[GoCubsGo]

Maxi vs. Chelsea in 2001

   

[Tiggo]

Great idea to have Chelsea pose in her older (2001) clothes!!

Someone suggest it to her!

I'm not a member of her site, but I have given generously to her the 3 times I've seen her in person.

She is really sweet and cute and of course, has the biggest tits that a mortal man can imagine......  

[Psf_79]

You know, once there was a time when we used to say, "her boobs are as big as her head!" when we referred to boobs we thought were big.

Now, when you describe the 'bigness' (biggity?) of Chelsea's boobs, you have to say they're twice as big as her head. Chelsea has re-defined the meaning of 'big'.

Look at that pic with Rhiannon in it. If Rhiannon has 4000+cc's in each implant, how much does Chelsea have nowadays? 10000cc's? I think I'm gonna faint...  

[Hentaibee]

hmm. As a fan of boob volume...I'd estimate Miss Charms has at least around 8000 - 8500 CC now...? anyone else?

[andrat2000]

If you believe on what she said some weeks ago on her message board, where she referred her boobs as '30 pound sacks'. Then again with here 2 year old FAQ where she says her breasts are 26 pounds apiece, I would say the 30 pounds apiece sounds feasible compared to here 2 year old informations. This would mean she has about 13000 - 13500 ccm apiece of breast now.

[Hentaibee]

(on the other hand, they absolutely look that big, but Chelsea isnt supertall, so its hard to compare ).

anyway. It just came to my mind that asking if she is the biggest is really pointless, because she IS the biggest for now and some time to come, and maybe ever.

yaaaaay for Chelsea Charms' Counting Classically Cleavageish Cyberhuge Chest
(say that 10 times in a row now)

[Whink]

I almost faint every time I look at her and start figuring that our also...

I believe it's because all the blood is rushing to my other head.  

 

[Hentaibee]

your other head... hahahaha. hilarious !
many men only think with their other head, then, right ?

[Whink]

Quote:
many men only think with their other head, then, right ?

Trudat.  And it's been the source of most of our problems for many many years!!

 

[Old_Chestnut]

from BarneyFife:

Quote:
 hahahahahahaha,I can't believe the side by sides Chelsea before and after pics.I mean this in a good way in the white dress I just can't see chelsea being that big.

     Well, Barney, I'll tell you how I arrived at that estimate.  I compared a linear measurement across one of CC's breasts to the size of her head (from hairline to chin, which I'm assuming hasn't changed in four years) in both that Nov. 2001 pic and one from Aug. 2004, choosing pictures where she was not too close to the camera to reduce the amount of lensing distortion (those images of her in the lace top do have serious distortion -- not that I mind   ).  I found that the ratio of corresponding breast to head lengths had increased by about 20-24% during that time (I checked some of the other 2004 pix to estimate the uncertainty...).  So I feel I can say with some confidence that her bosom is now somewhere close to the size I morphed it to in the 2001 photo (though it certainly doesn't sit that high on her torso...).from Hentaibee:

Quote:
hmm. As a fan of boob volume...I'd estimate Miss Charms has at least around 8000 - 8500 CC now...? anyone else?  

      OK, we know that breasts aren't spherical, so the volumes don't actually increase with the third power of their linear dimensions.  My own estimate for morphing purposes is more like (linear dimension)^2.5 .  That would suggest that, between 2001 and 2004, her breast volume had increased by 60-70% overall (and we know that there were variations during that interval).While I was making that last morph, I was guessing that CC had been around 5000 cc each at the time, so that would bring her to around 8000-8500 cc, just as HB says.   Then I tried another estimate from one of the other recent photos.  In this attached pic, we don't have her full figure, but I estimate that CC would stand about 9-1/2" high, to scale.  [Oh well, at least when I was working with this pic...]  I calculated the diameters of spheres with volumes of 8000, 12000, and 20000 cc and marked them in the photo to the same scale.  (There is perhaps a 10% uncertainty in the proper size of those circles.)  Again, breasts aren't true spheres, but there is at least a rough guide here.  Now I'm thinking andrat2000's figure of 13,000 cc isn't so wild:  if CC was closer to 7500 cc in that 2001 pic (using her old newsletter info), a 60-70% volume increase would now put her up in the 12,000-12,800 cc range!     So I'm thinking that Chelsea really is somewhere upward of 10,000 cc and may well be approaching 11-12,000!     We can also see if the weight figure makes sense.  In metric, 26 pounds is equivalent to a mass of 11.8 kilos.  Water has a density of 1 kg./1000 cc, fat is about 0.92 kg./1000 cc, and polypropylene string is somewhere around 0.35 kg./1000 cc. [CRC Handbook].  I estimate that CC's own original breast tissue was somewhere around 700-900 cc each (she's about 5'2" and says she started out as a DD-cup), the implants started out around 1200-1500 cc each (judging from the earliest pics from 2000), and the rest of the volume in each breast is serous fluid or otherwise has a density about that of water.  For a current volume of 8000 cc, that would give a mass estimate of  around 0.75 kg. (fat) + 0.5 kg. (PP) + 6 kg. (water), for a total of 7.25 kg. or 16 pounds each.  If her volume were more like 12,000 cc, the mass of water increases to about 10 kg., giving a total of 11.25 kg. or 25 pounds each.  [Feel free to adjust these estimates to your own liking...]I do wonder whether that weight figure of 26 pounds is really for each breast or her entire bosom, but we'd need better measurement information to resolve this...  [It's also worth noting, BTW, that the average density of her breasts is steadily approaching that of just water, mostly eliminating whatever weight advantage the polypropylene was originally intended to provide...]Say, would someone mind telling me how you get paragraph breaks to work on this board?

[tandoori]

any idea of the bust measurment of Miss Charm ?
70 inches ? 80 ?
can't imagine beyond that !!!
And is there any recent picture of measuring herself ?

[Whink]

Thanks, Chest-nut!  I didn't have that picture in my CC collection!!  

[BarneyFife]

Great job Old Chestnut, a genius is among us.Gee I wish Chelsea would model her old clothes now to see the difference.I know your calculations are the best you could do but nothing like the real thing modeling the clothes.From chelsea's new video where Crystal Gunns is wearing chelsea's old clothes it is very possible Chelsea's figure has grown to those proportions. Chelsea most recent picks,the christmas picks to me she doesn't look as large. I wish Ms Charms could resolve this and do another clothes video to settle it.The above pic you showed Chelsea is looking huge there compared to everyone else. I wonder if the other models egos shrink since they are much bigger than the average gal walking the streets but when chelsea comes by it is like they belong in training bras.  

[Feral]

Quote:
Old_Chestnut:
I do wonder whether that weight figure of 26 pounds is really for each breast or her entire bosom, but we'd need better measurement information to resolve this...  

I did wonder this as well, but she does specifically say so on her site that it is apiece. So, I'm guessing she'd be a natural 105-115 pounds without them. I can't imagine how she can comfortably deal with ~55% of her body weight on her chest. You'd think her shoulders would be wore out from her bra straps. Back during my school days, I remember how a Eastpak full of books would wear me out after a long day. I'm glad Chelsea bears her burden so well.

[Whink]

She now says they are 30 lbs each, so that's 60 pounds of tit.

But she has put on weight elsewhere as well...I'd say she's about 120 now, based on her height and add 60 lbs for a total of 180.

Boggles the mind.  Must be causing mobility issues by now.