The Petra Verkaik appreciation thread MERGED

EgregiousSamuel · « **Reply #75 on:** October 08, 2003, 01:26:11 AM »

Petra may not be the biggest ever, but she is the floppiest ever, and therefore the best ever.

geoffk · « **Reply #76 on:** October 08, 2003, 01:51:37 AM »

The girl in the shower pic is Devon Daniels, one of my favorites from the 80's.

There are a bunch of pictures of her here:
http://www.retroclassics.btinternet.co.uk/DevonDaniels/Devon.htm

SwitcherX · « **Reply #77 on:** October 08, 2003, 02:01:06 AM »

> that she's lost a good bit of weight since having her kids. Now she looks

She had kids?

Sadistyk · « **Reply #78 on:** October 08, 2003, 02:33:02 AM »

She still looks marvelous!

Panzuriel · « **Reply #79 on:** October 08, 2003, 04:55:19 AM »

I concur, Petra is in my top ten playmates of all time. She is fantastic. At least I think that she's in the top ten. Oh, must do more research.

__________ · « **Reply #80 on:** October 08, 2003, 07:44:47 AM »

Even as a horny teenager I could not get into Playboy. I always found it much too soft for my taste. Then some time in late 1990 I discovered Petra Verkaik. That chick hit me like a ton of bricks, and she's just as hot now as she ever was. I'm still not a fan of Playboy magazine, but I will always be a fan of Petra!

Scotchman · « **Reply #81 on:** October 08, 2003, 08:11:45 AM »

Yeah, she's seems a little heavier in the video. I like her better that way
too. Her face is less angular and her boobs seem much bigger. Just more
feminine. I 'll do some caps from the tape tonight if I can scrounge a VCR.

I'm not a Petra expert so maybe I'm wrong about her having [censored] . I thought
she got married and had a couple of [censored] in the early 90's. Right before
she started her web site.

paula382236 · « **Reply #82 on:** October 08, 2003, 09:12:47 AM »

According to the FAQ in her website she's never married and never had kids. I had the pleasure of meeting her in Chicago a few years back and she was the sweetest thing in heels. Generous with her time and happy for all the attention. Her website is rather nice as well.
http://www.petracentral.com/faq/index.htm

paula382236 · « **Reply #83 on:** October 08, 2003, 11:23:23 AM »

Luscious

SteveZ · « **Reply #84 on:** October 08, 2003, 11:34:05 AM »

Quote:

Yeah, she's seems a little heavier in the video. I like her better that way too. Her face is less angular and her boobs seem much bigger. Just more feminine. I 'll do some caps from the tape tonight if I can scrounge a VCR.

Wow. I would just love to see some caps (clips?

) from this.

Which video are you talking about?

Steve Z

Scotchman · « **Reply #85 on:** October 08, 2003, 11:50:20 AM »

"Centerfold Fantasies" circa 1997. I got the tape and I'll cap some scenes tonight.

DTM · « **Reply #86 on:** October 08, 2003, 02:21:19 PM »

I haven't seen her in about a year.But I can tell you she is all natural and has no kids. Her brother just got married this past weekend. So she's hoping for some nieces or nephews.

SwitcherX · « **Reply #87 on:** October 08, 2003, 02:28:03 PM »

some Dru Diamond pictures

Scotchman · « **Reply #89 on:** October 08, 2003, 10:15:52 PM »

The video opens with my least favorite scene. They chose a poor
location and Petra's skin tone blends with the background.
No contrast to see her great profile and curves.

But Petra drives me kuh-ra-zee when I see her from behind. I just love
that "boobs peeking around both sides" thing. Yeeahhh.

Re: The Petra Verkaik appreciation thread MERGED