*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24033
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Enormous big real boob vid
« Reply #15 on: September 06, 2006, 08:24:09 AM »
Quote:

Quote:

But there's nothing to refute that they're over 18 either.  This was one aspect of the **18** ban that baffled me.  Half the porn online lacks those types of disclamers, **18** isn't special.




Dear jwatson,

I agree!  One would think that if **18** is worthy of prohibition, then the same would be true of youtube.  Despite the popularity of these two services, it should be noted that both are capable of providing und3rag3d content.

Based on that, google should probably be verbotten here also, as it can be used to search for und3raged content also.

 Those sick bastards at Google!!

Kindest regards!

Bone...




I can't believe that we have to go through this again: YES, of course pre-18 content exists at sources OTHER than **18**. HOWEVER, in an effort to keep the BEA rules as concise as possible (in this complex and litigous world) we ONLY explicitly prohibit posting sources (ie: **18**) that we KNOW (from experience) to be frequent problems. Thus, when **18** first came online and we were having to chase literally dozens of semi/demi/iffy-underag3 pix and posts off the forums each week (sourced from **18**) it was eventually decided that to keep the BEA safe, ALL content from **18** (etc..., see the rules) would be prohibited here from that point on.

Thus, NO content from **18** can be linked/pointed to from the BEA, even if the subject is obviously over 18... this is the only way we can protect the site from the liability that hosting underag3 content creates. And rest assured, if at some point, forum posts to Youtube become a constant/consistent problem (re: iffy-underag3 subjects) that too may find itself on the prohibited source list as well. I hope that our users will exercise common sense AND discretion in what they post here so that such a youtube ban never happens... after all it is BEA Users (and what they post here) that actually prompt the creation of additional rules/prohibitions.  

*

Bonecracker

  • X Cup
  • 2785
  • member since 1995
    • How to understand moderators
Re: Enormous big real boob vid
« Reply #16 on: September 06, 2006, 10:21:23 AM »
Dear Palomine...

Sorry about that nerve I hit with the full impact of the dentist's drill on '90'.  I assure you that I had a big smile on my face, and the post was tongue in cheek, and I'm certain from all we've seen from behavior of good members around here that NO ONE wants to post anything questionable!

And also, consider that as popular as youtube is right now, they draw a lot of attention to themselves and thus anything questionable is going to be dealt with LONG before it gets to the BEA>

Kindest regards, extending a great big hug and heartfelt thanks in advance for your understanding and agreement,

Bone...


WARNING:
This post may contain items including, but not limited to, sarcasm, irony, hyperbole intended to bring humor to this discussion. Those of you without a sense of humor, best ignore my posts.
There's a lot of internet out there, be sure to look around!

*

hugejugglover

  • P Cup
  • 1368
Re: Enormous big real boob vid
« Reply #17 on: September 06, 2006, 12:27:04 PM »
Quote:

I know this is an old post but I just have to give my 2 cents. From the pics you posted of april chest I can easily bet everything that I own that that's not the same person. I mean, tripledddlover is clearly all natural (I've seen quite a few of her clips and I can tell) while april is one of the most obviously fake-breasted woman I have seen in some time. No question imo.



I totally agree.