*

g0ddmode

  • G Cup
  • 935
Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« on: July 23, 2006, 04:51:56 PM »
I am currently compiling a database of information and statistics on female entertainers. I was collecting information on Janet Lupo, and I came across some interesting stuff on the www. There is a camp out there that compares Lupo to Verkaik. They are pro Verkaik.

The Verkaik camp claims that Petra's boobs are larger than Lupos. Was there ever a final verdict? And despite all of this biggest boobed playmate talk, I rarely hear anyone mention Rosemarie Hillcrest.

Personally, I like them both. Theyre both hot. I just hope Petra looks as hot as Lupo, when she is 56.

Anyway, I thought I would take a poll, and see whose boobs were the biggest.

*

bignatslover

  • P Cup
  • 3982
    • I love the BEA
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2006, 05:02:56 PM »
Well I went with the obvious answer to the "bigger boobs" question which of course is Janet Lupo.

HOWEVER, I have a bigger place in my heart for Petra.  The many snippets of Petra V I saw starting in the 80's really made my heart go boom-boom-boom, compared to Janet's effects.  Petra really was/is something great!
Give me a busty girl at the local county fair over any of Hollywood's finest any day!

*

Canyon

  • B Cup
  • 31
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2006, 07:34:49 PM »
Well, IMPOSSIBLE to do a compareson between these two models, even though Verkaik's are similar to Janet's.
The reason? Easy to understand:
Petra Verkaik hasn't 100% natural boobs.
Petra did surgery operation on them and they have not a natural pose.
Nowdays we see several models having trouble with web press about their lies on the naturality of their breasts.
Lindsey Dawn McKenzie just before rumours around did breasts reduction and said good-bye to modelling, Anya Swan aka Princess the same old story and in some blogs came out the sorry truth...
Janet Lupo did not plastic surgery operations on their boobs but just on her face.

*

JohnFogerty

  • C Cup
  • 70
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2006, 07:40:55 PM »
Janet Lupo rules and
she has got one of the best natural tits ever!
I heard something about Petra's fake tits: ya, I thought the same 'cause her juggs sometimes seem not so natural.

*

DJPFC

  • Z Cup
  • 7584
    • http://www.pinupfiles.com
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2006, 08:49:47 PM »
You're talking about two of the all-time greats.  Impossible to say who is better.  They both have even aged amazingly well.  Two of my absolute faves, although I have to give the personal nod to Petra, since she was my first introduction to the world of big-breasted Playmates.
Check out our brand new, fully re-booted mega-site, PinupFiles/PinupGlam!  Featuring the best and hottest big boobed pinup gals on the web!



*

Scotchman

  • G Cup
  • 926
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2006, 03:42:30 AM »
Quote:

Petra did surgery operation on them and they have not a natural pose.




When did Petra have a surgery operation?
She is 39 now, and given her size, I'd not
be surprised if she had a lift. But I've
not seen signs of it (ie - scarring or not
a natural pose).
"Every time you eat a steak, a hippy's hacky-sack goes in the gutter."
~ Patton Oswalt

*

jwatson

  • banned user
  • 795
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2006, 10:36:32 PM »
 
Quote:

 Petra Verkaik hasn't 100% natural boobs.
 




Afraid I'm also gonna have to disagree with you and ask for your source.  Here's a thread were her natural boobs get discussed at length.  

http://forum.bearchive.com/showflat.php?...true#Post460173

She may have been lifted recently since she's pushing 40 but she never had a surgical size increas.  Exhibit A - a laying down shot.

*

Canyon

  • B Cup
  • 31
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #7 on: July 25, 2006, 10:00:22 AM »
Well, you do not just think the surgery implants as something about Chalsie Charms, Kayla Kleavage, Sabrok, Minka, or Jenna Jameson...
I mean, there are several ways to increase and re-touch tits and visage, lips, thighs....
Lindsey Dawn McKenzie is a real example of that...
The same Anya Swan aka Princess.
Absolutely Petra Verkaik (that I really like a lot) is not a total natural beauty.
Nadine Jansen's got a 100% natural breats and it is rather clear in her videos.
My source is because I am in this field.

*

greenmartian

  • E Cup
  • 258
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #8 on: July 25, 2006, 07:29:49 PM »
Seeing this thread prompted me to provide a response.

Let me provide a preamble..and then go into my contribution here....

a) I know Petra Verkaik personally; she knows who I am, I know who she is; She knows where I live, I know where she lives; etc.  We communicate frequently, up to, and including today.

b) Petra has not ever had breast enhancement surgery, nor has she had breast lifting surgery.  And she is not considering either.

c) Petra has visited a surgeon back in the 1990s to have a benign cyst removed from one of her breasts....if you look carefully at the photos (when make-up isn't used on the area), you will be able to see the scar (which isn't big or obvious)...on the side of one....

d) If any of you are depending on Wikipedia to provide you with accurate data, you are, in this case, going to be sorely misled.  (Example:  Her middle name is not what is posted--it's Charlotte)

e) as to whether or whither Janet Lupo has bigger boobs or not, is immaterial.  You either think that either or both Girls are Hottt, or you don't.

f) I am not a self-annoited "expert"....just a guy who knows.

I hope that my posting will lay to rest any further rumors about Petra being artificial in the physical dept.

*

TyWebb

  • D Cup
  • 205
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #9 on: July 25, 2006, 08:32:23 PM »
Quote:

Petra has not ever had breast enhancement surgery, nor has she had breast lifting surgery.  And she is not considering either.
 




Well, that's interesting to hear. I hope that you are right. I want to believe, as Mulder used to say.

From my observations, through video of course, I would have figured that at some point Petra has had -

A) a nose job, could just be makeup I suppose.

B) a breast lift, but I could have been deceived by the surgical procedure you described.

C) a pregnancy at some point in the early '90's because of what appeared to be a rapid weight gain between the second and third of the Playboy Wet N' Wild videos series.

These are just my perceptions mind you and I'm always glad to be wrong about these things. I am wrong aren't I?

*

yali892000

  • D Cup
  • 186
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #10 on: July 25, 2006, 09:33:19 PM »
Quote:

C) a pregnancy at some point in the early '90's because of what appeared to be a rapid weight gain between the second and third of the Playboy Wet N' Wild videos series.




Sometimes a weight gain is just a weight gain. BTW, Petra looks better heavier anyway.

*

Scotchman

  • G Cup
  • 926
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #11 on: July 25, 2006, 10:44:32 PM »
Quote:

My source is because I am in this field.




Why are you in a field? It's very hot outside.
Get back inside the house this instant, young man.
At least find some shade under a tree. You may
already have heat-stroke.

I am underwhelmed by your expert opinion and
illogical conjecture. Providing photographic
examples of scarring or unnatural appearance
would support your argument. But standing in
a field is more convincing that just saying,
"Believe me because I say so".
"Every time you eat a steak, a hippy's hacky-sack goes in the gutter."
~ Patton Oswalt

*

jwatson

  • banned user
  • 795
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #12 on: July 25, 2006, 11:44:42 PM »
I'm forced to second Scotchman and Greenmartian although I have no field experience nor am I presently standing in a field.  Canyon's ramble appears to me to be no more than a guess.  I've seen a lot of porn, touched and played with large fake and real boobs.  If there's one consistent, it's the general lack of bounce and wobble in fake boobs.  Petra's do both expertly and beautifully.  I'm aware that there are levels fakeness, but whether or not anybody here knows her personally or is a surgical expert - none of which can be confirmed through this website - I'm 90% sure she's real.  One needs only to look at her old pics to see this.  Boob jobs of 1989 simply were not that convincing.  Exhibit B.

*

DTM

  • G Cup
  • 832
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #13 on: July 26, 2006, 12:40:31 AM »
I know Greenmartin and what he says is true
Plus I have been with Petra at a few conventions.
Seen her up close and personal.


thank you

PS I should add Petra has the biggest boobs.
 We  meet once a week to chat with her...
She should make one of them stolen home videos.

*

charfire2002

  • A Cup
  • 6
Re: Janet Lupo VS Petra Verkaik...
« Reply #14 on: July 26, 2006, 12:59:17 AM »
Quote:

C) a pregnancy at some point in the early '90's because of what appeared to be a rapid weight gain between the second and third of the Playboy Wet N' Wild videos series.




Petra was actually heavy at one point? In all the pics of her that I've seen she is really thin. Do you happen to have a pic of her from this time period because that will be interesting to see?