Breast Expansion Archive Forum
Discussions => General Discussion => General Discussion: Obsolete Threads => Topic started by: twysted on June 20, 2008, 12:09:36 PM
-
I think that about says it all.
I can't believe my eyes.
(Image from a prohibited source removed.)
Images from web$hots, my$pace and similar sites are prohibited in this forum. Please review the Forum Rules before posting anything else.
-
interesting...
-
Quote:
twysted said:
I think that about says it all.
I can't believe my eyes.
Good lord. Who is she?
-
posted less than a day ago on a site that specializes in material from sites that are prohibited here
edit: sorry guys, I don't mean to be the annoying cop, I just don't want you to get your hopes up for more pictures.
-
Quote:
Glottis said:
posted less than a day ago on a site that specializes in material from sites that are prohibited here
that makes me sad. and I was going to ask if there were mroe pictures.
-
Well, she certainly is...blessed. Worthy of a "wow," but I reserve my "Holy mother of God" for Rachel A., Jana, and Denise.
-
bwaaaahhh!
I shall keep this thread alive with my trademarked brand of blasphemy.
So, here is an on-topic picture of the holy mother of god.
-
Quote:
Glottis said:
posted less than a day ago on a site that specializes in material from sites that are prohibited here
edit: sorry guys, I don't mean to be the annoying cop, I just don't want you to get your hopes up for more pictures.
There *are* more pictures. And there is no reference on that site or on any other as to the source of the pic I posted. There is absolutely no proof that that pic came from a "restricted" site, nobody knows where it came from, but if the mods want to remove a great find because it happened to appear on a certain other site (that has also featured Maggie, Jana, Rachel Aldana etc in the past) then I have no choice but to yield to their authority. I think it's a bit overzealous though but w/e, sorry, didn't mean to tread on anyone's toes
-
Sacrelicious
-
Quote:
twysted said:
Quote:
Glottis said:
posted less than a day ago on a site that specializes in material from sites that are prohibited here
edit: sorry guys, I don't mean to be the annoying cop, I just don't want you to get your hopes up for more pictures.
There *are* more pictures. And there is no reference on that site or on any other as to the source of the pic I posted. There is absolutely no proof that that pic came from a "restricted" site, nobody knows where it came from, but if the mods want to remove a great find because it happened to appear on a certain other site (that has also featured Maggie, Jana, Rachel Aldana etc in the past) then I have no choice but to yield to their authority. I think it's a bit overzealous though but w/e, sorry, didn't mean to tread on anyone's toes
I really don't want to start an argument here, but do you have any clue as to why certain sites are prohibited here? Images of minors, when looked at for the reasons that we look at anything in this forum, can be construed as pornography, and is therefore illegal. At least, this is the understanding of the owner of this site whose rules you must obey. The pictures of the other models that you have mentioned showing up on that site is mere coincidence, as it's not even what that site is designed (even named) for. Nobody could claim that this girl is definitely over 18, and that is the heart of this issue.
-
Quote:
twysted said:
There *are* more pictures. And there is no reference on that site or on any other as to the source of the pic I posted. There is absolutely no proof that that pic came from a "restricted" site, nobody knows where it came from, but if the mods want to remove a great find because it happened to appear on a certain other site (that has also featured Maggie, Jana, Rachel Aldana etc in the past) then I have no choice but to yield to their authority. I think it's a bit overzealous though but w/e, sorry, didn't mean to tread on anyone's toes
As Glottis partly explained above, the Forum Rules don't exist to spoil your fun; they're here to protect this forum from civil and criminal prosecution. In the U.S., the display of photos of people under the age of 18 on porn sites like this one can lead to unpleasant consequences. Since images from my$pace, web$hots, and similar sites were originally posted without age verification, we can't safely assume that their subjects are over 18. For that reason, the owner of this site --whose rules you contractually agreed to follow when you registered here-- prohibits all images from those sources. There was no need to apologize. You're welcome here, and if you'll follow the forum rules in the future, everything will be fine.
-
Quote:
GALVATRON said:
bwaaaahhh!
I shall keep this thread alive with my trademarked brand of blasphemy.
So, here is an on-topic picture of the holy mother of god.
As a catholic I really hate to even say it, but I'd hit that and go to hell...
-
Well at least god had a good idea of the perfect woman.
-
Quote:
ltfields said:
Quote:
GALVATRON said:
bwaaaahhh!
I shall keep this thread alive with my trademarked brand of blasphemy.
So, here is an on-topic picture of the holy mother of god.
As a catholic I really hate to even say it, but I'd hit that and go to hell...
No you wouldn't: you'd hit it, say (with new meaning) a "Hail Mary" or two, and then be absolved
-
Save me a spot in Hell guys! I'll be with you in a moment...