*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3133
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #15 on: April 01, 2006, 09:19:14 AM »
Quote:

Quote:

I could nit pick all day but in the end it's back it's popular and that's good. It was a hell of a long wait since 1989.




Tom Baker.      



Tom Baker was superb but my Doctor has to be Peter Davison.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

collared_cherri

  • Z Cup
  • 3315
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2006, 01:20:42 PM »
I always found it difficult to separate Jon Pertwee from his Worzel Gummidge character so could never take him seriously as the Doctor.
"Everybody needs a bosom for a pillow..." Cornershop - Brimful of Asha

*

MasterX0

  • Mister Master
  • 2252
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2006, 03:30:58 PM »
Tom Baker and Peter Davidson for me.  I think the hr does rush it, but they couldnt do the old format of Docotr Who.  Well  maybe lol
Master"they need a new K-9 too"X0
Men who love big breasts, have large smile.
"Running away doesnt solve a fucking thing" - Al Swearengen
If you can not say what you mean,
You will never mean what you say.
"I'll find out when I get there." - ME
Offical Boobie Massager of: Keisha, Bambi, Buffie
Trade Master of mCI
There is only 1 TRUE MASTER
Becuase its no fun being an illegal alien.

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53281
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2006, 08:45:28 PM »
Tom Baker. That scarf he wore presaged the Harry Potter/Gryfindor thing.  

Plus, the theme music is one of the best ever to come out of the BBC Radiophonic Workshop...which was probably just two guys in a shed somewhere, but doesn't sound more imperial and official?

Look forward to ever watching any of the new series, though, it's been a hell of a long wait.
ACB, BK, CT, NG, SA: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3133
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #19 on: April 02, 2006, 03:11:27 AM »
Quote:

Tom Baker and Peter Davidson for me.  I think the hr does rush it, but they couldnt do the old format of Docotr Who.  Well  maybe lol
Master"they need a new K-9 too"X0



Funny you should mention K9...
If you don't want to know anything about season 2 don't watch this link. If you're not bothered watch away.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/check...wm=1&bbwm=1
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

StevenWebguy

  • Banned User
  • 330
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #20 on: April 02, 2006, 06:45:50 AM »
Oh... where do I start?

My first gripe they changed the number of regenerations a Time Lord is suppose to have when they did that TV movie and replaced Sylvester McCoy with Paul McGann. Paul McGann would have been the last incarnation if they had not so though.
My second gripe is that I have heard that a second movie or a mini series was done for the BBC exclusivly with Paul McGann as the Doctor that was called "The War of Time" that for some reason has never aired here. This is the lead in for my Third gripe.
What is this Last time Lord S*! Why the new Doctor? What WAR? With WHOM? Any war that would get all of the Timelords involved must be pretty damn serious as they usually only meddle when people are screwing around with Time. It is certainly serious enough to actually let us know WTF happened!
I do like the job that the new guy is doind so far, he has gotten most of the usual Doctor quirks down and he is not trying to hard like Peter Davison and Colin Baker did.
I do not like the short episodes as I am still used to the 2-3hour stories that were being done back when Tom Baker was The Doctor.
I like that they are taking advantage of modern FX and I can't wait to see how they handle the new versions of the old enemies like the Cybermen.
So as long as they eventually answer just how the hell only one Time Lord is left and a planet that was protected by a time displacment field was destroyed I think I will really enjoy the new show.

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3133
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #21 on: April 02, 2006, 07:31:45 AM »
Quote:

...My first gripe they changed the number of regenerations a Time Lord is suppose to have when they did that TV movie and replaced Sylvester McCoy with Paul McGann. Paul McGann would have been the last incarnation if they had not so though...



Fraid not mate.
The Doctor can regenerate 12 times which make a total of 13 incarnations. McCoy was no7, McGann was 8, Ecclestone was 9 and Tennant is number 10.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

doggo

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 4244
    • flyingrabbits.tv
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #22 on: April 02, 2006, 07:34:11 AM »
Yes, this thread was always in danger of turning into Mastermind.  
doggo - the original doggo. There'll never be another
Flying Rabbits Video
And lots of other stuff

*

StevenWebguy

  • Banned User
  • 330
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #23 on: April 02, 2006, 08:30:01 AM »
Quote:

Quote:

...My first gripe they changed the number of regenerations a Time Lord is suppose to have when they did that TV movie and replaced Sylvester McCoy with Paul McGann. Paul McGann would have been the last incarnation if they had not so though...



Fraid not mate.
The Doctor can regenerate 12 times which make a total of 13 incarnations. McCoy was no7, McGann was 8, Ecclestone was 9 and Tennant is number 10.




You need to watch The Three Doctors, The Deadly Assassin, or Castrovalva again.
The Deadly assassin would be best because it gets repeated a number of times how it is impossible for "The Master" to have regenerated a ninth time.

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3133
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #24 on: April 02, 2006, 08:44:37 AM »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

...My first gripe they changed the number of regenerations a Time Lord is suppose to have when they did that TV movie and replaced Sylvester McCoy with Paul McGann. Paul McGann would have been the last incarnation if they had not so though...



Fraid not mate.
The Doctor can regenerate 12 times which make a total of 13 incarnations. McCoy was no7, McGann was 8, Ecclestone was 9 and Tennant is number 10.




You need to watch The Three Doctors, The Deadly Assassin, or Castrovalva again.
The Deadly assassin would be best because it gets repeated a number of times how it is impossible for "The Master" to have regenerated a ninth time.



I really think you're wrong.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3133
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #25 on: April 02, 2006, 08:49:26 AM »
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_(Doctor_Who)
Quote:

 With Delgado's death, the Master disappeared from the series for several years. In his next appearance, in The Deadly Assassin (1976), the Master appeared as an emaciated, decaying wreck (played by Peter Pratt under heavy make-up). Although Time Lords have the potential to postpone death by completely renewing their bodies, the ability can only be used twelve times. The Master had used up all twelve of his regenerations, and was nearing the end of his thirteenth and final life. It is not clear if the Master had any regenerations between the Delgado incarnation and the Pratt one, or which incarnation the Delgado Master was.[2]



01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3133
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #26 on: April 02, 2006, 08:51:44 AM »
Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_%28Doctor_Who%29#The_Doctor.27s_regenerations
 
Quote:

 It was established in The Deadly Assassin that a Time Lord can regenerate twelve times before permanently dying, though as with most such "rules" there were occasionally exceptions (for more on this see Time Lord). In The Christmas Invasion it was stated the regenerative cycle creates a large amount of energy that suffuses the Time Lord's body. As demonstrated by the Tenth Doctor for the first time in that story, in the first fifteen hours of regeneration this energy is enough to even rapidly regrow a severed hand.



01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3133
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #27 on: April 02, 2006, 08:53:01 AM »
I know Wikipedia can be wrong but I'm a bit of a Doctor Who anorak lol so trust me.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

MunchWolf

  • What Tagline?
  • 11466
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #28 on: April 02, 2006, 12:33:52 PM »
yup ... it's 12 regenerations ...

anyway ... looking at that spoiler ... is that a new doctor already???

-Munch "And what are they going to do when this doc gets to 12?" Wolf

*

StevenWebguy

  • Banned User
  • 330
Re: The New Doctor Who
« Reply #29 on: April 02, 2006, 03:44:46 PM »
Yes, but I own a copy of it.
It is also the first episode I watched on TV.
I will pencil in some time to watch it so I can count how many times is mentioned the number of times "The Master" had already regenerated and therefore it was impossible for him to be alive. I am 90% certain it is a single diget #. Also, we need to remember that the sixth incarnation of The Doctor sacrificed a regeneration to save his female companion. So even if Timelords are suppose to have 12 regenerations (and I don't think they are) The Doctor only has 11.