Don't say that. They just figured out DST in Indiana. 
And as hard as it is for me to fall asleep during daylight hours, it's even harder to wake up when it's dark outside.
Actually the recent adoption to observe DST in Indiana was fueled by reasons to facilitate business hours with adjoining states and metropolitan areas such as Cincinnati, Chicago or Louisville. It had nothing to do with power saving.
In fact - because the entire state suddenly started following DST it provided a rare opportunity to actually test many of the long held assumptions about the benefits of DST.
For the first and only time a large population under "modern" energy consumption could be compared before and after the implementation of DST.
Basically most of the DST "benefits" do not hold up in the modern age.
1) There were NO power savings and due to the much more prevalent use of air conditioning there were some areas that actually used MORE power under DST when compared to the previous years because people would get home with more daylight hours which would cause them to cool for an additional hour. This research and findings were actually downplayed because it flies in the face of one of the major reasons of why we follow DST.
2) There was NO significant improvement is business now that the state was "synchronized" with its neighbors partially because it could only match up with states on either the eastern or central times zones and some areas now no longer have the "open an additional hour" effect.
3) Absent rates for workers and students now spike around the DST change dates.
4) Traffic accidents also show a spike within the state now.
5) Indiana farmers never had an opinion as the state did not observe it.
In all not much was gained be starting to observe DST.