal of the flat tummy and tight ass wasn't met!  

Oh, and to throw in as well, when rock music was energetic, flamboyant, and FUN . . . I really miss that.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: tndvrs on October 07, 2002, 07:39:02 AM
" You all theives anyway. you got no permission to put her pics here. unemployed crooks got nothing better to do. "

This means you are a rich guy? I hope you'll drouwn in your money. Thieves that steel to get rich is wrong, but to show and share some pictures is good, don't you want a test drive and know what you get for your money.
What to think of greed, I hate greedy people.
I hate selfish people (you sounds like one).

I have not all the right words to make it clear, but I don't like to be called a thief.
 
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: soonersfan on October 07, 2002, 12:10:44 PM
Hey, if you're going to accuse us of being THIEVES, at least have the brains to spell the word correctly!  I seriously doubt that you can come here and say that you've never downloaded one (or more) unpaid photos, videos, or mp3's.  And if you've ever downloaded or used pirated software or unpaid for shareware, then you're a thief, too.  You know what they say, "People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones."

Oh, and by the way, did it ever occur to you that Chelsea benefits from word of mouth advertising?  How can we spread the word about her if we don't share at least a few photos of her with our fellow breastmen?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 07, 2002, 04:55:58 PM
OH man, NotElvis;

Do I **EVER** miss real music!  Just say this out loud a few times "stupid stupid stupid stupid" there's the beat of every dance 'song' out there.

Music used to be FUN, happy enjoyable and lift you up and away from the mundane times and depressing challenges that exist in the rat-race.  A lot of it in the past while has just been a reminder of how shitty everything can be.  Who needs that?  Well, thank God the 90's are over at least.

But bring on the babes!  Bring on the women we worship.  Bring on the beautiful maidens like Chelsea and Sable and others.

Did you see that last pic of Sable in the jeans?  Oh.my.Gawwwwwdd. What a delicious ass. Sable, you'd make a dead man cum (to quote the stones).

All the breast!!

Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on October 12, 2002, 03:27:22 PM
.......  http://www.photoclubs.com/flash/amazing.shtml

NICE !!!!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 12, 2002, 04:38:27 PM
thats absolutely awsome!  thanks goclubsgo!!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 12, 2002, 05:28:27 PM
Is it just me, or has Chelsea's bosom undergone considerable growth lately, thus making it harder to fit fit her into pictures? Has anyone else noticed this?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 12, 2002, 06:59:49 PM
It is amazing what you can do with Macromedia Flash! Such a versatile multimedia/Internet file format!

Thanks for the link!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 12, 2002, 10:18:08 PM
It's safe to say that just like me, you have a knack for the obvious!  It's gotta be murder on her photographers when the only way to get a close-up is with a wide angle lens at 20'!
;-)

All the breast, bro
Whinston
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on October 12, 2002, 11:43:17 PM
It's harder too morph too, ya just get to the edge of the photo way too soon with her. Of course she really doesn't need morphing I guess. Usually after I morph her, I ask myself, "now why in the hell did you do that?" I guess it's just curiosity...
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 12, 2002, 11:57:56 PM
So it was a really cool view, did anyone save it as a stand-alone file or do we have to plead witht he gods of Photoclubs for it?

If you have it, drop it in me mailbox please!
All the breast

Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on October 13, 2002, 12:10:38 AM
I have the .swf file... I just tried it by dropping it on my browser. It works. I don't think you can attach files to personal messages in this forum.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 13, 2002, 12:18:37 AM
Or it could be that you're just giving yourself a preview of what she'll look like in another 6 months anyhow!!

Chelsea's life must be like one of Axolotl's stories about the FBGB.  She wakes up and they've grown again!  Every single day for the past 1495 days.

All the breast

Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on October 13, 2002, 04:26:27 AM
testing...whoo a whopping 1.01mb file. Better give you the link instead.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on October 13, 2002, 04:30:06 AM

Damn UBB. Is there anyway to turn off that option in my account?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 13, 2002, 06:20:36 AM
Please keep doing the Chelsea morphs Steveo.

The best thing is how CC keeps making the old morphs obsolete.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 13, 2002, 09:52:48 AM
Every time she brings out a new set of photos it takes my breath away.

I presume PhotoClub's pics are what you are thinking of. No matter how big her breasts get they can be captured in the frame.  Those quys are notorius for this mistake.  
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on October 13, 2002, 01:38:41 PM
Ok Catch. Here is a preview of one I am working on, she is going to fit in this one:



Damn, You got a boob reduction! Don't you know we are trying to ban that sort of thing?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrHHH on October 13, 2002, 02:08:44 PM
I think you guys should send her a group letter voicing this complaint.

"Dear Chelsa from the morphers of the BEA..."

I think she'll get a kick out of it.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tux on October 13, 2002, 03:46:32 PM
Hmm...link's now dead.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 13, 2002, 04:09:01 PM
Darn darn darn darn darn.

I really wanted to save that as a stand-alone file!
Anyone have it and care to post it to a yahoo group, or email it to my hotmail account?  I'll certainly return the favor.

Thanks
Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 13, 2002, 04:12:09 PM
Is that a morph?  It's so hard to tell these days.
;-)

Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on October 13, 2002, 06:27:40 PM
Yea it's a morph... about 30% more, but you are right it is getting hard to tell. Maybe I should make 'em bigger so there is no question... whatdy'all think?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on October 13, 2002, 08:30:40 PM
send your email address... I'll send it to you.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Quadhouse on October 13, 2002, 08:31:46 PM
It's back.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 14, 2002, 02:45:11 AM
I don't think there's enough room on my 15" LCD screen for you to fit anything more than 30% morphed tits and her head!

If you morph more than that, well I'll just have to go out and buy myself a new 23" Apple Cinema Display.  Considering I went shopping today, shouldn't take too much persuasion.

BTW, picked up a new printer...HP's large form CP1700.  recommended if you want to be able to print a page that contains both CC head and tits!  It can handle 13x18 paper and you'd need every bit of that. LOL

Whinston
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on October 14, 2002, 03:20:48 AM
actually its steve palmer your thinking about in the
Federal
Bureu of
Gigantic
Bosoms
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ApesMa on October 14, 2002, 04:08:35 AM
Make them bigger?  Yes, please...

"Please, sir, can I have some more?" --Oliver Twist  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 14, 2002, 04:58:22 AM
That's what I'm takling about Steveo.  Great morph!

The supersized Chelsea boobs are good for a laugh, but not as good as 30% bigger.  If she holds up CC might actually reach that size.  The supersized are an impossibility. Will there be a larger picture (that's picture not boobs) in your next update?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on October 14, 2002, 11:00:48 AM
Catch, I'll finish this one and include a full size pic in the next update...
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on October 14, 2002, 11:18:50 AM
whindinkler -- you better go get that monitor!



 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on October 14, 2002, 11:22:08 AM
ApesMa -- this is it! I am completely past the edge of pic... darn!  

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ApesMa on October 14, 2002, 11:30:38 AM
Thank you!  The extreme morphing I enjoy seems to go in and out of fashion, and right now we're in a dry spell. I am in your debt, sir!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 14, 2002, 04:46:07 PM
Galdamn it.  There goes the budget for another month!  Darn darn darn.  Well, the [censored] don't *really* need more clothes and junk anyhow.  LOL

Breast regards

Whinston P Dinkler
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: homevintner on October 15, 2002, 04:04:00 AM
But it's for a worthy cause.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on October 15, 2002, 08:20:36 AM
3 BEA artists do the extreme morphs. WebMuse, Wally, and Wooly Moose. Webmuse weave his into story/morphs, Wally's World many times does various sizes, and Wooly Moose has stills and gif's.  You haven't lived until you see Angliqueside.gif.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Scarab on November 13, 2002, 12:37:06 PM
OH...

MY...

...GOD!

She's getting sooo big

http://www.photoclubs.com/flash/carwash.shtml

enjoy



-Scarab



 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Blax12 on November 13, 2002, 01:42:53 PM
 
....... (I'm wordless)

Blax12

 
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hllywood_4_life on November 13, 2002, 03:03:05 PM
If some guy never really paid any attention to big breasts in his life and just saw that clip accidentally somewhere, he woulda went bonkers seeing that. Replaying it over, and over, and over again.

Thanks for puttin us on to that.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on November 13, 2002, 04:22:52 PM
And just think....


....She still a growing girl.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Googie on November 13, 2002, 04:29:14 PM
Holy macaroni! I mean... damn... whoa... I'm a little light-headed this instant from all the blood suddenly rushing below my waistline. Chelsea is a breasts amazon, and thank God we live in a world with her.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ATClown on November 13, 2002, 07:12:05 PM
Every so often, there comes along a graphic or picture or other piece of internet related material--not necessarily nudity related, either--that will draw me in so completely me that it's liable to get me into real trouble at work.

It's just a damn good thing that it's my day off, and I can stare until my heart's content.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HandyRefuse on November 13, 2002, 11:48:16 PM
if you want to you can dl the swf file Here and loop it all you want    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: kingdomcome on November 14, 2002, 12:36:39 AM
...wow. Don't be mad at me for this (I'm new), but you guys have to tell me about some other huge (and expanding) chicks like this one.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: D_U_S_K on November 14, 2002, 02:40:59 AM
How big is She going to go? I mean, I'd love to go as big as her, but does She even have a limit?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tux on November 14, 2002, 03:05:24 AM
Well she has string implants and they breasts keep filling with fluid until the string is seperated enough (at least that's my understanding).
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: D_U_S_K on November 14, 2002, 03:07:17 AM
String..?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tux on November 14, 2002, 03:09:43 AM
Surgical thread wound into a ball.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: D_U_S_K on November 14, 2002, 03:26:35 AM
Oh..Um..Ok..    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on November 14, 2002, 04:50:04 AM
I know it sounds a little weird but search the message board in General Discussion for mention of String Implants (perferably anything posted by Melonie Charms).

It takes a while to explain.  Though a few things about these implants:

A) They were experimental.

B) Because of they weren't liquid, they're a lot lighter than normal implants.

C) They're currently discontinued in the US.

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Brabuster67 on November 14, 2002, 04:56:25 AM
Chelsea should be appointed the next ruler of the world. She has more power than anyone and as for the tits too big is not big enough.
Cheers
BSB  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on November 14, 2002, 08:05:53 PM
Quick Question....has anyone seen pictures from the fanfair, or the bikini contest?...we are dying to see some if anyone can post. We saw a couple of pics on Hooters.dk of Colt45 and Chelsea sitting next to each other at the bikini contest...Jane was sitting right next to Chelsea, but was not in that photo...so...if there is any group that would know...it's you guys...we have faith in you.

Thanks-Dick  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Scarab on November 14, 2002, 09:56:35 PM
I agree with Dick, I wish to see some pics from the fanfair, as well.
 
I'm also wondering if the romurs are true about her getting fluid taken out, And if it IS true I thought that she was going to go as big as she could without causing health problems(maybe I was dreamin)



-Scarab



   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: D_U_S_K on November 14, 2002, 10:11:12 PM
Hmmm, Actually, She's gotta a pretty safe spot for her industry. I hear those string implants of her's are discontinued in the US and any competition would need many bills. Aaaaaactually...I can get tickets relatively cheap to get out of the country...and the money isnt too much of a problem.

Yes.. *Rubs hands together* Chelsea, You shall come to face Titania! Er..Mammoria? Breastanny? Jesstita? Damn..It's harder than it seems.  

Anyway, She looks like a strong person overall. I'd hope to meet her in person one day.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ekim on November 14, 2002, 11:01:01 PM
Does she have a DVD or tape that can be purchased?
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Scarab on November 15, 2002, 05:57:18 AM
If you have a DivX Player go to www.BosomQuest.Com , I think she has four or five online videos...

If you want VHS of her go to www.chelseacharms.com , I think she has 3 videos there.... enjoy



-Scarab



 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: maybeenuf4u on November 16, 2002, 10:08:30 PM
Thanks Sdurfy! I knew  could count on someone getting the whole file and making it d/l able.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Scarab on November 27, 2002, 10:17:32 AM
enjoy

http://www.photoclubs.com/vip151.shtml



-Scarab



 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on November 27, 2002, 11:56:05 AM
That's all fine, but has any one seen any NEW pix of Chelsea?  Man, they're as scarce as hen's teeth!

There are like 4 to 8 news pictures on her site about every 6 weeks...not exactly a great incentive to sign up at $14.95 a month!

Dub-YA
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on November 28, 2002, 02:56:04 AM
Have you noticed how rare it is to see pictures of chelsea fully nude. There would only be a handful on her site all up, and in video's near on non existent.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Vermillion on November 28, 2002, 03:52:19 AM
Actually i prefer seeing all the busty ladies clothed or lingerie rather than full nudity. More of a turn-on actually.  

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on November 28, 2002, 04:01:40 AM
I agree.  I like to let my imagination do the work.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: D_U_S_K on November 28, 2002, 05:50:41 AM
Nudes are good once in awhile, but you cant do too much with them, Creativity comes with clothing choice.

I do like seeing nudes where Her back is to you and you see the swell of the side of her bosoms. That or a well placed hand.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Varchild on November 29, 2002, 04:01:33 AM
That and there are alot of people out there who think she has an ugly vagina.

but that's just my theory.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on November 29, 2002, 07:35:25 AM
Chelsea set's are in vogue @ Hooters.dk on the user gallery right now.  About every 3rd set that are posted have at least a few new pics.  This isn't any help now, but 10 new pics were posted yesterday. Sorry, they're gone now.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on November 29, 2002, 09:56:36 AM
I'm not a Chelsea fan per se, but I don't think I'd refer to her genitals as 'ugly'... like women, vaginas come in all shapes and sizes, and Chelsea's does have a larger, looser appearance externally (though in my experience, there's no relationship between the external appearance and the actual tightness inside) which I suppose some might not consider her best feature.

I happen to enjoy full nude shots of models as well as clothed and partially clothed... I'd venture a guess that given Chelsea's enhancements, most photographers focus on them (the two huge implants) in most shoots, rather than going for some kind of artistic (or pseudo-artistic) full nude shoot like Sarenna Lee does now and again.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on November 30, 2002, 02:19:52 AM
Old Chelsea's pic.

see yaa...  =)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on December 31, 2002, 04:54:20 PM
The one that costs 45 bazookas? I'm trying to make Christmas come a little early this year. How would you rate it next to Changing Chelsea?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on January 01, 2003, 07:48:01 PM
I'm not so sure that Chelsea can improve on her Changing Chelsea Video, unless she remade it, using her current size. Actually, her new video is fun and seeing her in a public setting is pretty neat. I figure anything of Chelsea is pretty much dreamland for me. I enjoyed it.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on January 04, 2003, 07:47:50 AM
hey everyone! wow, i haven't posted in a long time!
i'm still back home (on dialup) so i won't be able to post much until i get back to my place... and then i'd have hundreds of new posts to catch up on...


anyway, just got an email from Chelsea Charms and she will be in San Francisco on Feb. 5 and 6 for PRIVATE SHOWS!

it is pretty expensive, and i'm starting to save now and hope i can afford it...
it's $400 for half hour and $750 for a full hour...

if any of you are also in the area and can afford the private show, this is your chance to get a full contact lap dance from Chelsea!

anyway... i'm getting my begging cup ready and hopping out into the streets..
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on January 04, 2003, 08:21:28 AM
$750 a hour ?????  Damn .. plumbers don't even make that much ...

I need a job like that ...

-Munch "Or a sugar momma" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on January 04, 2003, 08:50:34 AM
does ANYBODY make that much?

anyway... donations are always GLADLY accepted
and i'll be sure to send you photos of course
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rev_Monsoon on January 04, 2003, 09:24:23 AM
I still need to harrass the local clubs to book her so I can even see her on stage.
Heck!  This is Houston Texas!  Where we like things big!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: D_U_S_K on January 04, 2003, 06:39:49 PM
Just like Your Cholesterol and Guts.

Sorry, I had to hit on the 'Houston called Fattest City' thing.

It's pretty amazing the lengths men will go for breasts like those. I would say it's a bit high, but then She is the BIGGEST, or atleast the biggest who will take off her top for you.

I's got a quarter, three nickels and a pennny, What will that get me?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rafe on January 04, 2003, 07:08:02 PM
Houston's fatter than New Orleans?  

I'm terrified.  The sheer number of 300+ pound folks here is astonishing, and the number of those pushing hard towards 500 just boggles the mind.

What's it get you?  Forty-one cents.  Maybe a small fry or small coffee, and enough left over for some gumballs.

Or, coupled with a strategic cleavage deployment, free drinks all night at the bar of your choice.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rev_Monsoon on January 04, 2003, 10:59:07 PM
Maybe it's the amount of fat people that's clogging up the freeways here.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on January 05, 2003, 03:27:55 AM
"I's got a quarter, 3 nickels, and 3 pennies. What will that get me?"

Maybe a lap dance from Munch Wolf?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on January 05, 2003, 06:10:33 AM
shhh Catch ... that's your private price ... not supposed to be telling everyone ...

-Munch "call me scrumptious" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on January 05, 2003, 07:20:02 AM
My mistake.

You said you wanted to make $750/hour. Thought this was a way to start out and work your way up.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on January 06, 2003, 03:41:05 PM
actually Dr. Monsoon, she's only coming for private shows, so the ONLY way to see her is to spend at least $400 for the half hour show... she won't be making any appearances at any clubs... and who can blame her? it would be almost impossible to walk around in public and not have anyone oogling or worse yet trying to do something to her.

and Jessica, you're always welcomed to SF if you're ever bored... i'd much rather meet a real girl and go out to dinner

now that i think about it, 400 smackers is A LOT! if i even do save up that much, all of it would go to school since spring semester is starting up...


anyway... no one else is up for the private show with Chelsea huh?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 06, 2003, 06:54:41 PM
If she does virtual shows over the Internet, for virtual cash (i.e. for free), then yeah, I can swing on by. If not, well, let's just say that SF's a leetle bit far from here, especially if I have to go by banana boat...

*sigh*  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Chili_Palmer on January 07, 2003, 04:47:16 AM
When she comes to LA in April, we'll be getting together.

CP
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: D_U_S_K on January 07, 2003, 05:35:58 AM
Chilipalmer is like the kid with all the Pokemons cards at Recess right now...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on January 07, 2003, 05:50:21 AM
wow ... I feel old now ...

-Munch "What's pokemon?  What's recess?" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rev_Monsoon on January 07, 2003, 06:34:30 AM
Pokemon and Yu Gi Oh is Crack for kids!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on January 07, 2003, 07:09:20 AM
yeah, those damned cards certainly are! wish i could cash in so easily on these fads... then i could meet Chelsea...

i wonder if she would let multiple people chip in for the private show and we could all meet her... that sure would help with the costs, and you could go with your friends too!

gah.. who am i kidding... guess i'll have to wait till the next time she comes to town, whenever that is...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on January 10, 2003, 01:27:06 AM
there's really no one interested in seeing Chelsea?

or just don't have the money...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on January 10, 2003, 03:07:09 AM
how about C) we're not near San Francisco

-Munch "The closest I get is my Rice-a-roni" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on January 10, 2003, 03:11:41 AM
well, i meant to the pretty numerous amount of people around here...
and Chelsea is visiting other major cities too... check out her site, so would any of you go for the private show if she came to your area?

and what does Rice-a-roni have to do with San Francisco?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on January 10, 2003, 03:21:36 AM
It's the San Francisco treat ...

Anyway ... 400 HUNDRED dollars for a ... well .. however long it was ... just so someone could dance in front of me?

Damn .. that's more than I make in a ... oh yeah .. I don't have a job right now ... Damn .. that's alot ...

Shoot .. if I wanted to spend a whole lot of money just for sexual relief I'ld get married ..

-Munch "Come to think of it ... I never did get much sex when I was married" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on January 11, 2003, 08:34:07 AM
oh yeah? you're a bum too? hehe...

but at least you're not in school too...

anyway... remember i'm just a virgin college boy
never got to see a real life girl before
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Fraction on January 27, 2003, 06:45:45 PM
I was thinking of signing up for Chelsea Charms Photoclubs site when I noticed that her site costs $10 more than anyone else at Photoclubs. I can see that Photoclubs is just taking advantage of what must be their biggest draw and I can't blame them for that. Then I got to wondering if any of that extra cash goes back to Chelsea, or do you think she's able to ask more for her photo shots.

Does Chelsea, Maxi, Minka, or any other big boob entertainer really rake in the cash every year or make enough to comfortably get by.  What do you think they make a year? $100,000+? $200,000+?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 18, 2003, 04:08:18 PM
boston fans of ms. charms,

chelsea charms will be in the boston area in the middle of next month.  she will be appearing at MARIO'S SHOWPLACE II in webster, during march 13-15.

after hearing all the good things ppl here have said about her (dickandjane, goclubsgo, etc) i can assure you ill be there.  it will be my first time seeing her and im already excited!

you can see ms. charm's schedule here: http://www.chelseacharms.com/chasing.html  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: pgolden on February 18, 2003, 05:12:45 PM
Hey JUGGSrnaut, its gonna be a good show, see you there. Saw that you said it'll be your first time seeing Chelsea, MAKE SURE YOU GET A FRONT ROW SEAT!!! you won't want to miss her special performances to those in the front row. C'ya  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on February 18, 2003, 07:05:27 PM
She sure does travel around alot

-Munch "I thought I got around" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on February 18, 2003, 07:15:36 PM
Excellent!

I'm trying to free up my schedule to be there too!  Hopefully we can all (or some of us) hook up!

Cheers and Breast regards

W
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on February 19, 2003, 12:22:24 AM
You won't be sorry. She is as sweet as she is beautiful, and she is actually more beautiful in person. (alot of people are the opposite). Tell her we say hi, although she knows us by our "other names", we think she knows who Dick and Jane are.

Boston is one of our favorite towns, although we hate the Celtics, Bruins, Red Sox and Pats. (we don't really hate the Bruins). We doubt it is possible...but Chelsea is worth making the road trip for.

Peace, Love and Light- D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 19, 2003, 01:47:40 AM
im likewise with nyc, i just love the place; have been contemplating a move to manhattan/brooklyn/queens for some time now.  maybe when this economy turns around.  i checked out flashdancers last year in times sq. and it was quite nice.  wasnt lucky enough to catch a big bust feature, however i remember one of the house dancers there was quite nice.  seems its just a more fun place to be.

as for sports teams, the feeling is mutual.  everyone knows that george and co. are the evil empire of the sport and that this is "the year" for the red sox.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on February 19, 2003, 04:53:44 AM
i missed her when she came to SF...

but hope you have fun. and i know you will  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Blax12 on February 19, 2003, 11:04:38 AM
 
Maybe I could buy an intercontinental ticket, come to Boston (a city I liked when I've been there in 1997) and see her...or I could wait her to come in Ferrara...I don't know, I have got to check her schedule...

  Europe...what am I living here for?

Blax12
 
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on February 20, 2003, 02:37:49 AM
heres a link to mario's showplace ii general info: http://www.mariosshowplace.com/

map as well:
http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?address=197%20Thompson%20Rd%20&city=Webster&state=MA&country=USA

hope these help.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on February 20, 2003, 08:07:09 AM
well.. Europe has those NATURALLY HUGE breased women!

how many naturals do we have here? the few who are naturally well endowed, unfortunately get reductions...
just thank God for implants though.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RDaneel on February 21, 2003, 09:31:07 PM
I picked a bad time to move from Beantown to Florida!
 
RD  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 15, 2003, 12:18:45 AM
ok....let me take some deep breaths.  i feel like i just went on a couple weeks of vacation.

so i just got back from seeing chelsea charms perform, and let me say it was the most awesome experience i have had in a long time.

first off, performance-wise, she is a natural.  beaming smile, great demeanor, great costume (she performed her "sailor" show).  its amazing the way she can move being as immensely busty as she is.  between going around and giving all interested parties a head and face massage (mine was definitely the longest, or at least it seemed that way.  it felt like an enternity, and i say that wishing it lasted longer ), and putting a mug between her bosoms and having  fans shoot crumpled up bills for photos, it was absolutely great.  i nailed it on my first shot, and scored a nice photo of her.  boy, does she take care of her fans.  i encourage all of you who plan on seeing her to go hoop it up a little and practice.

her boobs aside, as d&j have continually mentioned, chelsea is an absolute joy to talk to.  she is one of the *nicest* people i have ever met.  after telling her im a *huge* fan of hers and that d&j sent me (thanks you two!), i requested a polaroid.  i opted for sitting down (now i wish i did it standing, oh well, im like a little kid, always next time).  she is so accomadating and knew exactly what i wanted (read: she grabbed my hands and put them right on her bosoms! )  she had other photos and videos for sale as well.

after telling her how big of a fan i was again, i invited her to come check out the BEA.  i told her there are many people here that are great fans of hers and always saying nice things about her.

all in all, i cannot reccommend to you enough....  let me rephrase that, i ORDER you to go check out chelsea;  you will NOT be dissapointed.  like i said at the beginning of this post, i feel like i just went on a couple weeks of vacation after seeing her.  that aside, shes just an absolute joy to talk with.  this is the first time im rating any performer here at the BEA, take it as you will, i give ms. charms five stars        .

again, many thanks to d&j!

ps- i would appreciate it if you all could please rate me as a user.  just curious, id really like to see if my participation here is appreciated.  thanks!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on March 15, 2003, 02:59:57 AM
[/rant]Though I would love to see Chelsea Charms perform there seems to a very noticable lack of BB entertainers here in western New York.

Why couldn't I have raised in NYC? WHY?[/endrant]  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ATClown on March 15, 2003, 03:24:48 AM
Dude, when she gets to Nashville, I am so there.  Lordy, Lordy, Lordy.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Janus on March 15, 2003, 03:42:51 AM
Models never come to D.C. it's an unwritten rule. When Chelsea did come here it was for private dances...during the whole sniper fiasco. I can just see it now:

"Mom, Dad, can I have 500 dollars early for my birthday. I'm going to risk getting shot so I can get a stripper to dance for me in a hotel downtown."

*click* *dullllllll*

"Hello? Hello?"

J- Metriod prime...mmmmm funky.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrEff on March 15, 2003, 06:27:04 AM
Gotta love it eh Juggs?  I'm heade back there tomorrow night (Sat) for another round!!  Can't wait once again!!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rafe on March 15, 2003, 06:34:51 AM
Carl-  Two words:  Canadian Ballet.  I remember living in Buffalo, and the magic words were, "Fort Erie - Tiffany Towers - House Dancer."  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 15, 2003, 03:13:53 PM
mreff,
i would too, but 65mi from boston to webster takes up a lot of time, driving that is (2.5hr on the road going and returning).  and fate has it i have a bunch of stuff to take care of today.  however, next time she is in the boston area, i will be there for at least 2 shows!

i know mreff knows, but chelsea's last shows are tonight, at 5, 8, 10 and 12 i believe.  call them to confirm.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 15, 2003, 07:37:54 PM
here are some dates to mark on your calendar:
April 24 - 26
ANTHONY'S SHOWPLACE
Nashville, Tennessee  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on March 16, 2003, 12:20:23 AM
Rafe: Does tiffany still dance? She one of my favorite performers...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rafe on March 16, 2003, 12:48:01 AM
I couldn't say - Haven't lived up there for a few years, and don't get back much.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 16, 2003, 03:42:09 AM
i thought she was a house dancer in windsor, ontario, no?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Singulari on March 16, 2003, 03:58:26 AM
Dudes She must read this forum.
She has dates in Nashville, Ontario, even Des Moines Iowa.
Now if she would only come to New Orleans (Hint, Hint)
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kidney on March 16, 2003, 06:14:40 AM
Yaaay!  Chelsea's going to be in town and right before my birthday too!  What a present!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on March 16, 2003, 09:39:13 AM
Welcome Singulari ... greetingss and salutations ...


-Munch "Hi Chelsea if you're reading this ... and um ... I guess not-hi if you're not" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on March 16, 2003, 01:30:35 PM
 
In reply to:

 Dudes She must read this forum.
She has dates in Nashville, Ontario, even Des Moines Iowa.
...




Iowa? Where the hell is Iowa? Is that over by Ohio?
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kidney on March 16, 2003, 07:43:00 PM
Hopefully, it (Iowa) is right outside.  Otherwise, I guess I'm lost... hehe.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jayjay88 on March 16, 2003, 07:56:14 PM
Thanks for sharing!...i can imagine how the experience must be absolutely mind blowing.  I've read many accounts of the Chelsea shows and the impression is always the same...not only unbelievable boobs, but even more beautiful in person, and really nice and friendly to boot...a winning combination!

Well, the experience remains a fantasy for me...i've often thought: 'You could just get on a plane and spend 2 or 3 days of nothing but Chelsea shows...'  but then reason kicks in and i come to my senses.

Well, maybe one day i'll get senseless...thanks again!

Here's one of my fantasies of Chelsea...and to remind you.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on March 16, 2003, 10:35:25 PM
Juggernaut our Brother,

Thanks you for the positive press, but truthfully we deserve no credit here. We doubt that we were able to influence anyone that wasn't already going to see Chelsea anyway. And you would have just had to find out how terrific she is for yourself, which we are sure would have happened regardless

If you want, check out the Fan Foto portion of Chelsea's site ( http://www.chelseacharms.com/fanfotospage.html ) There are a couple of pics with Jane in them at the Fan Fair in Vegas. It might give you a chuckle.

This is going to be a crazy week for us...and we don't know if we are going to be able to get back on for a while...so be sure to let us know how great a time you had when you go to see Crystal

Peace, Love and Light -D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on March 17, 2003, 12:46:13 AM
submit your own chelsea pics??? Hmmmm ./.. should we warn her about the one I did ????

-Munch "Although technically I think anyone should be seriously warned before seeing the one I did" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Character Zero on March 31, 2003, 08:14:58 PM
Chelsea is so big and still growing I think!  Does anyone know how she functions in day to day life?  I mean do those things hurt her back?  I really think her boobs are sexy and on a completely selfish level I want them to keep getting bigger... But sometimes the reality of the situation just starts boggling my mind.  I mean what do other people think when they see her?  Is it possible to hide boobs that big under baggy clothes?  Or do you think she just doesn't care what others think?  I guess I'm just curious what everyone else thinks about these things.  I know I like hearing what others have to say.  These models' websites never get into the day-to-day stuff behind having boobs so big, and they certainly rarely get into the psychology behind wanting such big breasts.  What are your thoughts?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Glottis on March 31, 2003, 10:19:18 PM
its impossible to hide those, obviously, unless you trick people into thinking that you weigh 700 pounds.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 31, 2003, 11:38:22 PM
from what i saw when i went to see her perform live is that she carries them extremely well, especially for just how big her breasts are.  as stated, as i am is sure with all dancers of the proportions of chelsea, minka, maxi, kayla, etc is that depending on the baginess of the clothes worn, the breasts may or may not be readily noticeable.

as for day to day living, i would venture to guess that everything from dressing to **83** to driving to walking down the street are different from their smaller busted counterparts.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Character Zero on April 01, 2003, 02:20:28 AM
Yeah, everything must be complicated by her breasts.  Here's a fairly candid (or at least seemingly unposed) pic I found of her writing something at a desk.  I mean, simply reading and writing must become difficult for any long period of time...  Maybe it's wierd, but is the immobility aspect of large breasts a turn on for anyone?  This is the place to discuss fetishes, ya know...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on April 02, 2003, 01:49:00 AM
Well that is a suprise.

I didn't know Chelsea wears glasses, I have to admit that it's an attractive new side of Ms. Charms. It makes her that much less distant and gives me hope that I have a chance (yeah right...)

Does anyone know if she has ever done a photoshoot while wearing the glasses?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on April 02, 2003, 02:06:03 AM
i know both mega-titters minka and maxi mounds have appeared in pictures in which they are wearing glasses.  i think our beloved sable holiday has as well.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on April 02, 2003, 02:19:11 AM
Its conclusive then. Having large breasts means you'll need glasses....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ATClown on April 02, 2003, 02:33:54 AM
Sheber:  Is the converse true?  

I wear glasses.  Does that mean I'll one day have large breasts?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on April 02, 2003, 02:37:17 AM
If you keep posting, your cup size will surely increase....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gOOber on April 02, 2003, 02:41:08 AM
  Glasses = Large Breasts  

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on April 02, 2003, 02:51:28 AM
Not to burst your bubbles but I believe that it WAS posed...as uncomfortable as it may be it have your chest in your lap, propping them up on a desk is 10 times worse. That and-aside from fantasys, how often do the women you know just sit and write while topless (with hidden cameras hovering over them)?

Its nice to pretend though
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on April 02, 2003, 02:51:02 AM
That's it, I'm getting my gf a pair of glasses.  She doesn't need them, but I sure do!(If ya catch my drift)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Character Zero on April 02, 2003, 03:53:35 AM
Well, yeah there is a good chance it was posed, but she still looks more candid than in most pictures of her...

As for proping your breasts on a table to write: well, when I was in high school there was a girl with big breasts who used to have to prop them on the desk during class.  This was because the desk was attached to the chair and she couldn't push back from the desk far enough.  I remember one day I was eavesdropping on her conversation with some of her friends and she was complaining about it.  She was pretty cute too, she was curvy, but not overwieght by any means.  Most of the weight was in the chest.  And she wore some snug cloths.  It was pretty hot, actually...

As for big breasts equalling glasses... maybe it's from eyestrain from having to hold the book too far away from your face.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveZ on April 02, 2003, 04:31:05 AM
For the record:

I'm a BIG fan of ANY woman in glasses...i think the right glasses on the right woman is REALLY sexy...

and

the immobility factor of large breasts is a BIG turnon.  When my g/f has to move her breasts out of the way for some reason, or when she sits there struggling to close her shirt i'm like "wow."  I imagine that seeing someone like Chelsea Charms struggling to be mobile in some situation would be a real treat.

Steve Z
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Brabuster67 on April 02, 2003, 05:13:05 AM
Here are a couple of pics of chelsea dressed in the baggy every day look.  If this chic walked down the street towards you would you notice? I for one would get a raging stiffy and then ned to go yo my room for relief.  She is so hot when clothed - not sure what it is just that je'ne sais quo I guess.
Cheers
BSB  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Brabuster67 on April 02, 2003, 05:13:49 AM
Just in case you like and wnat more.  Here you go.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on April 02, 2003, 06:47:38 AM
Any chance that you can share a good quality copy of Chealsea in profile at the lakeshore? It is such a lovely picture...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: St Stephan on April 02, 2003, 10:44:07 AM
Sounds like you guys are ripe for...[drumroll]...
the Fifth Annual Spectacle of Spectacles.


sheber, you mean this series (see attached)?  I'll be happy to upload a few for you.  You prefer clothed, topless?  There's even one very rare and lovely totally nude.  Want 'em?

0 ( ( o ! < J
sheber, please shove your tongue back in your mouth and articulate.          
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DruulEmpire on April 02, 2003, 01:04:45 PM
Saint: thank you.

SteveZ: I will second any vote you care to cast for a morph of Thalia Assuras ...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: St Stephan on April 02, 2003, 02:27:58 PM
In reply to:

 Saint: thank you.




Sure.  

0 ( ( o ! < J
uhhhh...what for?

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on April 02, 2003, 05:28:44 PM
...in her sweatshirt...


(Thanks StS, I love the spectacle of Spectacles Game)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: St Stephan on April 02, 2003, 06:25:13 PM
 
In reply to:

...in her sweatshirt...
 (Thanks StS, I love the spectacle of Spectacles Game)


I should have the Sp. of Sp. ready by tomorrow.  Not much of a game this time, I've got so much good stuff that I've made only one with fake glasses.  Okay, it'll just be all the harder to find.

I don't have any of Chelsea in a sweatshirt by a lake.  You don't mean the attached, do you (maybe there's a lake nearby)?  If you can post a sample maybe I'll know which series you mean.  I have an awful lot of Chelsea.  In the meantime I'll post that rare one of her stark naked, I really like it and I have to make an info post anyway.

0 ( ( o ! < J
Let me know quick if you want a few more of the lake series, since my quota will be shot for the next week
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on April 02, 2003, 08:12:15 PM
 http://forum.bearchive.com/files/74556-top001.jpg  

Thank you goes to Brabuster67 for posting it, but there are so many compression artifacts that it looks like it was once saved as an *.art file...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Chili_Palmer on April 03, 2003, 05:42:32 AM
Actually, it's  a lot more fun being immobilized  by Chelsea, having her straddle your waist while your head and shoulders are buried between those babies. I swear to God, those things account for half her body weight.

CP
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tugboatcap on April 04, 2003, 02:34:06 AM
Ok Chili, now you must tell the "Rest of the story"!  Inquiring minds want to KNOW!!! (I take it your visit went well?)

Tugboatcap!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on April 04, 2003, 02:54:05 AM
if she wanted to, she could definitely knock you over, or at least rattle your nerves (in a good way ), with her bosom.  like chili says, her breasts are of considerable weight now, probably in the 10-15 pound range each id vemture to guess.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: airamh2 on April 04, 2003, 04:25:17 AM
Had a recent "private dance" with CC. Even though I had seen her in person several times in the past, each new encounter is awe-inspiring. The sheer size of the breasts is beyond description. When sitting down, they protrude forward and laterally to such an extent that you can't believe they are part of her body. My favorite viewing position is being somewhat down low, with her standing, thrusting them toward me, then moving away and handling her boobs, lifting them and jiggling them. Each breast is so huge that my two cupped hands together cover a tiny fraction of their surface area.
Just as important, the woman is sweet, intelligent, tattoo free, and smells great. Certainly no one comes close to her as the ultimate big breast fetishist fantasy.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: airamh2 on April 04, 2003, 04:27:37 AM
BTW, Juggernaut, she says that each one weighs 26 pounds. She has intermittent drainage of fluid, but says she is at her maximum size now because of an upcoming photo shoot.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on April 04, 2003, 04:52:29 AM
thanks for the info airamh.  wow, had to believe her breasts account for approximately 1/3 of her total weight.  amazing.  did she happen to say which magazine the photoshoot was for?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Chili_Palmer on April 04, 2003, 05:27:48 AM
Some notes on CC's ccs:

She's such a tiny, petite girl that it's pretty remarkable she can stand at all, let alone move like she does. On her back is a noticeable red scar, right where her bra takes the weight off her. Oh, how artists must suffer for their craft.

I've been with a number of the biggest busted ladies around, and Chelsea puts them all to shame, volume-wise. As I tried to heft her chest (I pegged them at 20-25 pounds apiece), I noticed that even with my hands fully outstretched, it would take at least six hands to completely circumnavigate those globes. Think about that for a moment.

Hers are much heavier than Minka's, and she seemed to enjoy the more **76** breastplay as things progressed during our time together. One doesn't fully appreciate the concept of a "shelf" of boobs until one is fully underneath them and looking up, unable to see anything past their silhouette. I still shake my head in wonderment.

Chili (who's next? Ashley Evans or Lisa Lipps again?) Palmer

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DTM on April 04, 2003, 11:26:48 AM
I don't want to put a damper on this party. But I am told she has trouble breathing....
This info came to me from another big boober. It's amazing how much they know and keep track of each other. Especially when you sit and actually talk with them for hours.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on April 07, 2003, 07:23:52 PM
i know that this topic has been posted about before, but considering the cache of pics i came across at www.hooters.dk today, it deserves to be brought up again.  i, along with most of you im sure, am still mind-boggled at the amount of which chelsea's breasts have grown since busted onto the scene in 2000.  i remember thinking she was huge then (she was about the size of crystal storm, the biggest on the scene then).  now her bosom then pales in comparison to the one she sports today.  heres a pic that illustrates this:
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: thcbl on April 07, 2003, 09:04:24 PM
Is that really her now? Like - not morphed? Holy shit those are huge.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Entropy on April 07, 2003, 09:31:45 PM
Amazing how much the human skin can stretch...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Glottis on April 07, 2003, 10:05:35 PM
not to be rude, but the pic on the right really looks like a morph. look at the bottom edge of her left boob, it looks like someone did some lame photoshopping.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 07, 2003, 10:18:19 PM
Sorry to disappoint you.  But it's not a morph.  The pic is just badly compressed.

Here's the pic by itself.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 07, 2003, 10:21:41 PM
And for those who still don't believe(or need to see to believe)  I give you another NON-MORPH!  

Mod edit to remove Photoclubs image... no violation logged due to age of post. -Palomine
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 07, 2003, 10:24:04 PM
And for those who were asking for Chelsea's walk in the woods....HADOKEN!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 07, 2003, 10:25:57 PM
And one more for those who need more....SHORYUKEN!!!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on April 08, 2003, 12:22:19 AM
Thanks! Do you happen to have the one (in the same outfit) of her crouching down at the lakeside?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 08, 2003, 12:42:03 AM
BOO-YAKA!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on April 08, 2003, 01:22:40 AM
Thanks, Strider, for bring da shizzle.



(shinobi)
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DruulEmpire on April 08, 2003, 01:29:41 AM
Niiiiice drehhhhhss, Chelsea ... niiiiice drehhhhhss ...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on April 08, 2003, 03:26:54 AM
Uh...shi...no...fu...no, that's not it either....ummm....DAMN she's huge!  Yeah that's it.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 08, 2003, 04:01:55 AM
Anytime, bro.  Anytime.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 08, 2003, 04:38:13 AM
 
In reply to:

I don't want to put a damper on this party. But I am told she has trouble breathing....
 




That's only if she sleeps on her back because that 56 pounds of breasts pushing on her chest and lungs.  I'd imagine standing and sitting is fine because no pressure is being applied.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 08, 2003, 04:39:24 AM
The shoot is for photoclubs.  She's doing it this weekend.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: pgolden on April 08, 2003, 02:47:43 PM
Hey guys and gals, yeah, believe it or not, the picture that Juggernaut posted is NOT a morph, nor are any other comparison pictures of Chelsea, she really has grown that much. I have been a huge fan of Chelsea's ever since she came onto the scene in 1999, and I have definitely noticed a huge(but slow) growth in her breast volume. According to Chelsea herself, when she first got her implants, they were the equivilent of 2500cc's, but now she says the doctors are estimating her at over 7500cc's, and those were the numbers she gave on her website probably six months ago. So it is true, she really has done some growing up. Cya  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Psf_79 on April 08, 2003, 03:41:00 PM
And please note that the pic in Juggernaut's comparison is from 2001..!! Anybody got a recent shot?

In another Chelsea thread it was said that Chelsea has some fluid taken out of her breasts every now and then. I remember having read this is the case with other models with 'sillystring' implants, like Minka and Maxi.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: thcbl on April 08, 2003, 04:34:45 PM
 56 pounds??? Wow. That's all I have to say to that ... just ... wow. Talk about back muscles that Ah-Nold would be jealous of.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 08, 2003, 04:49:09 PM
My bad, I added wrong.  It's 52 pounds.  But still even 4 pounds off, that's still alot.  

I can only imagine how many times she's lost her balance.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on April 08, 2003, 05:17:54 PM
Alas, it is true.  She does get fluid drained out of her immense breasts every now and then.

Imagine how BIG she'd be if she didn't?  

WOW

W  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on April 08, 2003, 06:14:07 PM
My only question is will she ever say she's big enough?  God I hope not!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 08, 2003, 06:38:33 PM
She said in one of her newsletters "My doctor informed me that they’re still growing. I don’t know how much more I can take! They’re already the biggest; what more is there to prove? "

Personally.  I think 52 pound boobs is quite enough.  She looks good at her current(and maximum) size.  Any bigger than what she can take is too much for me.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on April 08, 2003, 06:41:27 PM
 
In reply to:

 Alas, it is true. She does get fluid drained out of her immense breasts every now and then.

Imagine how BIG she'd be if she didn't?
 




She mentioned she at her maximum at the current moment for her Photoclub shoot this weekend.  Plus one of the attachments I left in this thread has her at her maximum.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ApesMa on April 08, 2003, 08:59:01 PM
"Personally. I think 52 pound boobs is quite enough."

Hmmm. Is that collectively, or each?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: debra872 on April 08, 2003, 09:15:38 PM
Total.  Another thread here quoted her as saying they were 26 lbs each.

Or to look at it another way, at least 1/3 of her body weight (as someone mentioned).  Yikes!
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BacE on April 08, 2003, 09:30:19 PM
yeay, number cruching, that would mean that she has the equivalant of 9850cc implants and that would make them 10,5" wide each (sheesh that's almost as broad as i am)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on April 08, 2003, 10:32:07 PM
Okay for those of you who may think Chelsea is morphed..not! Here is a pic from last year's adult expo in Vegas. Chelsea, me and a couple of our favs; Colt45 and Kayla Kupcakes.

We met Chelsea for the first time pre-string implants. She was smaller than the before pic that Jugger is showing us. The string continues to expand because it is not contained. It is not like a regular implant that is in a pouch. The string fills your breast cavity and continues to expand. I did my homework.

Chelsea is one of the coolest, sweetest, down to earth, not to mention sexy and hot, people that we know. It's nice to see just how much she has grown since we first met her..hehehe.

I always ask Chelsea if I can borrow them so I could walk into a board meeting at work.  I would love to see the reaction!  

Jane    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on April 09, 2003, 02:02:07 AM
Hey, I recognize somebody in that pic...It's Nosey from the "Name Of The Game" video.  Word!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on April 09, 2003, 02:50:42 AM
Where's the lower half of the picture?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: squirrelkinns on April 09, 2003, 04:08:16 PM
Just a quick chime in here but it just accured to me, but to get maximum 'stretch' out of human skin, without stretch marks, you first stretch, then relax, then stretch again but just a little bit further. repeat until desired effect is achieved, case in point Chelsea's breasts but also this is done all the time with siamese-twins prior to seperation. So she just might not be through just yet.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on April 15, 2003, 12:20:35 AM
i just came across a photo of when chelsea measured her bust for a magazine shoot when she first came on the scene, when her breasts were no where the size they are not.  back then, they measured 60 inches.  can anyone fathom exactly what size they are now?  my guess would be in the 70-75 inch range.  (sorry i cannot post the pic due to copyright reasons).

ps- does anyone have the fan picture of her in a red sox jersey?  ive been looking for it forever....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: pgolden on April 15, 2003, 02:11:23 AM
Yeah Juggernaut, I would have to say that Chelsea's breast measurements have to be in the 70's by now. If not, then surely she must be short of 70 inches by one or two inches at the most, but really, how could she not have hit 70 inches by now? I'm surprised that even though she usally updates us with how her doctors say her breast volume keeps increasing, she never says "now I'm at 67 inches.... now 69, etc". Even still, she's undoubtably the biggest of them all. Cya  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on April 15, 2003, 06:21:44 AM
The biggest and still getting bigger!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 18, 2003, 11:37:28 PM
i was just over at www.hooters.dk checking out the new and improved UG there (i might add its great!), and saw some fairly recent pics of chelsea charms and was inspired to peek through some photos of her.  i remembered that when she first posed in score when she first exploded both chest and stature-wise on the big-bust scene, she measured 60 inches (there was a photo of her in that pictoral so we know its not some silly 150ZZZZZZZ type number).  and this is when she was, dare i say this, small comparatively (i think i must be disturbed to thinking now that she was small then ).

my question is is it now fair to assume that chelsea is now infact the undisputed title holder of the biggest breasts in the world?  she has been growing steadily for the last few years, only getting bigger and bigger by the day.  its time the experts here at the BEA corroborate her rightful title.

ps: i realize the below pic is a little dated, but her breasts are somewhat bigger, not smaller, than pictured here.  plus, i thought the champion sports bra added a nice touch.

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrEff on June 19, 2003, 02:03:37 AM
Thats where my vote goes... I just hope she continues a long career with her bust... and I hope tat keeps expanding too...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: 11 on June 19, 2003, 02:36:11 AM
It depends on whether you mean biggest breasts in absolute terms, or biggest in relation to the rest of the body.. If you look at Chelsea and Maxi Mounds side by side, Maxi's breasts are the same size or slightly larger, but Maxi is of course much taller, so I would say that Chelsea should technically be considered "bustier."  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DruulEmpire on June 19, 2003, 02:37:09 AM
I haven't downloaded an image in a long while, but I HAD to have this one ...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 19, 2003, 03:50:30 AM
i respect what you are saying in regards to relative size between chelsea and maxi, but chelsea has expanded by leaps and bounds.  this was probably true a year or two ago.  in other words, i think maxi has maintained hers more than chelsea, draining more bodily serum and tissue growth collected by the string implants than chelsea.  anyone agree or have other explanations or opinions?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Reaver on June 19, 2003, 04:02:28 AM
I think Nadine Jansen could be in the running here.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: the_squirrel on June 19, 2003, 04:05:58 AM
The absolutely honest reply from me is that Chelsea has the most immediate "effect" on me of all my many objects of busty admiration & for me size is a HUGE priority.

That is despite her boobs being oddly shaped in the cold light of day (never mind the nipples, what about the vertical faces either side of her cleavage)

But all that is forgotten when a new set of pics comes to light....

In the words of another hero (Eric Clapton)....Keep on growin.....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 19, 2003, 04:05:59 AM
nadine sure has size, i agree, but i dont think she is quite in the ranks of chelsea, maxi and minka.  not yet at least.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on June 19, 2003, 08:28:12 AM
Having been fortunate enough to have met both Chelsea and Maxi in the flesh, I can tell you that Chelsea is actually bigger in absolute terms and, apparently, growing all the time. There's not much in it, but Chelsea breasts the tape (aargh!) first.

Both Maxi and Chelsea are charming, friendly and sweet.

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on June 19, 2003, 10:44:34 AM
I still think this needs closer investigation ...

-Munch "Shotgun !!!!!!!" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: boobman69 on June 19, 2003, 03:32:10 PM
Hope the moderator doesn't mind a little plug for my Chelsea site here.  It's a free fan site with weekly updates of rare, unpublished Chelsea pics:

http://www.sarennamania.com/chelsea/chelsea.html


Enjoy!    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on June 19, 2003, 08:21:18 PM
I think it is safe to say that when we say that Chelsea has "the world's biggest bust", we actually mean "the world's biggest bust that got that way via an implant". Among women with natural boobs, it seems that the title should correctly go to Norma Stitz.

And another assumption is that when we say that, we also mean "the biggest bust that we know about".

</pedantic post>
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on June 19, 2003, 09:53:04 PM
What about Tina Small???

-Munch "Woohoo, I am the master Baiter" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: pgolden on June 19, 2003, 10:02:23 PM
One possible contender for the biggest breasts that I haven't heard mentioned yet is B.B. Gunns. I don't know if anyone has seen recent pics of her, but she is HUGE, I mean really big. Most people compare Chelsea and Maxi as being the biggest two in the industry, I think the two biggest are actually Chelsea and B.B., with Maxi pulling up just behind them.

Chelsea is probably most undoubtably the biggest, but I think judging from recent pics, Chelsea outmeasures B.B. by only a very small amount. Anyone care to agree?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on June 20, 2003, 12:28:25 AM
Quote:

Chelsea outmeasures B.B. by only a very small amount. Anyone care to agree?    




I would *love* to agree, however, I haven't seen any very recent pictures of BB to coroborate the stories I keep hearing.  She is certain;y a big girl, but how big?  Someone show us a recent picture, please!!

Breast regards

Whinston.

P.S>  Keisha Evans, if she gets her wishes granted, will blow them all away in time and her skin appears to have the stretch-ability to pull it off.  Too bad Dr. J isn't around anymore, It'd be interesting to see Keisha with 10,000CC of string and watch them grow.  Holy crap, that's mind boggling.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 20, 2003, 04:05:08 AM
youre right.  from what ive seen of bb guns lately, shes gaining on chelsea quite speedily.  there is a gym set of her in a orange leotard which shows her ever increasing figure quite well.

im still convinced that chelsea is the yet uncontested leader in the biggest bust field though.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on June 20, 2003, 12:51:49 PM
Quote:

 ...there is a gym set of her in a orange leotard which shows her ever increasing figure quite well.





Hey Juggernaut;

Thanks for the input!  Can you post a sample pic of BB in that outfit you mentioned?  BTW, have you check out Keisha yet?  That's simply unbelievable...that someone of those proportions could suddenly appear out of thin air!

Regards

W
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on June 20, 2003, 03:26:38 PM
BB Gunns is definitely approaching maximum boobage as evidenced by recent photos of her at the photoclubs site. I have noticed one thing though - is it just me or is Chelsea Charms actually starting to slowly reduce. I have noticed that in her most recent photoset posted at chelseacharms.com (not the photoclubs site) that she indeed appears a bit smaller. I have a suspicion that she made a trip to see the legendary Dr. Johnson in Houston who drained some of the fluid from her string implants. But this simply means that she will continue to expand to where she was again. She is indeed tremendous in the latest Photoclubs photos which were taken all together when she was still huge.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on June 20, 2003, 05:29:05 PM
Quote:

is it just me or is Chelsea Charms actually starting to slowly reduce.    




Hi Davastav;

The photo set you're referring to in the greenish dress is actually an old one that was just recently posted.  It is from about 2001, according to her hair length.  The Photoclubs previews and recent bosomquest episodes are more exact to her actual size!  She is bigger than ever and continues to grow, according to informed sources.

Do not worry!  Keep the faith!  And besides, we have a new star in the BE heavens:  Keisha Evans!  (Maybe she should change her name to Keisha Heavens!).

All the breast,

W
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on June 20, 2003, 08:19:07 PM
Some small <img src="/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" /> but recent pics.

(photoclubs/bosomquest content removed)

see yaa...  =)
  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on June 20, 2003, 09:09:15 PM
Thanks for the info Whin - I was getting very depressed about those photos of Chelsea. But it was an honest mistake - I think at some point she is going to have to go for a "juicing" before she explodes. Yes - on Photoclubs - she is busty beyond belief now.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 21, 2003, 05:00:18 AM
looks like gabybag beat me to posting the pics.

anyways, ya, keisha is quite amazing!  one of my new favs, thats for sure.  like you said, it blows my mind how a woman like keisha can explode on the big breast scene like she has.  im sure we can expect her to enter the ranks of the greats, especially with the bosom she currently is packing, which she has scheduled to enlarge further in the next couple of months!  i say keep a close eye on her.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Maxi_Mounds on June 22, 2003, 04:32:07 AM
Hi Guys,
Since even I don't know the answer to the eternal question (ha ha), I'll leave it to the experts here. To help you in your quest here's a pic from one of my most recent sets, shot a couple of weeks ago. Enjoy.
By the way, if you're quick you can catch a glimpse of me and Kayla at the AVN on the latest episode of Family Business on Showtime. Thanks for the support and have a great weekend.

Luv,
Maxi  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on June 22, 2003, 05:01:12 AM
HIHI Maxi ... glad to see you posting

-Munch "Fanboy mode activated" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jaytas on June 22, 2003, 05:08:26 AM
Nice pic as usual Maxi.

The only true way to determine largest bust is to do a liquid diplacement test. This will give the absolute volume of the breasts. Mass of course cannot be calculated as implants and fatty tissue have a different structure and therefore weight.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DruulEmpire on June 22, 2003, 03:28:39 PM
Jaytas is of course referring to the classic tale we all get in grade school -- in math, science, or both -- of Archimedes.  However, he is referring specifically to the adult version which then gets cleaned up for the classroom.  Archimedes had managed to stoke up an ancient Greek equivalent of a hot tub, and was sitting around in a towel while watching his date that night, this beautiful chick with sizable juggs, take her first tentative dip into the tub.  However, she simply dangled her boobs into the water and gave them a nice loving bath for Archimedes's voyeuristic benefit.  Trouble was, a problem had been weighing on his head all day, the problem of proving the authenticity of an allegedly valuable gift to the king by not only weighing it but getting its total volume so as to determine its density.  Ever the scientist, he could not help but notice that the tub water rose slightly when displaced by the volume of those magnificent mammaries.  Suddenly he had his solution, and that was when he ran naked through the streets, crying "YOU'RE E-CUP!"    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: the_squirrel on June 23, 2003, 05:45:52 AM
just checked out the latest BosomQuest Chelsea pics - she is definitely getting even bigger
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: homevintner on June 25, 2003, 05:43:25 AM
Thanks for the pic Maxi. You're as stunning as always.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on June 25, 2003, 08:40:06 AM
A propos of not too much here is a pic to show how BB Gunns has been the architect of her own beauty.

Gawblesser

 

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on June 26, 2003, 05:37:06 AM
look to head to the usa in a few months and would like to find out more about chelsea charms private show. I've checked out her website but wonder if there is anywhere to view reviews from the lucky buggers who have already taken up the offer, and reviews on other big busty escorts.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Chili_Palmer on June 26, 2003, 12:31:36 PM
Don't waste your time (or money) on a CC private show. If you have that kind of green to throw around on an escort and you want a positive (and fulfilling) porn star experience, go with Lisa Lipps or Ashley Evans, among many others.

CP  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jaytas on June 26, 2003, 12:51:55 PM
I have seen the prices they charge. From memory 24 hours is about between 10 and 17 grand. That is a hell of a lot of money to have somebody escort you around.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: solvegas on June 27, 2003, 12:12:54 AM
I did have a private dance with chelsea and it was disapointing. She did not remove anything but her top and she wasn't friendly. She was probably sick or she just doesn't like what she's doing. But MINKA, WOWWW!!! she was great and funny and wanted to please and I was happy. So there it is. Chelsea's breast are awe inspiring though and at least I've seen and played with the biggest tits in the world (that I know of).  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ubu on June 29, 2003, 12:17:26 AM
The above expressed sentiments, although a tad uncharitable, are not seriously inaccurate. I can't say more in a public forum.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Thedoctor on June 29, 2003, 12:24:16 AM
explain with more information  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BarneyFife on June 29, 2003, 12:59:44 AM
   Have to agree with above statements.Not much to say about the dance other than nothing goes on than to squeeze the biggest boobs in the world.Sorry to disappoint if your looking for more.As far as talking to chelsea she is fairly quiet.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Boobstore on June 30, 2003, 02:34:35 AM
Well, if u want to touch the biggest tits on the earth... Chelsea is Chelsea.

Cya    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Anime/BE Tiger on June 30, 2003, 02:39:21 AM
Hey, is there any other busty models than Chelsea Charms who do private shows?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: the_squirrel on June 30, 2003, 02:45:58 AM
This is all a HUGE disappointment. It's hard to imagine what one is supposed to do when face with such monster boobs one to one.

Bury oneself in them would be a start ;-)

but for the prices advertised, some enthusiasm on the part of their owner would seem reasonable.

Is it really that bad?

No "relief" from to-be-expected built up tensions?

would be interested to hear via PM  from Chili or whoever as Ms Charms holds endless fascination for me & was intending to visit next time she hit a metropolis near me  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jaytas on June 30, 2003, 03:29:03 AM
Yes there are others. Melonie has posted a link to a site that deals with that a few times. But the prices are not cheap to say the least.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jithero on June 30, 2003, 05:49:14 AM
i believe that would be www.bodymiracle.com .. good site.. personally if I was so inclined to spend the money I'd go for Elizabeth Starr..
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jaytas on June 30, 2003, 10:01:20 AM
Yerp that's the place all right. If money was no object this would be a good thing to spend it on I guess.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 10, 2003, 08:49:06 PM
I was just reminded of Chelsea Charms' first photos (not really first, but the ones from when she burst onto the mega breast scene along with fellow new stringers Minka, Kayla Kleevage, Melonie Charm, Maxi Mounds, Kayla Kleevage, among others (forgive me for those I missed).  I was wondering if anyone has more of Chelsea in the brown outfit she's in here.  Thanks!  (bigger versions of these as well):
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 10, 2003, 08:49:36 PM
another:
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 10, 2003, 08:53:38 PM
another:
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 10, 2003, 08:56:34 PM
last one:
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: boobman69 on August 11, 2003, 04:19:01 AM
check my site this week!  I'm just updating it now and I will put your request up for you!  

http://www.sarennamania.com/chelsea/chelsea.html
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on August 11, 2003, 04:32:22 AM
Funny thing, sides the slightly bigger breasts, she really doesnt look much different. How long ago were these originals taken?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 12, 2003, 04:49:28 AM
any reason why all those pictures are bitmaps (.bmp)?  i cannot save them as .jpg for some reason.  yes, on other pages i can.  weird.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 12, 2003, 05:09:08 AM
Does anyone have the original first pics of chelsea posted here at the BEA a few years ago?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: boobman69 on August 12, 2003, 12:26:23 PM
hey man I got them all.  If anyone wants to trade for bosomquest or chelseacharms.com videos, then you've got any pic you want.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on August 13, 2003, 08:18:06 PM
I believe this was the very first pic of Chelsea over the net.



see yaa...  =)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on September 24, 2003, 10:47:41 PM
I know this was discussed in earlier threads but seem unable to locate them now - Chelsea Charms is in New York next week an I finally decided to contact her for an appointment for a private dance (session). Can anyone here give me an idea what I can expect. I know that she is not a prostitute and she essentially does a lapdance for either a 1/2 hour or an hour ( I doubt I would last that long). Is she friendly, does she allow the person to touch her etc? I figured as someone else said here that before she retires and "deflates" its probably one of the few breast fantasies that can be fulfilled.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Chili_Palmer on September 24, 2003, 11:58:37 PM
If you have absolutely no expectations of what a true porn star experience should be like, then go ahead and burn your $750 on her.

In ALL my years of private dances and much more with porn stars, I've never had a more disappointing experience than I had with CC earlier this year.

From the lackluster greeting at the door, to actually counting the money in front of me (another first), to setting the timer so that you get EXACTLY 60 minutes (god forbid she gives you one extra minute of her time), to the fact that you DON'T GET TO TAKE YOUR CLOTHES OFF, there are so many other big busted porn stars who charge the equivalent or less and deliver so much more that it just isn't worth being with this zero personality gal in private. On the escort boards, the phrase most bandied about to describe her is "cold fish." Aside from "Hello", "Do you have the rest of the money?" and "The pants stay on", I can't think of anything else she said to me. Oh yeah, "Time's up."  

That said, here is what you do get: unlimited access to her otherworldly breasts. Touch 'em, squeeze 'em, lick 'em, suck 'em, hold 'em up and drop 'em down, stick your head between 'em til you can't breathe and then do it again. And again. You honestly have no idea just how much bigger she is than anyone else out there. If that's enough for you (and you will last the entire time, because as far as CC is concerned, Ken dolls ARE anatomically correct), then knock yourself out and make the appointment. I managed to do a few other things with her I won't get into here, but that's just me. OTOH, if you want a little more value for your hard earned dollar, then wait for Lisa Lipps, Ashley Evans, Minka or any number of other SCORE babes to visit NY and get everything you paid for.

Caveat emptor, my friend.

Chili
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on September 25, 2003, 12:23:00 AM
We have used these words to describe Chelsea before...but you won't find a more elegant or classy lady anywhere. We can tell you this much...you could sit and talk with her for an hour and have a great time. Have fun.

-D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on September 25, 2003, 02:33:10 AM
$750 to sit and talk with her? Please. I can think of much better things to do with that kind of money than sit down and talk with an exceptionally large breasted woman.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gOOber on September 25, 2003, 02:59:12 AM
   I get paid to do porn stars, you sorry wankers.  

     
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Traxellus on September 25, 2003, 05:13:54 AM
God bless Ron Jeremy...oh wait he already has.  Many times over.

Take care.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: EgregiousSamuel on September 25, 2003, 06:22:55 AM
Chili, what do other porn stars let you do?  Can you give me an example of what, for example, a Minka private would be like?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Paladin on September 25, 2003, 12:07:02 PM
Chili:  While I agree that Chelsea's demeanor is rather cold, she did allow me to go further than I thought she would.  Maybe that's because I took hold of the reins in order to see how far she would allow me to go.  By the end of the hour long "session" we were both nude and I had completely discharged a load all over myself.  I was a complete gentleman the entire time, never crossing any lines.  I just figured that for $750 and no intercourse, I might as well see just how far I can take this.  She allowed me to touch her ALL over.  I went so far as to manipulate her using my fingers (you heard me right).  She even enjoyed it!  So why did I say she seemed cold?  She did count the money in front of me, but more importantly, she closed her eyes as if she were thinking of somebody else.  Now I don't expect her to be sexually attracted to a complete stranger, but at the very least you can put on a show for the guy who just shelled out $750.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining.  In fact, after reading many of your responses here on the forum, I actually feel really good about my experience with Chelsea.  Look, the chick is a pure professional who's primary goal is to rack up as many dollars as she can get while the gettin' is good.  Why do you think she rarely appears in clubs any more?  Most of her business is focused around private sessions.  It was a good experience for me, I'm glad I had an opportunity to get that far with one of the most unique women on the planet, but I think my days of paying a women for ANY type of sexual favors is over.  Hadn't done it before, won't do it again.  But it was worth it just that one time.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Blax12 on September 25, 2003, 12:34:57 PM
 Paraphrasing a Christian De Sica's (son of famous Vittorio) line: "750 dollari? Ma io co' 750 dollari, si vojo, me carzo 'e mejo bucione da qui a Stoccolma via Bombay".

Trnslt from Rome dialect:

"750 bucks? With 750 bucks, if I want to, I could fuck the best hookers from here to Stockholm via Bombay".

Blax12    
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: psowden on September 25, 2003, 02:39:25 PM
How far Chelsea will go seems to depend upon her mood and the person she is with.  I have heard that she has so far as to have done what amounts to full service appointments, but in general it appears that she sets out with the intention of only providing a lap dance and you have to charm anything else out of her.  i don't know her and have never met her but I have always had the impression that she has a personal side and a professional side and the two are vastly different.  This is perhaps a little unfortunate, but then she might have a perfectly good reason for this and I'm not going to criticise her for this or her desire to make money.  I'm still in two minds as to whether to see her next time I am in the states, there simply isn't anyone out there like her for size, but if you do I hope u have a nice time.
As for the guy who wonders what other women do, well you pay for their time and company only, anything else that happens is purely between consenting partners.  If you still aren't aware of what escorts do then perhaps your had better not consider spending your money on one.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Paladin on September 25, 2003, 02:51:02 PM
psowden speaks the truth.  Go in with a good attitude, be presentable, well groomed, and most of all charming.  NOT macho.  Be nice.  Be polite.  Don't be afraid to touch her.  She'll like your effort.  Be confident and you may get a little more than you expected.  DO NOT expect sex.  It won't happen.  But you can definately get alot more than a dance and a bad case of blue balls.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on September 25, 2003, 02:53:42 PM
It sounds like from these posts that a "private dance" is just that. I have heard some on this board insinuate that a lot more goes on.  Apparently that is not necessarily true.  At least in the case of Chelsea.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Paladin on September 25, 2003, 02:58:28 PM
"a lot more goes on" does not go on.  Nobody gets sex.  I'm surprised that these women put their lives at risk in the first place.  They meet complete strangers in a hotel room...ALONE!  I would never, ever place myself in that position if I were an adult starlet.  But if you are nice, confident, and do not cross any lines, you can certainly get more than just a "dance".  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on September 25, 2003, 03:27:17 PM
I would be surprised if they are really "alone." They may be creating the illusion of alone by using 2 hotel rooms that are connected.  At almost a grand a pop, it would not be too much to pay for security in this way.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: EgregiousSamuel on September 25, 2003, 04:40:58 PM
Seriously dude, they are not alone in the least.  One scream and Gigantor in the next room breaks down the door and hog ties you.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Paladin on September 25, 2003, 05:03:02 PM
Maybe, maybe not.  Remember that these high-maintenance feature dancers stay at only the best hotels.  If Gigantor goes knockin' down any doors at a Westin, Hyatt, or Hilton, you can be sure that all parties involved would be thrown in the slammer.  **31** is illegal in just about every state.  I think these women wanna keep as low a profile as possible.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on September 25, 2003, 05:47:58 PM
I don't think having your bouncer in an ajoining room raises your profile.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Paladin on September 25, 2003, 05:57:26 PM
No, it certainly does not.  But if the fit hits the shan and Mr. Bodyguard gets rough, hotel security may find out and alert the police.  I'm not saying they don't travel with bodyguards.  Hell, it's probably a good idea.  But if something WERE to happen and the cops were called onto the scene, the one providing the private session would be arrested for **31**.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on September 25, 2003, 06:06:16 PM
Yes, but if bad shit happened without a bodyguard, the cops would still be called. There would still be an inquiry into what happened.  The bodyguard does not lessen the chance of a disturbance, only lessens the chance that Chelsea gets hurt.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: upenout on September 25, 2003, 07:01:54 PM
Bodyguards?!?  Police?!?  Gee, now that you've all scared the bejeezus out of Davastav, I wonder what he will decide to do.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Paladin on September 25, 2003, 07:07:11 PM
If yer a decent human being, you have nothing to worry about.  Go in with good intentions and have a blast!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on September 25, 2003, 07:16:47 PM
There is always a small risk that some busy body desk clerk will call the cops to find out what Chelsea is up to. Gigantic boobs are hard to conceal.  A stream of guys coming into the hotel, and it doesn't take a genius. I have never heard of such and incident, so the risk must be minimal.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on September 25, 2003, 07:32:44 PM
Yeah. Chelsea's profile is really low.
That's rich.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Chili_Palmer on September 26, 2003, 01:07:12 AM
Paladin:

Appreciate the comments and your feedback on CC's performance. As for my time with Chelsea, I got to enjoy dining at her sopping wet "Y", but that is definitely a "your mileage may vary" issue.

However, I must disagree on your definition of "professional" as it relates to adult entertainment and private encounters. Happily (or sadly, depending upon your perspective), I've probably had as much if not more experience with porn/big boob escorts as anyone on this board, and Chelsea easily rates in the bottom percentile of this group (in fact, only Sofia Staks gets a lower rating from me).

Let us compare and contrast CC with, say, Lisa Lipps, who is, for lack of a better term, the anti-Chelsea.

CC: contact via e-mail only
LL: contact via e-mail, followed up by personal phone call(s) from Lisa

CC: nice hotel by airport, single room, double beds
LL: upscale hotel on the westside, multi-room suite, queen size bed

CC: answers door in everyday robe, make-up and hair ok
LL: answers door in form-fitting white mini-skirt and matching top, perfect make-up and hair

CC: timid hello and demand for payment
LL: Big hug and open mouth kiss, pre-arranged to put $$$ envelope on the table (assistant will count it later).

CC: sets timer, begins air dance
LL: offers a beverage or other refreshment, then we retire to the bedroom

CC: still standing, continues dances, allows unfettered access to the twins
LL: rip each other's clothes off, battle of the tongues ensues

CC: slowly undresses, leaves panties on, but your pants ain't coming off, and she ain't touching below the belt.
LL: anything and everything is on the menu, and it's even better than you thought it would be.

CC: Time's up, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
LL: nice cool down, shower if desired, kiss goodbye.

Now you tell me: within the context of adult entertainment, who is the true professional and who is the one trying to do the least and get the most?

Quite honestly, it is women such as Chelsea who provide so little while charging so much and customers like yourself who deem this attitude as acceptable simply because you are thrilled that the dancer deigns to be in the same room as you, that creates problem for true consumers like me. As long as the Internet creates an inexhaustible supply of people who are willing to be taken advantage of (and make no mistake about it, that is exactly what happened), then the Chelsea Charms of the world will continue to flourish. At some point, someone has to point out that the emperor has no clothes (which would put him one up on me  ).

Chili
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Thedoctor on September 26, 2003, 01:58:16 AM
none  have bodyguards. 99% travel alone and are alone in the hotel. many hotel clerks get cash from girl to keep mouth shut and do favors.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: solvegas on September 26, 2003, 03:04:19 AM
I hate to agree with chili , but Chelsea was a disapointment especially compared to Minka . Minka cleaned my pipes and afterward gave me the skinny on her life and joked and we took a shower together and was real nice to me . I've bought much merchandaise from her throught the years and so she was very attentive to me and made feel good . That's why I've done Minka more than once while Chelsea got my business once . I don't reget my time with Chelsea because those TITS are amazing , but no more . Plenty of women in the business look down on the fans and with Chelsea I got the impression this was something to endure . You live only once in life and sometimes you have to take chances .  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on September 26, 2003, 03:25:11 AM
Well, I haven't been with a big name dancer like Chelsea or Lisa yet, but I have had local escorts.

In all my experiences, I called the escort number, and some guy or woman answers and asks what I'm looking for.

I give him or her a description of what I want as far as looks and personality (I'm usually vague on the personality part though if the looks match up). Then they give me the price and ask if I agree on it ($200-$300 usually).

Then they contact the girl and later she calls me. After a short conversation, she asks if I want her to arrive and I give her my location. Later she arrives with a friend waiting in the car (or so I'm told. I never see the person she said she arrived with).

Then the escort usually gives me a kiss, some cheap small talk, and then she starts a slow undressing, followed by making out with me, and then straight into intercourse or a blowjob or whatever.

I am always polite, kind, and try to be a little funny and make her laugh. Maybe I try to be romantic and charming too...or should I say, I TRY to be charming. Being a gentleman the whole time. Lord knows, I don't want to be an ass and have "unexpected visitors".

When we are done, we chat for a bit, ger dressed, a kiss good-bye and on to sweet dreams for me.

All the escorts I have had are like that. Before my first experience I thought it was just like a private dance at a strip club only this time being at a hotel. Now I see it is just a front for **31** (well, in my experiences anyway).

Not that I mind. If I got more than I expected, that is ALWAYS cool! But I have to admit that I get scared that the cops will charge in any minute because someone rats on you.

I was just wondering, is that what it was like for you guys? Is it set up to be a private dance and becomes a sex session?

I was wondering how being with a big name starlet is different as far as the set up, how you meet and if they sometimes have sex with you...or come close to it.

Chili, you said "anything and everthing on the menu". Is that what you meant? Did you have sex with her?

How was the whole meeting, as far as first contact to the bedroom?

As I said, I have local escorts and enjoyed all my times with them, but haven't been with a major starlet yet. Any more info?






 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BarneyFife10 on September 26, 2003, 03:46:47 AM
 I have to agree with Chilli about Chelsea it is just as he described. While she did not ask for the money I gave it to her myself without her asking. As far as the experience it is mind blowing seeing her live and up close but if your trying to ask her questions and wonder more about her other than looking at the most incredible boobs in the business your in for a let down.Chelsea is not very talkative and does not hold a conversation well.Of course I am there to see the most incredible breasts and Chelsea who is still gorgeous.Lets put it this way beauty a 10 personality a 2. As Chilli mentioned I think there is a business side that she does not open up to anyone and a personal side. Any fantasies that you may have will not happen. It is just like a lap dance but you get all the boob touching you want that's it.No more and a few sentences in between from chelsea. I sometimes wonder why I spent 750 dollars but at least I got it out of my system.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on September 26, 2003, 08:21:02 AM
Quote:

then the Chelsea Charms of the world will continue to flourish.




Would it really be that bad if there were hoards of Chelsea Charms look-a-likes running around?

-Munch "only if they were Munchelseas" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: 3pyon on September 26, 2003, 08:37:47 AM
I would like to know what kinds of jobs you guys have, so i can order as many escorts as i like :P
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on September 26, 2003, 08:44:24 AM
Quote:

I would like to know what kinds of jobs you guys have, so i can order as many escorts as i like :P  




Well, to be honest, I don't make enough to have them as often as I like.

I treat myself every couple of months or so...depends on whether or not I have a girlfriend or if "it's been awhile".

Yeah, I paid for it. I got it and that's what counts.

I can't always get it for free, so if I need it bad enough, she's sexy enough, and I have enough money...I go for it!

Pride? What's that? I have no pride in this area of my life.

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on September 26, 2003, 09:29:23 AM
I'm glad my fiance' and I live together!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on September 26, 2003, 11:11:50 AM
chilli or someone that can help. where are these escort boards to read reviews with the minka's etc. there was a good yahoo group similar but i lost the link.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Champy on September 26, 2003, 11:45:09 AM
I have to say that this thread is the most interesting I've read in a long time.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Paladin on September 26, 2003, 12:36:50 PM
Chilli:  I agree with your comments in regards to her attitude 100%.  I said that in my initial post.  I found her demeanor to be cold, her performance to be lackluster, and her unwillingness to make very little physical contact with me after we were both completely nude somewhat annoying.

That was the first time I had EVER paid a woman for ANY type of sexual favors.  I even missed her on one occasion because I wasn't sure if I really wanted to pay ANYBODY that much money for a session.  But do to the very original circumstances of her having the biggest friggin tits in the world, I thought that one time with a legend might be interesting.  And while I did not walk away from that experienced as blown away as I really should have (see above reasons why), I had an opportunity to meet, greet and play with the biggest (in more ways than one) mega-tit adult starlet out there today.

Even after reading these posts and seeing that I may have had a better time than most, I still feel somewhat disappointed by her poor attitude towards the fans who make her what she is today:  one of the most successful adult entertainers out there.  Her attitude towards these fans who pay good money to see her perform is unacceptable.  But for a one time experience with a woman who under normal circumstances I would never have the opportunity to meet, I'd say that it was a good one.  That does not mean that it will be good for someone else.  I would never pay another woman for her services.  Not because of my experience with Chelsea, but because I feel like a giant loser having to pay some chick just ta get a little play.  Maybe Minka or Lisa Lipps would have provided me with a much more memorable experience.  I'll never know because I aint payin' up again.  I wanted the biggest and most talked about entertainer, and I had even originally hesitated on that.

If you are comfortable enough financially and you REALLY wanna do this, then go ahead.  Be nice, be presentable, and be confident.  Do what you want to do (to a certain degree ofcourse) and you will have a pretty good time.  Just know that she is not the friendliest person around, and based on what has been said in this thread, you may wanna consider other options (eg: Minka).      
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: psowden on September 26, 2003, 03:14:38 PM
I think Chelsea is fortunate in that she is in a unique situation.  The shear size of her breasts means that despite her limits, the bad reviews and everything else that is said about her people are still tempted.  If If her boobs were a touch smaller, she would be in direct competition with several other women and i reckon she would struggle to earn money unless she upped her game.  The only reason I am considering seeing her the next time I'm in the States is because she is unique, take away that uniqueness and given all i have read and been told I wouldn't bother wasting my money.  i don't see her approach changing, which is unfortunate, as there is no sign that she will losse her unique selling point anytime in the near future.
I have actually read on some boards and heard personally from people who i trust that on occasion Chelsea has gone all the way, not that it was earth shattering.  I reckon if your going to book an appointment you should do so with out expectations and then , because I think that given the evidence we can conclude occassionally she will go further, hope for a bit more so anything extra is a bonus. Personaly I fancy that an English accent and good old fashioned British Charm will see me through as American ladies are real suckers for that. lol.
I think the issue of paying to spend time with a woman is a matter of personal opinion.  For me it is about a fantasy, not a basic need for sex, and having a chance to fulfill that fantasy.  I have a thing for women with large implants but these women are rare and the only realistic way for me to experience what it is like is to pay.  I've certainly never felt bad, dirty, guilty or anything else negative about it, but I do believe if you do have doubts or question the morality etc then perhaps it is not for you.  For the bloke who said after Chelsea he wouldn't see anyone else i would say that if the reason was because you felt bad after a bad experience then i wouldn't let that put you off, there are some amazing women offering fantastic experiences out there.  But if, as I suspect it is because your not too sure about whether it is right to pay for a womans services then I'm sorry the one experience you had was not brilliant and you are right to not try again.  
the guy who says a private dance is simply a private dance is wrong in 99% of cases.  Its a euphamism.  the question of security is a more difficult one.  Some women do have  security with them, Lisa Lipps I know for a fact does, but not all do and it appears to be common with those who are offering incall.  Outcall [where the woman visits your room] by its very nature makes security a touch more difficult.  I'm told some have people who park near by and call when the appointment is up.  But I've met women as they were dropped off and called them a cab when they go to leave so at no time has there been a security presence near by.  Risky? Probably.
You don't have to be rich or have a great job to see a large breasted model for a private show.  The price for an hour can start at $300 an hour [moving upto $1500] which is in most peoples reach.  I saw my first woman while travelling around the US just after I graduated, so I wasn't exactly loaded.  If you save a couple of hundred dollars a month then you would be able to see many of the ladies every couple of months.  Its simply a question of whether you want to do it enough to make saving for it a priority. Also some of the women go way over the time you pay for.  It doesn't always happen, or with every woman and I won't name names because no woman should face a 'but you gave another bloke xxx extra hours for free' situation, but I've paid for one or two hours and ended up having three to five hours.  That makes it seem a lot less expensive.  You just have to be a gentleman.
the bloke wanting to know where to find more should check out theeroticreview.com
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ninjrk on September 27, 2003, 12:58:29 PM
Quote:



However, I must disagree on your definition of "professional" as it relates to adult entertainment and private encounters. Happily (or sadly, depending upon your perspective), I've probably had as much if not more experience with porn/big boob escorts as anyone on this board, and Chelsea easily rates in the bottom percentile of this group (in fact, only Sofia Staks gets a lower rating from me).
   




I hope that I'm not opening a can of worms, but can I ask about Sofia Staks?  I've not had private time with her, just hung out a bit with her at a couple of clubs.  She seemed very nice and affectionate there so I wouldn't have expected such low marks.  

Thanks,
Matt  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on September 27, 2003, 03:20:12 PM
Can you compare your Minka experience to you Chelsea experience for us please?  I need to get a private dance from Minka already.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on September 27, 2003, 04:15:50 PM
She must be bigger now.  Has she grown recently?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Chili_Palmer on September 27, 2003, 05:56:53 PM
When I comment on an escort/dancer's performance, my comments are directed towards the encounter itself, not the escort as an individual. I'm sure, as Dick & Jane pointed out very early in this thread, that Chelsea is a very sweet girl. But as an escort (which is what she advertises as when she comes to town), she is close to a zero and not worth the outrageous amount she overcharges her fans.

As for Sofia, I met her about 8 years ago at a place we Los Angeles hobbyists euphemistically refer to as the "Silverlake house." I've seen probably 15 performers there, including Holly Body, Kimberly Kupps, Domonique Simone and many more. Some, like Holly, I've seen probably 20 times and had a great time every time. Never rushed, all positions on the menu, sometimes multiple pops allowed.

With Sofia, when she went to lie down, her breasts did not move at all. Not a millimeter. In addition, the bottom of the breasts are flat. The best comparison I can make is they're like toeholds on those fake mountain climbing apparatus, except the mountains have more give than Sofia's boobs. A Grade Z boob job, should be the textbook example of how not to get 'em done. Worse, as I am just starting to go down on her, the friggen doorbell rings (less than 15 minutes into our 60 minute session) and it's her next client. For someone like me, who likes to take his time and has control over his orgasms, that just doesn't cut it. I left pissed off and very unsatisfied.

Juggernaut: I saw Minka through a friend of a friend when I was in Vegas. Very friendly, a good performer, enthusiastic but not overly vocal, all positions available. Definite enjoyable experience and I'll see her again when the opportunity presents itself.

Btw, if you're going to Vegas to see her, stop by Olympic Gardens after 9 PM and see Lacey Legends and Europe Dichan. Both are wonderful ladies and who knows where some good conversation (and a few lapdances) can lead.

Play safe,

Chili
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on September 27, 2003, 06:19:15 PM
Chelsea...bigger?  











From Ebay Link 1 & Link 2.

see yaa...  =)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on September 27, 2003, 06:36:44 PM
Thanks for all the pics! Expecially the ones of BB over time!

And great story Druul!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DruulEmpire on September 27, 2003, 07:40:39 PM
How sweet to see a thread like this bumped back up every three months or so.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on September 28, 2003, 01:29:41 AM
WOW!  She is absolutely huge now!!!  Breasts aside, I love what she did with her hair!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on September 28, 2003, 04:13:33 AM
So where can I find more recent pics of Chelsea?

Picked this up in a Yahoo group. Is this new as well? 2002 I know, but has much changed since?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on September 28, 2003, 05:23:35 AM
According to what I've read, Chelsea allowed herself to grow, as in not having fluid removed, so she could appear at her largest for a Photoclubs shoot. As I understand it, that was in July. The Fan Fair Pics were in August. I think she's grown even larger. Just my Humble, Horny Opinion.

Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on September 28, 2003, 05:29:39 AM
Do you know which Photoclubs set is was for?  She has been looking mighty large in all the recent ones, and is absolutely behemoth in those shots of her from Fan Fair.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on September 28, 2003, 05:34:42 AM
Fan Fair? You lost me. Those pics above with her in green from there?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on September 28, 2003, 06:05:17 AM
Those pics are the one's advertised for sale on Ebay. As far as the Photoclubs Pics: The ones that appear to have been done in Florida, beaches and such, are the latest, and largest.

Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on September 28, 2003, 07:29:44 AM
Examples by any chance? I know this isnt one of them.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on September 28, 2003, 12:33:03 PM
Considering that she was at Exotic Expo and Fan Fair a month ago, why is it that I have seen NO pictures from there?  Can anyone confirm that she was there?  Is there any pics?  I have seen pics of other girls but not her...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on September 28, 2003, 01:27:34 PM
Yes she was there looking fabulous. And HUGE.

www.scoreland.com will be running a special on the Expo in a week or two which will show Chelsea in all her splendor. Minka, Echo, Vixen, Colt45 and Maxi too

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on September 28, 2003, 02:02:26 PM
 
Quote:

According to what I've read, Chelsea allowed herself to grow, as in not having fluid removed, so she could appear at her largest for a Photoclubs shoot.  




Where did you read this?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on September 28, 2003, 02:50:40 PM
I can't rememer the title if the thread, but I'm sure I read it here.

Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on September 28, 2003, 03:02:18 PM
Not sure of the date this was taken, of course, but the hair length shows it to be a pre-Fan Fair one.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Angelus on September 30, 2003, 04:43:57 AM
While watching a real video file of Chelsea Charms on a radio talk show, Chelsea went in-depth about her string implants.

According to her, she did not know that the string implants would grow once installed.

That statement shocked, fascinated, and aroused the holy hell out of me.  I even had a talk with my girlfriend about it, and I couldn't BELIEVE that Chelsea did not know what would happen to her once she had the string installed.

Now, the other part of this that bothers me a bit is that I'm not into "NC" stories at all, but something about Chelsea having a lack of control over her body - and specifically her breasts after she did this to herself - I found incredibly hot.  I felt a little guilty about that...

I'd like to open this up to other people and see what they think about this.... either Chelsea's body mods, or non-consentual expansion, etc.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on September 30, 2003, 04:48:15 AM
What talk show was this?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrHHH on September 30, 2003, 04:49:50 AM
Well, the string implants were new at the time. The reasons for getting them were size, weight and cost.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Angelus on September 30, 2003, 04:56:01 AM
Quote:

Well, the string implants were new at the time. The reasons for getting them were size, weight and cost.
   




Doc Johnson knew going in that they expanded.  He said so in the document that was posted on his site.  So why didn't Chelsea know?  I doubt she lied when she was on the talkshow.  

However, Chelsea didn't strike me as the smartest cookie in the jar.  During the course of the talkshow, she had no idea that a ton of her travel, costumes, and other stuff was tax deductible.  Hell, I know nothing about the porn industry and I know implants and stuff are tax deductible.

As for the talkshow - it was an AM news/talk show.  It was NOT a "hot talk" show.  It was more serious oriented, which made me wonder why Chelsea was on it.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on September 30, 2003, 05:06:46 AM
My guess is - everyone knew there would be growth, but no one (possibly not even doc frankenstein) suspected they'd keep growing THAT MUCH...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on September 30, 2003, 05:52:46 AM
And in such, she surprised everyone.

Mind if I ask where you got this file you speak of? Im interested in hearing this.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on September 30, 2003, 07:05:43 AM
CC has made this same statement when her forum opened at chelseacharms.com.

"...she doesn't seem to be the smartest cookie in the jar.."

Granted she's not a rocket scientist, but she has a realtor's license.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Zasha on September 30, 2003, 08:30:19 AM
Quote:



Granted she's not a rocket scientist, but she has a realtor's license.  




There you go!

"If only..." takes on a whole new meaning, yes?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on September 30, 2003, 01:33:12 PM
I think the idea of her continuous growth, without her control, is extremely hot. The idea that she would be ever larger, without the draining that is, is really hot.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Prophet_Tenebrae on September 30, 2003, 01:41:57 PM
So her breasts are actually of sufficient size that she can sell property on them?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: E_W on September 30, 2003, 01:46:21 PM
Quote:

So her breasts are actually of sufficient size that she can sell property on them?  




I'll take the nipples!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Argyle on September 30, 2003, 04:06:32 PM
Quote:



Granted she's not a rocket scientist, but she has a realtor's license.  




Having no knowledge of CC's intellect, I will say that having a realtor's license doesn't mean anything.  I just crossed swords with one who was as moronic as anyone I've ever met--on cross at a depo, she didn't even know what classes/credits she had taken to get her license, or what the procedure of a closing entailed, and admitted that she "forgot" to have *both* the buyer and seller sign the "contract".

Can you say "ditz"?

I hope CC is smarter than that.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveZ on September 30, 2003, 07:34:53 PM
I must agree that a realtor license doesn't mean anything - often times you can take the classes for free, and as long as you have the money (lots of it) to take the exam, you're set.

Steve Z
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on October 01, 2003, 12:16:42 AM
I'm not sure whether Chelsea would appreciate me sharing this fact or not, but during our first meeting she did tell me that when she first got string implants she was only intending to have breasts in the Sarenna Lee size ballpark.  Chelsea was genuinely surprised with the size she had already expanded to (this was over 2 years ago).

Also, Kayla, Minka and Chelsea were among the first girls to get really large string implants.  I am reasonably sure that , at that time, there was no specific knowledge that string implants would have anywhere near as high of an "automatic expansion factor" as they actually turned out to have.  I also am reasonably sure that there was no realization at that time that the expansion would be proportional to the size of the original string implant, instead of simple post-surgery skin stretch breast expansion which happens with regular bag type implants during the first 3-6 months after 'installation', but then stops (often referred to as 'settling' or 'fluffing').

I can confirm that it is indeed a somewhat weird feeling to know that your breasts have a 'mind of their own'.  But to be honest it can also be a really erogenous feeling to wake up the next morning after **94** margaritas all night and find that your boobs have managed to fill up with about 1/2 of those margaritas (due to fluid retention from the salt).  However, this can be a 'pain' too, because once the breast skin has been stretched by the fluid retention, your boobs doesn't shrink back down when the rest of your body gets rid of the salt induced fluid retention !  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 01, 2003, 12:18:52 AM
It boggles the mind.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 01, 2003, 12:19:28 AM
Well, it boggles something.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: E_W on October 01, 2003, 12:25:19 AM
Ohhh... it's like a BE story cliché come to life.  I think I just got the inspiration I needed for my implant BE story.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 01, 2003, 12:29:03 AM
Now yer talkin'.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on October 01, 2003, 12:35:15 AM
The point about the realtor's license coupled with her smooth running of her internet outlets (currently - not at first) indicates a sharp business acumen. Just as Melonie, Dani Ashe, and many of the others have demonstrated. Dani Ashe would be the pinnacle.

Zasha: The "if only" takes on a whole new meaning IF CC is honestly interested in older men. With grey hair and being almost twice her age that might include me! *sigh*  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 01, 2003, 12:38:56 AM
Does anyone know, has any of these mega-titters written anything like a memoir, and autobiography... or even a magazine article sharing their thoughts and experiences? I mean, beyond your usual "I don't like rude people" fluff that you usually get in internet FAQs.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ninjrk on October 01, 2003, 01:01:42 AM
Quote:

  But to be honest it can also be a really erogenous feeling to wake up the next morning after **94** margaritas all night and find that your boobs have managed to fill up with about 1/2 of those margaritas (due to fluid retention from the salt).  However, this can be a 'pain' too, because once the breast skin has been stretched by the fluid retention, your boobs doesn't shrink back down when the rest of your body gets rid of the salt induced fluid retention !  




So, what address should we start sending the Margarita's to?



Matt  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on October 01, 2003, 01:13:50 AM
We will vouch for Chelsea's intellect. She is one of the brightest people we know in any walk of life.

-D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: KonekoRyu on October 01, 2003, 01:40:14 AM
I wonder if that hurts.. having 'em expand like that?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Angelus on October 01, 2003, 03:25:44 AM
I'm gonna take this tack by tack...

1) D&J, I'm sure since you've personally met Chelsea, you can vouch for how nice/pleasant she is... but considering Chelsea is in the business to make money (because let's face facts, no matter how nice/beautiful Chelsea is, she's unique niche/novelty act...) - and for her to claim that she didn't know that a ton of her expenses could be tax deductible, including her implants and the subsequent maintenace of the implants - that's just not very smart.

If you're in the business to make as much money as you possibly can, you should understand how you can make that money.  Chelsea not knowing this does not show very smart business acumen.

2) Comparing Chelsea's site to Danni's site is an absolute joke.  There's no comparison.

3) Speaking as someone who is licensed to sell real estate in three states, it's not that hard.  The annoying part of getting a license is the mandatory classes, not the test taking.

I was wondering where the hell Chelsea pulled the word "chattel" out of on her website, considering that's pretty much a real estate term.  Now I know.  Knowing's half the battle, yo joe.

4) Inspiration for BE Stories - Elvish, I look forward to reading your work.

5) Margaritas - Melonie, if I give you a gift certificate for "On the Border", will you finish filming "The Titty Fairy"?  

Now, finally, I will give Chelsea all the props in the world.  It takes a very, very brave woman to undergo what she's done to herself and what she'll have to go through to undo it all when she decides to retires.  However, on the flipside, if I decided on exotic dancing as a career for myself, I'd have a business plan.  It's not like Chelsea backed into this career - she went supersized because she had a mission to make money.  

But I'm not Chelsea.  I don't know Chelsea.  So I can't speak for her.  

I'm rambling.  This was about ever-expanding breasts, right?  Wha... what happened?  I thought... I thought we were just having fun... I feel like Paul Mercurio in a church right now.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 01, 2003, 03:35:35 AM
Who the heck is he?

I happen to be wondering. Just how old is Chelsea?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Angelus on October 01, 2003, 03:42:06 AM
Quote:

Who the heck is he?

I happen to be wondering. Just how old is Chelsea?  




Paul Mercurio is a comedian who did something very stupid in a church.  Because of this, the lives of 40+ people were drastically affected, Viacom lost millions of dollars, and my drive home from work will be very very boring until July 2004.

On the flip side, because of Paul Mercurio, I have a girlfriend.  That's weird.

D&J, comment?

Oh, and I believe Chelsea is 27-28.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 01, 2003, 04:07:18 AM
Guess you arent going into what "Very Stupid" means in this instance.

Thanks for the info though.

Im sitting here thinking though. Chelsea is massive now, right? What is she going to look like when she gets them taken out? Im picturing really long thin flaps of flesh... eww.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: geoffk on October 01, 2003, 04:47:18 AM
If it's the story that I think you're talking about, then here's the facts:

------------------------------

3 busted in St. Pat's sex stunt
 
A man and woman having sex in a vestibule at St. Patrick's Cathedral - a sleazy prank broadcast live on the shock jock Opie and Anthony radio show - were arrested yesterday after an usher spotted them, police said.  Fans of Dumb and Dumber - Gregg (Opie) Hughes and partner Anthony Cumia - heard the collar over WNEW (102.7 FM).  Charged with public lewdness were Brian Florence, 37, and Loretta Lynn Harper, 35, both of Virginia. Comic Paul Mercurio, who was acting as the couple's lookout, also was busted, charged with acting in concert.

The sexual high jinks at the city's most well-known sacred site came on the Feast of the Assumption, one of the Catholic Church's holy days of obligation.

Joe Zwilling, spokesman for the Archdiocese of New York, said church offices were closed for the feast day, so he hadn't heard about the episode.

"But if it's true, it's disgusting, and that's all that needs to be said," he said.

Sgt. Gerard Beyrodt of Midtown North detectives said the couple was seen about 4:15 p.m. "engaging in some kind of intercourse" in the vestibule of the cathedral's 50th St. **103**.

"An usher thought the guy was urinating, so he approached him and saw the female naked from the hips down," Beyrodt said.

Investigators said the sordid scene was visible to about 20 worshipers and tourists in the cathedral.

Cops said the stunt was part of an annual contest on the show. Contestants get points for having sex at certain sites, with higher points going to the riskier places.

Mercurio was acting as spotter for the couple, looking out for trouble and reporting back to the radio show.

Police said he was on his cell phone to the show when a cop called by the usher grabbed him.
 
--------------------

By the way, I'm not sure if Chelsea can even remove her implants at all.  The string grows freely into the surrounding tissue as it expands until it's all an undifferentiated mass.  It's not like a usual implant, where you just pull out the bag in one piece.

They would probably have to do essentially a partial mastectomy on her, leaving her with nipples and not much else.  Ironically, she might want or need some kind of implant after they finish, just to regain a B or C cup size.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on October 01, 2003, 04:53:03 AM
 
Quote:

 By the way, I'm not sure if Chelsea can even remove her implants at all. The string grows freely into the surrounding tissue as it expands until it's all an undifferentiated mass. It's not like a usual implant, where you just pull out the bag in one piece.

They would probably have to do essentially a partial mastectomy on her, leaving her with nipples and not much else. Ironically, she might want or need some kind of implant after they finish, just to regain a B or C cup size.

 




I think you may be wrong about this.  Kayla Kleevage and Sable had their string implants removed.  Then again both of them did have the string replaced for regular bag implants.  Plus Chelsea has had her string implants for quite some time.  Maybe Melonie can shed some light on this.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Angelus on October 01, 2003, 04:53:10 AM
geoff, thank you for completely killing any remote chance this thread had for "teh funney".

In a morbid side note, one I hadn't realized, the dude involved for the sex for sam stunt DIED within the last few days... AWFUL.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 01, 2003, 04:57:15 AM
My apologies Angelus, I kinda asked for it. But sure, we can get it back to comedy. Dont know how, but it can be done!

Man, I can barely see Chelsea with long flaps of flesh that were once breasts, much less a B or C cup. What was she before the implants? And are there any pics of her then?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on October 01, 2003, 05:06:19 AM
Quote:

My apologies Angelus, I kinda asked for it. But sure, we can get it back to comedy. Dont know how, but it can be done!

Man, I can barely see Chelsea with long flaps of flesh that were once breasts, much less a B or C cup. What was she before the implants? And are there any pics of her then?  




There's one B&W pic floating around saying it's Chelsea before her implants.  Of course the pic is false and thus no REAL pictures of Chelsea before her inflation exsist on the net(as far as anyone knows).

I remember hearing the Chelsea was originally a D-cup before getting into the dancing world.


And I highly doubt after reduction, Chelsea would have long flaps of deflated skin.  Obviously they'd do like a normal reduction and cut off the excess skin so she would have a normal breast.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 01, 2003, 05:11:05 AM
Sorry about that. Kinda didnt know. But now I know. And knowing, is half the battle.
GI JOE! THE REAL AMERICAN HERO!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Angelus on October 01, 2003, 05:13:15 AM
Quote:

Sorry about that. Kinda didnt know. But now I know. And knowing, is half the battle.
GI JOE! THE REAL AMERICAN HERO!  




Quit stealing my jokes.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 01, 2003, 05:32:13 AM
Yes sir. Sorry sir.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on October 01, 2003, 05:56:08 AM
What, no saluting?

And is someone bitter/up past their bedtime?
*winks at Angelus*
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 01, 2003, 06:19:57 AM
Yes maam. Sorry maam. Wont let it happen again maam. Please dont hurt me maam.
*Salutes*
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: AZWolf on October 01, 2003, 06:35:53 AM
I lived in New Jersey for 26 years, I can take some pain.

She can hurt me.  A little.  
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on October 01, 2003, 07:22:42 AM
Quote:

 There's one B&W pic floating around saying it's Chelsea before her implants.  Of course the pic is false and thus no REAL pictures of Chelsea before her inflation exsist on the net(as far as anyone knows).

   




Does this help?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on October 01, 2003, 07:27:56 AM
Kinda.

That pic is of Chelsea with the implants she had right before the string.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on October 01, 2003, 10:47:24 AM
Hmmm...just me, but I think she looked pretty damn good in the pic Sadistyk just posted.

Thanks, fellow Metal Head!


 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on October 01, 2003, 02:11:07 PM
No problem!  Here's another.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: geoffk on October 01, 2003, 03:01:35 PM
Quote:

 
I think you may be wrong about this.  Kayla Kleevage and Sable had their string implants removed.  




That's right, I did forget about those two.  My guess is that they had to remove quite a bit of natural breast tissue along with the string though.  That wasn't a problem, since they were stuffing in a new implant anyway, but if she wanted to go back to a "natural" size, she might still need a small implant or other some kind of reconstruction in order to look good.

Oh, and sorry if I got too serious/clinical.  I actually find the idea of *growing* breasts that can't be removed and can barely be reduced to be quite sexy.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 01, 2003, 04:30:09 PM
Well, in a way, sure. But thats in a fictional story. I mean, real life, thinking it may hurt her, it kinda loses the effect.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on October 01, 2003, 04:43:24 PM
Damn, Sadistyk! Thanks!


Sorry guys, I really hate to say this, but...

Chelsea looks good in her previous form. Plus her veins don't show nearly as much!


But, then again, I have my moments when only the largest will do!

Hmmm, perhaps one day they will invent Morphable Tit Implants, that (to a degree and within a certain level of reason) can change size from say a DD to a HHH, or a HHH to Chelsea's current size.

Bare in mind, I'm no scientist or engineer, so I have no fucking clue how to make that work, but is there anyone else here that desires different sized breasts at different times?

Say, a DD-cup on Monday, a HHH-cup on Tuesday, a JJ-cup on Wednesday, EE-cup on Thursday, and then a ZZZ-cup on Friday?

For the weekend, anything goes!

Just a thought...what can I say, sometimes I want blondes while other times I want only brunettes.


I love a big breasted women, and would treat them all nice.

But for me, being in my soon-to-be mid-twenties, being with one woman is like listening to the same Metallica song day in, day out.

...I'll settle down one day...one day...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 01, 2003, 09:39:41 PM
Quote:

 I actually find the idea of *growing* breasts that can't be removed and can barely be reduced to be quite sexy.
   




The idea is sexy... but what about the reality of it? I can't presume to know, but when I look at the more recent photos of Chelsea it seems she must be reaching some kind of point of no return. Everyone getting off on her, and her making all the money she can possibly make while the making's good is fine and dandy for everybody concerned. But getting off on the idea that Chelsea may actually be faced with a, shall we say, "situation" from which she may have some real difficulty dealing with (i.e. the inevitable removal of the string, and portions of tissue, and the radical reconstructive skin tuck, etc) is another thing again. I mentioned in another thread today that I sometimes have to "look away" when faced with her more graphic shots where the breasts are almost painfully huge and misshapen and the veins are shockingly thick etc. - for me that's where the erotica starts to spill over into the horror genre. And if it were just some special effects (I know, it IS!) and not flesh and blood that would be one thing, but knowing it's a living breathing real estate agent.... is it just me or is there cause to be concerned? It's her "business" of course, but is there a limit?

Got string?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveZ on October 02, 2003, 12:04:52 AM
Well, TKowalski, while everything you say is probably true and you are to be commended for your compassion, I think "Chelsea" will be the ultimate judge as to when Chelsea Charms has had enough.  She is, presumably, aware of the risks.  Therefore, I say "enjoy!" and do so while you can, for such a thing as Chelsea Charms is not meant to last forever.

Steve Z
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 02, 2003, 12:40:25 AM
Quote:

Well, TKowalski, while everything you say is probably true and you are to be commended for your compassion, I think "Chelsea" will be the ultimate judge as to when Chelsea Charms has had enough.  She is, presumably, aware of the risks.  Therefore, I say "enjoy!" and do so while you can, for such a thing as Chelsea Charms is not meant to last forever.




Sure.

"cause for concern" is stretching it a little...  like I said, that's her business, in more ways than one.

But this idea of her expanding "against her will", and now talk of how sexy the idea is that maybe she might be unable to remove the string implant when the time comes, I can practically hear guys twirling their sinister handlebar moustaches and chuckling to themselves. Myself included, I must confess. And since we're talking about a real estate agent, as I said... I guess I get a little misty is all.

As you were, gentlemen. (and ladies)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on October 02, 2003, 12:42:32 AM
 
Quote:

 But this idea of her expanding "against her will", and now talk of how sexy the idea is that maybe she might be unable to remove the string implant, I can practically here guys twirling their sinister handlebar moustaches and chuckling to themselves. Myself included, I must confess. And since we're talking about a real estate agent, as I said... I guess I get a little misty is all.
 




So...you're confessing to having a handlebar moustache ?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 02, 2003, 01:02:00 AM
figurtively, in my dreams, yes... I have a handlebar moustach

and a stove pipe hat
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 02, 2003, 03:41:48 AM
heres a comparison: chelsea wearing her tan suade looking tube top and pants, when she first had the implants (not expanded), to near present times in the same outfit, that she barely fits now.  looks like she has grown double-time.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 02, 2003, 03:42:22 AM
now:
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 02, 2003, 04:09:38 AM
Come to think of it, her smiles arent so... cheerful nowadays. I mean, she looks almost happy in that first pic. In this newer one, she looks like someone is telling her to do it.

Could this tie into it?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on October 02, 2003, 04:58:51 AM
Quote:

figurtively, in my dreams, yes... I have a handlebar moustach

and a stove pipe hat  





Hmmm....I see...  Stove pipe hat eh?


My god!


SNIDLEY WHIPLASH! *Insert sinister piano music here*
 
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on October 02, 2003, 05:04:50 AM
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 02, 2003, 05:28:00 AM
Hell get that Dudley Do Right yet!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 02, 2003, 06:33:48 PM
Quote:

Hell get that Dudley Do Right yet!  




exactly
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rev_Monsoon on October 03, 2003, 03:46:35 PM
Can I we get this interview or is it some kind of "Members' Only" deal?
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rafe on October 03, 2003, 07:59:50 PM
Quote:

to be honest it can also be a really erogenous feeling to wake up the next morning after **94** margaritas all night and find that your boobs have managed to fill up with about 1/2 of those margaritas (due to fluid retention from the salt).  However, this can be a 'pain' too, because once the breast skin has been stretched by the fluid retention, your boobs doesn't shrink back down when the rest of your body gets rid of the salt induced fluid retention !  




Oh. My. God.

Pardon me, I need a moment here. . . .  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: VonKarl on October 04, 2003, 12:40:29 AM
Quote:

I can confirm that it is indeed a somewhat weird feeling to know that your breasts have a 'mind of their own'.  But to be honest it can also be a really erogenous feeling to wake up the next morning after **94** margaritas all night and find that your boobs have managed to fill up with about 1/2 of those margaritas (due to fluid retention from the salt).  However, this can be a 'pain' too, because once the breast skin has been stretched by the fluid retention, your boobs doesn't shrink back down when the rest of your body gets rid of the salt induced fluid retention !  




That must put a real dent in the pocketbook when you have to get new bra's and outfits after a couple of nights!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: skijumper on October 05, 2003, 02:05:29 AM
Quote:


The idea is sexy... but what about the reality of it? I can't presume to know, but when I look at the more recent photos of Chelsea it seems she must be reaching some kind of point of no return. Everyone getting off on her, and her making all the money she can possibly make while the making's good is fine and dandy for everybody concerned. But getting off on the idea that Chelsea may actually be faced with a, shall we say, "situation" from which she may have some real difficulty dealing with




Seeing how big she is already, other than lack of mobility or discomfort, what's to stop her continuing to grow? She's probably already gone a long way past the embarrassment barrier, or worries about notoriety or what people might think of her, or not fitting into normal clothes any more. Work isn't a problem in her case.
She might already be too big to feel safe driving a car or motorbike, or to feel comfortable going out alone to do some "anonymous" shopping in the local mall.

So maybe how much further she goes might depend on what leisure activities she likes, how she likes to socialise, and how long she expects to be "big". Some people really like going for long walks in the country or travel, or driving. Others would be very happy living in a single room or suite if it was big and plush and had a nice facilities tv and room service and phone and internet and friends visiting.  

If she was seriously thinking of a major reduction any time soon (with major surgery), the logical thing would probably be to strike lots of last-minute video and picture deals, and then go all-out for maximum size, knowing that you had an escape route already planned and that if further growth left you immobilised, it would only be temporary.

So since she's trying to slow and regulate her growth, maybe that's encouraging, maybe it means that she's intending to stay as big as she is for quite a while, and hopes to to keep her figure this side of "managable" for as long as possible.
 
Like everyone else here, I hope she's getting a decent income from what she's doing, and that its piling up nicely in the bank, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on October 05, 2003, 02:11:19 AM
Quote:

Come to think of it, her smiles arent so... cheerful nowadays. I mean, she looks almost happy in that first pic. In this newer one, she looks like someone is telling her to do it.

Could this tie into it?  




Well, I think that last photo was taken during the time she was really sick(it was mentioned in her newsletter).  She apprently had a major inner ear infection going on when she did one of her photoclubs sets.  It apparently was very very bad.  To the point where she was actually bleeding from her ear.

So that may explain why her smile looks a little "forced".  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 05, 2003, 04:29:36 AM
Ah, I see. It makes sense now. Thanks.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 05, 2003, 10:07:18 PM
The string had worked (wormed) its way all the way up into her inner ear. Eiww.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on October 05, 2003, 10:17:25 PM
And wraps itself around the cerebral cortex, rendering the individual extremely susceptible to suggestion. Then follows madness...and death.

At least that's what Khan told me!    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Angelus on October 07, 2003, 12:53:53 AM
Because this thread got me thinking, I started something on the Addventure...

http://www.bearchive.com/~addventure/game1/docs/042/42592.html  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: EgregiousSamuel on October 09, 2003, 08:37:07 AM
Call it, folks.  You know the vein I am talking about.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on October 09, 2003, 09:03:07 AM
Maybe that should be vein(s)?

Not into veins in boobs generally, but if it's part of Chelsea I like it!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on October 09, 2003, 09:34:28 AM
Deja vu!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on October 09, 2003, 09:47:07 AM
We've had this conversation before. If you run a search you will see it was quite a hot topic at the time.

For the record, I think Chelsea is just fabulous.

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on October 09, 2003, 03:10:12 PM
Gotta say that I wish the veins weren't there, but it does not distract me from the awe of massive breast flesh.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on October 09, 2003, 07:22:55 PM
I am glad the veins are there, that visible and prominent!  I would be disturbed if they weren't there!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Panzuriel on October 09, 2003, 09:45:15 PM
I personally find the vein sorta disturbing.  I am not sure why.  I even dislike seeing blue veins that are not bulging beneth normal size breasts.  I really can't put a finger on it, but I think that it may be related to the fact that I don't like seeing veins anywhere.  Anyhoo, I just thought I'd add my 2 cents for not attractive.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on October 09, 2003, 10:07:34 PM
Nothing about Chelsea is rupulsive...gorgeous inside and out.

-Dick (and Jane would agree)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sonic_Morph on October 09, 2003, 10:29:38 PM
I think the vein adds to the total package along with the size and shape of her breasts, positioning of her nipples etc.

Her breasts do look weird (veins and all) but i think thats where the attraction lies for me......cant get enough of her smile too.

Sonic.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DrHyde on October 10, 2003, 12:05:34 AM
Who's your avatar Sonic_Morph?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JewFunk on October 10, 2003, 12:10:03 AM
I prefer Chelsea's breasts clothed. I love their sheer mass but they're just too lopsided, lumpy and odd looking for me.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 10, 2003, 12:29:46 AM
I too would love to see new clothed pics. But I really dont pay much attention to it. Im just at awe at how large they are.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveZ on October 10, 2003, 03:31:40 AM
Erotic or repulsive?  I vote for erotic AND repulsive!

Seriously, I think Chelsea is a beautiful woman with a beautiful body, but I mainly like her for the "freak show" factor, and the "grotesque" veins are just a part of that for me.

Steve Z
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Brabuster67 on October 10, 2003, 04:06:20 AM
I have to say first off that chelsea is awesome, the best fantasy fuel that I have ever enjoyed - consumed by me almost daily for 3 years.

As to her tits I prefer them covered - tight tops vests etc.  Even more erotic is the "covered'n'bare" look where there are pics side by side; one with top on and the other with top off.

As to the vein in particular, I made a post on the subject some time ago and it met with mostly sarcastic replies.  Basically it exists because of her hugeness and fakeness and must therefore be worshipped along with the rest of her mamoth tits.

It is my guess that none of us huge tits hounds will ever again in our lives come off to the likes of Chelsea.  Yes huge tit chics will come and go and we will of course love them and fantasize over them, but I bet there will never be an equal to Chelsea - so enjoy life and huge tits when you can.
BB  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DDDyson on October 10, 2003, 04:56:25 AM
Chelsea's insane growth has crossed some kind of a line in my brain. When I stare at her assets, I just don't ... recognize them as breasts any more. I just squint and tilt my head and while my rational brain tells me, "Yes, those are her breasts", my lizard brain just goes "WTF?".

I find her a bit disturbing, yes. But I've noticed my tastes going for bigger and bigger boobs through time. I guess I'm just not, er, "seasoned" enough?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on October 10, 2003, 06:11:04 AM
Even though CC's vein is not repulsive to me it has made me appreciate Keihsa's perfectly smooth, white breasts that much more!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 10, 2003, 06:15:24 AM
My vote is on clothed. I dont know why. Maybe its seeing the struggle the clothes have to deal with to cover those up. Specially now.

Man, theyre immense!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on October 10, 2003, 07:29:40 AM
I personally don't care for the veins in women's breasts...kinda spoils the mood.

But if she as a whole is stunning, I can over look one flaw.


Hell, some people have MANY flaws...I know I do! I try not to judge women too harshly.

Overall, Chelsea is awesome...as long as it's HER face I see and not Munch Wolf's!!!


Heavy "Please, PregNut, STOP IT!! AAAAARRRRGGGHHH!!!!" Metal

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SAMU on October 10, 2003, 07:45:56 AM
I just love that vein. I can fantasize about stroking my hand up her huge breast and then along the bulgjng moment of softness as I encounter that vein. I follow it over the contouring roundness until it dives down into the depths of her body. Then I imagine my hands going back to where I started to caress those engenering wonders again. I feel the soft smoothness of the skin that is on the surface then I feel the ruggedness and peculiarly sexual artificial firmness of what's under the skin.
I dunno, I guess I like texture sometimes.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SoylentOrange on October 10, 2003, 08:02:13 AM
Veins schmeins, just make 'em bigger!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on October 10, 2003, 08:09:39 AM
Hey, I can deal with the 'vein'.  It's really not that big of a deal.  Some like it, some don't.  That's just how the world works.

Still, if I was single I wouldn't kick her out of bed unless she wanted to go at it on the floor.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DrHyde on October 10, 2003, 08:22:17 AM
Personally, I hate the vein....it grosses me out. I agree though that I'd like to see more clothed pics. Also, don't you think its a little weird for her with clothes. I mean, she has these gigantic boobs and then she has the fluid drained and then none of her clothes fit properly anymore. Then, a few months go by and her breasts grow bigger than they were before and she's ripping out of her clothes. So, she has to go get the fluid drained again. Its a vicious cycle that repeats itself....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: kupsyza on October 10, 2003, 08:23:31 AM
thumbs down...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ample1 on October 10, 2003, 08:28:48 AM
ahh I like em  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BiBoob on October 10, 2003, 01:16:05 PM
It's a part of Chelsea's breasts. I like her and her boobs, so i like the veins.

BiBoob  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: maybeenuf4u on October 10, 2003, 04:59:54 PM
I find it erotic. I guess it kind of reminds me that her breasts are real. And so huge. I mean that vein alone must be about as long as my leg!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gOOber on October 10, 2003, 05:06:26 PM
  In a jocular vein, I like it.  

     
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on October 10, 2003, 06:10:48 PM
I simply adore the woman, veins and all. The bigger she gets, the better it gets.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 10, 2003, 07:01:51 PM
It's gnarly and gnarled, and the freakshow factor is a factor.
The "breasts" are so exagerrated, dwarfing her, they sometimes look like they would love nothing more than to sneak off in the night and leave her behind and embark on a career of their own.

"ONE NIGHT ONLY! CHELSEA'S BREASTS!"

Look on the bright side fellas, at least she doesn't have rivets and drainspouts.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on October 10, 2003, 08:16:57 PM
There is no denying that Chelsea is a triumph in BEA world.  No one can compare because she has one thing that non of the others have - she is CUTE!  Maxi may be just as big, but hey, I'm sorry but she is just nasty looking.  Chelsea may have the vein, but she has everything else for a complete package!    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on October 10, 2003, 09:12:40 PM
Dude, Maxi is not "Nasty Looking."  I believe she posts here, so please, if you feel this way, keep it to yourself.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Wholeman on October 11, 2003, 03:36:13 AM
I like the veins!  Then I know they aren't foam fakes...
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GHOST9 on October 11, 2003, 03:46:03 PM
I'm actually a big fan of clothed tits in tight tops and this is how I really prefer Chelsea because she looks great in them but I must admit that cosmetically her breast are not the greatest looking but no one can stretch out a pair shoulder straps like Chelsea can.



...............*ghost out*  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RenegadeUK on October 11, 2003, 03:51:00 PM
I am with you there, Ghost9, above a certain size huge mammories just look better, more provoctative and downright alluring covered up....Gimme Chelsea with an overstretched jumper on anyday....well actually, just give me Chelsea
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: tina83 on October 11, 2003, 09:27:41 PM
I've never seen anything repulsive about Chelsea. She is definitely the total package.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Maxi_Mounds on October 12, 2003, 12:41:41 AM
Thanks for defending me but comments from idiots are quite common for me, so I just consider the source and keep smiling...  :-)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on October 12, 2003, 01:05:50 AM
While there is no shortage of people here who would rush to your defence Maxi, those of us who know you, know you are a strong and capable woman who is unlikely to be perturbed by a little mudslinging from the cheap seats.

Maxi, you are the bomb and seem to be getting ever more gorgeous each time I see you. Here's hoping you make it to the AVN in January.

Keep on trucking (I've always wondered what that means )  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on October 12, 2003, 02:36:10 AM
I should have ignored the comment Maxi.  You are an amazing beauty, and to say otherwise is simply ludicrous.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jaytas on October 12, 2003, 03:07:31 AM
Hmmm. I suppose that the day of the true gentleman is now gone and filed away in the archives of history. I am thinking that a true gentleman would not say unkind thinks about a lady, even if he thought them. Maybe I am wrong. Maybe after all I am not a gentleman after all if this is not true. I hail from an era that is the joining point of "the time when women were shall we say held in high esteem as in more like delicate **02**" and "women being just another bloke but with different organs".

So while I know that women are people, obviously so, I still have the olden day habits of curbing my tongue, until such a time as the woman herself begins to speak like a wharf worker. (No offence meant to wharf workers of course, for those of you that are wharf workers substitute some other profession please.heh).

An example of a delicate **02** is attached. The face mon the face, is what I am alluding to, not the rest. Although the rest seems delicate too of course.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 12, 2003, 04:39:02 AM
Now that is a very pretty lady. But I feel bad saying that since she looks so young. How old is she?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jaytas on October 12, 2003, 07:10:06 AM
Over 18.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gOOber on October 12, 2003, 01:16:39 PM
   Never underestimate the power of Chelsea`s vein.  

     
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gOOber on October 12, 2003, 01:45:22 PM
   Here it is for closer examination.  

     
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on October 12, 2003, 01:55:50 PM
Some people are  vain.

Chelsea is  vein.

Not the same I guess.

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Wholeman on October 12, 2003, 03:00:30 PM
Maxi
Wow!  I would love to be **101** by the fluttering of your heartbeat in those incredible breasts!
Of course I might go into coronary thrombosis, but it would be well worth the risk!
 

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kowalski on October 12, 2003, 09:58:41 PM
Quote:

   Here it is for closer examination.  

     




Oh MAN... that diagram is, like, SOOOO HOTT!!!!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: EgregiousSamuel on October 12, 2003, 10:44:29 PM
JAYTAS: what's her name?  I'd like to see more of her.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 12, 2003, 11:49:54 PM
The avatar? I really think thats Keisha Evans.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on October 13, 2003, 12:28:17 AM
Quote:

The avatar? I really think thats Keisha Evans.  




I think he was asking who is the girl he posted.  Not who his avatar was.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jaytas on October 13, 2003, 09:36:35 AM
Avatar is Keisha as we should all know by now. The pic? Search me. I pick up a pic here a pic there. heavans knows where I get a lot of my stuff in fact. Heh.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sgskippypbj on October 15, 2003, 03:55:44 AM
Back to the original question ...

I say "erotic"!

I'd love to run my finger up and down and back and forth over it and see if I could feel it pulsating or not.

- sgskippypbj
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HellbillyEcono on October 15, 2003, 05:49:35 AM
I suppose it's kinda nasty but I've seen her in person and dammit, I love it!

However, seeing Chelsea in clothes is what get me going! Seeing those huge thigns stretching out an outfit is totally WILD!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 15, 2003, 06:20:47 AM
Glad Im not alone in that whole "Liking Chelsea In Clothes" thing.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: shaggy on October 15, 2003, 11:52:06 AM
i like the vein.
it gives her the "ready to burst" look.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BSLFE on October 26, 2003, 04:37:13 AM
Hi fellas,

it may be a question yet answered somewhere here but I am still curious to find out. Can Chelsea Charms have a [censored] with her enourmos bust. I would think since she is so small and her tits "overlay" the most of her torso she might have troubles with it.

What do you guys think? Maybe someone here even spoke to her and asked her?

--BSLFE  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on October 26, 2003, 04:40:14 AM
The only problem I foresee is with breastfeeding.....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 26, 2003, 05:10:55 AM
Im still wondering about her nipples. Come to think of it, I dont recall them being very large, moreso like small bumps (I would guess from all the growth) so the problem would be in the [censored] latching onto the breast.

One things for sure, it would be one amazing sight. During and after the pregnancy.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HarbleWom on October 26, 2003, 05:24:21 AM
You bring up an excellent point, McKormick. Let's see. If Chelsea's bust is currently [X], and pregnant women typically increase by [Y]%, then she'd be an astounding [Z]!

(Anybody care to help me fill in the variables?  )  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on October 26, 2003, 05:25:53 AM
If a woman gains 20lbs. during pregnancy about 2lbs. or 10% would be in the breasts. This varies of course, but the string implants present a very different picture.
Assuming CC was fertile to start with - pregnancy wouldn't be affected by the string implants.  The problem would be in the hormonal changes that play havoc with electrolytes and fluid retention.  This might cause a massive amount of fluid building around the implanted polypropylene material and rapid breast expansion.

I appeal to Melonie for more definitive information (as always).  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ValorPhoenix on October 26, 2003, 05:38:48 AM
I was thinking the same thing as Catch. If she's near the limit her skin can take with the string, then something like a pergnancy might put her in danger of rupturing. The actuall belly likely couldn't be affected, it's fairly firm.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 26, 2003, 06:17:33 AM
Well I was thinking, yes, the breast expansion. It would boggle the mind. But shed end up being huge all around probably. Or her breasts would dwarf her belly altogether.

Didnt want to push the subject of that whole "Can Take No More" thing. Kinda takes the fun out of it.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DDDyson on October 26, 2003, 06:37:26 AM
Frankly, I'm scared to think about it.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on October 26, 2003, 07:02:00 AM
Quote:

You bring up an excellent point, McKormick. Let's see. If Chelsea's bust is currently [X], and pregnant women typically increase by [Y]%, then she'd be an astounding [Z]!

(Anybody care to help me fill in the variables?  )  




Come on, since probably 80 to 90% of her bust size is artifical, it's not reasonable to assume that there would be an overall increase in her bust size along the lines of the percentage one might expect from an woman w/o implants. Whatever minority percentage of CC's boobs is actually made of CC, THAT part might swell with hormonal activity/milk production, but the implants themselves aren't likely to magically expand too.

Many women carry their babies somewhat 'low'... even if she didn't I don't think that CC's oversized implants would present a physical impediment to her swollen belly. I don't know if the implants themselves are likely to interfere with breast feeding (which is not necessary for having a baby of course)... I'd suspect that with implants the size of hers, the ductwork in her breasts is likely to not function as effectively as it would if she didn't have such huge implants, or any implants at all.

JMHO.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ValorPhoenix on October 26, 2003, 08:11:45 AM
Size really doesn't matter, otherwise the more rotund women would have major birth problems related to such pressures and forces.

There are only 2 implant related concerns that I can imagine.

Breastfeeding: impaired or not at all.

String Implants: Since they're based on the hydrostatic pressure of the sebacious fluid instead of the string, something as serious as a pregnancy could radically change their size, perhaps more than the skin can take. Non-augmented women already get enough growth to have 'tender and swollen' breasts.

I don't really follow the porn business, but from reading the forums here the past few days, I thought C Charms was the one with the string implants that had to watch her fluid/salt intake since her skin was at her limits.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on October 26, 2003, 09:35:02 AM
You guys have read too much into my statement....

Quote:

The only problem I forsee is in breastfeeding




The other side of the coin is that if she is able to lactate and breastfeed, she'd need another person to hold the baby as there is no way she'd be able to support the baby's head enough for it to latch on, even at her current size. Another note, growth doesn't have to occur in order to lactate. Some women experience an increase of up to four cup sizes (regardless of overall weight gain) while others experience none (save darkening of the areola and extension of the nipple).  In either case, they can potentially produce the same amount of milk.

I do think that the properties of "string" were even under estimated by the technique's inventor. So who knows?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on October 26, 2003, 10:16:46 AM
Palomine:
Your reference to implants is true only with encapsulated ones like saline or silicone. Chelsea has the "string implants".  Altogether different.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on October 26, 2003, 02:29:01 PM
Hi,

I think her breasts are still supported by her ribcage.
The breast weight can't considered as dangerous for a baby.
For example Isabelle Lanthier got her reduction after giving birth.

People, wait and see what happens if it happens ;-).

Bye,
andrat2000  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 26, 2003, 03:35:54 PM
Yeah, but werent Isabelles milk filled to begin with? I dont think she really counts in this circumstance.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on October 26, 2003, 05:39:43 PM
Yes Catch... even tho I'm not a major Chelsea fan I do know that she has string implants. Regardless of the media involved, the fact would seem that WHATEVER material it is that's been inserted into her breasts, a WHOLE LOT of it has been stuffed inside to the point of distension. And I'm going to assume (though I might be wrong) that the material is located above/in front of her pectoral muscles as I don't imagine that they'd stretch to accomodate such huge items behind. Thus, the duct structure we always see in cut-away diagrams of breasts can only be under extreeme compression, as it probably been forced forward into a very small area (if viewed in profile). The xray images of Lolo Ferrari's breasts spring to mind (yes I know that hers weren't string implants)... what remained of original tissue appeared very minimal in terms of thickness... like a sheet of plastic wrap covering an orange in a sense.

Though CC's string implants are of course different in nature than saline/silicone bags, they obviously are huge in volume, thus my supposition that the ductwork might be affected. I'm not saying that she couldn't possibly nurse a baby at all (I have no idea of course, and she herself might not either) but only that her ability to nurse could be affected. This is the standard disclaimer given to women with MUCH smaller standard implants from what I understand.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on October 26, 2003, 06:42:24 PM
On the subject of string implants and pregnancy, you are correct that the size of string implants being extremely sensitive to "fluid balance" can cause extremely unpredictable results in string implant size.  I was warned that getting pregnant with string implants still in place represented a major risk of complications.  It seems that there was more than one case of girls with string implants who had gotten pregnant suddenly having their breasts begin to grow visibly by the day, to the point where the rapid growth rate overwhelmed the skin's ability to adapt to the stretching such that incisions were pulled apart and the string implants had to be removed.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on October 26, 2003, 06:53:11 PM
Once again Melonie weighs in with an authoritative and informative post.

I know I am gonna take flak for this, but i think this thread is a little near the knuckle. Childbirth and family are always kind of touchy subjects. How would you like someone talking about your girlfriend's potential fertility?

Just my 10c, leave the flamethrower on the shelf.

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ninjrk on October 26, 2003, 08:12:28 PM
Quote:

On the subject of string implants and pregnancy, you are correct that the size of string implants being extremely sensitive to "fluid balance" can cause extremely unpredictable results in string implant size.  I was warned that getting pregnant with string implants still in place represented a major risk of complications.  It seems that there was more than one case of girls with string implants who had gotten pregnant suddenly having their breasts begin to grow visibly by the day, to the point where the rapid growth rate overwhelmed the skin's ability to adapt to the stretching such that incisions were pulled apart and the string implants had to be removed.  




I know of one who was able to keep hers, but the skin actually tore due to the excessive stretching.

Frickin' ouch.

Matt  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DrHyde on October 26, 2003, 08:26:43 PM
Except for the skin tearing part, its sounds like a BE guy's wet dream. I could just imagine some girl's breasts steadily growing and ripping out of her clothes as the day goes on. Stupid genetics not allowing the skin to keep stretching....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on October 27, 2003, 12:05:50 AM
Thanks for the information Mel. You always come through.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on October 27, 2003, 04:00:24 AM
How to tell Chelsea's [censored] from other people's [censored] ...

Stretch marks on the lips.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on October 27, 2003, 04:55:58 AM
LOL!

Great adaptation of a Dolly Parton joke I'd forgotten.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 27, 2003, 05:23:08 AM
Ba dum ching!

Sadistyk is back baby!

And to add some more here...
Quote:

I know I am gonna take flak for this, but i think this thread is a little near the knuckle. Childbirth and family are always kind of touchy subjects. How would you like someone talking about your girlfriend's potential fertility?

Just my 10c, leave the flamethrower on the shelf.

Pixeltiger    



To respond, I guess it is kinda wrong. But its only a discussion and as was already said, its a BE guys wet dream (Or rather, Mausopheliac, if that is a word). But wait, CC has a boyfriend?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Mr Curiosity on October 27, 2003, 11:09:15 PM
I would think that the major problem would be the sheer weight Chelsea would have to carry around, and the (further) strain on her back. I remember reading somewhere (in Score I think) that Wendy Whoppers had her reduction because of this same problem.

However, Sarenna Lee kept her large implants in when she was pregnant, so perhaps it is possible.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 28, 2003, 12:18:41 AM
Weight? I dont think Chelsea has that problem. Probably works out of some such.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on October 28, 2003, 01:37:34 AM
Seems to me that I read that her breasts weigh close to 50 pouns for the pair. Adding in a pregnancy weight gain of the same amount? My God, she's be unable to move out of bed.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on October 28, 2003, 02:31:51 AM
25lbs is the mean weight increase during pregnancy....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on October 28, 2003, 03:03:51 AM
Quote:

Seems to me that I read that her breasts weigh close to 50 pouns for the pair. Adding in a pregnancy weight gain of the same amount? My God, she's be unable to move out of bed.  




Oh come on... don't believe everything you read! Jeez, you ever pick up a 50 pound bag of cement? You think that any woman who didn't look like the Arnold in his "Pumping Iron" prime could possibly walk around at all with 50 pounds hanging from her chest? The skin would stretch and probably tear the first time she went braless for an hour or two. There's NO way that CC's rack, even as hugely implanted as it is, weighs anything even like the quoted ammt.

I wouldn't want to guess (w/o a personal hands-on exam ) but if pressed, I'd venture that judging by their size, the fact that they're string and not silicone or saline, and by the apparent distension of the skin on and above the breasts... that they might weigh a maximum of 8 to 14 pounds each. Tops. JMHO.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ValorPhoenix on October 28, 2003, 04:19:53 AM
implants are 1 Kilogram (2.2 pounds) per 1000cc so 4.4 or near 5 pounds for the pair per cc. I think that way of guessing will work best for most implant fans here.

(Volume) - (Weight per pair)
1000 cc = 5 pounds
3000 cc = 15 pounds
5000 cc = 25 pounds

Volume of a sphere is 4/3 pi r^3, so 50 pound pair of breasts would be 10,000 cc, which is a radius of 13 cm, diameter perfect sphere of 26 cm or 10 inches across.
5000 cc breasts if perfect spheres would be 8 inches across

That may not seem much, but a 34 inch chest measurement is about 11 inches across.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on October 28, 2003, 04:37:21 AM
Isnt Keishas dream 10,000? She wants 50 pounds of breast? Whoa.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on October 28, 2003, 04:46:18 AM
Not sure about the math... I'll have to take your word for it, but I imagine that the much more common silicone/saline is quite a bit heavier than string (which I'm not sure what it's made of, but I imagine some kind of surgical nylon or polypropelene or something similar). Thus, no math will convince me that each one of Chelsea's boobs weighs 25 pounds. Pick up a 25 pound plate from a benchpress and then imagine two of those hanging from your chest wall... I just don't buy it.

I'm not saying CC's boobs aren't heavy... I'm sure they are! Judging by her pix and the one video that I have of her, they are putting a major strain on her skin... no question. But saying that she's got 50 pounds of breasts is like all those ads billing various big bust models as having "ZZZZZ cup" bosoms.... just exaggeration IMHO.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ValorPhoenix on October 28, 2003, 05:51:58 AM
Saline and water have a density of 1g/cc hence one kg / 1000 cc
Polystyrene would have a lower density, based on the string to fluid ratio, plus skin, connective tissues and ductwork.

Good point though, I forgot about the string, so CC would be say 75% mass (guessing on string proportion). All told I'd say she's carrying around 18 pounds there.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on October 28, 2003, 06:01:13 AM
I suppose that 18 lbs is closer to the realm of possibility. Though I think that the string itself has much less than 75% the density of water/silicone, though your point about fluid/tissue/etc... in the area of the sting is a valid one.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on October 28, 2003, 08:02:16 PM
Quote:

I suppose that 18 lbs is closer to the realm of possibility. Though I think that the string itself has much less than 75% the density of water/silicone, though your point about fluid/tissue/etc... in the area of the sting is a valid one.  




Well, as far as I remember the article of Dr. Johnson, the first string implants had a density of 0,9 g/cm³. After some time they changed to string with 1g/cm³.

Bye,
andrat2000  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ValorPhoenix on October 28, 2003, 08:34:10 PM
ahh, I was guessing .75 g/cc

The string itself has a density of like <.01 g/cc.

It's not the string itself that makes for an implant, it's just an irritant. Essentially enough string is put into the cavaity so that it will fill with fluid and still be enough string to brush against the walls, so at .9 g/cc, it's basically 10% string 90% fluids. It basically turns the breasts themselves into saline implants, which is why periodic draining is a must to avoid rupture.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HarbleWom on October 29, 2003, 01:08:30 AM
Speaking of draining, I haven't heard a lot about that. Does anyone know what they do for that? I'm thinking it can't be too complex or costly, because it seems to happen fairly often.

While I'm at it, I think Chelsea is still slowly getting bigger. Every so often she gets drained to avoid bursting. Well, I figure the skin is still growing to accomodate the fluid. So maybe she can go longer without draining each time, or has to drain a little less, and can get a larger maximum capacity. That may explain the recent "holy crap Chelsea is so freaking huge now!" thread.  

Now we just need to figure out a way to get her skin to grow at an extremely rapid rate to keep up with the fluid filling up the breasts so she can get really huge.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ValorPhoenix on October 29, 2003, 03:45:06 AM
I think it's just done with a syringe.

Well, the crux of the peoblem is, the fluid can fill in very rapidly, an average person can gain or lose several pounds a week in just water retention(Weekend diets tend to get rid of just water). I believe Chelsea monitors her salt intake to keep down water retention.

(science)
The fluids in your body are based on salt water(Electrolytes). Water lowers the salt concentration level, hence creatures need to intake salt to keep the balance. Salt Water is too salty, so it actually in essence draws water from the blood.(actually it makes the blood too salty and in need of pure water to reach balance).
(/science)

So only a little fluid can be drained at a time, otherwise she would likely get saggy and dehydrated. Also string will continue to cause fluid expansion only until the string itself gets gunked over by bodily reaction. I have no clue how long that will take, if it happens at all.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HarbleWom on October 29, 2003, 04:00:39 AM
Oh yeah, osmosis and all of that (I can't remember the name of the term for the one that isn't water passing between cells... this is going to bug me). Yeah, I heard about how she has to watch what she eats.

So how often do these drainings occur? And is it a lot at a time or just a bit?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Slice on October 29, 2003, 09:59:14 AM
Hi, I'm a Chelsea fan based in the UK, I was wondering whether there are any European based female Chelsea fans? Well to be fair I wanted to know how many female fans she has??? I think its time for the next Chelsea to be unearthed! with the exception of the lovely Miss Evans the scene is a bit flat at the moment (no pun intended!) Are there any European girls interested in following in Chelsea's footsteps as it seems logical, given the fact that its probably easier to get huge implants in France than in the States! Oh does anyone know whether Harmony Bliss, Crystal Gunns, Vixen et al ever plan on supersizing???  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: J_Panda on October 29, 2003, 01:15:44 PM
probably not the world never works the way you want it. having someone like chelsea close to home is but a fleeting dream but we live in hope  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on October 29, 2003, 02:41:53 PM
Nice to know that there is even a female Chelsea Charms fan in the UK. Sadly I do not think we will see many following in  her footsteps in Europe.

Thank heavens for Keisha

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on October 29, 2003, 10:10:09 PM
Quote:

Sadly I do not think we will see many following in  her footsteps in Europe.





Yes, that's strange. We have the big implants here in Europe, but nearly none of the ladies wants to go super sizing. The only supersized that I can remember is/was Lolo Ferrari. There are some with big implants (Ashley Bond) but none in the category >= 3000ccm.

Bye,
andrat2000  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: J_Panda on November 05, 2003, 07:23:28 PM
also if your from gb you know how they go on about jordan having twin air bags i can't think what tehy would do if they saw someone the size of chelsea  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: innocence on November 06, 2003, 04:55:18 PM
Hi I'm from Germany. I think the american girls have not problems with: I go to the surgeon and make my breast big, Oh all the people look at me.

Europeans or Germans are more conserative.

Look at girls like Lolo, Tina Angel or Julia Miles. They go from talkshow to talkshow and all the people say: What the hell is she! What a freak!

I hope the next generation of german girls think a little bit other of these. Cause here it is legal to put in really big implants.

Perhaps in the future the Busty stars are from Germany or Europe ???

Nice Idea


Sorry for my Englisch  

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Slice on November 06, 2003, 06:14:16 PM
Hey - thanx for the posts guys! was getting concerned I had a bad name! no replies! Any how, yeah, as there arent any restrictions in Germany (and you can get the massive >3000cc implants from France) there must be some girls out there tempted to get HUGE! I mean you get strip clubs out there right? I was under the impression Europe (mainland) and Germany in particular were quite open with regard to sex so it seems logical there would be the market at least for big bust films etc... SO where are you European girls who want Huge implants!!! Also, I thought busty girls were quite sought after in Germany? just the impression I had? Not in the UK since Jordan et al get panned in the press for being HUGE! what would the papers do if they saw Chelsea!!! lol Are there many strip clubs in Germany? Perhaps someone could set up multi-lingual sites aimed at parts of europe so that we can increase the exposure of the Super-sized girls in Europe so hope to get more female fans and hence more chance of girls wanting to copy them. Does any one know what happened to the two girls who got implants when Lolo was around before she departed? perhaps they might be in for going bigger?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on November 06, 2003, 09:37:35 PM
Yes, there are at least two MAJOR differences between having huge boobs in Europe and having huge boobs in the USA.  As Innocence posted, the first is the conservativism of European society on some issues and liberalism on other issues.  This means that a European girl with breasts larger than DD cups would constantly be subject to ridicule in her everyday life, and a girl with a cup size in the second half of the alphabet would be considered a plastic freak.

On the flip side, with the glaring exception of the UK, the greater tolerance for sex in European society means that instead of having US style "feature clubs" where a huge busted girl can perform a stage show, the vast majority of European clubs offer "sex shows" on stage and sex with customers in one form or another - meaning that any huge busted girl wishing to work in these clubs would be expected to do likewise.  A small percentage of European clubs offer extremely beautiful and talented "hostesses", but these clubs would undoubtedly not consider a huge busted girl as beautiful enough under any circumstances (i.e. don't want a freak show).  Bottom line is that if a girl must offer sex in order to be financially successful in European clubs, why bother to invest tens of thousands of Euros in huge custom made breast implants when you could earn virtually the same amount without them ?

Only the UK seems to have a club scene anywhere near the US model, and unfortunately these clubs don't seem to be interested in paid feature performances.  I have tried to put together a UK "working vacation" in the past, but met with almost total disinterest on the part of agents and clubowners. There are simply too few fans and too few willing clubs to support a big bust feature business in the UK.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: lechacal on November 07, 2003, 10:22:55 AM
Quote:

Yes, there are at least two MAJOR differences between having huge boobs in Europe and having huge boobs in the USA.  As Innocence posted, the first is the conservativism of European society on some issues and liberalism on other issues.  This means that a European girl with breasts larger than DD cups would constantly be subject to ridicule in her everyday life, and a girl with a cup size in the second half of the alphabet would be considered a plastic freak.

On the flip side, with the glaring exception of the UK, the greater tolerance for sex in European society means that instead of having US style "feature clubs" where a huge busted girl can perform a stage show, the vast majority of European clubs offer "sex shows" on stage and sex with customers in one form or another - meaning that any huge busted girl wishing to work in these clubs would be expected to do likewise.  A small percentage of European clubs offer extremely beautiful and talented "hostesses", but these clubs would undoubtedly not consider a huge busted girl as beautiful enough under any circumstances (i.e. don't want a freak show).  Bottom line is that if a girl must offer sex in order to be financially successful in European clubs, why bother to invest tens of thousands of Euros in huge custom made breast implants when you could earn virtually the same amount without them ?

Only the UK seems to have a club scene anywhere near the US model, and unfortunately these clubs don't seem to be interested in paid feature performances.  I have tried to put together a UK "working vacation" in the past, but met with almost total disinterest on the part of agents and clubowners. There are simply too few fans and too few willing clubs to support a big bust feature business in the UK.



Hi Melonie,
im from switzerland (big fan of yours and other big breasts models for years) and agree with almost all what you said, it s true in europe we havent these kind of strip clubs like in the US, we only have night dancing clubs or cabarets with escort(poor exploited girls), but i think a lot of europeans would love to have big bust features, i saw once Lolo Ferrari  when she was touring in clubs (discotheques), the clubs were full, with people just coming for her (it was a bit of hysteria with all people who wanted to touch her tits), she appeared on tv shows and when she died the main channels talked about her on the news...Most people as u said say these girls are freak but a lot of guys secretly like it and i m sure you would have success here and a lot of europeans are waiting to see you one day ...well it eas just a view from a european fan...
keep up the gret work mel
see u maybe one day...
tony  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on November 08, 2003, 12:42:29 PM
Lol. Off course there is good interest from europe in crazyly enhanced boobs. That's why chelsea's photoclub had to make an international billing optinon available...

I showed her pics to some Dutch friends. lol. recation was kinda positive. lol.... they just asked:' isnt that a bBIT exaggerated?.' lol. but they could understand I admire her because she comes close to my artwork. lol.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Brabuster67 on November 10, 2003, 06:42:01 AM
Hi there.  Well I for one am a huge fake tit addict.  It is so sad that there are precious few huge fake tits in the UK.  The dudes in the States are so lucky - I would so love to see the "girl next door" in her every day gear with those massive tits hidden underneath.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Brabuster67 on November 10, 2003, 10:43:36 AM
Hey you are by no means not alone. I dig chelsea - the hottest of the hot.  If you wanna hook up for chelsea talk or pic trade then look me up at bigsiliconebreasts@yahoo.co.uk  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on November 11, 2003, 10:16:09 PM
... to the members section. And you can join her webpage now for $ 9.95 a month. This are good news, indeed.

Bye,
andrat2000  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Paladin on November 11, 2003, 10:25:21 PM
It's about time, too.  Too many jerk-offs posting nonsense on that board.  So when legit issues were raised, CC would never come around to answer them.  The fact that she is doing some serious revamping of her site (not to mention the reduction of price per month) tells me that she actually has been listening to legit gripes of her fans who felt as if she was taking advantage of them.  Some positive steps being taken by Ms. Charms.  Hope it continues.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Traxellus on November 19, 2003, 05:27:37 PM
Hope that all of you are doing well today...

It's a shame about Chelsea's messageboard becoming part of the paysite now.  Unfortunately, I can't join her site (although I really really want to, and my birthday is coming soon, and maybe I can get to see it for a day, and maybe the Winnipeg Jets will play the Quebec Nordiques, and maybe...well never mind), so I enjoyed reading the intelligent posts on her board (there were a few).  It's a shame that a small minority of dimwits sullied the board enough that now us good ol' regualar folk can't read the posts.  Once in a while, even Chelsea herself posted a message.  It was nice to read the object of our affection responding to the few serious queries that were posted.  So, thanks for nothing to all you morons.

I wonder then, if other models have gone through the same experiences?  More idiots than gentlemen posting to the point that enough is enough and it's the only way to preserve their sanity.  God, how many times did Chelsea have to read messages saying "I want to !@#$ you" or messages denouncing her and the life she has chose.  Yes, it's free speech, but come on now.

Personally I would post a message (or send an e-mail) asking her about things that mattered.  Things that we could not see.  We all know what she looks like. but what about how she feels about things?  That's just me, and I'm sure that others feel the same way.  

I have also read on here that it appears that Chelsea is not enjoying herself as much as she used to.  Is that really shocking?  With people trashing her on her own website, the fatigue from constant travel, and the exhaustion from having your time and attention in constant demand.  Yes, I know that she chose this line of work, and she seems smart enough to know the perils that come with it, but still.

Perhaps Chelsea could do a bit more for her fans (better videos, more updates?), but why go to the trouble if for the most part all she's going to hear are insults?  Maybe it's a catch-22: can't do better because of the hardship, but the hardship is because you can't do better.

What was my main point again...right, the messageboard.  It simply sucks that it had to be taken away (if I could get a membership, then my rant would be moot), but maybe it's a microcosm (just had to throw that word in) of a bigger issue.

Well, thanks for letting me rant and rave.  Feel free to pick holes in my little complain fest (I'm sure there are many).  I enjoy reading the posts here because they are usually intelligent, witty and funny.  This is something that was really bugging me.

Take care.

P.S.   If someone nice enough wants to give me a membership to Chelsea's website for my birthday, the e-mail is....just kidding, I know that's wrong and I would just be contributing to my own argument.  

Have a good day.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrHHH on November 19, 2003, 08:40:40 PM
It seems when you have to pay for something, you take it more seriously. Conversation on pay-only message boards is quite good.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sonic_Morph on November 20, 2003, 01:49:12 AM
I'm guessing it's probably the same idiots that post how much they loathe her in the joggs.com UG....I'm also guessing those guys havent hit puberty yet either....

Sonic.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jet on November 20, 2003, 03:30:49 AM
The posts in the Joggs UG are really bad.  Most message boards that don't require registration are usually flooded with juveniles or idiots who like to play games  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on November 20, 2003, 07:04:16 AM
Quote:

The posts in the Joggs UG are really bad.  Most message boards that don't require registration are usually flooded with juveniles or idiots who like to play games  




God bless all of us who are 'Registered' BEA Forum posters!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on November 20, 2003, 09:57:20 PM
We were going to bring something like this up....but really didn't know how to begin....thanks for starting it off.

We have been a little dissapointed lately with all the Chelsea-bashing threads in the forums. We know...and *she* knows, that she caters to a specific audience.... but people on the internet can be downright cruel. We don't expect everything written about her to be a glowing tribute....but there *has* to be a beter way for someone to express the fact that she may not be "your cup of tea".

Now we also don't mean this as sensorship...we have read things from people with firsthand experience either at her shows....from private sesions...or reffering to her videos... everyone has a right to thier opinions based on thier experiences. Its the "blind" bashing that bothers us.

We have said this before...Dick and Jane live in several different worlds... but we don't know anyone that we hold in a higher regard than Chelsea....She is all class...and as elegant as they come...smart...down to earth...funny...and just alot of fun to be around.....We just really hate the thought of her feelings being hurt.

We just ask that before anyone writes anything...think how you would feel if these same words were being written about you.

-D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: lactose_tolerant on November 21, 2003, 05:07:25 AM
eloquently stated dickandjane.  however, with any business, the consumer has a right to their perception.  anyone that  works for a company that relies on customer surveys to determine the customer satisfaction will agree.  seeing as how chelsea's body is her business, consumers will have perceptions not unlike any other business.  for example, some may say that big macs absolutely suck while at the same time espouse the virtues of whoppers.(intended pun) what chelsea does with these perceptions will determine what type of business she runs.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: H_man on November 21, 2003, 08:42:39 AM
Hey! That's not a Big Mac(tm)! Years of advertising brain washing have taught me that much. I prefer whoppers (pun intended and appreciated) myself.
As for Chelsea, you'll never hear a bad word about her from me. At shows, after shows, in private dances, in correspondence, she's always been an absolute delight for me.
That said, it is her livelihood we're talking about here. She's in complete control and that's how it should be. Maybe it's not going in the direction we'd like, but we get to vote with our dollars. It's a tough business and not everybody is going to like everything you do no matter what you do. Just ask Melonie about the perils of trying to provide a free message board and what a few jerks can do to a bandwidth bill.
Chelsea is getting what she wants out of this. Maybe not as fast as she'd like. But she is investing her money and building casa charms to her own specifications, and what's more fun than that?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Offline on November 21, 2003, 02:47:27 PM
When one enters the public spotlight, either by becoming a performer/entertainer, or athletic star, they are going to encounter both good and bad comments.  This is part of the package.  No one makes these people become "**28**," except in the case of some [censored] actors.  If you want to be known to many people on a somewhat impersonal basis, then you will have those that dislike you as well as those that like you.  The public loves to have those that it hates as well as those that it loves, and no one will ever change that.  So one should think twice before entering the spotlight if they feel they cannot stand up to criticism whether it be due to valid or not existant reasons.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jaytas on November 21, 2003, 03:46:37 PM
Me thinks there should be some seperating happening. Like for example seperate Chelsea the human being from Chelsea the performer. Also seperate Chelsea the human who may not be into the job big time too while you are at it.

In my case I am not my job by any means. In fact my job sucks. I do it so I can eat, and other stuff too of course.

But. Seeing my job is way huge in customer contact I put on my smilie face and do it in such a way that gets the job done.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Slice on November 21, 2003, 05:18:56 PM
Hey,

I was wondering, there are quite a few pix of chelsea floating around fom years goen bye at different shows etc... I have only seen like 3 or four from 2003, does anybody have any? Also is there anyone in the UK with any of her DVD's videos? that would wanna sell/swap etc... Finally does anyone know what her plans are for 2004? I can't be a member of her site and see her web diary at the moment but I am planning to after xmas. Also another big up to Keisha for showing us you can get to chelsea's size without string! I think that point hasn't been made enough! Take note all aspiring dancers/models that wanna supersize!!!

Slice  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Johnny_Swell on November 21, 2003, 06:02:45 PM
 I met Chelsea in Florida a couple of years ago in an otherwise empty (literally) club.  I thought she was very… nice.  She didn’t seem to have that “act” down that you see most of the time, she was reasonably open and a complete class act.  It was refreshing to not get the standard hard sell for photos or videos. I ended up sitting and talking with her for about 20 minutes, and it was nice to talk about normal things with someone who is a genuinely nice person in a place so often full of the polar opposite.  I drew a *really* bad portrait because it was one of the darkest clubs I'd ever been in.  The subject came up that she might want a "regular" drawing for the webpage, and everything was fine until I asked a question I had seen posted online.  I asked her "So I saw online some posts, is it true that you are still growing?" And it was like turning on the AC in an already cool room.  I think in that moment, in her eyes, I went from "halfway normal guy" to "One of *those* guys".  I wasn't sure but I wrote back afterwards and asked if there was any particular theme she'd like to see in her drawing and I didn't hear back, and doubt she's interested and frankly I don't blame her!  I see what people post about her, because she doesn't live her life to pander to the lowest common denominator.  Yes, as an entertainer you have a duty to entertain.  She does that just by being who she is, a genuinely nice and classy lady who doesn't want her public image to become too "slutty" in order to get more attention (save the “private dance” defense, you know what I mean).  Half the posts on her message board went something like "U R so hot my dong throbs to C Ur titties grow and grow until you can't move and they explode!".   That isn’t an exaggeration, it’s actually toned down.
She had implants that were new and still relatively experimental, and didn’t think she would end up like she is now.   She is the poster [censored] for expanding implants but it’s a post she never applied for.  Just because it is happening doesn’t mean she has to be thrilled about it, and many of the posts I’ve seen seem to focus a bitter anger that she isn’t the mental mirror of her physical attributes and doesn’t post constantly about how she hopes her breasts grow so big she can’t fit in a car.  Hence the comparisons that started with Keisha.  Keisha is growing and she *likes* it, and for some reason some morons out there believe that because Chelsea is still bigger she has some kind of obligation to feel the same way.  Chelsea is a unique person who *HAPPENS* have the biggest proportionate breasts in the biz.  She is not life support for a pair of inflating boobs.   Having her unique figure is a means for her to get the things she wants in life, and because she chooses not to spend her free time indulging fantasies she doesn’t have with fanboys that do, that doesn’t make her any less beautiful or entertaining.  It just means she is being true to herself and as far as my opinion, that’s something that deserves respect and admiration.  Enjoy what she is willing to share and be grateful for that much, try to grab for more and she’ll just slip away like so many others have.

Johnny Swell of the North (North Las Vegas that is)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on November 21, 2003, 08:25:50 PM
After reading all the posts a recurring thought comes to mind. Having seen all the negative references to CC's  pictures on Joggs.com it's nice to see such glowing references to her wit and charm here.

Secondly, the sad truth is the lack of maturity of many of there detractors. The lack of discretion, the inability to compliment one performer without making a derogatory comment of another in comparision, etc.

Third is the fickle nature of youth. They flock to one performer for a time and then turn on them with a passion when the next "big thing" comes along.

Many good comments have been made and those of Dick and Jane, and Johnny Swell were especially good. I'm glad to find this discussion established.

Catch of the South (Southern Indiana that is)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: The_L on November 21, 2003, 08:36:39 PM
Quote:

Hey,

I was wondering, there are quite a few pix of chelsea floating around fom years goen bye at different shows etc... I have only seen like 3 or four from 2003, does anybody have any? Also is there anyone in the UK with any of her DVD's videos? that would wanna sell/swap etc... Finally does anyone know what her plans are for 2004? I can't be a member of her site and see her web diary at the moment but I am planning to after xmas. Also another big up to Keisha for showing us you can get to chelsea's size without string! I think that point hasn't been made enough! Take note all aspiring dancers/models that wanna supersize!!!

Slice  





Hopefully, her plans for 2004 would be to make a decent video.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: J_Panda on November 21, 2003, 09:17:36 PM
as i came wandering by i had to say i agree with the stuff said here. it does annoy me when someone instantly accuses a person with measurements lke chelsea as some dumm slut steriotypists sometimes really really get up my nose, or that just becuase she doesn't appeal to them that they have to voice it in a way that means to insult her, ive argued for chelsea and others on many occasions becuase all my mates are vitual minimalists of the breast liking kind. takefully most of them just say she isn't my cup of tea but one or two are always "shes distgusting" or "gross" "god i can't believe you like her" raaaaaaaaaaaghhhhh! people can really annoy. finishing of the point shes a great gal and no way near deserves the shit she gets from people

idiot of the east (east of england that is)

"everyone was doing it i just wanted to follow the band wagon"  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on November 21, 2003, 11:03:01 PM
Yeah, I was going to say that. Keisha does look larger than Chelsea. Especially in L's sig there.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on November 22, 2003, 01:33:17 AM
I really hesitate to respond to this thread, especially where Chelsea is concerned since she is such a sweetheart on a personal basis, but there are some points here which carry over to all girls in the big boobs business including myself.

#1 - Anybody selling a "service" on the internet enters into an unspoken business relationship with their "customers" - the person selling the "service" collects the monthly fees, and in turn the "customers" have a right to expect that they will receive certain things in exchange for the money they paid.  The certain things might be a particular quality of pictures, a particular number of new pics and videos per month, a certain amount of active involvement by the person selling the "service" on a website BBS etc.  Whether or not the "customers" feel they have been adequately served depends both on how much money they are being charged per month and how well their expectations are met in relation to what the seller advertised and also in relation to what the rest of the industry provides for a similar amount of money.

#2 - anybody selling a "product" on the internet also enters into an unspoken business agreement with their "customers".  If that product is a video tape, the person selling the "product" collects a certain amount of money, and in turn the "customers" buying the video tape have a right to expect certain things in exchange for their money.  These customer expectations may include technical video quality, content, length, or such mundane issues as prompt shipment.  Again, whether or not the customers have been adequately served depends both on the amount of money charged for the "product" and the degree to which customer expectations have been met in relation to what the seller advertised and also in relation to what the rest of the industry provides for a similar amount of money.

In either case, if customers feel that the person who "sold" them the service or product has not met reasonable customer expecations in proportion to the amount of money they charged, the customers have a right to bitch.

If, however, the customers knowingly spent their money and received exactly what was offered, then they do NOT have the right to bitch that what they actually received does not measure up to some unspecified standard which the customer arbitrarily chooses to set.

In America there is such a legal principle as 'caveat emptor' - let the buyer beware - which basically gives the seller any benefit of the doubt.  On the other hand, there are also legal principles such as truth in advertising and 'generally accepted' quality standards and timely delivery, and if the seller does not meet these standards then customers have every right to bitch.

If anyone is going to bitch about my own website and videos, or Chelsea's website(s) and videos, or any other model's website and videos, please confine it to factually based criticism. Considering that Chelsea provides something that nobody else in the industry can provide (i.e. the biggest boobs in the business, proportionately speaking), subjective criticism aimed in her direction should meet an even higher standard than criticism of others in the business who provide 'less'.  

Lastly, people who are not "customers", i.e. people who have not spent any money on a service or product, have absolutely no right whatsoever to bitch about something which was provided for their enjoyment for free !
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on November 22, 2003, 03:49:57 AM
Melonie is exactly right.  I would like to add that if you order a videotape from a big boob girl, or anybody else, via the U.S. Postal Service, and you don't like it, you have 30 days to get your money back. It is a U.S. Law. So, in fact, bitching is not necessary, just get a refund if you ever feel ripped off, and the message will be heard louder than any complaint you give here or elsewhere.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on November 22, 2003, 09:37:18 AM
Quote:


....but there *has* to be a beter way for someone to express the fact that she may not be "your cup of tea".






Hi,

Some people intent to write cruel things. And some people using the wrong words by simply beeing unfamiliar with choosing the correct words, because it isn't their mother tonque.

andrat2000
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: E_W on November 22, 2003, 10:39:54 AM
Nevertheless, it's unconsiderate not to take care when phrasing comments.  We're not talking comments along the lines of "I don't like boobies that big", we're talking much worse, immature stuff.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Windlord on November 22, 2003, 11:24:29 AM
I don't know her, and don't have any data to bring up for consideration of others about her. I only know that blind bashing, bad wording, and inmature insulting just takes away from you the right to complain, you can bash and denounce any situation or bad experiences by using a mature language, if you're unable to do so: don't complain, mature a bit.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on November 23, 2003, 08:34:20 AM
I just hope this doesn't sound like spam.

I just purchased the current Bosumquest Episode on Chelsea. I am happy, happy, happy. She looks a little pooped in some of the pics, but the videos show her to be very animated and energetic. I truly felt I received a proper value for my money.
There. I said it........that done, I love them huge boobies.
 
Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jayjay88 on November 24, 2003, 03:25:28 PM
Slice, if you are thinking about joining Chelsea's site, you should do it now.  Until Nov 30th, joining is only $9.95 and remains so as long as you stay a member: pretty good deal.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jayjay88 on November 24, 2003, 04:31:42 PM
I'm also glad to see this thread...and to read the positive comments of people of have met Chelsea.  And thanks for your personal sharing Johnny...which indicates what can happen when we treat a model as a person, contrasted to the response when she sees herself viewed as a 'quantity'.

Chelsea is a unique example of the big bust phenomenon in that she didn't choose to keep growing.  But having made her initial choice, she has obviously decided to live with in thus far...and cash in on the response.  I personally preferred her proportions when we first became aware of her. And while i love big boobs and even morph big boobs into bigger boobs, i always go for 'quality' rather than 'quantity'...quality in the case of big boobs for me is proportion and shape etc.  

In terms of 'personality bashing' etc, i think we all can see how various individuals express themselves over time here at the BEA in particular.  Actually it amazes me at tiems how many reasonable and articulate people hang around a place like this.  There are of course some who misuse their freedom of expression, and abuse models or the participants here.  

I do have to say that i don't remember any terrible Chelsea bashing here recently...and the thread about her attitude during the 'private dance' session was a fair expression of 'buyer beware', especially with the seasoned comments from Chilli Palmer.

At any rate, it's good to read positive things.
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Traxellus on November 24, 2003, 10:32:23 PM
Is it possible to join Chelsea's site without the use of a credit card?  Does she accept money orders, or are there other alternatives?

Take care  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on November 25, 2003, 01:42:26 AM
If she still uses CCBill I believe they accept a bank check. Here's where it gets confusing. Some paysites require direct access to you bank account others will take a check. Just go check it out.

I need to do the same thing with Keisha's site. If she only takes VISA then my Mastercard isn't priceless.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on November 30, 2003, 11:42:02 PM
If the Xmen met Chelsea Charms...
well...see the attachment (^_^).


 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on December 06, 2003, 02:25:13 PM
Can anyone confirm this?   Her website travel schedule is winding down with no more appointments coming up for the new year!  Looks like she is packing it in!   Guess I can't blame her if she is - but I will not forget her!    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: cynic on December 06, 2003, 02:38:33 PM
That's quite a conclusion you've jumped to there.  It's winter in the United States and maybe her breasts simply need to hibernate for a while.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on December 06, 2003, 04:52:21 PM
I'm hoping that her schedule has been cleared for her to complete her dream house.
That's my hope, and I'm sticking to it.

Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on December 06, 2003, 08:28:05 PM
I hope that it is not true also.  She will always remain the queen of implants in my mind.  
I will never forget holding those babies at Market Street in June 2002 !!!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on December 06, 2003, 09:01:02 PM
I agree ... that is quite a leap ... is it an orange day?

-Munch "I dub thee Chicken Little" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on December 06, 2003, 09:33:43 PM
I can't see Chelsea retiring while she is still very much at the top of the game. There are a lot of girls in the big boob business, but for sheer size combined with beauty, she is in a clss of her own. If she does retire, I'm gonna cry myself blind.

Pixeltiger    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: PregNut on December 06, 2003, 11:36:02 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Apeiron on December 06, 2003, 11:44:51 PM
man that would suck... i hope she doesnt
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on December 07, 2003, 12:25:30 AM
Nice rumor, but a schedule page that has no updates is a long way from a retirement announcement.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: snoopyh42 on December 07, 2003, 12:38:05 AM
If Chelsea retires then the terrorists win!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on December 07, 2003, 03:41:08 AM
May I say in the abscence of any other indications - False Alarm!

CC often clears her schedule whenever vacations, moving, and even winter hits. This has happened before. This may be the dreaded "r" word about to occur, but until something substantial breaks sit tight. Chelsea's tops certainly are.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: E_W on December 07, 2003, 04:53:51 AM
An empty schedule is nine times out of ten a sign of not updating schedules properly.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: shadowcom on December 07, 2003, 07:48:33 AM
Maybe, because of pregnancy ?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on December 07, 2003, 08:03:40 AM
Oh no not this sh.... what's the use.

Cruised by Chelsea.com and the site is being revamped with several interesting extras.
1. A contest to suggest a new website design.

2. A page of Chelsea morphs. Looks like the same one from yourwinnerChelseaCharms.com I think. Contains several pics from BEA artists. Shuge, jayjay88, and Steveo to name a few.

Yes, just the sort of behavior you would expect from a feature entertainer about to retire - or take a pregnancy leave.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ample1 on December 07, 2003, 08:30:51 AM
a pregnant chelsea charms.. I can only dream! best of both worlds...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on December 07, 2003, 09:46:20 AM
ooooh .. I know .. I know ... she's getting a sex change ...

cue munchelsea pic here ...

-Munch "let's all play the weird rumor game" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jithero on December 07, 2003, 10:23:33 AM
I heard Chelsea is selling her boobs to Fairuza!

-Jithero "Cue the headswap in 3...2...1..."
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on December 07, 2003, 03:34:16 PM
It's kinda like a landslide in here. Once set loose, it gathers speed and mass.
I had another stray thought: Maybe a vacation from us fanatics?

See Ya
Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jayluvsbe on December 07, 2003, 03:58:10 PM
uh.......what was the question again?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: shadowcom on December 07, 2003, 04:27:45 PM
A1: a pregnant chelsea charms.. I can only dream! best of both worlds...

In this case she'll be obliged to remove her implants or to drain her breasts at last twice per month because of very considerable fluid accumulation during the pregnancy periode. Her skin will not be able to stretch so much and so fast. This problem will be observed for any BB-model, having string implants, during the whole periode of pregnancy - for Minka, or even for Melonie Charm (MC). However, for MC the problem of pregnancy is not more actual.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: boobman69 on December 07, 2003, 05:09:49 PM
I don't believe that for one bit!

Instead of mindlessly speculating, come over to my site and vote for your favorite Chelsea outfit!  

http://www.sarennamania.com/chelsea/chelsea.html
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on December 07, 2003, 08:03:39 PM
Cross between that floral outfit (My longtime favorite, but pics of it seem scarce, sides for those bad quality ones that I always find) or that pink one on the right hand side.

Chelsea pregnant. You never know, she may be really small.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Breasts on December 07, 2003, 08:30:13 PM
I like the pink one on the right.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on December 07, 2003, 09:02:00 PM
Maybe she's planning on being **68** by space aliens?

-Munch "She comes from the planet of enormous hooters, and is going home" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: IowaGuy on December 08, 2003, 12:25:59 AM
Geez! Don't you guys know ANYTHING! Keisha knows what's going on. So does Melonie. They ALL know. It's the anual meeting of the Astronomicon Busticus Society. The largest breasted women in the world, both natural and otherwise, meet and decide the secret fates of the world, using the amazing powers of their monsterous breasts to rule all of our destinies. Duh.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on December 08, 2003, 12:34:38 AM
Or maybe a gathering of the JLA of buxom women? The Just Bust League? Either way, we must stop this and allow them to go save the World!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on December 08, 2003, 12:55:50 AM
Oy Gavolt...
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on December 08, 2003, 04:09:20 AM
I did not really expect a flurry of conjecture!  I was hoping someone knew something about this and could confirm.  Obviously we all know nothing.  Oh well, back to oggling!
 
Here is a cool before and after that still amazes me    
 
IMAGE ATTACHMENT DELETED... CHELSEA PHOTOCLUBS IMAGES ARE NOT ALLOWED AT THIS SITE. PLEASE DON'T DO IT AGAIN!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on December 08, 2003, 05:16:32 AM
Allow me to clarify.

The conjecture is our way of saying "possible, but very highly unlikely". In other words, until something official breaks - no one is looking for disaster.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on December 08, 2003, 09:20:19 AM
I heard that....woops, wrong thread.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on December 08, 2003, 09:29:06 AM
Vixen knows Chelsea's webmaster, why not ask her?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on December 08, 2003, 08:11:48 PM
does vix and chelsea have the same webmaster?

-Munch "Lucky bastard .. wonder who he is?: Wolf  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: The_L on December 08, 2003, 11:29:29 PM
Chelsea Charms retiring? Retiring from what? She doesn't do anything.
What is she retiring from, making appearances? She's gonna always make appearances as long as she exists, WTF?
Making two or three boring, lame, wannabe movies?
What?
She doesn't do hardcore, thats fine and dandy, but she doesn't even do softcore right...blah
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: D_U_S_K on December 08, 2003, 11:48:20 PM
Hey...Munch didnt schedule to post next week....

DONT LEAVE THE BOARDS MUNCH!

Chicken Litte, Aye.

I believe there would be more to announcing Retirement than just a blank amount of time. She's a human being! She does need time to just rest. Doesnt have to be stared at all the time.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on December 09, 2003, 03:50:54 AM
MUNCH! Nooo! Don't leave us!


RandomX(I think we should just put this thread in the OTHER CC rumor thread...)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: rtpoe on December 09, 2003, 03:52:13 AM
I think she's on Special Assignment for a super-secret government agency.

Which government, I don't know....

rtpoe  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on December 09, 2003, 04:05:06 AM
Hope you have fun while your away, Munch.

Bypass - "Joining in on the latest unsupported rumor" - Catch22
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on December 09, 2003, 08:39:21 AM
Maybe I'm pregnant ...

-Munch "With DUSK's lovechild" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on December 09, 2003, 08:43:01 AM
Vixen keeps me plenty busy...

sheb "as if I didn't have enough to do" er
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on December 09, 2003, 08:43:56 AM
And where might Munch be going?

McKor"Obviously missed something"Mick
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on December 09, 2003, 09:00:07 AM
I'm retiring .. didn't you notice?  I'm running off to join a convent and have my baby in peace ...

-Munch "rosemary" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on December 09, 2003, 09:08:27 AM
I have no idea what youre talking about.

McKor"Obviously missed a whole lot"Mick
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on December 09, 2003, 10:44:18 AM
Quote:

I'm running off to join a convent and have my baby in peace ...  




You're all a bunch of wankers!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on December 09, 2003, 10:48:13 AM
Whoa, didnt see that one coming.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Blax12 on December 09, 2003, 10:55:26 AM
  [soap opera music] Munch, I have to reveal you the [censored] you are gonna have...it is not Dusk's son...it is Sadistyk's son [/soap opera music]

Blax12
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on December 09, 2003, 11:09:41 AM
Quote:

  [soap opera music] Munch, I have to reveal you the [censored] you are gonna have...it is not Dusk's son...it is Sadistyk's son [/soap opera music]

Blax12
 




  WTF?!?!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on December 09, 2003, 07:17:38 PM
Quote:

Munch, I have to reveal you the [censored] you are gonna have..




I believe, and correct if I'm wrong, Munch is going off to have his "inner" [censored] .

W

P.S. You are still all a bunch of wankers!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on December 09, 2003, 08:09:51 PM
Next time .. on As The Nipple Twists ...

RTPOE encounters his evil twin ...
tndvrs finds a vowel ...
homevintner is caught doing something naughty with a garden tool ...
and .... 'The Secret' is out ....

-Munch "is grainy tv action" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on December 10, 2003, 04:18:17 AM
You forgot DUSK running away to elope with HM80's identical twin brother.

Munch, will you make me the **09**'s godmother?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on December 10, 2003, 04:23:38 AM
Sorry, wanted to add this thread to my favorites and remembered after I hit reply. (feel free to delete this post if it bugs you)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: D_U_S_K on December 10, 2003, 05:17:35 AM
Im not running away with HM80's twin.

Im running away with Chelsea Charms, who believes She is Taylor Manner, due to Amnesia after retiring from the business.

The one who is running away with HM80-2...is...my evil twin. or good twin? I can never tell anymore.

Time to burn something.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on December 11, 2003, 04:36:40 AM
Quote:

You forgot DUSK running away to elope with HM80's identical twin brother.

Munch, will you make me the **09**'s godmother?  





WTF!?!


Heavy "Sadistyk said it best!" Metal  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on December 11, 2003, 05:50:40 AM
Well look whos still alive.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on December 11, 2003, 05:57:53 AM
Who's alive? Where? Why did you think they were dead?

Inquisitive little pest, ain't I. Did you know that inquisitive comes right after inquisition in my Funk and Wagnel?

Cue Munch with that Spanish thing.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on December 11, 2003, 06:03:59 AM
Quote:

Well look whos still alive.  





Amazing, isn't it?

 


I just heard 3000 people say "Oh fuck...not HIM!!"


Sorry...I'm back.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DrHyde on December 11, 2003, 06:56:39 AM
Eh, I don't have enough time anymore to hang out here....it sucks.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on December 11, 2003, 07:07:46 AM
Quote:

Eh, I don't have enough time anymore to hang out here....it sucks.  





It sucks...

Hmmm...


Well, that's not ALWAYS a BAD thing!!!


Heavy "OK, what were we talking about again?" Metal


 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on December 11, 2003, 08:45:34 AM
Something about illegitamate love childs.

McKor"Ha, I caught Heavy trying to derail it"Mick
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on December 11, 2003, 09:30:30 AM
damn .. HM back?? I guess I should retire ...

-Munch "the inquistion .. that's its name .. the inquistition .. that's its game ... " Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: PregNut on December 12, 2003, 12:46:46 AM
Can't think of a quote, so I'll just name the movie:

History of the World, Part One.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ElmerFudd on December 12, 2003, 03:06:38 AM
Quote:

Who's alive? Where? Why did you think they were dead?

Inquisitive little pest, ain't I. Did you know that inquisitive comes right after inquisition in my Funk and Wagnel?

Cue Munch with that Spanish thing.  




I'll do it!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on December 12, 2003, 03:25:22 AM
It's good to be the King...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on December 12, 2003, 05:28:10 AM
"I'll do it!" - Elmer Fudd

You certainly did!  Choice!

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on December 12, 2003, 06:54:54 AM
No seriously, what is it with all these CC threads getting so derailed?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DruulEmpire on December 12, 2003, 07:02:41 AM
Can't say I'm that surprised that the size of CC's thread runs as wild and free as the size of CC's chest.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on December 12, 2003, 07:05:13 PM
Quote:

No seriously, what is it with all these CC threads getting so derailed?  




Were a question posed to have but an ounce of common sense, it might be taken seriously.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on December 12, 2003, 08:04:23 PM
Gotcha.

So how about you Sheber? Hows your planning to be the first man on Mars going? I hear you're almost ready?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HeavyMetal1980 on December 12, 2003, 09:07:30 PM
Quote:

No seriously, what is it with all these CC threads getting so derailed?  





Her Breasts are so large they knock the God damn train off the tracks!!

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on December 13, 2003, 04:09:31 AM
Or maybe people are too busy thinking about her that they type random words in no particular order?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BNLsascha on January 04, 2004, 01:25:09 AM
The only thing I don't like the Vein(s) is that I am most unlikely to see 'em.
CHELSEA GET TO GERMANY !
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Freddy on January 05, 2004, 02:38:15 AM
I'd take it over the vein that popped out of my PE teacher's forehead when he got pissed (which was just about everyday).  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Bustylover on January 05, 2004, 09:49:52 AM
Chelsea is so beautiful, dream cum true!
BustyLover(o)(o)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Beachbum on January 08, 2004, 04:45:04 AM
I met her recently...she is nothing short of mesmerizing...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 08, 2004, 03:39:55 PM
HIGHLY erotic. lol
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on January 18, 2004, 11:57:39 PM
Just wondering if anybody has any opinions about the latest photoclub pictures of Chelsea. I let my membership run out. Just wondering if I need to rush to sign back up, or if it is the usual "tame" style layouts. Let me know.....       P.S...... I included one of my all time favorite Chelsea pictures.    

ATTENTION: STEVEICE and others - The posting of PhotoClub pictures of Chelsea Charms, or any other of the models who are participating in the PhotoClub service is strictly prohibited here at the BEA. Your attachment has been deleted. Please read the rules as listed in this forums 2nd message. Thanks.

 

MasterBlaster - Moderator
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ApesMa on January 19, 2004, 03:04:31 AM
I just looked...the current two sets show Chelsea in a lovely maroon top, and in an equally lovely lacy white top. Chelsea is as beautiful as ever, but the Photoclubs photographers seem uncontaminated by any notions of photographic composition or lighting. Sometimes they get it right, but it seems to be by accident more than anything.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 19, 2004, 03:14:33 AM
I think this picture might be OK, as it is not from Photoclubs, but a sample/teaser frpm CC's site.  This is only for promotional purposes only...and as you all know, I am a shameless CC promoter and member of her site as well as CP and BQ!  So there!  This should be legal enough, Cubeman or Chelsea have always OK'ed a sample in the past.

Whink!
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 19, 2004, 03:15:58 AM
OK, one more teaser/sample from the second last Photoclubs update as well.  BUT NOT A PHOTOCLUBS PICTURE!!  No Copyright breaking going on, so let;s everyone keep our BVD's on.

Whink
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 19, 2004, 03:18:38 AM
Quote:

OK, one more teaser/sample from the second last Photoclubs update as well.  BUT NOT A PHOTOCLUBS PICTURE!!  No Copyright breaking going on, so let;s everyone keep our BVD's on.

Whink  




OOPS, forgot the attachment.  

ATTN: Whindinkler - I deleted the image. As I said earlier go back and read the rules. This image deleted for THIS RULE:

The Forums are not galleries. One image per thread per user is the limit. The photo of Chelsea is a quantity violation. Please do not say, "Oh, just one more!"

 
    MB
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 19, 2004, 03:20:51 AM
Quote:


ATTENTION:Your attachment has been deleted. Please read the rules as listed in this forums 2nd message. Thanks.

   (mad as a hatter icon used)
MasterBlaster - Moderator




Masterblaster, please PM me if you have a problem with sample pictures as well!  (Even if they have been cleared by the proper authorities and thought police).

Cheers

Whink
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 19, 2004, 01:42:40 PM
The most current one ( january 14/15) finally GOT NEW ANGLES.. lol.  looks hotter than previous stuff, but off course still is tame. :-)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on January 19, 2004, 03:45:03 PM
In My Humble Opinion, keeping in mind that I regress to a very early childhood style of behavior whenever I see Chelsea (drooling and gurgling and such), the latest batch of Photoclubs Pics is great. Positioning Chelsea with her legs spread, with her TITS between them?.....arrrrrrrgeeeeelllllldddssssssswww.......see what I mean?
Enjoy.
Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 19, 2004, 10:27:05 PM
Quote:


ATTN: Whindinkler - I deleted the image. As I said earlier go back and read the rules. This image deleted for THIS RULE:

The Forums are not galleries. One image per thread per user is the limit. The photo of Chelsea is a quantity violation. Please do not say, "Oh, just one more!"

 
    MB




OK, Masterblaster, but just remember that you don't apply this rule evenly!  Remember that in the cases of:
1. Vixen
2. Keisha Evans
3. Bambi Blimps
4. Dr Curvy supplying pix of Bambi
...you allow more than one picture per poster per topic.

So if you're going to have rules, fine, but apply them uniformly not based on allowances for some but not for all.  Hey, I trhink limits suck and am happy that the above get to post multiple pictures.  Abuse is wrng.  In my case, I posted one example of each of two different photo sections that were in question.

So please, let's be fair.

Whink
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MasterBlaster on January 20, 2004, 03:04:03 AM
Yes, I missed those. Mea culpa. Applying the rules fairly is certainly ideal.

But this isn't a personal issue or a gender issue You were not singled out and held in contempt. Your 2nd image was simply deleted, and a request was made to read the rules. The notice was intended for the overall membership not just the poster.

All are expected to follow the rules, policies, etc.

If we visit and like this website, then we all have a responsibilty to keep it afloat. Some people contribute by paying membership fees, some people contribute by writing, drawing, painting, or through their computer skills. Others just participate in the forums, or look at the material offered. But the best way is to follow the rules, policies, etc.

The BEA is a work in progress which evolves continually as needs are discovered. It took only one poster to ignore the rules and the BEA had a problem. Everyone pretty much enjoyed the look at 17 Nadine pictures, or the Chelsea Charms images from Photoclubs. Everyone except the webmasters and owners of those sites.

Whether the images are of a Chelsea, or a Nadine, or Natasha, or some cute Thai girls, or just unknowns, we want the posting public to observe and follow either the rules, the policy, or the requests.

Lots of drivers speed on the highways, and some get speeding tickets. If some speeders got away undetected, this is not a reason for others to ignore the speed limits.

I hope you will see why the rules are in place, and focus on that, instead of feeling bad because one of your post attachments was sent to cyber oblivion.

MB


   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on January 20, 2004, 08:46:36 AM
whindinkler, the reason we have those rules is so models wont complain to the website. The women you mentioned all post their own material, so clearly have no promblem sharing and would not complain and forbid posting their images.
If you were chelsea, there would be no problem with you posting your own material, but since you're not her or her webmaster, you have no say in how many is ok. Thus the 1 picture courtesy rule.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on January 20, 2004, 11:06:33 AM
This topic has got off topic. Photoclubs "the most plain boring pose pictures taken" These guys don't seem to put any thought or effort into most of their shoots of any model, it looks to be a case of shoot it plain, shoot it quick, shoot all the money we can make to the bank.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RenegadeUK on January 20, 2004, 12:04:50 PM
Actually I think it is even simpler than that....the old SLR and 6x6 format manual cameras needed someone with brains to drive them...someone who knew about appatures, shutter speeds and film attributes....nowadays we have digital cameras that do everything for you and EVERYBODY thinks they can be a photographer.

So instead of a Pro, any and every nerk thinks he can be a photographer....so instead of hiring an artist who knows about lighting, framing, posing and cropping they snap away like lunatics in the hope that something will come out of it.....and the result quite frankly is crap....my 90 year old mother takes similar pictures (although not of nude large breasted women....hehe)

I have been frankly disgusted with the quality of recent Photoclubs and Score shoots. The lighting is all over the place or none existant, the girls are left to their own devices for posing.... giving some VERY unflattering results and forshortened body angles for the girls, no attention is paid to what is distracting from the pose in the background and very little attention is paid to sensible and necessary cropping. Just amateur and shit really.

If you want examples just cast a critical eye over recently released sessions with Casey James, Chelsea Charms, BB Gunns and Pandora Peaks and hold them side by side with the "Pro" shoots of 5 or 10 years ago.....'Nuff said


     
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on January 20, 2004, 12:54:14 PM
 
Quote:

 any and every nerk thinks he can be a photographer




I wanna be a nerk!

I agree so much Renegade. Just like the rest of the world, no one takes pride in their jobs anymore and just does the bare minimum. Even in the porn industry as shown here. As helpful as electronics are, they're slowly dumbing us down even more.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Lesbian Bob on January 21, 2004, 04:46:54 AM
I hate the shadow on the wall.  When will they learn to move the light or add a second light to eliminate this?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RenegadeUK on January 21, 2004, 09:11:19 AM
Bob....I loath that heavy wall shadow too....but erm .... move WHAT light?

These guys are using the built-in flash on the digi camera only....there is no lighting involved these days ... no floods, no key lights, no back lights, no soft spread umbrellas...that is part of what I was saying above....amateur shite  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on January 21, 2004, 10:04:58 AM
Well I'm happy to see that I'm not alone in my thoughts about the Photoclub shoots. It is a shame that they have all these hot, awesome babes to work with, and we get the quality that we get. Very frustrating......  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 22, 2004, 02:31:11 AM
Nice avatar Steve.  Where did you get it?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SpiderJerusalem on January 26, 2004, 04:07:40 AM
I personally love the fact that when you pay the 25-30 bucks to get ONE model on a site that has so many, you don't even get full access to the previous photosets! It's disgraceful and I just cannot believe that people continue to patronize this site. It's like the concession stand at the movies, popcorn and a soda: $7 but the idiots just keep lining up.

I think piracy of Photoclubs should be encouraged.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on January 26, 2004, 04:34:41 AM
Oh boy, here we go.

Actually, Im a fan of Chelsea, but Im dissapointed with both. Photoclubs, I hear no good about. Then I joined her site around Thanksgiving break. You know, when it was $9.99? I was beyond dissapointed at the selection. The pics were alright, this is true. But I was interested in the movies. So I go to check out the movies and lo and behold, five second crap quality clips. That should be on the preview page. Im paying now, if youre going to give me that, it should be atleast better quality. But no, they were the clips I took off Kazaa way back when. I was hoping for Photoclubs vids, you see. I knew better. But it wouldnt hurt to have some really old Photoclubs vids there. Its her site for crying out loud.

Glad it was only $10, or Id have been really angry.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on January 26, 2004, 10:23:15 PM
Hi,

just curious. Did someone of you guys get PM from Photoclubs because of your comments in this forum?

andrat2000
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on January 27, 2004, 03:41:24 AM
i guess PM means personal message ??. I don't think Photoclubs will take much notice they never have before.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: rtpoe on January 27, 2004, 04:32:28 AM
Jeez, that pic isn't even IN FOCUS.

rtpoe
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on January 27, 2004, 04:59:39 AM
Dunno about that. Isnt that how we ended up with this pic rule?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jet on January 27, 2004, 05:08:06 AM
I hope they realize that most of us don't care for their photography, and those who sign up are disappointed with what they get.  With all the models they have, they could put together something really great, but it seems that they are not interested in putting the extra effort into it.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on January 27, 2004, 05:39:29 AM
Nah. As long as they keep getting money they wont care.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RandomX on January 27, 2004, 07:24:12 AM
McCormick, the photo-rule was started with Score, and became much more enforced with Nadine, after someone posted an ENTIRE PHOTOSHOOT of hers. *sighs*

This is a forum, and unless they completely shut us down, there isnt really much they could do to deny us freedom of speech.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MermetTheHermit on January 27, 2004, 07:25:34 AM
I can't speak with regard to her Photoclubs site, but I've had considerable experience with chelseacharms.com.  Despite my deep fascination with her disturbingly expanded breasts, I must agree with McKormick and declare the site a disappointment.

What photos there were, were of sufficient quality (alas I can't compare with Photoclubs except for the few tame previews her site has).  But the videos were of poor resolution and extremely short, as noted earlier.  

My biggest problem with the site had been the infrequent and irregular updating.  There was no "updates" section where you could at least know how many weeks would pass before another photo set or video-tease would be posted.  Finding new material on the site was like, well... Uh, like, finding something that you don't, um, find often.  Disappointing, and not at all worth a recurring subscription.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on January 27, 2004, 07:30:27 AM
Hey, I said Sorry! It was so long ago, Ive learned my lesson!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on January 27, 2004, 10:22:08 AM
I know what you are saying about updates at chelseacharms.com. So frustrating. Anybody have an private dance stories about Chelsea? I know it is expensive, but the thought of holding those boobs in my hands is tempting.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on January 28, 2004, 12:11:34 AM
Quote:

i guess PM means personal message ??. I don't think Photoclubs will take much notice they never have before.    




Hm, I got response in "private mail" when I posted this message:
http://forum.bearchive.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB1&Number=132729&Forum=All_Forums&Words=3229&Match=Username&Searchpage=1&Limit=25&Old=allposts&Main=132729&Search=true#Post132729

I think it is time to share this mail communication. The conclusion is:
- before posting on the boards, talk to Photoclubs first if you are unsatisfied
- don't post photclubs pictures
- legal considerations make outdoor shootings difficult (no wonder with CC's two wonders)
- Photclubs wants to improve the updates (don't forget that the latest photo sessions of CC are still from before Fan Fair where Chelsea has had longer hairs)
- on certain circumstances might compensations be possible

OK heres the message:

Hello ........,

I may not be monitoring, but many of our customers are, and the let me
know when someone is blasting us or giving away our photos.  I think
the forums are great, but when you have a problem, please write me first,
then go to the boards.

When we shoot with Chelsea as well as other girls there are a lot of
constraints that would not be know to the customers.  So, they say why
don't you do this or why don't you do that. Believe me, your suggestions
are great and we would love nothing more than if we were free to shoot
everything we want to.  

We want to provide value to our customers, and do this by breaking even
or taking a loss on our bosomquest episodes. You may have noticed the
price went way down. I hope you are taking advantage of that.

We would love to shoot outside more as well, but legal considerations
are one of many things that make it harder than it looks.

Thanks for writing, and thanks for choosing us.

Warm Regards,

Scott C.
photoclubs.com




>
> <removed>
> Date: 2003/10/01 Wed PM 05:19:03 EDT
> To: Scott C. <removed>
> Subject: Re: Chelsea Update
>
> Hello Scott,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
> It is interresting to see that you monitor forums like
> BEA. I personally think it is important to discuss
> such things also in public.
>
> It is really not necessary for me that you provide me
> access to another girl. I'm happy with your answer and
> that I can reply to it. And I promise it will be only
> this one unless you say different :-)
>
> I belive a photo shooting for a half year of updates
> supply is hard work for one/two days up to a week for
> your team (and of course Chelsea). Few times there
> might be scenes with a larger number of unsatisfying
> pictures.
> I fully understand that Photoclubs don't want to give
> these pictures away for free. It is your business. But
> isn't it possible that Photoclubs provides 1-3 scenes
> (those with unsatisfying pictures) per half year as
> bonus to their members?
>
> One point left from my side. The US is big country.
> There should be places where Chelsea's breasts don't
> need hiding because of only few people strolling by.
>
> Only my 5 cents worth.
>
> Best Regards,
> .....
>
>  --- Scott C. <removed> wrote: >
> Hello,
> >
> > We are working to improve the current update of
> > Chelsea Charms. However,  I would like to give you a
> > free 2 week pass to another girl, since you are
> > unhappy with the update.  Please let me know which
> > girl you would like to try for 2 weeks.  Photoclubs
> > only please.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Scott C.
> > photoclubs.com
> >
Quote:

I don't think I get a usefull answer, but maybe they
have some of our mails in background on the next
shooting.




> >
> > We do like the outdoor stuff as well. However,
> > finding a private place where Chelsea would not
> > bring attention is very difficult.  We appreciate
> > your business, and if you have a problem at
> > photoclubs, please contact us.  


bye,
andrat2000  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McKormick on January 28, 2004, 12:37:52 AM
They went down did they? Funny. No comment on that message, BTW. I can only wonder if they got the critique and reason why people were dissing them instead of just a "Hey, these people think you suck" notice.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Offline on January 28, 2004, 01:21:17 AM
Let's see, PCLubs is a business in the public eye and they don't think that people are going to discuss their products and services. "oh, don't make fun of me (in my whiniest and most crybaby voice)."  If an individual or corp is producing A-1 goods and services I can see them being a little upset about a little negative commentary.  However, if someone was producing A-1 material they wouldn't have to substantiate their shortcomings to each individual.  People will gladly pay for great products and services they wish to have.  On the other hand, people will not pay for items that do not meet their expectations, especially in times where their money has to be stretched further.  Give the public you're best shot and they will come looking for you once word of mouth gets around.  Then as a vendor, you will not have to go around to each person trying to convince them otherwise.

The almighty dollar will always be King, until that big ole asteroid decides to hook a right turn and make an unplanned visit.

Say goodnight Gracie.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: rtpoe on January 28, 2004, 04:46:11 AM
Give them credit for at least listening.

(Hi Scott C.!)

rtpoe
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on February 02, 2004, 03:17:20 AM
Anybody have the scoop on the latest photoclubs update with Chelsea Charms?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on February 02, 2004, 03:33:02 AM
The February 1 Photoclubs update for Chelsea is up and has me drooling, like thats a big surprise. I hate to say more, sounds like spam.

I enjoyed it, anyway.
Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on February 02, 2004, 05:14:59 AM
The scoop? You want to maturbate to a description of her photos?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on February 02, 2004, 05:50:07 AM
Ozzy! Please! Go right ahead and sound like spam in the can.

Clothes, poses, background - the works. Bend our ears. Just don't post any forbidden pictures (Can't believe I said that last part, but that's the rules).
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on February 02, 2004, 06:21:11 AM
That's a good one...lol. I'm not going to jack off to the desciption. I let my membership run out a copuple of weeks ago. Just wanted to know if the pictures got any better or if it the same boring photoclubs stuff.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on February 02, 2004, 09:23:01 AM
The basics of this update has her posing in a lace-up top, kind of a peasant style. She is posed one and around a table, even posed resting her breasts on the table. There are even a couple of my favorite style of poses: Breasts on the table, with her head resting on them. It boggles the imagination as to her size. For the nay-sayers: Yes, some are slightly out of focus. Some are also cropped. My guess is the photographer might be having troubles with his concentration.

Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on February 02, 2004, 03:44:48 PM
I'm sure they are just as boring as your Avatar.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: FrankGrimes on February 02, 2004, 05:42:35 PM
whats a copuple???    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on February 02, 2004, 11:42:07 PM
not the best possible quality. but the tits on table is HOT as FIRE !
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ApesMa on February 03, 2004, 03:49:23 AM
Quote:

not the best possible quality. but the tits on table is HOT as FIRE !  



Especially when she is resting her head on them. (OK, the profile shot is incredible, too...)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on February 03, 2004, 04:12:05 AM
My Avatar is from the good old days. Some hot sexy outfits every once in awhile, not the same old stuff that photoclubs been giving us lately. I double checked my spelling this time around.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on February 03, 2004, 04:57:30 AM
I have no idea what her update is like. But since you see fit to use the photoclub material in your avatar, it seems odd that you complain.  If you don't want to join the site, then you shouldn't, and let that be that. How can other's tell you whether you should join a site or not? IMHO, value is a personal choice. There must be a million big boob sites out there.  Why not just pick another and move on.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on February 03, 2004, 06:09:18 AM
Not sure what your problem is but I am not the only who has had issues with photoclubs lately. I personally think they can be more creative with their layouts. Plain and simple. Chelsea is one of a kind and I have been a fan of hers from day one and will continue to be a fan. These last two updates are the only ones I have missed in the last couple of years. So what if I am curious about the latest updates, this is a forum to discuss different topics, like her recent updates. I have checked out other sites, Keisha Evans site is great, lots of updates and she seems like a pretty cool chick. My avatar is from one the older photoclub layouts when I personally think they were being more creative.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on February 03, 2004, 02:43:28 PM
It just struck me as odd that you were complaining about one of her paysites and you use a photo from that same site as an avatar, but then wanted to hear about the latest update. It makes sense to me now. You want to join that site again, and want to pick the best time to return.  I was thinking, if you don't like a site, screw em, and go somewhere else.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on February 04, 2004, 07:06:26 AM
Yeah, just wanted to know what I was missing. Do you have any big boob sites that you have been to that you can recomend? Always looking for something good.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on February 04, 2004, 02:57:13 PM
Sorry Steve, I don't have any to recommend, other than the bearchive, Scoreland, Hustler busty Beauties. I get spammed with hundreds of others, so I know there are plenty out there.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: peschi on February 04, 2004, 05:17:44 PM
Quote:

Sorry Steve, I don't have any to recommend, other than the bearchive, Scoreland, Hustler busty Beauties. I get spammed with hundreds of others, so I know there are plenty out there.  




The Bettie/Nadine websites are GREAT, fantastic photography, great, GREAT models and.....Milena Velba (wich soon will have her own site). All that for $13! It's for me proof that a quality website don't have to be expensive.

Peschi  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on February 04, 2004, 10:27:18 PM
I used to subscribe to her site, but it was a complete waste of money!  I am sure Photoclubs is a bit better, but still know what you're getting into before you start getting the credit card bills.

Avoid Chelsea Charms' own website like the plague!!!!

Whink
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on February 04, 2004, 10:59:38 PM
I also let my membership run out at Chelsea's personal site. Hard to complain for $9.95, but the lack of updates was crazy. I have seen some pictures of Milena. Just when you think we are running out of big boob stars, she comes along. She is awesome. Have any of you guys seen some lady, I think her name is Karola or something close to that. She has some meat on her bones and she is not the prettiest model, but strictly for massive massive boobs, se is impressive. I am also going to check out Vanessa Montagues site. I think she is hott.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on March 04, 2004, 02:10:07 PM
Look at how HUGE her breasts look in this pic - they take up the surface area of her whole upper body....DAMN !!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: IowaGuy on March 04, 2004, 02:30:05 PM
She's a Goddess now? A genuine Goddess? Crap! Does this mean we have to start sacrificing virgins to her?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on March 04, 2004, 02:38:07 PM
Quote:

Look at how HUGE her breasts look in this pic - they take up the surface area of her whole upper body....DAMN !!  




Yeah, she looks absoutely amazing!  She is getting absurdly huge...I just wish she would do more for her fans, like update her website on a regular basis!

That is why I dropped out of it...along with qa ton of others.  I know of at least $250 she's not getting a month now!

But here's a pic for the cause!
Whink
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: The_Fonz on March 04, 2004, 04:48:54 PM
Is it just my imagination or are Chelsea's nipples now on the side of her breasts, when they used to be on the front?

Anyone have an older pic to compare with these two?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on March 04, 2004, 04:58:10 PM
Nearly since the beginning they are near the sides. It seems her breasts have grown more on the inner side. Basically I don't care where her nipples are. She has killer looks.

bye,
andrat2000
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on March 04, 2004, 06:46:00 PM
GoCubsGo, you preachin to the choir as far as I am concerned. Alongside the woefully underrated BB Gunns, Chelsea represents the very apex of big boob perfection. Truly, we are not worthy

Pixeltiger - tugging forelock and genuflecting  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UserInterface on March 04, 2004, 06:54:55 PM
her poor mangled nipples look warped sideways.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: fakebreastlover on March 04, 2004, 08:25:42 PM
Who's that in the pic with her?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on March 04, 2004, 09:01:37 PM
I also was one of the faithful Chelsea fans who just recently cancelled membership to her site primarily due to her lack of updates.

But to the point - Chelsea in clothing is beyond compare. What she does to t-shirts and tops are simply miraculous (couldnt think of a better word). Topless is another story.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: boobman69 on March 04, 2004, 09:34:10 PM
Quote:

Who's that in the pic with her?  




That is Crystal meth... I mean Crystal Gunns!

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MasterX0 on March 04, 2004, 10:03:06 PM
I agree that Chelsea is abousltly amazing. Her breast size is just simply  WOW.  But i can not say she is a goddess yet.  When temples dedicated to her are seen around the world, then she will be a  goddess indeed.

Man they look even larger than ever and they hang down to her waist!!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on March 04, 2004, 11:56:26 PM
Does it count to obsessively collect any and all images of her? Or to regularly have her image as a background on your PC? No? Damn, and I was planning on starting a new church, for tax purposes, of course....  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MasterX0 on March 05, 2004, 12:10:56 AM
Hhmm.  I bet if u work on it, u may be able to sneak that in by the govt.  U never know.  Theres enough relgions out theres so why not start a Chelsea 1?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on March 05, 2004, 02:29:45 AM
We have been singing the praises of Chelsea for a while now...and NOT because she has huge boobs either...

-D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Bustylover on March 05, 2004, 08:52:28 AM
Chelsea is real goddess to me.
I am buying all mags with her.
Bustylover  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gOOber on March 05, 2004, 10:35:57 AM
   She has really big breasts.  

     
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: __sb__ on March 05, 2004, 03:01:14 PM
She is my favorite as well and I concur with Davastav with how she looks in any clothing
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on March 05, 2004, 03:10:57 PM
Tiffany Towers was my all-time fave for several years.  Two major events changed that: 1) Tiffany's breast reduction :-(  and 2) Chelsea Charms' emergence into the Big-Bust scene.....  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 05, 2004, 04:34:25 PM
a modern fertility goddess :-) and her nipples were on the sides ever since her implants 'grew'
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on March 09, 2004, 01:28:28 AM
CC rocks !!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on March 09, 2004, 01:45:58 AM
she doesn't look all that much bigger to me at all. also i have moved on to other busty mods(not moderators, but models). I'm more focused on right now r SaRenna, Tiffany also Vixen....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on March 09, 2004, 05:42:29 AM
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but...

Maybe it was Chili that pointed out that CC often pulls her pants higher to affect one's perception about her boobs.

That's not to say she isn't a goddess or amazingly gigantic. Quite to the contrary. She is!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DrHyde on March 09, 2004, 06:02:25 AM
Yeah, Chelsea has really gotten up there in size.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crunk on March 09, 2004, 11:54:07 AM
What happened to both Chealsea and Crystal?!, lol. I haven't seen newer pictures of them for months. They both look so different. As far as I can remember Crystal looked the pic in my attachment.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Faulkner on March 10, 2004, 10:55:20 AM
In the past, she would do similar things (e.g., keep her robe closed about her waist, leave her shirt pulled down around her waist, or even wear a belly chain) either to cover her stretch marks or at least divert one's attention from them.

Sadly -- and as a Chelsea fan, I'm trying hard not to be indelicate -- I'm fairly certain that she now pulls her pants up higher to help hide the fact that she's gained a fair amount of weight of late.

     
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on March 11, 2004, 09:12:48 PM
she makes Crystal look tiny....  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on March 15, 2004, 02:59:48 AM
Hello ladles and jellyspoons,

As I was flipping around my hard drive looking for a non-boob-related file, I discovered some pics I took at the ED Expo in 2000. Now bear in mind this was more than three years ago and Chelsea is even bigger now. But this picture IMHO sums up her awesome size and also her bewitching grace.

La Reine

Breathtaking n'est-ce pas?

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: maybeenuf4u on March 15, 2004, 03:53:28 AM
Amazing huh? Look at the way her arm hits her breast. Uhh!

Udderly fabulous!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Highlander on March 15, 2004, 04:26:59 AM
It amazes me how come she's not using her breasts for writing support... I guess it would be much easier then bending down to use her legs...


--------------------
That is, unless she's near sighted.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Wolfman1066 on March 15, 2004, 06:04:27 AM
Quote:

It amazes me how come she's not using her breasts for writing support... I guess it would be much easier then bending down to use her legs...


--------------------
That is, unless she's near sighted.  




  What if her pen went through the paper?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Duo187 on March 15, 2004, 06:14:59 AM
Yes, Chelsea is something else.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on March 15, 2004, 06:32:58 AM
Ya, Chelsea is just totally mind boggling period.  However, I think she has undergone a slight size decrease from the draining of fluid from her implants.  She did so sometime last year if I remember correctly.  Regardless, I really wonder if anyone will ever again come close to or surpass "Chelsea-size".  About a year ago I saw her live and it was amazing.  First, she buried my head in her bosom for 30 seconds that seemed like an eternity (in a good way ).  I wish it would never end.  Second, her breasts are quite soft and nice, like pillows.  Amazing I tell you, amazing!!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DruulEmpire on March 15, 2004, 07:11:56 AM
One could imagine her acing a test graded on the "curve" simply because no guy in the classroom could possibly concentrate on his own copy.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on March 15, 2004, 08:04:30 AM
About Chelsea's size decrease:

In one of her old newsletters she says her size differs from 135cm to 153cm. Translated to inches = 53.15 to 60.24 a difference of 7 inches from day to day.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on March 15, 2004, 03:44:03 PM
Chelsea may have had a slight decrease but it still works for me. On her slim frame she still looks huge. But as for her utter supremacy - Chelsea has been on the scene for about 5-6 years or so and she her size increased dramatically in a relative short period of time due to the string implants. Perish the thought but its only a matter or time before someone matches and surpasses her in bust size. Records are made to be broken I'm sure its very competitive among the superbusty in this business. For those of you who are remember Crystal Storm (who still has a page at Photoclubs) I remember when she was considered the biggest and someone here at the BEA probably has the vidclip of her on the Springer show taking a shower on stage. She appeared to astoundingly huge - I remember seeing it on E Talk soup in the early 90's when superbusty women seemed to be on these talk shows every week. Crystal is still hot in my book.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: hourglass on March 16, 2004, 12:49:33 AM
hey pixeltiger, don't you mean udder supremacy?  lol!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on March 16, 2004, 01:56:42 AM
I'm not saying that's obvious, but there are undiscovered tribes in the Amazon basin could have seen that coming.

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: rtpoe on March 16, 2004, 04:47:25 AM
Damn, he beat me to it. At least he'll be the one hit by tomatoes from RandomX.

rtpoe
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on March 16, 2004, 06:07:45 AM
Quote:

Damn, he beat me to it. At least he'll be the one hit by tomatoes from RandomX.

rtpoe  




If she comes back....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: hourglass on March 16, 2004, 12:58:53 PM
Quote:

Quote:

Damn, he beat me to it. At least he'll be the one hit by tomatoes from RandomX.

...if she comes back


yikes!  what happened?  Did she run off to the amazon basin?  lol She was my favorite person here....

If she comes back....  


Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on March 17, 2004, 12:14:27 AM
Any positive thread about Chelsea, we'll chime in....

-D&J  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 17, 2004, 03:36:12 AM
...as will I. Awesome. Every time I see her, I curse the FDA for stopping what might have been.

All hail our unique uber-boob-goddess!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: dreworx on March 17, 2004, 05:02:13 PM
any one see the supposed pre implant chelsea pic at joggs?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: g0ddmode on March 17, 2004, 06:29:51 PM
Could you please just post the picture itself, or a link to the picture? Or would that be violating some rule?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on March 17, 2004, 06:37:43 PM
Quote:

Could you please just post the picture itself, or a link to the picture? Or would that be violating some rule?  




The updated forum rules are posted here: http://forum.bearchive.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB1&Number=192627&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1 ...if any part of that is unclear to you, please feel free to PM a mod.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on March 17, 2004, 07:39:49 PM
I saw the pic which purported to be Chelsea pre implants. I think it was meant to be a gag, albeit not a very funny one. It certainly wasn't Chelsea.

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on March 17, 2004, 09:22:45 PM
I concur.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Chelsea74 on March 17, 2004, 09:31:36 PM
Did she really nude Pics before she had her Boobjob?I think these are only Morphs(Chelseas Head switch to an other Body)which ones on the Net!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Fool_in_the_Rain on March 17, 2004, 11:19:52 PM
that antes y despues site that i can't remember the url for had a lot of very good before and after pics, along with an early black and whit pic of chelsea without implants. her site had some pics of her with early implants, from before her huge score pictorals. an idea i've seen around would be a timeline of pictures or her, documenting her growth. mmm, growth, that'd be awesome. anyone want to look into it? oh, and if anyone finds the site or has it, please post, casue i can't find it anymore
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: dreworx on March 18, 2004, 02:47:07 AM
i'll post it but i'll have to edit it as the comparison picture is (i think) photoclubs.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: dreworx on March 18, 2004, 02:51:34 AM
here tis  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on March 18, 2004, 04:14:00 AM
Not Chelsea...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on March 18, 2004, 06:13:27 AM
hmmmph!  Not the Chelsea!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Fraction on March 18, 2004, 03:39:19 PM
http://www.guiadesupertetas.web1000.com/beforeafter/beforeafter.htm

While it doesn't have pre-implant Chelsea, it has pics of her with every set of implants since the first set.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Fool_in_the_Rain on March 18, 2004, 09:56:49 PM
oh, i guess those first pics were implants. they looked real since i remember her saying that she had natural D or DD cup breasts. still, isn't it amazing to look through the pictures and see how much she's grown. wow...
that's why she's one of the best
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 18, 2004, 11:10:23 PM
I saw that busty dusty pic before.. where did you people get it ????? who is the originator??? easiest way to see if its real would be to ask chelsea if you meet her or in email on her site... her looks sure are Dusty influenced sometimes.....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 19, 2004, 12:11:58 PM
the oldest implant pics (before they grow HUGE) I know of are the ones at kayla kleevage's paysite...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Penance on March 22, 2004, 02:18:15 PM
I recently saw a post about Chelsea Charms being in Minneapolis the 24th-25th, or something like that. Does anyone know the exact location/time or where I could find them? Would like to know ASAP. Thanks!

Penance
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DTM on March 23, 2004, 01:03:35 AM
SHe wrote me because I used to write her before she got to famous. Or maybe I'm just on her mailing list.
You should be able to go to her website and get her email.
I didn't save her letter.....sorry  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: buckeyesrule on March 26, 2004, 03:42:55 AM
I haven't been a member of Chelsea's photoclub site in over a year.  I remember seeing in this forum that the quality of the videos at Photoclubs has not improved.  Still though- these recent posts of Casey James have reminded me of how crazy I am for the super busty-in particular the CLOTHED super busty which allows for imagination.  Is it worth it?    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on March 26, 2004, 04:37:40 AM
Probably not, if you have to ask. I'm certainly too cheap to spend that much money on a girl I'm not **83** with.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UserInterface on March 26, 2004, 04:53:04 AM
Well put ggk.  I would rather buy her a drink.  Or at least take her to a movie with that $30.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Fool_in_the_Rain on March 26, 2004, 07:25:34 AM
well, that's aproxx 25 photosets you could see, if 30 bucks is worth it for you, do it, if not, then live without as you have been for a year. that's what i did
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Russ on March 26, 2004, 08:55:15 PM
her page is ok, but the videos at bosom-quest for 30 bucks are very shit.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 26, 2004, 11:52:30 PM
I like her official site best... photo as photclubs are ok. and BQ vids are not DVD quality, but EXPENSIVE
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jim31415 on March 27, 2004, 12:16:48 AM
Okay, if Chelsea's site isn't all that great, what is a good site to sign up for?  Is there a review of the busty model sites somewhere in this forum?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 27, 2004, 03:46:54 PM
I hear scoreland is pretty good value for money.. comment anyone?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 27, 2004, 03:49:13 PM
the thing I disliked most when I was photoclub member is they dont archive all stuff, but just very old ...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on March 27, 2004, 04:20:34 PM
What pay sites are you a member of now Hentaibee, and how do you like them?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on March 27, 2004, 05:12:08 PM
Chelsea is unique among the busty features out there for her unreal size and what she does to everyday clothing. I look forward to the twice monthly updates and sometimes they are disappointing but the biggest problem with photoclubs as was mentioned is that they dont rotate the archived sets where some of her best pics get lost never to be seen again.

As far as the price - Chelsea is probably their most popular model so if they can get the members they are charging whatever they can get.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: the_squirrel on March 27, 2004, 06:32:28 PM
In the short time I had a Chelsea Photoclubs membership a couple of years back, I downloaded everything in sight. Then I quit for a while, figuring a month someway down the line would let me get up to date.
Photoclubs policy has me beat - so to get all the sets I have to stay a member as I'm sure not going to d/l pics one by one from joggs gallery or wherever.
Can't fault their business plan - we have a choice and pay if we want to.
We can of course criticise their photography. I simply cannot conceive how they manage to take out-of-focus, wrongly exposed photos with modern equipment and expect people to pay to see them.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on March 27, 2004, 11:12:31 PM
The pictures are out of focus, and poorly exposed, and dammit, they don't give you enough of them? Sorry, it just sounded a little like the woody allen joke.

The food is terrible in this restaurant. Yes, and such small portions!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sonic_Morph on March 28, 2004, 02:52:12 AM
I have to say the best pay sites i've been a member of are Scoreland ( any of the models pages, LDM ,Chloe etc. ) and Keishas site......gotta love Keishas site.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on March 28, 2004, 05:27:09 AM
Not trying to be a pain in the ass, but I belong to Chelsea's Photoclub for the simple joy of seeing her every two weeks in a somewhat different set of poses. Yes, the quality of the photography lacks from time to time, but the quality of the subject never, ever lacks.
I myself can't wait for the 1st and the 15th to cum around.

Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ApesMa on March 28, 2004, 05:48:49 AM
Quote:

The food is terrible in this restaurant. Yes, and such small portions!  



Yeah...but here's my experience with Chelsea's Photoclubs site:

The photographer(s) they use know enough to make sure the photos are in focus. That's about it; they have no concept of lighting or composition. But, given the wonderful subject, and the sheer number of photos, a number of them turn out excellent. (Some of the photos of Chelsea in a maroon jumpsuit on a hardwood floor are forever burned into my memory.) Those are the ones we'd like more of. You'd think that Photoclubs would be making enough money to hire photographers at least halfway approaching competence.

Another irritant: they are very careless about making sure the file names of photos from different sessions don't clash.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: buckeyesrule on March 28, 2004, 07:21:59 AM
Thanks for all the feedback.  Am I understanding this correctly that now all videos are at bosomquest?  Photoclubs has no more videos?  People talk about the pictures mostly sucking for the money. How about the videos?  Have they improved at all?    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on March 28, 2004, 03:09:04 PM
"Not trying to be a pain in the ass"

Yes Ozzy, how dare you say something positive in a public forum. Shame on you!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: __sb__ on March 28, 2004, 04:15:20 PM
I agree with Davastav and Hentiabee. Just being as incredibly huge as Chelsea makes most pictures of her fantastic, but her archived pics are all the same (They never change). And that gets boring after a while. I like variety. It stimulates the imagination better, and there's more to look at. ROTATE THE ARCHIVES!!! Anyway, I'm not a member of her photoclub now for the reasons I've talked about. By the way, yes, photoclubs still has videos. They're ok. They're too short for me.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: boobifanX on March 28, 2004, 04:57:29 PM
Imho her site is not worthy to join. if you like Chelsea (and who does not?), join her photoclubs-site and you'll be better off.

Just my 2 ¢
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: steveo on March 28, 2004, 08:19:49 PM
I like Chelsea's official site too: http://www.chelseacharms.com
Nice thing about that site is, when you subscibe she gets the money, not like photo clubs, where those guys get the money and just pay her a modeling fee once or twice a year. Plus she has a couple of my morphs in her morph section... plug plug plug

Same as above for Keisha Evans site too, in case anyone was thinking about that. Based on what you have seen here, you should know already that she has high quality pics, plus she archives everything and has a bunch of vids at her personal site. http://www.keishaevans.com      
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on March 28, 2004, 08:46:25 PM
Steveo writes...
Quote:

I like Chelsea's official site too: http://www.chelseacharms.com
Nice thing about that site is, when you subscibe she gets the money,




The only problem with that theory, Stevo, is assuming you would get something in return.  Every second month IF you're lucky!  And the "bi monthly" newsletter hasn't been updated since November which contained news from last July!  At December 11th, she put up some extra out-take pictures at the bottom of it.

The videos are about 800K in total, down from a high of 8 to 10 megs and talk about boring???
Photoclubs is riveting compared to CC's own site.  So far she's lost at least a dozen members at $15 a pop per month that I know of.  That's about $180 per month...but some want to stay on just to support her.

But it ain't worth it.  She's got to do more for her fans and paying members, which is why she is NOTHING like Lady Keisha or Queen Sable.

Cheers
Whink
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: innocence on March 29, 2004, 05:11:33 PM
He breastlovers.
 
What is your favourite Chelsea Charms pic ???
 
I personally like pics when they look like i have taken the photo. Not these high quality shots. Just like ...
there is a girl in my neighboorhood I just taken a photo from ...
 
There is no girl like CC in my neighboorhood    
 
INNOCENCE, YOU HAVE NONE. AS THE SITE RULES PINNED TO THE TOP OF THIS VERY FORUM CLEARLY STATE, IMAGES OF THIS MODEL THAT ARE THE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF PHOTOCLUBS ARE EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR KNOWING AND ABIDING BY THE RULES OF THIS SITE *BEFORE* YOU POST ANYTHING AT ALL. BY PUTTING UP THE IMAGE YOU DID (WHICH I HAVE NOW REMOVED) YOU INVITE LEGAL REPERCUSSIONS FOR THIS SITE THAT JEAPORDIZE THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY. IF YOU CAN'T READ AND LIVE BY THE RULES, DON'T POST AT ALL.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on March 29, 2004, 05:16:07 PM
10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....


*poof*
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: tonedef on March 29, 2004, 06:42:40 PM
Nice photoclub pic. Don't post those.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UserInterface on March 29, 2004, 06:56:44 PM
ut oh... some one doesnt know the rules about photoclub.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jim31415 on March 29, 2004, 07:52:33 PM
Okay, so he didn't follow the rules.  The pic has been deleted, let's get back on topic.

My favorite Chelsea pic is the one of her in the red corset where she's holding a tape measure around her chest and you can clearly read 60 inches!

It seems that that's an old pic by now and she'd need a bigger tape measure these days!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Scotchman on March 29, 2004, 10:11:53 PM
Welcome to the BEA, Innocence.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on March 29, 2004, 11:36:50 PM
The set in the gold outfit. Anyone who's seen it knows what I am talking about. Awesome pic of an awesome lady.

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 29, 2004, 11:51:10 PM
photoclubs never updates their archive, **77** paying members to go out there and trade sets.....

... * no comment* ...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 29, 2004, 11:52:46 PM
my favourite is her video tape of the expo where she  ummm...*pleases herself like crazy* ...

:-D
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on March 30, 2004, 02:39:46 AM
She did a set with her multi-striped dress where she was posing in a doorway. My all-time favorite is a view from her rear, with her looking over her shoulder....the expanse of breast on either side.......oh-oh, lack of blood in the brain again.........
sigh

Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Variant on March 30, 2004, 03:54:52 AM
Hmm...generally my favorite pic is going to be one from her latest set.  I'm a sucker for size and since Chelsea is always growing, her newest pics are usually my favs.

She did do a set in a jeans jacket and sunglasses a while back that I really liked, though.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: t1ght on March 30, 2004, 05:24:42 AM
Hey guys, It's not my favorite, but I wish I could see it again.  It's a black shirt that's like XXXXL and it says "Keep Staring I Might Do A Trick".  I have seen shirts like this in my school, but when Chelsea wears it, it is awesome.  BTW, if it doesn't collide with forum rules and it is legal to post, please post it.  I know someone posted it in some thread a way long time ago.

Thanks  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on March 30, 2004, 07:16:34 AM
i have that pic but unfortunately is it a Chelsea Charm site pic so i cant post it here.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: tonedef on March 31, 2004, 04:49:43 AM
Favorite pics are the ones where chelsea is by a pool in a white bikini top and pink see through skirt.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MermetTheHermit on March 31, 2004, 05:56:06 AM
These kinda threads just aren't the same without the pics in question.  

Not that I'm complainin', O Holy Moderators On High, jus' sayin', y'know?...

But anyway - uhmm...  My favorite is the one where she's standing up and her naked breasts are down to her waist and wider than the span of her elbows - well, I guess that's really fifty or seventy pics, isn't it...  

Anything that shows off the size of her breasts at their fullest, I guess.  And you know, to see some more of her legs and butt is good too.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Old_Chestnut on March 31, 2004, 08:02:12 AM
I believe all of these are fan photos (mostly from 2000-01 -- someone here can probably tell me who the photographers were...), so I picked out my ten faves from those.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on March 31, 2004, 08:12:51 AM
My how that lil' girl has grown.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Sadistyk on March 31, 2004, 12:06:10 PM
Quote:

My how that lil' girl has grown.  




LOL...so true, so true.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jim31415 on April 01, 2004, 12:59:04 AM
It's too bad they don't all grow like her.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on April 01, 2004, 05:41:43 AM
i'm sure you all already know, but Chelsea updated her touring schedule... so see if you can get a chance for a private show near you!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on April 01, 2004, 06:40:33 PM
I'd like to thank Old_Chestnut for proving that there are still plenty of good postable Chelsea pix with which to illustrate posts (as if a prohibition on pix of her from one source spoiled everything!) and also for highlighting the use of the montage as a way to stay within the 1-1-1-1 rule (which is there of course to avoid the creation of add'l bans like the CC/Photoclubs one) AND finally for disproving the idea that montage/filesize limits would force all posted attachments to be small and unpleasant.

Well done Old_Chestnut!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Old_Chestnut on April 02, 2004, 01:22:26 AM
 from Palomine:
Quote:

 I'd like to thank Old_Chestnut for proving that there are still plenty of good postable Chelsea pix with which to illustrate posts


... just not an awful lot from the last couple years: the Yahoo!Clubs/Groups were getting a lot of Chelsea fan photos back in 2000-02, but the donations seemed to drop off a lot since then... (or was I looking in the wrong places?)
Quote:

 and also for highlighting the use of the montage as a way to stay within the 1-1-1-1 rule


   Yeah, I thought that was a pretty nice way to sleaze around the restriction...
Quote:

 AND finally for disproving the idea that montage/filesize limits would force all posted attachments to be small and unpleasant.


    I'm sometimes pretty surprised by how far 156.3K goes in .jpg format...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: innocence on April 02, 2004, 06:38:31 PM
Sorry for the copyright pic.

Next time I'll do it other.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 02, 2004, 08:09:50 PM
something different:
It's her private decision..but she has hot sex romps in her local swinger club...

Wish she would do more hot sex romps on camera... too sad...

anyway.. I'm talking about her latest newsletter. check out if you're a member of her official site..damn funny and hot.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Keisha_Evans on April 02, 2004, 09:04:30 PM
I like the pic of her outside in a big sweatshirt.  There's no way even in the huge shirt that she can hide her girth.  Now that's big!  

Keisha  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on April 02, 2004, 09:12:45 PM
I like those photos too!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RoosterBoy on April 06, 2004, 08:33:57 AM
Quote:

Not Chelsea...  




 Well it may not be Chelsea, but who is that lovely lady on the right?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Fool_in_the_Rain on April 06, 2004, 09:00:24 AM
dude, that's busty dusty! one of the first super-huge girls. in her later years it looks like. she's long reduced and retired, but one of the greats. she's got an archive site, bustydustystash.com look her up, there's tons to see
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: dreworx on April 07, 2004, 01:03:38 AM
that before after site referred me on elsewhere and gave me a virrus.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on April 07, 2004, 01:27:00 AM
Foolintherain, the "supposed Chelsea" is the other girl, not dusty.  I don't believe that is Chelsea with her.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on April 14, 2004, 07:25:29 PM
DVD is with Crystal Gunns.  I think she brings good things out of Chelsea!  Curious to see what this DVD has in store!
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zuraklo on April 14, 2004, 07:45:54 PM
MUST HAVE DVD o.O looks good  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: McAngus on April 14, 2004, 08:32:16 PM
The Chelsea caps gave me a start, but I guess since they're not from Photoclubs you're good to go!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on April 14, 2004, 09:01:48 PM
The VidCaps are from her preview vid which can be downloaded for free from her website.  I assume that makes posting OK.  And there is only 1 photo (rules ).    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Nicklaus_Vlad on April 15, 2004, 03:12:20 AM
For a moment I thought that was a real penis.

What a cocktease.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on April 15, 2004, 08:27:24 AM
Either that's a very small dildo or CC has very large breasts.

What am I saying!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on April 15, 2004, 09:41:13 AM
i bet even a loaf of french bread would get lost in there...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 15, 2004, 06:03:36 PM
as I said in previous thread.. ordered ... hehehe
will take some more days coz I paid cash from europe..
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on April 15, 2004, 09:27:55 PM
Quote:

i bet even a loaf of french bread would get lost in there...    




Wow! A whole loaf of french bread. I think you're right.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on April 16, 2004, 07:06:34 AM
In a one word review........HOLYFUCKINGMEOWTHISDVDISCOOL. A detailed review shall follow after I recover.

Ozzy  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on April 16, 2004, 09:48:41 AM
ooh, i can't wait! i want to hear some reviews before i can shell out 40 bucks for 30 minutes...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: __sb__ on April 16, 2004, 04:32:35 PM
I bought it and watched it. I don't want to disappoint anybody, but I was disappointed, again. The camera angles sucked. You could barely even see either of the two women. The camera seemed to veer everywhere but what you wanted it (on the chics). It barely showed ANY of Chelsea at all. Now, I will say, it showed a lot of Crystal Gunns, and I had no idea she was so fucking hot. Not a lot of that though. If I knew the content I was getting (for $40!- damn, that's high), I definitely wouldn't have gotten it. Sorry to disappoint people. That's my take on it. -Nothing personal over the two girls and all. I'm sure they're nice.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ac man on April 16, 2004, 04:39:27 PM
got mine in the mail today, will give a review later, hope im not dissapointed.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: H_man on April 17, 2004, 07:38:17 AM
Quote:

got mine in the mail today, will give a review later, hope im not dissapointed.    




Sounds like Chelsea's mail order service is getting better. Hopefully, I'll have my copy next week.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on April 19, 2004, 05:47:35 PM
Any other reviews of "Too Hot To Handle" featuring the-too-huge-to-handle-with-one-hand Chelsea Charms and Crystal Gunns?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on April 22, 2004, 03:48:06 AM
Bumpin back to the front (See above post)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ozzy on April 22, 2004, 06:40:20 AM
What to talk about first?

The down side? God, I wish they'd toss the canned muzak and leave the vid-cams to record the giggles, grunts, and moans. Having said that, the clothes fitting portion is kinda neat.

The Toy Time Portion of this DVD is heart stopping. Chelsea exhibits a true talent here. Yummy.

I think it was very much so worth the money.

Ozzy

P.S. Then again, anyone that has ever seen my posting might figure I was addicted to her.........    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on April 22, 2004, 10:15:09 PM
So did Chelsea have enough air time? I like Crystal Gunns too but after you've seen Chelsea, to have anything smaller is like being downsized. Hope that's not mean.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 22, 2004, 10:21:29 PM
Quote:

What to talk about first?

The down side? God, I wish they'd toss the canned muzak and leave the vid-cams to record the giggles, grunts, and moans. Having said that, the clothes fitting portion is kinda neat.

The Toy Time Portion of this DVD is heart stopping. Chelsea exhibits a true talent here. Yummy.

I think it was very much so worth the money.

Ozzy

P.S. Then again, anyone that has ever seen my posting might figure I was addicted to her.........    




Sounds great..still waiting for it...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on April 23, 2004, 12:41:35 AM
Quote:

So did Chelsea have enough air time? I like Crystal Gunns too but after you've seen Chelsea, to have anything smaller is like being downsized. Hope that's not mean.  


I know what you mean. Fine as Crystal is, practically any woman is going to find herself eclipsed by the sheer size of the magnificent Miss Charms.

At least to boob fiends like us

Pixeltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: H_man on April 23, 2004, 08:10:39 AM
Just got my copy today. I agree that the music, nice though it is, is distracting. The screams and giggles during the pillow fight sequence would be worth the cost of admission alone! They look like they were having a blast. Crystal is definitely overshadowed by Chelsea size-wise. But, if you look objectively, Crystal is no slouch in the titty department.

The clothes trying on sequence is awesome. Is it just me, or are some of Crystal's outfits the same ones that Chelsea squeezed into in   'Changing Chelsea'? Crystal fills them out quite nicely. And watching the two of them tug stretchy tops over Chelsea's mountains is awe-inspiring.

That said, the footage on this DVD is over a year old. Chelsea still has her long hair and, of course, she's much bigger now.

My only complaint? It's too short!  (It runs about 37 minutes) Needs to be four or five hours long at least.
But if she released a new one every four to six weeks, this length would be fine.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 23, 2004, 02:36:01 PM
I got mine, and yeah. music is distracting....
but overall the disc is worth the money for die-hard chelsea fans (^_^)I'm watching toy time over and over and over...lol.......my cum-level is getting too low. lol
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: The_L on April 23, 2004, 11:51:32 PM
Chelsea's videos suck. All of em.....they always suck....and they always will....until she learns what to do in her footage.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on April 24, 2004, 12:01:42 AM
So Hentaibee and H_Man, did Chelsea have enough air time? Both videos put together are 37 minutes long? You can't be serious.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 24, 2004, 02:13:42 PM
Quote:

Chelsea's videos suck. All of em.....they always suck....and they always will....until she learns what to do in her footage.
 




well, I agree...but7also ehr vids arent that bad if you're a chelsea afficionado (^_^;;) ... BTW her fanfair masturbation bonus video is pretty nice IMHO...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: H_man on April 25, 2004, 05:08:26 AM
Well, I checked again and it appears I was a little generous on the running time of the DVD. It actually runs 33 minutes and 28 seconds. Yes, that's both parts together. Chelsea is on-screen for all but two or three minutes. But, if that's too much, you can always order the same DVD from Crystal's site. You get the same thing except Crystal stars in the toy segment at the end instead of Chelsea.

Still, I think it's worth it for the die-hard Chelsea fan. I'm not demanding a refund, that's for sure! I enjoyed it tremendously.

Now if she'd just reissue all of her videos on DVD's.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: peschi on April 25, 2004, 04:37:38 PM
wow, only three (3) minutes screentime in a total of 33 minutes, that's not much.

So it's more a Crystal video then.

I'll pass on this one then.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on April 25, 2004, 06:49:48 PM
Nah Peschi, I think he's saying that Chelsea is on screen the entire time except for two or three minutes. "For ALL but 2-3 minutes." Hey, what are you doing with that bat?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RoosterBoy on April 25, 2004, 07:54:33 PM
Anything with Chelsea Charms looks intreasting to me. But I think I'll wait until this one goes in the sale bin. But then if you get 'Toy Time' with it, then maybe it is worth it to buy it now.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zulluh on April 25, 2004, 09:29:03 PM
Chelsea's DVD! Hey, i got a copy (RW) of a Chelsea's
 old video, where she's washing a car for almost 20 min( ) She's dressing a white t-shirt and a tiny short..  
 Somebody can help me - what's the original title of this
 video?
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Boobychaserxxx on April 26, 2004, 05:05:06 AM
have you guys seen this one? It's over at Kayla Kleevage's Site. Looks to be better but I have not seen it YET!
http://www.kaylakleevage.com/updates/initiationofchelsea.htm


BC  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: __sb__ on April 26, 2004, 02:44:53 PM
zulluh, I think what you're talking about is a Bosomquest video of hers (bosomquest.com).
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zulluh on April 27, 2004, 02:07:47 AM
Quote:

zulluh, I think what you're talking about is a Bosomquest video of hers (bosomquest.com).  




Ohh, yes, _sb_! Thanx!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: H_man on April 27, 2004, 05:27:52 AM
Quote:

have you guys seen this one? It's over at Kayla Kleevage's Site. Looks to be better but I have not seen it YET!
http://www.kaylakleevage.com/updates/initiationofchelsea.htm


BC    




That an old one, I think. That was shot right after Chelsea got her silly-string boobs and before they started their epic growth. Kayla was helping Chelsea get started in the  feature biz. They had a parting of the ways shortly after that.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 27, 2004, 07:08:47 PM
yeah, they announced more to come in the 'introducing chelsea'video ending credits.... but they split ways all too soon (^_^;;;)..
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 27, 2004, 07:11:35 PM
Quote:

Anything with Chelsea Charms looks intreasting to me. But I think I'll wait until this one goes in the sale bin. But then if you get 'Toy Time' with it, then maybe it is worth it to buy it now.    




if you wanna see ehr masturbate..I'd rather recommend one of the fanfair tapes... in one of them she has hell of a masturbation scene.....

the toytime on the new dvd is 'just' a simulated titfuck with a rubber dick (pumping out lotion...LMAO)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RoosterBoy on April 30, 2004, 06:44:13 AM
hhmmm Hentaibee thanks for clueing me in on that. Maybe I'll look into the fan fair ones, but actually I think Chelsea Charms is pretty hot no matter what she is doing.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on April 30, 2004, 01:48:31 PM
Roosterboy writes...
Quote:

I think Chelsea Charms is pretty hot no matter what...



She is hot, no matter what, she's cute...she's gorgeous.  Hell, let's be honest, besides the boobs she's one of the most beautiful women on the planet.  

This is not a stretch, she really is that beautiful.

BUT SHE MAKES THE MOST BORING VIDEOS~!!!!!  Oh God, the humanity, she's almost as bad as young Christina.

But once again, man is she ever beautiful.  I could star into her eyes for hours and despite the boobs, have a hard time breaking eye contact.  (swoon)

Whink
  Those Eyes
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: __sb__ on April 30, 2004, 03:25:52 PM
I'm with whink on this one also. The woman (Chelsea) is like a dream (her boobs mainly). Now if she could just translate her huge boobs into a good teasing video.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on May 01, 2004, 03:34:10 AM
is she under an exclusive contract with certain photographers or something? couldn't she easily find better people to work with?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch on May 01, 2004, 05:37:46 AM
_sb_ and JT are right. It's not that hard.

All it would take is a bottle of baby oil, a private swimming pool, 3 stage costumes, and a stage. A flat bed truck would be great!

Why the swimming pool? I know they float - just haven't seen it lately.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on May 02, 2004, 03:08:21 PM
Not Bad , huh?
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: bignatslover on May 02, 2004, 05:36:02 PM
I think the boobs might be too small.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on May 02, 2004, 07:09:01 PM
Excellent work, as always, Hentaibee.  I'm a fan of your work in a genre I normally don't like!

Whink out
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hiram on June 07, 2004, 02:26:43 PM
What sort of implants does Chelsea Charms have – are they the string type?

They are a bit of an odd shape to be honest.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BazBear on June 07, 2004, 05:25:40 PM
Quote:

What sort of implants does Chelsea Charms have – are they the string type?

They are a bit of an odd shape to be honest.
   



Yes, they're the string type. If you do a forum search, you'll find all manner of posts on Chelsea and her implants.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hoogleboogle on June 07, 2004, 05:30:08 PM
Ahem.

A bit odd? You think they look a  bit odd?
Dude, her nipples are on the sides of her boobs.

That's not odd. That's mutant.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on June 07, 2004, 05:35:42 PM
Yes, that explains why she is the most popular big boob model of all time. She is one hot mutant!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rad on June 07, 2004, 05:38:20 PM
She FINALLY updated her photo page on her website. She has a preview of an outfit she is going to wear to the Fan Fair in Vegas! She looks HOT in the outfit, a see through outfit!
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rad on June 07, 2004, 05:41:39 PM
PS, she also updated her photoclubs preview with a new video and a few photos also.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hiram on June 07, 2004, 06:42:05 PM
Quote:


If you do a forum search, you'll find all manner of posts on Chelsea and her implants.  




Yeah, I should have done that I know.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hiram on June 07, 2004, 06:44:46 PM
Quote:



That's not odd. That's mutant.    




I'd still shag her.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hiram on June 07, 2004, 06:46:11 PM
Quote:

Yes, that explains why she is the most popular big boob model of all time. She is one hot mutant!  




Can you substantiate that statement?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 07, 2004, 07:27:04 PM
Quote:

Yes, that explains why she is the most popular big boob model of all time. She is one hot mutant!  




agreed
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 07, 2004, 07:28:19 PM
her best outfit in ages.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on June 08, 2004, 01:30:56 AM
Indeed.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RoosterBoy on June 08, 2004, 02:03:21 AM
I always thought Chelsea was hot, sure wouldn't mind being with her at all.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on June 08, 2004, 04:46:38 PM
Chelsea is wonderful. A lovely lady with a breath-taking physique. We are lucky to live in an age where ladies like her and Maxi mounds , Minka, Melonie Charm, Rhiannon etc exist.

Pixltiger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hoogleboogle on June 08, 2004, 04:47:18 PM
I think girls like Chelsea look better with their shirts on.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: M Riza on June 08, 2004, 05:01:45 PM
"I think girls like Chelsea look better with their shirts on. "

I always thought that growing up about real breasts. I remember when i was young seeing women look so hot  with their big breasts in tight shirts. Then they'd take them off and the same boobs would just flop down to their stomach - the perkiness was lost when they took off their bras.

I think this is why i love silicone so much. They just stay in the same perky state that attracts me when they are still in clothing.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hiram on June 08, 2004, 09:02:26 PM
Quote:


I always thought that growing up about real breasts. I remember when i was young seeing women look so hot  with their big breasts in tight shirts. Then they'd take them off and the same boobs would just flop down to their stomach - the perkiness was lost when they took off their bras.
 




I think you've totally hit the hammer on the head here, this is why I like the fakies too, it the way they just stay put, without a bra to hold them that way.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: HarbleWom on June 09, 2004, 01:41:55 AM
Personally, I like clothed breasts better as well, but natural or implanted doesn't matter all too much to me. I guess my main thing is that I like cleavage, and that just tends to happen more often when the woman is wearing some clothes than none at all. I also prefer breasts to be on the softer side, which leans toward natural....

I've never felt Chelsea's breasts, but I know they look awesome in bras and tight clothes, and sometimes there's a little bit of spillage, which leads me to believe they're not rock solid, which for me is a plus.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 09, 2004, 02:21:55 PM
I've given her something in return for the wonderful performance on her DVD.

http://www.chelseacharms.com/fanfotospage.html

(^_^) She's damn fast with putting up new fan stuff.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on June 09, 2004, 09:15:59 PM
Hey!!....there are two pictures of Jane on that page  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 13, 2004, 08:15:49 PM
Was wondering if anyone knows what Chelsea Charms is up to lately.  Has anyone seen her live lately?  Is she still growing?  It doesn't seem like she tours as much as she used to.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 13, 2004, 09:33:46 PM
she doesnt tour currenlty. making too much money and travels with private dances and video sales....since I'm not in USA.. I'll just ask for custom pics /vid (......or..........win the lottery and make my own chelsea movie... heheeheh)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on June 14, 2004, 02:07:25 AM
I'd say she's up to about a 170ZZZ cup. Ah man, that was too easy. Nah hopeFULLy she up to sending my DVD to me. I haven't had the pleasure of seeing her moving around on film since Changing Chelsea, and she was Gimoungous then! That vid was made in 2000 I think, so it being 2004, she is most likely double the size she was then, or damn near.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Wolfman1066 on June 14, 2004, 06:44:16 AM
I heard she'd gotten married, or at least engaged. In her most recent video she was spotted sporting a ring on the required finger.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Implator on June 14, 2004, 08:46:43 AM
She's married ???    


Ok, I think she's spending a lot of time in building her house.


Anybody knows, whats the cost to make your own custom video with her ???  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 14, 2004, 12:15:23 PM
I asked but no reply yet . She may be busy...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 14, 2004, 12:17:05 PM
engaged? interesting.. ya konw. some people wear rings as beauty item...

anyhow.. she should talk her fiancee into a hardcore dvd  . LMAO
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 14, 2004, 05:39:46 PM
"Sorry I don't do custom vids or digital pics. Lots of love, Chelsea"

crap. too bad....

I'll just have to get her regular stuff... or fly to usa.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on June 14, 2004, 06:12:23 PM
I met up with Chelsea recently for a "private dance."   There was no sign of a ring on her finger.

By the way, she is even more gorgeous in person and her boobs probably make up at least 30% of her bodyweight.  Chelsea is a very petite woman.  She is the ideal busty model fantasy with her tiny bod and ridiculously HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE rack.  

Lastly, she beat the crap out of me with her tits -- my face was crushed in her deep cleavage while she smacked me violently for over 10 minutes during our 1/2 hour meeting in her hotel room.

She does NOT offer a "full menu"  :-(  but it was an awesome time regardless..........  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 14, 2004, 06:20:44 PM
"No, I'm not engaged. I sometimes wear my mothers wedding ring from my
father, but I don't wear it on the engagement/wedding finger. Chelsea"

:-)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on June 14, 2004, 06:43:25 PM
*Passing GoCubsGo some extra strength Excedrin* You might need these more than me. Lol.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 17, 2004, 01:46:26 PM
just read some posts from chelsea's enthousiastic other fans (like big ed) at her msg board....

damn , I have to save for a trip to the USA :-)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on July 22, 2004, 03:07:45 PM
I hope this means that there will be more frequent updates........

new stuff coming soon!

(posted by Chelsea Charms at chelseacharms.com on July 15, 2004)

Message:

"Hi everyone! I wanted to let you know what we have planned. We thought it would be best to post the new update at the time we put up the new site, since it would create more work posting it on both sites. The new site will go up Friday the 23rd, so the site might be down for a short time on Wednesday or Thursday in preperation for the new site. There will be some new features at the new site, including a monthly update featuring a friend in the business.Since you've been waiting for my update, we'll be posting a bonus, at the time the new site goes up, there will be a photo update, video update, and chapter update. I hope you all enjoy! Thank you for your patience and support.

Lots of love, Chelsea"  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on July 22, 2004, 03:10:30 PM
old news for fans :-PPP
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on July 23, 2004, 01:18:04 PM
new pics and vid clip.  Chelsea looks absolutely breathtaking in her tight red top.  Her tits are stretching the fabric to the max !!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on July 24, 2004, 05:45:36 AM
I used to be a member of Chelsea's homepage (with very short interruption due to credit card change from April 2002), but I quit 3 weeks ago.
I can't believe that there will be more frequent updates, because all complaints from a lot of members where plainly ignored. What sense has a newsletter from Nov.-Dez. 2003 in beginning-mid July 2004? Why did she tell by Nov.-Dez. last year that she wants to rebuild her webpage soon. Now is end of July. baaah.
First she tells how busy she is with travelling and house construction, bla bla bla. Then she even has the nerve to tell her fans on her message board on weekend of July, 4th that she hung out with her friends. But no real updates (only shit) for ages. If she makes her money with private dances. Fine. When running her webpage isn't much to earn then she should really think to stop it instead of cheating her members.

She has lost me as an member for now and ever. Instead I'm a member of Milena Velba homepage and a happy member of Keisha Evans.

andrat2000  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on July 24, 2004, 08:39:03 AM
I take it that you want material for the money. but for m her side of the equation, so to speak, the website is more like a promo thing.and the dances is what makes her the big money...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on July 24, 2004, 10:25:32 AM
Quote:

I take it that you want material for the money. but for m her side of the equation, so to speak, the website is more like a promo thing.and the dances is what makes her the big money...  




So do you think she sees her site as an promo only site? If you think so I will agree to you. But she should really have the courage to say it to her members: "Sorry guys, I have the largest artifical breasts so I can really charge you 9,95/14,95 $ the month even you get poor content updates and an announced layout change of my homepage might take 3/4 of a year."

andrat2000  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on July 24, 2004, 11:14:26 AM
well... hmm. I jsut think she hasnt yet discovered a good way to make money with her site... (jsut loo kat the lots and lots of videos of girls like maxi mounds in their sites shops)

doing more offline than online and selling out to capitalists like PC(and BQ, fot that matter) is her own choice...

I'm fine with whatever she chooses. its HER boobs, after all

And I think for such a low fee we can clap happily in our hands if we see any updates :-P

And , btw its all jsut a matter of which model you like best...if milena flaots your boat, well jsut join her... (htis goes for any model, of course..)

I usually join 1 - 3 sites and trade the stuff they got for other sites.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: psowden on July 24, 2004, 02:36:38 PM
It all comes down to preference.
I think Chelsea is amazing so I'm a member of her site.  It would be great to have more updates and I would really like to see the last few editions of her chapters put into the archive so i can re read them, but I like Chelsea so I put up with it.
She's also not the only model who doesn't currently update regularly.  Lisa Lipps is my fav all time model, however in the past couple of years she has hardly updated her site at all.  She has a lot more content than Chelsea, but there han;t ben anything new in about a year
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on July 24, 2004, 03:15:38 PM
some of the text in the new chapter is copied from the xmas chapter because there were same activities...

but I can forgive such wonderful models anything
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on August 04, 2004, 03:40:30 PM
http://www.chelseacharms.com/freepic.html  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on August 05, 2004, 07:18:07 PM
Quote:

http://www.chelseacharms.com/freepic.html  




And? This is a weekly free pic. Tomorrow it will be 2 weeks old! New look of the page but customer care nada.    

Oh I forgot I'm no customer anymore.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: NeoMyztikX on August 05, 2004, 08:51:06 PM
 
shes getting bigger  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on August 05, 2004, 09:19:46 PM
Quote:

Oh I forgot I'm no customer anymore.    




Neither am I.  Neither are dozens of others...

I don't think they quite get this whole problem we have with "money for nothing" or maybe better stated as "nothing in return for the money"!!!

CHEERS, Andrat, And you and I used to be two of her biggest supporters.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on August 07, 2004, 09:03:41 PM
Hello all,

I thought to create a poll about chelseacharms.com membership. What I wanted to know is how many people are still members and satisfied with the update and content. How many have quit due to lack of updates. Are there any members that quit because of the content. And how many did quit apart from the reasons above?
This poll could be a good and interesting marketing help for Chelsea (when she is interested at all) and for all other models. On the other hand I don't want to hurt her business and herself too much.

What do you think?

Bye,
andrat2000
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on August 07, 2004, 09:13:17 PM
Quote:

Hello all,

I thought to create a poll about chelseacharms.com membership. What I wanted to know is how many people are still members and satisfied with the update and content. How many have quit due to lack of updates. Are there any members that quit because of the content. And how many did quit apart from the reasons above?
This poll could be a good and interesting marketing help for Chelsea (when she is interested at all) and for all other models. On the other hand I don't want to hurt her too much.

What do you think?

Bye,
andrat2000  




I think that is a great idea!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on August 07, 2004, 10:02:23 PM
I joined for first time after site revamp...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Breasts on August 07, 2004, 11:07:33 PM
I joined her site for the first time about 13 months ago when I finally got Net access of my own, I was so excited about joining the website of the model with the biggest boobs in the buisiness but reality cut in when updates failed to appear and I cancelled my membership. I rejoined again recently in the hope that something may have changed in the update dept but of course it hadn't so I cancelled once again I don't think I'll bother joining again much as I love Chelsea's huge boobs.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on August 07, 2004, 11:38:55 PM
reality has alot of disapointments. that is one of them...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on August 07, 2004, 11:42:05 PM
UNFORTUNATELY YU ARE 100& CORRECT.  I thought the who point of Chelsea was Fantasy though?

Fantasy is not supposed to be harsh reality.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BarneyFife on August 08, 2004, 12:17:53 AM
As a long time fan of Chelsea I have also been bothered at her site why updates are infrequent and despite many attempts on fans telling her to update the site politely there requests have been ignored.I have remained a member hoping that she changes her ways and give it one more try to see if she has changed. Other sites like Milena Velba's,Nadine Jansen's update frequently making it enjoyable.I think Chelsea uses her website mostly to inform fans of her schedule since that is her bread and butter.The rest of the content she could careless but I hope with her revamped site she will update more frequently.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on August 15, 2004, 08:13:53 PM
Has anyone seen Chelsea live lately?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on August 15, 2004, 11:22:53 PM
? she only does privates currently.

hmm. I still need to save for the airplane
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: mister_mystery on August 16, 2004, 01:03:45 AM
What is she up to?
About 12,000 feet with the amount of helium she must be storing in those dirigibles.
M?M  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on August 16, 2004, 01:17:14 AM
Quote:

What is she up to?
About 12,000 feet with the amount of helium she must be storing in those dirigibles.
M?M  




actually funny.... but for balloons..you should go to farang dingdong
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Craig_Mercer on August 17, 2004, 10:10:16 AM
I noticed that Chelsea's private dance schedule puts her in my area for the current 48 hours. But lacking the 200 bucks for the half hour advance we probably won't be meeting, if only I could get a passing, fleeting sighting.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: thiskids on August 17, 2004, 10:16:20 AM
I think about basketball size!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Thedoctor on August 17, 2004, 11:56:27 PM
I know man who know her. she has husband. he let her do this to make money.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on August 18, 2004, 12:02:45 AM
Quote:

I know man who know her. she has husband. he let her do this to make money.




can u back this claim?

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: toomuch on August 18, 2004, 01:45:20 AM
I recall reading, a long time ago, that Chelsea was married even before she started modeling.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on August 27, 2004, 11:58:11 AM
Quote:

Quote:

http://www.chelseacharms.com/freepic.html  




And? This is a weekly free pic. Tomorrow it will be 2 weeks old! New look of the page but customer care nada.    

Oh I forgot I'm no customer anymore.    







We missed the monthly jubilee of the weekly free pic? At least it was announced as this.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ac man on August 27, 2004, 02:42:11 PM
thats one thing great about maxi mounds site, her weekly free pic is updated every week, like clockwork. and her member site is updated as well.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on August 28, 2004, 05:47:33 PM
hmm. looks liek the update frequency raised a bit
they jsut posted some good xtra pics from the bonus scene on the dvd on the site...

I know its from 2003. but any unpublished stuff is good with me

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: breastrespect1 on September 06, 2004, 05:30:02 PM
Anybody, (crazyJose this is you!!!) who has any more pics of Chelsea from Vegas last week, please post them, I need to see more of her next to other girls...she makes everyone else look tiny!!! PLEASE POST MORE!!! Thanks  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on September 06, 2004, 08:22:06 PM
I think this should be the official thread for Chelsea pics from the expo!  I did notice that Crazyjose has a gallery of conventions on the main BEA page but is so far empty.  Unleash the fury!    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 06, 2004, 09:13:58 PM
hmm. I'm pretty sure jose wil have some nice ones... and lucas at the fan yahoo club posted 2 small ones...

I bet her official site will have some pics..but not soon.
hmmm... and maybe some other people took some snaps...
...seems no one usese techy equipment these days...

..lol. I'd go there with a high tech photocamera and slap up 1600*1200 pixel snaps. lol....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on September 06, 2004, 10:07:05 PM
Sorry for the delay guys but family and school have delayed me. The first set of 30 pictures are posted now and more to come. Chelsea came later and will be in the last set.  
Meanwhile I attached a bigger picture for the mean time.
Enjoy
Crazyjose  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 06, 2004, 10:19:27 PM
Quote:

Sorry for the delay guys but family and school have delayed me. The first set of 30 pictures are posted now and more to come.  




30 ?? where?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on September 06, 2004, 10:53:02 PM
Here in the BoobBrothers Scarpbook gallery.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: lars573 on September 06, 2004, 11:23:55 PM
Quote:

Here in the BoobBrothers Scarpbook gallery.  




And this is where?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on September 07, 2004, 12:51:53 AM
Here in BEArchives and  here is the link to the web page.  It is part of the members gallery.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on September 07, 2004, 02:13:38 AM
CrazyJose, don't you have a Yahoo group too?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on September 07, 2004, 03:00:35 AM
 Yes and here is the link to the BoobBrothers Yahoo group web page.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rad on September 07, 2004, 03:36:04 AM
THANKS JOSE! You are the BOMB! Chelsea is HUGE! I can't believe how big she is!!!!! THANKS AGAIN!!! ANYMORE PICS OF HER????
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tobe on September 07, 2004, 05:40:12 AM
maybe I am stupid, but: how to view full size images in yahoo group.  image is screen size, but I can't see full size.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on September 07, 2004, 09:51:59 AM
Quote:

maybe I am stupid, but: how to view full size images in yahoo group.  image is screen size, but I can't see full size.  




Nobody can't see them full size. They resize the pictures to a smaller size. I guess they do it to save bandwith and diskspace. The only solution on Yahoo groups is to own webspace somewhere else and then post the links in the gallery section. Or you zip the pictures and upload them into the files sections.

bye,
andrat2000
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on September 07, 2004, 05:11:44 PM
These eBay pics might be from last week:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=14280&item=6925249480&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=14280&item=6925249660&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 07, 2004, 05:55:40 PM
morons..... why the heck do they sell them on ebay.
it's like ripping her off.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: bfoss100 on September 07, 2004, 06:06:48 PM
I de-lurk after years because of her ...The blue cocktail dress photo of her by herself are the most fantastic looking photo of a women I’ve ever seen….there is nothing I love more then a seeing in “everyday” real world setting …I would rather have one hour of fine dining and conversation an a 5 star restaurant with here dressed to the nines like that then hours of a private dance anytime…. There just something about being a gentleman in public with a women that’s just stunning, that stands out and dominates the room

I seen Chelsea dance it was fantastic but my favorite thing was bumping in to outside before the show in her street dresses    

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on September 07, 2004, 08:57:57 PM
bfoss100,  your avatar of Chelsea is awesome !!  Where did you find this pic of her in the blue cocktail dress ?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: bfoss100 on September 07, 2004, 09:18:20 PM
It's from Crazyjose site...http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boobbrothers/  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: breastrespect1 on September 07, 2004, 09:20:41 PM
Wow!!! The photos that are from Ebay in that colorful dress are unbelievable!!! I have never seen anything like that, the one where she is leaning down is awesome!! Anyone have any guess as to how many inches around she is now , must be at least 80". If anyone has anymore, please post them. Or if your psoting them somewhere else, please tell us where!!! i can't wait to see more, she is unreal ( but whats incredible is that she is real!!!)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Mazza44 on September 07, 2004, 09:39:36 PM

What's her website like these days, it was rubbish when I was last a member about 6 months ago. Does she actually update anything yet?

I want to rejoin as those are some massive tits!!! But I've got a feeling not much will be different.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Cumquat on September 08, 2004, 03:08:29 AM
Do any of you guys work for a living or do you spend all your time online downloading and uploading stolen pictures of all these women so you can pass them out to all they people who don't want to pay for anything or join the sites?
Maybe Chelsea and some of the other girls would like some of you freeloaders to join their websites so they can make a living too.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on September 08, 2004, 03:20:17 AM
Normally I would agree with you Cumquat, but in this particular instance the pictures in question are taken by fans, and actually encouraged, they are not property of the models....but that being said, your basic premise is sound...stolen images from the internet has all but destroyed live performances by these models...no idea how to fix it either...but its definately broken.

-D  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: taco on September 08, 2004, 03:21:49 AM
Maybe someone took a picture of her at a convention.  That makes it their property, and they can do whatever they feel like doing with it inside the bounds of legality.  Most stars charge money for a picture to be taken, especially at appearances.  They do this to make money.  It's just as reasonable for the person who took the photo to sell it for money.  It's not illegal or unethical.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick Biggerstaff on September 08, 2004, 03:48:04 AM
The only time a photographer has publication rights is when the model or company signs a release form and grants the photographer that permission. The form will specify what the pictures are to be used for and the monetary percentage for the model as well as the photographer.
Taking pictures for personal use is one thing but posting them on the web is both illegal and unethical without the written permission.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on September 08, 2004, 04:25:10 AM
Sorry but here is my two cents.
Would you like me to stop posting my pictures and close my gallery?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick Biggerstaff on September 08, 2004, 05:29:43 AM
Being Sable Holiday's photographer, I suppose I could post all her pictures all over the web if I wanted to, but being a professional, just because I took the photos doesn't give me the right to do whatever I want with them. I still need to have her permission. That's being legal and ethical. But I can only speak for myself and my own actions.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: taco on September 08, 2004, 05:57:36 AM
So does that mean this entire site should be shut down except for galleries of individual models who give permission to be morphed and are paid for every view of the picture?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ample1 on September 08, 2004, 06:28:42 AM
um technically -yes.... lets hope it doesnt come to that. My private stash of BEA pics may be pricless when it all dries up....  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on September 08, 2004, 09:09:34 AM
Quote:

So does that mean this entire site should be shut down except for galleries of individual models who give permission to be morphed and are paid for every view of the picture?  




If you look at chelsea's fanfotos page
http://www.chelseacharms.com/fanfotos.html
than you can see that she askes for permission to post them. Certainly she also denies to post pictures the fan doesn't have the copyright. I don't know if this only is applicable to morphs or also to pictures taken on conventions.

Just my idea:
If you want to resolve this whole trouble ask cubeman and Chelsea to release the convention pictures to her fanfoto page.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 08, 2004, 01:16:19 PM
Quote:

Do any of you guys work for a living or do you spend all your time online downloading and uploading stolen pictures of all these women so you can pass them out to all they people who don't want to pay for anything or join the sites?
Maybe Chelsea and some of the other girls would like some of you freeloaders to join their websites so they can make a living too.    



what the fuck ? I know you mean the best for the girls, but HELLOOOOOOO ! these here are FAN fotos...
lol..... they are not to be sold (like those ebay things).. but you can spread them freely. ...

anyone who want HIGH quality stuff can join the sites anyway

see it as a sort of additional mouh-to-mouth advertising

the dudes at her fanclub even post the polaroids they take with her for some dollars when she is at clubs for a meet n greet after a show. lol.

Its got absolutely nothing to do with ripping off anyone.

selling on ebay is a diffrent story, though.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Cumquat on September 08, 2004, 04:07:12 PM
Some people try to find an excuse for everything they do, but it still doesn't make it right.
Look what happened to NAPSTER. These women are artists and entertainers just like the musicians.
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jscott991 on September 08, 2004, 04:24:16 PM
I'm a tax attorney and not a first amendment or copyright attorney, but this is the most blatantly wrong statement of the law I've ever heard!

If this were true, newspapers would have to pay models, **28**, politicians, etc. every time they took their picture and put it in the newspaper!  Do you think the photos on the cover of a magazine are generating royalties for Bush every time he appears!?

For goodness sakes people, exercise some common sense.

Quote:

The only time a photographer has publication rights is when the model or company signs a release form and grants the photographer that permission. The form will specify what the pictures are to be used for and the monetary percentage for the model as well as the photographer.
Taking pictures for personal use is one thing but posting them on the web is both illegal and unethical without the written permission.    


Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Cumquat on September 08, 2004, 04:58:51 PM
The newspapers and magazines, I'm sure, have the persons permission to publish their photo's for that basic purpose. Not everyone wants monetary payment for the use of their photo. They can't use the pictures without their permission.
You Shysters always try to find a loophole to fit your wallet depending on the circumstances.
Attorney and common sense in the same paragraph! Go back to work chasing ambulances and use the mileage for a tax write-off.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ghostdog on September 08, 2004, 05:06:25 PM
I believe what Dick was saying is in the case that someone is using material for their own monatary gain they would need the right of the model/person. Also in the case of the model/person being exploited in such away that they do not approve of this would also constitute some type of potential recompense back to the abused. Also, by Dick being Sable's Photographer I believe he is thinking about the best interests of his relationship with his clients (which he should do) especially with the rash of thefts from Sables Site recently. I applaud Dick for his Ethics!
People who rip off others people work SUCK!!!! End of Story.

Ghostdog
PS Hey joggs.. How did you like your headache last week? Want more? Don't F with my friends
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jscott991 on September 08, 2004, 06:55:24 PM
They do not usually request the person's permission.  There is usually no expectation of privacy when someone is photographed in a public place.  You are being absurd.  President Bush makes a public appearance and there are 100 people behind him.  Are you telling me that the newspaper goes to each of those people and has them waive royalties!?

You aren't thinking clearly at all.  You got up on a moral high horse without thinking the issue through.  A person photographed in a public place has no right to receive royalties from the publication of that photo.  Tabloids and paparazzi are hardly ever liable for invasion of privacy when taking pictures of **28**.  Are you telling me that the stars waive their right to sue or that they consent to the publication and waiver of licensing fees?  Goodness, ignorance is bliss I suppose.


Quote:

The newspapers and magazines, I'm sure, have the persons permission to publish their photo's for that basic purpose. Not everyone wants monetary payment for the use of their photo. They can't use the pictures without their permission.
You Shysters always try to find a loophole to fit your wallet depending on the circumstances.
Attorney and common sense in the same paragraph! Go back to work chasing ambulances and use the mileage for a tax write-off.  


Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Cumquat on September 08, 2004, 07:21:22 PM
Well if ignorance is bliss, I suppose stupidity must be a virtue with you.
You copied my quote and still don't understand what you read.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jscott991 on September 08, 2004, 07:33:22 PM
I understand it better than you, but I'm beginning to suspect english is not your first language, making this argument a bit useless.

The point is that in the United States, a candid photograph of a person in a public place is not an invasion of privacy in most cases.  Public figures such as President Bush or famous actors do not have to consent for magazines and newspapers to use their likeness in articles, on their covers, or whatever.  Very rarely can someone sue for an invasion of privacy over the publication of a photograph of this type.

Any American or person with common sense would be able to see that this is true.

Quote:

Well if ignorance is bliss, I suppose stupidity must be a virtue with you.
You copied my quote and still don't understand what you read.  


Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jscott991 on September 08, 2004, 07:37:07 PM
Despite their high claims, most newspapers and magazines are published for profit.  Therefore, your logic is the same: Every time a newspaper publishes a photograph of anyone, they must seek their permission.  This is not remotely the case.  If this argument goes on much longer, I'll quote you guys passages from law treatises on this subject, but anyone whose ever read or looked at a magazine or newspaper must know that they haven't obtained a waiver of royalty and privacy rights for every single person whose picture appears within (think of all the soldiers in an Iraq War photograph, the people in a crowd at a political rally, secret service agents who constantly surround the president, actors photographed entering and leaving the Academy Awards, etc.  They have not ALL signed such waivers).

Quote:

I believe what Dick was saying is in the case that someone is using material for their own monatary gain they would need the right of the model/person. Also in the case of the model/person being exploited in such away that they do not approve of this would also constitute some type of potential recompense back to the abused. Also, by Dick being Sable's Photographer I believe he is thinking about the best interests of his relationship with his clients (which he should do) especially with the rash of thefts from Sables Site recently. I applaud Dick for his Ethics!
People who rip off others people work SUCK!!!! End of Story.

Ghostdog
PS Hey joggs.. How did you like your headache last week? Want more? Don't F with my friends
   


Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Cumquat on September 08, 2004, 08:10:57 PM
Sorry Counsellor, but you don't seem to understand that the main topic isn't about President Bush or famous actors or a million people in Grand Central Station or "publications of a photograph of this type."
It's about people STEALING other peoples CREATIVE WORKS and posting it all over the internet or starting their own website with that material and then charging other people a fee to download it.
I'm sure most people aren't like that. But there are a few who are.
You're right, English isn't my first language, AMERICAN is!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jscott991 on September 08, 2004, 08:16:02 PM
Your changing your position now and your changing Dick's position as well.

Read the original quote I responded to and read your followup response.  It specifically referred to newspapers and magazines, while Dick referred to all photographers.

A third party can't take a photographer's photograph and sell it as their own without permission, but that's entirely separate issue from what both you and Dick posted about.

Quote:

Sorry Counsellor, but you don't seem to understand that the main topic isn't about President Bush or famous actors or a million people in Grand Central Station or "publications of a photograph of this type."
It's about people STEALING other peoples CREATIVE WORKS and posting it all over the internet or starting their own website with that material and then charging other people a fee to download it.
I'm sure most people aren't like that. But there are a few who are.
You're right, English isn't my first language, AMERICAN is!  


Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Cumquat on September 08, 2004, 08:42:35 PM
What part of STEALING other peoples CREATIVE WORKS don't you understand Counsellor?
You're quite Nit-Picky aren't you? I suppose everything has to be worded just right and in the proper context for you or you won't be able to understand the basic gist of a discussion. Comprehension, it seems, is not your forte. I can see why you're not a REAL attorney.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dick_Woods on September 08, 2004, 08:44:57 PM
If I may interject....

What Cumquat is saying is absolutely right...and its a huge problem in the industry...there are lowlifes who join websites only to download pics and re-sell them...there are guys who go to events like this and sell pics they have taken on E-bay...again, very low...

But the Fan Fair & expo are different in that its the exotic dancer equivelent of the Caan film festival...( I hope I speled that right...I suck)...it states plainly when cameras are permitted, and when they arent, and as such, when a model is at such an event they *know* they are being photgraphed much the same an actress is at Caan...its done for publicity, exposure, and contact with the fans.

Having said that, I think there are two different arguements going on here...and I bet you would both agree with one another if you were communicating in a different medium.

Stealing is *bad*....for everybody...honest posting of a pic *you* own...is OK in moderation

-D

PS...we send all of our pics to the girls anyway...lol  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kenard on September 08, 2004, 09:04:14 PM
Dick has the right of it.    

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Ghostdog on September 08, 2004, 09:17:28 PM
Sorry J-scott but you are reading between the lines and not between the lines. The point is only a jerk-off steals other peoples published work and then sells it to make money off of it. The point (Besides the one on top of your head) is that Dick takes pictures of Sable.. Does he have the right to do what he wants with them.. I would guess no because there was some agreement. As with walking around the street and having a camera and you take a pic of Sable can you do what you want with it? I would say yes in most cases but there are fine lines to everything. I was just down at LAWnet in AZ last week and this was actually a topic of discussion. Maybe you should have attended.

Ghostdog  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jscott991 on September 08, 2004, 09:40:12 PM
I never referred to anyone stealing someone else's published work.  I responded to a very specific quote by Dick stating that whenever you take a picture of someone, you cannot publish that picture without their permission.  That simply isn't true.  That's not the law.

If you are a third party and you steal a photographers pictures and post them or sell them, that's an entirely separate issue.

What's happened here is that Cumquat and Dick made very broad statements to attack a very specific problem and now Cumquat is trying to back off the broad aspects of his attack to change to a separate issue.  If they had posted on the minor issue of stealing someone's work being bad (who doesn't think that?), I never would have posted.

I don't want to get personal here (despite the fact that several of the people responding to me have been very personal in their attacks, which is a violation of forum rules by the way), but you guys aren't reading my posts very well or are deliberately misstating what I've said to score whatever points you feel at stake here.

My point has always been if you take a candid photograph of someone at an event like Vegas 2004, you don't have to have the model or **29**'s permission to publish that picture in most cases.  That's simply how the tort of invasion of privacy works.

Quote:

Sorry J-scott but you are reading between the lines and not between the lines. The point is only a jerk-off steals other peoples published work and then sells it to make money off of it. The point (Besides the one on top of your head) is that Dick takes pictures of Sable.. Does he have the right to do what he wants with them.. I would guess no because there was some agreement. As with walking around the street and having a camera and you take a pic of Sable can you do what you want with it? I would say yes in most cases but there are fine lines to everything. I was just down at LAWnet in AZ last week and this was actually a topic of discussion. Maybe you should have attended.

Ghostdog  


Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Janus on September 08, 2004, 10:19:24 PM
Anyone else find it interesting that a bunch of people with low post counts who seem to be coming out of the blue are harboring anti-what-is-considered-normal ideas and doing so by being obnoxious and calling people names?

 Don't feed the trolls people. Even if they lay low for a summer and THEN decide to attack it's just the new way trolls build "cred" before they start getting nasty.

J- La-le-lu-li-lu
   nonono...the lulalelilo
   li-li-li-le-la
   Damnit!!! lulalelilo
   Oh forget it...I'll read the game manual.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: jscott991 on September 08, 2004, 10:26:36 PM
Good point.  I'm finished with this thread.

Quote:

Anyone else find it interesting that a bunch of people with low post counts who seem to be coming out of the blue are harboring anti-what-is-considered-normal ideas and doing so by being obnoxious and calling people names?

 Don't feed the trolls people. Even if they lay low for a summer and THEN decide to attack it's just the new way trolls build "cred" before they start getting nasty.

J- La-le-lu-li-lu
   nonono...the lulalelilo
   li-li-li-le-la
   Damnit!!! lulalelilo
   Oh forget it...I'll read the game manual.  


Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Cumquat on September 08, 2004, 10:48:09 PM
If you'd care to check my original reply. It had to do with people stealing other peoples work.
As far as Dick's reply, I'm sure he's talking about having the permission FROM HIS CLIENTS to be able to publish their photos legally.
You're the one that made the first comment about the newspapers and magazines.
And besides,the photographs that are taken by the photographers that are employed by the news-media, become the property of the news-media and not the photographers. Maybe if you're a freelance photo journalist the photography rights might be different.
Sorry Counsellor, CASE CLOSED!
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on September 09, 2004, 01:41:16 AM
  Holy Crap!  What has happened to the original thread??!!
I think we need to all settle down and get back to the subject of Chelsea Charms in Vegas!  
Besides, I think this thread has gone off topic and should be moved to the complaint area! Moderator?  
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on September 09, 2004, 01:55:27 AM
Thank you UncleSam.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: solvegas on September 09, 2004, 02:43:07 AM
I second Uncle Sam . Can't we all just get along ? I'd rather see Chelsea's Tits than argue copyright law which seems to belong in the off topic section .  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: rtpoe on September 09, 2004, 02:43:20 AM
Crystal Storm & Chelsea Charms at the Fan Fair Bikini Contest.

rtpoe  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on September 09, 2004, 03:24:39 AM
Thanks for the backup BoobBrothers solvegas and rptoe.
 
pm solvegas.  

P.S. my crystal and Chelsea
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on September 09, 2004, 04:51:41 AM
Hey solvegas
I can't pm you as your setting are not to recieve. pm with a email or turn pm on your setting.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: H_man on September 09, 2004, 06:18:46 AM
I LOVE Crystal's T-shirt! Both Crystal and Chelsea totally live up to that!    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: StormDancer on September 10, 2004, 12:26:43 AM
Well, CRYSTAL lives up to it -- and that's the point that she's trying to make, i.e., that there's a lot of quantity out there but little quality.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on September 10, 2004, 04:16:05 AM
Now I have seen everything!
Chelsea Charms listed in the Internet Movie Data Base IMDB.  It says that she was born in 1976 making her 28.  I guess that sounds about right.

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0153348/

Any comments?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Scotty on September 10, 2004, 06:07:22 AM
Why is that so strange? Most porn stars/models are listed at IMDB.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 10, 2004, 09:33:58 AM
hahaha. good move by one of her fans
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on September 10, 2004, 01:05:17 PM
Yeah she has been on there a while. Notice how they don't even have all of her movies listed. In this case, "what's in a name?" doesn't amount to much. Chelsea's picture is worth a thousand words and about 8000cc's  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: titmouse on September 10, 2004, 09:00:47 PM
unfortunately i cant find a bacon number for her
it says she isnt listed
perhaps we need to establish it
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on September 10, 2004, 09:49:11 PM
Now that is just amazing!  I remember quite well when Crystal sat atop the biggest-bust throne.  Looks like Chelsea is the well deserving queen now by a longshot.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: St Stephan on September 10, 2004, 10:45:37 PM
The trivia page is interesting:
Quote:

As of early 2002, her measurements were 135XXX-22-34. Because of the nature of her implants, her breast size may continue to increase.

Is a fan of amateur and semi-pro baseball and basketball.


135XXX?  Wonder where they got that.

What's a bacon number?

0 ( ( o ! <
J

 I thought actors were hams.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 10, 2004, 11:10:08 PM
135XXX?  Wonder where they got that.

hmm. from some older interview (maybe her radio interview where the djs molded chips bowls from her tits with plaster)... which was also written down somewhere....I dont remeber clearly right now...

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JBob on September 11, 2004, 01:19:16 AM
Quote:

135XXX?  Wonder where they got that.



Well, Chelsea's web site lists her a 153XXX, so perhaps he got it from there and is dyslexic or just fat-fingered it. As for the number itself, it looks like the standard big bust star measurement math...

1.Instead of a bra size measurement, they use her 'bust' measurement (i.e. the measurement around her breasts, not her ribcage).

2.They list it in cm instead of inches to make the number larger. 153cm is about 60 in., which seems about right.

3. Sometimes they use foreign cup sizes if goes further up the alphabet. However XXX could be accurate...

If we guess her band size is a 34, then 60in.-34in. gives us 26. One cup size per inch puts us at a 34Z, which, depending on the manufacturer, could also be a 34XXX (34X + 2 cup sizes), and XXX sounds better when promoting an exotic dancer.

Quote:

What's a bacon number?



Have you heard of 'Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon'?

If not, here are the basics...
It's a game based on the theory of six degrees of separation (i.e. any two people can be connected by six or fewer associated people). The idea is that, given his extensive body of work, almost any actor can be connected to Kevin Bacon. The goal of the game is to try and connect a given actor to Bacon in the fewest steps...their 'Bacon number'.

Current Example, Tobey Maguire:

1. Tobey Maguire was in 'Spiderman' with Kirsten Dunst.
2. Kirsten Dunst was in 'Interview with a Vampire' with Tom Cruise.
3. Tom Cruise was in 'A Few Good Men' with ..... Kevin Bacon.

So Tobey's 'Bacon number' for this example is 3.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Character Zero on September 11, 2004, 04:59:58 AM
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0591425/bio

According to Minka's biography on IMDB, she was on an episode of Jerry Springer in 1997 and appeared on Conan O'Brien (!) in 1993 in a "toe sucking" sketch. Is there *any* chance someone might be able to find and post these clips? It'd be tough to track down, I know, but there are a lot of us here, and it's definately something to keep an eye open for! (and with cable and repeats, anything is possible.)

Toe sucking sketch... on NBC... man, how did Conan ever stay on the air?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 11, 2004, 06:15:28 PM
Post deleted by Hentaibee
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 11, 2004, 06:18:55 PM
and here are the people who support that

he paid chelsea, but auctioning makes him too much IMHO..lol....someone should report him to ebay for sale of arousing goods....

http://feedback.ebay.com/ws1/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=glamourchest&items=25&page=9&frompage=-1&iid=-1&de=off
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: g0ddmode on September 11, 2004, 07:04:36 PM
Quote:

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0591425/bio

According to Minka's biography on IMDB, she was on an episode of Jerry Springer in 1997 and appeared on Conan O'Brien (!) in 1993 in a "toe sucking" sketch. Is there *any* chance someone might be able to find and post these clips? It'd be tough to track down, I know, but there are a lot of us here, and it's definately something to keep an eye open for! (and with cable and repeats, anything is possible.)

Toe sucking sketch... on NBC... man, how did Conan ever stay on the air?  




I have the Jerry Springer Episode recorded from 97 sitting around here somewhere. Any ideas to convert it to computer? If I could do that, then I would share via p2p or something.   Please PM me with advice.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 11, 2004, 07:36:42 PM
Quote:

 have actually read on some boards and heard personally from people who i trust that on occasion Chelsea has gone all the way, not that it was earth shattering.  




hmmm... wasnt that a post by a guy she really liked when she was in san francisco some years ago? (she wrote some stuff like that in an old newsletter...)

conclusion of this thread...

shes a DANCER not an ESCORT. learn the difference :P
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Character Zero on September 11, 2004, 09:46:22 PM
I don't have the technical know-how to turn a video clip into a video file, but someone here must. Suggestions anyone? Once I get the file, I'm sure I could come up with a way to share it.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: H_man on September 12, 2004, 06:32:55 AM
Quote:

Well, CRYSTAL lives up to it -- and that's the point that she's trying to make, i.e., that there's a lot of quantity out there but little quality.  




Stormdancer, that's remarkably rude of you to say.

I've spent a good deal of time in the company of both ladies and found them both to be the very essence of quality as well as quantity.

That said, I've looked at your recent posts, Stormdancer, and you seem to be a shill for Ms. Storm. Do you work for her or, god forbid, ARE you Crystal Storm?

I'm hoping you're not because if you are her my opinion of her has been shot all to hell.      
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on September 12, 2004, 10:20:17 AM
Quote:



Stormdancer, that's remarkably rude of you to say.

     







H_Man I think you misunderstood stormdancer! Little quality wasn't said in regard of Crystal.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on September 12, 2004, 06:16:17 PM
As far as creating a video file....
If you have a video tape, then the first thing you need to do is capture it from VCR to PC.  This requires a capture card with video input.  After that you can encode it or compress it to reduce the file size.  If you don't have a capture card with video input, find someone who does and go for it!  
Good Luck !!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: H_man on September 13, 2004, 05:59:07 AM
I took it as in regard to Chelsea. That even though Chelsea has the quantity, somehow she didn't measure up quality wise to Crystal. How did he mean it? My post was only to point out how BOTH ladies exemplify quantity AND quality in spades.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: fitnessphotos on September 13, 2004, 08:23:43 PM
Quote:

Tabloids and paparazzi are hardly ever liable for invasion of privacy when taking pictures of **28**.




The law makes the distinction between a **29** (or public figure) and those who are not. Without a release, you *may* find yourself on the receiving side of a lawsuit and having to pay to defend against it. That's not to say you wouldn't win, but without a release you run the risk for which you have little defense and should you lose, you could find yourself in a very bad spot.

Can you do it? Sure.
Can you be sured for it? Yep, its called commercial misappropriation. The issue here isn't the use, but sale, of images.

And at the end of the day, the people who are gaurenteed to be paid are the lawyers.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on September 15, 2004, 01:11:02 AM
There has been some talk lately that Chelsea has not been amused by the discussions here about her.  Some being negative.  I for one think she is fantastic and should be respected for being the biggest and carrying on in fine form (quite literally).
I think we should start by expressing our praise for the wonder that is Chelsea. If we can all keep our heads and refrain from bashing comments, she may actually post!
I would like to hear from some of the other big bust stars about this also (Like Crystal) - what do you think? Can anyone talk to her about posting here for her fans?!   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrEff on September 15, 2004, 01:32:02 AM
I second the motion.... if Chelsea has anything to disagree with then she should come on  here like so many other mega-titters (i.e. Keisha, Melonie, Vixen) and post her concerns.... there must be a way we can alert her to us.....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RoosterBoy on September 15, 2004, 01:44:59 AM
 Unfortunalty being at the top is a double edge sword, by being the largest breasted woman out there she's attracted a lot of negative attention. I however think everything about her is beautiful. I'd consider myself a lucky man if I could find a woman even half of what she is. It's just too bad that a lot of people only see her as a curriosity and not as a real person.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Knight on September 15, 2004, 03:41:31 AM
Well I for one would love to see comments from Chelsea. Regardless of being the biggest, or best.. Simply put, she is a class act second to none. This is only my view point.. Why anyone would think anything less then this, in this fourm of all places.. Is beyond me...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MasterX0 on September 15, 2004, 04:06:50 AM
I think it would kickass if she posted here.  She is the Queen of the big boob world.  The problem is there are idiots that run around on here and would be shitheads to her.  I think she should be respected and oogled as well.  I think it would be up to her.  She is on top of this world(breast wise) but who wants to put up with guys acting like little kids.  If she does join in her, i hope all of us can respect her and admire her beauty and very very large breasts.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BarneyFife on September 15, 2004, 05:54:09 AM
On my other post(the crystal gunns) thread I mentioned how this board would welcome Chelsea with open arms and that many other big busted entertainers have joined with no problem.I wonder myself if chelsea is open to the idea of openly discussing issues about herself since she seems a very private person.I think we can all respect that even though for fans it kills us not to know more about the most incredible big bust entertainer in the industry.Has anyone thought that while Chelsea in public chelsea adores her fans but perhaps after being bombarded daily about boobs,boobs,boobs she gets tired of the constant same questions and is turned off by public boards or even chat sessions? I know just a thought since there has to be reasons why chelsea does not want to participate on public boards.If others have read my previous post I did mention that no fourm is perfect and every once in a while an idiot will say stupid things but the majority of BEA members are very respectful and would treat chelsea warmly and professionally.

It would be incredible having chelsea has a member but we all have to repect her if she remains private.The greatest big bust entertainer maybe ever and yet we may never know more about her.Oh well life isn't perfect!        
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Blax12 on September 15, 2004, 07:01:02 AM
 Everyone is welcome. Everyone with boobs is very welcome. Everyone with big boobs is absolutely welcome. How welcome can be the world's most incredible symbol of breast expansion into the breast expansion community?

The dimension of her "welcomeness" (oh, c'mon I am a strananger, I can say it) is as big as her tits.

Blax12  
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Cutter on September 15, 2004, 09:14:47 AM
I as well would like it if Lady Chelsea Charms would come to this little part of the net.

We can get a bit rabid in defense of a lady when they fall under attack.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on September 15, 2004, 09:43:52 AM
Quote:

Has anyone thought that while Chelsea in public chelsea adores her fans but perhaps after being bombarded daily about boobs,boobs,boobs she gets tired of the constant same questions and is turned off by public boards or even chat sessions? I know just a thought since there has to be reasons why chelsea does not want to participate on public boards.If others have read my previous post I did mention that no fourm is perfect and every once in a while an idiot will say stupid things but the majority ...




Well this stupid things happened on her message board before she made it private to the members. There were returning stupid things like:
... she should do hardcore
... grow much bigger until she can't walk anymore
... her tits explode
... flaming peoples each other
... about the shape of her breasts/nipples/veins
...

I guess you have to except such things when you go to forums or public boards. So here decission was not to do it. Even on her own board she only posted every 1 or 2 months and very seldom did answering to fan messages.

Bye,
andrat2000
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RHIC on September 15, 2004, 10:10:10 AM
This forum and actual big-boobed women is like a powder keg and a match. . .

So far there's not a great track record for the interaction of the two.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 15, 2004, 11:20:48 AM
lets draw a line between fantasy and reality and be polite to models
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrEff on September 15, 2004, 11:28:00 AM
werd
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MissChievous on September 15, 2004, 11:30:14 AM
Quote:

lets draw a line between fantasy and reality and be polite to models  




I second that
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on September 15, 2004, 01:25:17 PM
Quote:

lets draw a line between fantasy and reality and be polite to models  




Nicely put!  Sometimes it is forgotten that the reason we are all here on this site are these models !!!!!
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on September 15, 2004, 02:16:22 PM
well sorry to be bit harsh but uh not everyone is gonna just be nice cos she wants them too. there will always be the stupid moronic questions. i for one like the fact that she's the biggest and nice too... no matter what there's just no way to get rid of the moronic threads at this forum unless mods/admins starts deleting the dumb posts like that(just a suggestion). some people will be nice some wont simple fact of reality the BEA gets it's share of trolls and n00b questions and botches just like any forum

Besides how does she know about what people post here anyways? what is someone here a narc running and telling her or something just curious?    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ac man on September 15, 2004, 02:42:18 PM
if i remember right, when chelesa first started, she posted here some, but now she is too big for us (pun intended)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: USER_2381_NOT_FOUND on September 15, 2004, 02:56:51 PM
She probably wants to stick with the forums where more people pay to see her.  That was not actually a disparaging comment, I'm simply saying it makes good business sense.  If she posted here, words and pictures, for free, then some people might not be willing to pay to see her premium stuff.

Don't get me wrong, I REALLY REALLY want her to come here, I've been a huge fan since day one, (and if she's reading this, you STILL owe me that lap-dance), but we might have to sweeten the deal somehow.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: xmanj on September 15, 2004, 03:10:10 PM
It would be awesome if the worlds most beautiful woman would join this forum!
There ist only one Chelsea and it would be great to get some news from her!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MasterX0 on September 15, 2004, 04:24:05 PM
It would be great to see her here.  But as a few other said, we must respect her privacy and life.  We cant PM her to death.  That will just scare her away and she has other things to do as well.  Our other models have the same situation.  So i guess we wait and see if her lovlyness comes here and posts with us.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 16, 2004, 12:39:14 AM
I agree to one of the above huys, she should post the good stuff in her member site. so that her team can finally update her newsletter someday.... it it the most neglected part of her website as of now. maybe it is lackluster or too much work to get fan orders ready and do travelling...
(and her life isnt easy, off course ...)

Whatever miss Chelsea chooses, I am sure that she has our community's fullest support.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Mr_Jellybean on September 16, 2004, 01:35:54 PM
I would love to see Chelsea here anytime
But if she chooses not to post here I will respect her privacy and I will adore her no less than before.....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Breasts on September 16, 2004, 04:50:41 PM
Let us all hope that Chelsea does decide to post here.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Mazza44 on September 27, 2004, 05:39:16 PM
Anyone know if her official site is worth joining these days or are the updates as infrequent as always?
And Photoclubs, how are the updates there these days?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 27, 2004, 09:50:45 PM
her site updates are more and better, and the newsletter just got refreshed too! By all means, NOW is the time to join her site !!! Great things are comming!

If you cant get enough of her like I do, also join her photoclub by all means (preferably though her site's banners)

But if you want to be totally blown away, also rent a bosomquest !!!!

It's the most amazing thing you will ever see on the internet !
(plus you support one of the most classy models in existance!!!)

I am sorry if previous things posted by me here did not reflect my correct point of view.I seem to suffer from multiple personality disorders when I am hating my real life job.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jim31415 on September 27, 2004, 11:55:33 PM
I'd love to see her.

I mean I'd love to see her post here.  

It's great when a mega-busty model chimes in every now and again.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 28, 2004, 11:26:34 AM
just a bump. so everybody can see what I really think.
(notice the signature line)

please dont flame me for being positively positive about the biggest of the big  (like photoclubs is saying)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 29, 2004, 11:14:17 AM
Quote:

What pay sites are you a member of now Hentaibee, and how do you like them?  




I am a member of chelseacharms.com because its her best still image material form a photographic point of view(in my honest oppinion). And off course her video material is super pretty. especially her latest DVD. I wholeheartedly recommend buying that disc. And if you're tight on budget, you might jsut become photoclub members so you get a chance to rent a bosomquest. I hear they have the amazing chelsea at the swimming pool scene on rerun, so all new fans get a chance to view. Nice move from the photoclubs gang :-) (still there is no foreign billing solution for bosomquest if you want to pay without C.card., and NO a DIALER is not a welcome option, I know you read here folks.)

I was a member of sakurasena.ca until 1 week ago. good value for money.

I was a member of scoreland and photoclubs for some months.
The foreign bank billing processor couldnt get the money from my dutch bank properly. :-( apparently rules here in NL bank are a bit tight.  

They MAY pay one-time modelling fees. but hey. If it helps a model acquire things like building a nice home, I'm in for it  
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 29, 2004, 11:17:16 AM
oh. and let me add . I dont pay for the people at adultbouncer who rip off so many hentai artists.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 29, 2004, 11:24:33 AM
Quote:

I like her official site best... photo as photclubs are ok. and BQ vids are not DVD quality, but EXPENSIVE  




and let me correct this. the nice people at bosomquest/pc lowered prices. :-) Now's the time to rent some!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on September 29, 2004, 07:57:56 PM
sorry dear CC and dear Scott, for me being a nutcase. my brain is messed up these days :-(
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: somnophorev2 on October 17, 2004, 09:48:48 PM
Chelsea Charms is to be in Monday's edition of the Daily Sport. How do I know this? It's advertised in the Sunday Sport which I was sorting and packing at 4 am this morning.

The exact title was something like:

 "123 XX Beauty Hits The UK"

Does this mean Chelsea may be or has recently visited the UK? If so how could I miss such a thing!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 17, 2004, 09:50:30 PM
Nice to see Chelsea getting the media attention she deserves, having the largest chest in the world.  Does The Sport have a website?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 17, 2004, 09:54:07 PM
Quote:

Chelsea Charms is to be in Monday's edition of the Daily Sport. How do I know this? It's advertised in the Sunday Sport which I was sorting and packing at 4 am this morning.

The exact title was something like:

 "123 XX Beauty Hits The UK"

Does this mean Chelsea may be or has recently visited the UK? If so how could I miss such a thing!  



]

on the other hand, if she came to the uk. I'd get some money ASAP. lol


it means they will probaby publish more morphs of Chelsea :-) they previously did in the sunday sport:
 
 
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 17, 2004, 09:57:46 PM
Awesome!  Thanks for the scans!  I do love the UK!

Who is Sally Matthews???  From what I can see, she looks an awful a lot like our very own Keisha.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 17, 2004, 10:02:12 PM
now we need scans of the monday daily sport to compare
I already asked my mate in the uk
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 17, 2004, 10:03:19 PM
Quote:



Who is Sally Matthews???  




they sometimes twist the reality and say keisha morphs are Sally Matthews LMAO
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on October 17, 2004, 10:06:02 PM
she doesn't really look all that big... but i know i know in pics yes IRL shes much bigger

kinda like when the side car mirror but my version would be WARNING! OBJECTS IN REAL LIFE ARE BIGGER THEN THEY APPEAR! anyways it is good that she gets media attention... has this ever happened to anyo ther big bust star though? i mean like the kinda attention Chelsea gets  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: bignatslover on October 18, 2004, 10:37:17 AM
Is the Sport claiming that Chelsea lives in the UK????  yeah, right!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: The_Fonz on October 18, 2004, 02:43:24 PM
It sounded like they were implying that.  

And calling Keisha someone else...seems like some not quite lawful things.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: somnophorev2 on October 18, 2004, 02:52:32 PM
Has brought it, and it says that they are going to get her over here next month, take her round London, up to Manchester (The Sports head offices are there) and to Blackpool of all places.

Will keep people informed if they post actual dates for this event as living in the UK this could be a great chance to see Chelsea in the FLESH!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Claire on October 18, 2004, 03:01:00 PM
i could go see her in blackpool. maybe if i have time i might hehe
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: wander2ponder on October 18, 2004, 08:32:34 PM
The power of the press....worldwide!
C.C. is a real hit both sides of the Atlantic.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: psowden on October 18, 2004, 09:46:46 PM
I would love to see chelsea here in England, however I can't decide whether it will happen or not as I don't totally trust the daily sport, but then what do they gain from lying.  Hopefully we will find out soon for certain.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 18, 2004, 09:55:52 PM
yeah.... but if it happens it will be a very exclusive thing, I fear?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 18, 2004, 10:05:05 PM
Quote:

The power of the press....worldwide!
C.C. is a real hit both sides of the Atlantic.  




Shes getting a large audience :-)
See my post in the VCR alerts. lol

That pic form the sun"hit national dutch television (for a minute, but hey. exposure is important)

That show has around 300.000-900.000 viewers daily
I'am sure some like what they saw  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on October 18, 2004, 10:53:05 PM
Two things:

1) Where do the Sport's pictures of Chelsea come from? I'll bet they were not obtained from her.

2) The Sport can say anything they like about Chelsea coming to London. If she doesn't, then they just don't mention it again and it drops out of sight.

The Sport have always played fast and loose with people's pictures and facts. A few years ago they carried a completely fictitious story about Lorna Morgan that was far from complimentary. Lorna, being the class act that she is, said she was not worried as it would be "tomorrow's chip papers". A laudably mature attitude. I doubt I could have been so cool about it had it been me.

If Chelsea does come to London, I would appeal to all her fans to respect her. I have met Chelsea on several occasions and while she does appreciate her fans she does not like to be mobbed by crowds of them. So fellow Englishmen, let's show a little class.

Pixeltiger

PS I'll bet they are using that pic of Keisha without permission. If taken to court they would doubtless argue that they did not know it was copyrighted material.. They have enough legal muscle to make suing them far too expensive and drawn out to be feasible for a single girl. M&^*^%rfu%^^ers.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 18, 2004, 11:08:11 PM
more scans soon for all people who wonder.

just forget what I said. I think I didnt do Keisha Evans any justice with my remark.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Keisha_Evans on October 19, 2004, 01:23:08 AM
Sigh...I don't really think it's funny.     I'm trying to get my name out there and working hard to keep my site alive and growing.  (So I can get the gigantic boobs I lust for) You think they'd at least give me credit in the name department.  

*sigh*

Keisha *I need a pouty face emote* Evans  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on October 19, 2004, 01:36:26 AM
I tell you what Keisha, when I get my Hummer I'll have your picture customed into the paintjob. You'll be my 'hood-babe'.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Keisha_Evans on October 19, 2004, 02:21:14 AM
Thanks sweetie!    I wonder where they'll fit the tits?  

But most importantly....Do I get a free ride?  

Keisha  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 19, 2004, 02:26:13 AM
Keisha,

You should write them!  Or we should write them on your behalf.  You would look great gracing the British tabloids.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Duck_n_Cover on October 19, 2004, 02:27:44 AM
maybe  that's why Hummers (the real, AM General ones, not that H2 garbage) are ludicrously wide? fate has aligned such things as huge military vehicles and breasts in a grand fashion, it seems.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Keisha_Evans on October 19, 2004, 03:00:13 AM
Quote:

PS I'll bet they are using that pic of Keisha without permission. If taken to court they would doubtless argue that they did not know it was copyrighted material.. They have enough legal muscle to make suing them far too expensive and drawn out to be feasible for a single girl. M&^*^%rfu%^^ers.




I'm sure you're right.  They don't have my permission to use my pic and morphed or not, I still retain the copyright.  Not to mention that it's awfully coincidental that I was contacted last year by someone wanting me to fly over and do and interview for them.  (Like I have that kind of money    ) That said, they know who I am.  *boot to their heads*

Keisha Evans  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Keisha_Evans on October 19, 2004, 03:30:15 AM
Quote:

maybe  that's why Hummers (the real, AM General ones, not that H2 garbage) are ludicrously wide? fate has aligned such things as huge military vehicles and breasts in a grand fashion, it seems.  




Maybe it also explains my attraction to them.    

Keisha  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 19, 2004, 08:46:42 AM
uuummmm...Keisha. usually if they REALLY wanna check out the USA's big bust entertainers ..THEY (the tabloids) pay the flight and stay :-) !
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 19, 2004, 08:50:05 AM
Quote:

Nice to see Chelsea getting the media attention she deserves, having the largest chest in the world.  Does The Sport have a website?  




the sports' website is a crappy pay sex website. really awkward... take that for what it's worth.

Nonetheless that tabloid is THE publicity thing for busty ladies in the UK, I guess. Imagine all those construction workers ( no offense, my construction friends)
drooling over the superb boobs :-)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Keisha_Evans on October 19, 2004, 03:20:49 PM
Quote:

uuummmm...Keisha. usually if they REALLY wanna check out the USA's big bust entertainers ..THEY (the tabloids) pay the flight and stay :-) !  




Well then I guess I'm just not big enough to merit that.

*Quick!  Somebody!  I need larger tits!*  

Keisha  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: The_Fonz on October 19, 2004, 03:47:11 PM
*Runs around all excited and waving his arms*

Hurry, dammit! She needs bigger tits!!!!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on October 19, 2004, 03:48:10 PM
Quote:

Thanks sweetie!    I wonder where they'll fit the tits?  

But most importantly....Do I get a free ride?  

Keisha  




Probably over the headlights. A free ride? Sure. I'll drive slow so you won't bounce around too much. Wait, no I won't  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TommyHillfiller on October 19, 2004, 03:55:10 PM
Quote:

*Runs around all excited and waving his arms*

Hurry, dammit! She needs bigger tits!!!!  




*Cocks saline gun* I'm on it :P  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 19, 2004, 08:28:54 PM
credits to a big Chelsea fan from London
How do they make up their text (a mix of her official site text and SOME fantasy)?
And how did they steal those images? (this was rhetorical. they probably have them from Joggs)

 
 
 

Great publicity anyway, but the way of presentation...well. lets just say it's not the most professional way to approach busty models, is it?




 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: The_Fonz on October 19, 2004, 09:13:46 PM
Interesting, only 23.  IMDb has her listed as being born in 1976. But maybe the UK is 5 years behind us. But that would make her younger than Linsey and Kerry Marie, which doesn't quite add up.

Something is seriously fishy here, where's Scooby Doo and those meddling kids?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 19, 2004, 09:33:44 PM
http://www.reviewcentre.com/review121323.html

oh my god :-) who reviewed that?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on October 19, 2004, 09:55:17 PM
hmmmmmmm

Chelsea is not porn star nor is she a brunette.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 23, 2004, 01:38:36 AM
Any more on Chelsea in the UK?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: NorthernStars on October 23, 2004, 09:56:11 PM
you know, that Sally Matthews looks bigger than Chelsea. Atleast I see it...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: NorthernStars on October 23, 2004, 09:58:12 PM
And she looks like a she is natural...WOW  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 23, 2004, 10:11:59 PM
Quote:

Any more on Chelsea in the UK?  




Sorry.
It's NOT gonna happen right now "and not for the sport", so she says in her private area. they are seemingly unprofessional and published the news without having an agreement with Miss Chelsea Charms. questionable ways of doing business.

Shows that Chelsea got brains and isnt anyone's "bimbo", if you ask me ! Way to go !
Dont you agree?

Those paparazzi should have a bit more respect towards models and copyright and even to the fellows who read their tabloid. *sigh*
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on October 24, 2004, 12:32:58 AM
Doesn't surprise me that they did that to Chelsea coinsidering they posted a photo of our own Keisha without her permission it seems.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: peschi on October 24, 2004, 10:24:31 AM
Quote:

Quote:

Any more on Chelsea in the UK?  




Sorry.
It's NOT gonna happen right now "and not for the sport", so she says in her private area. they are seemingly unprofessional and published the news without having an agreement with Miss Chelsea Charms. questionable ways of doing business.

Shows that Chelsea got brains and isnt anyone's "bimbo", if you ask me ! Way to go !
Dont you agree?





absolutley! The way they portrayed her as a pornstar and even without her consent.

At the other hand, too bad she won't visit London. If I knew the day I would just visit London for the sites that day. Seeing chelsea would easily justify a ticket to London, hell, I even think it justifies a visit to the other side of the world.

Peschi  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 24, 2004, 11:44:20 AM
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Any more on Chelsea in the UK?  




Sorry.
It's NOT gonna happen right now "and not for the sport", so she says in her private area. they are seemingly unprofessional and published the news without having an agreement with Miss Chelsea Charms. questionable ways of doing business.

Shows that Chelsea got brains and isnt anyone's "bimbo", if you ask me ! Way to go !
Dont you agree?





absolutley! The way they portrayed her as a pornstar and even without her consent.

At the other hand, too bad she won't visit London. If I knew the day I would just visit London for the sites that day. Seeing chelsea would easily justify a ticket to London, hell, I even think it justifies a visit to the other side of the world.

Peschi  




Well. Let's just make it a ticket to las vegas sometime :-)
The more ladies you can meet and greet, the merrier !
And maybe even hook up with some BEA people.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 30, 2004, 09:07:07 PM
Quote:

It seems when you have to pay for something, you take it more seriously. Conversation on pay-only message boards is quite good.
   




absolutely. this is the reality.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on October 30, 2004, 09:57:24 PM
Me like Chelsea's HUGE FAKE TITS.  

FTR!!!  

see yaa...  =)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Palomine on October 31, 2004, 01:54:24 AM
Quote:

Quote:

It seems when you have to pay for something, you take it more seriously. Conversation on pay-only message boards is quite good.
   




absolutely. this is the reality.  





Which probably explains the uneven quality of conversation here once in a while.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on October 31, 2004, 02:50:18 AM
I have to agree with melonie 100%... if you get into this particular business BB models need to understand there will always be people that will verbally abuse her like that it's reality, it's life no different! if she does not want them to bitch, whine, moan and complain and use verbal abuse then she's shouldn't be in the business. im sure she is a very nice person, i wouldn't mind meeting her or just hanging out but heck if tha'd happen i'd just die.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 31, 2004, 11:01:31 AM
If she chooses to avoid ridiculous and negative things, it's a good choice in regards to her social policies. As she once put it "life is too short [to be different]".

Recently I have learned that life IS too short :-(
So if you cant respect her and how she pleases the boob community ..hmmm..maybe just shut up.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on October 31, 2004, 12:10:57 PM
Guys I think you are wrong with your suppose that Chelsea transfered the message board to the Paysite because of herself. I much more belief this was because of here fans that where very unhappy with those entries of the idiots. Her message board was nearly unreadable at that time.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on October 31, 2004, 12:13:13 PM
too true. I remember there even were those threads that would crash my webbrowser by pure length of idiot talks.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: EgregiousSamuel on November 01, 2004, 03:13:10 AM
As I understand it, Chelsea Charms' breasts are mostly fluid inside, suspended by a loose matrix of flesh and string.  Does the blood then circulate only on a narrow onion-skin around the outside?  With so little blood flowing toward them, what is the temperature deep within the fluid of Chelsea's breasts?  If stabbed in the breast, would the fluid flow out like a water balloon, or is it captured quite tightly in the loose internal matrix?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BP on November 01, 2004, 04:01:56 AM
I don't think I'm the first person who will say this: whatever your interest, there are a lot of people uncomfortable with the kind of imagery you used there. Of course you are free to say (almost) anything around here, but it's not the general tone of things around here. Subject matter is fine, of course.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RHIC on November 01, 2004, 04:27:58 AM
You know, you're right, but. . .

It *is* intruiging.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: notty on November 01, 2004, 05:55:55 AM
80 and humid with a chance of rain  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on November 01, 2004, 08:44:57 AM
Post deleted by Hentaibee
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on November 01, 2004, 09:15:45 AM
 
Quote:

moderators, I dont think I wanna see this post.
Samuel made me puke.
 




Some of your posts give me the same reaction, but calling for the moderators to remove is limiting freedom of speech.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on November 01, 2004, 09:41:20 AM
Quote:

 
Quote:

moderators, I dont think I wanna see this post.
Samuel made me puke.
 




Some of your posts give me the same reaction, but calling for the moderators to remove is limiting freedom of speech.  




Admitted. But isnt talking about stabbing breasts a little bit too much? I encourage freedom of speech. But arent posts like that making BEAforums look like lunatics'day out?? He could simply read his own "how do they feel" thread again and possibly the answer has been said already...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on November 01, 2004, 11:14:12 AM
OK, kids, follow along
     
  • Chelsea started out with "normal" saline implants.
  • A "Pocket was developed inside the breast itself  
  • Second implant, pocket enlarges  
  • String is implanted into the pocket on augmentation #3  
  • Wall of scar tissue around the pocket contains the string implant  
  • body doesn't like the feel of string  
  • body forms fluid around the string to "soften things"  
  • Strgin "unravels" due to fluid  
  • Body says "Hmm, more fluid needed here - expansion"  
  • Process repeats continuously  
  • Entire contents of pocket are separated from blood stream by original scarr tissue wall around implant pocket
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ninjrk on November 02, 2004, 12:05:54 AM
Depends on the degree of fibrous infiltrate into the implant.  I have no clue about that in this case (Melonie or Teddi would probably know, since they're carrying the things) but if it's like normal polypropylene based implants, there probably is some deep into the implant, probably not much deeper than where it first laid itself down in the 4-12 weeks after the implant was implanted.  Those will be fed by capillary beds, which brings up the question of how deep they could feed as the implant and capsule expand.  Either you have some developed veins and arterioles to keep the deeper fibrous tissue fed or you might have the deeper fibrous tissue die off and get resorbed.  The fibrous capsule will be cannalated, of course.  I'd guess the temperature would be somewhat lower in the core, certainly normal large implants give a cool feeling to the touch and it would probably follow a similar model as the testicles, which hang out for the purpose of lowering temperature.  So, it's probably a few degrees cooler than the rest of the body.

I'd assume that there isn't a lot of fibrous infiltrate into the breast so any expansion since implantation is going to be fluid. If the tough capsule was breached, you'd probably see most of the fluid exit and have the skin conform to the original suture volume, so probably a saggy balloon, although the capsule itself will tend to retain it's shape.

Matt  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: rtpoe on November 02, 2004, 02:53:57 AM
Good answers, Name_Withheld and ninjrk.

Some of you, tsk tsk.

It was obviously a legitimate hypothetical question.

Miss Charms unusual implants present an interesting medical situation. EgregiousSamuel was clearly concerned about possible complications should Miss Charms meet with an unfortunate accident. I detected no desire for such an accident to occur.

rtpoe
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Beachbum on November 02, 2004, 04:57:35 AM
OK guys...so why can't we leave the discussion of the physiology behind, and appreciate Chelsea for the wonder she is...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: EgregiousSamuel on November 02, 2004, 05:05:48 AM
Thanks for the answers some of you.

Screw you, others.  I asked a legitimate question and if you're queasy discussing the physiological details of big breasts then you can just stay away from posts clearly entitled such as this.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on November 02, 2004, 05:44:35 AM
Kind-Hearted, Perpetual L-Cupper RTPoe wrote...
Quote:

Good answers, Name_Withheld and ninjrk.



And our friend Egregious Samuel went on to write...
Quote:

Thanks for the answers some of you...




One is happy to be of service!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on November 02, 2004, 10:53:28 AM
Quote:

 I'd assume that there isn't a lot of fibrous infiltrate into the breast so any expansion since implantation is going to be fluid. If the tough capsule was breached, you'd probably see most of the fluid exit and have the skin conform to the original suture volume, so probably a saggy balloon, although the capsule itself will tend to retain it's shape




You assume correctly that except for the immediate area of contact between the outermost layers of string and the inner wall of the breast pocket that there is very little growth of actual body tissue into the space occupied by the string implant.  The vast majority of volume is filled by the string itself and by natural serous fluid which the body introduces to cushion the contact area (same process as a blister).  You're also correct that because there is no bag involved it is possible to remove (or add) serous fluid (or saline solution) into the breast area occupied by the string.  To limit the rate of growth I have occasionally had serous fluid removed by my doctor.  Also, to encourage the stretching of scar tissue in my one breast which had previous complications with bag implants, my doctor has removed serous fluid from my "normal" breast and injected it into my other breast to forcibly stretch the skin.

In the extreme case which you mentioned, I would imagine that if the breast skin is penetrated that a large amount of serous fluid would immediately escape.  However, the actual breast volume wouldn't go down that much since the string would still be present to occupy the space.  Once the breast skin was reclosed by sutures, the body would again begin to fill the 'voids' between the string strands with serous fluid.  This essentially makes string implants leakproof and permanent even in a disastrous scenario, which is why I love mine so much !
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on November 02, 2004, 12:27:29 PM
Quote:

Quote:

 I'd assume that there isn't a lot of fibrous infiltrate into the breast so any expansion since implantation is going to be fluid. If the tough capsule was breached, you'd probably see most of the fluid exit and have the skin conform to the original suture volume, so probably a saggy balloon, although the capsule itself will tend to retain it's shape




You assume correctly that except for the immediate area of contact between the outermost layers of string and the inner wall of the breast pocket that there is very little growth of actual body tissue into the space occupied by the string implant.  The vast majority of volume is filled by the string itself and by natural serous fluid which the body introduces to cushion the contact area (same process as a blister).  You're also correct that because there is no bag involved it is possible to remove (or add) serous fluid (or saline solution) into the breast area occupied by the string.  To limit the rate of growth I have occasionally had serous fluid removed by my doctor.  Also, to encourage the stretching of scar tissue in my one breast which had previous complications with bag implants, my doctor has removed serous fluid from my "normal" breast and injected it into my other breast to forcibly stretch the skin.

In the extreme case which you mentioned, I would imagine that if the breast skin is penetrated that a large amount of serous fluid would immediately escape.  However, the actual breast volume wouldn't go down that much since the string would still be present to occupy the space.  Once the breast skin was reclosed by sutures, the body would again begin to fill the 'voids' between the string strands with serous fluid.  This essentially makes string implants leakproof and permanent even in a disastrous scenario, which is why I love mine so much !  




Werent there some nasty complications (like unequal expansion) on another stripper who wanted to go huge in corporation with kleevco several years ago? I thoght I read it somewhere.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: brstfetish on November 09, 2004, 04:28:54 AM
Hi,

I read somewhere someone saying that Chelsea is going to be in FL in November I think. I hope I didn't miss this opportunity! Maybe it was another mega breasted model. Anybody know?

Thanks!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on November 09, 2004, 04:59:40 AM
From Chelsea's website:  http://chelseacharms.com/schedule.html

_______________________________________
November 9 - 11
Private Dances
(No club appearance)
Los Angeles, California
_______________________________________

November 16
Private Dances
(No club appearance)
Atlanta, Georgia
_______________________________________

November 17 - 18
Private Dances
(No club appearance)
Chicago, Illinois
_______________________________________

December 7 - 8
Private Dances
(No club appearance)
New York City
_______________________________________

January 11- 15 2005
Booby Trap
Pompano Beach Florida


private dances available
______________________________________

February 9 - 12
Solid Platinum
Lexington Kentucky

private dances available
______________________________________

February 16 - 19
Thee Southern Belle
Charleston, South Carolina

private dances available
_______________________________________




see yaa...  =)
     
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 07, 2004, 10:44:07 PM
OH MY !!!!!   Instant hard-on while watching this brief video clip.  She is pushing her red outfit to its limits !

http://www.chelseacharms.com/home.html

Scroll down to video link:

"Click for a Message from Chelsea's Holiday Workshop"


Christmas will cum early if I see more pics and/or clips of her in that outfit :-)  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 07, 2004, 10:48:15 PM
you bet.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on December 08, 2004, 12:55:53 AM
Excellent!  Thank you for sharing.  Does a memebr of her site still hang out here, like Hentaibee?  And would any member of her site know if there's more inside?

That kind of tease could really increase membership!

CHEERS!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Litch on December 08, 2004, 02:17:10 AM
My word... I still can't comprehend that woman's bust... I think if I ever see her in person I'll either understand it or have my head explode.

Still... it'd be worth it.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MasterX0 on December 08, 2004, 06:00:12 AM
WOW.  Yea.  The suit is definatly streched.
Master"i wanna be Mr. Clause"X0
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Lupara on December 08, 2004, 06:05:30 AM
Hmmm...after seeing this video clip, I think I might need to reasses my view of Chelsea.
Those tits are amazing. I still prefer big naturals like Nadine, Lorna and Kerry Marie, though.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TAYLORSTEVENS on December 08, 2004, 06:41:04 AM
Quote:

Hmmm...after seeing this video clip, I think I might need to reasses my view of Chelsea.
Those tits are amazing. I still prefer big naturals like Nadine, Lorna and Kerry Marie, though.  





wow talk about a merry xmas  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 08, 2004, 12:22:39 PM
Quote:

Excellent!  Thank you for sharing.  Does a memebr of her site still hang out here, like Hentaibee?  And would any member of her site know if there's more inside?

That kind of tease could really increase membership!

CHEERS!  




at the moment there are MAGNIFICENT Expo snapshots from chelsea's booth. and a HOT (funny titfight with crystal gunns) preview clip of next years DVD

recommended.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Grasshopper_ on December 08, 2004, 12:32:35 PM
WOW  CC has been one of my favorites  

----REMOVED BY THOUGHT POLICE-----
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: G_I_John on December 08, 2004, 01:14:53 PM
Ho, Ho, H-OH MY GOD she's amazing

G_I "Miss Charms, I've been a good lil' boy this year ." _John  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on December 08, 2004, 01:37:18 PM
Danger Will robinson!
Danger Will Robinson!

That picture is copyright Photoclubs and you must take it down right away before the thought police come and get us all!!  

POST HASTE PLEASE!
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on December 08, 2004, 02:56:22 PM
Give the mods a break!  They are not policing your thoughts, just covering themselves from a lawsuit when someone posts material that they have no rights to.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: EgregiousSamuel on December 08, 2004, 05:01:45 PM
Oh. My. Lord!  

"Is she getting bigger?"
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 08, 2004, 05:22:06 PM
I also like the way she sucked on the candy cane in the clip  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 08, 2004, 05:44:54 PM
reminded me of her toytime dvd scene....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on December 08, 2004, 07:23:52 PM
She is stretching that Santa outfit to the max.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 08, 2004, 10:38:31 PM
If the elves misbehave she can:

1) Smother them in her cleavage

2) Smack them around with her tits  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrEff on December 08, 2004, 11:15:14 PM
Quote:

If the elves misbehave she can:

1) Smother them in her cleavage

2) Smack them around with her tits  





Oooohh.... can I BE a bad elf???
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Lupara on December 08, 2004, 11:38:01 PM
I just saw her naked (I think for the first time, but if not it only just sunk in) and I have to retract my earlier statement in this thread and once again, take up my position that her breasts are freakish. Her nipples are wall-eyed and the veins are far too prominent. Melonie Charms, her's are still nice. I guess her string job was better.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ROBRAM89 on December 09, 2004, 09:25:53 PM
...still hasn't changed the free pic... Also, didn't see that voice coming.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sajber on December 10, 2004, 06:45:57 PM
Great clip. Yeah i also think she is getting bigger.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on December 10, 2004, 07:01:51 PM
now who thinks this would be a fitting title Chelsea Charms XXX-Mas Special... hmmm, anyone agree? even though she does softcore things but, it's all gravy though!   mmm graaavy... thanks for sharing and nice ava HB
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 10, 2004, 07:48:14 PM
Quote:

Great clip. Yeah i also think she is getting bigger.  




DUH ! most obvious thing EVER. :-)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on December 12, 2004, 03:00:00 PM
Quote:

I just saw her naked (I think for the first time, but if not it only just sunk in) and I have to retract my earlier statement in this thread and once again, take up my position that her breasts are freakish. Her nipples are wall-eyed and the veins are far too prominent. Melonie Charms, her's are still nice. I guess her string job was better.  




Thank you.  Actually I believe the only fundamental difference is the amount of string different girls originally had put in, and the different elasticity of different girls' breast skin allowing for easier/more uniform stretching as the string balls expanded.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 12, 2004, 07:59:44 PM
bump  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 12, 2004, 08:26:56 PM
Quote:

OH MY !!!!!   Instant hard-on while watching this brief video clip.  She is pushing her red outfit to its limits !

http://www.chelseacharms.com/home.html

Scroll down to video link:

"Click for a Message from Chelsea's Holiday Workshop"


Christmas will cum early if I see more pics and/or clips of her in that outfit :-)  




Tina Angel as a naughty Ms. Claus

http://www.tina-angel.de/weihnachten2003.htm  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 12, 2004, 09:03:16 PM
Chelsea makes any girl look tiny.
That's her business :-) !
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Duck_n_Cover on December 12, 2004, 11:02:21 PM
Quote:

   She has really big breasts.  

     




best forum commentary graphic ever
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Boob_maniac on December 13, 2004, 03:56:35 AM
Maybe I will sound weird but I am intrigued about some things. First, how can Chelsea support this amazing breasts? Second, what is the kind of implants she have? (I suppose that is implant.)

Thank for your answers.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Medical on December 13, 2004, 05:47:17 AM
Quote:

Maybe I will sound weird but I am intrigued about some things. First, how can Chelsea support this amazing breasts? Second, what is the kind of implants she have? (I suppose that is implant.)

Thank for your answers.  




Chelsea had (saline?) implants prior to these string implants.  Hopefully that answers both questions.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 13, 2004, 12:51:02 PM
go to her site, read her FAQ.
easy as that.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ROBRAM89 on December 13, 2004, 08:33:10 PM
Quote:

best forum commentary graphic ever




I beg to differ.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Duck_n_Cover on December 13, 2004, 11:31:07 PM
Quote:

Quote:

best forum commentary graphic ever




I beg to differ.  


 
 INTERNET: SERIOUS BUSINESS
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 16, 2004, 09:51:06 PM
The images are starting in her members area. (the fanfair pics will come at a later time, it seems). first you get fantastic XMas special

and the good folks added dates of when there will be updates.

complainers TAKE THIS :P

join now if you havent already!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 16, 2004, 09:57:51 PM
Naughty or nice ?    

 



 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on December 17, 2004, 03:17:36 AM
  So can you post a sample or what?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Lupara on December 17, 2004, 09:09:11 AM
Quote:


Thank you.  Actually I believe the only fundamental difference is the amount of string different girls originally had put in, and the different elasticity of different girls' breast skin allowing for easier/more uniform stretching as the string balls expanded.  



Your welcome. When I first saw a picture of you cooking (in the big boobs and cooking thread from months ago) I couldn't believe my eyes. Are you planning on posting more pictures any time soon? Preferably of you in the kitchen. That makes me hot.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 21, 2004, 05:00:04 PM
Quote:

  So can you post a sample or what?  




Enjoy !

 


 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: 7803197066 on December 23, 2004, 06:21:10 PM
thx for info and samples mates!!! unfortunately thisi is my first post in this forum, but i have checked it from couple of years.... all of u did a great site and a great job for the BE fans... how many times i wished to become a member of the non-free part of the site, but the sad truth is that for a user from bulgaria the only possible thing is to read others posts and to wait for some samples.... BUT to be a titlover is a deed proud, so users like me shall never surrender  

once again - i'm thankful because of the existing of such a community... have a nice christmas all of u, wish u luck during the 2005!!! hope that some day i will be able to share something with u...

yours: chelsea lover
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Googie on December 23, 2004, 09:11:50 PM
Good God, what a sexy Mrs. Claus she is. I mean, damn.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 23, 2004, 09:50:17 PM
the next update is on her site already!

I know you saw tis comming from me, but

HOORAY for Chelsea charms

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on December 23, 2004, 10:00:56 PM
Post deleted by BuffaloJack
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 24, 2004, 02:08:56 AM
Post deleted by Hentaibee
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on December 24, 2004, 02:53:09 AM
Post deleted by BuffaloJack
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 24, 2004, 02:59:24 AM
I infatuated with huge boobs in general [HELLO, did you see my website?]...

I've  learned to surpress my unasked for negativity.
Thats all. Dont take it if you dont like it. I'm here to stay.

cheers.

Merry Xmas Jack.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on December 29, 2004, 06:15:59 PM
Quote:

Quote:

  So can you post a sample or what?  




Enjoy !

   




** slurp **

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 31, 2004, 03:19:01 AM
sorry. fanboy-hood took over.
off course she escorts and I see why, there is good money...

http://www.boobstand.com/escorts/chelsea2.html
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on December 31, 2004, 03:26:30 AM
.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: foegs on December 31, 2004, 03:47:36 AM
Hmm . . . How to explain this with tact?  Nope.  Can't.

DATY=Dining At The Y, or perhaps more appropriately at the (Y).  Cunnilingus, I believe is the most accurate word.  You can eat her out, to be crude.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JizzTits on December 31, 2004, 09:48:22 AM
wow, i didn't know it was anything more than the lap dance and some touching.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on December 31, 2004, 10:02:37 AM
Quote:

I think Chelsea is fortunate in that she is in a unique situation. The shear size of her breasts means that despite her limits, the bad reviews and everything else that is said about her people are still tempted. If If her boobs were a touch smaller, she would be in direct competition with several other women and i reckon she would struggle to earn money unless she upped her game. The only reason I am considering seeing her the next time I'm in the States is because she is unique,





I'm trying extremely hard to phrase my response in the most professional manner possible.  Let me begin by commenting that prior to Chelsea's arrival on the huge boob scene in 1999, other girls held the title of 'Queen of Huge Boobs' - thus my response is meant to apply to whoever happened to be the current 'titleholder' at a given time and not specifically to Chelsea.

With that said, you are absolutely correct that a large segment of fans/customers in the huge boobs genre do focus on the girl with the absolutely biggest tits.  When faced with limited financial resources, a large segment of fans/customers in the huge boobs genre will choose to spend their money on a magazine or website membership or 'private session' which brings them in contact (figuratively or literally) with the biggest boobs in the business - nonwithstanding any competitive valuation versus other girls also offering magazine appearances or website memberships or 'private sessions' but with smaller boobs.  This phenomenon always has and always will place the titleholder of 'the girl with the absolutely biggest boobs in the business' in the position of always having a ready market for whatever magazine content or whatever website content or whatever 'private session' content she chooses to offer, and at whatever price she chooses to set (within some bounds of reason).

In the 'good old days' of huge boobs, i.e. the 90's, huge breast implants were not so difficult or expensive to obtain.  Thus there was financial incentive for an active 'competition' between girls to obtain ever larger breast implants in hopes of clinching the 'title' and therefore enjoy the financial advantages of becoming the current 'titleholder'.

However, with the demise of String implants and the FDA ban on custom made implants, today it is assumed that no girl can successfully challenge Chelsea for the 'title'.  Thus the financial incentive for other girls to continue striving for ever larger breast implants has been greatly reduced - regardless of whether a girl has 2000 or 3000 or 4000cc's today she will still find herself competing boob to boob with other girls who are totally comfortable doing XXX and and offering full service escorting.  

At the same time, as the current 'titleholder', Chelsea is free to offer as much or as little as she chooses, at whatever price she chooses to set, with a virtually guaranteed stream of paying customers willing to spend their money for access to 'the biggest boobs in the business'.  In general business terms this is referred to as a 'market monopoly'.  As we all know from dealings with other 'market monopolies' such as the local power company, getting a 'good deal for your money' does not necessarily play a role in the transaction.  But you will get what you are seeking - in this case access to the 'absolutely biggest boobs in the business' !

Quote:

take away that uniqueness and given all i have read and been told I wouldn't bother wasting my money. i don't see her approach changing, which is unfortunate, as there is no sign that she will losse her unique selling point anytime in the near future.




Well, if another girl were actually able to successfully make an attempt to clinch the 'title' away from Chelsea, then the 'market monopoly' business dynamic which Chelsea has enjoyed for the past several years might indeed change very quickly !    

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 31, 2004, 10:39:14 AM
Melonie phrased it very well.
If a person is comfortable with it they should do it by all means if it helps fundraising. Nothing wrong with that. The monopoly improves her business position drastically :-) and that's a good thing in this industry.

Also note, some of the the runner-ups aparently do very well...just look at Teddi Barrett's dvd sales....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on December 31, 2004, 10:57:05 AM
Quote:

The monopoly improves her business position drastically :-) and that's a good thing in this industry.




As a matter of strictly personal opinion from a business standpoint, I'm not sure that this is actually the case.  For example, it could be argued that the long-standing monopoly serves as a DIS-incentive for new girls to strive for larger breast implants.  This is based on the assumption that no new girl could possibly have the ideological dedication and financial resources to go through with enough sets of custom made implants and enough surgeries with huge implant specialist plastic surgeons to actually approach Chelsea's implant size and thus make a serious challenge for the 'title'.


It could also be argued that the long-standing monopoly has altered the financial structure of the huge boobs business such that it is exceedingly hard for any girl to succeed financially despite having 2000 or 3000 or 4000cc implants unless she is willing to offer XXX (i.e. your example of Teddi Barrett) and/or full blown escort services, which has kept many potential new girls who are not comfortable doing XXX or escorting from entering the huge boobs business in a serious way.  As an example of the change in emphasis away from breast size and toward the XXX element I would offer Tiffany Towers' recent return to huge boobs video (even though her current breast size is nowhere near as huge as it once was) and also the gradual shift in content of Score magazine.  IMHO a future so-called big boobs industry which is primarily comprised of girls with 800-1200cc implants or girls with natural F cups doing XXX across the board is NOT the same industry which brought us a Busty Dusty or a Chesty Love in the early 90's (i.e. where huge boobs, slim and stacked glamour mattered much much more than sex).  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: spid on December 31, 2004, 11:09:24 AM
It does make you wonder what the eventually shake out will be when Chelsa retires/has her implants reduced.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 31, 2004, 11:20:37 AM
Yeah. It looks like big boobs are going 'Out' lately
:-(

big natural XXX is sooooo mainstream.

The more a reason to cherrish the wave of models we have in the current generation.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on December 31, 2004, 11:30:37 AM
Quote:

OK, but let's be honest. Chelsea and other big ladies are most certainly the main attractions of a well known sponsor programme and sell bigtime there.

We need more people like them or Sc&regroup to push the niche marketign harder... only then we will see more huge models. Its all about the almight green dollar in he end.





Not to go too far towards 'Wall Street', but there is a well known adage about businesses which have 'an increasing share of a declining market' ...

To put it bluntly, the 'niche' you refer to is in fact declining.  Thus the popular multi-girl website and popular huge boobs magazine you refer to can only 'push' so hard.  IMHO the website in question obviously concentrates its promotional efforts toward a small handful of girls with the biggest breasts at the 'expense' of the two dozen other girls who merely have 2000 or 3000  implants (try doing several 'refreshes' on their main web page and see what happens).  Thus we are NOT likely to see many new models if they know that a month after they hit the huge boobs scene that they'll be relegated to 'row 5' of the website's main page.

The magazine in question has diversified its content such that really large breasted, slim and stacked girls are now a tiny percentage of the magazine content compared to girls with smaller breasts doing XXX.  Thus you're not likely to see that many new models if they know that after their initial magazine 'debut' that they'll likely be expected to do XXX in order to appear in subsequent issues.

Quote:

It does make you wonder what the eventually shake out will be when Chelsa retires/has her implants reduced.




... or if another huge boobs girl IS actually able to come up with new implants rivaling Chelsea's size thus making a serious challenge for her 'title'.  Things would get even more interesting if the challenger was in fact not affiliated with the website and magazine mentioned above, but perhaps affiliated instead with a totally different new big boobs magazine and website (oops!) ...

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: cynic on December 31, 2004, 12:59:18 PM
Melonie, we are and always will consider ourselves extremely fortunate to have you posting here.  You rock!

Anyoo, my question is: there are over 600 sovereign countries on this earth.  Why can't women in other nations try the silly string implants?  The FDA only controls one contry.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on December 31, 2004, 01:00:06 PM
"To put it bluntly, the 'niche' you refer to is in fact declining. Thus the popular multi-girl website and popular huge boobs magazine you refer to can only 'push' so hard. IMHO the website in question obviously concentrates its promotional efforts toward a small handful of girls with the biggest breasts at the 'expense' of the two dozen other girls who merely have 2000 or 3000 implants (try doing several 'refreshes' on their main web page and see what happens). Thus we are NOT likely to see many new models if they know that a month after they hit the huge boobs scene that they'll be relegated to 'row 5' of the website's main page. "

Do the dancers/models that get giant implants really consider what row of a multigirl website, or what page in a magazine they will be on before making this type of move?
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: lechacal on December 31, 2004, 01:14:20 PM


... or if another huge boobs girl IS actually able to come up with new implants rivaling Chelsea's size thus making a serious challenge for her 'title'.  Things would get even more interesting if the challenger was in fact not affiliated with the website and magazine mentioned above, but perhaps affiliated instead with a totally different new big boobs magazine and website (oops!) ...

 
 




Happy new year Melonie! and to all members really interesting posts...i agree with all you said...the main challenger is Keisha and we all know she is affiliated with the same website and magazine...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 31, 2004, 02:34:57 PM
Quote:

"To put it bluntly, the 'niche' you refer to is in fact declining. Thus the popular multi-girl website and popular huge boobs magazine you refer to can only 'push' so hard. IMHO the website in question obviously concentrates its promotional efforts toward a small handful of girls with the biggest breasts at the 'expense' of the two dozen other girls who merely have 2000 or 3000 implants (try doing several 'refreshes' on their main web page and see what happens). Thus we are NOT likely to see many new models if they know that a month after they hit the huge boobs scene that they'll be relegated to 'row 5' of the website's main page. "

Do the dancers/models that get giant implants really consider what row of a multigirl website, or what page in a magazine they will be on before making this type of move?
 




either way money is a good incentive, but Melonie is right.. niche is declining
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on December 31, 2004, 02:42:41 PM
The market for big boob Feature dancer fees is declining, but I am not sure the niche is. The pool of talent is shrinking.  I think this is due to the trend that Club owner's slowed down bringing in Giant boobed girls and paying them big fees, and went to XXX stars, or no features at all.  These things are cyclical.  You really think boob freaks, stopped liking big boobs?  Thank goodness they still have magazines and websites, or there would be even less money to be made by these wonderful ladies.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 31, 2004, 02:45:57 PM
There will be a new breed of boob fans every year. sometimes more sometimes less. it is cyclic indeed.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on December 31, 2004, 03:27:52 PM
Quote:

Do the dancers/models that get giant implants really consider what row of a multigirl website, or what page in a magazine they will be on before making this type of move?


I don't think that Melonie meant that literally. The point is that unless a girl has the biggest bust, you are inevitably relegated to the status of also-ran, out of the spotlight and thus not in a position to make a decent living.

And what Melonie says about the niche is also sensible. Even though the number of big bust fans has not decreased, the money has. With internet access becoming freely available girls are far more accessible for far less expenditure. Some of the mystery has gone.

The expectation that this content shuuld be avilable cheap or even free (with all the galleries of pirated materials) means that fans are no longer willing to spend the kind of money required to sustain the industry as it was in the 80's/early 90's.

Unless a new revenue stream opens up for these girls, the pool of talent will shrink. While it can be argued that the increase in escorting wth its higher financial rewards is a new revenue stream, there are many girls who do not feel comfortable with making a living this way.

In the end it's down to the fans and their money which determines the size of the industry.

As an aside, it's nice to participate in a thread with intelligent dicussion which doesn't degenerate into namecalling and mudslinging.

Pixeltiger
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on December 31, 2004, 03:37:54 PM
"I don't think that Melonie meant that literally. The point is that unless a girl has the biggest bust, you are inevitably relegated to the status of also-ran, out of the spotlight and thus not in a position to make a decent living."

I have a difficult time believing Crystal Gunns, for example, is not in a position to make a decent living. She is certainly not the biggest. She has a unique look, and a great body, and I bet she does quite well.  

Here is her Schedule:  Not escorting , but Featuring, or being paid by a Magazine to be a spokesmodel.

December 8- 11
GALLAGHER'S
Queens, N.Y.

---------------------------------------------------

December 15 - 18
MARIO'S SHOWPLACE
DUO ACT WITH BARBIE BENNET
aka TEXAS BARBIE
Webster, Mass

---------------------------------------------------

December 20 - 24
FRANK'S CHICKEN HOUSE
Manville, New Jersey

---------------------------------------------------

January 5 -9
LOOK FOR ME AT THE SCORE BOOTH
AVN CONVENTION - Las Vegas NV

---------------------------------------------------

February 2 - 5
SOLID PLATINUM
Lexington, Kentucky
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: southy on December 31, 2004, 03:39:17 PM
Slightly off topic,but atm the "natural" side of this business seems to be on a high,mostly down to Daktari and Nadine.
(Nothing to do with private dances etc though.)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ac man on December 31, 2004, 03:46:17 PM
case in point to what melodie is saying, i watched howard stern last nite, the episode entitled, "BUTTAFACED" girls with great bods, but ugly faces. they rated each one of them with a bag on their heads, so as to rate the body only, then had them take off their bag and rate their face.
most wernt that ugly to me, anyway, back to boobs. their were a few girls there with enhanced boobs, and they were downgraded because of that, to me it made their bodies look much better. i guess the mainstream is like mel has said, the big boob look is in decline, such a shame.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on December 31, 2004, 03:49:18 PM
"i guess the mainstream is like mel has said, the big boob look is in decline, such a shame. "

I don't think Mel said the look is in decline, she said the state of the industry is. Howard Stern has people on to ridicule them.  Don't think that is an indicator of what people like.  Didn't you like the bigger boobs?
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 31, 2004, 05:03:01 PM
to give it a lightheearted note... I blame Paris Hilton .
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ac man on December 31, 2004, 07:16:14 PM
sure i love the big boobs, bigger the better, as the saying goes, but it seems to me that the popularity in the masses of big boob lovers is not what it used to be. even howard stern used to have huge boobed strippers on his show, maybe still does, but have not seen any of them on there for a long time.
i know he exploits the guests there, thats his thing.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on December 31, 2004, 08:33:17 PM
Howard is a Shock Jock. I guess, after years of seeing the big girls on Jerry Springer, Sally Jesse, Christina, etc. It is just not that shocking anymore to see giant breasted girls. He may have them on, but then he would make them strip naked, ridicule them, and then let some **29** throw cupcakes at their breasts.  

Can you think of a Big Boob Feature that would stoop to that?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on December 31, 2004, 09:33:40 PM
I'm the last one to say thism, but Sttern has overdone it... turning from good old fun to righ-out mockery over the years... maybe he cant compete with MTV? lol
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ac man on December 31, 2004, 10:21:44 PM
yes i agree, dont know why i even watch stern, guess its the faint hope i can still see a big busted babe or two there.
score group needs to make a big boob channell, they sure have enough video in their archives for it. if playboy can do it, score could also. i know its just wishful thinking, but one can hope, right?  you all have a great new year, full of huge boobs and fun.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on January 01, 2005, 09:07:23 AM
Quote:

I guess, after years of seeing the big girls on Jerry Springer, Sally Jesse, Christina, etc. It is just not that shocking anymore to see giant breasted girls. He may have them on, but then he would make them strip naked, ridicule them, and then let some **29** throw cupcakes at their breasts.

Can you think of a Big Boob Feature that would stoop to that?




This is off topic I suppose, but the Stern show and other TV shows do illustrate the basic changes which have taken place between the mid-90's and today in regards to the mainstream 'market' for huge boobed girls - they are now basically considered to be 'freaks' thus the objects of ridicule as opposed to the ultra-feminine phenomenon of the mid-90's.  Stern and other TV shows also illustrate the migration towards more and more sex (i.e. Stern's fascination with lesbian sex and outrageous porn star anecdotes).  Bottom line here is that TV producers study what is selling and what is not, and adjust their content accordingly !


Quote:

I have a difficult time believing Crystal Gunns, for example, is not in a position to make a decent living. She is certainly not the biggest. She has a unique look, and a great body, and I bet she does quite well.




Of course I can't speak for Crystal or any other big boobs feature, other than to say that spending two or three weeks on the road month in and month out is VERY HARD WORK.  Whether or not a girl considers all of those hours spent travelling and performing to be a 'decent living' compared to the net amount of money they earn is in individual judgement.

I would, however, point out that in Crystal's case the website cross-promotion done on her behalf by Chelsea Charms, the Chelsea+Crystal videos, the Chelsea+Crystal publicity at various industry events etc. definitely  places Crystal in a unique situation versus any other girl with equal or larger breasts who is not receiving this sort of extra help from the girl with the 'biggest boobs in the business' (as well as Chelsea's feature booking agent, webmaster, and business contacts).  It's very difficult to speculate how successful Crystal's career might or might not be were she making her own way in the business without the extra help from Chelsea and Chelsea's business contacts, as any other new big boobs feature/model would have to do.  For example, it's  impossible to know for certain whether or not the photographers who will be shooting pictures of Crystal at the upcoming AVN convention would be shooting just as many pictures were Chelsea not standing next to Crystal.

Please understand that in making these comments I'm not being negative towards Crystal in any way.  I'm simply pointing out that Crystal's uniquely fortunate association with Chelsea greatly skews the validity of you attempt to compare Crystal's breast size versus career success to the potential success of other girls with similar 'attributes' to Crystals, but who would not have that same uniquely fortunate business association to the girl with 'the biggest boobs in the business' available to jump-start and continually assist their careers.

Coming back on topic, I would also point out that Crystal has advertised her availability for "private sessions" in the past, probably indicating that like Chelsea she also  realizes where the 'real' money is to be made while on the road.
 

Quote:

Slightly off topic,but atm the "natural" side of this business seems to be on a high




I would make the case that the 'natural' side of this business SEEMS to be on a high only because the huge breast implant side of this business is on such a low !  Obviously it is much easier for a girl with natural large breasts to enter the business because no investment is necessary on her part other than appearing in front of a camera.  Magazines and video producers looking for 'new big busted girls' now have little choice besides turning to girls with natural large breasts, since so few girls are willing/able to invest the large amounts of time and money necessary to obtain large breast implants !

Of course Rhiannon has announced that she is now willing to actively help any new girls seeking large breast implants.  One could assume without much speculation that part of the reason for this is to cultivate new slim & stacked girls with large breast implants for Cleavage magazine, rather than having to rely on girls with large natural breasts to provide 'new talent' (as other big boob magazines are increasingly doing).


Quote:

score group needs to make a big boob channell, they sure have enough video in their archives for it. if playboy can do it, score could also. i know its just wishful thinking, but one can hope, right?




Yes it is just wishful thinking !  Score can't even attract enough paying huge boob loving customers to stage the Boob Cruise at a profit any more !  There's simply no way that anyone in the mainstream financial/entertainment industry could buy into the idea that a big boob cable channel could attract enough paying customers to cover the overhead and turn a profit.

If you look at the programming schedule of the pay-per-view cable channels (i.e. TEN), you'll see that of all the movies which they offer in a one week period maybe two or at most three of them (out of perhaps 50 movies total) are big boobs oriented XXX.  This gives some idea of the relative size and relative income potential of the big boobs XXX audience compared to the potential audience for mainstream XXX.  Now take away the XXX and try just selling the big boobs a la Playboy ...
 

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Knives on January 01, 2005, 09:47:43 AM
the only big boob model ive ever seen in person is jessica justice and shes not all that impressive(i walked out after 10 minutes of her ignoring my 20$ bill and then she broke out the candlewax) very disappointing. but given the opportunity to see somebody like chelsea or keisha or any of the various other beautiful ladies that frequent the forum, id be grateful to no end. chelsea is only trying to make a living and i agree that she could be a little less professional about it, but if you do it as often as im sure she is, im sure it becomes a little routine.

i have actually seen chelsea pre-implants, and can honestly say she was as hot then as she could ever be now. she has definitely got one of the more beautiful faces among big boob stars that i have ever seen. as far as im concerned, she didnt need implants to make a fortune, she could have done it on her intelligence alone(which i guarantee you she has) i guess im done ranting now. can i get an AMEN? lol
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 01, 2005, 01:51:55 PM
Hey Knives, how about posting a pre-implant pic, if you have one??  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 01, 2005, 02:45:02 PM
Of course I can't speak for Crystal or any other big boobs feature, other than to say that spending two or three weeks on the road month in and month out is VERY HARD "WORK. Whether or not a girl considers all of those hours spent travelling and performing to be a 'decent living' compared to the net amount of money they earn is in individual judgement. "

Yes, but this is what Feature dancers, rock stars, and stand up commedians do, right?

"It's very difficult to speculate how successful Crystal's career might or might not be were she making her own way in the business without the extra help from Chelsea and Chelsea's business contacts, as any other new big boobs feature/model would have to do. For example, it's impossible to know for certain whether or not the photographers who will be shooting pictures of Crystal at the upcoming AVN convention would be shooting just as many pictures were Chelsea not standing next to Crystal. "


I agree with your last statement, but do you think a club owner would book a dancer because they know the "Biggest Boobs in the Business?"  How does that bring guys through the door to buy booze?  Chelsea does mostly private dances, and rarely does magazines, so I don't know how that gets Crystal in the door with club owners, or how it gets her gigs for the Big boob magazines. I agree being with Chelsea raises your profile no matter who you are, but don't you think Crystal deserves at least little of the credit?

How about Harmony Bliss for example? Is she an also-ran that can't make a decent living as a big boob dancer? Or Vixen?  How about Melonie Charm?  Why go through the hassle if you don't make a decent living?  I say none of the ladies I mentioned are also-rans.  I bet each one of them has figured out a way to make a living using their bigger than life assets to attract paying customers (w/o escorting)(dancing, Ifriends, magazines, websites, spokesmodelling, etc) I am not saying the same money is there now as was in the go go 80s and early 90s, but logic would say that you must make more money with the boobs than without them.  

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 01, 2005, 05:46:21 PM
Crystal has done very good thing on her own.
Being buddies/affiliated with Chelsea is just a fantastic extra push.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tarkus on January 01, 2005, 06:03:22 PM
agree that this is one of the more interesting threads i've read in quite sometime.

i suppose it's a good thing that i'm not the norm; not only do i have no desire to part with several hundred dollars in this fashion, i seldom go to the clubs either.  looking at the pics - usually for free - is enough to keep me content.  but i do recognize that attitude doesn't pay the bills... hence my original remark.

regardless, good luck on your upcoming session.  i hope it's better than you'll be expecting based on the remarks in this thread.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on January 01, 2005, 07:37:35 PM
Quote:

I agree being with Chelsea raises your profile no matter who you are, but don't you think Crystal deserves at least little of the credit?




Please reread my post, which specifically stated that I was not trying to be negative about Crystal in any way.  But for a fact it is impossible to tell how much of her career success would still have happened if she had never hooked up with Chelsea.

It's also coincidental that you should mention Harmony Bliss.  If you will recall, she came upon the big boobs scene at almost exactly the same time as Crystal.  But after her initial magazine appearances and doing some modeling work with PhotoClubs and Rhiannon, Harmony was still working in 'local' clubs to make ends meet.  Vixen was also working in a 'local' club as well as several other 'odd jobs' to make ends meet.  Keisha also commented here that she was not earning enough money to afford new larger implants even if she could find them.  I would contend that your across the board assumption that any new big boobs girl will be able to make 'a decent living' in the big boobs business today without resorting to XXX or escorting is apparently only true in the case of Crystal - who 'coincidentally' is also the only girl in this group with business affiliations to the girl with the 'biggest boobs in the business'.  In fairness to Crystal's hard work though, she is also the only girl in this group who is working on the road 30+ weeks out of the year, a herculean effort that only someone who has actually done this themselves can fully understand.  But in fairness to the other girls in this group, Crystal is also the only one who has advertised her availability for "private sessions".

In my own case, I don't know whether you've noticed that I have shut down my pay website.  I undertook this decision based on the rising costs and complexities of continuing to operate a single girl adult website versus the website's non-rising income.  I am fortunate in that I was able to earn some decent money under the much more favorable big boob business conditions which existed in the 90's, and also have been fortunate to have invested that money well, such that I'm financially independent at this point.  Unfortunately for new girls, it would be impossible for them to do today what I was able to do in the 90's given today's big boob business conditions, changes in the internet, adult business regulations etc.  


 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Elliot James on January 01, 2005, 09:03:02 PM
"Score can't even attract enough paying huge boob loving customers to stage the Boob Cruise at a profit any more !"

Hi Melonie, Happy New Year. I estimate about 75%-80% of the passengers on Boob Cruise #5 in 2000 were returnees from previous Cruises. Most of them would sign on immediately if we were to launch another Cruise. My point is that attracting enough passengers is easy. The person who has organized the Cruises is Suzuyo Fox and Sue's been very busy with other projects at SCORE since 2000. It takes a full year to set up a Cruise and the logistics are very complex plus international travel has become much more complicated since 911. Also, importantly, SCORE overall has been working in other directions. If we never have another Cruise, we still created an interesting chapter in big-boobed entertainment with five of them.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 01, 2005, 09:52:33 PM
I didn't mean to imply that you were saying anything "bad" about Crystal. I just questioned whether being good buddies with Chelsea Charms gets her booked in clubs and paid for shoots for magazines.  

 
 
Quote:

 "It's also coincidental that you should mention Harmony Bliss. If you will recall, she came upon the big boobs scene at almost exactly the same time as Crystal. But after her initial magazine appearances and doing some modeling work with PhotoClubs and Rhiannon, Harmony was still working in 'local' clubs to make ends meet. Vixen was also working in a 'local' club as well as several other 'odd jobs' to make ends meet. Keisha also commented here that she was not earning enough money to afford new larger implants even if she could find them. I would contend that your across the board assumption that any new big boobs girl will be able to make 'a decent living' in the big boobs business today without resorting to XXX or escorting is apparently only true in the case of Crystal"
 



I believe working in local clubs provides a 'decent living', especially if you have the biggest boobs in the club. It is news to me as I didn't know Harmony, Vixen, and Keisha might be having a hard time making ends meet and are not able to make a decent living as adult entertainers/models. I suppose "decent living" is subjective.  If you are saying that you can't make the money you could back in the day by having huge boobs, then we totally agree. If you are saying these ladies would be better off without the boobs and could make the same income without them, then we disagree.  

Quote:

In my own case, I don't know whether you've noticed that I have shut down my pay website.  




I did notice that, but thought it was due to Ashcroft's rules more than income reasons.  Are you still able to operate an Ifriends site profitably? If so, maybe Harmony, Vixen, and Keisha could give that a try.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 01, 2005, 10:31:56 PM
Harmony Bliss IS doing webcams ! Didnt you see her holidays greetings post here at BEA :-) ?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 01, 2005, 10:33:07 PM
Oops!  Great, maybe she is making some cash with those boobs after all!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tiggo on January 01, 2005, 10:57:58 PM
great thread, wanted to add 3 points

1.  IMHO, the big natural scene is so "high" right now because of the attitudes of most big naturals.  

For the most part, they are young, flirty, teasing, cute, sweet and semi-innocent, as opposed to girls like Rhiannon and Teddi Barrett.  I've got nothing against the latter, but one has to admit there is a STARK difference of attitudes.  I believe this is important. And to those in disbelief, please search the BEA forums for my poll concerning natural or implanted chests....

2.  I just wanted to thank Eliot James for stopping by (it's been a long time since I've seen a post from him) and I wanted to thank him for his magazine.  And to say that if he could to bring back the Boob Cruise.

3.  There's nothing wrong with escorting.  So many real women have one-night stands, what is the big deal about escorting?  Some people seem to love to insinuate that it is some great evil when it's really not.  If a girl has to work a little harder just because she's not the "biggest in the business", well, there's a lot of guys out there who will appreciate it and her.   And again, I say, personality goes a long way.....




 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ApesMa on January 02, 2005, 12:08:12 AM
Quote:

I don't think that Melonie meant that literally. The point is that unless a girl has the biggest bust, you are inevitably relegated to the status of also-ran, out of the spotlight and thus not in a position to make a decent living.




Agreed; that's true in just about any field. As communication improves and population increases, so does competition--you can't be the big fish in the little pond nearly as easily.

A century ago, you could be, say, a pretty good guitarist and probably make a decent living in your area. Now, it's trivial to walk a few blocks, or click on a mouse, and hear Christopher Parkening, or Joe Satriani, or any of a list of guitarists with better chops than the rest of us could dream of having with a lifetime of work. Also, the larger the population, the more likely it is that there will be people who have extremely desirable attributes in multiple areas--so, for example, you see record companies pushing virtuosos who are also sex symbols. A homely violinist, however good, won't make it big when there are performers like Anne Sophie Mutter and Vanessa-Mae (or Joshua Bell for the women).

Similarly, a woman with fairly large breasts is now in competition with all the other large breasted women on earth, which will include some with extreme implants and some who are at the far end of the bell curve--the larger the population is, the more of the latter there will be, and the better communication is, the faster news spreads and the easier it is for everybody to find the biggest. All it would take is one woman with truly extreme breast hypertrophy (e.g. the woman Johnny Swell sketched a while back) to decide to model (given that she avoids the problems of skin discoloration and ulceration), and Chelsea's income would plummet.

It's a great market for consumers, but tough for producers.        
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on January 02, 2005, 08:41:06 AM
Happy New Year to you as well, Elliot !

Quote:

... Sue's been very busy with other projects at SCORE since 2000. It takes a full year to set up a Cruise and the logistics are very complex plus international travel has become much more complicated since 911. Also, importantly, SCORE overall has been working in other directions. If we never have another Cruise, we still created an interesting chapter in big-boobed entertainment with five of them




As you already know, I think the world of you and of Sue Fox.  However, the fact that you have stated that Score Magazine considers 'other projects' to be a higher priority, and the fact that Score Magazine 'overall has been working in different directions' tends to support my point.  Perhaps I misspoke by stating that a new Boob Cruise could not be staged at a profit.  However it seems clear that Score is now channeling their efforts in different directions, presumably with some sort of corporate profit motive still in effect.  I would have thought that if a new Boob Cruise had a solid profit potential, that Score could have afforded to pay/hire a different organizer for it !  However, I do appreciate the new post 9/11 difficulties involved.  I also agree with you that even if there is never another Boob Cruise that Score Magazine created an indelible legacy with the original 5 Boob Cruises, which will live on as part of the 90's 'golden era' of huge boobdom.


Quote:

I believe working in local clubs provides a 'decent living', especially if you have the biggest boobs in the club. It is news to me as I didn't know Harmony, Vixen, and Keisha might be having a hard time making ends meet and are not able to make a decent living as adult entertainers/models. I suppose "decent living" is subjective.




For the record, having the 'biggest boobs' in a local club is not necessarily helpful.  While BEA visitors share a love of really big boobs, this is definitely not the case with local club customers in general.  As such, a dancer with say F or G cups in a local club may elicit negative reactions from club customers who don't like breast implants, who consider breasts larger than DD cups to be 'freakish', who have a fascination with legs or asses or pseudo-**43** or any number of attributes other than huge boobs.  Because huge boob lovers often only make up say 5% of a local club's customer base, this can definitely constitute a problem.  Truthfully ggk, I'm sure that Vixen and Harmony and myself wish that your take on the situation was the correct one !  However, in general, it isn't.


Quote:

There's nothing wrong with escorting. So many real women have one-night stands, what is the big deal about escorting? Some people seem to love to insinuate that it is some great evil when it's really not. If a girl has to work a little harder just because she's not the "biggest in the business", well, there's a lot of guys out there who will appreciate it and her. And again, I say, personality goes a long way




I also agree in principle that there's absolutely nothing wrong with a huge boobs girl or any other girl choosing to do escorting.  Hopefully there were never any implications that doing so was 'evil'.  The only area of negative comment was that when escorting and/or "private sessions" have become so widespread in the huge boobs business that a significant number huge boob loving 'customers' come to expect these services, and thus become more and more **86** to spend money on huge boob girls without receiving these services, that it becomes more and more difficult for huge boob girls who do not choose to offer these services to earn a 'decent living'.

On the flip side, if a girl IS willing to offer escort services, then the 'salability' of her escort services is not necessarily contingent on her having really huge boobs in order to do so.  Again I don't want to speak for any other girl, but I'm quite sure that for example Tiffany Towers' decision to keep working locally with 800cc implants for the past several years rather than to invest the time and money to regain her former 2500cc size (guess) was based at least in part on the fact that having 2500cc implants vs 800cc implants would not have significantly affected overall demand for her services or her overall earnings potential.

Putting these two points together brings us back to the original statement ... If a girl who is potentially thinking about getting large breast implants (but not top echelon huge) knows in advance that her ability to earn a 'decent living' will be marginal unless she chooses to offer escort services and/or "private sessions", and if that same girl knows that overall demand for her escort services will not be lacking for potential customers whether she has DD cups or G cups or J cups, then where is her financial incentive to go for breast implants any larger then DD ? (unless of course she had a serious possibility of obtaining a top echelon huge breast size - which is basically now an impossibility since the demise of string implants)


Quote:

Harmony Bliss IS doing webcams ! Didnt you see her holidays greetings post here at BEA :-) ?




Yes there is still some money to be made in Webcams.  However, IMHO the profitability of 'glamour oriented' webcams is steadily declining as more and more webcam hosts are offering more and more 'extreme' video content.  The webcam competition issue is of course similar to the issue of some girls offering escort services in a live setting, where webcam girls who are willing to offer live sex on camera raise customer expectations, and make it that much more difficult for other girls who are not willing to do the same to earn a 'decent living'.


There is also the pending issue of the new Ashcroft rules, which will reportedly require that any provider of 'live' content must post their real name, real address etc. as part of their 'live' web page or face potential prosecution under the 'Tracy Lords' law.  As such, many webcams originating in the USA may be short-lived as girls discover that in order to continue doing webcam they must now provide personal information on their webcam page which will enable any web surfer in the world to know exactly who they really are and exactly where they can be found !


       
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Knives on January 02, 2005, 08:52:14 AM
unfortunately i dont actually have any pics on my pc or anywhere else for that matter, but i will try to find the ones ive seen in the past.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 02, 2005, 11:47:00 AM
Quote:

unfortunately i dont actually have any pics on my pc or anywhere else for that matter, but i will try to find the ones ive seen in the past.  




Thanks, Knives.  It will be appreciated.  I have seen some of the smaller implant pix, in very poor resolution as well as the "dildo waterbottle fake".

Cheers!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 02, 2005, 12:00:49 PM
hmmm. thanks for the insightful replies, Melonie.

Ashcroft is the #1 reason we need more busty ladies over her in Europe, I guess...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: southy on January 02, 2005, 01:14:24 PM
One of the good things about the boob cruises is that they provided some alernative settings for photoshoots.One boob cruise might supply 10 photoshoots for a girl in various settings,say for eg chloe vevrier,some of her best pics were taken during boob cruises.Contrast that with Lindsey,i joined her site the other day (score freebie) but its very "samey".The majority of shoots are studio based.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 02, 2005, 03:28:12 PM
Big thanks for taking the time to address mine and everybody elses points.

There is a point or two I disagree with in your response Mel, since I go to strip clubs, and the girls with the biggest boobs are always busy.  Despite the slimming of the Big boob market, Harmony, Vixen, and Keisha are still at it.  

Just because I may disagree, it doesn't mean I don't want to hear a totally different perspective.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on January 03, 2005, 02:47:47 AM
Quote:

There is a point or two I disagree with in your response Mel, since I go to strip clubs, and the girls with the biggest boobs are always busy.  Despite the slimming of the Big boob market, Harmony, Vixen, and Keisha are still at it.  

Just because I may disagree, it doesn't mean I don't want to hear a totally different perspective.  




Yes, Harmony, Vixen and Kiesha are still at it.  The point, of course, being that they had already decided to work in local clubs, decided to work odd jobs etc. in order to afford making the payments on the big implants they have already gotten.  This shows a clear dedication on their own parts to the concept of getting huge boobs for their own sake, independent of practical business principles like return on investment, which is extremely rare.  Since they already have gotten the big implants, it only makes sense to continue to 'use' them.

However my point was that in the case of other potential new girls who are not as 'obsessed' with having huge boobs for their own sake, practical business principles such as return on investment may indeed serve as an obstacle towards their getting implants larger than the readily available and relatively affordable FDA approved 800cc implants.  I go into clubs all over the country, and I would agree with you that dancers who have "big" boobs i.e. implants in the 800cc range do a fair stroke of business.  However, it was not these girls I was referring to.  Instead I was talking about girls with implants in the 1200-1500cc range i.e. Harmony or Vixen prior to her last enlargement.  For girls in the 1200-1500cc size range, they often find themselves stuck in a 'no woman's land' where her breasts are large enough for many club customers to consider her 'freakishly large' compared to typical cup sizes, while at the same time their breasts are NOT large enough to be considered seriously huge in terms of the huge boobs feature/magazine/website market.

For a club dancer who already has 800cc implants who IS concerned about income and return on investment, it is extremely difficult to seriously consider investing more time and money to go any larger in the implant department given the current state of the huge boobs business.  This is particularly the case given the fact that even if she had infinite financial resources and infinite dedication to go through repeated surgeries with custom made implants, it is a virtual impossibility that she could ever get big enough to rival the 'truly huge' string implant girls and capture a share of the "big bucks" without having to escort.

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 03, 2005, 02:54:49 AM
Maybe the ladies themselves can verify that they can not make decent money with their large boobs, and it would be just as well to have D-cups.  I'm not saying you are wrong, just saying I have a hard time believing fewer people want dances from them because their boobs are too big. How 'bout it ladies, You making a decent living? Are the average girls selling more dances?

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 03, 2005, 02:59:47 AM
Well, if I'm ever lucky enough to meet the right woman (again) and
if I'm lucky enough that she shares my passion for large breasts and
if (#3) I'm lucky enough that she'd consider implants...

1200-1500 CC implants wouldn't be no man's land...they'd be THIS man's land!!  LOL

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on January 05, 2005, 07:16:50 PM
I wish that candy cane was my.......

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on January 05, 2005, 08:59:38 PM
You do know that candy canes shatter pretty easily, don't you?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 05, 2005, 09:24:43 PM
ummm. GoCubsGo..you dont realize why Chelsea called BEA freeloaders haven? Maybe you could cut down on the samples, just a little? (its kinda annoying if you're paying at her page and see a lot here)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Lburns on January 06, 2005, 12:28:59 AM
Chelsea should call the BEA her "cash cow haven", prolly made more money off people that found out about her from here and signed up on her site than any other source. lol
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 06, 2005, 12:07:48 PM
hmmmm. that is true, on the other hand. most poeple who like her cupsize are online here.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 18, 2005, 01:58:54 PM
ummmm... actually. hasnt this thread completely derailed?
The poster wanted private dance advice. nothing more and nothing less.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Balki_Bartokomous on January 19, 2005, 06:30:25 AM
Awesome thread.  Provides more hope to my 3some with Lisa Lipps and Lovette idea I had a short while ago now that I see its probable and not just possible.  Too bad it takes forever to get an email response from them.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on January 20, 2005, 05:58:37 PM
OMG - Its been quite a while since I read this thread. I guess to sum it up - Spending $750 for an hour or $450 for 1/2 hr with Chelsea Charms where you would probably have her do a lap dance for the majority of the time is probably a once in a lifetime experience. Having her smother your face your chest etc is probably something that one needs to experience.

Bottom line - Not many features out there have the equivalent of 6000-7000 cc of sweatermeat out there at the moment. (Unless we wait for Keisha) but money being the issue, as it usually is, I will weigh my priorites and keep BEA posted.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hoogleboogle on January 21, 2005, 01:16:50 AM
Melanie Charm is very intelligent. That's all I have to say.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 21, 2005, 11:14:37 AM
yes she is. but as always some statements need to be weighed against reality.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on January 22, 2005, 06:09:25 AM
Quote:

Bottom line - Not many features out there have the equivalent of 6000-7000 cc of sweatermeat out there at the moment. (Unless we wait for Keisha) but money being the issue, as it usually is, I will weigh my priorites and keep BEA posted




There you go !  14,000cc worth of boobs (theoretically) weigh just about 31 pounds !  There's your reality, financially as well as gravitationally speaking.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 22, 2005, 12:49:47 PM
Melonie -> What I meant to say is that the other ladies are intelligent girls too and any career or other decisions they make should simply be respected by the fans as well as the other models, since you know it yourself..it's already hard enough work to make a living in this industry.

By the way...did you also have a site at photoclubs in the past?

------ Well now that this thread is derailed anyway...

On the subject of natural tits models ...it certainly isnt their attitude..but the way of presentation and doing "extremely raunchy hardcore pornography"
one of the most profitable natural boob sites  today probably (?)is 'big tits round asses' from the creators of 'bangbus' [well, at least judging form the amount of monthly search enigne uses for those terms]
what sells best today seems to be umm how do I phrase that..
"a sexy guy putting his long john silver into a sexy DD boob girl between 21 and 25 at full force and doing every position out there..."
which at times looks pretty gross  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on January 22, 2005, 02:29:40 PM
Quote:

By the way...did you also have a site at photoclubs in the past?




Yes ... Sable Holiday and I both had former 'subsites' with PhotoClubs.  We both chose to amicably sever that business relationship a couple of years ago, as we disagreed with certain changes in PhotoClubs promotional policies which increasingly placed great emphasis on absolute breast size and in turn placed very little emphasis on pic quality and/or actual newness of pics and videos.

Quote:

On the subject of natural tits models ...it certainly isnt their attitude..but the way of presentation and doing "extremely raunchy hardcore pornography"
one of the most profitable natural boob sites today ...




Well this has been previously discussed in a roundabout way as well. Point #1 if a girl doesn't have boobs huge enough to compete for the prioritized 'upper echelon' business of huge tit lovers, the ability to sell 'smaller breasted' content is immensely affected by other aspects of that content such as XXX, raunch etc.  Point #2 girls with large natural breasts are much easier to find than girls with large (but not upper echelon huge) implanted breasts.  Point #3 girls with large natural breasts do not have to recover any implant investment thus they can work 'cheaper' and still turn a profit.  Point #4 the big  boob fetish market is very small compared to the XXX market in general, such that girls with large but not upper echelon huge breasts, either natural or implanted, face marginal income potential at best if they don't offer XXX content (previously noted exception still being an exception).


Quote:

The poster wanted private dance advice. nothing more and nothing less




In that vein (no pun intended), getting a private dance or booking a private session with Chelsea is truly a UNIQUE  experience.  No girl on the planet has a higher ratio of breast size to the rest of her body, and given the demise of string implants no girl is ever likely to.  Besides this, Chelsea is an absolutely sweetheart.  I've hefted Chelsea's boobs myself, and believe me they will leave an indelible impression (again no pun intended).

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 22, 2005, 02:58:03 PM
Yeah I remember seeing the snapshots of you meeting her at a club somewhere in her paysite's archives.

A boob dancer giving boobdance advice. That just rocks ;-)

naturals -> yes. that certainly figures. they get a lot of big naturals from eastern Europe, I guess...
someone needs to make implants popular there *sigh*
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on January 22, 2005, 09:34:33 PM
I guess I am going through a faze but I am finding that I am starting to get disgusted by the mega implanted girls who look odd.  I was a member at chelseacharms.com and I have to say that(unless the pic was clothed) that she just doesn't do it for me anymore.  I am finding more and more that the naturals are the ones turning my head lately. (or at least the ones who appear natural)   Nadine, milena Ewa,Miriam and most recently someone posted about subbie.  These are the ones who get my heart thumpuing lately.    Im sorry but for me personally seeing Chelsea naked is really rather disgusting.  She has just gotten too big and it wouldnt surprise me if she is close to having a major disaster with her implants and skin.  I mean her skin looks FREAKY.  

i am not bashing Chelsea.  Obviously she has a crowd she caters to.  Im just wondering if I am the only one who used to be a fan and isn't anymore.  

Jack
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 22, 2005, 09:48:00 PM
You knew I as avid fan of big big big and bigger boobs would react promptly, didnt you...

First of all if you like big boobs you really cant focus greatly on one model, as there are many girls who deserve our attention and money.

well, I for one,appreciate ALL kinds of boobs. (how notorious is that for someone at BEarchive)
Big or not fake or not very big.
The whole spectrum for normal B cups here in Holland to big naturals and implants on this side of the big pond and in USA...
going even further in Japanese Art (and well, my art).
In a boobfetish-fan's view Chelsea certainly isnt the end of the scale. Not looking like an everyday woman in the chest department is a part of her career.
She just defines the border between reality and fantasy
(I think we discussed that here already some time ago.)
(and the Breast Expansion phenomenon in real life, off course). And she does it in style. (not to bash anyone but maybe you've heard of Lolo Ferrari and how SHE promoted herself?)
And that alone makes her pretty much  awesome  already.
If you dont like the fake look that cant be helped.
BIG implants come with a big implant look, naturally(what a pun), just like natural girls go sagging.
So go ahead and get your next phase on, not liking some kinds of breasts doesnt make you a lesser boobman.
In the end the love for boobs unites all and will bring world peace (well, hopefully). I thought we had enough  mudslinging here BuffaloJack?
Mudslinging takes away the pleasure from posting.

my 2 cents. take them for what they're worth.
and c'mon gimme a break, no one likes being called freaky.
if you dont like someone at least phrase it politely.


 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Raiden on January 22, 2005, 09:53:14 PM
 
Quote:

 i am not bashing Chelsea.  




instant replay...

 
Quote:

Im sorry but for me personally seeing Chelsea naked is really rather disgusting. She has just gotten too big and it wouldnt surprise me if she is close to having a major disaster with her implants and skin. I mean her skin looks FREAKY.
 




Kinda reminds me of Dom Irrera's "I don't mean that in a bad way"  Eraser Phrase.

"a low-life, mother fucking, shit eating, scumbag, rat bastard...but I don't mean that in a bad way!"

I understand it's your own taste, and I whole heartedly respect that......Buuuuuuuut wouldn't have been better just to say "She's not my thing" instead of going into detail?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on January 22, 2005, 10:02:17 PM
Quote:

 
Quote:

 i am not bashing Chelsea.  




instant replay...

 
Quote:

Im sorry but for me personally seeing Chelsea naked is really rather disgusting. She has just gotten too big and it wouldnt surprise me if she is close to having a major disaster with her implants and skin. I mean her skin looks FREAKY.
 




Kinda reminds me of Dom Irrera's "I don't mean that in a bad way"  Eraser Phrase.

"a low-life, mother fucking, shit eating, scumbag, rat bastard...but I don't mean that in a bad way!"

I understand it's your own taste, and I whole heartedly respect that......Buuuuuuuut wouldn't have been better just to say "She's not my thing" instead of going into detail?    




I hear you but this is my point.  Chelsea is one beautiful woman, who would be as an A cup.  When she was 4 or 5 cup sizes smaller she was heaven on earth.  Now.. Im really concerned for her health.  If more of her fans agreed with me.. OK maybe it is wishful thinking.. then maybe she would stop already with the freaky growth.

I guess the only way she can track how people feel about her is to monitor how many people are enrolling/renewing at her sites.  Also to monitor how many people are signing up for private shows.  A couple months back I would have considered an expensive private show.. but not now.  I was mainly wondering if any people agreed with my current opinion of her figure.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: F_Cup_Fitzgerald on January 22, 2005, 10:08:04 PM
I'm with you, Jack, I don't care for her appearance at all. I look at Chelsea and I always wonder how beautiful she'd be if she didn't have those implants. Besides, her nipples are crooked now, because the boob-jobs have stretched the skin unevenly.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Craig_Mercer on January 22, 2005, 10:41:36 PM
I've Seen the Eiffel Tower, the Leaning Tower Pisa, The Sun Setting over the Serengetti Plain, the Dancefloor at Pacha in Ibiza, the Great Wall of China, the Terracotta Army in Xian, the Hermitage and all its treasures, ditto for the Louvre. Michael Jackson and Prince live, and Tower 2 of the WTC collapse, all with my own eyes, and yet the most indelible image is still Chelsea passing through the lobby of Mandalay Bay last September.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 22, 2005, 10:45:32 PM
Breastmen.. that was a great cartoon Craig!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on January 22, 2005, 11:09:42 PM
Quote:

I've Seen the Eiffel Tower, the Leaning Tower Pisa, The Sun Setting over the Serengetti Plain, the Dancefloor at Pacha in Ibiza, the Great Wall of China, the Terracotta Army in Xian, the Hermitage and all its treasures, ditto for the Louvre. Michael Jackson and Prince live, and Tower 2 of the WTC collapse, all with my own eyes, and yet the most indelible image is still Chelsea passing through the lobby of Mandalay Bay last September.  




you know what, i would have agreed with you had I seen it because she would have been CLOTHED.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BarneyFife on January 22, 2005, 11:49:30 PM
Buffalojack,your entitled to your opinion of liking natural women,or perhaps just smaller women that is what makes the world of big boobs go round.Not every one is going to agree with you on what you like as a consumer.Some of us like all types of big boobed women natural and unnatural.It reminds me of the fads we all go through one month its vanilla another chocolate.It is a rarity to have big boob models that are beautiful thus chelsea has a combination beauty and big boobs that men desire.We may never see the likes of Chelsea again which I am glad she has continued to fulfill fans fantasies.I know you may worry that chelsea possibly could have a health risk but I am sure she would not hesitate to reduce if that became a problem.

I am not sure if you have seen chelsea in one of her shows but the shock factor is incredible there just isn't anything like it on earth.Naturals are nice but the unbelievable size chelsea has reached turns mature men into babbling 2 yr olds may make you think different if you saw a show by chelsea.The law of physics certainly is at work when seeing chelsea.How could a small woman carry basketballs around on her body they are at least that big.No natural woman could do this and being slim, chelsea is amazing.  
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on January 23, 2005, 01:03:59 AM
I myself prefer implants. That's just me. I don't care much for the big natural girls but I would certainly never go into detail about the things I did not like about them. And I would certainly never use an adjective like "disgusting". Why risk hurting someone else's feelings, just to express my own humble opinion? (Maybe Chelsea reads this board. Maybe not. But I know that some of her close friends do.)

When it comes to Chelsea's health, she always seems fighting fit and full of energy when I see her. She is an articulate and intelligent young lady and I am sure she keeps a close eye on her well-being.

When Chelsea finally retires (let's hope that's not any time soon), there will be no one to pass the torch to. It is unlikely that anyone approaching her combination of size and beauty will ever come this way again. In the future big boob fans will wax lyrical about how they wished they had had a chance to meet her. I personaly count myself fortunate to have known her, not just for her incredible physique and beauty, but for her kindness and sweetness.

Pixeltiger

PS. I should also mention Maxi Mounds and Mel Charm who also are showcases of huge boobs and true class. And Crystal Gunns who is just a fantastic all round person. And... well I could go on all night....  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on January 23, 2005, 03:49:51 AM
Well, everybody can have their own opinion about Chelsea. I personally can not get enough of her.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MermetTheHermit on January 23, 2005, 04:36:02 AM
You know, I can understand the issue with the freakishness.  I think, at this point, you have to like at least a little bit of freakishness in a woman's looks to find Chelsea alluring.  And, as it happens, I do like her kind of freakishness; it's a super-sexy kind of freakishness, we Chelsea hounds seem to agree.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch22 on January 23, 2005, 05:17:22 AM
SteveIce can speak for me when it comes to CC.

BTW, thanks for that pic. Never saw it before.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Connoisseur on January 23, 2005, 06:40:45 AM
I agree that she is sexier clothed.  Unfortunately, she is rather conservative in her dress.  I don't believe, for example, that I've ever seen her in a pair of low-rise jeans.  Nor have I seen her in a short-skirted business suit and heels.  She'd look great in both outfits.

All in all I think that she's a national treasure, who I greatly appreciate.  I wouldn't mind at all if her breasts doubled in size.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: notty on January 23, 2005, 08:47:59 AM
breasts that resemble skin balloons aren't pleasing to me, but I gotta admire her pioneering spirit  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on January 23, 2005, 12:35:08 PM
Quote:

I guess the only way she can track how people feel about her is to monitor how many people are enrolling/renewing at her sites. Also to monitor how many people are signing up for private shows




There's probably another aspect to this which you have not considered.  Chelsea is obviously the reigning queen of huge boobdom, and will remain so as long as her breasts remain the largest in the world (proportionally speaking).  We have also discussed many times that there is a significant segment of huge boob fans on limited budgets who prioritize their spending on huge boob girls - with the girl having the largest breasts being the major financial beneficiary of those limited budgets.  There is also a significant segment of huge boob 'live 1 on 1  entertainment' fans who are willing to spend $750 an hour for an up-close encounter with Chelsea's boobs, versus spending a similar amount of money for a more extensive up-close encounter with another huge (but not as huge) boobs girl.

Now imagine what would result if, for example, Chelsea were to choose to reduce her breast size significantly.  All of a sudden her breasts could be in the same size range as (to pick a couple of names at random) say Minka or Liz Starr.  Chelsea would immediately have a marketing problem selling $750 'private sessions' offering close encounters with her boobs, competing with other girls willing to provide full escort services with similar sized boobs.

On the 'glamour' side, Chelsea choosing to reduce her breast size significantly, in conjuntion with a girl like PBD for example continuing to INCREASE her own breast size, might put the huge boobs 'glamour' segment up for grabs.

And of course if Chelsea were to reduce her breast size, the title of 'Queen of huge boobs' would probably fall by default to Maxi, with that segment of prioritized huge boob fan spending reserved for the absolutely biggest boobs being redirected accordingly.

Thus, sadly, in many ways Chelsea is 'trapped' into keeping her absolutely huge boobs until she retires, or would be forced to re-evaluate her business model with smaller breasts (i.e. probably providing full escort services as other girls in a similar breast size range do), in order to remain highly profitable in today's huge boobs business.  

"There can be only ONE"
     
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: mcgarp on January 23, 2005, 02:15:53 PM
Sorry to change the subject but as long as we're talking about chelsea, I just found out she is from LeSeur Minnesota.  That is only about 35 miles from me.  How strange.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 23, 2005, 02:38:10 PM
so be proud to live 35 miles next to world biggest boobs LOL! (just kidding you)
It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure anyone's postal code, mcgarp. I have at least 3 acquaintances that live 40 Kilometres from Penelope in Germany

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on January 23, 2005, 04:29:04 PM
Well.. I do feel honored that the great Melonie Charm took the time to donate to my thread.  I certainly hear where you are coming from.  

I am just concerned for her well being.  Do you think she looks well in the chest up close and naked Melonie?  Is she continuing to grow to please us, thinking we want her to explode?  Naturally I know she isn't.  I have read her posts on her boards and she is obviously a smart cookie and seemingly a smart business woman.  I just hope she has a smart doctor as well!   And I hope she isn't sacrificing her own personal well being for the sake of greed.  Let's be obvious here and call it like it is.  Chelsea's career goal is to collect enough money and retire before her looks give out or we are no longer interested.  An honourable goal, I guess, but not one that I think she should consider at the expense of her health.   I mean can her back really be handling the weight of 60 pound tits combined as well as she says it is?    

Another point is she could still be the biggest in the world and drop to maybe her 2003 size.  She is so much bigger than Maxi now, I'd say 5 cup sizes??? that she could reduce her puppies considerably and still be the queen of the big boob circuit.  Who is even close to catching her at his stage??   Enough is enough don't you think?

My only real point left is my original one.  She just doesn't look well!  I'm concerned we will read about her in the local press one day with the headline "Big Boob star explodes on stage".  And we should all feel somewhat guilty if something does really happen to her.  

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 23, 2005, 04:43:42 PM
Do you think her growth is voluntary?  It is due to the type of implants she has.  Can we assume that she is intelligent enough to take care of her own well-being, even if buffalojack doesn't think so?  I think this was just your latest cut down Chelsea thread in the guise of concern for her health. It never gets old, really.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Bambi_Blaze on January 23, 2005, 05:02:11 PM
I would think that Chelsea's well-being would be her first priority....let's face it.....it is  her body and the only one she'll ever have, so naturally, the health of her boobs and their continuous growth is more important to her than anyone else.

I imagine too that she keeps in close contact with her doctor, and neither of them would allow her to be in physical jeopardy.      
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on January 23, 2005, 06:18:13 PM
Quote:

I would think that Chelsea's well-being would be her first priority....let's face it.....it is  her body and the only one she'll ever have, so naturally, the health of her boobs and their continuous growth is more important to her than anyone else.

I imagine too that she keeps in close contact with her doctor, and neither of them would allow her to be in physical jeopardy.      




I agree Bams, it's not like:

Chelsea: "Give it to me straight doc, I can take it."

Doctor: "Chelsea, I'm afraid that if your breasts grow another two inches, your spine will snap."

Chelsea: *fighting to stand up straight* "But...they....m-must......keep........growing"

She knows what her current back, skin and boob situation is. Eat Quizno's.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 23, 2005, 06:37:01 PM
I think you both are right. Now maybe Buffalojack can stop worrying himself sick over the lady he no longer finds attractive.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on January 23, 2005, 06:40:59 PM
I think this was just your latest cut down Chelsea thread in the guise of concern for her health. It never gets old, really.
 




Funny how you pick and choose only what you perceive as negative in my posts,  Did you happen to see how beautiful I said she is, or would be as an A cup?  Is this cutting the person down?  Learn to read.. it's a good thing.  Thanks for telling me it never gets old as well.  Perhaps you should learn how to proof your posts.
 
As far as what Bambi says... sure i can imagine she is in close contact with her doctor.  It doesn't discount though the horror stories of what has happened to some implanted girls over the years.  I just hope she knows what she is doing.  The way her skin looks, and the current shape of her breasts,  doesn't convince me that she does.  It makes me truly wonder if greed and the almighty dollar has taken over.    
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 23, 2005, 07:02:41 PM
I did notice how you wrapped your insults in what you thought was a clever disguise. Maybe greed will take over. How again does that affect you?  Why not let the people that it affects most, (Chelsea herself) worry about the choices she makes in her life? You spend a lot of energy focusing on a woman that you no longer enjoy her boobs.  Hopefully she will be able to make it without your support.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 23, 2005, 07:34:56 PM
yup. She knows best. So cut the cr*p for the sake of boobs.
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: melonie_charm on January 23, 2005, 08:02:13 PM
Quote:

Do you think her growth is voluntary? It is due to the type of implants she has




Well, all girls with string implants have the option of having our doctor using a syringe to 'drain' serous fluid from our breasts to stop further growth (temporarily at least).  Chelsea used to do this, and apparently stopped, allowing her breast growth to resume.  For this reason I can't believe that Chelsea has any impending issues with her breasts.  As to exactly how much business incentive she might have in allowing her breasts to grow even bigger ... well I would imagine that it DOES serve as a significant incentive for would-be repeat website members, repeat "private session" customers etc. but that's just my imagination.

Also, even though Chelsea's breasts are unarguably huge, there's no way that they could weigh 60 pounds.  7500cc * 2 * 2.2 lbs/1000cc = about 31 pounds - which is a tremendous cantilevered load on her spinal discs and back  considering the center of gravity of her breasts is at least 18 inches forward of her spine.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on January 23, 2005, 08:05:54 PM
Melonie:

According to her own posts at her site, she says they weigh approx 30 pounds each.  This is not from one of her fans, it is from Chelsea herself.  Of course she also says she is like a 153zz cup or something lol so... I guess it's all marketing.

Let me ask you this though Melonie.  Do you think her skin looks healthy?  Her boobs just don't look healthy to me anymore.

As far as GGK, aka, ASS, I wish you would take your own selfish interests in having Chelsea be as big as a house and put them aside. I was a hardcore CC fan and am only expressing my concerns about what I see in photos.   Let's face reality..if she does have a major problem down the road it really will have NO IMPACT on my life.  I am not the only one who is no longer attracted to her based on the posts I have read here.. and I have the right to express my opinion as such.  If you don't like my opinion, too bad.  

Jack  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tiggo on January 23, 2005, 08:18:15 PM
Just my $.02

Chelsea is still very attractive IMHO.  Her breasts are indeed the biggest in the world (not counting BBW's).

The visual effect of seeing her small, fairly slim body combined with those bigger-than-watermelons sized tits is indescribable.  Even more so when she is clothed, I might add.

I'm going to paint the world NICE and assume that original poster BJack just wanted input, not to insult.  And that any seemingly insulting parts of his opinion were in fact subconscious attempts to make sure that at the very least he wouldn't be IGNORED (which, isn't it true after all is the WORST response on a message board such as this).

And I'm going to paint Ms. Melonie NICE and say that her ubiquitous and un-ending interest in Chelsea's breasts is from a admirers' perspective.

Also, I'd like to say that boobs really really really aren't everything.  

IMHO, Chelsea has a very sweet, kind, approachable, and sensual persona that I have witnessed in person twice.  

Furthermore IMHO, there are many BB models/dancers, who EVEN IF they were "the biggest", I would NOT care to see or have a private dance with.

I agree there can be "only ONE", but life is NOT a zero-sum game.

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on January 23, 2005, 08:37:05 PM
Hey Tiggo:

Why do you think I mentioned Chelsea's name in the subject matter of the post??.  One thing you can guarantee is people come running when they see her name anywhere on this board.   I mean no ill will towards her.  I just wish she was the way she was in 2003.  

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Pixeltiger on January 23, 2005, 08:49:43 PM
Another erudite post from the lovely Melonie, our resident sage. (With huge boobs)

I said this in my previous post but it didn't seem to get through: Chelsea looks fine. Healthy and lively. If she felt her health was in any way at risk, I am sure she would action accordingly.

Pixeltiger
   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 23, 2005, 09:07:37 PM
The inimitable Melonie Charm wrote the somewhat startling...
Quote:

Also, even though Chelsea's breasts are unarguably huge, there's no way that they could weigh 60 pounds. 7500cc * 2 * 2.2 lbs/1000cc = about 31 pounds - which is a tremendous cantilevered load on her spinal discs and back considering the center of gravity of her breasts is at least 18 inches forward of her spine.


And our friend Tiggo weighed in with...
Quote:

Just my $.02

Chelsea is still very attractive IMHO.  Her breasts are indeed the biggest in the world (not counting BBW's)




Now you see, this is one of the things I get flamed for bringing up!  And I am sick and tired of being flamed for being the voice of REASON on it.

I have brought up points about SERIOUSLY obese folks doing tremendous damage to their health by being so obese and that it is not a question of the individual but the condition that MUST get some serious attention.

If Chelsea has a problem with 31 pounds of canitlevered weight in front of her damaging her spine, just imagine the damage being done by a 100 pound gut and 50 pounds of extra chest fat ripping and tearing at the discs and vertebrae in a BBW (critically obese woman).

We are going to pay the piper eventually for all this physical maltreatment!


 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 23, 2005, 09:20:52 PM
BuffaloJack or BullSh#$ as the case may be, I don't care how big Chelsea gets. I think your goal of starting a little pep rally to hear from all the people who want to say they are no longer attracted to her is not only silly, but hides your true intentions of just insulting her.  Your reputation of bashing her preceeds this little exercise in negativity. You pretend to care a lot about her health, but don't apparently care one thing about her feelings.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tiggo on January 23, 2005, 09:22:13 PM
i don't think you would've gotten "flamed" for saying that.

also, no, Whink, no no no!   I don't know where you live, but here in the good ole U.S. of A. we have a thing called "personal responsibility".

Extremely obese people KNOW that they're unhealthy.

I guess you could argue that "we" as taxpayers pay for them via taxes and such, but not as much as we would if we had a national healthcare system.

If, you Whink are concerned about someone you know and/or love being obese, tell them you care and help them lose weight IF THEY WANT TO.

If they DON'T, well, just leave it alone.  Nobody wants to be preached at or about.

Remember:  personal responsibility.

To any and all other readers of this thread, don't let whink's tangent keep you from commenting on the issue at hand.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BuffaloJack on January 23, 2005, 09:31:39 PM
Tiggo:

Obese people (on average) cost more to take care of healthcare wise than fit in shape people.  It is proven.  Our healthcare system is already extremely expensive to begin with.  In my opinion if they can tax smokers because of what they are doing to our healthcare costs, they should be able to find a way to tax the fatties lol.  

Personal responsibilty stops when you have to rely on the healthcare system to correct the heart disease, or other scary disease that you brought onto yourself for being a fat ass. It drives up all of our premiums to the point where many businesses can't afford healthcare for their workers anymore.
 
Let's face it.. we are one fat country.  At 6ft 210 I actually am also slightly overweight but I am almost considered svelte nowadays lol.
   

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 23, 2005, 09:31:47 PM
Tig, my friend...

Again nothing about any particular person.  But IF  I had a friend who wanted to do something about his/her weight and I could help, I would.  Just like I did something about my own.

Did you get that last bit?  

Just like I did something about my own

No, as for being flamed?  Oh hell yeah.  

And as for us all paying the price?  Count on it, dude.  Right in the good old US of A.  (I'm, currently working and living outside the USA but I'll move back to Boston someday...)

Ever heard of Medicare and Medicaid?  With an aging population and an increasingly militant and influential AARP, there will be a national health care system for all over 65 and that includes all who will eventually be over 65 and suffer the consequences from a lifetime of obesity.

It is only a matter of time.  That is all.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: apehanger on January 23, 2005, 09:33:26 PM
I love Chelsea's breasts and respect her pioneering efforts. Their shape, however, is become disfigured. It would be cool if she could find new implants that would retain or increase her size and restore a more natural shape.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on January 23, 2005, 09:39:13 PM
Quote:

I love Chelsea's breasts and respect her pioneering efforts. Their shape, however, is become disfigured. It would be cool if she could find new implants that would retain or increase her size and restore a more natural shape.  




She could have by applying olive oil or some other natural lubricant to her skin during the main growth periods.  This is particularly true during pregnancy, as most women who know the "old world" methods can attest to.  To keep breasts in their natural proportions and eliminate stetch marks.

Works great for your arms when you're working out too!!

And BTW both my (then) wife and  I told Chelsea all about the Olive Oil method back in Feb 2000.  We got "rolling eyes".

FACT:She is pretty weirdly shaped now.  And

FACT 2: She is so big that the rest of her figure is suffering due to the fact that she has reduced mobility to keep everything else in shape.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 23, 2005, 10:07:10 PM
well, lets derail this Chelsea criticizing thread now.
If you dont like something or someone, just leave the situation alone.Some things are justifiable with skewed reasons but certainly unasked for.A little respect never hurt.

Mutual respect between people is what makes your country great! Give that a minute of thought.

And...olive oil actually is pretty good for additional haircare, too!

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on January 23, 2005, 10:53:13 PM
WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 23, 2005, 11:27:13 PM
well hooray GoCubsGo!. her last new DVD was sooooo good in that scene   but I dont have to tell that to the Chelsea fans here, of course.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Elliot James on January 23, 2005, 11:28:54 PM
I have been literally begging CC for several years to reshoot for SCORE. Pixeltiger's comments reflect my own thoughts. So that's my feelings about her.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BarneyFife on January 23, 2005, 11:48:14 PM
It is amazing the second a new chelsea thread starts the amount of attention it gets.I am sure chelsea knows you can't please 100% of the people all the time.What is the one thing an entertainer is on the out to be forgotten is people quit talking about you.In the entertainment industry some stars want bad or good press at least people are talking about them.Back to my main point if 99% are pleased then you have done a good job of pleasing the fans.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ggk on January 23, 2005, 11:52:45 PM
Doesn't look like the Big Boob experts share buffalo's opinion.  How many other model's with "unattractive" boobs is Score begging to shoot with them?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 23, 2005, 11:53:48 PM
What did you expect her name draws big boobfans liek honey draws flies.
The % line is a line phrased by herself, isnt it? ;-)

Mister James: Well please beg more and wave those dollars!
Never enough of Miss Charms, as the above positive parts of this thread reflect.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: F_Cup_Fitzgerald on January 24, 2005, 05:06:51 AM
How big was Chelsea before she had ANY implants?  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: solvegas on January 24, 2005, 05:33:33 AM
She said a D cup . She's probably out of the alphabet now . God , I love it !!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on January 24, 2005, 06:32:09 AM
Quote:

I guess I am going through a faze but I am finding that I am starting to get disgusted by the mega implanted girls who look odd.  I was a member at chelseacharms.com and I have to say that(unless the pic was clothed) that she just doesn't do it for me anymore.  I am finding more and more that the naturals are the ones turning my head lately. (or at least the ones who appear natural)   Nadine, milena Ewa,Miriam and most recently someone posted about subbie.  These are the ones who get my heart thumpuing lately.    Im sorry but for me personally seeing Chelsea naked is really rather disgusting.  She has just gotten too big and it wouldnt surprise me if she is close to having a major disaster with her implants and skin.  I mean her skin looks FREAKY.  

i am not bashing Chelsea.  Obviously she has a crowd she caters to.  Im just wondering if I am the only one who used to be a fan and isn't anymore.  

Jack
   




i can say this much, i agree but, i don't think it's disgusting, i simply now find it not tasteful anymore like i used too. but those who still like her more power to you all. -even though, i sometimes look her up- that's just out of sheer bordom
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrEff on January 24, 2005, 02:11:55 PM
 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: LegendKiller on January 26, 2005, 03:56:54 AM
This is one of my fave's of Chelsea's. Can anyone estimate how big she is in this pic? Just wondering...  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: likwidflame on January 26, 2005, 06:57:24 AM
I believe it's somewhere between 'How the fuck' and 'God made a boob so big even he couldn't cup it'.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: snoopyh42 on January 26, 2005, 08:24:41 AM
God had nothing to do with those boobs.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 26, 2005, 10:17:01 AM
well...lets say she's just a little smaller then now
the carwash is one of her earliest boosmquests.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SwitcherX on January 26, 2005, 11:45:34 AM
the pic reminds me of Isabelle Lanthier.  She was a T cup do I'd guess Chelsea is a T too, give or take a cup.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrEff on January 26, 2005, 01:51:47 PM
I'd say a "good god" cup

-MrEff-
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Davastav on January 26, 2005, 03:05:10 PM
Chelseas acutal measurements have always been a secret. I  once wrote to her on her forum on her website and she wouldn't comment on either her band size or her full bust measurement - she said that she always growing. But she is rather a diminuitive girl with a small back so her band size is probably a 32-34??? but her full bust measurement is at least 60"+. So what cup size would she be with an est 30" difference between her bust/frame???

Maxi once went on the record and said she was measured 60" so I use that as a barometer.  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MasterX0 on January 26, 2005, 06:13:10 PM
Umm...freakin huge, holy boobs, Super tits?
Master"more likly out of the alphabet"X0
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 27, 2005, 12:36:16 AM
Why TF won't Chelsea give her current size out? This is getting silly. I would rather she doesn't put any measurements up on her site than all of that stupid 135XXX crap.

I'm just sayin'...

Edited to add: snoopy42h I love your avatar! Any chance of getting a bigger version of it?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: sheber on January 27, 2005, 12:43:32 AM
Ask CarlTL, he made the avatar. Oh wait, that was a morph in the Buffy thread first. I'd check there.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Fong on January 27, 2005, 01:42:42 AM
I'd guess about a Stanley cup  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on January 27, 2005, 02:28:05 AM
Some one ask for me?

   
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrEff on January 27, 2005, 05:00:37 AM
Damn thats a nice morph Carl..... kudos to you!!!

-MrEff-
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch22 on January 27, 2005, 07:02:25 AM
Every adult entertainer with a pay site makes some good decisions and a few bad ones.

I've always thought Chelsea not publishing her statistics on a regular basis was a business mistake. Perhaps it's better for her "peace of mind". In that case - business be damned.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 27, 2005, 10:43:49 AM
of course.. all of us fans wondering about just her boob size must be one of the most  returning (and maybe boring for any model) questions in her career?

I always thought REALLY HUGE with capital letters was a good way to describe the lady's wonderful chest.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 31, 2005, 08:19:13 PM
Quote:

I have been literally begging CC for several years to reshoot for SCORE. Pixeltiger's comments reflect my own thoughts. So that's my feelings about her.  


Interesting! Why in the world would Chelsea be playing hard to get with SCORE, of all people? I wonder...

P.S.: Elliot, if you do get Chelsea to agree to a photoshoot, for the love of Pete, get her to do a measuring session! An accurate one, mind you, no fake tape measures or stuff like that! Please!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on January 31, 2005, 10:43:57 PM
and better get a looooong measure  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on February 28, 2005, 05:05:55 PM
http://www.chelseacharms.com/expo/expodvd.html

what a neat surprise on her part!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: GoCubsGo on February 28, 2005, 05:16:18 PM
 
Quote:

Chelsea As You've Never Seen Her Before




Hardocore ?    

 
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on February 28, 2005, 06:01:31 PM
well I cant tell. but my best bet is ....she brought a date?/boyfriend?/cute fan? there, didnt she...
 

two thumbs up for Chelsea making such a big surprise for the fans!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: geffo1 on February 28, 2005, 07:53:04 PM
It does look very promising on the preview..Need to know soon as!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: DukeofWindsor on February 28, 2005, 08:56:59 PM
Eagerly awaiting any news...vid looks awesome!  Glad to see some Crystal Gunns in there too..teamed with Chelsea, they both ROCK!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Jaedakisz on February 28, 2005, 10:51:19 PM
WOW this looks awesome
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MrEff on February 28, 2005, 11:41:45 PM
I hope that isn't a boyfriend... I'll be so heartbroken....

-MrEff-
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: stream on March 01, 2005, 04:03:42 AM
Quote:





BEST NEWS EVER!!!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Champy on March 01, 2005, 04:08:30 AM
Looks like a winner......thanks for the heads up.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Bababooey86 on March 01, 2005, 04:10:17 AM
Even if it isn't hardcore, I'll get this.  I've been pretty bored with her stuff lately so even if it's just the dude playing with her beauties I'll definately drop $45 on it.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on March 01, 2005, 05:01:17 AM
i would prefer to see her in hardcore stuff.... but interesting dvd none the less
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: H_man on March 01, 2005, 06:34:30 AM
I hate this guy already.   But maybe it's just me.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: mcgarp on March 01, 2005, 10:08:12 AM
maybe it's just me, but Chelsea looks quite a bit bigger than Maxi.  Usually they look close in size even though CC is bigger proportionaly.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on March 01, 2005, 12:38:50 PM
Chelsea outgrew Maxi two years ago and SHE JUST KEPT ON GROWING!!

I'm amazed she can get a guy close enough to her for actual kissing without their both their necks in the straing, the reach to get past her watermelon sized breasts!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ninjrk on March 01, 2005, 01:28:15 PM
I'd think at best you'll get some hard R style boobplay and simusex.  Since hardcore is the old ace in the hole when the popularity wanes one would think that would be reserved a bit.  She's going to sell a buttload of DVD's anyway, so why go that far.  Plus, since she doesn't appear to allow much more than boob play when she sessions, it's not a natural outgrowth of something that she's already doing.

It'd be cool if she did but I'd be awfully suprised.

Matt
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 01, 2005, 01:30:54 PM
ummm. I dont know if you have been reading BEA closely..but Chelsea offers "more" if mood and money are right....and especially when it's a friend of hers it would be something different anyway
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on March 01, 2005, 07:59:29 PM
Well I will find out. I put in my order and tell when I'm done
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Whink on March 01, 2005, 08:46:51 PM
We can always count on our friendly neighborhood Boob Brother!

CHEERS!!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: cefiro on March 02, 2005, 03:55:48 AM
If anyone buys it, post up what she does! Even if it isnt hardcore, id like to see her do something with a guy.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ninjrk on March 02, 2005, 06:27:49 PM
Quote:

ummm. I dont know if you have been reading BEA closely..but Chelsea offers "more" if mood and money are right....and especially when it's a friend of hers it would be something different anyway  




Sure, but it's not part of the standard package, she does it when she wants to, kind of a benny.  To me, that's a bit different than her turning on the acting and moaning away while she contemplates what color to paint the dining room for every guy with $1000.

Not saying that she won't, just that it doesn't seem to be in line with her persona to date, at least to me.  Somewhat irrelevant; she has a fantastic bust and is generally cuter than hell.  I'm sure it will be a good DVD.

Matt
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 02, 2005, 10:36:36 PM
her best merchandised movie. definitely
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 04, 2005, 01:51:26 PM
bump for fantastic boobs
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: tonedef on March 10, 2005, 10:04:55 PM
Wa wa wa.... Anyway, lotta big boobs, but that whole "chelsea like you've never seen her before!" is basically just some guy kissing her boobs. So yeah, chelsea tits are big, but the video is nothing special, kinda a dissapointment actually.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 10, 2005, 10:43:27 PM
kissing is bettter than nothing.
and we didnt see that before  .

and the disc should be bought for expo-documentary values anyway  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: non on March 10, 2005, 10:49:57 PM
I'd like to see a video of her seeing the male member but I digress.....
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Bababooey86 on March 11, 2005, 12:18:56 AM
That's good enough for me!  Where's my credit card?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: zappfra on March 11, 2005, 12:59:56 AM
I think every Chelse video I have purchased has been slightly disappointing, but for some reason I keep buying them.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Champy on March 11, 2005, 01:42:36 PM
I wonder if Chelsea made that guy pay 800 dollars an hour?

I went ahead and bought the video.  It was pretty much what I expected.  I was not disappointed at all.  Chelsea looked great in the two outfits she wore at the Expo, and there were tons of other hot babes around.  They were cutting up and having a good time.  They had one segment with a bikini contest, which was very good (Chelsea wasn't involved in it). The camera work was very good, lots of good angles of thoses monterous boobs.  The part with the guy at the end was very short, only about 5 or 10 minutes.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Rad on March 11, 2005, 03:27:15 PM
What blew my mind was how HUGE Minka is. She looks almost as big as Chelsea, but with that tiny waist and body. I met her years ago on a boob cruise and she wasn't nearly as big as she is now.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: malquerido on March 11, 2005, 03:49:34 PM
just i can say
i envy that guy
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on March 11, 2005, 05:43:23 PM
Quote:


I went ahead and bought the video.  It was pretty much what I expected.  I was not disappointed at all.  Chelsea looked great in the two outfits she wore at the Expo, and there were tons of other hot babes around.  They were cutting up and having a good time.  They had one segment with a bikini contest, which was very good (Chelsea wasn't involved in it). The camera work was very good, lots of good angles of thoses monterous boobs.  The part with the guy at the end was very short, only about 5 or 10 minutes.




So can you tell us how long the video is in total? And CC is visible how much time (rough estimation)? Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Champy on March 11, 2005, 07:31:47 PM
The video is listed as 60 minutes.  Chelsea is in most every scene, except for the bikini contest, which lasted about 10 minutes.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 11, 2005, 10:44:49 PM
Her webmaster comes from the commercial world...so he is a true genius with angles! gotta love that!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ForzaItalia on March 12, 2005, 10:03:36 AM
Can't anyone post some images from it? Or link to a place where they sell it, maybe there's some pictures there.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: boobifanX on March 12, 2005, 02:58:46 PM
Quote:

kissing is bettter than nothing.
 




Kissing IS nothing .

I think her videos are not very sexy and much too tame.
I think her vids please all die-hard Chelsea-fans and are not really hot for most other boobfans.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 12, 2005, 07:41:57 PM
well the die hards is where the cash is ;-)
isnt it?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: cefiro on March 14, 2005, 05:39:17 PM
 
Quote:

 The part with the guy at the end was very short, only about 5 or 10 minutes.
 




What does she do with the guy? Just kiss, or does he at least play with her boobs?

Thanks
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 22, 2005, 06:21:07 PM
kissing boobplay and the slap me silly game!
recommended for chelsea fans!

No one expected anything else.
And the documentary part is hot too. There even is a sexy part about the bikini contest.

to summarize: a fantastic release if you like huge implanted tits at expositions.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crazyjose on March 22, 2005, 06:32:14 PM
I still haven't got mine yet but looking forward to seeing the Fan Fair section.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 22, 2005, 06:37:20 PM
It's her best merchandise CJ. Well worth the wait!
You'll see what I mean...
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Champy on March 23, 2005, 03:00:12 PM
After a second viewing of the DVD, I distincly heard the words "BE ARCHIVE" uttered by a gentleman chatting with Chelsea.  Anybody want to fess up?  It would be cool to put a face and name together.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: USER_8776_NOT_FOUND on March 31, 2005, 08:19:36 PM
chelsea's boobs grew  alot the last 5 years and i was wondering if she would be able to stand up streight in an other 5 years.
She about 9000cc now and i would guess  she will be about 17000cc by that time.

Pretty terrifying if you imagine her at that size



-----------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: BazBear on March 31, 2005, 08:25:00 PM
She has to have them drained every so often. If she didn't, I suspect she'd already be over 17,000 CCs.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on March 31, 2005, 08:34:31 PM
draining is the key. she knows whats healthy.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on March 31, 2005, 08:42:15 PM
*grabs newspaper* "Terrorizing?! <_< >_> Wait till she gets a load of ZZZ's." She'll have wonderful toys then.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RB on March 31, 2005, 11:03:18 PM
Personally, I'd like to see it get that far.

I'm a big fan of Chelsea's - but I'd love to see it get totally out of control (health permitting).

Ashley Bond in the UK set out with the intention of continuing to have fliud added to her implants (via a little valve on the side of each breast), until it either became to painful to continue, or the doctor recommended not going any further - but she's since given up.

I'd personally like to have seen her go to record-breaking sizes.

I know a guy who met Chelsea, and he said her tits were has hard as Samsonite leather suitcases - but each one was like the size of a beachball.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tsunami2k on April 01, 2005, 12:09:13 AM
i go with what hentai said... but, i never really cared much for her anyways... so i don't pay attention to things like this
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: USER_2381_NOT_FOUND on April 01, 2005, 03:53:47 AM
Jack Nicholson, baby... nice reference
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Squirrelgirl on April 01, 2005, 10:06:54 AM
Quote:

I know a guy who met Chelsea, and he said her tits were has hard as Samsonite leather suitcases - but each one was like the size of a beachball.




I couldn't imagine having hard boobs. That doesn't sound any fun at all.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Litch on April 01, 2005, 04:57:56 PM
Quote:

Quote:

I know a guy who met Chelsea, and he said her tits were has hard as Samsonite leather suitcases - but each one was like the size of a beachball.




I couldn't imagine having hard boobs. That doesn't sound any fun at all.




I concur... but I'm going to take a moment to think of what breasts that size would look like if she didn't drain...

Of course I'm a terrible person who's going to hell.

My best guess is in 5 years she'd be well advised to get a serious reduction, for her own sake (and the sake of her spine).
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on April 01, 2005, 05:47:01 PM
Quote:

I know a guy who met Chelsea, and he said her tits were has hard as Samsonite leather suitcases - but each one was like the size of a beachball.



I... like... the way... it sounds. Guess me crazy.  

see yaa... =)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: SteveIce on April 03, 2005, 07:34:48 AM
I'm not sure if hard is the best way to describe them. Very Heavy would be better. When you go up to the stage to give her a dollar, and she sticks your head between them, and knocks you around, they feel very heavy, and AWESOME.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Growth on April 04, 2005, 06:19:53 AM
Hey SteveIce, who´s that other woman in the picture you attached?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: vader7476 on April 04, 2005, 06:21:48 AM
It looks like Crystal Gunns to me.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Crunk on April 04, 2005, 08:13:30 AM
If I were to ever meet her in person and was gievn a chance to feel her up, id just sit there poking at her boobs for an hour going "oooooooooooooooo".
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on April 04, 2005, 04:02:49 PM
I have a bit of a hard time understanding why her boobs are not more squishy since they are apparently full of mostly fluid.  You would think that they would be very malleable and soft like a balloon full of water.  Still awesome to behold!!  
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ForzaItalia on April 13, 2005, 09:42:28 PM
Yeah, topic.. I'm a member @ her site but I haven't found one single picture where she's totally naked.

Have you?!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Demolition_Man on April 13, 2005, 10:31:54 PM
You're much more likely to find a fan photo where she is naked.  This is the closest to naked I could find.  Yes, she IS wearing that sparkly band around her hips but my God, if that isn't naked enough for you........ She also ....erm.... "revealed" herself in some of her earlier sets, but you are going to have to search for those.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ForzaItalia on April 13, 2005, 10:37:16 PM
Great pic, thanks!

You mean the older sets at her site? I'll have a look!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ac man on April 13, 2005, 10:46:16 PM
she was naked in the video kayla kleevage sells of her, back in her beginning days.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Demolition_Man on April 13, 2005, 10:58:39 PM
 
Quote:

 You mean the older sets at her site? I'll have a look!



I don't know whether or not those were sets from her site, and the pic I gave you also wasn't on her sight.  I'm not even a member of her site.  I got that pic and found the older sets at yahoo groups.  I don't think I can link to them here because they contain some pics that are illegal here so linking is a no-no.  These groups are not too hard to find though if you're search saavy and like to follow links.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: JJTHEDJ on April 13, 2005, 11:01:11 PM
Quote:

she was naked in the video kayla kleevage sells of her, back in her beginning days.



Hey! I happen to have that video for sale in Classifieds!

Introducing Chelsea Charms  
Here is your very first look at newcomer Chelsea Charms! Young, beautiful, a pretty smile and one hell of a giant set of tits! Make Chelsea the girl of the New Millennium! I’m sure you will enjoy getting to know Chelsea and watching as she pleasures herself into ecstasy! I myself was very stimulated doing the post-production work on this video. Introducing Chelsea Charms is a Kleevco Video exclusive.

It retails for $29.95 new with picture case from Kayla's site. The Ebayer I bought it from took the trouble to get it autographed at a public appearance. I don't have the time nor inclination to fake a CC autograph and he was a reputable boob-collector with lots of professionally signed stuff. I assume it's legit. If it's not, it's still the original tape from Kleevco featuring Chelsea AND KAYLA in sweet posing and stimulating detail. Yours if you act now. What's it worth to you folks? Anyone?
PM me or just hit reply. Thanks, JJ.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: ForzaItalia on April 14, 2005, 12:02:00 AM
Thanks for the tip! I "Googled" a while and found a group, with AWESOME pictures. Got everything I wanted now Thanks ^^
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Catch22 on April 14, 2005, 12:49:19 AM
The greatest number of nude pics in a single set are from her camping vacation 2 or 3 summers ago. I believe she was in Colorado, but don't bank on that.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RoosterBoy on April 14, 2005, 05:27:21 AM
I have a old score magazine with Chelsea Charms in it where she is completly nude, before she went 'super size' if you're intreasted I'll dig it out and look up the issue number.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 14, 2005, 09:02:26 AM
why she doesnt go nude online is a mystery.?

if you want nude..hmm... go through her yahoo fan club...

and buy her older merchandise. like fanfair 01
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 14, 2005, 09:09:56 AM
Quote:

Quote:

she was naked in the video kayla kleevage sells of her, back in her beginning days.



Hey! I happen to have that video for sale in Classifieds!

Introducing Chelsea Charms  
Here is your very first look at newcomer Chelsea Charms! Young, beautiful, a pretty smile and one hell of a giant set of tits! Make Chelsea the girl of the New Millennium! I’m sure you will enjoy getting to know Chelsea and watching as she pleasures herself into ecstasy! I myself was very stimulated doing the post-production work on this video. Introducing Chelsea Charms is a Kleevco Video exclusive.

It retails for $29.95 new with picture case from Kayla's site. The Ebayer I bought it from took the trouble to get it autographed at a public appearance. I don't have the time nor inclination to fake a CC autograph and he was a reputable boob-collector with lots of professionally signed stuff. I assume it's legit. If it's not, it's still the original tape from Kleevco featuring Chelsea AND KAYLA in sweet posing and stimulating detail. Yours if you act now. What's it worth to you folks? Anyone?
PM me or just hit reply. Thanks, JJ.




that video has a chelsea interview and solo..but kayla???
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 14, 2005, 10:37:43 AM
Quote:

The greatest number of nude pics in a single set are from her camping vacation 2 or 3 summers ago. I believe she was in Colorado, but don't bank on that.



wasnt there some pics posted in error?. i think someone at that yahoo club showed them to me once
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RoosterBoy on April 14, 2005, 09:08:24 PM
It was score buxotica #59 that I mentioned in my previous post. It also has a lot of others in it like Maxi Mounds, Busty Dusty and Minka. Chelsea Charms has 5 pages in it.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on April 14, 2005, 09:38:35 PM
Quote:

why she doesnt go nude online is a mystery.?

if you want nude..hmm... go through her yahoo fan club...

and buy her older merchandise. like fanfair 01





I suppose this is easy to complain. After some idots did silly comments about her tummy, she soon stopped to post such picture sets.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 14, 2005, 09:52:02 PM
really? weird stuff man. She is nothing but beatiful. why would she be ashamed of that?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Googie on April 14, 2005, 10:28:09 PM
The story I've heard is she has a hysterectomy or appendectomy scar she is self conscious about.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Bababooey86 on April 28, 2005, 02:28:28 AM
How long did the video take to get to you?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 28, 2005, 09:09:00 AM
Quote:

After a second viewing of the DVD, I distincly heard the words "BE ARCHIVE" uttered by a gentleman chatting with Chelsea.  Anybody want to fess up?  It would be cool to put a face and name together.




There are for certain several BEarchive people walking around there(and I mena besides D+J). lol. after all it the 'center of the big boob universe'(like Jane wrote in Score's report)

BTW, I really love the music choice on that disc.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on April 28, 2005, 10:04:02 AM
Quote:

Can't anyone post some images from it? Or link to a place where they sell it, maybe there's some pictures there.




well HELLOOOO, of course Chelsea sells it on her official site  

http://www.chelseacharms.com/expo/expodvd.html

a must buy for fans of awesome big huge implanted tits
(the other must buy in 2005 would be toystory 2 with kayla and maxi)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: USER_8776_NOT_FOUND on June 17, 2005, 05:34:34 PM
i was wondering if Chelsea's able to swim,

and if she is do her boobs float or sink (they're filled with fluid so i dont know)

and do her boobs absorb water like a sponge?

that was al folks
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dingus on June 17, 2005, 08:24:29 PM
Quote:

i was wondering if Chelsea's able to swim,

and if she is do her boobs float or sink (they're filled with fluid so i dont know)

and do her boobs absorb water like a sponge?

that was al folks




Can she swim? I dunno.

Do they float? I doubt it.

Do they absorb water? No.

Sorry I couldn't help
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 17, 2005, 10:26:59 PM
uummm. what kind of questions are these? LOL
cmon. she isnt someone along the lines of  spongeboob squarepants

her boobs expand from inside lol. nothing spongy about that.

as far as swimming goes, I remember she has done some pool stuff in her early shoots.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: MunchWolf on June 18, 2005, 03:13:19 AM
Quote:

cmon. she isnt someone along the lines of  spongeboob squarepants
 




hmmmmm....

MunchWolf:Are you ready buddies?
Buddies:Aye, aye Munchwolf!
MunchWolf:I can't hear you!
Buddies:AYE AYE MUNCHWOLF!
MunchWolf:OOOOOOOOOOOH!
MunchWolf: Whose breasts are like melons to all that can see?
Buddies:Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf:Bouncy and pink and growing is she?
Buddies:Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf:If erotical pleasures be something you need!
Buddies:Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf:Then drop your trousers and flog with your reed!
Buddies: Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf: Ready!?!
All: Chelsea Roundboobs! Chelsea Roundboobs! Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf:Chel- sea Round- boobs!
MunchWolf:ah ha ha ha ah har har har

-Munch "I wouldn't mind dropping to a deck and flopping like a fish with her" Wolf
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: King_Reol on June 18, 2005, 04:36:57 AM
That was awesome.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: RB on June 18, 2005, 02:00:17 PM
Melonie Charm should be able to answer this one.

Melonie? Can you swim with yours? Do you think Chelsea can swim?
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: titmouse on June 18, 2005, 06:03:27 PM
You now owe me a keyboard.
I just ruined the one I was useing because of the coke coming out my nose.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: NeoMyztikX on June 18, 2005, 07:42:25 PM
jesus christ how do you come up with this stuff
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: G_I_John on June 18, 2005, 07:46:29 PM
Quote:

Quote:

cmon. she isnt someone along the lines of  spongeboob squarepants
 




hmmmmm....

MunchWolf:Are you ready buddies?
Buddies:Aye, aye Munchwolf!
MunchWolf:I can't hear you!
Buddies:AYE AYE MUNCHWOLF!
MunchWolf:OOOOOOOOOOOH!
MunchWolf: Whose breasts are like melons to all that can see?
Buddies:Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf:Bouncy and pink and growing is she?
Buddies:Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf:If erotical pleasures be something you need!
Buddies:Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf:Then drop your trousers and flog with your reed!
Buddies: Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf: Ready!?!
All: Chelsea Roundboobs! Chelsea Roundboobs! Chelsea Roundboobs!
MunchWolf:Chel- sea Round- boobs!
MunchWolf:ah ha ha ha ah har har har

-Munch "I wouldn't mind dropping to a deck and flopping like a fish with her" Wolf





*dies laughing*

G_I "This calls for a ROFLMAO ^_^." _John
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Hentaibee on June 18, 2005, 08:39:10 PM
well, as a part time search engine rank engineer, I can tell you bob is also a common typo for boob :-)
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Dr_Fashizzle on June 19, 2005, 03:23:29 AM
Top hit on Google Images for "sponge boob"...

http://blog.aaronjameslee.com/AJL/_IMAGES/thumbs/SpongeBoob_02.html

Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Offline on June 23, 2005, 06:22:19 PM
King Bedevere: "Tell me, Does wood sink in water?"
Angry Mob: "No, no, it floats."
Angry Mob: "Throw her into the pond!"
King Bedevere: "What also floats in water?"
Angry Mob: "Bread, apples, very small rocks, cider, gravy, cherries, mud, churches, lead..."
King Arthur: "A duck!"
King Bedevere: "Exactly! So, logically....."
Angry Mob: "If she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood."
King Bedevere: "And therefore?"
Angry Mob: "A Witch!"
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Splicer_ik on June 23, 2005, 07:16:57 PM
Quote:

King Bedevere: "Tell me, Does wood sink in water?"
Angry Mob: "No, no, it floats."
Angry Mob: "Throw her into the pond!"
King Bedevere: "What also floats in water?"
Angry Mob: "Bread, apples, very small rocks, cider, gravy, cherries, mud, churches, lead..."
King Arthur: "A duck!"
King Bedevere: "Exactly! So, logically....."
Angry Mob: "If she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood."
King Bedevere: "And therefore?"
Angry Mob: "A Witch!"


Gotta love Monty Python humor ^^
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Tugboatcap on June 23, 2005, 11:56:57 PM
I have a lawyer friend who doesn't see that bit as humor!  Now that's scary....


Tugboatcap!
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: pedonbio on June 24, 2005, 09:24:11 AM
Tug, your friend has tried too many jury cases.

Or not enough.

Or maybe he opted for humor deprivation surgery to get into law school.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
Post by: Brinker on June 24, 2005, 12:39:37 PM
I found this on some website ages ago. I hope it helps in answering the question.
Title: Re: The Chelsea Charms 2001-? thread MERGED
P