Never been on board with the rationale that suggests that a picture someone posts in the public domain, is private property. I understand the whole copyright issue, though I do not support it as adjudicated over 100 years ago with the creation of "intellectual property," and even as the SCOTUS exceeded their authority and wrote law, it is a ground that needs to be revisited; the world has changed since the internet and posting a picture is not in the same realm as it was in 1890 when it was in a book. I can remember the argument here, maybe 20 years ago; the who, what, and where of people that could be posted; with 8+ billion people on earth, that is an impossible task; knowing the identity of every individual, rendering, origin of image, and so forth is absurd . When copying and sharing is just a click away, I would suggest antiquated laws are literally impossible to enforce; images from every walk of life, from people to movies, scenery to art, are copied and pasted billions of times a day by hundreds of millions of people. We hear all the time that once you put a image "out there" it will forever be subject to public scrutiny and sharing, which is essentially an acknowledgement that posting your picture online relinquishes control. Pretty sure there is also a facet of the law that states that sharing public images is legal when no compensation is sought and it could also be argued if an image, once posted online, is in fact, a public image. Just my humble opinion.