Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #45 on: August 14, 2001, 12:47:00 PM »
I don't know about you guys, but I think that any man who can produce a fox like Jenna is A-OK in my book.  I caught her for the first time during the inauguration, and--let me tell you--she really made me reconsider my position to not-give-a-(insert expletive of choice) about politics.  I might even vote some day if I get her and free pizza as a door prize.

Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #46 on: August 14, 2001, 01:30:00 PM »
Yes this thread has wandered, and I helped.  Go get the implements of torture - I'll take my punishment like a man.

*

sheber

  • Shasta'man
  • 8577
    • http://www.bearchive.com/~shasta/
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #47 on: August 15, 2001, 02:40:00 AM »
How has the thread wandered? After all, aren't politicians boobs?
[Rent this space]

Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #48 on: August 17, 2001, 03:12:00 AM »
Another thing I don't get is why you all are saying that JLH has big breasts. She doesn't. Maybe compared to Callista Flockhart or someone...

But as to why people are attracted to people with money... it's because people with money can buy them stuff. Breasts don't buy you stuff... they're just there. Like 12-inch penises.


*

F_Cup_Fitzgerald

  • Banned User
  • 3590
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #49 on: August 17, 2001, 06:34:00 AM »
They wouldn't be that big on a large woman, but on a small-framed girl like JLH they are quite ample. And nicely shaped, as well, which is all part of the attraction.

For those who are attracted to Jenna Bush, try the "That's My Bush!" thread in the BEAddventure. It needs contributors, specifically those who lust after the President's daughter(s).


*

Prophet_Tenebrae

  • Breast Prophet
  • 4113
  • Prophet Of Darkness
    • FTF10 - FTF Superblog
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #50 on: August 17, 2001, 09:07:00 AM »
Jennifer doesn't get the fuss about breasts...I don't get the fuss about her.

Breasts are undoubtedly the greatest things in the multiverse and I have no doubt that if they didn't exist they'd probably have been invented!


*

Mammeister

  • Banned User
  • 2325
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #51 on: August 17, 2001, 10:21:00 AM »
Maybe not.

If we had evolved from marsupials, the teats would be hidden inside a pouch. So what would we males consider a turn-on then? Bigger pouches?  

What is it that gets kangaroos and koalas horny?  


*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #52 on: August 21, 2001, 05:59:00 AM »
Luvtygre:  
quote:

I don't know about you guys, but I think that any man who can produce a fox like Jenna is A-OK in my book. I caught her for the first time during the inauguration, and--let me tell you--she really made me reconsider my position to not-give-a-(insert expletive of choice) about politics. I might even vote some day if I get her and free pizza as a door prize.


Sorry my man, you got the wrong Bush. The real fox out of the First Twins is Barbara. Jenna ain't bad, but Babs beats the bloody bejesus outta her in the beautiful babes stakes! (And can I have two extra points for the alliteration?) As Stan Lee would say, "Make Mine Barbara!!!!"

Where was I? Oh yes.

I agree with Colette: Jennifer Love Hewitt doesn't have BIG breasts. What she does have are big boobies. There is a difference, though subtle, between boobies and breasts. For example, JLH has boobies. Dolly Parton, on the other hand, has breasts. Soleil Moon Frye (after reduction) has boobies. Anna Nicole Smith has breasts. See the difference?

AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

Prophet_Tenebrae

  • Breast Prophet
  • 4113
  • Prophet Of Darkness
    • FTF10 - FTF Superblog
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #53 on: August 21, 2001, 08:04:00 AM »
Not really, so while I think about it I suggest that you STAY away FROM my bins, otherwise there'll be TROUBLE!

*

MaxC

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 38
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #54 on: August 21, 2001, 01:45:00 PM »
TheZookie007, I see where you're going, but I think the difference between breasts and boobies doesn't really have anything to do with size.  JLH has boobies because her air-headed attitude mandates the use of the word "boobies" when talking about her assets.  I don't know about you, but trying to imagine her talk about her "breasts" just doesn't work for me.  Now, if I imagine her using the word "boobies" and think about her bouncing her empty head off of her shoulders a few times.... THAT seems to conjure up the appropriate image.

Collette, on the other hand, has breasts.  I try to imagine her asking me about her "boobies" and nearly start laughing (no, really... I did... I almost started laughing... just right then...) ahem....  I LOVE the fact that there is a web site for busty, brainy babes.  Intelligent women turn me on... period!  Not that you needed to know that... I just felt like sharing.  The point is, I personally equate the word "boobies" with a ditzy bimbo.

As for the "I don't understand the fascination with (insert appropriate mammary related noun here)" all I have to say is... I don't get the whole fascination with JLH... as I believe someone else has already stated in this thread.  I think money is the only thing she has going for her... because is SURE isn't talent.  I mean, I'm sure there are plenty of guys (or girls) that are attracted to her, but then again, how many are SAYING they're attracted to her because it's the "cool" thing to say?  Reminds me of the whole Cindy Crawford deal.  Sorry guys, but I've NEVER understood the puddles of drool over Cindy.  Sure she's nice to look at, but personally, I don't think she's the goddess she's been made up to be.  Given the choice (like it'll ever happen) I'd take Chloe over Cindy ANY DAY!!!

Now, I CAN think of one lady that has been in the spotlight for a long time and deserves the recognition... Raquel Welch (I hope I spelled that right.)  Raquel has breasts!  Raquel also has brains.  Raquel has talent.  I don't think I've ever heard Raquel talking about her boobies... and I hope I never do.  Anna Nicole can talk about her boobies... I already think she's a ditz... but if a girl needs to talk about her glands, I would recommend staying away from "boobies" if she is going for the "intelligent" appearance.

Whew!  I think that's more than two cents worth.  Can I get some change?

-Max C.


*

sheber

  • Shasta'man
  • 8577
    • http://www.bearchive.com/~shasta/
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #55 on: August 22, 2001, 02:59:00 AM »
Change? Change? I think you owe me after all that.  
[Rent this space]

*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #56 on: August 21, 2001, 03:17:00 PM »
The difference between breasts and boobies is gravitas.
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

F_Cup_Fitzgerald

  • Banned User
  • 3590
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #57 on: August 22, 2001, 11:47:00 AM »
I love Roberta Pedon and Rhonda Baxter, but I think gravitas has not been kind to them.  

*

RobertaFan

  • E Cup
  • 233
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #58 on: August 22, 2001, 03:15:00 PM »
*nothing* has been unkind to Roberta Pedon, from a biological standpoint.

Say you were to view a .jpg of Roberta, and you were to NOT notice the slightest amount of gravitational force pulling from the top of her breast....

.......it probably means you're viewing a morph, in other words, not a .jpg of Roberta.
To observe physics doing its thing on an original pic of her......is this to say that gravity has not been very good to her?

Whatever,
RobertaFan


*

F_Cup_Fitzgerald

  • Banned User
  • 3590
Re: Jennifer Love Hewitt MERGED
« Reply #59 on: August 22, 2001, 03:20:00 PM »
Don't get me wrong, RF, I am a big fan of both women, especially Roberta. As you know (!)