Actually, one of the goals of my life has been to produce some way of accurately, definitively, scientifically measuring breast volume, so these questions could be answered.
There are so many sub-questions to the over-arching question of "Who has the biggest boobs of them all?"
#1 Who has the biggest breast circumference?
We always hear numbers like 34-D, or 38-DD or 121XXX, but many novice and ignorant boobmen equate those numbers with the breast circumference. They are not. They are indicative of the ribcage measurement. The actual breast circumference is indicated by the letter of the bra.
I'd like to see the old fashioned measuring contests they used to do at the Miss America pagents, NUDE of course, who knows who would actually be the biggest circumference because breast sag has a great deal to do with that.
And so therefore there would have to be two different categories, natrual and implants because IMHO it wouldn't be fair to compare the two. And obviously in the naturals category there would be many women who have HUGE boobs, but because of sag, their breast circumference wouldn't be very big.
#2 Who has biggest "area" of attachment of breasts?
For an explanation of this, look at pics of Maria Swan. The area that each breast is attached to her body is enormous, perhaps eight square inches.
Many women with large boobs have a much smaller area of attachment, and when they bend over, their breasts form teardrops because the area of attachment is only perhaps four or six square inches. This category isn't really important except that it is somethign to think about.
#3 Who has the biggest breast volume?
To me, volume is what we're talking about when we say "Biggest boobs". But... plusbig problem is measuring volume. The old bathtub method of using water displacement is problematic. Why? Because in the cases of many naturals, their breast tissue is less dense than water, and so would be squeezed together and therefore appear, by the measurement to be smaller than it actually appears to the naked eye.
I don't know how to remedy such a measuring problem, except to say perhaps a lazer-type "scan" of the boobs would show exactly how big they are without pressing them together.
I for one would be very interested to see how Chelsea "stacks" up with those hypermastogigantism patients. Right now, it's too close to call.
#4 Who has the biggest breast-to-waist ratio?
This is self-explanatory, and really it changes the issue of "biggest breasts" because it's saying PROPORTIONALLY who has the biggest.
Most men like thin women for their male fantasies, and outstanding examples of this category would be Minka.
However, a woman can be a BBW, and yet with the help of a corset, acheive incredible breast-to-waist ratio, see our own cute Buffie for examples.
#5 Who has the biggest breast-to-weight ratio? Or put another way, breast-volume-to-total-body-volume ratio?
Again, self-explanatory, with the small difference that for #4, a woman could be very tall or big all over, whereas fans of the small, petite yet huge-breasted woman would be interested in question #5.
Woman of interest: Sabrina/Anya/Merilyn. And Bettie from bettie.de
And so on and so on and so on.... there are so many delicious ways to quantify and measure breasts.... not enough time or breasts readily available to do so.....
Barnacle "because ze women vill have to do prodigious service along deez lines....they will have to be chosen for their sexual characteristics which vill haff to be of a highly...stimulating nature" Bill
But, before i get lambasted for objectifying women... let me say the above thoughts and measurements should only be approached from the standpoint that boobs are only a small part of a woman and these thoughts should only be had once a man has acheived warmth, camaraderie, laughter and emotional connection with a woman..... of course I realize this caveat is lost on 99% of the guys reading this....