[gOOber]

 BRITNEY'S BREASTS THROB
 
Britney Spears is to get a pair of pump-up breasts that will throb in time with her breathing.

A group of lucky experts are fixing the attachments to the singer to make her pole-dancing poses more raunchy.


But they won't be getting their hands on the real thing.

The pump-up breasts are being fixed to the star's waxwork model at Madame Tussauds in London.

Bosses want to make the £52,000 model more realistic.

So they are hoisting it up and around a dancing pole.

Her breasts will then hang provocatively out of a skimpy top, inflating rhythmically to make it look like the singer is breathing heavily.

"For the first time we are installing balloons in her chest so her boobs heave in and out," a spokesman told The Sun.

Britney will be the centrepeice of the museum's new £2m interactive room.
 

   

[dev]

They couldn't do that for someone with more than hype in front could they.  

[Craig_Mercer]

This continues a bizarre new trend in the waxworks industry. I understand that new J-Lo and Brad Pitt works include silicone asses for a more interactive experience, turns out particular **29** statues are are being damaged by grope-happy attendants.  

[Character Zero]

Everytime I've opened up Hotmail today or gone on my MSN homepage today I saw links to stories about Britney Spears appearing topless in September's issue of Elle magazine.  SO I finally tracked down some pics online.  I'm not sure if this link has all the pictures from the magazine (I sure hope there are more than 2!) but at least I have an idea of what the articles are getting so worked up about. I'm sorry to say that Britney still isn't showing any nipple action or anything, but they are still the most revealing shots I've seen of her in a magazine. Thought you guys might like to check it out:

http://www.areafamosas.com/tablon/ver_mensaje.php?id_mensaje=1701

[gOOber]

   Just another step closer to her career in porn.  

 

     

[Kowalski]

She's looking skeezier all the time.

Hay character zero! Your avatar is a stock photo. (NICE, you payin' royalties??)

 

[D_U_S_K]

Topless?

Bah, That's nothing out of the normal. Her earlier rolling stone photos and previous outfits revealed more.

[McKormick]

Yes, but shes about to have a new CD, so shes gotta have SOMETHING in the news for people to say "Hey, thats Britney, remember her?" Least, I think thats her plan. Oh, and more about Justin leaving her.

[Goldeneye]

Is it just me, or is her butt not as big as it used to be?  

Somehow, her tits seemed like a much bigger deal (I mean that in every way) a few years ago.  They're actually quite tiny, even on her small frame.  They'd be better if they were the realistic kind...they're the small, hard, densely-packed kind.  Bleh.

[gOOber]

   

[Whink]

That's a fantastic fake!  Great job!

[READIROGUE]

I've never understood the facination with britney's breasts. They    are  SMALL . She's good looking but her breasts are not even noticable by any standard.
   

[McKormick]

They kinda looked large many years ago... for her body, that is. But I have a theory about this. Kind of like, all of a sudden she has breasts, and their completely inproportionate to the rest of her body, then as she grows they dont really grow but get more so proportional until they look right.

[JizzTits]

isn't this kinda off topic?  

[RandomX]

*points to the subject line* It had a link for something boob related, and the second post had something as well. Thus its on topic!

*sighs* This disgusts me. I wont get started on how civilization is getting crappier by the second, as I'm sure no one has a few hours to listen to me rant. But for the few teens who still worship the ground she walks on....WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH HER?? Sheesh get a job at Burger King or something, stop trying to cling to your last thead of fame...