[solvegas]

Would be great if Margaret could guess the size of Valentina di Rocco. They must be ginormous, like H to J Cups  .
Unfortunately I couldn't find any height of her for a better size-to-body relation.

I asked Margaret a few years ago on Lali. She responded here: https://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?topic=10004262.msg10577941;topicseen#msg10577941
I'll let her speak for herself of course

Yeah, as I said, probably something like 32H/HH, maybe 32J (at a push). She does a lot of work to make her boobs sit high on her torso and push out. She has a really amazing figure. I’m jealous!

Margaret, in my opinion, you are a beautiful woman, and it isn't just about physical looks, your character is great and so you are a great lady. 

Thank-you Solvegas, you’re very kind.

Like Police detective Joe Friday on the old TV show Dragnet used to say, just the facts ma'am, just the facts.

[Maik]

Hope when Margeret finds some time, she might like to give some info on this Model.
She goes by Amira Love and the web said she is 5'10" tall with some 44LL/M Cup.

I wonder abot the 44, cause if I understand the meassurement correctly, this number stands for the underbust value. with 5'10" tall and weighting 141lbs,
I think she is slim and might only be around 35" in underbust  ?

Also I have one second question, i hope Margaret can explain:
What is the reason of having two letters instead of the next one in alphabet?
As I understand the system of cup meassuring goes letter by letter, so after a D-Cup comes an E-Cup, but sometimes an E-Cup goes under DD-Cup and the tripple letter DDD is similar to an F-Cup?
I would understand if the double letters stands for inbetween sizes, or even if it is like in Excel where after the last X-collumn it goes on with double letters 

[Shadowmuse Blown]

Hope when Margeret finds some time, she might like to give some info on this Model.
She goes by Amira Love and the web said she is 5'10" tall with some 44LL/M Cup.

I wonder abot the 44, cause if I understand the meassurement correctly, this number stands for the underbust value. with 5'10" tall and weighting 141lbs,
I think she is slim and might only be around 35" in underbust  ?

Also I have one second question, i hope Margaret can explain:
What is the reason of having two letters instead of the next one in alphabet?
As I understand the system of cup meassuring goes letter by letter, so after a D-Cup comes an E-Cup, but sometimes an E-Cup goes under DD-Cup and the tripple letter DDD is similar to an F-Cup?
I would understand if the double letters stands for inbetween sizes, or even if it is like in Excel where after the last X-collumn it goes on with double letters 

It’s the U.K. cupsize system. Here’s a conversion chart between US/EU/UK cupsize from Bare Necessities.  A picture is worth a thousand words.

[Margaret]

Hope when Margeret finds some time, she might like to give some info on this Model.
She goes by Amira Love and the web said she is 5'10" tall with some 44LL/M Cup.

I wonder abot the 44, cause if I understand the meassurement correctly, this number stands for the underbust value. with 5'10" tall and weighting 141lbs,
I think she is slim and might only be around 35" in underbust  ?

Also I have one second question, i hope Margaret can explain:
What is the reason of having two letters instead of the next one in alphabet?
As I understand the system of cup meassuring goes letter by letter, so after a D-Cup comes an E-Cup, but sometimes an E-Cup goes under DD-Cup and the tripple letter DDD is similar to an F-Cup?
I would understand if the double letters stands for inbetween sizes, or even if it is like in Excel where after the last X-collumn it goes on with double letters 

I don’t mean to be rude, but the photos of this woman seem odd. Almost as though they’ve been photoshopped. Is she a real person?

In any case, I’m not convinced she’d be a 44 back, I suspect that was (or is) a marketing ploy. Even if she’s 5’10”, the bodyshape in the photos I’ve seen of her don’t match with my experience of a 44 back. Certainly not any I’ve ever seen. I suspect she’s somewhere around the 36-38 back size, and possibly in the KK cup range. But the size she is in the photos available online is so inconsistent - and her face looks badly photoshopped on to someone else’s body.

In terms of the double letters in bra sizing, no-one really knows why it came about. There’s a lengthy article on Wikipedia about how bra sizing came about (the letters were an attempt to standardise the manufacturing process, because in order to make a bra that fits exactly, you’d have to make a different one for every woman - so they grouped them into cups and lettered the cups according to the letters of the alphabet: 1 = A and so on). It was only later that they realised they needed very subtle variances in the cup sizes and had to add new ones; a D cup proved to have more variance, so they added another D (so as to not have to move every other subsequent letter up one cup size and confuse everyone in that range). And it just stuck.

UK cup sizes are different from US, and just about every other region or country in the world has their own system. It’s hard to say which one works best - I’ve always worked with UK sizes, so it’s difficult for me to adjust to another system. They’re by no means perfect - bra fitting is an art, not a science. For example, you have a variance known as “sister sizing” where a woman could fit into a 32FF, but also a 30G or a 34F. (Up a band, down a cup or down a band, up a cup). It’s because the corresponding change of band or cup size makes up for the lack or increase of band/cup material.

It’s always best to remember that the band and cup sizes are just a guide. A bra is best fitted when tried on.

[Scarface]

^
She's indeed photoshopped. See the Amira Love thread where it's been confirmed.

[solvegas]

It's great when Margaret returns to the forum. 

[Maik]

Thanks for your explanation Margaret.
Most here are now on the point to say that this person does not really exist.
I find it strange that she is listed in some articles on boobpedia or babepedia with a whole life span from birth to measurements and so on 

[Superion]

I think I may start a thread for Tima. Can you give an estimate Margaret?

[Margaret]

I think I may start a thread for Tima. Can you give an estimate Margaret?

Might need some more pics for a better estimate - but it’ll be small in the back and big in the cups. Possibly something like a 28/30 back and JJ/K in the boobs. But it’ll all depend.

[solvegas]

I think I may start a thread for Tima. Can you give an estimate Margaret?

Might need some more pics for a better estimate - but it’ll be small in the back and big in the cups. Possibly something like a 28/30 back and JJ/K in the boobs. But it’ll all depend.

Superion should start a thread of her and post a bunch of different angle photos so you can get a good look at her Margaret. 

[Margaret]

I think I may start a thread for Tima. Can you give an estimate Margaret?

Might need some more pics for a better estimate - but it’ll be small in the back and big in the cups. Possibly something like a 28/30 back and JJ/K in the boobs. But it’ll all depend.

Superion should start a thread of her and post a bunch of different angle photos so you can get a good look at her Margaret. 

That works certainly be of some help.

[solvegas]

I think I may start a thread for Tima. Can you give an estimate Margaret?

Might need some more pics for a better estimate - but it’ll be small in the back and big in the cups. Possibly something like a 28/30 back and JJ/K in the boobs. But it’ll all depend.

Superion should start a thread of her and post a bunch of different angle photos so you can get a good look at her Margaret. 

That works certainly be of some help.

It's good to always see your responses. 

[Margaret]

I think I may start a thread for Tima. Can you give an estimate Margaret?

Might need some more pics for a better estimate - but it’ll be small in the back and big in the cups. Possibly something like a 28/30 back and JJ/K in the boobs. But it’ll all depend.

Superion should start a thread of her and post a bunch of different angle photos so you can get a good look at her Margaret. 

That works certainly be of some help.

It's good to always see your responses. 

I meant “would” ! Damn autocorrect.

[Shadowmuse Blown]

Margaret, has anyone asked you about Honey?

Here’s a current pic…



And here’s a link to her thread

[Margaret]

Margaret, has anyone asked you about Honey?

Here’s a current pic…



And here’s a link to her thread

I’ve seen this lady on social media a few times. There’s a lot of wide-angle and high-angle shooting going on, which helps over-emphasise size, and of course she wears too-small bras or often puts her bra shoulder straps too tight in order to pull her boobs up. She’s quite short (probably around 5’1” or 5’2”, so that also helps over-emphasise her size as well. With all that said, she has a reasonably slim torso, but a broad back - and she still has large boobs for her overall size. I’d put her in the 32 back category and possibly around JJ cup size (as ever, I go with UK bra sizing). She would be around there if I was taking a guess.