^Agreed; It is almost mind boggling that the FDA declared that they are the sole power in deciding what size implants a woman can have, but to those of us in the medical field, extremely illogical decisions have become expected from the FDA, some stretching the imagination with the most rational explanations leading down the rabbit hole of conspiracy theories. With C19, they were aware of attenuation methods, yet when people were becoming aware, they quickly moved to removed a vital component that had been OTC for over half a century, using an incredibly stupid excuse.
I think over the coming decade that we will see expandable implants expanding their market share; when more women discover that they can have a dependable product that does not restrict them to the size of their initial decision. Naturally, since about 60% wish they had gone larger to start, this will be seen as a smart and viable alternative. And naturally, this will lead to an increased implant size overall, which will change social perceptions. At one time, 275cc was the norm; today it is more like 475cc; with expanders, that number may quickly grow. One thing that would be a great addition is adding anchoring availability to the upper base so that it could be screwed into a rib and avoid the costly internal bra.
While AI may make altering appearance easier, IMHO, the CGI effects of today are already quite convincing. We are no longer seeing guys in rubbers suits playing aliens as in 1980 Star Wars, but whether it is Rocket & Groot or Jar Jar & General Grievous droid armies, we tend to see the interactions as so good that our minds just accept that they are actually there.