*

Laika_59

  • E Cup
  • 235
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #15 on: September 01, 2004, 05:12:01 AM »
Not her English accent, but her Scouse (Liverpool) one. Awful!

*

tomservo71

  • D Cup
  • 197
    • www.thefilmbasement.com
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2005, 11:56:16 AM »
Never heard of this chick until today and there's some disagreements as to her "naturalness".  Either way she's pretty smokin'.
Tom (Servo)

*

Sonic_Morph

  • F Cup
  • 636
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #17 on: March 31, 2005, 12:13:39 PM »
Fake, but as you said smokin.

*

joenny

  • G Cup
  • 1060
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #18 on: March 31, 2005, 12:35:41 PM »
Quote:

Fake




fo´ sho´?
I mean: any confessions, proofs etc.?

*

Blue

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 43
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #19 on: March 31, 2005, 12:56:37 PM »
Is there any evidence to suggest that?  I thought I had read that she was very much natural.  If anyone hasn't seen the pictures from the launch on her new lingerie line, I would reccomend it.

*

Sonic_Morph

  • F Cup
  • 636
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #20 on: March 31, 2005, 01:47:06 PM »
They look very fake to me.........too round to be natural.

 

I know it's a push-up bra, but cmon.......

*

somnophorev2

  • F Cup
  • 648
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #21 on: March 31, 2005, 03:50:43 PM »
From what I remember reading about her in various magazines and so forth she is 100% natural and even if she's not does it really matter? She is still amazingly hot and WAS a great reason to watch HollyOaks when she was in it, mind you, is still a fair few good reasons to watch HollyOaks  

*

RB

  • F Cup
  • 768
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #22 on: March 31, 2005, 04:57:08 PM »
She was in Brookside, not Hollyoakes.

If her tits are fake, she must have had them done when she was about 12 - because they've been as big as that since she started in Brookside as a young girl about 8 years ago.

*

spu00trb

  • C Cup
  • 83
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #23 on: March 31, 2005, 05:40:49 PM »
Heck if we're talking about hollyoaks then we should all remind ourselves of Darlene (as played by Sarah Lawrence). If anyone saw the episode on her birthday right before her brother threw her through a window she was almost bursting out of the dress she was in. She almost looked BEA size let alone real world size since she is so big for how tiny her frame is. And she looks pretty excellent in the calender too.

Ahh Hollyoaks, truly the greatest TV show ever. On no other show have so many serious issues been resolved by bikini pool parties.

*

Sonic_Morph

  • F Cup
  • 636
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #24 on: March 31, 2005, 06:33:17 PM »
Ah, Darlene......She was in a recentish issue of FHM looking amazing in a blue bikini. If anyone wants to dust off their scanner.......

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #25 on: March 31, 2005, 06:48:12 PM »
I seem to recall reading in a British website (the Sun? or maybe Ananova?) that she had bigger implants put in...I could be wrong though...

But, wow, does she have an eight-head (too big to be a forehead ) or what??
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

Blue

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 43
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #26 on: March 31, 2005, 08:48:08 PM »
Is seems to me that she is just always wearing the right bra.

*

spu00trb

  • C Cup
  • 83
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #27 on: April 01, 2005, 05:05:13 PM »
Then I applaud the bra makers responsible Although I still think she isnt exactly lacking in size!

*

jeffjaff

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 10
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #28 on: April 01, 2005, 06:10:27 PM »
I always though they were real. She was always 'big up-top' in brookie, and they seem to make out that she in natural in the lads mags. I go for real.

*

Blue

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 43
Re: Jennifer Ellison MERGED
« Reply #29 on: April 01, 2005, 08:32:21 PM »
Quote:

Then I applaud the bra makers responsible Although I still think she isnt exactly lacking in size!




Well yes, I never said she wasn't busty, I was refering more to the shape of her boobs.