[Scarface]

Trying this again.
Chiara Mazzola,
Would you say she's a JJ cup or same size as Wendy Fiore?

[Margaret]

Trying this again.
Chiara Mazzola,
Would you say she's a JJ cup or same size as Wendy Fiore?

I’ve had a look around - it’s difficult to tell because there’s a lot of back arching and emphasis going on, but I’d definitely put her up in the HH-J category, but she could easily be a GG/H. Possibly a 28-30 back.

Can you remind me what I said Wendy was?

She is really beautiful btw. I should have said that up front! (Pardon the pun!).

[Scarface]

^
For Wendy I believe you said she could be a 30JJ or a 32HH might work as well.

Yes, Chiara is quite stunning. I knew she was well endowed but I was so focused on her face I didn't realize how well endowed and some recent pics really made me do a double take.

Her thread probably has better samples for guessing. I'll link it below.

https://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?topic=10004636.0

[Margaret]

^
For Wendy I believe you said she could be a 30JJ or a 32HH might work as well.

Yes, Chiara is quite stunning. I knew she was well endowed but I was so focused on her face I didn't realize how well endowed and some recent pics really made me do a double take.

Her thread probably has better samples for guessing. I'll link it below.

https://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?topic=10004636.0

Yeah - she appears big, but I think if I measured and assessed her she would be more like a 30GG (my size). She just does a lot of work to emphasise her shape - and she has a tiny waist, so a 28HH/J wouldn’t be unusual.

[Scarface]

That 28 measurement is below the bust?
I guess it's the cup size that counts. I just always remember growing up thinking 36DD was huge. I think that's what they said Samantha Fox was and she was my favourite.

[Margaret]

That 28 measurement is below the bust?
I guess it's the cup size that counts. I just always remember growing up thinking 36DD was huge. I think that's what they said Samantha Fox was and she was my favourite.

Yeah, she’s very slight and slim. I’d expect her to have a 28 or 30” back and an overbust measurement of about 38”. So about a 10” difference - but there’s more to it than that. Some people can’t wear a 28 (because they’re actually a 27” or a 29” back, but you have to round up or down) and then the nra adds fabric, so a 28GG might not work, whereas a 30H might etc.

Also, Samantha Fox was never a 36DD. I think I assessed her long ago - she’d be something like a 28E or a 30F.

[Scarface]

Could Samantha have been a 36 overbust and they used that # to make it sound like she's bigger?

[Margaret]

Could Samantha have been a 36 overbust and they used that # to make it sound like she's bigger?

No. It was in the days of the +4 measuring method - where you measured your underbust, rounded up and added four inches. So a 31” back became a 32” and you added 4” to make it a 36. It’s how bra sizes were determined from the 70s/80s into the mid-2000s, and how we ended up wearing 34 and 36DD bras (or XL if you were super-big) - which were all wrong.

So let’s assume Sam was a 31” back, you’d round that to 32” and add four inches to get a 36 back - and then DD cup was basically what she would have had to fit herself into.

To my mind, she’s probably a 30 back and possibly about 34-36” around the bust, which would give her something like a 30F in real money, but I’m not even convinced she was a 30F. I was a 30/32FF until recently (I’m now a 30GG) and I’m way bigger than she ever was.

She was probably something like a 28F, maybe a 30E.

[solvegas]

Could Samantha have been a 36 overbust and they used that # to make it sound like she's bigger?

No. It was in the days of the +4 measuring method - where you measured your underbust, rounded up and added four inches. So a 31” back became a 32” and you added 4” to make it a 36. It’s how bra sizes were determined from the 70s/80s into the mid-2000s, and how we ended up wearing 34 and 36DD bras (or XL if you were super-big) - which were all wrong.

So let’s assume Sam was a 31” back, you’d round that to 32” and adde four inches to get a 36 back - and then DD cup was basically what she would have had to fit herself into.

To my mind, she’s probably a 30 back and possibly about 34-36” around the bust, which would give her something like a 30F in real money, but I’m not even convinced she was a 30F. I was a 30/32FF until recently (I’m now a 30GG) and I’m way bigger than she ever was.

She was probably something like a 28F, maybe a 30E.

Always good to have someone that knows what they are talking about. 

[Shadowmuse Blown]

To my mind, she’s probably a 30 back and possibly about 34-36” around the bust, which would give her something like a 30F in real money, but I’m not even convinced she was a 30F. I was a 30/32FF until recently (I’m now a 30GG) and I’m way bigger than she ever was.

She was probably something like a 28F, maybe a 30E.

Margaret, just so you know, these statements drive us crazy.  LOL

[Margaret]

To my mind, she’s probably a 30 back and possibly about 34-36” around the bust, which would give her something like a 30F in real money, but I’m not even convinced she was a 30F. I was a 30/32FF until recently (I’m now a 30GG) and I’m way bigger than she ever was.

She was probably something like a 28F, maybe a 30E.

Margaret, just so you know, these statements drive us crazy.  LOL

I remember Samantha Fox well, and I remember thinking at the time I had bigger boobs than her. She just happened to show hers to the nation in a newspaper every other day.

[solvegas]

I remember Samantha Fox well, and I remember thinking at the time I had bigger boobs than her. She just happened to show hers to the nation in a newspaper every other day.

I also remember from back in the 1980's how cute and gorgeous she was and busty by the standards of the entertainment industry at that time. I was very disappointed when later on she said she was a Lesbian. 

[Margaret]

Could Samantha have been a 36 overbust and they used that # to make it sound like she's bigger?

No. It was in the days of the +4 measuring method - where you measured your underbust, rounded up and added four inches. So a 31” back became a 32” and you added 4” to make it a 36. It’s how bra sizes were determined from the 70s/80s into the mid-2000s, and how we ended up wearing 34 and 36DD bras (or XL if you were super-big) - which were all wrong.

So let’s assume Sam was a 31” back, you’d round that to 32” and adde four inches to get a 36 back - and then DD cup was basically what she would have had to fit herself into.

To my mind, she’s probably a 30 back and possibly about 34-36” around the bust, which would give her something like a 30F in real money, but I’m not even convinced she was a 30F. I was a 30/32FF until recently (I’m now a 30GG) and I’m way bigger than she ever was.

She was probably something like a 28F, maybe a 30E.

Always good to have someone that knows what they are talking about. 

It’s among my favourite subjects. In addition to now generating AI images, I love nothing more than bra fitting, breast health - and bras in general. I’m absolutely nuts about bras. (As many of you are - but for very different reasons!).

[Maik]

I am not sure if we had Leanne Lovelace here in the past.

According to some sources she is billed to have 60-24-33 with a height of 5ft 2in.
Some sources say she has a 102JJJ bra size.
I doubt that she is that hugh around the bust cause she is not that height.
Even 102in for the underbust seems to be not exact, even if this is a metric value, 102cm for underbust might be too hugh for her small body.

I hope Margaret can help to get more precise values.
The picture don't have that high resolution, but I hope the hands under her bust are some help for size estimation.

[Margaret]

I am not sure if we had Leanne Lovelace here in the past.

According to some sources she is billed to have 60-24-33 with a height of 5ft 2in.
Some sources say she has a 102JJJ bra size.
I doubt that she is that hugh around the bust cause she is not that height.
Even 102in for the underbust seems to be not exact, even if this is a metric value, 102cm for underbust might be too hugh for her small body.

I hope Margaret can help to get more precise values.
The picture don't have that high resolution, but I hope the hands under her bust are some help for size estimation.

If the 102 means anything, it's bound to be cm, which is about 40". If that's her overbust (and I always assume these figures are exaggerated), then given the size of her boobs (and her height), I'd be thinking her back size would be about 30", which would give her something along the lines of a 30HH/J. Given the roundness and projection she has, she looks more like a 28/30 back - and, I some pics (and some pretty hardcore videos) I've seen since googling her, she has very  big, full-on-bottom boobs, so I'm more inclined to think she's probably (or was) something like a 30JJ. However, even looking at a 30JJ example, she seems much more like a 32JJ/K.