Breast Expansion Archive Forum

Discussions => General Discussion => Topic started by: Lexx on November 14, 2006, 08:40:24 PM

Title: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Lexx on November 14, 2006, 08:40:24 PM
She's quite impressive:
 web page

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DruulEmpire on November 15, 2006, 06:09:46 AM
With that name, I was worried that she'd be scaly, with a spoonlike feature on her forehead ...

VERY NICE!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Norse on November 15, 2006, 06:25:54 AM
WOW
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Loverofbigtits on November 15, 2006, 06:52:08 AM
Very pretty girl...would like to see topless.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TripleB on November 15, 2006, 09:43:25 PM
I'm glad someone else mad the spoon head comment before I did...she's hot.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ImplementsOfOuch on November 15, 2006, 09:46:17 PM
Quote:

I'm glad someone else mad the spoon head comment before I did...she's hot.


Agreed, she is good looking. Looks like she has a hair stuck in her cleavage. O_O
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: danball1976 on November 15, 2006, 09:50:07 PM
Quote:

With that name, I was worried that she'd be scaly, with a spoonlike feature on her forehead ...

VERY NICE!




I didn't get it at first until I looked at her last name.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: adlion944 on February 08, 2007, 04:19:59 PM
http://wwtdd.com/index.phtml?t=KIM+KARDASHIAN

The question is... does it have hardcore sex with good lighting and camerawork, or camera work more reminiscent of UFO or bigfoot sighting quality (Keely Hazel)?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SwitcherX on February 08, 2007, 11:56:44 PM
www.kimksuperstar.com
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Cel on February 09, 2007, 04:16:24 AM
I think I speak for about 98% of the people here ... Kim who ?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: adlion944 on February 09, 2007, 07:04:45 PM
Talentless waste of space socialite with fantastic body who is friends with Paris Hilton.

She is also the daughter of famous lawyer Kardashian (from the OJ trial) though his first name escapes me.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on February 09, 2007, 07:20:28 PM
ah.  well she's much hotter than paris at least.  mabye the video will reveal she does have some talents after all....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gration5 on February 10, 2007, 12:45:55 AM
Quote:

She is also the daughter of now deceased lawyer Robert Kardashian (from the OJ trial).


Fixed.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Lexx on February 10, 2007, 07:59:59 AM
 
Quote:

The question is... does it have hardcore sex with good lighting and camerawork, or camera work more reminiscent of UFO or bigfoot sighting quality (Keely Hazel)?  




Judging by the preview, there was a full team filming it. What's funny is that they try to make us believe that it was a homemade tape that got leaked when there is clearly a third person behind the camera.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SwitcherX on February 11, 2007, 11:46:02 PM
 Kim Kardashian, better known as Paris Hilton's hefty sidekick has a sex tape coming out, in the event you never read this site, and this is a preview of her cunt that you will soon be seeing getting suffed hard...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: hangin2low on February 12, 2007, 04:28:40 PM
Quote:

  Judging by the preview, there was a full team filming it. What's funny is that they try to make us believe that it was a homemade tape that got leaked when there is clearly a third person behind the camera.




Naah . . . I disagree with that assessment.  I have around 5 different clips so far, almost 3 1/2 minutes, and don't see any evidence of that at all.

BTW, have you (plural) seen the Vivid BACK cover yet?  I haven't seen it mentioned anywhere at all.  Go to kimksuperstar.com to see it.  You might have to open an account (free) with Vivid to do so.  At least 3 pix, maybe 4 are of her with a (virtual) mouthfull.

Note:  If this is any help, our dear CM is a slender 5'3" and has a sensational top; KK is a slender 5'3" and has a sensational bottom, thank you very much.

Thanx to "adlion" for posting this thread, and please, y'all, share any update news here . . . that is, before the scheduled Release Date of Feb. 28th.

It's Monday 2/12/07, 4:30 PM here in SoCal and the latest "leak" is 'way overdue.  C'mon, "leakers" ~ get with the program, dammit!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 12, 2007, 04:35:37 PM
Whatever you may think of the (female) company that Miss Kim keeps, you have to give it up for Ray J (Brandy's li'l bro) who was able to hit that....because that is one cute gal.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: hangin2low on February 12, 2007, 05:02:01 PM
Quote:

Whatever you may think of the (female) company that Miss Kim keeps, you have to give it up for Ray J (Brandy's li'l bro) who was able to hit that....because that is one cute gal.




Mmmmmm mmmmm . . .

Wikipedia sez that she cops to augmentation/alteration of breasts, lips and nose.  But save your money, Kimberly dear, no need to augment the gluteus maximus.  I think she even surpasses JLo in the Ass Dept., if that's possible.  Have you seen her (topless) in the Christopher Brian fashion jeans ad campaign?  Now that's what I'M talkin' 'bout!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: colt13 on June 28, 2007, 12:09:03 AM
Does anybody know what her measurements are? She is new to me, and the tabloids are talking about butt implants. She has one of the more interesting hourglass shapes i have seen.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Vorlon on June 28, 2007, 01:55:49 AM
Quote:

Does anybody know what her measurements are? She is new to me, and the tabloids are talking about butt implants. She has one of the more interesting hourglass shapes i have seen.




There's a reason why she's called Kim KardASSian.
Well, it's possible that she has butt implants - Coco (Ice-T's wife) is sporting a nice pair of butt implants too.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Psf_79 on June 28, 2007, 04:19:18 AM
Some before & after comparisons here :
http://www.mediatakeout.com/6833/exclusive_proof_kim_k_got_her_booty_enhanced.html

Amazing
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ImplantsOnly on June 28, 2007, 04:49:13 AM
Nice pics PSF, but sorry to have to disagree with you.

When will people learn that - BUTT IMPLANTS DO NOT MAKE BIG BUTTS!  At-least, not by our standards.  Kim has latin roots and gained weight/muscle (in the right places) as she's aged/matured. Plus, those pics are overly-flattering.

Coco does NOT have butt implants.
Kim Kardashian does NOT have butt implants.

Sabrina Sabrok DOES have butt implants. I'm sure she got the biggest out there, and she ALREADY had a very nice butt, gaining only a moderate increase (again, by OUR standards).  But she still doesn't have a giant butt by any stretch.


Quote:

Some before & after comparisons here :
http://www.mediatakeout.com/6833/exclusive_proof_kim_k_got_her_booty_enhanced.html

Amazing


Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Vorlon on June 28, 2007, 06:35:20 AM
Strange how Coco's butt looks perfectly normal in one of her earlier modeling photos, and then BOOM - she has a super big booty that puts Vida Guerra to shame.

Yeah, I'm sure it was just a mirculous growth spurt in her 20ies.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: cynic on June 28, 2007, 08:29:36 AM
Quote:

BUTT IMPLANTS DO NOT MAKE BIG BUTTS!


Ummm, are you sure that is true all of the time?  Exhibit A, your honor:
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ooze3d on June 28, 2007, 08:58:31 AM
I'm not a butt implant expert... But that sure looks FAKE!!

God! It almost looks like high projection breast implants!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Tiffany on June 28, 2007, 10:37:35 AM
I LOVE big butts, almost as I love big breasts! Kim & Coco's asses look great. Fake or not. I have a **27** crush on Coco

Just a note : Implants aren't the only way to get a big booty, microfat grafting is another way to achieve a bigger ass without implants. But from what I understand it only works if you have some extra fat to begin with. So not fat = implants, Extra fat = grafting?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: 3deroticer on June 28, 2007, 11:59:38 AM
I had no idea that there were even butt implant to begin with. Is there ever a concern for leakage when you sit on them?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Tiffany on June 28, 2007, 02:09:21 PM
Not that I am aware of. The material is a lot stronger than those of a breast implant. They are made out of an elastomer, so they can't leak. I've read on some plastic surgery forums that they supposedly "outlive the owner", which would be good because from my understanding removing them is much harder than inserting them!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MasterDragonfly on June 28, 2007, 05:21:33 PM
Yes, fat grafting for buttock augmentation does require there to be a donor site with adequate fat.  If the person is naturally lean, this probably wouldn't be an option for them.

But for anyone else, the patient can get one, the other, or both.

Here's a surgeon who does it all:

http://www.betterbuttocks.com/

As for the material, it's just a solid silicone implant.  As far as I know, breast implants are the only implants to be filled with either saline or liquid/gel silicone.  And 'solid' doesn't translate to "hard as a rock".

Master "Dr Roberts would appear to have done some stellar work " Dragonfly
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: 3deroticer on June 28, 2007, 08:51:44 PM
Wow, the only guy who makes an ass and get paid well for it!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AlexHollywood on July 02, 2007, 01:10:18 AM
kim kardashian i remember her having a sex tape with some hip-hop artist
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 02, 2007, 02:55:25 PM
Yes, she made a sex tape with Ray J, Brandy Norwood's little brother She is the daughter of one of the lawyers who defended O.J. Simpson, and has a pretty good career as a stylist. Also, of all the celebutantes out there, skanky sex tape or no, she is the only one I would do, since she is hotttt
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 02, 2007, 03:00:07 PM
If you do the right amount of exercise and eat right, practically any woman can get a J-Lo or better booty. Would that more women took that route than go to the surgeon. (Yes, yes, I know, I'm contradicting myself, since I have no real problem with artificially-enhanced breasts, though I prefer naturals...but I'm crazy that way I guess.)
Quote:

I LOVE big butts, almost as I love big breasts! Kim & Coco's asses look great. Fake or not. I have a **27** crush on Coco


I agree. Coco's butt is insane, and I'm insanely jealous that Ice-T gets to tap that on the regular.

-- TheZookie "It's true what they say: don't hate the playa, hate the game " 007
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: jamma on July 03, 2007, 10:47:40 AM
My contribution.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: greenmartian on July 03, 2007, 12:15:42 PM
Oh Jamma...

If you got any more photos from this "event"...please post!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: par on July 03, 2007, 01:43:08 PM
Quote:

My contribution.




Thanks..

BTW love your avatar..... she's my fav!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Vorlon on July 03, 2007, 02:38:21 PM
Quote:

My contribution.




She's an airhead just like her girlfriend Paris Hilton, but unlike Paris, she has some fine curves.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 03, 2007, 04:23:18 PM
Quote:

She's an airhead just like her girlfriend Paris Hilton, but unlike Paris, she has some fine curves.


And she is much more beautiful than Paris, too.

I'd still hit it
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: jamma on July 04, 2007, 10:26:44 AM
Quote:

Oh Jamma...

If you got any more photos from this "event"...please post!




http://thesuperficial.com/2007/06/kim_kardashian_is_a_ridiculous.php
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Vorlon on July 12, 2007, 05:11:32 PM
Yet another booty shot from Kim KardASSian.

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: milom on July 12, 2007, 05:51:47 PM
FUCK!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: greenmartian on July 12, 2007, 07:33:15 PM
thank you Vorlon, muchly!!!  If you have any more from this, please post them also!  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: jamma on July 12, 2007, 10:05:50 PM
Here is the set of those pictures.

http://thesuperficial.com/2007/07/kim_kardashian_for_no_reason.php
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on July 13, 2007, 01:25:49 AM
This girl has some lethal curves! Awesome!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Psf_79 on July 13, 2007, 02:35:10 AM
Quote:

Nice pics PSF, but sorry to have to disagree with you.

When will people learn that - BUTT IMPLANTS DO NOT MAKE BIG BUTTS!  At-least, not by our standards.  Kim has latin roots and gained weight/muscle (in the right places) as she's aged/matured. Plus, those pics are overly-flattering.




Who knows? And with a butt like Kim's, I don't care whether it's fake or not She's actually of Armenian descent, from her father's side if my memory serves me right.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Vorlon on July 13, 2007, 04:22:36 AM
Quote:

Quote:

Nice pics PSF, but sorry to have to disagree with you.

When will people learn that - BUTT IMPLANTS DO NOT MAKE BIG BUTTS!  At-least, not by our standards.  Kim has latin roots and gained weight/muscle (in the right places) as she's aged/matured. Plus, those pics are overly-flattering.




Who knows? And with a butt like Kim's, I don't care whether it's fake or not She's actually of Armenian descent, from her father's side if my memory serves me right.




She definitely looks healthier than those other Cardassians in her homeland...



Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TripleB on July 13, 2007, 04:45:04 AM
That's the second Cardassian joke I've seen on this site.  Only Dukat can so adequately represent.  Off topic, one of the actresses who played his daughter on the series had a decent rack.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Vorlon on July 13, 2007, 05:18:35 AM
Quote:

That's the second Cardassian joke I've seen on this site.  Only Dukat can so adequately represent.  Off topic, one of the actresses who played his daughter on the series had a decent rack.




You are probably referring to Melanie Smith.

But the most memorable boob girl on that show was imo Chase Masterson:

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on July 13, 2007, 10:31:55 AM
 Oooh... nice! I've never watched that show so she's new to me. The short hair and curvy body are great! Thanks!  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Vorlon on July 13, 2007, 10:41:56 AM
Quote:

 Oooh... nice! I've never watched that show so she's new to me. The short hair and curvy body are great! Thanks!  




You should, they've got plenty of busty guest stars there.

One of the most memorable scenes in that department is probably the nipple scene in the pilot of Star Trek: Enterprise.



What's even funnier is that the male actor in this scene had a major hard-on, and they didn't care enough to edit that out.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on July 13, 2007, 11:04:52 AM
 I did watch Enterprise when it was on... are you referring to the decon chamber stuff with the tank tops and 'decon gel'? I watched that show mostly for Jolene Blalock, who consistenly looks SO good walking away from camera. I do catch some misc. broadcast SF shows when possible (out of nostalgia for my youth mostly, along with the fact I enjoy the fanservice bits they put in now and again). SG1, SGA, and Farscape all have some entertainment value, and all also have some easy-on-the-eyes female talent too, albeit none of Scoresque proportions. Though fairly petite up top and all over, lately I've been admiring Gigi Edgely on Farscape... they way the makeup folks apply that monochrome shading to her collarbones and cleavage is quite appealing.  
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 13, 2007, 12:14:50 PM
Talk about living long and prospering.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Vorlon on July 13, 2007, 01:47:36 PM
Quote:

Talk about living long and prospering.




Well, since DS9 had no busty eyecatcher in the main cast - other than Voyager and Enterprise - they had to make up with plenty of busty guest characters.

Another busty guest character in DS9 (though the angle in that picture is not that good):

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on July 13, 2007, 03:39:54 PM
Quote:

Quote:

Talk about living long and prospering.




Well, since DS9 had no busty eyecatcher in the main cast - other than Voyager and Enterprise - they had to make up with plenty of busty guest characters.




Major Kira was not necessarily busty, but she certainly engaged my full forward thrusters.
 

Jimbo "somethin's cookin' on bajor" bob
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: 3deroticer on July 13, 2007, 07:43:02 PM
Major Kira went on to be a bad guy in "the Dark Angel" first season series, and man what a bitch she was!

She must of had fun playing that character.
Usually the bitchiest character on TV, are in real life are nothing but a sweetheart. They have nothing to be ashame of in life, when playing a bad guy.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Vorlon on July 14, 2007, 03:27:01 AM
Quote:

Major Kira went on to be a bad guy in "the Dark Angel" first season series, and man what a bitch she was!

She must of had fun playing that character.
Usually the bitchiest character on TV, are in real life are nothing but a sweetheart. They have nothing to be ashame of in life, when playing a bad guy.




I always liked her mirror universe alter ego, where she was a seductive femme fatale.
Though I have to say she looked much better with longer hair - more feminine.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DruulEmpire on July 14, 2007, 04:05:21 AM
With all due respect to Kim, I'm so glad this has near-inevitably become a Star Trek discussion.

"Our Man Bashir" is definitely a go-to episode of DS9.  Not only is it an inspired riff on James Bond, but it's where you find Vorlon's picture (that's Marci Brickhouse -- !!! -- as "Mona Luvsitt," I guess sort of a Matt Helm tribute) and also Kira (man, she always got my thrusters going too) as a slinky sexy Russian spy.  Terry Farrell as Dr. Honey Baer wasn't bad either.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TripleB on July 14, 2007, 05:57:55 AM
Star Trek related breast content is apparently more interesting than Kim, if only related on a homonymic level.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on July 14, 2007, 08:11:57 AM
Quote:

Star Trek related breast content is apparently more interesting than Kim, if only related on a homonymic level.




If only we could combine the two. . .
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: lovefakeboobs on December 28, 2007, 05:43:17 PM
Maybe I am a little out of touch does kim kardashian have a boob job.
She is very pretty dark skinned woman with a lot of curves to her. Her site said she about 27 so everything should start to be falling south in 10 years.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on December 28, 2007, 05:51:08 PM
i always just assumed she did since all of the gossip sites where you can get the best pics of her and her big ass have always stated pretty plainly that her boobs are fake.

regardless IMO she is hot as hell body and face put her as close to a 10 as id wager anyone deserves....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: lovefakeboobs on December 28, 2007, 05:58:31 PM
she is very pretty. she is hot with or with implants, I am sure when she has [censored] she will have to work hard to get that ass back to form
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Inherency on December 28, 2007, 07:17:44 PM
There are some bikini candids out there that make her look natural.  Unfortunately the sex video isn't revealing enough to say one way or the other.

If they are implants, then they are very small and probably under the muscle.  I really doubt it though.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on December 28, 2007, 09:01:47 PM
 Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it mainstream-common knowledge that KK has ass-cheek implants? I'm fairly certain I've heard mention of it quite a few times on tv. As for her rack, I have no idea. Personally, I find her totally without appeal in any and every respect, regardless of what she may look like. Just goes to prove that as is oft-rumored, personality DOES count for something.  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: USER_2758_NOT_FOUND on December 28, 2007, 10:25:06 PM
Quote:

Palomine said:
 Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it mainstream-common knowledge that KK has ass-cheek implants? I'm fairly certain I've heard mention of it quite a few times on tv. As for her rack, I have no idea. Personally, I find her totally without appeal in any and every respect, regardless of what she may look like. Just goes to prove that as is oft-rumored, personality DOES count for something.  




I've seen the ass-implant thing in the tabloids and such, but I take that with a grain of salt.
Regardless, her curves are glorious, whether they be god-given or not
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on December 28, 2007, 11:39:15 PM
I'd be more likely to believe that she had some padding or something than ass implants. She's one of my favorite mainstream girls. Her curves are insane, real or not. In my opinion she's all natural, and just carries extra weight well.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on December 29, 2007, 01:20:17 AM
::Approaches podium::



::tap tap::









Kim Kardashian is my babymomma.













::Sits down::
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on December 29, 2007, 02:13:17 AM
You be a lucky man.
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MasterDragonfly on December 30, 2007, 11:50:35 AM
She's kinda got the DSL thing going on, too.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: g0ddmode on December 30, 2007, 12:19:02 PM
Quote:

Palomine said:
 Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it mainstream-common knowledge that KK has ass-cheek implants? I'm fairly certain I've heard mention of it quite a few times on tv. As for her rack, I have no idea. Personally, I find her totally without appeal in any and every respect, regardless of what she may look like. Just goes to prove that as is oft-rumored, personality DOES count for something.  




I think it is just speculation, otherwise not proven.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 30, 2007, 03:25:05 PM
Both Kim Kardashian and Angel Melaku have been accused (online tabloids especially) of having butt implants, but it is unproven, and I rather disbelieve it in both instances (esp. Angel's). For KING Magazine to agree to put KK on their cover, making her the first white woman to achieve the feat, should tell you something about the power of a callipygian figure.

-- TheZookie "Never trust a big butt and a smile " 007
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: turbo on January 11, 2008, 03:27:21 AM
Here's an even better view of Kim's caboose!

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on January 11, 2008, 05:21:51 AM
Saw that today and immediately found myself a few ounces lighter.  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on January 11, 2008, 07:14:46 AM
I know she catches a lot of flak for her scandalous past, and being famous for, some may say, absolutely nothing. But there is not a doubt, at least in my mind that she is a stunning, head-turning beauty. As far as her breasts, I think they have been augmented, but her booty I believe is the real deal. Agree or disagree?

 [image][/image]
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 11, 2008, 12:43:08 PM
Quote:

chorizo said:
I know she catches a lot of flak for her scandalous past, and being famous for, some may say, absolutely nothing. But there is not a doubt, at least in my mind that she is a stunning, head-turning beauty. As far as her breasts, I think they have been augmented, but her booty I believe is the real deal. Agree or disagree?


I agree.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on January 11, 2008, 12:44:30 PM
i think she's totally hot.  and mabye im missing something up here in canada, but im still waiting to see exactly what's supposed to be so wrong with her personality.  

she doesnt play the nasty/aloof character so many of her "famous for no real reason" peers do, at least not from what ive seen.

regardless, im gonna be pulling to anyone with a waist to ass ratio like that.....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Adman on January 11, 2008, 12:52:03 PM
Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
Both Kim Kardashian and Angel Melaku have been accused (online tabloids especially) of having butt implants, but it is unproven, and I rather disbelieve it in both instances (esp. Angel's). For KING Magazine to agree to put KK on their cover, making her the first white woman to achieve the feat, should tell you something about the power of a callipygian figure.

-- TheZookie "Never trust a big butt and a smile " 007




Kim's butt is real.  I've met her, my wife knows her a little bit because she high level at E! (celebs or pseudo-celebs go through there all day).  It's nice, it's big, but it's nothing outrageous, just a normal good butt.  She'd got the butt, the hips, the thighs...it's just a good package, she didn't have butt, hips, and thighs implants.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on January 11, 2008, 01:27:54 PM
Quote:

Adman said:It's nice, it's big, but it's nothing outrageous, just a normal good butt.




I'd say it's a lot more than just that, but I also think it's real. Though I don't care how fake it might be if it looks like that.

And Zookie, wasn't Jenna von Oy on King's cover?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 11, 2008, 01:42:20 PM
Quote:

Goldeneye said:
I'd say it's a lot more than just that, but I also think it's real....

And Zookie, wasn't Jenna von Oy on King's cover?


I know she was in a spread for the magazine but I don't know if she was on the cover. I am looking through their site to see one way or the other, but I know for sure that Kim was on their cover -- they made a helluva big deal out of it, for good reason ("check out this white girl with a black girl's ass!").
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: lovefakeboobs on January 11, 2008, 01:45:55 PM
I know what you mean but no real women looks like that. I am sure she is pretty and a great body. But I do not think she really looks like that pic you posted. Her skin is photoshoped and air brushed
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 11, 2008, 01:51:48 PM
Here's one of the shots from the KING photoshoot of Kim, and in comparison, this is Jenna van Oy in MAXIM, I believe:

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AZWolf on January 12, 2008, 06:15:45 AM
Worthless idiots......but I want more from a series than idiots looking good.  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 16, 2008, 12:37:14 PM
Quote:


"Ass a Matter of Fact: Man Ogles Kim Kardashian"
Posted at January 11th, 2008 7:50 am by mischalova

It’s been awhile since we had a good ogle. Fortunately, the following incident is far less creepy than the time Ashton Kutcher drooled over step daughter Rumer Willis.

As Kim Kardashian went for a stroll in Beverly Hills yesterday, at least one onlooker was impressed with what he saw. Then again, considering the size of Kardashian’s backside, he may have simply been overwhelmed.

Where else was the guy to look?


Pssst, dude: if you pick up a copy of Playboy, you can actually see Kim Kardashian naked! Then you can really do some ogling!

Later on, this same guy was seen drooling over his computer when viewing the Tiffany Pollard sex tape.



Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on January 24, 2008, 08:56:11 PM
This set of photos has me mesmerized. I still can't get over her curves. Fantastic!

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 06, 2008, 01:14:33 PM
There is really something about her look that is so interesting...she's like this smoldering sexy exotic little thing. Can't say so much about her (alleged) personality or her taste in men, though.

Three more links for you:

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on February 06, 2008, 01:40:19 PM
I have been a big fan of kim since the sex tape. If your still not sure about her check out the 0:47 mark until then end of the clip.  Kim K Youtube Clip
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 06, 2008, 01:57:42 PM
Shee-it!

"I do...I do work out...it's all about the lunges and squats..."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TF22 on February 06, 2008, 04:42:56 PM
I love it when girls adjust their chests...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on February 07, 2008, 02:39:15 AM
I never get tired of looking at Kim ,nude,in her adult vid,or on that E show
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on February 21, 2008, 09:19:52 AM
Bump... and I do mean bump!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on February 21, 2008, 09:26:29 AM
lord is this girl ever a specimen.  she chould have no tits or ass and still be pretty.  but there she is as is *sigh*

as near a 10 as it gets....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: 3deroticer on February 21, 2008, 09:43:09 AM
kind of remind me of Jasmine in one of Disney's character.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on February 21, 2008, 11:16:30 AM
Quote:

3deroticer said:
kind of remind me of Jasmine in one of Disney's character.




Interesting, I'd never made that connection before, but I can definitely see the resemblance, particularly in that picture.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GALVATRON on February 21, 2008, 02:16:43 PM
bwaaaahhh!

No fair! I always make the Kim K./Jasmine connection.
I want full credit for making you see that resemblance!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on February 21, 2008, 03:31:19 PM
I, Jimbobob, being of unsound mind and agile body, hereby present Lord Galvatron (bwaaaahhh!) with official credit for the Kim K./Jasmine connection and all responsibilities herein.

Here here.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: 3deroticer on February 21, 2008, 04:02:48 PM
Be careful Galvatron, I'll send someone to chop off your sick twisted head.

Oops, did I say that?

one question how does one go from chopping off a woman head to family safe Disney character? LOL
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 07, 2008, 03:48:26 PM
Ahem! Moving right along...

A site has come to my attention that regularly features pictures, interviews and gossip about our Miss K: Bossip is its name, and it is hilarious.



More such pictures and links to check out at the site include:
She & he are regulars on the site's "Daily Swirl" page
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mxn36 on March 07, 2008, 04:21:16 PM
The ass-implant thing could stem from this photo:

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 07, 2008, 04:55:15 PM
Ooooh -- work that booty, baby!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on March 07, 2008, 07:29:36 PM
That's one of my favorite pictures of her!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on March 07, 2008, 08:19:10 PM
Those bikini pictures (among others) pretty much show that the girl doesn't have ass implants. I personally never thought she did, she just appears to accumulate padding in the right places.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 08, 2008, 11:17:19 AM
I concur. I don't know why people do not believe it is possible to be that callipygian naturally
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Bulbus on March 08, 2008, 03:10:38 PM
Had to google the word 'callipygian'

...Glad I did  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on March 08, 2008, 05:23:47 PM
I think people believe that if you're a person of star status and your body looks good that you've obviously gone under the knife. Couple this with Hollywood's version of "ZOMFG!! Her titties, boobs, breasts, butt, ass, booty is so big, huge, giant, enormous" or whatever and anyone with a nice healthy homegrown shape is fake. I went onto IMDB.com and went to the CSI page and they actually had people on there talking about how their girlfriends thought Jessica Lucas a.k.a (Ronnie Lake on the show) has huge fake boobs. I'm afraid people have forgotten.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on March 08, 2008, 07:32:54 PM
Quote:

mxn36 said:
The ass-implant thing could stem from this photo:

 




one of my favorite pics ever.  

is she ever a specimen....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on March 10, 2008, 03:48:32 AM
And still looks great without makeup, I finally noted once I was able to drag my eyes northward.

From this TVGuide.com interview:

Quote:

TV Guide: Are you surprised by how much attention your butt gets?
Kardashian: Seriously, it's insane! Have people not seen Armenian women before? And then the rumors that it's fake? Who gets butt implants?! Just [recently] in a magazine, they said that I had my nose, lips, cheeks and boobs done. Watch me take my bra off and you'll know I haven't had my boobs done! [Laughs]


Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solo89 on March 10, 2008, 04:48:34 AM
Quote:

Goldeneye said:
And still looks great without makeup, I finally noted once I was able to drag my eyes northward.

From this TVGuide.com interview:

Quote:

TV Guide: Are you surprised by how much attention your butt gets?
Kardashian: Seriously, it's insane! Have people not seen Armenian women before? And then the rumors that it's fake? Who gets butt implants?! Just [recently] in a magazine, they said that I had my nose, lips, cheeks and boobs done. Watch me take my bra off and you'll know I haven't had my boobs done! [Laughs]







Just tell us all when and where and we'll be there.  Or maybe she should film it and put it up online!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on March 10, 2008, 05:27:58 AM
I think she already did LOL.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 15, 2008, 12:31:01 AM
She is absolutely right when she says that Armenian women have junk in the trunk. Cher is part-Armenian, isn't she, and although she is generally skinny, her butt is not

A month old, but I know you'll all appreciate this link:

**29** Crunch: "Kim and the Girls Wave Hello"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 17, 2008, 01:04:33 AM
Quote:

PopCrunch: "Paris Hilton Kim Kardashian Butt Diss: 'Cottage Cheese Inside A Big Trash Bag'"

Paris Hilton is backtracking comments she made about ex-BFF Kim Kardashian's signature badunkadunk on a Las Vegas radio on April 14th.

"I would not want [Kim's butt] - it's gross! It reminds me of cottage cheese inside a big trash bag," the petite Paris retorted during a call-in appearance in Sin City.

Paris now claims "She was only joking," telling In Touch Weekly:

"I was just joking around and I made a stupid joke. I felt really bad afterward, so I contacted Kim and apologized. It was a silly thing to say. Kim's hot!"

Kim accepts Paris' apology: "Paris and I have been friends since we were [censored] and I'm glad she made the effort to say she’s sorry."


What can I say. Paris Hilton is a flat-bootied twat, and an idiot to boot. And she apologised cos she knows that KK could kick what little butt she has into next week.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: USER_2758_NOT_FOUND on April 17, 2008, 12:10:44 PM
In addition to this great photo, read the last half of the article.
Thank you God for ignoring her prayers!

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 18, 2008, 12:20:52 AM
God, I love that girl...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Hothitter on April 28, 2008, 08:02:47 PM
Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
God, I love that girl...




Me too.  I think Kim handles the whole thing perfectly.  She's impossibly gorgeous and has tremendous fun with it. Always smiling, never a nasty look for anyone. She started out as Paris' pal, and now Paris can only play in Kim's shadow.  I even like her show.  She just rocks.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 28, 2008, 11:34:33 PM
Forget the jailbird next to her and concentrate on KK:

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: HeavensNight on April 29, 2008, 09:32:11 AM
I love it when Joe McHale ("The Soup") slams her for having a big ass, a sex tape, and dead behind the eyes sisters.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 04, 2008, 08:34:34 PM
Who cares about the sisters and the sex tape, when you can concentrate on the big ass?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ROUNDandHEAVY on July 04, 2008, 09:01:51 PM
O
M
F
G
!

So where are these pics wearing only pearls available that she was taking? And why wasn't i told she was flashing her HUGE BUTT CRACK on national TV????

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 04, 2008, 09:13:31 PM
Don't blame me, I only found out about it this very minute
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mercerwatch on July 04, 2008, 09:47:55 PM
Here...

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on July 04, 2008, 10:26:41 PM
Reggie Bush = Lucky Bastard

I actually like watching her show too and I saw the episode when she made the calendar for Reggie, I had to pick my jaw up off the floor and toss it over my shoulder
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 04, 2008, 11:52:27 PM
Quote:

Reggie Bush = Lucky Bastard


You got that right! But I wonder why she didn't just tie her hair in a scarf in that picture, with her hair windswept like that in two "horns"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on July 05, 2008, 12:17:16 AM
Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
Both Kim Kardashian and Angel Melaku have been accused (online tabloids especially) of having butt implants, but it is unproven, and I rather disbelieve it in both instances (esp. Angel's). For KING Magazine to agree to put KK on their cover, making her the first white woman to achieve the feat, should tell you something about the power of a callipygian figure.



I love Fake Booties & as far as i know, both got Fake Booties, no buttocks implants but injections, Ninel Conde got them too.
 
BTW, Angel "Lola Luv" & Pebbelz "The Model" got a lot of cc's injected but Ninel Conde is not that far from them.





see yaa... =)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 05, 2008, 03:43:51 AM
Quote:

gabyybag said:
Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
Both Kim Kardashian and Angel Melaku have been accused (online tabloids especially) of having butt implants, but it is unproven, and I rather disbelieve it in both instances (esp. Angel's). For KING Magazine to agree to put KK on their cover, making her the first white woman to achieve the feat, should tell you something about the power of a callipygian figure.



I love Fake Booties & as far as i know, both got Fake Booties, no buttocks implants but injections, Ninel Conde got them too.
 
BTW, Angel "Lola Luv" & Pebbelz "The Model" got a lot of cc's injected but Ninel Conde is not that far from them.


I still say that the accusation of butt implants and/or injections, or whatever, leveled against KK & Angel are yet to be proven.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on July 05, 2008, 08:44:01 AM
the people who so vehemently claim kim has a fake ass are the same crowd of laymens you can find find leaving newgroup comments claiming well known natural tit models "can't be real"

the sum of their evidence is looking at a picture and saying "there's no way"....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on July 05, 2008, 09:45:49 AM
Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
I still say that the accusation of butt implants and/or injections, or whatever, leveled against KK & Angel are yet to be proven.



Ok.  


see yaa... =)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on July 05, 2008, 10:15:16 AM
Quote:

Real said:
the people who so vehemently claim kim has a fake ass are the same crowd of lamens you can find find leaving newgroup comments claiming well known natural tit models "can't be real"

the sum of their evidence is looking at a picture and saying "there's no way"....



Lot of them don't like Fake Booties and/or Fake Boobies.  



see yaa... =)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on July 05, 2008, 01:46:20 PM
The surgery for butt implants leaves a huge scar near the crease where the butt meets the leg. She's shown her butt enough on live camera to show that there are no scars. She just has marvelous genetics.

To me she's the whole package. Gorgeous face, silky hair, intelligence, and luscious curves. She's in the same league as Victoria Zdrock.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on July 05, 2008, 02:25:38 PM
Quote:

mastert said:
The surgery for butt implants leaves a huge scar near the crease where the butt meets the leg. She's shown her butt enough on live camera to show that there are no scars. She just has marvelous genetics.



Buttock Augmentation with Implants

Incision Location: Once the implant has been selected the next task is to decide the type of incision to be used.The incision can be placed in several locations:
 
· Superiorly on both sides of the upper buttock - Although the scars can be hidden in your undergarment or bikini, it is not recommended since the scar can be quite visible when not wearing clothing, and it requires two incisions.

· Inferiorly in both of the gluteal creases where the "cheek" meets the back of the thigh. This choice will leave you with two scars that also can be visible.

· One incision, which is, placed down the center of the sacrum - a small 4-6 cm vertical incision down the buttocks crease. This incision extremely well hidden and this approach only involves one scar. The only drawback is that it may have a higher infection rate than the other incisions. However, if this happens it is usually solved with antibiotics and wound care. If you choose this incision site you must be willing to follow your surgeons recommendations and at the first hint of infection contact your surgeon immediately.


There's also Buttock Augmentation with Fat grafting technique & this new (non-legal in most countries) butt injections, almost no scars at all.  

I love Kim Kardashian Booty & i don't think that she got implants, just injections or the "Fat grafting".  

Also, i've seen lots of pics & videos of butt implants (Sabrina Sabrok, Sheyla Hershey aka Sheyla Almeida, Alayah Sashu, Sabrina Boing Boing, Heidi Mayne, Andrea Rincon aka Selena Spice, Kaory Summer, "La Gitana", etc) & can't see the huge scars, guess they went the "One incision" route.

Buttock Augmentation Source:
http://www.surgicalservicesinternational.com/buttocks_enhancement.htm

Fake Booties & Fake Boobies Rule!!!



see yaa... =)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: turbo on July 15, 2008, 10:28:09 PM
As paparazzi-savvy as Kim claims to be - I just find it amazing that she allowed herself to be snapped in this position!
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 15, 2008, 11:05:45 PM
And what's wrong with that pose? I'd rather see KK's booty than see Britney Spears' va-jay-jay sprawled all over the place.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: nards2 on July 16, 2008, 05:25:05 AM
Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
Quote:

gabyybag said:
Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
Both Kim Kardashian and Angel Melaku have been accused (online tabloids especially) of having butt implants, but it is unproven, and I rather disbelieve it in both instances (esp. Angel's). For KING Magazine to agree to put KK on their cover, making her the first white woman to achieve the feat, should tell you something about the power of a callipygian figure.



I love Fake Booties & as far as i know, both got Fake Booties, no buttocks implants but injections, Ninel Conde got them too.
 
BTW, Angel "Lola Luv" & Pebbelz "The Model" got a lot of cc's injected but Ninel Conde is not that far from them.


I still say that the accusation of butt implants and/or injections, or whatever, leveled against KK & Angel are yet to be proven.



I'd love to give her a few injections in her backside!!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ROUNDandHEAVY on July 16, 2008, 08:41:31 AM
I knew a lot of Greek girls when I was growing up, they worked at their dad's diner, and I watched in fascination as their butts and boobs swelled up during HS. They just seemed to poimt staraight bach and up in defiance of gravity: plump heartshaped and wonderous to behold.

You gotta understand the ethinicity of that area of the Mediterranean, it's quite likely that Kim has a very nice naturally protruding butt thanks to her DNA.

It has that natural look, unlike some of the obviously injected butts posted earlier.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on July 16, 2008, 09:32:03 PM
Ok.  



see yaa... =)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Brahma on July 17, 2008, 12:49:43 AM
Small correction--she's Armenian, not Greek.  Same general area of the world, but a couple hundred miles to the east.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ROUNDandHEAVY on July 17, 2008, 06:05:20 AM
I knew that but was implying that armenians and greeks share a lot of DNA.

Bob "I wouldn't mind sharing some DNA with Kim" HHH
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: bignatslover on July 18, 2008, 09:31:00 AM
She was smokin' hot on the Kimmel show.  She almost looks otherworldly.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on July 24, 2008, 03:19:58 PM
Quote:

bignatslover said:
She was smokin' hot on the Kimmel show.  She almost looks otherworldly.




Speaking of otherworldly...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 24, 2008, 03:50:13 PM
Fuckin' hell! That's an ass!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on July 24, 2008, 06:27:59 PM
Oooh! Oooh! My turn!

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 24, 2008, 06:38:21 PM
OK, that one looks like she's wearing a false bottom but it also proves why Shana Moakler is so jealous of KK.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 24, 2008, 07:35:36 PM
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Djoser on July 24, 2008, 07:44:10 PM
She's an angel of pure beauty
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: hangin2low on July 25, 2008, 05:21:13 PM
Quote:

Djoser said:
She's an angel of pure beauty




. . . with a big fuggin ass!!!

[sorry, to your poetic post, i just had to add a bit of crudeness for balance]
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ltfields on July 27, 2008, 08:00:09 AM
Quote:

hangin2low said:
Quote:

Djoser said:
She's an angel of pure beauty




. . . with a big fuggin ass!!!

[sorry, to your poetic post, i just had to add a bit of crudeness for balance]




Stay classy BEA...  

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: berkovw on July 27, 2008, 08:06:39 AM
Quote:

ltfields said:
Quote:

hangin2low said:
Quote:

Djoser said:
She's an angel of pure beauty




. . . with a big fuggin ass!!!

[sorry, to your poetic post, i just had to add a bit of crudeness for balance]




Stay classy BEA...  

 




While I love Phil Hartman's Frank Sinatra ("Kick his ass, Steve!"  "Uncle Fester!"), if you're going to say, "Stay classy, BEA!", then you probably should have a picture of Ron Burgundy.

Like so:
 

"Stay classy, BEA!"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 31, 2008, 12:10:55 AM
Left to right: Serena Williams, Kim Kardashian, Common:

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: on July 31, 2008, 12:16:51 AM
Mmm...look at her big, luscious, beautiful.......lips
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: lovefakeboobs on July 31, 2008, 12:20:48 AM
I do not recall when I started this thread I am surprised to see it still live.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 31, 2008, 12:37:55 AM
It's all about Kim -- the bootiest girl in LA -- why shouldn't it remain alive?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DJPFC on July 31, 2008, 01:38:38 AM
Exactly.  Normally I cannot stomach reality shows, but Kim actually makes the show somewhat passable for me.  The rest of the sisters however... not so much.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on July 31, 2008, 02:09:21 AM
 


OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: berkovw on July 31, 2008, 08:59:30 AM
Quote:

lovefakeboobs said:
I do not recall when I started this thread I am surprised to see it still live.




I loathe "Princess Kim" (GAG!) and everything she stands for, but on the other hand, she is so smoking hot that I get over my revulsion.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: colt13 on July 31, 2008, 10:20:30 AM
I like the look of the guy's face in the background. Re. Kim in black pants.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 31, 2008, 05:01:44 PM
There should be a law that mandates that she can appear in public only wearing either skintight pants or bikinis. That ass is a national treasure on a par with Mount Rushmore or the Statue of Liberty

Here's a nice gallery of photos of our Kim, including this one:

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 31, 2008, 05:17:43 PM
Quote:

DJPFC said:
Exactly.  Normally I cannot stomach reality shows, but Kim actually makes the show somewhat passable for me.  The rest of the sisters however... not so much.


Her sisters look pretty creepy, and their oddly-spelled names don't help either. It's hard to fathom, what with her "famous for being famous" persona and airhead BFFs like Paris Hilton, but as strange as it is, KK seems to be the most normal member of that clan!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on July 31, 2008, 05:26:25 PM
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 31, 2008, 09:11:03 PM
I have this funny feeling that when she went to get her driver's licence at the DMV, her ID ended up with a picture of her ass instead, the way she tries her best to make sure that it's in every shot taken of her.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Glottis on July 31, 2008, 11:47:47 PM
Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
I have this funny feeling that when she went to get her driver's licence at the DMV, her ID ended up with a picture of her ass instead, the way she tries her best to make sure that it's in every shot taken of her.



I get the feeling that it's more the photographer's objective. I mean, really... if you saw her walking down the street, what would you aim for? If you were having her pose for a shoot that you were doing, what would you want her to show off?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 01, 2008, 03:03:19 AM
That's true, but you have to admit, even in candid photos, she tends to position herself so that her butt is sticking out. Not that it normally wouldn't stick out, considering how big and juicy it is, but...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on August 01, 2008, 02:07:25 PM
Because she knows it's what she's famous for, even though all she ever does is whine to the press about how it's not all that big and she gets so tired of people talking about it.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 02, 2008, 06:31:23 AM
Well, she is right about it not being all that big, and that there are many many women out there who have even more junk in the trunkk than she. The thing is, though, hers is not just big, it is supremely callipygian.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 03, 2008, 10:57:38 PM
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on August 04, 2008, 02:48:09 AM
I heard that somewhere a few days ago. Stoooooooooooooooooooked. Unless she's downright AWFUL, she's going pretty far.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 04, 2008, 03:17:03 AM
I don't vote for any TV reality show -- I've got better things to do with my cell phone -- but for our Kim I might make an exception
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on August 06, 2008, 04:01:27 AM
In a nice white tight shirt 8-4-08
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Bonecracker on August 06, 2008, 11:04:41 AM
Quote:

anakinsrise said:
In a nice white tight shirt 8-4-08


 Dear Anakin,
Thanks again,  She really is the complete package for a man like me.

Best regards,

Bone...

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: zero86 on August 06, 2008, 12:07:36 PM
She will be playing a role in the aptly named film, "Disaster Movie".  I think it was a mistake on her part, but you guys may enjoy the website for a few seconds.

http://www.disastermovie.net/

Scroll over her to make her chest expand.  I don't know if this means there'll be BE in the movie though, apparently they did the same thing on the websites of the last several garbage movies they made.

Anyways, it's Kim Kardashian related, so I figured I'd post it here.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Brahma on August 06, 2008, 11:48:51 PM
I like it.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 08, 2008, 07:09:36 AM
Appearing on Dancing With The Stars would be a much better move for her career-wise than ending up in the dead-end spoof film Disaster Movie (give it up already, guys, enough of this shit!). Even the Wayans Brothers don't do junk like this any more...and that's saying something.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on August 08, 2008, 11:09:27 AM
Let the drooling continue
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on August 08, 2008, 01:18:58 PM
At the beach yesterday right out of a James Bond movie
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 10, 2008, 12:12:00 AM
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on August 10, 2008, 01:19:15 AM
Turn around, Kim. TURN AROUND DAMN IT!!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 19, 2008, 06:03:41 PM
Quote:

robclassact said:
Turn around, Kim. TURN AROUND DAMN IT!!!


OK!



See:
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on August 20, 2008, 12:25:15 AM
W00T!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ChrisR1 on August 20, 2008, 07:31:38 AM
I find her extremely hot. I used to live in Glendale, CA, and there were tons of hot Armenian chicks that had a look similar to hers, and their racks were, collectively, abosolutely astounding.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on August 21, 2008, 04:30:38 AM
I don't think this one has been posted yet... God Damn!!!
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 27, 2008, 05:10:46 AM
Quote:

"Kim Kardashian to Appear on Dancing With the Stars Despite Foot Injury"

Kim Kardashian said Monday she will appear as a contestant on Dancing With the Stars this fall even though she checked into a New York City hospital on Sunday after cutting her foot on a glass table in her hotel room.

"I cut my foot pretty bad. ... It looked like a murder scene with all the blood everywhere," Kardashian, who co-stars with her family on the E! reality series Keeping Up With the Kardashians, said in a phone call to Good Morning America.

"I will be able to dance. I went to the hospital. I'll be fine," she added.

Following weeks of buzz and speculation, the official "Dancing" cast was announced Monday on ABC's Good Morning America.

The 13 **28** slated to compete on the new season of the top-rated dance contest, premiering Sept. 22, include Kardashian, Susan Lucci, Lance Bass, Brooke Burke, Cloris Leachman, Toni Braxton, chef Rocco DiSpirito, Cody Linley of Hannah Montana, comedian Jeffrey Ross, Ted McGinley, NFL champ Warren Sapp and two Olympic athletes: Misty May-Treanor, who won her second gold medal for beach volleyball at this year's summer games in Beijing, and Maurice Greene, who won two gold medals in track at the 2000 games in Sydney.


KK, Toni Braxton and Brooke Burke...should be interesting...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on September 15, 2008, 11:03:46 PM
Counting down the days till kim k shakes her booty on national tv...
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Adman on September 16, 2008, 02:34:29 AM
I want to bite that thing
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ayrton on September 16, 2008, 07:25:11 AM
I was watching the Italian Grand Prix on Sunday and during the pre-race grid walk the camera lingered on a super hot chick that I swear was Kim.   Did anyone else catch that?  Of course it could have been an Italian **29** that just looked like her.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Djoser on September 16, 2008, 12:08:18 PM
No pics of her?. It would put things in perspective   I mean to help us to realize if she was Kim or not.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on September 16, 2008, 11:38:58 PM
Can't get enough of her...
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 17, 2008, 12:37:00 PM
That ass is as close to perfect as any female's ass can be.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on September 19, 2008, 01:16:30 AM
New photo's of kim's ass looking extra huge!!! Check out the rest of the photo's  Here... I used to think her ass might be real but it looks like she is losing weight every where but her ass, thank goodness for that...
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: bignatslover on September 19, 2008, 08:39:27 AM
If I were a billionaire,
I would pay Kim to live with me
and let me eat sliced peaches out of her butt.

I love her ass that much.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on September 19, 2008, 10:36:52 AM
She's assstounding
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on September 19, 2008, 01:02:33 PM
Quote:

bignatslover said:
If I were a billionaire,
I would pay Kim to live with me
and let me eat sliced peaches out of her butt.

I love her ass that much.




HAHAHA!!! That's great...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on September 19, 2008, 01:46:08 PM
Quote:

bignatslover said:
If I were a billionaire,
I would pay Kim to live with me
and let me eat sliced peaches out of her butt.

I love her ass that much.




hear hear.

ive always imagined a banana split myself though...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on September 22, 2008, 04:52:47 PM
 
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: H_cups on September 22, 2008, 05:03:03 PM


Here I'm trying to get rid of mine and guys are drooling all over hers. *shrugs*

I'm gonna go put on some spandex and see if mine looks like that in them . I don't think I would be brave enough to go out in public though.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on September 22, 2008, 07:06:15 PM
Just wanted to add that she is going to be on "Dancing With The Stars" tonight. You all know what I'll be doing...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 23, 2008, 01:24:21 AM
Quote:

H_cups:
Here I'm trying to get rid of mine and guys are drooling all over hers. *shrugs*


What can I say? We like big well-shaped butts. *shrugs*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: colt13 on September 23, 2008, 10:31:26 AM
http://www.kimkardashian.com/2008/09/see-i-told-you.php

Unfortunately for us, Kim doesn't show off the boobs. But(or is that butt), she tries on some jeans for the backside lovers.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 24, 2008, 01:32:13 AM
Terrible camera work. Whoever shot that should be taken outside and shot and in any case, what was that video supposed to prove? (Since it was titled "See I told you so!") We all know that she has a big butt (and a nice one it is too), so I don't get it.

She was on "Tyra" recently, along with her two sisters -- when I can get a copy of it, I'll pass the link along.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on September 24, 2008, 02:09:01 AM
Good time to invest in the spandex market...
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 24, 2008, 09:19:05 AM
That picture makes her butt look so good, I feel like taking a bite outta of it. Grrrowwwlll!

Another reason why her ass seems so big is that she is on the shorter side. Her sister Khloe is 5' 10" and her other sister Kourtney is 4' 11 3/4" (but she insists she's five foot even ). KK herself can't be more than 5'4" at this rate, thus accentuating her curves. (Khloe is as bootylicious as KK by the way.)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Adman on September 24, 2008, 07:27:09 PM
Honestly, there are 2 trainers at Gold's Gym in Hawthorn, CA with bodies that are even leaner, and yet asses that are even rounder...swing by after 5pm and enjoy
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 25, 2008, 02:12:04 PM
I'd love to but I'm nowhere near the area...and I wouldn't advise that you sneak in a camera and try and take pictures of said asses since that would definitely get you into trouble

With all the talk of fake and real booties, I thought I should quote an interview that ESSENCE recently did with Niecy Nash of Reno 911! fame. You know we're always going on about the size of her butt in that uniform? Well...
Quote:

ESSENCE.COM: Your Reno 911! character Deputy Raineesha Williams is comfortable in her own skin and dons one-piece thongs on the red carpet. Do you still receive flack for attending that movie premiere in such a revealing bathing suit?

NASH: Raineesha would have worked the red carpet just like that. I think there was an issue with body imagery more from the White community and [bloggers] saying things like, “I can’t believe she did that! She looks horrible!” First of all, Raineesha’s lower half is prosthetic; they took a mold of my real booty and built it out. Frankly, I thought my fake butt looked cute, but I don’t think a lot of people know that it isn’t real. Now, had Pamela Anderson waltzed on the red carpet with her triple D’s with her tiny body in a bikini everyone would be saying she looked fabulous. Those sisters who didn’t know that I had a prosthetic booty were like, “Go on, girl, you rocked that booty!” I didn’t bother to tell them otherwise because I had so many say, “I embraced my body because of Raineesha!” And I thought to myself, If thinking that this is my real behind is going to make you feel like the queen you really are then get into it!

ESSENCE.COM: (Laughs) Well, Bell Biv DeVoe was warned that the fellas should “never trust a big butt and a smile.” As a voluptuous, beautiful sister how do you feel about the possibility of men taking such precautionary measures based on your shapeliness?

NASH: I created the look for Raineesha. She is built like every woman in my family—big booty and all—and I love it!  Baby, if I went to the mall with that behind on, I'd get my rent paid, okay!  There are so many men who love that particular shape and most of them are disappointed when they see me in person and discover that Raineesha has a prosthetic butt. That leads me to the answer to your question: Be sure to check out the big booty and the smile in person because the way the world is now, with the Internet and all its foolishness, you never know what you're getting. Like BBD said in their infamous song, that girl could be "poison," or better yet, it could be just too much for you to handle!  When you see it up close and personal, you'll be able to gauge better if the body, the mind and the spirit are all in the right place.  And if they’re not, you better run in the other direction!  


Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 06, 2008, 01:16:56 AM
I don't know if this shot has been seen here before, but well, any excuse to show KK's ass...

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on October 06, 2008, 09:02:21 AM
 


 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 07, 2008, 04:04:30 AM
I guess that morph had the desired effect, shara: Misty May Treanor has injured her Achilles tendon, and it looks like KK is coming back to Dancing With The Stars! WHOO-HOO!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 07, 2008, 05:49:50 AM
Quote:

Gutter Uncensored: "Kim Kardashian's Measurements are Amazing"

Kim Kardashian's Measurements are 35D-26-40....

Super-K was a guest on the WBLS radio program, the Wendy Williams Experience, Wendy Williams actually took kim's measurements. Wendy Williams had her lesbian intern who has a crush on kim do the measuring and she was 35 chest, 26 1/2 waist and 40 hips. Kim's cup size is a "D" so she is 35-D up top.

Damn 40" hips, thats all Ass. This chick's butt is Huge.





Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 23, 2008, 03:33:40 AM
Quote:

AskMen: "Kim Kardashian's breast prayer"

Kim Kardashian used to pray her breasts would stop growing.

The 27-year-old model and star of Keeping Up With the Kardashians was an early developer and had C-cup breasts by the time she was 11.

Kim revealed: "I would cry about it. I swear, I would say my prayers at night, hoping that I would stop developing."

The Hollywood socialite - who starred in a sex tape with Brandy's brother, R'n'B singer Ray J - has now learnt to "embrace" her body and made her mother proud by posing for Playboy magazine.

She said: "I've embraced it now. When my mom saw the Playboy pictures she said, 'Wow. If I had pictures from when I was your age. You should do this while you can. They might never ask you again.' "

Kim has decided to use her sexy curves to keep her in the public spotlight.

She added to Details magazine: "I'm not the sex kitten that they've made me out to be, but I'll kind of give it to them when I have to. I know that's what they want, and so I give it to them."


Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 23, 2008, 04:22:16 AM


More pictures here.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Djoser on December 23, 2008, 03:04:32 PM
Well i appreciate the pics so ty TheZookie007.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 17, 2009, 04:12:55 PM
My pleasure.



Or perhaps in KK's case I should say, "My pleASSure"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Djoser on January 17, 2009, 05:39:10 PM
  WOW!   what a nice view!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on January 18, 2009, 04:06:52 AM
That's from a promo that aired back in...damn, probably the summer or something? She's in some store trying on a pair of (I assume) low-rise jeans and she literally cannot pack her giant ass into them, and turns around to show the camera. It's the 3/4 profile shot that really bangs. Holy hell. I've never actually seen the full scene...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: datits on January 18, 2009, 05:44:38 PM
Yes i think i am developing an arse fetish staring at that photo i would love to see a clip of that
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: prometheus on January 18, 2009, 06:23:27 PM
She has an incredible figure!  I'm amazed every time I see a new photo.  Thanks to everyone who's posted in this thread!  Definitely one of my favorites!!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on January 19, 2009, 02:49:34 AM
Quote:

datits said:
Yes i think i am developing an arse fetish staring at that photo




...What took you so long?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 23, 2009, 05:13:21 AM



Jay-zus!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mxn36 on January 24, 2009, 04:00:35 PM
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on January 25, 2009, 06:30:20 AM
Ain't nuttin there.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Freddy on January 25, 2009, 02:38:30 PM
I love the junk in the trunk on this girl; I just wish more women could flaunt their curves like this.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 31, 2009, 09:29:07 AM
Agreed!

Quote:

Celebuzz: "Kim Kardashian: 'I'm Twice Jessica's Size'"

Kim Kardashian is still frustrated with critics of Jessica Simpson and the fuller figure she's been flaunting of late.

The 28-year-old maintains she finds the jabbing "absolutely ridiculous!...She is not fat at all and I am actually offended people are giving her such a hard time over this."

Kardashian may be taking the taunting a bit personally because she feels she doubles the size of Tony Romo's main squeeze.

"I am probably twice Jessica's size," Kardashian blogs, "so what do you guys think of me then?"

While doing press to promote Leather & Laces, the Superbowl bash Kim will host in Tampa this Sunday, she claims "everyone seems to be asking me about Jessica Simpson's alleged weight gain."


It is truly good to see a girl stand up for her fellow woman in this matter. No stupid catty stuff. Good for you, Kim! (Be sure and go to that link and see other pics of both Jessica & KK, such as this one.)

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DTM on January 31, 2009, 11:53:36 AM
I would like to see this test of how the towel sits there the whole time. But she must start from the beginning of the shower....I need visuals people ....

thank you  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on January 31, 2009, 04:32:28 PM
I thought this was Kim Kardashian, but anyone know for sure???  Very interesting, and can't find anything more from this.
 

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on January 31, 2009, 04:57:07 PM
 That's Rukshana or however she spells it. Plus, I'm sure Kim considers herself to be infinitely above working the car show circuit, while the truth of the matter is that the average car show model contributes far more to society/honest entertainment than KK ever will.
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on January 31, 2009, 05:40:51 PM
Quote:

UncleSam said:
I thought this was Kim Kardashian, but anyone know for sure???  Very interesting, and can't find anything more from this.




::Look at chest::

Sir, you know damn well that ain't no Kim Kardashian.

That quote about using her big ass as a towel rack is maybe the single hottest thing I've ever heard. Excellent example of how a girl just saying the right words (without even talking dirty) can be infinitely hotter than a girl showing the goods.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: joenny on February 01, 2009, 10:06:11 AM
Quote:

UncleSam said:
I thought this was Kim Kardashian, but anyone know for sure???  Very interesting, and can't find anything more from this.




That is  Rukhsana from the UK at a car show.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DTM on February 01, 2009, 10:15:49 AM
I just realized that....
Rukshana looks more like Monica Bellucci.
Definitly would not mistake her for Kim.

thank you  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 01, 2009, 02:41:23 PM
Man, you must be a newbie -- ain't no way on earth that anyone could mistake Rukhsana with KK!

Rukhsana's boobs (especially if they were natural) on top of KK's butt, body and face = The Perfect Woman
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DTM on February 01, 2009, 05:52:36 PM
You must be talkin' to UncleSam ?
He went that way --->

thank you  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on February 01, 2009, 06:03:26 PM
just one small adjustment...

Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
Chloe Vevrier's boobs on top of KK's butt, body and face = The Perfect Woman




eureka!

we have a new scientific law !
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 01, 2009, 06:23:43 PM
DTM & Real, you both are right
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on February 01, 2009, 07:24:44 PM
Quote:

Real said:
just one small adjustment...

Quote:

TheZookie007 said:
Chloe Vevrier's boobs on top of KK's butt, body and face = The Perfect Woman




eureka!

we have a new scientific law !




Chloe Vevrier already IS perfect. No need to dilute with KK at all.  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GALVATRON on February 01, 2009, 08:20:59 PM
bwaaaahhh!

Te perfect woman is not Rookshana or Kim K, or Chole V; nor is it any combination there of. The perfect woman...
Has a cheery disposition
Rosy cheeks, no warts!
Play games, all sorts
Must be kind, she must be witty
Very sweet and fairly pretty
Take us on outings, give us treats
Sing songs, bring sweets,
Also, her name rhymes with Stan Pathaway.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: UncleSam on February 01, 2009, 08:22:45 PM
 
My bad.  I saw the pics of Rukhsana and did not know who she was until I saw KK and thought maybe... but now I see - obviously not.  I sit corrected! Anyway, both are hot and worth mention!  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on February 01, 2009, 10:27:40 PM
So now we know who the purple robot thingamajig truly lusts after .... Mary Poppins !   But ..... Julie Andrews has no tits !   Curioser, curioser .....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on February 02, 2009, 12:13:22 AM
Someone hasn't seen S.O.B.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: lactose_tolerant on February 02, 2009, 12:34:10 AM
Quote:

GALVATRON said:
bwaaaahhh!

Te perfect woman is not Rookshana or Kim K, or Chole V; nor is it any combination there of. The perfect woman...
Has a cheery disposition
Rosy cheeks, no warts!
Play games, all sorts
Must be kind, she must be witty
Very sweet and fairly pretty
Take us on outings, give us treats
Sing songs, bring sweets,
Also, her name rhymes with Stan Pathaway.




does ms pathaway get to hold a red cup in her photos?



lactose 'really awaits the answer to this one' tolernat
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GALVATRON on February 02, 2009, 04:36:08 PM
bwaaahhhh!

Red cups are fine. Photos with disposable plastic cups are pure trash. So that cup you just showed is not acceptable; but this red pimp cup is pure class.

There is also an exception if the disposable cup is actually a Big Gulp™; because, product placement is sometimes admirable.
(also, Julie Andrews is stacked)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 03, 2009, 05:17:35 PM
"Kim Kardashian's HUGE ASS NICE TITS!!!"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Brahma on February 04, 2009, 01:11:01 AM
I've never quite understood the point of videos that are just compilations of still photos.  Videos are supposed to be "moving pictures"--I want to see some motion, preferably bouncing boobies.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 05, 2009, 09:39:22 AM
They're slideshows set to music. Which is better than nothing if you do not have true moving pictures of the subject in question...you have to take what you can get sometimes
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 07, 2009, 10:55:14 AM
Kim Kardashian gets VelaShape

-- TheZookie "'oh Kim, your thighs are soooo meaty...' " 007
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: turbo on February 07, 2009, 01:44:25 PM
Here's a nice bikini shot of Kim.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GALVATRON on February 24, 2009, 08:04:25 PM
bwaaaaahhhh!

Kim Kardashian and her sister sure know how to party.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 01, 2009, 09:09:11 PM
That's Kourtney, the cute sister...yum!

CelebTV: "Kim Kardashian's 2010 Swimsuit Calendar Photo Shoot"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Brahma on March 02, 2009, 01:15:56 AM
I guess my point is that still pics are not hard to come by in and of themselves.  If I want to look at stills, I'll go find some stills.  If I go to a video site, I want to look at "movies."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: G_Wille on March 09, 2009, 07:33:51 PM
 
Quote:

 Here's an even better view of Kim's caboose!




It looks great often but occasionally looks bulbous in bikinis.


 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pulsar on March 09, 2009, 09:36:10 PM
The other sisters are built like Kim too, I guess shes just more know for it cuz shes the hottess.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on March 09, 2009, 09:48:43 PM
Quote:

G_Wille said:
 
Quote:

 Here's an even better view of Kim's caboose!




It looks great often but occasionally looks bulbous in bikinis.


   




oh ill take bulbous any day of the week.  especially when its attached to the rest of what she's packing...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: G_Wille on March 15, 2009, 10:41:10 AM
direct angle


 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 15, 2009, 07:38:26 PM
In GoldenEye's words, those ass cheeks are glorious cum-sponges...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 26, 2009, 02:31:51 AM
CelebTV: "Kim Kardashian and Reggie Bush's Sexy GQ Shoot"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 27, 2009, 08:35:37 PM
Quote:

"The Problem With Airbrushing Kim Kardashian"

Complex magazine has a photoshoot with Kim Kardashian coming up and Animal New York has a before and after airbrushing shot from the spread.



Now, it's tempting to look at this, say "so what," and just move on -- but, the practice of airbrushing women in magazines actually has real ramifications.

Take this pic of Kim Kardashian, for example. Opinions do vary -- and that's not a particularly flattering pic of her -- but I think Kim Kardashian is one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen.

Yet, in that pic they made her hips a little smaller, her skin tone more uniform, and her breasts, more symmetrical.

Now imagine you're the average woman trying to compete with that. You're not even competing with a stunningly attractive woman: you're competing with an idealized version of a stunningly attractive woman. How much damage must it do to even gorgeous women to see these images and know that they can't possibly measure up to the women they see in these magazines?

On the other hand, if you're a guy looking at the airbrushed shots and thinking, "Wow, that is what hot looks like," you're being suckered because no woman, not even the woman pictured in the photo, is that perfect in real life.

In other words, these photos set an unrealistic standard for beauty that no human being can possible meet and yet, because it's supposed to be a picture of a real person, it gives people a false impression.

I wonder how many women end up having plastic surgery in an effort to sculpt their features into a vision they have of a woman who has never existed anywhere except on the cover of a magazine? I wonder how many men passed up exceptional women because they came across rather common minor flaws in a woman's physique that they believed were uncommon because they've never seen them in a magazine shoot?

That's not to say these airbrushed shoots are helping to lead to demographic disasters we've seen across much of the Western world, but they are one factor out of many that's helping deteriorate the bond between the sexes and we would be better off as a society if magazines stopped photoshopping already beautiful women into perfect Greek goddesses.


Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on March 27, 2009, 10:27:08 PM
I think she looks VASTLY superior in the original. Why in fuck's name would you trim all that off a girl who's famous FOR her curves and thickness? That's stupid. And not all of the textured look on her thighs is actually texture...some of that's just uneven skin tone. I prefer the way her thighs really look instead of that creepy, inhuman mannequin-smooth sheen in the "after" pic. I wanna suck on those real thighs, and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in that.

And it is INCREDIBLY offensive that they lightened her skin.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 28, 2009, 04:35:02 AM
I give it up to Kim for not only putting the original photo up on her website (when Complex tried to pull a fast one and remove the original and replace it with the PhotoShopped version), she called out the magazine and said, "Look, I have cellulite, all curvy girls do, so deal with it!"

I wish more people would not try to achieve the impossible, as the article I quoted from said, since the idealized beauty you see in magazines is completely unobtainable. Kim Kardashian is a curvy, olive-skinned beautiful woman with cellulite. Deal!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GALVATRON on March 28, 2009, 09:15:41 AM
bwaaaahhh!

I'd support her opinion, except for the cellulite comment. That is just stupid. Perhaps she should stop shaving her legs and arm pits. All people have body hair, deal with it. Maybe she could stop showering too. All people have BO, deal with it. Oh, perhaps it will become proper to fart in public, all people have gas, deal with it... You see where I'm going with this. Just because she has cellulite, does not mean that cellulite is not somehow unattractive. Cellulite IS unattractive. I'm sure if she could chose to be a girl with cellulite or one without, she'd pick without.
The alternative to airbrushing is to simply not put her on any magazines. Everyone knows that magazine photographs are not a depiction of reality, they are art. Should they have told Michelangelo that David was too muscular and helped give little boys a bod body image? Perhaps a statue of a big fat guy eating Cheetoes™ would inspire people?

I say airbrush the damn cellulite. Cover up the acne. Wear the push up bra... I want to look at nice pictures. I can see fat, ugly, imperfect slobs walking down the street on a constant basis.

I do agree with Goldenye about the skin lightening thing though. Dark clear skin is just as pretty light clear skin.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on March 28, 2009, 11:28:17 AM
Quote:

GALVATRON said:
bwaaaahhh!

I'd support her opinion, except for the cellulite comment. That is just stupid. Perhaps she should stop shaving her legs and arm pits. All people have body hair, deal with it. Maybe she could stop showering too. All people have BO, deal with it. Oh, perhaps it will become proper to fart in public, all people have gas, deal with it... You see where I'm going with this. Just because she has cellulite, does not mean that cellulite is not somehow unattractive. Cellulite IS unattractive. I'm sure if she could chose to be a girl with cellulite or one without, she'd pick without.
The alternative to airbrushing is to simply not put her on any magazines. Everyone knows that magazine photographs are not a depiction of reality, they are art. Should they have told Michelangelo that David was too muscular and helped give little boys a bod body image? Perhaps a statue of a big fat guy eating Cheetoes™ would inspire people?

I say airbrush the damn cellulite. Cover up the acne. Wear the push up bra... I want to look at nice pictures. I can see fat, ugly, imperfect slobs walking down the street on a constant basis.

I do agree with Goldenye about the skin lightening thing though. Dark clear skin is just as pretty light clear skin.




Just quoting because though it contained no shoot-coffee-out-my-nose moments, this post from the GPR appeals to me on a common sense basis.

Personally, I think KK is woefully over-rated in every possible respect, and even if she WERE as amazing a physical specimen as the hype posits, I'd still find her unappealing given the reality of her as a person. Heck, even Chloe V (who IS as gorgeous as some pretend that Kim is) would be hard to tolerate in RL if she said and did the kinds of things that KK has been saying and doing in public on a regular basis for years.  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on April 02, 2009, 08:37:34 AM
Even Lil Kim cant resist touching that bodacious booty:
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on April 02, 2009, 09:50:09 AM
Quote:

Palomine said:
Heck, even Chloe V (who IS as gorgeous as some pretend that Kim is) would be hard to tolerate in RL if she said and did the kinds of things that KK has been saying and doing in public on a regular basis for years.  





well first of all beauty is subjective, i dont think anyone is pretending just to get under your skin.  

second, what exactly has she been doing and saying on a regular basis that is so very repulsive?...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ROUNDandHEAVY on April 02, 2009, 11:32:03 AM
You guys are nuts, KK is drop dead gorgeous, I'd eat her shit with a spoon.

Metaphorically speaking.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kojain on April 02, 2009, 12:05:15 PM
Kim is pretty hot, but I just can't look at her the same way anymore after she did that sex tape with Ray J. UGH!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Hugeboobfan on April 02, 2009, 02:24:04 PM
Quote:

GALVATRON said:
I'd support her opinion, except for the cellulite comment. That is just stupid. Perhaps she should stop shaving her legs and arm pits. All people have body hair, deal with it. Maybe she could stop showering too. All people have BO, deal with it. Oh, perhaps it will become proper to fart in public, all people have gas, deal with it... You see where I'm going with this. Just because she has cellulite, does not mean that cellulite is not somehow unattractive. Cellulite IS unattractive. I'm sure if she could chose to be a girl with cellulite or one without, she'd pick without.
The alternative to airbrushing is to simply not put her on any magazines. Everyone knows that magazine photographs are not a depiction of reality, they are art. Should they have told Michelangelo that David was too muscular and helped give little boys a bod body image? Perhaps a statue of a big fat guy eating Cheetoes™ would inspire people?

I say airbrush the damn cellulite. Cover up the acne. Wear the push up bra... I want to look at nice pictures. I can see fat, ugly, imperfect slobs walking down the street on a constant basis.

I do agree with Goldenye about the skin lightening thing though. Dark clear skin is just as pretty light clear skin.



Despite the fact that I dislike soda of any brand, I agree with this post 100%.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TeamCanada on April 02, 2009, 02:31:57 PM
Quote:

Pulsar said:
The other sisters are built like Kim too, I guess shes just more know for it cuz shes the hottess.




True, but strangely enough I find the youngest sister the most attractive of the bunch.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on April 02, 2009, 03:32:07 PM
Quote:

Real said:
Quote:

Palomine said:
Heck, even Chloe V (who IS as gorgeous as some pretend that Kim is) would be hard to tolerate in RL if she said and did the kinds of things that KK has been saying and doing in public on a regular basis for years.  





well first of all beauty is subjective, i dont think anyone is pretending just to get under your skin.  

second, what exactly has she been doing and saying on a regular basis that is so very repulsive?...




I did not mean to suggest that those who like her are pretending to literally ...just that there's SO much hype about her, and IMO it's unfounded even if it were being evaluated merely on her appearance. "Pretending" was a poor choice of word on my part... 'think' or 'imagine' would have been more accurate. And surely: I don't imagine anyone would pretend merely to annoy me... there'd be no point or benefit in that.

As for her words and actions... I'd frankly not know where to begin. I'm not referring to the reality show which (although it likely bears a relationship to reality) is scripted as all such shows are. I'm referring to just about every OTHER instance of her appearing in the media... on 'news' shows, in 'entertainment' coverage... even in the mainstream media (as with the recent 'monkey' incident days after that woman had her face eaten off by a chimp in CT). Pretty much EVERYthing I've heard come out of her mouth, or seen her do, reaffirms just about every single negative stereotype you can think of regarding uneducated, self-involved, superficial '**28**' who are famous for no other reason than being famous. In her case: because she has a large ass and made a (pretty crappy) sex tape. Sadly, THAT'S grounds for fame in our society, thus it's inevitable that individuals absent any actual talent or ability will be 'famous.' The fact that I KNOW this is the way things are doesn't make it one bit more acceptable.

MHO, which I've gone to pains to express in a mature manner appropriate to conversation at this adult forum. And I elaborated only because you asked.  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ROUNDandHEAVY on April 02, 2009, 04:38:49 PM
Well Pallie, I have to say I will probably never speak to her or watch her show or spend much time reading her inane comments, Butt as long as I can imagine nestling my face in her bulbous, wonderfully spherical, fleshy ass cheeks and motorboating, I am happy.

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on April 02, 2009, 05:21:46 PM
i think that some people are generally left with a bad taste in their mouths because she had a bad sex tape and because she's been friends with paris and because she's essentially famous for nothing moreso than anything she actually has done.  

but id be wary with confusing someone's portrayal in the media with their actual person.  ive never seen her be catty or condescending or aloof to an interviewer or fan a la paris/nicole. at least not to the degree to illicit open distain.  i see more people who simply view her though tmz colored glasses...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on April 02, 2009, 05:57:22 PM
Not a fan of Kim Kardashian, but DAMN, she's hot!

Q-"And here I thought she was just another Paris Hilton stick-figure"-BE
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: spid on April 02, 2009, 06:55:16 PM
I don't think Kim is the brightest girl ever, but she does not come off a malicious or mean spirited.  She and her sisters maybe spoiled, but other than that they seem like decent young women.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on April 07, 2009, 05:35:03 AM
at the Bravo awards 4-5-09
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: joenny on April 07, 2009, 03:11:04 PM
Quote:

anakinsrise said:
at the Bravo awards 4-5-09




Thanks. After watching this hi-res pic, I´d love to know how she looks without make-up.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on April 08, 2009, 03:27:34 AM
I generally find it really refreshing to see women without makeup, but I know I'm in a minority there.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ROUNDandHEAVY on April 08, 2009, 08:29:05 AM
Then so am I
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Janus on April 08, 2009, 09:27:35 AM
I'm learning most of these "celebs" are just someone's daughter. In this case she's Bruce Jenner's stepdaughter, but most of the time they are daughter's of cost-cutting tv execs who realize that self absorbed moronic teenage girls will watch any show about being fabulous, and gay men with boring personalities.

J- Grumbles and watches Magnum PI...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: BluePeep on April 08, 2009, 12:29:24 PM
Not to mention, that exact reasoning did infact get some music artists into the scene.........Who knows, maybe Kim will make an album like Paris Hilton.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on April 08, 2009, 03:59:58 PM
Quote:

Janus said:
I'm learning most of these "celebs" are just someone's daughter. In this case she's Bruce Jenner's stepdaughter, but most of the time they are daughter's of cost-cutting tv execs who realize that self absorbed moronic teenage girls will watch any show about being fabulous, and gay men with boring personalities.




Which ones are related to network execs? And Kim is, much more primarily, the daughter of the late and famed lawyer Robert Kardashian, who was (among other things) part of OJ's legal Dream Team back fifteen years back.

Nepotism's brought us some bad things (and at least one president), but it's brought us a lot of good things too. Some of the entertainment industry's finest talents and some of the greatest minds in business have come to us through family who were in the right position.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: lovefakeboobs on April 08, 2009, 06:40:03 PM
I think she said she a 32dd natural?
It something else to see this thread still walking since I started it in Dec of 2007
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GALVATRON on April 08, 2009, 06:45:10 PM
bwaaaahhh!

Ouch! Goldeneye sticking it to J.Q. Adams!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 09, 2009, 04:39:57 AM
Kim Kardashian wowing the crowd in an electric blue-and-white dress and black strappy sandals at the "I Heart Ronson" dinner party at Bar Marmont, April 3, 2009:



Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on April 09, 2009, 05:57:32 AM
awww... why not
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on April 09, 2009, 08:32:49 AM
Awww...thanks Shara!

Thanks for depicting her as my eyes normally see her.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Janus on April 09, 2009, 10:24:14 AM
 Yes, but they had some kind of talent or career aspirations beyond "shove a camera in my face 24-7, and watch me talk about toast." Then there's all these shows about vapid housewives and honestly...the hills reminds me to hug my parents for the genes they gave me.

 Nick Cage is Francis Ford Coppola's nephew, but he wanted to ACT. If Kim's a model...well then ok. If this is to be in magazines, fine. It's when we venture in hills/ housewives territory where I look at the screen and pull out a revolver. And don't get me started on all those shows about families with a million [censored].

 TLC used to mean The Learning Channel not Transforming Ladyparts to Clowncars.

J- I'm going to make a show about bachelors eating chips and playing video games all day. Maybe sell adspace to Frosted Flakes.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ROUNDandHEAVY on April 09, 2009, 10:26:52 AM
My try!!
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GALVATRON on April 09, 2009, 11:08:11 AM
Quote:

Janus said:
J- I'm going to make a show about bachelors eating chips and playing video games all day. Maybe sell adspace to Frosted Flakes.




bwaaaahhhh!

Like on Bromance?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Janus on April 09, 2009, 11:48:41 AM
I just looked that up. I have to hurt people now. I'm just gonna replace my hand with a chainsaw.

J- Madworld ain't got nothing on me.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 20, 2009, 02:46:18 AM
Quote:

Janus: TLC used to mean The Learning Channel not Transforming Ladyparts to Clowncars.


Sad but true. I hear they want to give Octomom a show of her own. Ugh.

Anyhow, here are Kourtney & Kim Kardashian in bikinis:

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on April 20, 2009, 08:46:27 AM

Quote:

Janus: TLC used to mean The Learning Channel not Transforming Ladyparts to Clowncars.




I thought it always meant that. Wow, I was tooootally off base.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 25, 2009, 06:54:00 AM
Zimbio: "2 out of 3 of the Kardashian Sisters Are Single"

Guess which ones?

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GALVATRON on April 25, 2009, 08:35:14 AM
bwaaahhh!

Three. Count them, three supervillains, each one with the same power she has.

Or, four if you count Chloe twice.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ltfields on April 25, 2009, 11:28:38 PM
Quote:

GALVATRON said:
bwaaahhh!

Three. Count them, three supervillains, each one with the same power she has.

Or, four if you count Chloe twice.




   

I DO!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GALVATRON on April 30, 2009, 10:48:13 PM
bwaaahhhhh!

Kimmie K sporting a nice refreshing Pepsi Throwback!
Also, her ass is big.
http://img37.imagehaven.net/img.php?id=KJPBLTFECZ_26654_28814_122_1182lo.jpg
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: turbo on April 30, 2009, 10:54:29 PM
Kim is doing something different with her hair in this pic AND it looks like she now has Derek Jeter as part of her entourage.
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: luvdemwhoppers on May 02, 2009, 10:13:11 AM
sorry if this one has been previously posted.

 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: homevintner on May 02, 2009, 10:51:04 AM
Nothing to be sorry about at all. Very nice!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on May 04, 2009, 02:36:05 PM
Quote:

homevintner said:
Nothing to be sorry about at all. Very nice!



More rack, less back!

Q-"But then, I'm a particular little cube"-BE
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: nards2 on May 07, 2009, 01:45:06 AM
Quote:

GALVATRON said:
bwaaahhh!

Three. Count them, three supervillains, each one with the same power she has.

Or, four if you count Chloe twice.




"We shall bring her to her knees!!!" I love that movie!!  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: thehank on May 10, 2009, 09:38:37 AM
Quote:

lovefakeboobs said:
Maybe I am a little out of touch does kim kardashian have a boob job.
She is very pretty dark skinned woman with a lot of curves to her. Her site said she about 27 so everything should start to be falling south in 10 years.




If she had a boob job, it was after her infamous "sex tape" because in that video, she isn't all that big.  Firm yes, but not that big.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on May 10, 2009, 04:12:42 PM
She's a C-cup with first-rate packaging. And she is olive-skinned, NOT dark-skinned. There are a whole lot of shades darker than hers.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on June 09, 2009, 10:11:33 PM
She's a C-cup with first-rate packaging. And she is olive-skinned, NOT dark-skinned. There are a whole lot of shades darker than hers.

Oh, come on! C-cup? ::)

Gotta be a D or more! Here is a Playboy pic!

Q-"Trust me, I'm right"-BE ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Reaver on June 10, 2009, 02:20:02 AM
DD at least
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on June 10, 2009, 09:38:28 AM
She's a C-cup with first-rate packaging. And she is olive-skinned, NOT dark-skinned. There are a whole lot of shades darker than hers.

She's easily bigger than JLH, who is a full C. I'd believe a D-cup (if not DD) with first-rate packaging.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on June 10, 2009, 10:06:38 AM
32DD, as said before
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on June 10, 2009, 12:51:30 PM
32DD, as said before

Where?!? ???

Q-"I demand a link!"-BE :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on June 10, 2009, 08:09:09 PM
I think she said she a 32dd natural?
It something else to see this thread still walking since I started it in Dec of 2007
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on June 15, 2009, 02:11:19 PM
*kisses Shara*  :-*

Thank you, dear! :D

Q-"At my command, no less!"-BE :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SteveZ on June 15, 2009, 05:57:56 PM
Woah, that Playboy pic is awesome!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on June 18, 2009, 10:47:23 PM
Woah, that Playboy pic is awesome!

You can thank me by telling me where you got that awesome avatar. ;)

Q-"Bouncy bouncy"-BE :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SteveZ on June 19, 2009, 07:01:52 AM
You can thank me by telling me where you got that awesome avatar. ;)

Q-"Bouncy bouncy"-BE :o

That was made by my girlfriend. A BEA-style self-portrait, if you will.  ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 13, 2009, 06:36:24 PM
SteveZ, your gf is pretty amazing. Thanks to her!

Daily Mail (UK): "Kim Kardashian earns her stripes in a skin-tight jumpsuit as she starts trans-America motor race" (http://www.**21**/?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1199373/Kim-Kardashian-earns-stripes-skin-tight-jumpsuit-starts-trans-America-motor-race.html)


Oh LAWD.

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: homevintner on July 13, 2009, 07:10:05 PM
Sheeeeit! 8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on July 13, 2009, 08:15:23 PM
*fans self* Oh dearie, that glorious ass is givin' me the vapors.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on July 13, 2009, 10:38:37 PM
SteveZ, your gf is pretty amazing. Thanks to her!

Daily Mail (UK): "Kim Kardashian earns her stripes in a skin-tight jumpsuit as she starts trans-America motor race" (http://www.**21**/?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1199373/Kim-Kardashian-earns-stripes-skin-tight-jumpsuit-starts-trans-America-motor-race.html)


Oh LAWD.



Mystikal--"Shake Ya Ass" (http://**21**/?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMY80kGvHdc)

Q-"Kim has a porn body"-BE :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ChrisR1 on July 15, 2009, 01:08:31 AM
.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on July 15, 2009, 09:58:55 PM
wow, thank god a second kim kardashian thread was started for no apparent reason.  it was obviously needed lol...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on July 15, 2009, 10:17:55 PM
wow, thank god a second kim kardashian thread was started for no apparent reason.  it was obviously needed lol...

There was a first? ???

[distracted]

Q-"OOOOH! SHINY!"-BE :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gabyybag on July 20, 2009, 12:30:45 AM
"Kim Kardashian jumping on a trampoline. In a bikini", The Superficial (http://thesuperficial.com/2009/07/kim_kardashian_jumping_on_a_tr.php). ;D

(http://www.woopics.com/uploads/27a7bc455f.jpg)


Couple more:
http://thesuperficial.com/2009/07/kim_kardashian_jumping_on_a_tr.php



see yaa... =)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 31, 2009, 01:17:16 AM
Nice airborne sideways ass shot of our Kim there :)

In sadder news, apparently, Kim Kardashian and Reggie Bush are splitsville (http://www.**21**/?http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/07/28/kardashian.bush/index.html?iref=mpstoryview). But on the other hand, good news, she's single again! Woooohooo!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Tugboatcap on July 31, 2009, 11:18:12 AM
Quote from: TheZookie007
In sadder news, apparently, [b
Kim Kardashian[/b] and Reggie Bush are splitsville (http://www.**21**/?http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/07/28/kardashian.bush/index.html?iref=mpstoryview). ...

Good!  Now maybe he'll concentrate on playing decent football and the Saints just might win some games this season...

Tugboat"I have season tickets on the Suite Level"Cap!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 05, 2009, 03:20:58 AM
The Inquistr: "Kim Kardashian’s Hot Bikini Twitpic - We want Moaaaarrr!" (http://www.**21**/?http://www.inquisitr.com/35910/kim-kardashians-hot-bikini-twitpic/)

Kim Kardashian, like a lot of other **28** embracing social media, loves to tweet and post pictures of herself, and we love it when she posts photos like the one above.

Earlier today, Kim Kardashian posted a photo of herself in a sexy little two-piece bikini on her Twitpic account. The photo is a preview of a photoshoot she’s doing for her new role as spokesperson for QuickTrim weight-loss products.

We can’t wait to see the actual pro photos and ads for QuickTrim now. Yes, the teaser photo worked, Kim. We want moaaaaarr!

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 05, 2009, 03:27:37 AM
In other news:

Quote
Inquistr: "Confirmed: Kourtney Kardashian is pregnant" (http://www.**21**/?http://www.inquisitr.com/32945/confirmed-kourtney-kardashian-is-pregnant/)

Kourtney Kardashian is pregnant with her first ch_ld.

Kourtney Kardashian, the oldest of the Kardashian sisters at 30, has revealed to E! Online that she is indeed pregnant with her first ch_ld. So who is the lucky dad? We don’t know yet, and Kourtney is keeping it all to herself, telling people that the only way to find out who the babydaddy is is to watch her show Kourtney and Khloé Take Miami, which debuts this coming Sunday on E!.

Earlier this year Kourtney split up with ex-boyfriend Scott Disick but wouldn’t confirm if they were back together or not. Shortly after that, Kourt was caught in a girl on girl smooch with her bisexual friend, Jackie so her sexuality was also the topic of much speculation.

But now this pregnancy bombshell? She’s gotta be into men still, but the only way for us to find out is by watching her show. Is there any law against using your unborn ch_ld as a promotional tool?

Kourtney is the oldest of the three main Kardashian sisters? Damn! I had no idea! She's also the shortest of the trio, so maybe that's what threw me off....cute as hell. I'd do her. Ooops, looks like someone beat me to it.

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on September 05, 2009, 03:35:24 AM
The Inquistr: "Kim Kardashian’s Hot Bikini Twitpic - We want Moaaaarrr!" (http://www.**21**/?http://www.inquisitr.com/35910/kim-kardashians-hot-bikini-twitpic/)

Kim Kardashian, like a lot of other **28** embracing social media, loves to tweet and post pictures of herself, and we love it when she posts photos like the one above.

Earlier today, Kim Kardashian posted a photo of herself in a sexy little two-piece bikini on her Twitpic account. The photo is a preview of a photoshoot she’s doing for her new role as spokesperson for QuickTrim weight-loss products.

We can’t wait to see the actual pro photos and ads for QuickTrim now. Yes, the teaser photo worked, Kim. We want moaaaaarr!



I'd have to say that the Kim K. twitter pic is the best of her I've seen in a while.

Rob "maybe I should take a picture of myself half-naked with my phone and post it online" Classact.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Jim31415 on September 05, 2009, 03:53:06 PM
Doesn 't Kim have a sister who's bustier than she is?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 16, 2009, 01:10:19 AM
Kourtney is the shortest of the legal Kardashian sisters, thus making her curves look slightly bigger, but I think Kim is the bustiest of the three.

Meanwhile, sequel to the Kanye West VMA nonsense (http://www.**21**/?http://mashable.com/2009/09/15/kanye-west-taylor-swift/), comes this:

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: HandyRefuse on September 16, 2009, 09:56:23 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Goldeneye on September 16, 2009, 12:40:57 PM
Kourtney is the shortest of the legal Kardashian sisters, thus making her curves look slightly bigger, but I think Kim is the bustiest of the three.

Meanwhile, sequel to the Kanye West VMA nonsense (http://www.**21**/?http://mashable.com/2009/09/15/kanye-west-taylor-swift/), comes this:



That's hilarious!!! But wow, all I can think is DAMN, look how that booty bubbles up. That must feel like heaven.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on September 16, 2009, 12:49:00 PM
I've already alluded to my lack of enthusiasm for any and all things Kardashian... but given the mention of Kourtney below, and since I caught 30 seconds of a recent episode of the Miami show as I was surfing channels, I can only say that Kourtney remains the least objectionable (physically only of course, as they're all repugnant if you're taking behavior/character/personality into consideration). Khloe was spanking Kourtney and had her skirt up to reveal thong-type underwear. Kourtney's ass was shapely, proportional and seemed free of cellulite, unlike that of either of her sisters. Sure, she's got fake boobs and behaves like a **92** slutty teenager despite being about 30 years old, but if you turn the sound off, she's still easiest on the eyes by a wide measure IMO.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on September 17, 2009, 06:57:39 AM
 ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pick on September 28, 2009, 11:27:17 PM
I still cannot believe how huge her ass is.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on September 28, 2009, 11:32:56 PM
Yeah, there's no way around it. That's one damn fine ass. A true thing of beauty.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pick on September 30, 2009, 01:21:45 AM
kim in profile
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on September 30, 2009, 05:02:54 AM
BEWILDERING BOOTY WOW
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on November 13, 2009, 12:46:12 PM
 :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pedonbio on November 13, 2009, 03:18:13 PM
Sure, she's got fake boobs and behaves like a **92** slutty teenager 

Around here that's a strong reccomendation.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on November 13, 2009, 04:38:06 PM
:D

If someone could morph that pic of Kim, that would be total awesomeness. :D

Q-"Pretty please?"-BE
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 18, 2009, 12:22:48 AM
Sure, she's got fake boobs
Actually, there's pretty conclusive evidence (that the rules prohibit me from presenting here) that shows that Kim's boobage is all-natural.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 29, 2009, 12:43:39 AM
Kim Kardashian went as Princess Jasmine this past Halloween (http://www.boobieblog.com/?p=5463)...completely appropriate.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on November 30, 2009, 04:06:14 PM
Actually, there's pretty conclusive evidence (that the rules prohibit me from presenting here) that shows that Kim's boobage is all-natural.

I've seen the evidence, and I believe it, too. :D

Kim Kardashian went as Princess Jasmine this past Halloween (http://www.boobieblog.com/?p=5463)...completely appropriate.

She was also Wonder Woman in 2008, and she made out wonderfully in that costume as well. :)

Q-"Next year, she should be a nudist"-BE :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 03, 2009, 03:16:45 AM
Have you seen the promo poster for season 4 of Keeping Up With The Kardashians yet?

(http://www.aceshowbiz.com/images/news/00029235.jpg)


PopEater: "Exclusive Pic: Khloe Kardashian Loves Her Body" (http://www.**21**/?http://www.popeater.com/2009/10/07/khloe-kardashian-life-and-style/)
Quote
...Khloe discussed the affect her childhood had on her weight. "When I was a kid, I was always the chunky one. I thought the food was making me feel better; I used to get teased and picked on all the time."

Having tiny sisters didn't help. "When I was a chunky little 8-year-old and I had these two beautiful sisters, I'd wonder, why don't I look like that?. Now I hate it when people compare me to my sisters. Kourtney's 5 feet, I'm 5-foot-10 and Kim is 5-foot-2. I will never look like them. No matter how skinny I am, that body will never be mine," Kardashian described.

"People think that Kim and Kourtney are 5-foot-7 and that I'm 6-foot-4. But they're really short. I have a normal body; stop comparing me to them," she added.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on December 09, 2009, 06:57:47 AM
In New York 12-8-09
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 10, 2009, 07:09:19 PM
Kim & Khloe featured in the Photoshop Disasters (http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2009/12/life-style-kardashian-diet-secret.html) blog:

(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_EHZsoUS6SIA/Sx7GYJsZQ-I/AAAAAAAAFfI/hnKWuF7sT0s/kardbloodyashians.jpg)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on December 10, 2009, 07:26:07 PM
Kim & Khloe featured in the Photoshop Disasters (http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2009/12/life-style-kardashian-diet-secret.html)

Well, it sems several of the posters at the blog have noted that the discrepancy between the tape around Khloe's waist and the tape extending from her body could be the fact that they are two sides to the same tape, with centimeters on one side and inches on the other. While we can't say that for certain, there is reasonable doubt that the editors at Life & Style magazine screwed up as badly as it first appears.

Q-"Besides, I'm staring at Kim's awesome jugs!"-BE :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Glottis on December 10, 2009, 07:28:12 PM
Sometimes the photoshop disasters people are morons. Tape measures usually have centimeters on one side and inches on the other. I'm more concerned about the creepy tint to their skin.

edit: too slow
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 11, 2009, 12:21:06 AM
The problem with a lot of the guys at PsD is, they expect to see mistakes in any digital photo they view, which means that even when there aren't any, they've preconditioned themselves to expect them. You know what I mean?

In any case, I paid no one there any mind -- I saw Kim K. and thought "I gotta share this with the BEA Forum!" :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 24, 2009, 12:42:53 AM
YouTube: "Carl's Jr. New Grilled Chicken Salads - Kim Kardashian" (http://www.**21**/?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYWQ5sX0-5Q)

Nice, but Padma Lakshmi (http://www.**21**/?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzwxmy1TWNM)'s ad has KK's ad beat by a country mile.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on December 24, 2009, 04:41:07 AM
YouTube: "Carl's Jr. New Grilled Chicken Salads - Kim Kardashian" (http://www.**21**/?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYWQ5sX0-5Q)

Nice, but Padma Lakshmi (http://www.**21**/?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzwxmy1TWNM)'s ad has KK's ad beat by a country mile.


Thanks for the vid Padma is smoking hot,and i miss Hardee's Cinnamon & Raisin biscuits  :'(
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 02, 2010, 05:57:14 AM
"Kim Kardashian Wins Best Costume" (http://www.phillyd.tv/2009/11/02/kim-kardashian-wins-best-costume/)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 12, 2010, 12:28:16 AM
Why is this man smiling? And what is he looking at?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Freddy on January 18, 2010, 07:32:20 PM
He is admiring the pumpkin patch laid out before him. 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 29, 2010, 02:01:20 AM
HuffPo: "Kim Kardashian Trumpets Unretouched Bikini Pics (PHOTOS)" (http://linkblur.com/?http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/28/kim-kardashian-trumpets-u_n_440957.html)

Hurray!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on February 03, 2010, 06:04:53 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 12, 2010, 03:22:44 AM
Stop the presses! Hold the phones! Momentous news ahead!:

The Huffington Post: "Kourtney Kardashian Tastes Her Own Breast Milk"

Kourtney Kardashian is breast feeding baby Mason, and since her family is hearing all about it, so are we.

"Wow my sister has changed. She used to whip her boobs out for no reason. Now she does it to feed her ch_ld," Khloe tweeted Thursday morning.

And apparently, to feed herself.

"Kourt just admitted that she tasted her own breast milk. Ummmm TMI," Khloe continued.

Kourtney gave birth to son Mason Dash Disick in December.


-- TheZookie "I'll be willing to wait in line behind the kid for a chance at those milkshake makers :D" 007
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on February 18, 2010, 05:14:51 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 19, 2010, 03:28:48 AM
VIBE: "Take Your Pick: Beyoncé or Kim Kardashian" (http://linkblur.com/?http://www.vibe.com/photo-galleries/vanessa-and-angela-simmons-sneaker-launch?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter)

Sorry, B, you can stick with Jay "Joe Camel" Z. I'll take Kim K. thankyouverymuch. 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pick on February 22, 2010, 01:34:03 AM
This should end up in the morph request section
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pick on February 24, 2010, 01:00:35 AM
and a side perspective
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on February 24, 2010, 04:56:01 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on February 28, 2010, 06:21:49 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pick on March 01, 2010, 11:57:44 PM
new butt shot
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: colt13 on March 05, 2010, 06:07:42 PM
http://thesuperficial.com/2010/03/kourtney_kardashian_definitely.php?bfm_index=0&bfm_page=0

A shot of Kourtney's milk filled boobs.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 11, 2010, 02:26:43 AM
The same site claims KK had implants put in (http://thesuperficial.com/2010/03/kim_kardashians_implants_and_o.php). Yeah, right.

Anyhoo...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: stevepre739 on March 14, 2010, 01:20:47 AM
Check this one out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q69Igo7xcGA
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: arflech on March 14, 2010, 08:54:04 AM
^^I thought the more common accusation was butt implants
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on March 18, 2010, 06:39:55 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Feral on March 18, 2010, 11:07:54 AM
Did they ever reveal or say anything about Khloe's suspicions that she had a different parent then the other two?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on March 22, 2010, 10:57:24 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 27, 2010, 02:59:07 AM
^^I thought the more common accusation was butt implants
Yeah, women are much much too quick to hate on our Kim with absolutely no evidence. As I've said before, I've seen some pictures (from a source verboten on this site) that show that she's au naturel, both top and bottom.

Meanwhile:

The Sun: "Meet the SWAGS*" (http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/2909877/Meet-the-new-super-WAGS-dating-footie-stars.html)

The upper-right picture of Kim is one of her lesser ones; the Playboy cover shown below that on the same page, though, more than makes up for it :)




*super wives-and-girlfriends
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on March 27, 2010, 04:51:02 AM
she certainly has perfected the art of looking ridiculously fierce...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on March 27, 2010, 09:37:45 PM
Seeing Zookie's post reminded me to look for Kim's Playboy photoshoot pics, but I can't seem to find them...

...is Hef really that stingy with his pics?!? :o

Q-"Sweating buckets over K.K."-BE :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on March 28, 2010, 06:43:32 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on April 01, 2010, 05:00:10 PM
"Insert your own caption here ________"...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MaxBigfoot on April 01, 2010, 05:01:35 PM
"Insert your own caption here ________"...

A caption is not what I would like to insert...   ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: onion_writer on April 01, 2010, 05:02:36 PM
I don't mean to sound . . . old . . . but why is she famous? And why have her 15 minutes not expired?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Feral on April 01, 2010, 05:28:28 PM
I think its because of her AND her two sisters, and the fact they do have a reality show. So we're stuck with them for at least a couple more years.  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on April 01, 2010, 06:00:31 PM
I don't mean to sound . . . old . . . but why is she famous? And why have her 15 minutes not expired?

the answer to both is; tits and ass ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on April 01, 2010, 10:14:15 PM
the answer to both is; tits and ass ;D


And tits and ass never get old.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Heftify on April 02, 2010, 01:22:20 AM
"Insert your own caption here ________"...

Are you sure you didn't just mean "Insert your own ________ here"... ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on April 06, 2010, 11:34:39 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on April 08, 2010, 05:23:19 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 08, 2010, 07:05:51 PM
A frontal view of the same picture:
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 08, 2010, 07:08:08 PM
More of her recent Tweet pics here (http://linkblur.com/?http://www.theinsider.com/news/3255482_Kim_Kardashian_Tweets_Sexy_Pics_Following_Break_Up_Rumors).
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 13, 2010, 03:31:24 AM
Kim K at Tao
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on April 13, 2010, 11:00:58 AM
sweet eye candy...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: anakinsrise on April 13, 2010, 01:24:03 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 25, 2010, 12:00:55 PM
F-Listed: "Kim Kardashian Poses Naked for Harper's" (http://flisted.com/96939/kim-kardashian-poses-naked-for-harpers-photo/)

"In a slight departure from the perpetual bikininess that we’ve seen her in lately, Kim Kardashian decided it was time to stop messing around and just show the world her full monty. And show she did in the May issue of Harper's Bazaar. But more than just ripping off her clothes for Harper's, Kim also decided to use her nude foray to make a statement. So rather than letting the photo editing wizards at the magazine slim her down and smooth her out, Kim appears completely unairbrushed. She wanted to use her shoot as a way to encourage a healthier body image among girls. Aww, how sweet!
Quote
"I feel proud if young girls look up to me and say, 'I'm curvy, and I'm proud of it now."
But Kim wasn't always as comfortable with her famous curves, telling Harper's:
Quote
I was wearing a C cup by the time I was 11. I would go to bed and pray, 'Please, Lord, don't let my boobs grow any bigger.' I hated what was happening."
Seriously Kim? What would ever give you the impression that bigger wasn’t better? We're exceptionally happy about how you (and your assets) turned out."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on April 25, 2010, 12:51:57 PM
she's looking fine in that picture.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on April 26, 2010, 08:46:50 AM
darn tootin'
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on April 26, 2010, 12:30:12 PM
F-Listed: "Kim Kardashian Poses Naked for Harper's" (http://flisted.com/96939/kim-kardashian-poses-naked-for-harpers-photo/)

Kim: "I was wearing a C cup by the time I was 11. I would go to bed and pray, 'Please, Lord, don't let my boobs grow any bigger.' I hated what was happening."

So the Lord said "Ok, I'll stop with the boobs" and then made her ass ginormous.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on April 26, 2010, 01:32:58 PM
Wonder-Butt
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on June 07, 2010, 06:58:00 AM
Here's Shape magazine's May 2010 cover.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ooze3d on June 07, 2010, 07:06:39 AM
I'd love to see the original photo for that cover... I'm betting at least 2 more inches on the hips minimum.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on June 26, 2010, 12:25:49 PM
I'd love to see the original photo for that cover... I'm betting at least 2 more inches on the hips minimum.

might have to agree....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on June 28, 2010, 02:56:48 PM
Must give the crowd what they want.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on June 28, 2010, 03:45:40 PM
huge-lip guy....

guy with red phone in the back is obviously not aiming at face
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on June 28, 2010, 03:57:34 PM
I like the smile on the girl to the far left.  She must be feeling some tube-steak.

And that red phone is orange.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on June 29, 2010, 12:17:59 AM
I want this job.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on June 29, 2010, 12:21:30 AM
And if PopEater is to be believed, our Kim may be the next Lara Croft (http://www.popeater.com/2010/06/08/kim-kardashian-lara-croft/). Wonder Woman, maybe, but Lara Croft? I dunno...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on June 29, 2010, 01:30:37 PM
so close, yet so far away....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: north on June 30, 2010, 09:10:50 PM
Another pic of Kim to wow over...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on June 30, 2010, 10:21:07 PM
and not even a butt in sight
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on July 01, 2010, 05:18:47 AM
so close, yet so far away....

ASStounding !!!  She is so MASSive !!! 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on July 01, 2010, 02:01:37 PM
ah-ha! The money shot for the crowd.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on July 01, 2010, 02:47:35 PM
so close, yet so far away....

A mold should be made of that butt.  It could be used for the design of future ATM machines.  I wouldn't mind sliding my card through that crack.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on July 12, 2010, 04:54:20 PM
Just plain "holy shit."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on July 12, 2010, 05:09:04 PM
Lord have mercy !
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pacman on July 12, 2010, 08:22:15 PM
It's not my wife's..... but yeah I guess it's a pretty nice hinder.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Expaanding on July 13, 2010, 12:51:48 AM
Just plain "holy shit."

Oh yeah!!! There are a ton of pics Kim in a black Pepsi outfit from last years 2009 Bullrun Rally. Pics of her in White from 2010 Bullrun rally are just coming in! So HOT!!!

If I were a race car driver at the Bullrun, I'd for sure get distracted by Kim end end up in the wall!!



Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: on July 13, 2010, 01:02:01 AM
I love me some Kim, but..a wild Coco appears!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: colt13 on July 16, 2010, 12:28:15 PM
I love me some Kim, but..a wild Coco appears!

How is there not a rip in the space time continuum? Two planet sized half moons orbiting around each other like this.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on July 16, 2010, 01:26:03 PM
maybe she'll license one of those "sex dolls", lol.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SamV on July 16, 2010, 01:36:56 PM
Okay so which one is the real Kim, and which one is the wax replica? ???

I say the real Kim is the one on the left, only because of the gravitation effect I see taking place on her boobs. ::) :-[

Anyone else want to hazard a guess?

Sam "wondering if their backsides match as well, and how much wax that took to make it happen" V
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SamV on July 16, 2010, 01:44:12 PM
I love me some Kim, but..a wild Coco appears!
TMZ ran an "ass-off" between Kim and Coco based on those pics, and according to what was reported Kim won.

But both T and me says Coco desires either a re-count, or at the very least a chance to put her best ass... ah, forward. ::) :-[
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on July 16, 2010, 01:52:32 PM
TMZ ran an "ass-off" between Kim and Coco based on those pics, and according to what was reported Kim won.

But both T and me says Coco desires either a re-count, or at the very least a chance to put her best ass... ah, forward. ::) :-[

the one on the right is the wax, and the butt is not as big as the real Kim ;).  This is not uncommon for the Madame Tussauds wax museum.  I was at the L.A. one last week and they had a Salma Hayek one and she had a very flat chest (compared to the REAL Salma), picture below taken by me (c) AgentDee
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on July 16, 2010, 02:05:01 PM
The lefty is sexy and full of life, the right one is plain, drab and dead.
So left is real.

Also I vote for Coco's magnificentass as opposed to the smaller one of kim.
Coco is so large that each side could be considered as a separate unit.  

But if I had a choice I would pick Kim up for a ride while dropping off Coco to the curb any day of the week.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on July 17, 2010, 07:56:50 PM
take a bite of that apple.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on July 19, 2010, 01:03:18 AM
man alive.

her body is mind blowing.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on July 19, 2010, 11:38:13 AM
Kim showing her cupcake in I believe one of the International editions of PB.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on July 19, 2010, 01:46:14 PM
I like the cupcake.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on July 19, 2010, 05:36:28 PM
No matter how many times I look at it, I just can't believe it. Good Lord. It looks like the "after" image of a morph!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on July 20, 2010, 01:12:35 AM
Another pic of Kim to wow over...

(http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=526219.0;attach=133527;image)

Epic bikini-top adjustment! :o

(http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=526219.0;attach=135817;image)

*blood rushes out of brain, into penis, causing instant fainting*

Q-"I wonder if that's even possible"-BE <--(thinking in my head)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on July 20, 2010, 01:32:39 AM
um, Q_BE, you may wanna remove that 2nd pic in your post or you may get dinged again by the mods :(.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on July 20, 2010, 01:40:24 AM
um, Q_BE, you may wanna remove that 2nd pic in your post or you may get dinged again by the mods :(.

No worries…the first pic was a quoted image pic from the poster north. In fact, it's a quoted thumbnail image pic from north, because the full attached image he posted earlier in this thread is 2995 x 2801 pixels, which is why the thumbnail was the much better choice to display in reference to his quoted post. 8) Thus, that image is not subject to the 1-1-1-1 rule, and I can attach (and also display in fullsize via UBB image code) my cropped and resized version of his image, which I separately attached to my post.

Believe me, coming off a recent ban, I wouldn't do this if I wasn't absolutely certain I could.

Q-"But I'll check the rules again just to be sure"-BE ::)

EDIT: Here's the salient rules, as I see them:

Quote
You may post/attach/link only one unmorphed image per thread in a 24-hour period…(Formerly called the "1-1-1-1" rule.)

You may attach/link images that already exist on the BEA servers, but not more than 5 of them per thread in a 24-hour period.

One newly-posted image by me, and one linked image by north. If you want to count the larger coded image I linked in the very post to which I attached it, that would make for precisely two linked images, which would still be far within the limits of the rules.

So, yeah, there you go. Referenced for the umpteenbillionth time. :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MP on July 20, 2010, 02:09:13 AM
No matter how many times I look at it, I just can't believe it. Good Lord. It looks like the "after" image of a morph!

You like big ass like that? Really? hmm have 1/2 korean butt. Mean no butt just little cupcakes lol. Never would want Ass like Kims. No. not at all. You really like?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on July 20, 2010, 02:37:23 AM
You like big ass like that? Really? hmm have 1/2 korean butt. Mean no butt just little cupcakes lol. Never would want Ass like Kims. No. not at all. You really like?

Like it? I'd worship it.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 20, 2010, 04:14:07 PM
Half-Korean butt is nice too. (What's the other half, by the way?) But Kim's is just...spectacular.

Four quick links:

YouTube: "Kim Kardashian Dressup" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjSIMvWoOZ8) (tries and fails to pull tight jeans over that ass)

TC Magazine: "Kim Kardashian in purple top" (http://www.totallycrap.com/galleries/gallery_kim_kardashian_in_purple_top/)

YouTube: "Kim Kardashian on Burma" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws_RPhBk9tM) (the Kardashians try to be socially responsible)

**29** Odor: "Kim Kardashian Shows Off Her Awesome Talents: Here (http://www.celebrityodor.com/galleries2/2010/7/kim_kardashian_beach_bunny_swimwear_fashion_show/index.php) are some shots of Kim Kardashian showing off her 'talents' while attending the Beach Bunny Swimwear fashion show. A lot of people consider Kim talentless and underserving (sic) of her fame but most people haven’t consider the fact that talents can lay around the chest and ass area."

:)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on July 21, 2010, 01:38:46 PM
big macs
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pick on August 23, 2010, 08:24:19 PM
kim in i think elle?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 29, 2010, 03:16:11 PM
Recently CNN's Larry King Live (guest-hosted by George Lopez) had the Kardashians on to talk about things:

"Kim: 'I love letting people in my life'" (http://cnn.com/video/?/video/showbiz/2010/08/20/lkl.kardashians.how.started.cnn)
"Kim and Kourtney in their own words" (http://cnn.com/video/?/video/showbiz/2010/08/20/lkl.kardashians.beyond.drama.cnn)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on August 29, 2010, 04:45:45 PM
Recently CNN's Larry King Live (guest-hosted by George Lopez) had the Kardashians on to talk about things:

What's even cooler is that George ALSO had them on his late-night show (Lopez Tonight) on TBS last week, and the segments were as funny as hell, AND they will be re-airing this on Thursday, Sept. 2, so set your TIVOs, DVRs, and screen-capture devices now, people! We've got some major Kardashian hotness to catch! :o

Q-"That means you, BoobWatch One!"-BE ;)

EDIT: Post #4444 for me. That is awesome! :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on August 30, 2010, 07:53:47 AM
need more pictures with her awesome buttocks actually in them :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on August 31, 2010, 12:51:36 PM
need more pictures with Shara's awesome buttocks actually in them :D

Fixed. ;D

Q-"Did I just say that?"-BE :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 04, 2010, 09:16:21 PM
Well shara, this is close, I think...(more here (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1308866/Kim-Kardashian-gets-steamy-naked-men-just-photo-shoot.html)).
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: bignatslover on September 05, 2010, 06:49:52 AM
need more pictures with her awesome buttocks actually in them :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on September 05, 2010, 10:27:49 AM
Jeez. Looking at that photo too quickly just cleared my sinuses. Googly Moogly, what an ass!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on September 08, 2010, 11:10:44 AM
looking so voluptuous in this recent papz capture.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mercerwatch on September 09, 2010, 09:39:38 PM
Harpers Bazaar. No Photoshop, shot by herself.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on September 10, 2010, 12:33:14 AM
Playboy pic from 2007. Besides sex tape, only topless photo shot to date exposing breast.

Q-"Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though"-BE
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ValNTx on September 10, 2010, 01:08:28 AM
Show some decent connage or close the thread :) Val's Hubby 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on September 12, 2010, 03:41:01 PM
I'm genuinely surprised that no one here has yet mentioned the latest news about Kim Kardashian's rancor over the release of (rumored to be 25) outtake photos from her 2007 Playboy shoot at the Playboy Cyber Club. Here's just one of a bazillion celebcentric websites on the issue.

Quote
(from The Superficial, Sept. 9, 2010)

Kim Kardashian is apparently flipping out over Playboy.com releasing outtakes (above) from her 2007 photo shoot this week because I’m sure something like this wasn’t specifically written in the contract and agreed to in advance. They must’ve broken into her house and made her take a cut of the profits! No, not again! RadarOnline reports:

    The Keeping Up With The Kardashians star, who publicly expressed regret about doing the naked shoot, now has reacted privately about the new photos surfacing.
    “Kim was really upset that the new photos were released,” a source close to Kim exclusively told RadarOnline.com.
    “She freaked out that they were out there, she didn’t think that they were going to be seen again.“

You know what? I’m willing to accept Kim Kardashian has no clue how the Internet works and legitimately thought the issues would be recycled into textbooks for under-privileged children. (“Mommy, why can’t I stop reading my math book?”) That being said, I don’t know how she explains this letter written to her fans over a year after the shoot:

    There are a bunch of reports about me on the web claiming that I said I would never do Playboy again. They’re quoting me as saying, “It was a one-off. I don’t think I’ll do Playboy or anything like that again.”
    THIS IS TOTALLY FALSE!
    First of all, I have never used the term “one-off.” It’s simply not in my vocabulary.
    Here’s my thinking: While I’m not planning to pose for the men’s magazine in the immediate future, I definitely don’t want to close the door to the opportunity! I absolutely love Hugh Hefner and the rest of the Playboy team and appreciate the opportunity to work with them!
    Never say never,
    Kim

I think what she meant to say was:

“Oh, my God, Playboy raped me and forced me to do the shoot.
I’m just a strong-willed businesswoman trying to bring happiness to the world through a scripted reality show, carefully choreographed paparazzi shots of my mammoth ass and pretending I didn’t get famous by releasing my own sex tape for $5 million.
Justin Bieber Justin Bieber Justin Bieber.
Lindsay Lohan’s my new BFF.
[Various other Google Keywords here.]
DON’T EVER STOP LOOKING AT ME!

- Kim”

That sounds about right.

Playboy Outtake #1 is attached below. May I say, what a fine ass. 8)

Q-"More Kim Kardashian boobage coming your way"-BE
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mercerwatch on September 13, 2010, 05:44:53 PM
Gzoink,  :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on September 13, 2010, 06:25:46 PM
Outtake #2 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on September 28, 2010, 03:39:35 PM
If you luv brunettes as much as I do, not sure you could find a more beautiful girl than this...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mercerwatch on October 12, 2010, 10:28:37 AM
Strapped in...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on October 12, 2010, 11:10:47 AM
Strapped in...

She's bowling in HEELS? Now that's a commitment to fashion. ::)

Q-"Still hot, by the way"-BE

EDIT: Outtake #3, by the way.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on October 12, 2010, 01:24:06 PM
man oh man.  the things i would do to that fat ass... :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Adman on October 12, 2010, 06:52:49 PM
Love those W shots... butt looks amazing.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on October 13, 2010, 08:31:47 AM
man oh man.  the things i would do to that fat ass... :o

yup she should star in the next tomb raider :p
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on October 14, 2010, 12:01:48 AM
man oh man.  the things i would do to that fat ass... :o

In soviet Russia, big ass do things to you.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DJPFC on October 14, 2010, 02:55:21 PM
man oh man.  the things i would do to that fat ass... :o

Is that a real photo?  Her ass looks preposterously huge in that.  Is that really her or is it faked/morphed?

Actually, nevermind... I just Googled it and realized it's for real.  WOW.  That's amazing.  Truly.

And speaking of asses, we've got a new model coming in a couple of weeks who is going to rock some worlds in that department as well.  :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on October 15, 2010, 12:57:55 PM
EDIT: Outtake #3, by the way.

I just can't wait to see more of this set.  Thank you so so much.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on October 15, 2010, 01:24:09 PM
I just can't wait to see more of this set.  Thank you so so much.

Don't thank me, thank the attention-whore.

Oh wait: that's also me. ;D

I don't have any more outtakes (I don't have a Playboy Cyber-Club subscription), but I do have this.

Q-"I'd like more outtakes myself"-BE 8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheBoobGuy on October 15, 2010, 01:44:20 PM
Sweet Mary and all her wacky nephews!

Thats hot.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Maski on October 15, 2010, 02:05:27 PM
Her legs are too short...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on October 15, 2010, 05:16:45 PM
Treading a fine line between expressing a contrary opinion and not saying anything if you can't say something nice...

IMO, Kim (and the rest of the Kardashian bunch) are among the most overrated gals in the media from both a visual and personality POV. Don't get me wrong: I like an ample feminine derrière, but there comes a point at which lines are crossed and that point has long since come and gone with regard to Kim ...it's just too much. It doesn't turn me off, but neither does it appeal to me... her big ass (I won't use the 'f' word though it'd not be out of place in her case) is merely a novelty. And when you factor in her personality (famous only for having a big ass and a boring sex tape, yet with a sense of **29** entitlement that dwarfs any other dozen TMZ regulars combined) ...well then what she looks like is moot: what she's like as a person is as effective as saltpeter.

By way of comparison, the CBS sitcom "Big Bang Theory" boasts a sexier rump (Kaley Cuoco as Penny) and a more appealing bosom (Melissa Rauch as Bernadette) than any gathering of Kardashians, and both Kaley and Melissa are genuinely prettier than Kim and neither has yet inflicted their egos upon the public via the media. And I say this despite the fact that both Big Bang actresses are blondes... this evaluation of KK is coming from a guy who always prefers a smoky brunette to a blonde (in real life and online) all else being equal.

This is merely my opinion of course... beauty being in the eye of the beholder and all that...  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on October 15, 2010, 08:47:51 PM
Don't thank me, thank the attention-whore.

Oh wait: that's also me. ;D
Q-"I'd like more outtakes myself"-BE 8)

I could behold her in my eye all day and all night long.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gmantwo on October 15, 2010, 11:54:47 PM
Pal, I tend to agree with you on all counts here. Is it possible that a gal's brain (or lack thereof) can overcome her obvious physical attributes? In this case, yes. I'll still look, but she doesn't get me going as much as she should. (I also love the Big Bang Theory!)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on October 16, 2010, 12:38:54 AM
By way of comparison, the CBS sitcom "Big Bang Theory" boasts a sexier rump (Kaley Cuoco as Penny) and a more appealing bosom (Melissa Rauch as Bernadette) than any gathering of Kardashians

I'd give you Melissa Rauch, only because Kim, while ample, isn't an all-star out front. Out back...uh....yeah, not really with you on the Kelly Cuoco. Perhaps...Mena Suvari.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ayrton on October 16, 2010, 06:56:13 AM
I'm with you Pal...I like a small round ass.   I see way too many women with big asses. 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on October 16, 2010, 08:36:39 AM
who let the white chicks in? 8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: spid on October 16, 2010, 08:40:34 AM
Kim's ass is as close to perfect as your going to get.  I think the woman is gorgeous.  Her sisters are also nice looking women.  I do not care how they became famous I just glad she is out as a counterpoint to all the flat chest flat ass actress in Hollywood.   
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 16, 2010, 12:29:20 PM
I do not care how they became famous I just glad she is out as a counterpoint to all the flat chest flat ass actress in Hollywood.   
I have to agree with this. Enough of these no-curves women already. We need TITS and ASS, yo, big ones on both counts. Solid-gold eye candy. Speaking entirely as a horndog, even though Kim is single, I don't see me getting with her or marrying her -- but I would most definitely enjoy a roll in the hay with her or with any of her sisters, Kourtney especially. And I'm not usually into tiny (five foot) girls, but Kourtney...fuck a duck!

Happy 30th birthday, Kim! (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/16/kim-kardashian-turns-30-s_n_765220.html)

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Maski on October 16, 2010, 02:44:05 PM
I was just trying to be funny in my previous post. There is nothing I don't like about Kim. She is sexy as can be. I would not turn her down...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mercerwatch on October 16, 2010, 07:32:53 PM
There is nothing I don't like about Kim.

The only bad thing about Kim is Khloe, and that's pretty fucking awful....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: sithknight on October 22, 2010, 04:35:49 PM
Im fascinated with each new pic
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on October 23, 2010, 03:20:30 PM
The only bad thing about Kim is Khloe, and that's pretty fucking awful....

Lol, I was thinking along those lines as well. Khloe reminds me of a cross dressing tranny. As for Kim, everyone has their own particular taste, but I for one love her curves as well as her, IMO, beautiful face. But to each his own.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: spid on October 23, 2010, 04:03:14 PM
I never understood the dislike of Khole.  For me, at worst she is average looking.  She would be stunning if she had a little more padding in the right places.   
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on November 05, 2010, 07:49:29 AM
bad kitty...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: brakblake on November 06, 2010, 01:13:44 AM
bad kitty...


meow......:P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 06, 2010, 01:32:26 AM
I never understood the dislike of Khole.  For me, at worst she is average looking.  She would be stunning if she had a little more padding in the right places.   
I don't get the dislike against her either. She's not ugly but I think the problem is that she is always in the company of her even more pretty sisters, so she looks bad in comparison. I'd still do her (after I did Kourtney & Kim at least five times each previously, of course).
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on November 06, 2010, 09:22:01 AM
be nice to Chloe or I'll unleash the Snooky on you
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TeamCanada on November 06, 2010, 01:53:55 PM
Pal, I tend to agree with you on all counts here. Is it possible that a gal's brain (or lack thereof) can overcome her obvious physical attributes?

Indeed it is possible, I'm definitely in that camp. There's been several models over the past few years, pro and amateur, who's personalities I've had a chance to learn about, and it almost completely turned me off them. And like Palomine, I'm growing incredibly tired of all these "celebs" who seem to ba famous pretty much just for existing.

However... to me, Kim is an exception. Personality aside, I think she's gorgeous, I love her voice, and I would wreck that until neither of us could walk ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on November 06, 2010, 04:05:36 PM
definition of hourglass figure.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 22, 2010, 06:20:31 PM
definition of hourglass figure.
Fuck a duck! Lemme have summa dat!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 22, 2010, 06:22:14 PM
CelebParasite: "Kim K is looking healthy" (http://www.celebparasite.com/6079/Kim_k_is_looking_healthy.html)

Question: who is the other, bigger, lady in this picture??
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gOOber on November 22, 2010, 06:32:46 PM
Quote
As long as you're safe, Kimberly.
And I can gaze deep
Into your starry eyes, baby, looking deep in your eyes,
baby,
Looking deep in your eyes, baby, looking deep in your
eyes, baby,
Into your starry eyes, oh.

The songwriter obviously wasn`t writing about Ms. Kardashian. ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 23, 2010, 05:36:03 PM
Suze Orman is giving a black eye to the sisters about their (overly-expensive) "Kardashian Kard" (http://www.doublex.com/blog/xxfactor/suze-orman-kardashian-sisters-you-are-denied). I agree with Suze on this one.

Did you catch Kim's appearance on The Apprentice (http://www.movieweb.com/tv/TEzLMEr1MQqEDE/kim-kardashian-visits-octane) last week?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 01, 2010, 11:44:41 PM
HecklerSpray.com loves to take the mickey out of Kim Kardashian. Some of their funny article titles include:


"Khloe Kardashian Marries That Bloke She Barely Knows" (http://www.hecklerspray.com/khloe-kardashian-marries-that-bloke-she-barely-knows/200940015.php)

"Kim Kardashian Notices Lack Of Attention, Gets New Boyfriend" (http://www.hecklerspray.com/kim-kardashian-notices-lack-of-attention-gets-new-boyfriend/200940049.php)

"Inevitably Grim News: The Kardashians Have A Clothing Line" (http://www.hecklerspray.com/inevitably-grim-news-the-kardashians-have-a-clothing-line/201050293.php)

"The Kardashian Sisters Aren’t Just Soulless Shill Machines" (http://www.hecklerspray.com/the-kardashian-sisters-arent-just-soulless-shill-machines/201053628.php)

"Kim Kardashian To Launch A Music Career And Possibly Murder Sound Itself" (http://www.hecklerspray.com/kim-kardashian-to-launch-a-music-career-and-possibly-murder-sound-itself/201052664.php)

and

"Kim Kardashian Holds A Cat The Wrong Way, The Massive Bitch" (http://www.hecklerspray.com/kim-kardashian-holds-a-cat-the-wrong-way-the-massive-bitch/201045481.php)

LMAO



And then there was the infamous story (http://www.popeater.com/2010/11/30/kardashian-konfidential-sisters-interview/), repeated in their new book Kardashian Konfidential, where KK said that she prayed to God to make her breasts stop growing. Since He made her ass grow astoundingly instead, I guess this proves that God has a healthy sense of humor.
Quote
Kim, you write in 'Kardashian Konfidential' how you had a hard time with your body as a young girl.
Kim: Kourtney
used to torture me and think I was odd because I had big boobs. I was 11 when I got my period and I started developing. I would sit in the bathtub, take a washcloth, put it under really hot water and put it against my boobs and pray to God, please don't make my boobs grow any bigger. And Kourtney would be like, "Your boobs are so big and ugly!" She was so mean and then I would have to wear a bra and she would say, "Who wears a bra? That's so disgusting." It was so embarrassing.

Do you hate it when people say you're famous for being famous?
Khloe:
I don't hate it. I just don't really understand it. I don't care what people think really, but I do think in my opinion we've worked really hard to be where we are. It's not like we just sit there posing on the red carpet.
Kourtney: I think maybe at first we heard that more often, but people who watch the show see how hard we work and how we have different companies.
Yeah, because having different companies totally means that you aren't famous for doing JACK ALL.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: YamatoChan on December 02, 2010, 07:31:16 AM
'2 – This was the least cruel photo of the entire shoot – rumour has it that, following the cat picture, Kim Kardashian then kicked a pony square in the knackers and pitched a weasel through a fifth-storey plate glass window.'

this made me chuckle
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on December 03, 2010, 07:38:46 PM
The more I see it, the more I just can't believe it (http://thegrumpiest.com/?p=12496). It's just so damned big!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 04, 2010, 04:56:24 AM
Courtesy of Complex Magazine:

"Tweet Dreams: Kim Kardashian's Hottest Twitpics" (http://www.complex.com/blog_galleries/tweet-dreams-kim-kardashians-hottest-twitpics/)

"A Guide to Kim Kardashian's Best Back Shots" (http://www.complex.com/blogs/2008/11/21/a-guide-to-kim-kardashians-best-back-shots/)

"Super Twosday: Kim Kardashian" (http://www.complex.com/blogs/2009/05/19/super-twosday-kim-kardashian/)

"The Complex 7: Kim Kardashian" (http://www.complex.com/blogs/2009/03/06/the-complex-7-kim-kardashian/)

"Complex: Kim Kardashian, Feb/Mar 2008 cover shoot" (http://www.complex.com/GIRLS/Galleries/Kim-Kardashian-Gallery)

"Complex: Kim Kardashian, Jun/Jul 2009 cover shoot" (http://www.complex.com/GIRLS/Galleries/KIM-KARDASHIAN-2009)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on December 15, 2010, 06:53:41 AM
ass of the decade?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on December 15, 2010, 09:00:34 AM
definitely famous ass of the decade :p
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on December 15, 2010, 10:29:35 AM
ass of the decade?

definitely.  in fact were she to go ass to ass (pun intended lol) with the previous champ, I think she'd take down J-Lo pretty easily as well.  As far as women in pop culture widely noted for fantastic asses, she may even be the g.o.a.t.

though a silhouette of nicki manaj might be growing more and more visible in her rear-view. (pun intended again) ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Feral on December 15, 2010, 04:07:58 PM
I doubt Minaj could catch up to her. Even though there are probably better and bigger (at the same time) butts the KK's in and around Hollywood, simply for the fact that they and Minaj are black. J-Lo and KK are of course, not white - but their skin isn't dark enough to exclude them from being praised for having butts like that. If I sat down and thought about it long enough, I could probably crank out a pretty decent list of black women who are C-list actresses (and probably act better then J-Lo) but just didn't quite get the same exposure that J-Lo did or KK does (whom the latter is famous just for no real reason.)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on December 15, 2010, 05:32:03 PM
oh i definitely agree just thinking of buffy the body, bria myles and angel lola luv right off the top of my head but I do think nicki manaj has a chance of getting up there in a pop culture sense.  if she is able to translate her growing success into musical super stardom id argue she'd enter a realm of ass noteriety on par with kim or j-lo regardless of her color.  but i also agree that as a black woman she wouldnt receive as much credit for having a unique body shape...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on December 24, 2010, 12:41:55 AM
Dear Santa, all I want for Xmas...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 25, 2010, 03:12:14 AM
definitely.  in fact were she to go ass to ass (pun intended lol) with the previous champ, I think she'd take down J-Lo pretty easily as well.  As far as women in pop culture widely noted for fantastic asses, she may even be the g.o.a.t.
In this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORUADnt35jo) from Lopez Tonight, he interviews Kim and Kourtney. Kim mentions that she finally met her idol Jennifer Lopez, and George asks the inevitable question...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Feral on December 29, 2010, 01:42:23 PM
... but I do think nicki manaj has a chance of getting up there in a pop culture sense...

I am inclined to agree with you. If anyone has a chance, she does. During this holiday season her music was seemingly everywhere as the background for a few commercials that got a lot of air time.

Before, I would have said Queen Latifah could have done it, if she wasn't so heavy and had a bigger ass in proportion to the rest of her. Being a Covergirl is no small feat. Damn, she should've kept the tits.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on December 30, 2010, 02:16:00 AM
Kim Kardashian clicks all my physical buttons in a way very few women do, but the only reason I continue to rate Jennifer Love Hewitt higher is because I sense a stronger emotional maturity and personality sexiness that just can't be quantified… 8)

…tits, on the other hand, can be, and Kim has them in spades. A Playboy repost classic attached. ;D

Q-"Enjoy"-BE :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Carter on December 30, 2010, 05:30:29 PM
a rare bikini shot....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on December 30, 2010, 06:42:44 PM
a rare bikini shot....

A CHEVIOT SIGHTING! Quick, everyone come look! :o

How are ya, man? Long time, no see, no post! :D

Q-"Drinks for Cheviot are on me!"-BE 8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: omar1978 on December 30, 2010, 06:49:39 PM
The more I see it, the more I just can't believe it (http://thegrumpiest.com/?p=12496). It's just so damned big!


Perfect booty yes! I am becoming more "ass" tahtn "boob" man.. is this bad?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 30, 2010, 09:52:27 PM
Nah, it's all good. I rather think that it's easier to see and admire a BEA-level big booty than it is to see and admire a pair of BEA-level big boobs, in the wild.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 03, 2011, 08:40:18 PM
NY Daily News: "Kim Kardashian: 'I'm not as sexy as everyone thinks'" (http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2011/01/03/2011-01-03_kim_kardashian_covers_glamours_guy_issue_i_dont_find_myself_as_sexy_as_everyone_.html)

Uh-huh. Poor poor Kim. Boo hoo.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on January 04, 2011, 08:18:12 PM
NY Daily News: "Kim Kardashian: 'I'm not as sexy as everyone thinks'" (http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2011/01/03/2011-01-03_kim_kardashian_covers_glamours_guy_issue_i_dont_find_myself_as_sexy_as_everyone_.html)

Uh-huh. Poor poor Kim. Boo hoo.

I liked this quote:

Quote
Five years ago, Kim Kardashian thought she'd be "married with a kid or two" by the time she turned 30.

I may be wrong, but I'm going to venture a guess that most women with public sextapes with D-list **28** generally don't find domestic stability by age 30.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 05, 2011, 02:33:07 AM
She actually was married once before and had stepkids. I'm trying to remember how soon after the divorce that she did the sex tape with the lucky bastard. Still shaking my head in amazement that Brandy's little bro could snag that hot piece of ass...who knew he had it in him? :)

-- TheZookie "but from the evidence of that tape, she definitely had him in her though! multiple times too!" 007
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: omar1978 on January 05, 2011, 03:16:40 PM
NY Daily News: "Kim Kardashian: 'I'm not as sexy as everyone thinks'" (http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2011/01/03/2011-01-03_kim_kardashian_covers_glamours_guy_issue_i_dont_find_myself_as_sexy_as_everyone_.html)

Uh-huh. Poor poor Kim. Boo hoo.

She says:
""I'm a lot more insecure than people would assume, but with little stupid things," the reality star revealed. "When I get dressed, I'm always so indecisive."

And the brunette beauty said she's found accepting her curvaceous body to be a "process."


Guys, what is a PROCESS? is her crazy?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Djoser on January 05, 2011, 05:42:46 PM
she seems to be, of course in this world skinny girls like megan fox can brag about their bodies while curvy hotter girls can't...this is madness (yeah this is spartaaaa!! :P )
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 06, 2011, 01:01:27 AM
How about that? (emphasis mine):

Celebuzz: "Kim Kardashian Sizzles in Glamour (PHOTOS)" (http://www.celebuzz.com/kim-kardashian-sizzles-glamour-photos-s291571/)

"Kim Kardashian is kicking off her 2011 with the same mass appeal that 2010 bestowed upon her. She's showing off her curves in a whopping new spread in February's issue of Glamour Magazine.

In the cover story, Kim opens up to inteviewer (sic) Katie Couric about her insane popularity ("I get letters from little girls begging me to adopt them"), how said popularity has made it nearly impossible to date and her, um, assets ("I remember I would sit in the bath-tub, and I would put a hot washcloth on my boobs and think, Please, Lord, just please, I don’t want to grow any bigger. I would cry.")..."


The constant application of heat to her boobs must have caused an increase of blood supply, thus causing them to actually grow. So she was re-creating her body and turning it into the bombshell physique, unwittingly. YAY!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 16, 2011, 04:34:55 PM
She recently tweeted this photo and asked "Is this too sexy to tweet?"

Is that a trick question?

PS: MediaTakeout published this photo (http://mediatakeout.s3.amazonaws.com/articles/45993.html) of her from the side, showing off her most famous assets.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 18, 2011, 10:38:10 PM
By the way, both Kim & Kourtney will be interviewed on The Late Show with David Letterman in a few minutes.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: secretsauce on January 19, 2011, 10:10:25 AM
J-Lo and KK are of course, not white - but their skin isn't dark enough to exclude them from being praised for having butts like that.
It may not be good for differentiating themselves in the entertainment business, but I'm pretty sure both Jlo and KK would be considered white.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on January 19, 2011, 10:21:32 AM
seeing her I'm considering butt implants myself :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on January 19, 2011, 10:56:06 AM
It may not be good for differentiating themselves in the entertainment business, but I'm pretty sure both Jlo and KK would be considered white.

Another delurker! We're having a veritable cascade of them lately! :D

Bring out the WELCOME WAGON! :o

(http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=713906.0;attach=60124;image)

It contains your heart's desire, and that's different for everybody, so dream BIG! ;)

Q-"Welcoming delurkers since 10/10/2006"-BE
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Feral on January 22, 2011, 02:59:47 PM
It may not be good for differentiating themselves in the entertainment business, but I'm pretty sure both Jlo and KK would be considered white.

Well, that's what I mean - they are considered/accepted as/treated as if they were white, but they are not. Hollywood acts like Jlo and KK invented the big butt. They made it okay and mainstream for a famous person to have one.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on February 02, 2011, 11:38:12 AM
I wonder how much validity there are to these before / after surgery photo claims.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/kim-kardashian-before-and-after-boob-photos-nsfw (http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/kim-kardashian-before-and-after-boob-photos-nsfw)
(http://s-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal01/2011/2/2/12/enhanced-buzz-14951-1296667081-18.jpg)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Chelsea74 on February 02, 2011, 11:50:20 AM
I wonder how much validity there are to these before / after surgery photo claims.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/kim-kardashian-before-and-after-boob-photos-nsfw (http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/kim-kardashian-before-and-after-boob-photos-nsfw)
(http://s-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal01/2011/2/2/12/enhanced-buzz-14951-1296667081-18.jpg)

None :-X
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Jameslikesboobs on February 02, 2011, 07:45:23 PM
Kim is beautiful.
Kim's boobs are perfect to me.
Kim has pretty muscular legs (as of recently).
Kim is the only woman who I'd get in trouble for talking about.
I mustn't say anymore about Kim, b/c I have a girlfriend.
It's hard not to though.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 04, 2011, 04:48:55 AM
I wonder how much validity there are to these before / after surgery photo claims.
None at all. There is lots of photographic evidence (none of which I can put here of course) to show that Kim came by her bodacious figure authentically, both top and bottom.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ROUNDandHEAVY on February 04, 2011, 07:39:15 AM
seeing her I'm considering butt implants myself :P

That can BE arranged. :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Q_BE on February 04, 2011, 09:37:02 AM
Oh no! It's true! Kim Kardashian is really a T-X sent back in time to eliminate all other busty women in favor of herself! :o

Q-"Whatever shall we do?"-BE ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 09, 2011, 03:55:54 AM
"Kim Kardashian Does FHM UK" (http://theblemish.com/2011/02/kim-kardashian-does-fhm-uk/)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on February 15, 2011, 06:24:40 AM
And the Grammy for the hugest ass goes to...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on February 15, 2011, 09:46:08 PM
And the Grammy for the hugest ass goes to...

Unfortunate that they took the photo from the wrong side.

I bet someone yelled, "Hey! Get together for a big ass **29** photo!" But seriously, you think they got together and swapped big ass stories? Perhaps they went out for a big ass lunch. Maybe they even shared tips on where to buy big ass pants.

Ok, I'm done.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: luvdemwhoppers on February 16, 2011, 06:26:16 PM
And the Grammy for the hugest ass goes to...

in 1974 Cloris Leechmann got the role as "Frau Blucher."
If there's a re-do, babe in the center would work. Luv the hair.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 18, 2011, 09:30:51 PM
Here's our Kim the way we usually like to see her, with her assets on prime display.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Glottis on February 18, 2011, 10:50:36 PM
And the Grammy for the hugest ass goes to...

This is such a great photo, and I would have a hard time believing the people in the photo didn't get the joke.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Cammy Gee on February 19, 2011, 04:29:02 AM
 ::)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 24, 2011, 07:10:15 PM
Just in case it hadn't been put here before:

YouTube: "Kim Kardashian's SKECHERS Super Bowl Commercial - Break Up 2 Shape Up" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQWG__N9so0)

Look at that ass at the 20 second mark. Phew.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mercerwatch on February 25, 2011, 05:45:48 PM
Here's Kim with Lala (Mrs. Carmelo Anthony -right) and an un-ID'd, basketball wife in the middle.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shara on February 25, 2011, 06:04:01 PM
still mighty hittable
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 26, 2011, 01:44:44 AM
Oh, for sure. LaLa and Kim K are smokin' (check out LaLa's rack!), and even the unnamed lady in the middle is worth a gander or two.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on February 27, 2011, 09:06:44 AM
Here's Kim with Lala (Mrs. Carmelo Anthony -right) and an un-ID'd, basketball wife in the middle.
I think she is R&B singer Ciara. Here is an obvious fake, but very well done fake nonetheless. You'll notice its a previous beach bikini candid sans bottoms via photoshop.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on March 07, 2011, 03:54:56 PM
beached ass.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on March 07, 2011, 05:25:55 PM
beached ass.

Good God.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 07, 2011, 06:26:51 PM
Happy Booty Appreciation Day, Kim!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 12, 2011, 06:34:57 PM
Kim recently on the town.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on March 14, 2011, 04:15:25 PM
Two of the three guys snapping pictures are focusing down south.... hmmmm... strange.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mercerwatch on March 28, 2011, 04:48:44 PM
Tits!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on April 05, 2011, 06:44:08 AM
her ass cast a shadow.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on April 05, 2011, 07:47:54 PM
her ass cast a shadow.

...much like my erection.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: luvdemwhoppers on April 06, 2011, 04:34:32 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on April 07, 2011, 04:28:02 PM
I like how she embraces her attributes instead of hiding them.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on April 08, 2011, 02:38:47 AM
I like how she embraces her attributes instead of hiding them.
I agree, though admittedly her attributes are difficult to hide.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 04, 2011, 02:11:01 PM
I hate this guy ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: luvdemwhoppers on May 04, 2011, 04:53:14 PM
Sun UK & DailyMail uk never leave me down.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on May 04, 2011, 07:26:17 PM
oh wow, i never knew K-Hump was tapping that.

Well played..
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Adman on May 04, 2011, 08:19:40 PM
im 6'7" myself, I'd love a little toy like that to carry around, damn!  she's so cute and tiny next to him, I love short chick with big tits and ass   ::)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Glottis on May 04, 2011, 11:02:15 PM
Heh, she looks even more cartoonish in proportion next to Mr. Tall.

im 6'7" myself, I'd love a little toy like that to carry around, damn!  she's so cute and tiny next to him, I love short chick with big tits and ass   ::)

I think you used the wrong emoticon, that's the eye roll which implies that you are being sarcastic or think something is stupid. Unless that's what you are doing, in which case I'm completely confused
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: rackonteur on May 05, 2011, 02:26:10 AM
Heh, she looks even more cartoonish in proportion next to Mr. Tall.

I think you used the wrong emoticon, that's the eye roll which implies that you are being sarcastic or think something is stupid. Unless that's what you are doing, in which case I'm completely confused

I took it to mean "some guys get all the luck"...  ::)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 05, 2011, 03:36:26 PM
Did I mention that I hate that guy? Some guys have all the luck, indeed.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Feral on May 06, 2011, 02:12:16 PM
Heh, she looks even more cartoonish in proportion next to Mr. Tall.

I think you used the wrong emoticon, that's the eye roll which implies that you are being sarcastic or think something is stupid. Unless that's what you are doing, in which case I'm completely confused
There are quite a few people here who use the rolleyes smiley for entirely different/wrong reasons. There was even a thread about it somewhere. I am still struggling to get used to it.

Btw, KK is smokin.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on May 11, 2011, 11:48:56 AM
Two lucky bastards...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: luvdemwhoppers on May 11, 2011, 07:07:56 PM
 from the Mail uk "The 30-year-old reality star smouldered last night in a ruffled asymmetric cocktail dress as she arrived at the Midori Melon Liqueur launch at Trousdale nightclub in Hollywood, California."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MrLucky on May 11, 2011, 07:25:27 PM
I hate this guy ;D

:D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on May 12, 2011, 04:10:46 PM
little larger view of Zookies previous offering earlier in thread.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 13, 2011, 02:31:49 PM
Thank you, chorizo! I want that asssssssssss.... :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on June 06, 2011, 03:43:52 AM
Daily Mail: "Kim Kardashian says she loves her derriere as she poses on the cover of Cosmopolitan"

"It is one of the most famous and photographed derriere's in the world.

And it seems that Kim Kardashian is equally impressed by her backside.

The 30-year-old says she is proud of her world famous bottom, and once again denied that her posterior is cosmetically enhanced in a recent interview with Australian's Cosmopolitan magazine.

Talking about her backside, newly-engaged Kim said: 'I'm half Armenian, so the butt really comes from my dad's side of the family.

'It's a little bit bigger so you do have to work out more.

'I do squats and lunges. I try to do whatever I can to work out. It's all real.'

She said reports she has had 'butt implants' are 'ridiculous'.

'I'm proud of my booty and it's all mine. I have not had cosmetic surgery' she said.

Kim has admitted in the past that she has had Botox, and once again she reiterated that it is the only cosmetic procedure she has endured.

'I tried Botox once, but I have not had my nose done or anything done to my butt,' she said.

'No injections I'm very happy with the way I am.'

Kim dazzles on the front cover of the fashion magazine in a sequinned multi-coloured mini-dress, which shows off her gravity defying cleavage and ample curves."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Adman on June 06, 2011, 10:46:34 AM
I took it to mean "some guys get all the luck"...  ::)

lol, I totally missed these comments.  It was meant to be like a daydreaming sigh face... since there isn't one.  Yikes, I should be more careful around the emoticon police.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: rackonteur on June 06, 2011, 03:50:13 PM
lol, I totally missed these comments.  It was meant to be like a daydreaming sigh face... since there isn't one.  Yikes, I should be more careful around the emoticon police.

YAY! I was more or less correct!

Do I get promoted in the emoticon police force now? At least, maybe no more fetching donuts for everyone (just for the people that deserve attractive donuts)?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on June 15, 2011, 12:37:30 PM
Kim Kardashian appeared on The Tonight Show with That Dude Who Stole The Job Back From Conan O'Brien yesterday. Note the subtle veinage within her cleavage.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on June 24, 2011, 03:21:12 AM
Extra: "Kim Kardashian: A Tale of Truth and Booty"

"Voluptuous beauty Kim Kardashian is putting the plastic butt surgery rumors, er, behind her once and for all.

The bootylicious reality star  has turned to her family physician to help prove that her rear is 100 percent real. "My sisters have dared me to get a butt X-ray," Kim tells her doc. "I really just want to get it so I can show the whole world." But of course.

Younger sister Khloe put in her two cents and said, "You could just feel her ass up and see if it's real. You're a doctor, you'll know."

Khloe laughed and added, "The fact that Kim is actually laying (sic) on a table and actually getting an X-ray of her ass is, like, iconic. Are you serious?!" Tush tush.

Watch the sisters' wacky visit to the doctor's on Keeping Up with the Kardashians, on Sunday at 10:00 PM on E!"


Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Feral on June 25, 2011, 05:54:57 PM
I saw that but would those injections show up on an x ray?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on June 29, 2011, 01:50:09 AM
Gawker: "Anderson Cooper is Sick of Hearing About Kim Kardashian's Ass Too" (http://gawker.com/5816112/anderson-cooper-is-sick-of-hearing-about-kim-kardashians-ass-too)

This video is a hilarious three-minute snarkfest. Thank you, AC!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: uhhh on June 29, 2011, 02:46:23 AM
Gawker: "Anderson Cooper is Sick of Hearing About Kim Kardashian's Ass Too" (http://gawker.com/5816112/anderson-cooper-is-sick-of-hearing-about-kim-kardashians-ass-too)

This video is a hilarious three-minute snarkfest. Thank you, AC!
/


he shur showed herr!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Feral on July 01, 2011, 04:38:39 PM
Or maybe fat transfer surgery? Maybe he should have checked her for scars. That side by side pic of her now and several years ago before she was famous has me convinced shes had a lot of work done.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on July 02, 2011, 10:42:12 AM
Smoke on the water.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 03, 2011, 02:08:48 AM
Because not all of us can be as lucky as Ray J, Reggie Bush or Kris Humphries, our Kim has kindly agreed to shoot a 3D photoset for World's Most Beautiful Magazine. I believe in the business this is known as "fan service".
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on September 09, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
Kuatro Kardashian
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MobyNick on September 09, 2011, 06:16:43 PM
sit on my face ill tell you if its real or fake
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on September 09, 2011, 11:53:51 PM
Just sit on my face!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: volcano_ten on September 10, 2011, 01:20:21 PM
Some before & after comparisons here <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> :
<a href="http://www.mediatakeout.com/6833/exclusive_proof_kim_k_got_her_booty_enhanced.html" target="_blank">http://www.mediatakeout.com/6833/exclusive_proof_kim_k_got_her_booty_enhanced.html</a>

Amazing <img src="/images/graemlins/crazy.gif" alt="" />
She would be perfect with Abbi Secraa boobs!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 12, 2011, 05:25:01 PM
Awkward!

That's Why You're My Ex!: "Imagine Having To Sit Next To The Guy You’re (sic) Slutty Wife Had Sex With On Camera On A Long Plane Ride? Kris Humphries Doesn't Have To Imagine Anymore" (http://www.thatswhyyouremyex.com/crazy-stories/slutty-wife-sex-tape-sit-guy-plane-la-orleans/)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mercerwatch on September 14, 2011, 12:10:14 PM
Kim donned the Princess Leia slave costume for a skit in the pilot for a Muppet Show spoof Alligator Boots.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on October 31, 2011, 02:37:54 PM
Yes! She's back on the market.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 02, 2011, 04:36:42 AM
What a farce. The only good thing that could be said about the (what is now apparent) made-strictly-for-TV "marriage" is "well, at least it lasted longer than Britney Spears' 55-hour one". Or as one commenter said "I guess it's true: you can't make a ho into a housewife."

Anyways...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: emsjhs on November 02, 2011, 09:55:42 AM
it took her 72 days to realize that his tallywacker wasn't black or big enough to fill her v-jay!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 04, 2011, 12:11:43 AM
That's racist, size-ist and sexist all at the same time.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ThinWhiteDuke on November 04, 2011, 12:14:35 AM
That's racist, size-ist and sexist all at the same time.
But I give points for use of the term "tallywacker."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Expaanding on November 04, 2011, 02:39:03 AM
In my opinion Kim is 100% genuine real (no artificial aditives!), and evidently 100% available again, bonus! wish I had the money to be an eligible suitor!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Cutter on November 04, 2011, 06:06:01 AM
Soon to be former husband in the NBA, as he is not playing he is not making any money.

Part of her divorce petetion as I understand it includes a request to kill the spousal support clause.  Meaning she don't want to give him any money.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Bad Kitty on November 04, 2011, 08:52:06 AM
But I give points for use of the term "tallywacker."

I have to agree.

I am reminded of the game Bulletstorm, which while not a very remarkable game, did nickname a giant robotic dinosaur 'Waggleton P. Tallylicker'... which almost single handedly brought the whole game up a few notches.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheBoobGuy on November 06, 2011, 11:33:06 AM
I have to agree.

I am reminded of the game Bulletstorm, which while not a very remarkable game, did nickname a giant robotic dinosaur 'Waggleton P. Tallylicker'... which almost single handedly brought the whole game up a few notches.

I think I love you. NOONE I know has played Bulletstorm!

". . .and we never got a chance to tell him. . . :'( "
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Bad Kitty on November 06, 2011, 12:46:55 PM
I think I love you. NOONE I know has played Bulletstorm!

". . .and we never got a chance to tell him. . . :'( "
heeeee, i remember that line. god that was a great segment of that game. i giggled about it all night.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 29, 2011, 01:22:53 AM
little larger view of Zookies previous offering earlier in thread.

Good God, that ass is so scrumptiously solid and big. Damn.

Although this TMZ video (http://www.youtube.com/v/-a4PV4Cjz2o&rel=0) makes an interesting point about how we almost never see video of her ass, but mainly stills of it instead :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Tenshi on November 29, 2011, 04:07:54 AM
I think I love you. NOONE I know has played Bulletstorm!

". . .and we never got a chance to tell him. . . :'( "

*kicks you into a cactus*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pedonbio on November 29, 2011, 04:54:05 AM
As Tom Arnold said, "We are America's worst nightmare: White trash with money."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on January 05, 2012, 09:24:10 AM
New Years Eve @ The Venetian Casino in Vegas. I was in town same weekend, but down the street at Caesar's... I missed the ass parade.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Cutter on January 06, 2012, 04:39:14 AM
Ass parade?  Was the whole family there?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on January 06, 2012, 07:36:33 PM
Kim has all the ass I will ever need.  Forget the family.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on January 09, 2012, 06:39:24 AM
Ass parade?  Was the whole family there?
Actually, they were lol. The brother was next door at The Wynn, and older sister Kourtney was up the street at Paris. Here she is with her pimp, er' mom on the red carpet of her Tao appearance.  ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on February 14, 2012, 05:25:20 PM
Kim n Britney. Grammy party perhaps?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gonZo on February 15, 2012, 07:48:00 AM
 
(http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=9982211.0;attach=251726;image)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DENIZ on February 15, 2012, 10:44:33 PM
(http://img5.imagetwist.com/th/01001/x2rcnq7ri4nd.jpg) (http://imagetwist.com/x2rcnq7ri4nd/kim_private.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on February 20, 2012, 10:57:21 PM
My Lord what a body (http://thegrumpiest.com/kim-kardashians-big-ass-bikini-pictures-4/). I can't stand her fame whore family and every part of her personality grates on my nerves,  but as I've said before: "Like that ass? I'd worship it."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 21, 2012, 01:26:34 AM
My Lord what a body (http://thegrumpiest.com/kim-kardashians-big-ass-bikini-pictures-4/)....as I've said before: "Like that ass? I'd worship it."

I agree, most wholeheartedly :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on February 21, 2012, 03:15:20 PM
 :-*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on February 29, 2012, 10:54:29 AM
Rumpshaker
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on March 10, 2012, 10:05:22 PM
Fierce.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on March 20, 2012, 05:13:01 PM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on March 29, 2012, 01:24:37 PM
Fame whore... and I adore her even more.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on March 30, 2012, 12:24:15 AM
I just can't stop staring at it. It's just so beautiful!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DENIZ on March 30, 2012, 05:01:51 PM
(http://img51.imageporter.com/i/00915/xenotflg5n1h_t.jpg) (http://www.imageporter.com/xenotflg5n1h/kim__6_.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on April 12, 2012, 01:17:24 PM
Bombshell
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on April 12, 2012, 09:07:43 PM
Bombshell

Wow...gorgeous!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on April 14, 2012, 01:38:57 PM
Bombshell


Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on April 18, 2012, 02:45:13 PM
Talk show appearance. And people wonder why she's famous... (Click pic for butt movement)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 19, 2012, 03:30:34 AM
Fucking hell.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ayrton on April 19, 2012, 07:21:44 AM
She's alright,  but I don't get all the attention she receives.    I wonder what her face looks like without the tons of make up she wears.   As far as her ass goes,  I like a nice tight little round ass,  so that aspect is lost on me.    I see tons of big ass women everyday. 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on April 22, 2012, 12:25:06 PM
Little glamour cleavage.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gOOber on April 22, 2012, 12:41:21 PM
Little glamour cleavage.
A lady in distress. I wish I could help her. ::)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rentahero on April 22, 2012, 12:42:57 PM
She's alright,  but I don't get all the attention she receives.    I wonder what her face looks like without the tons of make up she wears.   As far as her ass goes,  I like a nice tight little round ass,  so that aspect is lost on me.    I see tons of big ass women everyday.  

I think she still looks great without it.  And there are some photos out there of her wearing less makeup than usual, and she's absolutely gorgeous in those.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rad on April 22, 2012, 01:11:41 PM
I think she still looks great without it.  And there are some photos out there of her wearing less makeup than usual, and she's absolutely gorgeous in those.

Scary ouch
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on April 22, 2012, 01:41:13 PM
I think she still looks great without it.  And there are some photos out there of her wearing less makeup than usual, and she's absolutely gorgeous in those.
(http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=526219.0;attach=258152;image)

I say she looks quite good without the makeup.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: zeo on April 22, 2012, 04:37:24 PM
I say she looks quite good without the makeup.
She looks like a real person without it. (this is a good thing in case someone misunderstands)

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 23, 2012, 03:30:28 AM
In that makeup-free picture, except for her nose, she looks a lot like one of my ex-girlfriends. Maybe that's why I like Kim? Who knows? ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on April 24, 2012, 12:18:00 AM
recent pic, wow
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on April 30, 2012, 02:20:14 PM
Who you calling "overrated"?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on May 10, 2012, 11:58:29 PM
Km Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 11, 2012, 12:06:04 AM
A blog of nothing but ass...Kim K's ass.

http://kimasskardashian.blogspot.com/
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on May 11, 2012, 12:20:23 AM
 ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 14, 2012, 10:26:28 PM
This mini-biography (http://m.imdb.com/name/nm2578007/bio) of our Kim on IMDB is brutal. I'm reproducing it here in case they take it down :)

Quote
Kim Kardashian is emblematic of the shallowness of American culture in the first two decades of the new millennium. While some cultural critics call her the prime avatar of the "famous for being famous" faux **29** crowd, she along with Paris Hilton is a new breed of cat whose **29** comes from the release of a sex tape and the canny exploitation of the resulting publicity. Like her good friend Miss Hilton (their relationship predates Kim's "**29**", Kardashian is possessed of photogenic good looks but is short of any other discernible talents outside of the bedroom. Both expanded their **29** by becoming reality TV "stars".

Porn pioneer Harry Reems has commented how surprised he is at how porn stars like Jenna Jameson are accepted now in mainstream culture. His life was ruined by his participation in porn in its "Golden Years". As for Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian, the release (accidental or not-so-accidental) of boudoir tapes didn't result in shame but celebration. America like ancient Rome seems to have shuffled off the moral coil of virtue of the Republic and is now enjoying its Imperial self in an orgy of ignominy. It's always more fun on the toboggan ride down the hill than it was schlepping up it in the first place.

The backlash against Kardashian has been ugly. Commenting on Kim and her family, the stars of Keeping Up with the Kardashians, English actor Daniel Craig told GQ magazine, "You see that and you think, 'What, you mean all I have to do is behave like a [expletive] idiot on television and then you'll pay me millions?'"

Mad Men (2007) star Jon Hamm was even more direct, saying in an Elle magazine interview, "Whether it's Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian or whoever, stupidity is certainly celebrated. " He went on to say, "Being a [expletive] idiot is a valuable commodity in this culture. You're rewarded significantly."

In the wake of Kim and her family members signing a new four-year $40 million deal for their show, Jonah Hill joined in on the pile-up, saying that, "The fact that the Kardashians could be more popular than a show like Mad Men is disgusting."

In the decadence that is America of the $15-trillion deficit and no serious plans from either party for a solution to the economic problems of the "Great Recession", Kim Kardashian is welcomed to her second White House Correspondents Association Dinner in Washington, D.C. in 2012 and made fun of not only by host Jimmy Kimmel but by the President of the United States, Barack Obama, himself and laughs merrily at the merriment. That the women's fame rests on the February 2007 "leaking" of a four-year-old home sex (for which she ultimately received $5 million from Vivid Entertainment) is an apt metaphor for socio-economic-cultural malaise in Washington and the country beyond, where everything seems to be run by amoral prostitutes in bed with each other and merely out for a buck.

Ouch.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Relentless on May 15, 2012, 12:52:24 AM
emblematic
faux
canny
photogenic
discernible
boudoir
ignominy
toboggan
schlepping
decadence
merriment

1. Must be practicing for the SAT.
2. Must have too much time on hands.
3. Feeding into the hands of fake **28** by spending an extraneous amount of time writing up an inflammatory biography on a major website about them, thus circularly proving the power and reign of aforementioned **28** and annulling aforementioned argument.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on May 15, 2012, 07:41:56 PM
This mini-biography (http://m.imdb.com/name/nm2578007/bio) of our Kim on IMDB is brutal. I'm reproducing it here in case they take it down :)

Ouch.

America, FUCK YEAH!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Hark on May 15, 2012, 08:09:13 PM
Zookie, thanks for posting that.  I agree with it 100%!!!    :o ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on May 16, 2012, 12:27:43 AM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 17, 2012, 03:55:48 AM
emblematic
faux
canny
photogenic
discernible
boudoir
ignominy
toboggan
schlepping
decadence
merriment

1. Must be practicing for the SAT.

Any adult who doesn't have those fairly-simple words in their vocabulary is definitely lacking.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: milom on May 18, 2012, 02:12:08 AM
[This mini-biography of our Kim on IMDB is brutal. I'm reproducing it here in case they take it down :)

Ouch.

It is interesting people have this opinion of her, because its kind of the same sort of generalized stupidity they think they're attacking.  Nobody else has actually "acted like an idiot", and gotten on TV and been paid "millions".  Maybe a million, but thats pushing it.

People snarl and roll their eyes at what a disaster and a trainwreck and idiot Kim Kardashian is, and deliberately ignore that the things she does rakes in tens of millions of dollars, and these moves she makes are not stupid - they're carefully plotted.

As a result, she is the primary breadwinner for her very large family, and insures they continue to live the luxurious lifestyle they are used to, that their dead biological father could no longer provide.  She has given them all lucrative jobs, including the hundreds of people employed by their TV shows and various enterprises.

What trips people up is that she does things that seem stupid, but are in fact extraordinarily sacrificial, selfless gambles.  Her sex tape was done on purpose, after seeing how successful it made her friend Paris Hilton.  Without it she wouldnt have all this.  How many women would be willing to do that for their family?

Her fake wetting to that basketball player was a sham.  She was raked over the coals for it.  But she made 15 million off it.  How many women could treat their dream wedding like that, to fund their family's good fortune?

If there's an accurate snotty comment to be made about Kim and what her life says about society, its that people are stupid enough to buy her products and believe that all it takes to get rich is be super hot and be a "fucking idiot" on TV.  But internally, none of this matters.  She must have decided at least a decade ago - to hell with them.  This is a cruel world, and to win you need to play the game.  She's playing it. 

People get pissed because women aren't supposed to do that, or be so good at it.
 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TeamCanada on May 18, 2012, 10:56:11 AM
It is interesting people have this opinion of her, because its kind of the same sort of generalized stupidity they think they're attacking.  Nobody else has actually "acted like an idiot", and gotten on TV and been paid "millions".  Maybe a million, but thats pushing it.

People snarl and roll their eyes at what a disaster and a trainwreck and idiot Kim Kardashian is, and deliberately ignore that the things she does rakes in tens of millions of dollars, and these moves she makes are not stupid - they're carefully plotted.

As a result, she is the primary breadwinner for her very large family, and insures they continue to live the luxurious lifestyle they are used to, that their dead biological father could no longer provide.  She has given them all lucrative jobs, including the hundreds of people employed by their TV shows and various enterprises.

What trips people up is that she does things that seem stupid, but are in fact extraordinarily sacrificial, selfless gambles.  Her sex tape was done on purpose, after seeing how successful it made her friend Paris Hilton.  Without it she wouldnt have all this.  How many women would be willing to do that for their family?

Her fake wetting to that basketball player was a sham.  She was raked over the coals for it.  But she made 15 million off it.  How many women could treat their dream wedding like that, to fund their family's good fortune?

If there's an accurate snotty comment to be made about Kim and what her life says about society, its that people are stupid enough to buy her products and believe that all it takes to get rich is be super hot and be a "fucking idiot" on TV.  But internally, none of this matters.  She must have decided at least a decade ago - to hell with them.  This is a cruel world, and to win you need to play the game.  She's playing it. 

People get pissed because women aren't supposed to do that, or be so good at it.
 

I agree that first IMDB article may have been a tad harsh (as accurate as it may have been), and yes, the general public can be pretty bad as well, buy as you basically said, it's the people who consume all this fluff that are the driving force behind it. It'll get old like every other fad eventually, but if you don't like it, just ignore it and it goes away, it's that simple.

However, while I do agree that Ms. Kardashian is doing some positive things with her **29**, and I'm sure for the most part she's a lovely person, I find it a little hard to swallow when people make that family out to be marketing-genious patron saints. Suggesting that Kim made this huge unselfish sacrifice to put a video of herself on the internet to provide for her family is just plain ridiculous. And if anything, it's a real kick in the nuts to both her biological father and step-father, who actually worked to make a name for themselves.

Just call it like it is: This is a family (at least 2 of them), that thrives on vanity, they stumbled on to a gold mine and they're milking it for all it's worth... more power to them I guess. But you can't really blame people for resenting the fact that all it takes to gain notoriety these days is to be hot and have famous parents, or to be a complete train wreck. So if there's any beef people should have, it should be at society for embracing and sensationalizing all of this. Or at Kris Kardashian who is making a fine living by whoring out her family... ugh.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on May 19, 2012, 03:19:45 AM
I like Kim for what she is, exotic looking curvy hottie, nothing more, nothing less, with that I will leave this pic RIGHT here ;).
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on May 19, 2012, 10:01:05 AM
I like Kim for what she is, exotic looking curvy hottie, nothing more, nothing less, with that I will leave this pic RIGHT here ;).

+1
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 19, 2012, 06:04:51 PM
Kim Kardashian: every man wants to bang her, every woman wants to have her lifestyle (and/or money).
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: milom on May 21, 2012, 08:39:24 PM
However, while I do agree that Ms. Kardashian is doing some positive things with her **29**, and I'm sure for the most part she's a lovely person, I find it a little hard to swallow when people make that family out to be marketing-genious patron saints. Suggesting that Kim made this huge unselfish sacrifice to put a video of herself on the internet to provide for her family is just plain ridiculous. And if anything, it's a real kick in the nuts to both her biological father and step-father, who actually worked to make a name for themselves.

Just call it like it is: This is a family (at least 2 of them), that thrives on vanity, they stumbled on to a gold mine and they're milking it for all it's worth... more power to them I guess. But you can't really blame people for resenting the fact that all it takes to gain notoriety these days is to be hot and have famous parents, or to be a complete train wreck. So if there's any beef people should have, it should be at society for embracing and sensationalizing all of this. Or at Kris Kardashian who is making a fine living by whoring out her family... ugh.

By all accounts her biological father was a brilliant man, first as a lawyer and then as an entrepeneur.  But he was gone from their lives early on.  Chris Jenner is a motivational speaker, which doesn't seem like it would bring in enough income to keep a family of nine (9!) in the rich life.  Kim is smart but doesn't have the chops to be a powerful lawyer and business person.  So legitimate sources of large income were not going to come in.

And frankly this seems like a silly place to point out how shameful and humiliating it is for parents to have a daughter that did/or is doing porn.  Everyone we like here is a porn star, or we wish this or that lady would do porn, or more hard core porn, etc.  This website then, is a towering monument to shame and degradation.  Does it feel that way?  Probably not.  I know it doesn't for me.

Also, I can and I will blame people for resenting Kim Kardashian.  I don't doubt that the galaxy of horrible people cum "reality tv stars" are crappy people and no one would blame anyone for resenting those freaks.  But this is situation where there shouldn't be any animosity.  In Kim's case this isn't about simple notoriety, its about manipulating a media-scape in an original way in order to rake in gazillions of dollars.  I get the impression her media empire makes far more money than her biological father ever dreamed of.  It doesn't make sense to sneer at that and hate it because it preys on the stupidity of people buying her crap, without weighing that against the supposedly legit work of her father defending OJ Simpson at his murder trial.

It doesn't hurt anyone, and the worst it can do is annoy you.  If she didn't do any of this, nothing would be different.  There'd still be stupid people irritating the shit out of you, with the huge MINUS of Kim's crazy amazing body never being seen in such intimate detail by you, me, or anyone else.  Weigh the pros and cons, and you'll realize this is a net fucking awesome thing for all of us, so just enjoy it.

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: zeo on May 22, 2012, 06:27:13 PM
What is annoying (to me anyway) is that the american public values entertainment and all surrounding it so highly and ignore much more important things in favor of it.

Kim Kardashian and those like her are nothing compared to the what is practically worship of professional sports.

Obama claims the power to disappear people and take anyone's property at his whim while congress and the rest of the government keeps wrecking the economy in favor of themselves and their friends and most the population doesn't even notice. They notice Kim Kardashian's new outfit and the first pick of the NFL draft... It's the skewed priorities I don't get.

At least entertainers do provide a service. Which is more than a lot of people in this society do these days. I don't blame the entertainers that society rewards their work so much, I blame the society which is collectively more concerned about the game and the gossip than their own well being.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SamV on May 22, 2012, 06:43:26 PM
This mini-biography (http://m.imdb.com/name/nm2578007/bio) of our Kim on IMDB is brutal. I'm reproducing it here in case they take it down :)

Ouch.
I'm of an age to recall a time before the rise of cable TV networks when I read similar diatribes written by the intelligentsia about the moral/educational bankruptcy in our culture all do TV airing such idiot fair like The Beverly Hillbillies; it's spin offs Petticoat Junction and Green Acres; Hee Haw, and so on. Yet here we are all these years later and some how our society managed to survive, even with masses of Americans (not counting all those around the world) who viewed and enjoyed programs like those.

What people like this poster on IMDB seems to forget that while they may harangue about certain **28** and their shows, they are not the attended audience. So if they have a problem with Kim and her family, all they have to do is change the channel; after all, in comparison to the three or so broadcast channels that were available in the old days, these days they have scores of channels to choose among and they should be able to find something more suited to sate their highly refined taste. ::) :-\   
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on June 06, 2012, 01:04:02 AM
Speaking of shame and degradation...

top: Octomom

bottom: Kim K
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on June 08, 2012, 11:50:38 AM
From an Mexican Esquire magazine :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on June 08, 2012, 07:39:34 PM
I'm actually more attracted to her sister Kourtney.At least she seems to have a brain but then you see who her boyfriend is and then you think maybe not.
Kim does prove one thing.Just because you're pretty doesn't mean you are good in the sack.Her tape was down right boring.I would still fuck her though.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 12, 2012, 02:22:56 AM
I've heard that about her sex tape many times, that she wasn't all that great. Guess what? I don't care! I'd still hit it! Besides, she was young then -- she may have improved since then ;)

I like Kourtney too because she's even more funsized which makes her boobs look even bigger, and she is definitely the cutest of the three.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 24, 2012, 01:53:24 AM
:)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on August 01, 2012, 12:13:07 PM
 :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on August 04, 2012, 09:09:48 AM
:P

Bikini
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DENIZ on August 04, 2012, 03:00:31 PM
no offense I bet she can wreck a toilet w/ her #2's 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rentahero on August 04, 2012, 10:33:04 PM
no offense I bet she can wreck a toilet w/ her #2's 

There's no correlation between the size of her ass and her bowel movements.  But if the fantasy pleases you...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: emsjhs on August 05, 2012, 02:09:25 AM
let's face it.  KK is a whore in every sense of the word.  but that does not mean  most men would not jump at the chance to get some of the booty !!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kichi_7 on August 05, 2012, 02:52:10 AM
let's face it.  KK is a whore in every sense of the word.  but that does not mean  most men would not jump at the chance to get some of the booty !!!

How is she a whore? She's far from my ideal type of woman so I know next to nothing about her, but I'm curious still.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gonZo on August 05, 2012, 07:45:40 AM
Deniz and emsjhs,

I've given you guys some leeway because Kim Kardashian is a public figure and subject to satire, but you've both posted multiple disrespectful comments about women in the past, and we have rules prohibiting that, so I'll have to stop you if you continue to post insulting messages here.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: luvdemwhoppers on August 05, 2012, 12:52:15 PM
quetion for the forum members
if Promiscuous women are called  "whores" what do you call their partners? /We have a prob here now don't we?
GoodtimeCharlie? curious minds would like to know
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on August 05, 2012, 07:32:37 PM
I so enjoy being part of a forum where slut shaming misogyny is treated with due contempt...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DENIZ on August 08, 2012, 09:27:18 PM
...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: calcifer on August 08, 2012, 10:12:26 PM
quetion for the forum members
if Promiscuous women are called  "whores" what do you call their partners? /We have a prob here now don't we?
GoodtimeCharlie? curious minds would like to know
I think the male equivalent would be "Whoratio"  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on August 10, 2012, 12:13:29 AM
 :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on August 13, 2012, 01:56:20 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gonZo on September 06, 2012, 11:19:51 AM
Whatever else might be said about Kim Kardashian, this dress makes her look pretty f'ing amazing.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 13, 2012, 04:29:30 AM
Bit of a nip slip.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 15, 2012, 06:32:39 PM
Our Kim stepped out yesterday in a sheer top.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on September 15, 2012, 09:29:21 PM
and sheer bra... :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on September 25, 2012, 11:12:07 AM
"Like,oh my gosh!My breasts look so big in this.I just know someone is going to put this on the BEA forum."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on September 25, 2012, 12:04:12 PM
gotta say her sister Kourtney was almost matching boob size for boob size there at the same event as the pic above, gotta love these curvy gals ;).

AD
8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 26, 2012, 09:24:52 AM
Yeah, Kourtney might be the shortest of the adult sisters (and the oldest of the most well-known trio) but she's always been a boobilicious pocket rocket...and her pregnancies definitely helped fill out her tops.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on September 27, 2012, 12:24:21 AM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on September 28, 2012, 12:11:47 PM
leaving a yogurt place in Hawaii ;D

AD
8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on October 02, 2012, 01:06:38 AM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on October 05, 2012, 12:19:53 AM
hippy chick
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pedonbio on October 05, 2012, 04:53:10 AM
quetion for the forum members
if Promiscuous women are called  "whores" what do you call their partners? /We have a prob here now don't we?
GoodtimeCharlie? curious minds would like to know

I have found the language we use regarding sex, and particularly women's sexuality, to be both charming and complex as well as emotionally charged. I don't use the word "whore" except in a few cases (Like Woody Allen's routine, "The Whore of Mensa") because it is too often used grossly incorrectly. I use "provider" or "sex worker" to describe women who provide sex for a fee. I use "john" to describe a man who patronizes sex workers. That comes from representing sex workers (and the occasional john) for close to 40 years.

There are problems that come up with language. For example, I consider "slut" and "slutty" and "sluttiness" to be positive descriptive terms; I consider "fuckable", "fuckability", and "fuckbabe" to be very positive conditions.

I regret that the wonderful old Anglo-Saxon word "cunt" has been treated as poorly as it has been in recent years.

And Ms Kardashian uses more than just makeup:
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on October 05, 2012, 09:35:08 AM
...There are problems that come up with language. For example, I consider "slut" and "slutty" and "sluttiness" to be positive descriptive terms; I consider "fuckable", "fuckability", and "fuckbabe" to be very positive conditions.

As mentioned before, I agree: those words needn't be derogatory... properly used, they have the potential to be very complimentary.

Quote
I regret that the wonderful old Anglo-Saxon word "cunt" has been treated as poorly as it has been in recent years.

And again I agree: I mourn the blanket of negativity that most people (and especially women) have towards that word. It's not a bad word... to me: NOT an insult in any way whatsoever. It's a noun that fits what it describes: something wonderfully small and tight and powerful.

Quote
And Ms Kardashian uses more than just makeup:

In addition to all the Photoshopping applied to ameliorate cellulite, etc... there's also that deal with the devil she made. ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on October 05, 2012, 10:39:13 AM
I have used the word "cunt"more towards males than females.When a friend does something stupid or pisses me off,I love calling them a "dumb cunt" or "stupid cunt".I love the way "cunt" sounds whenever someone says it.Maybe some female users could weigh in on the use of these words.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DJPFC on October 05, 2012, 11:10:53 AM
I have used the word "cunt"more towards males than females.When a friend does something stupid or pisses me off,I love calling them a "dumb cunt" or "stupid cunt".I love the way "cunt" sounds whenever someone says it.Maybe some female users could weigh in on the use of these words.

Yeah... I think you're in the vast minority on that one.  Most people can't stand that word and I personally detest it almost as much as the n-word.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on October 14, 2012, 11:31:10 AM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gonZo on October 14, 2012, 02:51:36 PM
Halloween shopping on Saturday.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 15, 2012, 02:52:36 AM
Conversation in the Kanye West/Kim K. household:

"Do these jeans make my butt look big?"

"No, your big butt makes your butt look big...now stop yer whining and get over here!"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on October 15, 2012, 09:07:31 AM
 :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 17, 2012, 12:33:32 AM
Booyah. (http://smokingsection.uproxx.com/TSS/2012/10/pov-kim-kardashian-see-through-skirt-pics)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on October 17, 2012, 09:16:37 AM
I have found the language we use regarding sex, and particularly women's sexuality, to be both charming and complex as well as emotionally charged. I don't use the word "whore" except in a few cases (Like Woody Allen's routine, "The Whore of Mensa") because it is too often used grossly incorrectly. I use "provider" or "sex worker" to describe women who provide sex for a fee.

But not "prostitute"?

It's funny: I think of "provider" as someone who hosts a website on their system.  :P

"Sex worker" makes me think of "social worker" or "construction worker".   ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on October 17, 2012, 10:33:05 AM
Booyah. (http://smokingsection.uproxx.com/TSS/2012/10/pov-kim-kardashian-see-through-skirt-pics)

Luv it how you can see the crack of her ass thru her skirt  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on October 17, 2012, 01:18:17 PM
(http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=526219.0;attach=277935;image)

I'll never cease to be amazed that what would conceivably be considered as unattractive on some other woman is somehow regarded as hot on her. Is it because the rest of her is decent looking? Or that her (what passes for) **29** renders her immune to the same factors that those not so brazen in their quest for fame must contend with? It certainly can't be her personality/persona.

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on October 17, 2012, 05:34:48 PM

I'll never cease to be amazed that what would conceivably be considered as unattractive on some other woman is somehow regarded as hot on her. Is it because the rest of her is decent looking? Or that her (what passes for) **29** renders her immune to the same factors that those not so brazen in their quest for fame must contend with? It certainly can't be her personality/persona.



The attraction is all in the ass for me. She's attractive otherwise, but I'm a curves man (T&A). I really don't care about any other aspect of her. Her tits are nice and all, but I've seen a comparable set on plenty of girls. Those hips and ass, on the other hand, practically make me weak-kneed. Put 'em on any lady and I'll pay attention.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: doctorx33 on October 17, 2012, 05:40:20 PM
The attraction is all in the ass for me. She's attractive otherwise, but I'm a curves man (T&A). I really don't care about any other aspect of her. Her tits are nice and all, but I've seen a comparable set on plenty of girls. Those hips and ass, on the other hand, practically make me weak-kneed. Put 'em on any lady and I'll pay attention.

What he said.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on October 18, 2012, 09:57:07 AM
What they said.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on October 18, 2012, 05:05:24 PM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on October 25, 2012, 02:19:54 PM
 :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on October 25, 2012, 09:54:20 PM
"No Kim, no matter how far you lean over I'm not going to look at them" said no guy ever after seeing that one.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on November 01, 2012, 04:51:52 PM
Catmeat or Batmeat?....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 02, 2012, 12:49:19 AM
You beat me to it :)

That's Kourtney as Batgirl and Kim as Catwoman, by the way.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on November 02, 2012, 07:10:57 AM
Not the best angle on that shot.  She should be lookin' hotter than that!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on November 03, 2012, 02:51:16 AM
No bra.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on November 05, 2012, 11:35:09 AM
Hips for days....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on November 06, 2012, 09:33:08 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on November 08, 2012, 07:31:42 PM
New bikini pic
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on November 10, 2012, 02:20:20 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on November 16, 2012, 06:46:41 PM
I guess this could have gone into the staring thread as well.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SamV on November 17, 2012, 04:15:46 PM
"Eyes Front Soldier!"

"SIR, YES SIR! I GOT MY EYES ON HER FRONT, SIR!"

"Carry on then!"
 :o :P ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on November 20, 2012, 10:48:48 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: detroitmaggs on November 21, 2012, 12:06:45 AM
;)

That's a morph but still awesome!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 21, 2012, 02:19:00 AM
A recent Twitter pic.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: k01 on November 21, 2012, 04:40:52 AM
:) wow just wow!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Zorro on November 21, 2012, 08:29:21 AM
Here's a morph I did. (A marine stares at the view!)  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on November 24, 2012, 11:33:58 PM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 06, 2012, 08:57:53 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 08, 2012, 03:27:31 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on December 08, 2012, 03:37:41 AM
;D

AD
8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 12, 2012, 09:13:48 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 13, 2012, 09:38:13 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on December 14, 2012, 07:48:49 AM
:)

Didn't Kanye West wear that the other night at the Sandy concert?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 15, 2012, 03:36:38 AM
Kim and Kourtney
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 22, 2012, 04:54:33 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 31, 2012, 01:32:34 AM
Her boobs look set to blow the hell up if this news report is true:

USA Today: "Report: Kim Kardashian, Kanye West expecting first chi1d" (http://m.usatoday.com/article/news/1799957)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on January 04, 2013, 01:18:38 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on January 05, 2013, 03:43:05 AM
I know she's been posted in this bikini but this is a front and back view.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MarcusAurelius on January 08, 2013, 03:47:09 AM
Not sure if this is the right place:

A young woman who evidently feels she compares rather favorably with Ms. K.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: big_is_good on January 08, 2013, 09:49:08 AM
I know she's been posted in this bikini but this is a front and back view.


Just imagine how much wider those hips will get now! Her waist will look like a pencil!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: dbmneto on January 08, 2013, 04:34:40 PM
(comment removed)
Your message was too bluntly critical, and may have offended others.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Demon on January 08, 2013, 05:49:16 PM
Not sure if this is the right place:

A young woman who evidently feels she compares rather favorably with Ms. K.

attractive yes...
Kim no ...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on January 18, 2013, 12:49:17 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on January 21, 2013, 01:23:20 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on January 26, 2013, 02:17:06 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on January 30, 2013, 11:50:33 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: dbmneto on January 30, 2013, 09:53:24 PM
(comment removed)
Your message was too bluntly critical, and may have offended others.
My apologies!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 03, 2013, 02:01:34 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Demon on February 03, 2013, 10:22:08 AM
:)
why are all of Tdotter's images named image.jpg
cmon man

Mod edit: yes, I know it's a min0r inconvenience to lose the original filename and to have to manually rename image when saving, but really: given a choice between 'image.jpg' posts and no posts at all from him and a few other users, which would you prefer? BTW, this has been explained more than once in other threads: by simply using the search (or google outside I bet) you could have answered your own question. Briefly, users who post from iOS devices (such as an iPad, etc...) with the Safari browser have all their file uploads automatically/forcibly renamed to image.jpg. So, it's out of their hands until some future software upgrade or work-around. -Palomine
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 06, 2013, 11:50:43 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 08, 2013, 02:58:56 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 09, 2013, 03:31:38 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 14, 2013, 12:47:55 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 16, 2013, 01:47:32 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: nowlegal85 on February 16, 2013, 10:12:25 AM
pregnant boobs!

(prohibited link replaced with screen shot)
You may not post any image or link that displays people under the age of 18.
All images on any linked page must be free of minors.
Please read the Forum Rules (http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=rules) before posting anything else. Thanks.
-moderator
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 18, 2013, 09:58:33 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 18, 2013, 01:17:02 PM
pregnant boobs!

(prohibited link replaced with screen shot)
You may not post any image or link that displays people under the age of 18.
All images on any linked page must be free of minors.
Please read the Forum Rules (http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=rules) before posting anything else. Thanks.
-moderator

And on his first post too! The poor chap was blinded by those fantastic headlights...

Quote of the day:

"The 32-year-old's famous assets were on full display as she literally busted out of her too-tight bra and black tank top. Not to mention, Kardashian donned curve-hugging leggings, as well.

According to the Daily Mail, Kardashian has already grown four cup sizes during her pregnancy, going from a 36D to a 36G!"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: fatisgood30 on February 18, 2013, 06:02:28 PM
"Pregnant Kim Kardashian struggles to contain herself on gym visit after 'increasing four cup sizes'"

Knowing how much she loves publicity, a sign of more pictures to come  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 18, 2013, 06:06:43 PM
Psssst, fatisgood30: we have a 21-page multi-years-old thread all about Kim K here (http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php/topic,526219.0.html).
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on February 19, 2013, 07:12:08 AM
^And, magically, here you are!  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SamV on February 19, 2013, 10:55:50 AM
^ ...all due to a wave of Gonzo's magic plunger. :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 21, 2013, 02:55:16 AM
There's magic in that there plunger!

Kim Kardashian was in my stomping grounds over Valentine's week, picking up US$500,000 per appearance.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 23, 2013, 12:14:05 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 25, 2013, 11:38:29 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on February 25, 2013, 12:04:21 PM
Say what you will.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Hark on February 25, 2013, 08:38:50 PM
Say what you will.


I shall say...bah-DAYUM!!!   :o ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on February 25, 2013, 09:33:04 PM
Say what you will.


I'll just say "yes."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on February 25, 2013, 09:46:39 PM
Cris would LOVE that butt!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on February 25, 2013, 11:11:35 PM
She has gained weight everywhere but that cabboose of hers has gotten even more impressive.  :o :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 27, 2013, 08:07:26 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 28, 2013, 02:49:11 AM
Good God, her bum is even more enormous now. I love it!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Offline on February 28, 2013, 09:53:44 AM
Two thumbs up!!!  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 01, 2013, 01:22:31 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on March 01, 2013, 10:56:56 AM
^It's like butt-expansion spread out over a period of days or weeks.

Don't show this one to Cris.  He'd love it.   :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: rackonteur on March 01, 2013, 11:59:37 AM
...butt-expansion spread out...

mmmmmm... redundancy...  ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on March 01, 2013, 12:06:19 PM
^LOL!  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 02, 2013, 02:47:02 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on March 05, 2013, 12:45:58 AM
Um, yes.

Yes.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 05, 2013, 09:06:27 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 06, 2013, 10:06:46 AM
I know Kim and Kourtney are short but they make Heidi Klum look like a WNBA player.Heidi is listed as 5'9 and a half.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SamV on March 06, 2013, 11:27:52 AM
Good God, her bum is even more enormous now. I love it!
Once in an interview "KiKi" revealed that when she was like 11 years old, she would pray for her boobs to stop growing.  :-\ ???
I guess she never made any similar appeals about her bum. ::)  :-X
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 07, 2013, 10:25:06 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 09, 2013, 04:22:14 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 13, 2013, 09:05:58 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: emsjhs on March 13, 2013, 04:35:30 PM
think I'll pass.  might fall in that ass crack and never be seen again !!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ThousanWhite on March 14, 2013, 03:37:07 PM
 
As long as those boobs stay big after she loses that baby weight
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Haku on March 14, 2013, 03:40:58 PM
hope her boobies stay this size
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 14, 2013, 10:35:08 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza Dewliddil on March 14, 2013, 10:38:17 PM
^Wow.  That's a very unKimlike picture.

Very hot.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Haku on March 15, 2013, 07:42:01 AM
very hot
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 16, 2013, 02:18:44 AM
She sure cleans up nice.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pedonbio on March 16, 2013, 06:24:36 PM
She sure cleans up nice.

Spot on!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 17, 2013, 02:04:23 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on March 20, 2013, 01:43:33 AM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 20, 2013, 03:26:42 AM
Those are some hips...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 20, 2013, 09:26:20 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on March 20, 2013, 05:19:33 PM
The people who made the motivational "Hang in there baby" posters would sell a lot more if this was the picture used. ^__^'
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on March 20, 2013, 07:13:28 PM
Those are some hips...

Yes indeed. Yes indeed.

Rob "getting lightheaded" Classact
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SamV on March 21, 2013, 11:01:42 AM
There was a time they were called "birthin'" hips, and given Kim's current state it makes a good deal of sense. :-\  ::)
But consider too the *ass*those hips have to support. :o :-X
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 21, 2013, 10:18:12 PM
Her breasts look huge here.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Carter on March 25, 2013, 05:40:14 PM
http://www.thesuperficial.com/kim-kardashian-pregnant-huge-black-outfit-03-2013
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on March 25, 2013, 07:00:45 PM
From Cheviot's link
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on March 26, 2013, 01:44:22 AM
http://www.thesuperficial.com/kim-kardashian-pregnant-huge-black-outfit-03-2013

Awesome number of pix of our cow girl Kim!  ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 26, 2013, 03:29:00 AM
And her nips are showing too...this is getting better and better....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 27, 2013, 11:27:17 AM
This is her from the Kelly and Michael show yesterday.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on March 27, 2013, 12:15:32 PM
Whoa.

I wonder just how big her boobs will get by the time she's 9 months.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: SamV on March 27, 2013, 12:19:49 PM
Kim was the lead guest on Live with Kelly and Michael yesterday (3/26) to promote the new Tyler Perry movie (Temptation) that she's in.

I was having breakfast when I saw Kim walk out on set in that belted maternity dress of hers, which seems to be a mash-up between a baby-doll and a pinafore. Anyway my jaw dropped as I watched her walking right towards the camera. Her boobs were huge! :o 8)

She mentioned during the interview she's 6 months in to her pregnancy and has gained like 20 pounds, and may end up gaining a total of about 30 pounds like her sister. With what she wore I couldn't see her baby bump, but from what I was seeing (starring at :-[) it looks like more than a little of that weight gain went right to her boobs. ::)

Here's another pic of Kim in that outfit before the show, but believe me neither of these pics do justice to what I saw. :-*

Sam "first Christina H in a belted dress, and now Kim; I say more dresses need belts" V ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 28, 2013, 03:48:00 AM
She looks luscious. If she wasn't already preggers, I'd knock her up again :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 29, 2013, 02:04:01 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on March 29, 2013, 02:34:36 AM
I do not think she can see over them ;).

Agent "300 till 7K!" Dee
8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Offline on March 29, 2013, 01:16:17 PM
Oh, those boobs...
http://youtube.googleapis.com/v/cSBcF0whubQ
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Maski on March 29, 2013, 01:50:40 PM
 :-*

Bigger and Bigger....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on March 30, 2013, 12:24:21 AM
Oh, those boobs...
http://youtube.googleapis.com/v/cSBcF0whubQ

That was so so nice.  Thanks
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 30, 2013, 02:16:07 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 30, 2013, 02:44:14 AM
Oh God, even though she isn't trying to be, that image is sooooo hot.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on March 30, 2013, 03:07:06 AM
:-*

Bigger and Bigger....

I found some video of her in that outfit.  GIF time :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Cris_H on March 30, 2013, 01:43:46 PM
:-*

Bigger and Bigger....

I don't love Kim Kardashian's personality or voice, but I've always thought she was a beautiful looking woman.

These pix, however, are much more than just beautiful: her hair and face look so awesome and her bigger boobs are amazing.  She looks ultra-hot in these pix, to me.

The more anyone posts of her recent appearances, the happier I'll be.  And like many of you, I love her bigger butt, too!  :D

Thanks guys, for postin' 'em!  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on March 30, 2013, 02:24:06 PM
I agree with Chris, there is NO denying she is a VERY attractive looking woman, she has that exotic hotness easy she is the hottest of the K girls no doubt.

AD
8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Cris_H on April 01, 2013, 10:27:40 PM
^I never understood why there are Kardashians (plural).  Kim is the only one who's hot.  NONE of the others interests me AT ALL.

Except, perhaps, Kim's mom.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: AgentDee on April 01, 2013, 11:41:34 PM
well the one sister I think Kourtney is pretty good looking its the 3rd one Khloe (what is up with those damn K names) that is like a big WTF at times when I see pics of her :P.

AD
8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 02, 2013, 10:22:17 AM
Here's a nice side shot.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: trukbutz on April 02, 2013, 11:19:24 AM
I hope that growth is permanent...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: luvdemwhoppers on April 02, 2013, 12:16:04 PM
broad in the beam, I like that. 8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: GS_Warrior on April 04, 2013, 02:37:49 PM
Haven't contributed in a while, so here ya go.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: colt13 on April 04, 2013, 06:18:06 PM
Haven't contributed in a while, so here ya go.

Nice. She is constantly covered on the gossip blogs, and her pics get better every day.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 06, 2013, 02:06:23 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on April 07, 2013, 11:34:53 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 11, 2013, 08:30:21 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on April 11, 2013, 10:28:32 PM
well the one sister I think Kourtney is pretty good looking its the 3rd one Khloe (what is up with those damn K names) that is like a big WTF at times when I see pics of her :P.

AD
8)

Have you seen the latest pix of Khloe?  She's trimmed down and is lookin' pretty hot, in my opinion, 'though Cris still doesn't like her face.  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DJPFC on April 11, 2013, 10:30:43 PM
My wife recently went to a party where Kim happened to make an appearance.  She came home and couldn't stop talking about the size of her ass.  It was apparently stunning for all who were there who viewed it.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on April 11, 2013, 10:54:45 PM
My wife recently went to a party where Kim happened to make an appearance.  She came home and couldn't stop talking about the size of her ass.  It was apparently stunning for all who were there who viewed it.

I believe it!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Demon on April 11, 2013, 10:55:29 PM
My wife recently went to a party where Kim happened to make an appearance.  She came home and couldn't stop talking about the size of her ass.  It was apparently stunning for all who were there who viewed it.

so let me get this right. Your wife is insanely jealous of a certain **29**'s backside and or was snickering that her back side was nowhere near the size of a certain **29**.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on April 11, 2013, 11:01:25 PM
I thought DJPFC was quite clear. His wife attended a party, saw Kim Kardasian and was stunned that such a small woman (5' 2" )  now has a huge ass due to weight gain from pregnancy. Kim has gotten bigger / fatter everywhere and it shows. She already had a large ass at her normal, slim self, now she has a butt that would make a tugboat proud.  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 12, 2013, 03:31:39 AM
...and you know this, maaaaaaaan!

</Chris Tucker voice>
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 13, 2013, 12:54:32 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: milom on April 13, 2013, 01:33:48 AM
How often do you get to watch social/sexual/fashion mores pivot in real time?  It wasn't such a long time ago that white chicks were skewered in rap videos being disgusted by a big ass.  It's a fascinating study in how trends in what is desirable in a woman are shaped by society.  There were relatively slim women with big asses before Kim K hit the scene.  It wasn't until she was a number one name in class and fashion in a three quarter profile pose that suddenly it was OK to fully appreciate a big fat ass.

What are we to make of a growing trend of white Miami dilettantes with hydrogel injections in their butt cheeks?  You can spend a couple minutes cruising WorldStarCandy.com and count a shockingly high number of gigantic butts sitting on skinny legs that biology suggests is highly unlikely to be natural, and incredibly unlikely in the growing number of models out there.  How to explain this except to suggest that starting with Jennifer Lopez, and culminating with Kim Kardashian it is now increasingly fashionable to have increasingly big, increasingly fake asses.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUpUa3_N9hg

That's Bianca King, and she's hardly unique.  The only way she stands out is that she has a video spreading around the internet getting thousands of hits and isn't confined to obscure twitter pics.  

I want to emphasize that I don't think the appreciation of a large ass is actually a new thing.  I want to emphasize the fact that it's NEWLY the object of admiration among white, wealthy, "traditional" women.  It may be culturally insensitive, but as I pointed out, just over 20 years ago it was taken for granted that a valley girl considered the kind of woman Sir Mix a Lot admired really gross and obscene.  Now, that same girl associates that sexual characteristic with Kim Kardashian, a public figure of fashion, wealth and class.  A big FAKE ass is now desirable in the same way big fake tits are desirable.  What some women want is to be talked about like a pregnant, big assed Kim K at a party is talked about.

If I'm not phrasing this very well I apologize.  I'm assuming quite a bit, and generalizing of course.  But I'm 30 years old, and I remember when the very idea of what I'm assuming is a party somewhere in Orange County, with what I'm assuming is a majority of white women, admiring an unusually large Armenian ass is completely fucking insane.  It wouldn't have happened 10 years ago.  And 10 years ago if plastic surgeons had been offering to inject junk into women's trunks there'd be no money in it.  Now there is.  And I don't need to wonder why.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on April 15, 2013, 04:04:03 PM
...Now, that same girl associates that sexual characteristic with Kim Kardashian, a public figure of fashion, wealth and class.  

A big FAKE ass is now desirable in the same way big fake tits are desirable...

Just wanted to point out a couple of instances where I personally disagree with your statement.

In no way has Kim Kardashian (or any Kardashian for that matter) EVER been associated with 'class' by any stretch of the imagination. Public figure? Yes. Wealthy? Yes. Having actual class? Never... not even once. In fact, I'd be hard-pressed to come up with some other public figure off the top of my head that has demonstrably less 'class' than Kim.

Also, 'big fake tits' aren't necessarily 'desirable' above and beyond an equally impressive bosom that is all natural (to many men). It's simply that really large natural bosoms on slender attractive women aren't exactly super-common, so plenty of models, actresses and regular gals get implants since that's the only way they'll achieve that size.

Other than those two points, I generally agree with the gist of your post.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on April 16, 2013, 01:20:10 AM
Just wanted to point out a couple of instances where I personally disagree with your statement.
In no way has Kim Kardashian (or any Kardashian for that matter) EVER been associated with 'class' by any stretch of the imagination. Public figure? Yes. Wealthy? Yes. Having actual class? Never... not even once. In fact, I'd be hard-pressed to come up with some other public figure off the top of my head that has demonstrably less 'class' than Kim.


I definitely see what you mean, though I see a different kind of "class" at work here. While Kim is not "classy" by any stretch of the imagination, she has gained general mainstream acceptance (ass and all) even in spite of her reality-tv and sextape origins. You see her at charity events, doing interviews with Barbara Walters, and modeling high-end fashion (she was on the cover of W and Cosmo). You don't see Coco Austin or Nikki Minaj doing stuff like that. While she's definitely no J. Lo or Beyonce, the general public puts her closer to them than Honey Boo Boo.

She really has played a big role in classing up the "big ass" look, as opposed to it being merely a fetish piece for rap videos. Perhaps "class" was not the right word. Maybe "fashionable" is more accurate.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: milom on April 16, 2013, 02:58:15 AM
Just wanted to point out a couple of instances where I personally disagree with your statement.

In no way has Kim Kardashian (or any Kardashian for that matter) EVER been associated with 'class' by any stretch of the imagination. Public figure? Yes. Wealthy? Yes. Having actual class? Never... not even once. In fact, I'd be hard-pressed to come up with some other public figure off the top of my head that has demonstrably less 'class' than Kim.

Also, 'big fake tits' aren't necessarily 'desirable' above and beyond an equally impressive bosom that is all natural (to many men). It's simply that really large natural bosoms on slender attractive women aren't exactly super-common, so plenty of models, actresses and regular gals get implants since that's the only way they'll achieve that size.

Other than those two points, I generally agree with the gist of your post.

Class has lost it's traditional meaning, Palomine.  This isn't the 60's anymore when actresses could step out their door without pictures of their cellulite being sold to the highest bidder.  Jackie Onassis had class.  Elizabeth Taylor had class.  Gwyneth Paltrow has class.  They're also recluses.  Their images were ruthlessly stage managed on the rare occasions when they were forced to emerge.

This is a new time, where information flows are moving at the speed of fiber optic cable and they're multi tiered, where perception exists entirely within the present moment.  To dwell on events that occurred even yesterday surrenders information occurring today.  Those ancient, classy women died before camera phones existed, in some cases before the sexual revolution even existed. 
 
What you consider "class", was a concept only formerly understood by ordinary people when they had good examples.  Inequality has been rising ever since then, and now today, the closest most under 40 can even come to conceiving of "class" is a well dressed beautiful woman whose wedding cost 17 million dollars and is on the internet getting fucked in the ass by a rapper named Ray J.  Your idea of class and fame are like oil and water.  It's much simpler now.  Kim Kardashian goes to all the most exotic locations in the world, and wears all the most expensive clothes, and she never looks shitty, ever.  What word would you put there instead of class?  Stylish?  Pretty?  Hot?  Nouveau riche? 

It may stretch your imagination, but I assure you, this is the era in which you live.  It gets farther from the ideal all the time.  So I stand by my usage of the word, but I do respect your comment on it, and the other thing.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on April 16, 2013, 12:49:11 PM
Kim Kardashian goes to all the most exotic locations in the world, and wears all the most expensive clothes, and she never looks shitty, ever.

Though seemingly devoid of talent, she is wealthy and that affords her the activities/attributes that you enumerate above. None of which has anything at all to do with 'class' ...by any definition new or old. Being famous for simply being famous, or wearing pricey fashions, driving expensive cars, carousing in fashionable locations also has nothing to do with class.

Even in this 24-hour news cycle/tabloid journalism/**29** obsessed age in which we live, class exists. It involves adult behavior, treating others with respect, exercising self restraint and other qualities not rewarded with paid club appearances. From what I've seen (believe me, no more than I have to) Kim Kardashian (and to a lesser extent her entire family) appears to be entirely devoid of those qualities, and thus, without class.

Fame isn't class. Wealth isn't class. Looking fashionable isn't class.

Kardashian is not, and has never been, classy in any sense of the word.

JMHO.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on April 16, 2013, 11:15:38 PM
Classy or not...

I'd.

Without a second thought.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MobyNick on April 17, 2013, 12:08:46 AM
Though seemingly devoid of talent, she is wealthy and that affords her the activities/attributes that you enumerate above. None of which has anything at all to do with 'class' ...by any definition new or old. Being famous for simply being famous, or wearing pricey fashions, driving expensive cars, carousing in fashionable locations also has nothing to do with class.

Even in this 24-hour news cycle/tabloid journalism/**29** obsessed age in which we live, class exists. It involves adult behavior, treating others with respect, exercising self restraint and other qualities not rewarded with paid club appearances. From what I've seen (believe me, no more than I have to) Kim Kardashian (and to a lesser extent her entire family) appears to be entirely devoid of those qualities, and thus, without class.

Fame isn't class. Wealth isn't class. Looking fashionable isn't class.

Kardashian is not, and has never been, classy in any sense of the word.

JMHO.

Troof
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 17, 2013, 03:53:06 AM
I disagree with you, milom. "Class" has not lost its meaning. I agree with both Palomine and with Ninjamohawk :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 18, 2013, 09:24:14 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: PregNut on April 18, 2013, 09:29:42 PM
Classy or not...

I'd.

Without a second thought.

I wouldn't.

Even considering her current condition.

And that's saying something.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Dr_Fashizzle on April 18, 2013, 09:39:16 PM
:)
OK. Why did I see the right half of that pic and think Philadelphia Experiment...  ??? ??? ???
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on April 18, 2013, 09:44:33 PM
I wouldn't.

Even considering her current condition.

And that's saying something.

*shrug* to each their own. I don't know thing 1 about her but I like her looks. Pure.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 18, 2013, 10:17:59 PM
And here she is from the front, in those "Philadelphia Experiment" photos that tdotter just posted :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: trukbutz on April 19, 2013, 06:13:00 PM


Fame isn't class. Wealth isn't class. Looking fashionable isn't class.

Kardashian is not, and has never been, classy in any sense of the word.

JMHO.

I categorically refuse to watch any and all shows in which this money/fame hungry family chooses to host or participate, first and foremost due to the vapid and soulless Kris Jenner.  Even Robert would roll over in his grave if he knew the extent to which Kris is **32** herself and his daughters, and Bruce is both willingly oblivious and too spineless to resist her.  Kim's curves (and sometimes Kourtney's) are the only redeeming qualities of this family, but only if they SHUT UP.  Although ABC continues to foist them on Jimmy Kimmel, at least he gets to make fun of them for the desperate, talentless talking heads they are.  This is one of those cases where the paparazzi and their quarry completely deserve one another.

JMHO
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: milom on April 19, 2013, 11:22:49 PM

JMHO

You're quite wrapped up in the story of their lives for someone who goes out of his way to avoid them.  It's amazing how much vitriolic hate they inspire.  I honestly don't see a shred of difference between the Kardashians and the Tuttle family and other dudes that build cars and bikes on TV, or the bunch of dudes that sell fish tanks, or the duck guys, or the Amish guys, or high flying real estate agents showing mansions or trying to hook two rich people up.

Well there is one difference.  Maybe you can spot it.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on April 19, 2013, 11:58:34 PM
I wanted to read these comments all week, but have been too busy going to classes.  Now, I can finally put in my double coppers.  ;D

Jackie Onassis had class.  Elizabeth Taylor had class.  Gwyneth Paltrow has class.

Those ancient, classy women died before camera phones existed, in some cases before the sexual revolution even existed.  

Just gotta point some things out here: Gwyneth Paltrow is still alive, last time Iron Man checked, anyway.  Not sure about camera phones existing in the early 90s (Jackie died in '94, I believe), but Liz Taylor died in 2011, and I'm pretty sure camera phones were around way back then.   :P  And all of them lived either after or through the sexual revolution.  I understand that you probably meant Liz Taylor & Jackie O's heyday, and yes, of course cell phone cameras were a thing of the future in those days, but both were very much in the public eye during and after the sexual revolution.  You are correct about the three women having class, 'though there are definitely times when Gwyneth does not.
 
Kim Kardashian goes to all the most exotic locations in the world, and wears all the most expensive clothes, and she never looks shitty, ever.  What word would you put there instead of class?  Stylish?  Pretty?  Hot?  Nouveau riche?  

I found these statements amusing.  I would definitely use the words "stylish", "pretty", "hot" or "nouveau riche" instead of "class" as it pertains to Miss Kim.

Now, having said that, I must say that milom is also correct...  

According to the World English Dictionary:
9.    a. informal  excellence or elegance, esp in dress, design, or behaviour: "that girl's got class"

I would stipulate that Ms. Kardashian shows excellence & often elegance in how she dresses.  However, her behavior shows no sign of elegance ever.  

I tend to think of someone who has class in reference to their behavior, but I suppose one can have class as to how one dresses, but that's as far as Miz K goes, I'm afraid, and sometimes, her taste isn't particularly classy at all.  Just my tenth of a dime.
 





Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: milom on April 20, 2013, 01:03:35 AM
I would stipulate that Ms. Kardashian shows excellence & often elegance in how she dresses.  However, her behavior shows no sign of elegance ever.  

I tend to think of someone who has class in reference to their behavior, but I suppose one can have class as to how one dresses, but that's as far as Miz K goes, I'm afraid, and sometimes, her taste isn't particularly classy at all.  Just my tenth of a dime.

I was really hoping the takeaway from my original post would be more of a discussion about whether or not ass implants/injections are a serious trend, and if so does Kim Kardashian have anything to do with it.  So far, everyone wants to focus on Kim's status as a dirty whore whose existence is a blight on all our lives.

What behavior are you guys even referencing?  Remind me again why she's so trashy?  Is it the sex tape? 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rentahero on April 20, 2013, 03:25:45 AM
Though seemingly devoid of talent, she is wealthy and that affords her the activities/attributes that you enumerate above. None of which has anything at all to do with 'class' ...by any definition new or old. Being famous for simply being famous, or wearing pricey fashions, driving expensive cars, carousing in fashionable locations also has nothing to do with class.

Even in this 24-hour news cycle/tabloid journalism/**29** obsessed age in which we live, class exists. It involves adult behavior, treating others with respect, exercising self restraint and other qualities not rewarded with paid club appearances. From what I've seen (believe me, no more than I have to) Kim Kardashian (and to a lesser extent her entire family) appears to be entirely devoid of those qualities, and thus, without class.

Fame isn't class. Wealth isn't class. Looking fashionable isn't class.

Kardashian is not, and has never been, classy in any sense of the word.

JMHO.

What would you say you've seen that Kim Kardashian has done that is particularly rude or distasteful?  Kourtney is a spacey weirdo (but not classless either imo), and Khloe is a loudmouth, but Kim is pretty bland personality-wise.  
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 20, 2013, 03:52:53 AM
I was really hoping the takeaway from my original post would be more of a discussion about whether or not ass implants/injections are a serious trend, and if so does Kim Kardashian have anything to do with it.  So far, everyone wants to focus on Kim's status as a dirty whore whose existence is a blight on all our lives.

What behavior are you guys even referencing?  Remind me again why she's so trashy?  Is it the sex tape?  
Yes,when I'm reading almost weekly of a woman dying from getting butt injections by non-medical people then it's a serious trend.It's only been maybe 4 or 5 years ago,I recall first reading a story on that subject.
I would definitely say that Jennifer Lopez started the trend of women wanting bigger butts.She was in the public eye way before Kim Kardashian.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gOOber on April 20, 2013, 05:11:27 AM
Pardon me while I indulge in some eye candy.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 20, 2013, 06:23:47 AM
Our great national nightmare is now over.

The Sun: "Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries' divorce case settled"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 23, 2013, 02:01:06 AM
Meanwhile...

"Pity a pregnant Kim Kardashian, readers.

The reality star opened up on last night's Ryan Seacrest with The Kardashians: An E! News Presentation (the actual title!) and admitted that expecting a baby isn't just another income source that results in tabloid covers and diet deals.

It can actually hurt!

"It’s just really painful everywhere," Kim said on the ridiculous special, while Khloe Kardashian elaborated:

“Her back hurts, her breasts hurt, her stomach hurts, her feet hurt, her head hurts, her eyes hurt, her nails hurt.”

Fortunately, her F___book feed is A-OK and she's been able to keep followers updated on her condition...."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 23, 2013, 09:50:03 AM
That's Rachel Roy beside her.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 26, 2013, 12:19:12 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 29, 2013, 08:46:06 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on May 04, 2013, 12:44:23 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 06, 2013, 07:28:42 AM
Showing off her bump nicely.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on May 06, 2013, 09:46:17 PM
I'm enjoying the projection contest between her boobs and belly.

Rob "teh bewbz ftw" Classact
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on May 07, 2013, 02:24:33 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on May 07, 2013, 07:44:08 PM
In a -slightly- loud dress..
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gonZo on May 09, 2013, 06:07:28 PM
Bump  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on May 09, 2013, 10:02:34 PM
In a -slightly- loud dress..

WHAT?  Sorry, Carl, I couldn't hear you over the dress.  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on May 09, 2013, 10:16:41 PM
In a -slightly- loud dress..

How cute, she's wearing my grandmother's couch!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: FourHooksPlus on May 09, 2013, 10:51:09 PM
Bump  ;D

(http://forum-img.pinside.com/pinball/forum/?bb_attachments=435109&bbat=46513&inline)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on May 10, 2013, 01:24:19 AM
The right one is obviously a morph but still.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on May 10, 2013, 10:28:34 PM
How cute, she's wearing my grandmother's couch!

Her ass is so big its the only thing that fits now...  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on May 11, 2013, 01:49:40 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on May 11, 2013, 05:33:06 PM
Showing off her bump nicely.

A different angle from the same place.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ge_medic on May 11, 2013, 10:42:13 PM
Not Sure if this one was posted.....
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: armydude on May 12, 2013, 06:59:31 AM
A different angle from the same place.


I think her back side is growing faster than her frontside
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: odbjbg on May 13, 2013, 01:11:22 PM
It's very rare that I find Kim hot in the least... But those preggo bikini pics are quite impressive.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: doctorx33 on May 13, 2013, 06:37:36 PM

I think her back side is growing faster than her frontside

yeah, when she walks into a room her ass gets there about ten minutes after her tits do.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 17, 2013, 04:18:41 AM
Here's one from before her pregnancy.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on May 17, 2013, 04:27:20 PM
.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: lactose_tolerant on May 18, 2013, 09:21:58 AM
my goodness

lactose 'wonders if coco's would do the same' tolerant

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Offline on May 18, 2013, 09:46:44 AM
my goodness

lactose 'wonders if coco's would do the same' tolerant



My goodness, indeed.  I'd like to dance around with her in all positions and pass out in pure bliss.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DJPFC on May 18, 2013, 11:36:56 AM
This was a much better depiction and comparison of that outfit. 
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on May 18, 2013, 02:38:49 PM
This was a much better depiction and comparison of that outfit. 

Shamu wishes she had 'dem curves.

my goodness

lactose 'wonders if coco's would do the same' tolerant

I'd love to find out.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on May 18, 2013, 10:38:42 PM
This was a much better depiction and comparison of that outfit. 


That was such a cruel, mean spirited cutting remark and it was/is so fucking hilareous. Mammeister would be proud.  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on May 23, 2013, 10:41:08 PM
Today I saw some photos of her in a bikini while pregnant.  She still looks good.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on May 23, 2013, 11:46:45 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gOOber on June 07, 2013, 06:09:43 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on June 22, 2013, 01:34:10 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on June 22, 2013, 02:34:55 AM
Can't wait until she loses the baby weight (but hopefully not the knockers)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on July 18, 2013, 10:09:08 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on July 20, 2013, 03:32:24 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on October 03, 2013, 12:26:35 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on October 06, 2013, 12:17:23 AM
:)

that size kim was the best
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on October 17, 2013, 09:59:02 AM
New picture
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: k01 on October 17, 2013, 10:36:46 AM
Just stunning!  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 17, 2013, 11:06:19 AM
Not a fan of her as a blonde, but that ass is still on point :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rentahero on October 17, 2013, 04:55:58 PM
Jeez, she's out of the "big for hollywood" sizes, and into true mammoth internet donk.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 22, 2013, 11:47:56 PM
Bleacher Report: "Kanye West Proposes to Kim Kardashian at AT&T Park in San Francisco"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on October 23, 2013, 09:25:34 AM
"Yo Kim I wuz thinkin like you know I'm totally out of my fucking mind and think the world revolves around me and y'know like you're brain-numbingly insane and self-centered so why don't you marry me? You gotta change yo name to South tho and take my last name but I'm a genius so it's okay."

"Okay sounds good."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: DJPFC on October 23, 2013, 12:23:26 PM
"Yo Kim I wuz thinkin like you know I'm totally out of my fucking mind and think the world revolves around me and y'know like you're brain-numbingly insane and self-centered so why don't you marry me? You gotta change yo name to South tho and take my last name but I'm a genius so it's okay."

"Okay sounds good."


LOL.  Friggin' hilarious.  I'm sure the reality of the proposal was not to far off from this. ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 23, 2013, 01:12:43 PM
I think Kanye's heart is in the right place...even if he totally contradicted himself by presenting her with a 15-carat diamond engagement ring...I guess he forgot all about his impassioned lyrics and video for "Diamonds from Sierra Leone"...oh well. I guess he figures he'd better put a lock on that bum of hers, especially now that he's successfully knocked her up.

I wish those two crazy lovebirds all the best. Honestly.

-- TheZookie "third marriage's the charm?" 007
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on October 23, 2013, 01:16:07 PM
Actually the proposal was probably between their agents. "How can we keep these two on the covers of magazines that depressed housewives read?"

"Hmm. Let's have them get married."

"Sound good, sounds good. We should draw it out though. Leak that Kanye bought a ring, let the speculation tide rise and fall. Then leak a proposal, let that ride and finally a bunch of drama leading up to a ludicrously expensive wedding. We can let that gather dust until they become irrelevant and then we'll have some divorce drama."

"Sounds good, I'll write the checks. Call Us Weekly and The National Inquirer."
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gOOber on October 23, 2013, 02:44:51 PM
^
This! ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: bignatslover on October 24, 2013, 11:14:29 AM
"Yo Kim
Awesome.  You know he was **101** by DAT ACE.   Even if its starting point was from a place of wrong, I wish them THE BEST!  Mm hmm -this may be alcoh1 fueled but I want to see her happy


Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: thesarge on October 25, 2013, 07:30:50 AM
They are made for each other.

One is a prissy, ditzy, fame whore who thinks the world revolves around them.

And the other one is Kim Kardashian.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on October 25, 2013, 05:03:34 PM
*rimshot*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on October 28, 2013, 12:29:31 AM
Awesome.  You know he was **101** by DAT ACE.   Even if its starting point was from a place of wrong, I wish them THE BEST!  Mm hmm -this may be alcoh1 fueled but I want to see her happy

"Well, yeah, you’ve gotta lock that down!"
(http://www.dormdelicious.com/images/meet_the_veals.jpg)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on November 20, 2013, 05:59:43 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ltfields on November 22, 2013, 01:51:09 PM
From his new video.  I won't comment on the song or the video quality, but those lights and shadows are very strategically placed...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 12, 2013, 05:03:12 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 12, 2013, 08:13:18 AM
Very nice.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rad on December 12, 2013, 08:26:01 AM
South Park did an episode on her and Photoshoping yesterday. Funny.

Mod edit: I saw it too and thought is was poignant (Wendy's dilema about Photoshopping). I was waiting to actually see South Park's interpretation of Kim K (I was expecting something along the lines of prior episode appearances of Snooki, Jennifer Lopez, etc...) but they never showed her. Perhaps there are some things too awful even for Matt Stone and Trey Parker. ;) -Palomine
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on December 12, 2013, 04:32:07 PM
She looked better before
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 13, 2013, 08:36:39 AM
Very nice.

Also, as I have learned this morning, airbrushed in that photograph. Apparently, Kim insisted on it.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on December 21, 2013, 02:18:11 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 24, 2013, 05:31:42 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on January 10, 2014, 01:57:17 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Reaver on January 11, 2014, 07:43:51 AM
Not the best face shot but a nice one of the boobs.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on January 12, 2014, 03:41:20 PM
And that ASS!  :P

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: FourHooksPlus on January 12, 2014, 04:49:21 PM
And that ASS!  :P

(http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/577/4si4.jpg) (https://imageshack.com/i/g14si4j)

DAYUM.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gOOber on January 12, 2014, 05:43:54 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on January 13, 2014, 01:49:40 AM
And that ASS!  :P

Yeezus!

Rob "see what I did there?" Classact
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 13, 2014, 01:47:03 PM
Good one, rob :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on January 24, 2014, 01:06:23 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 24, 2014, 01:27:54 AM
Did anyone catch her appearance on Jimmy Kimmel?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 29, 2014, 05:55:53 AM
Apparently she had a letdown response while the Keeping Up with the Kardashians cameras were rolling...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 13, 2014, 11:48:26 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 14, 2014, 01:26:07 AM
It's a booty-ful day in the neighborhood, a booty-ful day in the neighbor-- would you be mine? Won't you be mine?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: trukbutz on March 13, 2014, 02:56:43 PM
Anything you can wear, I can wear Better...

Kim Kardashian Flaunts Major Cleavage, Models Same Black Cutout Bikini as Sister Kylie Jenner in Sexy Selfie: Picture

Hopefully someone will find a better quality pic than I did...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rad on March 13, 2014, 04:06:22 PM
Photoshop? If not damn looking good
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 14, 2014, 12:57:27 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gonZo on March 14, 2014, 08:25:49 AM
Photoshop? If not damn looking good

No photoshop.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rad on March 14, 2014, 10:21:29 AM
No photoshop.

Woohoo she is fine!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on March 14, 2014, 02:02:18 PM
Anything you can wear, I can wear Better...

Kim Kardashian Flaunts Major Cleavage, Models Same Black Cutout Bikini as Sister Kylie Jenner in Sexy Selfie: Picture

Hopefully someone will find a better quality pic than I did...

Seems to me she's getting a little insecure about her "competition"

But still....damn
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on March 17, 2014, 01:05:01 AM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 21, 2014, 01:32:21 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 11, 2014, 12:54:32 AM
New ass pictures
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 11, 2014, 01:04:52 AM
Epic ass!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Reaver on April 21, 2014, 08:53:27 AM
Poor woman, has been working hard to lose weight. Has lost 50lbs, none of it off her ass  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on April 21, 2014, 01:27:02 PM
Just imagine the inevitable weight bounce back, once that ass really starts growing...omg ;)

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 21, 2014, 10:18:29 PM
Who wore it best?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MaxiMoundsSexyBigTitsAndSexyBigAss on April 21, 2014, 10:57:20 PM
Nevermind -
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on April 22, 2014, 01:30:23 AM
Elke The Stallion's ass is bigger! :o

Then respectfully post it in her own thread - this thread is about Kim.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on April 22, 2014, 09:30:55 AM
Agreed, if we start putting pictures up of people to show size differences, it becomes a game of one up and we'll have pictures all over the place. For example I could've posted a pic that shows Pebblez is bigger, then three more posters come in and put theirs up and we get into a whole real vs. fake debate and BAM! Thread derailed.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on April 22, 2014, 12:37:03 PM
Kim Kardashian and "The View"

Oh what a view it is. 

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on May 19, 2014, 07:51:11 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 28, 2014, 12:32:39 AM
Here's wishing those lovebirds all the best!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on June 10, 2014, 09:49:38 PM
:)

O_O dat...dat ass
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Reaver on June 18, 2014, 10:46:54 PM
Make your butt implant jokes now
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: ozzalot on June 19, 2014, 10:16:06 AM
implants = true, but when you look at that ass at the right angle.....DAMN i just want to put my face in it and take take a bite!!

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on June 19, 2014, 11:25:40 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on June 20, 2014, 11:58:17 AM
Nipples
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Cris_H on June 20, 2014, 01:08:23 PM
Who wore it best?

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on June 25, 2014, 08:35:07 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on June 28, 2014, 02:32:41 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on July 05, 2014, 01:55:44 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gOOber on July 07, 2014, 09:49:44 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on August 06, 2014, 12:04:43 PM
She wore this bustier on the Jimmy Kimmel show this past Monday.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on August 07, 2014, 11:51:19 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pio_z on August 10, 2014, 03:55:52 AM
Her ass should grow bigger and bigger - it's all the time incredible
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on August 14, 2014, 10:17:12 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on August 19, 2014, 09:04:50 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on August 20, 2014, 11:13:14 PM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on August 23, 2014, 01:08:57 PM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on August 29, 2014, 12:53:15 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 03, 2014, 12:20:23 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on September 03, 2014, 05:44:23 AM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on September 04, 2014, 11:36:14 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on September 05, 2014, 12:45:27 AM
Kim Kardashian

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on September 17, 2014, 05:44:14 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on September 18, 2014, 12:53:32 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on September 18, 2014, 03:18:37 AM
Did you hear the one about the Bond girl and gold paint? Well here's a safe silver.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gonZo on September 20, 2014, 10:45:46 PM
Two posts have been removed because the attached photo was apparently stolen (hacked) property, so it's considered private information released without the permission of the subject. These posts were not rule violations, but were removed to shield the posters and forum from legal liability.
-moderator
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on September 29, 2014, 10:35:32 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on September 29, 2014, 08:37:24 PM
:)


I love golden apples!  That makes me hungry.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on October 01, 2014, 03:19:26 AM
I wish the photographer that was taking this picture was kneeling down like this other guy was here.It would have been the perfect side shot of her ass.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on October 07, 2014, 11:26:00 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 08, 2014, 01:50:35 PM
Most excellent...but Khloe's fighting back.

InTouch: "Khloé Kardashian Has Officially Out-Bootyed Kim Kardashian"

It’s a day to go down in history.

Khloé Kardashian’s butt may have just gotten even bigger than her sister Kim’s.

The younger of the two reality stars stepped out in Los Angeles yesterday, Oct. 6, and proved that she truly does have the most junk in her trunk!

Of course, Khloé has been hard at work perfectly sculpting those buns—often posting Instagram videos of the multiple rounds of squats she does in the gym.

“Squat!!!!” she captioned the photo below. “Because no one ever wrote a song about a small ass.”

(http://photos-d.ak.instagram.com/hphotos-ak-xfa1/10691618_927264403953555_1276273286_n.jpg)

Well, we can’t argue with that logic.

And it just goes to show you: Work hard enough and you’ll be kicking your sister’s butt—literally—in no time!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on October 08, 2014, 03:58:22 PM
The ball is back in Kim's court now -- gawds, I can't wait to see her response!!!  :-*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 12, 2014, 02:47:44 AM
Kim's outgunned by Khloe's superior back firepower! Pow!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on October 22, 2014, 11:56:17 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on October 25, 2014, 01:32:29 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on November 10, 2014, 04:03:32 PM
Guess its in the jeans/genes...  ???
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 12, 2014, 12:52:43 AM
This ass is such a thing of beauty. I can't stop looking at it. It's so...beautiful...  :'( :'( :'(
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gonZo on November 12, 2014, 07:01:16 AM
And, turning the other cheek...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on November 12, 2014, 09:52:24 PM
'Bout Damm time...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 12, 2014, 09:59:47 PM
Is so beautiful!

(eyes well up with tears)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: gonZo on November 13, 2014, 07:28:50 AM
Let's not forget this one...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on November 13, 2014, 08:09:34 PM
A wallpaper someone graciously made... :-*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Nimrod on November 14, 2014, 01:04:18 PM
I have never found Kim Kardashian appealing. In fact I really have never paid much attention to her.
One aspect that this thread has made me aware of is just how massive her buttocks is. I am surprised.
Granted, she does place emphasis on it, but the shear volume is a bit of a shock. It is a very big rump on her frame.

This did motivate me to try and determine her proportions and of course anything on the internet is all over the place.
The numbers are very mixed and also increase over time. However there was one consistency.
Her hip measurements run at +6" of her bust. This is a large difference and makes her a distinct pear shape.
Her waist appeared to hold constant at around -8" her bust which again makes her a pear or rectangle.
The closest 2014 average sizes would work out to be 34d-26-40 at an average height of 5'-2 1/2" (159cm) and average weight of 139 lbs (63kg)
Interestingly this worked out to be a standard BMI 25.0 which is just at "overweight" - which I totally believe.

I would wager that her Armenian and German ancestors contribute to her basic body shape with the Irish helping her bustline and face shape.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Captain Nemo on November 15, 2014, 07:29:13 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on November 15, 2014, 09:14:32 AM
8)


Now she has the proper counter balance for her butt  ;D. By the way, I love your morphs on the Users Gallery, well done.  :) How about another of Beshine on her thread, please ?  :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pilotblaze on November 15, 2014, 12:43:45 PM
I seem to recall there was maybe more than a little controversy about whether she had butt implant augmentation.

Is there a general consensus out there about this now?

-D'Artagnian
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Captain Nemo on November 15, 2014, 01:25:46 PM

Now she has the proper counter balance for her butt  ;D. By the way, I love your morphs on the Users Gallery, well done.  :) How about another of Beshine on her thread, please ?  :)
OK, I post one of Beshine but it may be repost. Now I am wanting to play whit Kim  8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rad on November 15, 2014, 06:03:07 PM
I seem to recall there was maybe more than a little controversy about whether she had butt implant augmentation.

Is there a general consensus out there about this now?

-D'Artagnian


No the magazine says they're photoshopped

@TMZ: Those "unedited" photos of Kim Kardashian's ass are FAKE... but still hilarious http://t.co/M0lfIEyAOA http://t.co/H5HYkLeyf9
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on November 15, 2014, 08:48:40 PM
OK, I post one of Beshine but it may be repost. Now I am wanting to play whit Kim  8)


Thanks for the Beshine morph. Excellent work on Kim. :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Captain Nemo on November 16, 2014, 12:15:40 PM
Thank You.  One more (last)  8)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on November 19, 2014, 02:22:58 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pilotblaze on November 19, 2014, 04:46:55 AM
No the magazine says they're photoshopped

@TMZ: Those "unedited" photos of Kim Kardashian's ass are FAKE... but still hilarious http://t.co/M0lfIEyAOA http://t.co/H5HYkLeyf9

I'm sorry, I guess I wasn't specific in my comment.

I meant in the general, historic sense - did she ever have butt implants done.  I wasn't referring to these recent photos by themselves...

Butt - the observations about this photoset in question are certainly notable and useful.  :)

-D'Artagnian
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Captain Nemo on November 20, 2014, 08:42:39 AM
Thank You.  One more (last)  8)
Okay, I said last, but I am not happy whit last morph kkcover2_No.jpg, so I redo it on different version (posted wallpaper):
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 20, 2014, 07:40:33 PM
I'm sorry, I guess I wasn't specific in my comment.

I meant in the general, historic sense - did she ever have butt implants done.  I wasn't referring to these recent photos by themselves...

Butt - the observations about this photoset in question are certainly notable and useful.  :)

-D'Artagnian


Her butt in the photoset were Photoshopped, but not to make it bigger. Knowing the oeuvre of the photographer would prove that to be the case.

As for "did she have butt implants?" there's been a lot of arguments pro and con. She even went so far as to have an ultrasound of her butt done on an episode of Keeping Up With The Karadashians once, a la Jana Defi and Alexis Love. I personally believe that that butt of hers is God-given. The only people who can tell you for sure are the men she has **84** with. Sadly, I am not yet among that number.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on November 21, 2014, 07:47:55 PM
I'm convinced she's had a few Brazilian buttlifts in her life. I wouldn't be surprised if sister Kourtney had one herself
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on November 22, 2014, 05:36:07 AM
I'm convinced she's had a few Brazilian buttlifts in her life. I wouldn't be surprised if sister Kourtney had one herself

Kourtney, I don't see it. But Khloe....  ???
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: mastert on November 23, 2014, 10:24:06 AM
Oops. I meant Khloe. Good catch
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on November 26, 2014, 02:22:25 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on November 26, 2014, 10:25:08 PM
Kim has a letdown.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 23, 2014, 09:55:34 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on December 29, 2014, 01:04:03 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on January 11, 2015, 03:22:02 PM
 ??? ??? ???
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on January 16, 2015, 01:18:04 AM
??? ??? ???

Jesus, that thing is amazing! I want to take a large bite, then several more.

...then store the rest, and take several more bites when I'm no longer full.

Rob "that ass is making me stiuped" Classact
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on January 21, 2015, 09:57:17 AM
Lol at the security guy trying to check out her ass!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Affenmensch on January 21, 2015, 11:27:47 AM
This ass is such a thing of beauty. I can't stop looking at it. It's so...beautiful...  :'( :'( :'(

this is Hen Tal copying her paper mag shoot
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on February 03, 2015, 05:02:03 PM
Lol at the security guy trying to check out her ass!

Can't blame any of them for that! :)

Speaking of which, did you see the Super Bowl commercial for T-Mobile's Data Ass, er, I mean, Data Stash (https://www.youtube.com/v/ZTwzsV3I3OQ&rel=0)?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 07, 2015, 04:18:04 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on February 11, 2015, 12:50:27 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on February 11, 2015, 01:29:28 PM
 8)


Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on February 11, 2015, 01:31:45 PM
Another from Prada shoot
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on February 12, 2015, 05:16:48 PM
She certainly has no problem doing full frontal anymore...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: element on February 13, 2015, 10:27:43 PM
But it's for Fashion, Art... Shoes... Paris... etc etc :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on February 18, 2015, 09:10:31 PM
more  :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Palomine on February 21, 2015, 01:43:13 PM
Not Kim K. but a Brazzer's actress emulating her recent "Break the Internet" shoot, but with hardcore. I don't know which actress this is, but it shouldn't be too difficult to figure out if you're curious. Attached screencap shows sample clip stills in images 1, 3 and 4.

Screenshot from 2015-02-21 10:41:12
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rad on February 21, 2015, 03:28:03 PM
Not Kim K. but a Brazzer's actress emulating her recent "Break the Internet" shoot, but with hardcore. I don't know which actress this is, but it shouldn't be too difficult to figure out if you're curious. Attached screencap shows sample clip stills in images 1, 3 and 4.

Screenshot from 2015-02-21 10:41:12


The butt shot is Nikki Benz. Benz mafia!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Real on February 21, 2015, 05:35:19 PM
Not Kim K. but a Brazzer's actress emulating her recent "Break the Internet" shoot, but with hardcore. I don't know which actress this is, but it shouldn't be too difficult to figure out if you're curious. Attached screencap shows sample clip stills in images 1, 3 and 4.

Screenshot from 2015-02-21 10:41:12


Looks like that's Nikki Benz, in a change from her usual blonde locks.

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 17, 2015, 03:26:25 AM
She has 30 million Twitter followers now. In celebration, her husband released these photos on his Twitter feed.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on March 17, 2015, 03:33:24 AM
Are the blong hairs, her own hair bleached or is it a wig? Thoughts?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: trukbutz on March 17, 2015, 02:29:23 PM
Another of the twitter photos...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on March 21, 2015, 05:18:19 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on March 21, 2015, 07:27:15 AM
Holy....is the ass so phat it's making her jeans sheer now?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 21, 2015, 11:34:01 AM
Holy....is the ass so phat it's making her jeans sheer now?

Possibly! :)

Another of the Twitter photos:
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: T_Man on March 21, 2015, 12:18:31 PM
Making those jeans a little more sheer.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on March 21, 2015, 09:55:46 PM
Making those jeans a little more sheer.

Nice.  Just loving it.  Making me feel a bit cannibalistic.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Affenmensch on March 24, 2015, 12:04:50 PM
not sure if this one has been posted allready
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Cris_H on March 24, 2015, 07:28:27 PM
:)

 :o

Holy fucking shit.  That's crazy-lust...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on April 22, 2015, 07:42:02 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 22, 2015, 04:13:03 PM
Another one of the Twitter photos:
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on May 06, 2015, 07:15:29 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Cris_H on May 06, 2015, 09:36:00 AM
So, we're watching some magazine show like "Extra" or whatever, and a bit comes up about Kim, and Eliza says something about her not being very good looking. Now, I have yet to figure out Eliza's taste in women, sometimes she'll say someone is gorgeous and I'll agree, and sometimes she'll say someone isn't so hot and I'll agree occasionally. This time, however, I was stunned. I turned around and admitted I'm not the biggest fan of Kim, herself, and her voice I'm not fond of at all, but the girl's looks?  "Hun, whatever else you think about her, she's a knockout."

Oddly enough, I was not in he doghouse later that day.  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: chorizo on May 06, 2015, 10:38:32 AM
KK & jlo... Which you'd hit first?  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on May 06, 2015, 02:54:20 PM
Kim....even more extreme curves on a shorter frame = win :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Reaver on May 06, 2015, 06:30:56 PM
KK & jlo... Which you'd hit first?  :P

JLo
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on May 06, 2015, 08:52:19 PM
So, we're watching some magazine show like "Extra" or whatever, and a bit comes up about Kim, and Eliza says something about her not being very good looking. Now, I have yet to figure out Eliza's taste in women, sometimes she'll say someone is gorgeous and I'll agree, and sometimes she'll say someone isn't so hot and I'll agree occasionally. This time, however, I was stunned. I turned around and admitted I'm not the biggest fan of Kim, herself, and her voice I'm not fond of at all, but the girl's looks?  "Hun, whatever else you think about her, she's a knockout."

Oddly enough, I was not in he doghouse later that day.  :P


Obviously you were being tested and you passed. Now, if she starts feeding you Alpo ....  :(
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: lactose_tolerant on May 13, 2015, 10:56:55 AM
from latest porn parody - Kim K Fucks The Paparazzi ~

ms lela star

lactose 'hopes she does more parodies' tolerant
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on May 13, 2015, 05:47:31 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on May 13, 2015, 07:47:21 PM
^Thats a great shot!

She's basically fondling herself.  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on May 13, 2015, 07:49:19 PM

Obviously you were being tested and you passed. Now, if she starts feeding you Alpo ....  :(

No, not a test. He's entitled to his opinion, I guess, that's all.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Rentahero on May 13, 2015, 08:43:49 PM
I'm actually more into Khloe these days.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on May 13, 2015, 09:52:03 PM
See, I always thought Khloe was better looking.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 14, 2015, 06:15:26 AM
I've always liked Khloe. People are much too hard on her.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: andrat2000 on May 14, 2015, 06:56:13 AM
I've always liked Khloe. People are much too hard on her.

They could rub me both. In that case why should I matter. But bigger boobs would be appreciated.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on May 14, 2015, 01:27:57 PM
from latest porn parody - Kim K Fucks The Paparazzi ~

ms lela star

lactose 'hopes she does more parodies' tolerant

that was a good parody imo. definitely felt legit and she's sooooo sexy
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mr_Pickles on May 31, 2015, 10:23:50 PM
Good news football fans, she's reportedly preggers again
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: FourHooksPlus on May 31, 2015, 11:13:13 PM
As good as that news is, I wish Kanye would stop spawning...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mr_Pickles on May 31, 2015, 11:21:57 PM
As good as that news is, I wish Kanye would stop spawning...

Second!!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on June 13, 2015, 03:43:34 AM
New ass picture from yesterday.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Brahma on June 14, 2015, 08:08:24 AM
I've always liked Khloe. People are much too hard on her.

A nice booty--butter face--doesn't compare to her two sisters.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mr_Pickles on June 14, 2015, 08:27:34 AM
New ass picture from yesterday.

Dat ass doh  :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: FourHooksPlus on June 14, 2015, 10:51:43 PM
A nice booty--butter face--doesn't compare to her two sisters.

Butter face is kinda harsh. Each of the K sisters has her charms (personally I think they're all pretty...Khloe gets a bum wrap), but Kim is gorgeous no matter how you slice it...

bum wrap...see what i did there?  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: bffd on June 14, 2015, 11:06:06 PM
Butter face is kinda harsh. Each of the K sisters has her charms (personally I think they're all pretty...Khloe gets a bum wrap), but Kim is gorgeous no matter how you slice it...

bum wrap...see what i did there?  :P
.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on June 17, 2015, 05:18:46 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: robclassact on June 23, 2015, 10:28:51 PM
To quote--of all people--Kat Dennings in "2 Broke Girls" (https://www.youtube.com/embed/I7AXJqos_DA?hd=1?&autoplay=1):

"It almost huts to look at her."

Rob "though I'd say 'it' rather than 'her'" Classact
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on June 25, 2015, 11:12:27 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pilotblaze on June 25, 2015, 11:57:43 AM
Butter face is kinda harsh. Each of the K sisters has her charms (personally I think they're all pretty...Khloe gets a bum wrap), but Kim is gorgeous no matter how you slice it...

bum wrap...see what i did there?  :P

Ms Kim would require the More Expansive bum wrap, of course.

-D'Artagnian
not Expensive, but Expansive.  Keep it straight.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on June 25, 2015, 07:20:16 PM
:)

And I thought I had a big ass...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Reaver on June 25, 2015, 07:32:18 PM
And I thought I had a big ass...

Thinking about that body part getting bigger too  ;D ?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on June 25, 2015, 11:27:20 PM
And I thought I had a big ass...

Well, could we have a picture, please ? After all, if we are to agree or disagree with your statement, we need visual confirmation. All in the name of science, of course.  ;) ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on July 03, 2015, 02:53:43 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza Dewliddil on July 03, 2015, 11:55:58 AM
Thinking about that body part getting bigger too  ;D ?

LOL...

Uh, no.  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on July 03, 2015, 02:35:42 PM
Thinking about that body part getting bigger too  ;D ?

Yes please!

Kim and Chloe have long been competing for the biggest booty, now Kim's gonna take it to the next level!  :-*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 07, 2015, 05:52:54 AM
From late June:
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on July 07, 2015, 09:19:28 AM
Yes please!

Kim and Chloe have long been competing for the biggest booty, now Kim's gonna take it to the next level!  :-*

LOL

I think he was asking if I was thinking of making MY ass bigger, (as well as my boobs), not Kim's.

I'm sure a lot of you guys think about Kim's butt getting bigger!  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza D on July 07, 2015, 09:23:17 AM
Well, could we have a picture, please ? After all, if we are to agree or disagree with your statement, we need visual confirmation. All in the name of science, of course.  ;) ;D

I'm sure you can find a pic of my butt somewhere on the forum. Think of it as a scavenger hunt.
My butt may well be bigger, but Kim's tiny waist makes hers look HUGE!
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 13, 2015, 08:25:59 PM
I'm sure you can find a pic of my butt somewhere on the forum. Think of it as a scavenger hunt.
Quote

Challenge accepted.

Quote
My butt may well be bigger, but Kim's tiny waist makes hers look HUGE!
 ;D

Her relatively-tiny waist and her height (or lack of same) that emphasizes the size of her butt.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ippodamos on July 17, 2015, 04:18:04 AM
Hello, folks.

One of the most Wankable and Socialite **27**
Kim Kardashian is Pregnant Again!

She is one of the most curvaceous but...

...How About Her Body Now?

Getting bigger once again? Breast, Tummy and Buttocks in your opinion?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on July 17, 2015, 04:23:57 AM
^You are right on the money!
This picture is from yesterday and she is indeed getting bigger.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 28, 2015, 05:24:59 AM
She's getting so hippy, it's ridiculous. I love it when she gets pregnant!

Meanwhile, her sister Khloe is doing a great job herself.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on July 28, 2015, 03:49:13 PM
She's getting so hippy, it's ridiculous. I love it when she gets pregnant!

Speaking of hippy... ;)

(http://s2.postimg.org/65jz37eit/Kim1.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/65jz37eit/)

And just think...still 3 and a half months to go...that ass is going to go nuclear!  :-*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 29, 2015, 06:53:46 PM
Speaking of hippy... ;)

(http://s2.postimg.org/65jz37eit/Kim1.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/65jz37eit/)

And just think...still 3 and a half months to go...that ass is going to go nuclear!  :-*

I can't wait! Kanye is a lucky bastard :)

Another picture from the Complex photoshoot of Khloe, of which she said (on Instagram):


"This one is for all the troll haters out there that cannot seem to give me an ounce of credit for my daily workouts! The image on the left is an unretouched photo from the actual camera on the day of the shoot. The image on the right is the retouched photo. Yes skin is smooth and shadows are removed but I still think I look good on the left image. Flaws and all ... hi hater!!! Click on it... I know you want to :)"
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Phoofy on August 24, 2015, 05:17:23 PM
Victoria Zdrock Ph.D.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Reaver on August 24, 2015, 06:06:21 PM
Victoria Zdrock Ph.D.

Why did you post this picture in the Kardashian thread?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Mr_Pickles on September 02, 2015, 08:25:12 AM
Just found the woman who is proclaimed as the Cuban answer to Kim Kardashian. That is some prime real estate :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: jmskrb416 on September 02, 2015, 07:11:13 PM
Does the real estate have a name?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Brahma on September 02, 2015, 10:32:41 PM
Speaking of hippy... ;)

(http://s2.postimg.org/65jz37eit/Kim1.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/65jz37eit/)

And just think...still 3 and a half months to go...that ass is going to go nuclear!  :-*

Yes, I saw a picture of the ass the other day, and it is indeed huge.  Unfortunately, I was not able to save a copy.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on September 02, 2015, 10:56:44 PM
Yes, I saw a picture of the ass the other day, and it is indeed huge.  Unfortunately, I was not able to save a copy.


I know what you mean.  I am using a three terabytre system and I ran out of memory when I tried to copy dat ass.  I just didn't have enough room.  The system said to get a bigger monitor.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 03, 2015, 11:54:55 AM
Just found the woman who is proclaimed as the Cuban answer to Kim Kardashian. That is some prime real estate :o

Does the real estate have a name?

That's Kathy Ferreiro. A search on the Forum will yield more great images of her.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pio_z on September 04, 2015, 06:34:35 AM
It's interesting what is her measurements now and after pregnancy. Could she reach 50" or 55"?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on September 04, 2015, 01:52:55 PM
It's interesting what is her measurements now and after pregnancy. Could she reach 50" or 55"?

Well, compare her to a few "mere mortals" as seen in this pic...

(http://s10.postimg.org/6gqcp93lx/MCFan_for_Celeblounge_Celebs_Forum02_09_2015_12_4.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/6gqcp93lx/)

She's going to be so much bigger than her last pregnancy this time around...I'm beginning to think 50" is a possibility :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pio_z on September 05, 2015, 02:38:52 PM
If it's true I think she should have two or three more children. :) she can be the biggest if she wants it.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: CarlTL on September 26, 2015, 08:42:34 AM
 :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on October 03, 2015, 01:29:11 AM
Who's the Queen of Booty?


(http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=9982211.0;attach=443319;image)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on October 05, 2015, 04:56:28 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on October 06, 2015, 06:35:28 AM
Who's the Queen of Booty?


(http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=9982211.0;attach=443319;image)

Buttality!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Magiciano on October 06, 2015, 08:16:34 PM
A Longer version

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Affenmensch on October 07, 2015, 05:05:00 PM
Buttality!

Ass-valanche!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on October 17, 2015, 06:18:46 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on November 18, 2015, 12:23:33 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on December 04, 2015, 10:14:42 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheBoobGuy on December 05, 2015, 04:21:09 PM
A couple of weeks ago.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solo89 on December 06, 2015, 08:54:11 AM
She just had the kid so hopefully they're going to grow bigger while she's breast feeding like last time!!!!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on March 06, 2016, 03:43:12 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on March 06, 2016, 08:05:07 AM
A Longer version

J-Lo was the "big booty queen" long before Kim K showed up on the scene. And Miley Cyrus has the ass of a chicken cutlet.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on March 07, 2016, 01:29:23 PM
 :)

Taping up the girls...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Throbwalloper on March 08, 2016, 07:16:29 AM
Instagram pic yesterday...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: jmskrb416 on March 08, 2016, 11:59:56 AM
A Longer version

J-Lo was the "big booty queen" long before Kim K showed up on the scene. And Miley Cyrus has the ass of a chicken cutlet.

I think that was Iggy not Miley
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on March 21, 2016, 06:07:42 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on March 27, 2016, 10:39:33 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on April 25, 2016, 03:46:29 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on April 27, 2016, 06:08:55 PM
Apparently girls in the UK are changing how they speak to sound more like people such as Kim Kardashian. It is a phenomenon known as 'vocal fry' whereby instead of saying the word 'whatever'you say ;'whateverrrrrrr'. It is said that girls in groups talking like this sound like ducks quacking.

An insult to ducks if you ask me.

I think it is time Kim got rid of some of that useless flab...  divorcing Kanye would be a start...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Breast Loaf on April 28, 2016, 12:02:47 AM
recent
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pilotblaze on April 28, 2016, 06:09:41 AM
A Longer version

J-Lo was the "big booty queen" long before Kim K showed up on the scene. And Miley Cyrus has the ass of a chicken cutlet.

I didn't know that a chicken cutlet even Had an ass.
Can somebody tell or show me what section of the chicken cutlet is the ass part?

-D'Artagnian
Boy, I'd hate to be known as "Cutlet Butt".    :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Morehouse on April 28, 2016, 08:35:19 AM
A Longer version

J-Lo was the "big booty queen" long before Kim K showed up on the scene. And Miley Cyrus has the ass of a chicken cutlet.

I didn't know that a chicken cutlet even Had an ass.
Can somebody tell or show me what section of the chicken cutlet is the ass part?

-D'Artagnian
Boy, I'd hate to be known as "Cutlet Butt".    :D

That was exactly the point. Chicken cutlet has no ass and neither does she.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza on April 28, 2016, 05:52:41 PM
recent

That looks way too big to be Kim.

Just sayin'
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on May 04, 2016, 02:49:58 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on May 06, 2016, 04:09:21 PM
KK in the Daily Mail a lot recently, her and her totally self-absorbed 'centre of the Universe' husband, have been in Cuba this week.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on June 10, 2016, 05:26:58 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Ninjaturtle on June 11, 2016, 09:04:15 PM
I've always liked Lela Star when she portrays KK
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on July 03, 2016, 09:07:18 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on August 05, 2016, 05:09:32 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on August 20, 2016, 04:25:08 PM
 :o
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on August 21, 2016, 10:28:37 AM
So want her to get pregnant again.... *sighs*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on September 10, 2016, 10:16:41 PM
So want her to get pregnant again.... *sighs*

I know the feeling. Anything to shut her up and stop having to hear that highly annoying affected "vocal fry". It's as annoying when a man does it as when a woman does it, and yet most people perceive it as more annoying when a woman does it for some reason.

Speaking of professional skankasauri, here she is with Taylor Swift.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on September 12, 2016, 03:32:31 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on October 05, 2016, 01:28:49 PM
I am very surprised that no-one as yet has commented on Kim K and the robbery which took place recently in Paris, a robbery which many people believe was either an inside job or faked for publicity purposes.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Hark on October 09, 2016, 08:05:23 AM
With all due respect, I hope this incident, if true, would teach her & her family a little humility.  I despise the Kardashians, they're the epitome of decadence & narcissism.  Yes, every young female wants to be a fairy princess, and Kim is as close to one as a non-noble family could provide.  This isn't the era of the Kennedys, anymore.  Families like this, the Trumps, Clintons, etc. are so flawed, that although I acknowledge they're human, their power eclipses their humanity, and makes them detached from the rest of us.

Still, I'd love to see pics of Kim tied up.  My two cents.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Eliza on October 10, 2016, 11:02:40 AM
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing: She's a mother now, she needs to be more careful with her lifestyle for the sake of her kids.

But, I think people in the lime light have always been flawed, I just think that the media used to look the other way a lot in the "old days".  I know that was true for Kennedy!
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on October 22, 2016, 05:04:23 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on November 22, 2016, 05:04:49 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Shadowmuse Blown on November 22, 2016, 08:05:13 PM
Does this dress make my butt look big?  ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Maik on November 23, 2016, 02:09:50 AM
Does this dress make my butt look big?  ;)

No. But it makes the rest of your body looks small. ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on January 09, 2017, 02:03:45 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on February 23, 2017, 03:38:00 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 28, 2017, 01:38:56 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on April 29, 2017, 03:46:00 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on May 17, 2017, 09:40:42 PM
In this photo from 22 April 2017, her tits are smaller, she's wearing a corset (or a waist trainer) -- but at least the ass is still fat.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: tdotter on May 20, 2017, 02:03:43 AM
I remembered when these pictures of her in Mexico came out and a number of people criticized her for having cellulite and she answered those criticisms in a post on her Instagram.
I would go out of my mind if that ass was in front of me.I would be in that ass 24/7.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on July 31, 2017, 12:46:32 AM

I remembered when these pictures of her in Mexico came out and a number of people criticized her for having cellulite and she answered those criticisms in a post on her Instagram.
I would go out of my mind if that ass was in front of me.I would be in that ass 24/7.

Tell me about it! I know I don't care a jot about any woman's cellulite...especially if they possess a derriere as nice as this.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on July 31, 2017, 05:44:32 PM
I remembered when these pictures of her in Mexico came out and a number of people criticized her for having cellulite and she answered those criticisms in a post on her Instagram.
I would go out of my mind if that ass was in front of me.I would be in that ass 24/7.

She is a goddess.

What I love is that it just keeps on getting bigger as she gets older...can't wait to see it when she hits 40 *melts*
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on July 31, 2017, 05:52:53 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on August 19, 2017, 07:43:57 AM
Did a gif...my fantasy of Kim at 40 :)

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 20, 2017, 10:06:55 PM
That animation in that GIF moved so slowly that at first I thought it was broken :)

I don't know if the original photo was ever posted here.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on August 21, 2017, 01:56:05 PM
That animation in that GIF moved so slowly that at first I thought it was broken :)

I don't know if the original photo was ever posted here.

A little patience brings its rewards ;)

Might make it longer at some point ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on October 30, 2017, 06:46:21 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on October 31, 2017, 10:36:45 AM
Looking fantastic, but by all rights she should’ve been about 6 months pregnant by now — and we saw how big she got last time :(
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on December 23, 2017, 06:41:28 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on April 27, 2018, 04:57:08 AM
 ::)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: pilotblaze on April 27, 2018, 09:08:28 PM
Re the image above:

There! See?!
I knew it.  She's an android made with that injection molded grey rubber sub-layer.
Especially the expandable butt.
Probably manufactured in the Westworld facility.

-D'Artagnian

Explains why she never smiles, too.  Cheap prototype sensayuma software.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: bignatslover on April 29, 2018, 08:29:40 AM
Re the image above:

There! See?!
I knew it.  She's an android made with that injection molded grey rubber sub-layer.
Especially the expandable butt.
Probably manufactured in the Westworld facility.

-D'Artagnian

Explains why she never smiles, too.  Cheap prototype sensayuma software.
LOL!  Love the nerd stuff in your post.
If she's a bot, she's one of the best ones ever made.  "Fully functional", as an early video showed.   ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on July 16, 2018, 02:22:15 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on August 01, 2018, 05:44:31 PM
Her ass-ets on classy display.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on November 09, 2018, 06:31:28 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: suzieq_ on November 12, 2018, 12:06:56 PM
This is my all-time fav version of Kim -- silver-blonde, late 30s, perfect curves and luscious boobs :)

Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Pendejo on August 04, 2019, 06:13:49 PM
Only if...
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: MaxBigfoot on August 04, 2019, 06:39:51 PM
Only if...

That is one high quality sexy morph!   :o ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on April 17, 2020, 06:15:49 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: phonehome1 on April 17, 2020, 08:37:03 AM
If you consider Doc Brown' in Back to the Future 'theory of how a single change of events can radically alter the history of the world then just consider the world as we now know it if one of the two following events had not taken place /

OJ had not killed Nicole Brown

He did kill her but Robert Kardashian had not in any way been involved in the trial

The  "Kardashian empire" as we know it would have never happened

Assuming Kim K's sex tape would have still been made and that it "got out"

I would have been just low quality video of some black rapper F--king some groupie with a funding sounding last name that anyone out side the greater LA area and plenty from within it would have never heard of and like the dozens if not hundreds of other such tapes it would have been IGNORED

No KUWTK

No "Dash stores"

Kris who ?

Chole who ?

Kylie who ?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on April 18, 2020, 07:25:57 AM
And then Kanye might still have been dating if not married to Shay the UK Bombshell. We might have heard more songs from "American Boy" singer Estelle
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on April 18, 2020, 05:35:40 PM
And perhaps Kanye's mum wouldn't have gone in for the surgery that she eventually died of complications from, and then he wouldn't have started going buggy, and then he wouldn't have married Kim.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on December 01, 2020, 08:19:51 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: cebe on December 03, 2020, 06:26:04 AM
Because I like them bigger  ::) ;)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on December 03, 2020, 06:27:46 AM
Because I like them bigger  ::) ;)

I like how you think.  ;D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on October 01, 2021, 10:42:19 AM
Busty Magazine covers Part 99: Kim Kardashian
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on October 17, 2021, 02:51:29 PM
Did any of you catch her hosting Saturday Night Live last week?
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Kopy Kat on October 18, 2021, 07:10:45 AM
I tried to but our choreography was off.
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on January 02, 2022, 10:50:14 PM
Strangely, he's right.

Joe Rogan on Kim Kardashian
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwdnrLmHHQw)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: salem on February 07, 2022, 07:36:56 PM
Busty Magazine covers Part 155: Kim Kardashian
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: TheZookie007 on December 13, 2022, 02:13:33 PM
 :D
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on October 27, 2023, 05:52:48 AM
Bumping this neglected thread.  :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on October 03, 2024, 05:52:50 AM
Per salem, she is #31 out of 150 views even though this thread has been mostly forgotten for the last few years.  :P
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on October 05, 2025, 06:00:10 AM
Per salem, she is #32 of the top 150 views.  :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Captain Nemo on October 05, 2025, 09:19:13 AM
Linked from my post of 14 November 2014. If you're interested in more morphs of this photoset go to page 12 of this thread (https://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=526219.0;attach=395499;image)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on October 06, 2025, 12:41:12 AM
Linked from my post of 14 November 2014. If you're interested in more morphs of this photoset go to page 12 of this thread (https://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=526219.0;attach=395499;image)

Page 12 images unfortunately were mostly wiped out due to the forum having a meltdown at that time :( and the 14 November 2014 stuff is in page 64.  :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Captain Nemo on October 07, 2025, 05:41:09 AM
That was dumb of me: l didn't consider  that everyone can set the number of pages displayed, so there can be different reference pages: for me 12 was correct. But 14 November 2024 was the correct date of posting.
Here's another from my Kardashian set:

(https://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=526219.0;attach=396211;image)
Linked from my post of 14 November 2014. If you're interested in more morphs of this photoset go to page 12 of this thread (https://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=526219.0;attach=395499;image)

Page 12 images unfortunately were mostly wiped out due to the forum having a meltdown at that time :( and the 14 November 2014 stuff is in page 64.  :)
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: solvegas on October 07, 2025, 07:48:29 AM
^ I hope you didn't feel I was being a jerk toward you.  :(
Title: Re: Kim Kardashian MERGED
Post by: Dan on October 09, 2025, 09:19:59 PM
.