Bill
inactive
C Cup
Posts: 144
|
 |
« on: June 10, 2005, 12:14:01 AM » |
|
Does anyone know what Tiffany Towers real size was? Her website lists her as 70FFF. She might have been a FFF, but I don't think she had 70 inch breasts.
Bill
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Have you ever wished you could see things from your dog's point of view? |
|
|
|
automatic
B Cup
Posts: 69
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2005, 12:57:30 AM » |
|
I've wondered this too. I would like to see a list of the actual sizes of all the classic models, but I don't know if those sizes are determinable.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
melonie_charm
F Cup
Posts: 1147
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2005, 05:23:50 AM » |
|
Are you asking what Tiffany's bustline measurement and cup size were when she had her former silicone implants ? My best guess would be about 45" and about an H cup.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BigFan
D Cup
Posts: 270
Legally Adult
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2005, 09:07:04 AM » |
|
Melonie,
For many reasons, I think you are an angel.
BigFan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bobolio
A Cup
Posts: 24
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2005, 11:42:13 AM » |
|
Yah it'd be rather unimaginable that someone so skinny had a 70 inch ribcage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Palomine
Global Moderator
Omega Cup
Posts: 19646
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2005, 12:55:10 PM » |
|
Quote:
Yah it'd be rather unimaginable that someone so skinny had a 70 inch ribcage.
Yes. Come on now! We're all big boys and can admit we understand all those fictionalized measurements for publicity purposes. Mel's guess is probably spot-on. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
3deroticer
R Cup
Posts: 7196
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2005, 01:35:53 PM » |
|
when they get a measurement of 70+ inches, are they taking measurement inside surface of the cleavage as well?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Remember, life is too short to actually get annoyed about what someone you don’t know, don’t care about, and don’t like thinks about you and what you enjoy doing.
|
|
|
doggo
in memoriam
L Cup
Posts: 4258
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2005, 02:39:35 PM » |
|
No, they're just pig-ignorant magazine publishers who assume that their readers have no more of a clue than they themselves have.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
automatic
B Cup
Posts: 69
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2005, 03:52:36 PM » |
|
I dunno - you think she was only three cup sizes bigger than a DD? That sounds like too little...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RB
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2005, 04:16:21 PM » |
|
I think Melonie's assessment is pretty close to the mark.
Tiffany was roughly about the size of Traci Topps, possibly a little smaller. She had a thin frame, but fairly broad shoulders.
Traci was 36J, so I'd place Tiffany around 38H or 38I.
As WikiPedia says, it's fairly common for models and dancers to publish misleading measurements, or for magazines to publish wonky sizes to wow readers. Though some appear to make up measurements, a common middle ground is to give what appears to be a bra size (43G for example) but is actually a bra + cup size combined with a bust diameter.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bill
inactive
C Cup
Posts: 144
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2005, 04:33:37 PM » |
|
Thanks Melonie,
It's always nice to see your cantelopes and read your enlightened responses.
Bill
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Have you ever wished you could see things from your dog's point of view?
|
|
|
Dawg
inactive
A Cup
Posts: 26
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2005, 05:29:50 PM » |
|
guys, it probably in cm just around the rib cage. 70 cm is 27 in.
She is Canadian and we use the metric system.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Agent_Smith
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2005, 05:50:08 PM » |
|
I miss when Tiffany use to be huge.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
doggo
in memoriam
L Cup
Posts: 4258
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2005, 06:31:54 PM » |
|
Quote:
...it probably in cm just around the rib cage. 70 cm is 27 in.
That's a possibility, although it wouldn't fit in with roobarb's estimate of a 38" bra size. I'd tend to go for a 32"-whatever cup, as Tiff surely wasn't as big as all that. 27" round the chest could be consistent with a 32" bra size.
A lot of dogs around here. I hope they don't all start fighting and making a noise.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tsunami2k
F Cup
Posts: 1136
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 10, 2005, 10:05:21 PM » |
|
she was around and H cup
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Norse
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2005, 06:48:28 AM » |
|
Even though Tiffany unfortunately removed those great implants, I must say she still has that wonderful radiance of a sexy funloving woman, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
melonie_charm
F Cup
Posts: 1147
|
|
« Reply #21 on: June 11, 2005, 12:23:55 PM » |
|
Quote:
Any idea what brand/type of implant Tiff had (beyond silicone) ?
Given the timing, there is a strong probability that Tiff's implants were made by Dow Silicone before the early 90's lawsuits got into full swing. Remember that prior to the Dow lawsuits (1992-3?), it was not only possible but downright simple and affordable for American girls to obtain just about any size Dow Silicone implants they wanted from any US plastic surgeon who was willing to put them in. After the lawsuits and damage awards, the FDA banned silicone implants and established strict testing criteria for saline implants. This eventually took US made but low sales volume large saline implants off the table as well (due to potential $100,000+ FDA approval testing costs for each different sized implant, versus a very low projected number of huge implants to be sold each year over which those testing costs would have to be recouped).
It's also interesting but a bit frustrating to note that, because of changes in the economics of the huge boob industry over the last few years, that Tiff has not chosen to pursue having her current 800cc (guess) implants replaced with huge custom made implants again. Again this comes back to the huge boob business migrating away from 'show' business and heavily towards 'sex' business. Tiff never did have any problem doing XXX or escorting in the past, and her apparent choice not to invest in implants larger than her current ones is testament to where the real money is to be found in this industry today ! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
UncleSam
|
|
« Reply #22 on: June 11, 2005, 01:47:52 PM » |
|
The club in Ottawa was Fanny's on Bank street, which is no longer. None of the current clubs are anything like that one. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Norse
|
|
« Reply #23 on: June 11, 2005, 01:54:01 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MaxBigfoot
P Cup
Posts: 6134
Maximum Manga Maven
|
|
« Reply #24 on: June 11, 2005, 01:58:58 PM » |
|
Tiffany was only 18 in 1989? So she's only 33-34 now. Man, it's nice to know she's going to be nice looking and in great shape for years to come. Judging from the post huge implant pic posted, she's just great to look at now, even without the huge ones. Good for her!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
MaxBigfoot
|
|
|
|
ZoD
|
|
« Reply #25 on: June 11, 2005, 03:05:30 PM » |
|
I actually think that her pre op size was nicer.I prefer a more realistic busty size, and she unfortunately never floated my boat in her "huge" days. Looks nice now. Thats heresy isnt it? Please throw those flaming stones nicely. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
EVERYONE LOVES TIFA!!!!!!
«Zoneofdecay on the outside, tasty on the inside.»
|
|
|
|
Argyle
|
|
« Reply #26 on: June 11, 2005, 05:15:19 PM » |
|
Not sure what "size" she was at here, or at what point in her augmentation history this was taken, but when I saw this, she became one of only three of the "giant implant" models that have ever earned a place on my list of favorites. I think she got that bigger set after this, but IMHO they never looked as good as this--these actually looked somewhat natural, at least out of a bra/top
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
danball1976
D Cup
Posts: 420
|
|
« Reply #27 on: June 11, 2005, 11:44:49 PM » |
|
I don't know if you notice, but I do believe that is a morph. It has "shadow" down there in the lower left.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argyle
|
|
« Reply #30 on: June 12, 2005, 08:56:18 AM » |
|
Quote:
I don't know if you notice, but I do believe that is a morph. It has "shadow" down there in the lower left.
Was picked up from a newsgroup. In newsgroups, it is customary for the poster to "claim" a photo he/she may have scanned by stamping a name on it. No indication that is a morph. I have three different versions of that picture, all the same, and I don't think all three could have been morphed, for what it's worth. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lesbian Bob
|
|
« Reply #31 on: June 12, 2005, 12:22:32 PM » |
|
Boy, that Lone Ranger sure gets around.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
GA_Matt
|
|
« Reply #32 on: June 12, 2005, 04:56:45 PM » |
|
Quote:
The club in Ottawa was Fanny's on Bank street, which is no longer. None of the current clubs are anything like that one.
Ahh, Fanny's Cabaret I saw Valerie Fields there way back when. I used to go there, but Started going to Pigale/Barefax later... just a nicer place ya know?
It closed a few years ago (about 6-7?) and re-opened in the market I think as the Oasis, and opened again as Fanny's but I haven't had time (nor cash and leave from my GF) to look around. Truth be told, I haven't had the inclination either. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Computers are useless,
They only give you Answers"
- Pablo Picasso
"Never offend someone with
style, when you can offend
them with substance."
- Sam Browne
|
|
|
|
Stioup
C Cup
Posts: 149
|
|
« Reply #33 on: June 12, 2005, 05:13:00 PM » |
|
can anybody tell me when the new "Faster Pussycats XXX" will be presented et enable?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Norse
|
|
« Reply #34 on: June 12, 2005, 06:48:19 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
