Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
Topics: « previous next »
*

Candye Man

  • E Cup
  • 398
    • iCandye
Re: Okay, Guys: This Is Getting Theological
« Reply #30 on: April 12, 2005, 08:56:42 AM »
What the hell...just to add fuel to the fire...

These (attached) are three Tina photos from my own collection.  If the first one isn't a clumsy airbrush job, I'll eat my morph collection.  The second one is one of the earliest Tina photos I ever saw.  I would say 1984 would be a good guess as to when.  (Gotta hand it to Xavier...those things are pliable!)  The third photo is just for curiosity's sake.  I don't know who the model is, but it sure doesn't look like the usual Tina...even if she's wearing her breasts!
Logged
Too much of a good thing is WONDERFUL.  -- Mae West
*

doggo

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 4244
    • flyingrabbits.tv
Re: Sheber...shame on you...
« Reply #31 on: April 12, 2005, 08:57:15 AM »
 
Quote:

I have never seen A before in my life...


She appeared along with John Xavier's first Photoprints set, all the photographs being 3¼" square which ties in with the story of their having been Polaroids. It is hard to say if all of those shots were of Exhibit 'A'. The pictures were taken in various locations and varied in quality. They could well have been copied from the original prints using a Polaroid camera. Whoever Exhibit 'A' is, she's reasonably doggy.

Someone calling himself John Xavier existed round about the time of the publication of the Tina books. He was a photographer with an address in the Havant area. I spoke to him a couple of times on the phone.
Logged
doggo - the original doggo. There'll never be another
Flying Rabbits Video
And lots of other stuff
*

doggo

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 4244
    • flyingrabbits.tv
Re: Okay, Guys: This Is Getting Theological
« Reply #32 on: April 12, 2005, 09:10:37 AM »
 
Quote:

If the first one isn't a clumsy airbrush job, I'll eat my morph collection.


Looks like you'll be going hungry again; this is one of several heavy-handed retouching jobs.
Quote:

The second one is one of the earliest Tina photos I ever saw. I would say 1984 would be a good guess as to when.


Published by Photoprints in 1981, not to imply that they weren't taken some time before that date.
Quote:

(Gotta hand it to Xavier...those things are pliable!) The third photo is just for curiosity's sake. I don't know who the model is, but it sure doesn't look like the usual Tina...even if she's wearing her breasts!


In your selection, they all have the same hairstyle, and the faces aren't too dissimilar. To put it another way, I've seen others which look less like each other than these three. The later one, with the highly detailed nipples, was a girl with much more of a beak on her. If, as has been claimed, she had a nose job, she would have been well advised to ask for her money back.
Logged
doggo - the original doggo. There'll never be another
Flying Rabbits Video
And lots of other stuff
*

MunsterEddie

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 25
TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #33 on: July 16, 2005, 12:32:10 PM »
TINA SMALL MADE 2 VIDEOS, THE GIRL FROM PLANET X AND VISION X. DO ANY OF YOU GUYS KNOW IF/WHERE/HOW  I CAN GET TITANIC TINAS VIDEOS? {cant contact boobography and tina yahoo fan sites are spam sites and no one reads and answers posts]
Logged
*

dunlap02

  • D Cup
  • 165
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #34 on: July 16, 2005, 02:32:28 PM »
Logged
*

MunsterEddie

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 25
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #35 on: July 17, 2005, 09:37:53 AM »
ill give it a try. thank you.
Logged
*

herman_the_german

  • E Cup
  • 254
    • http://users.owt.com/jesyr/munstermemories/meet.HERMAN.html
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #36 on: July 19, 2005, 05:17:46 PM »
Looks like my son inherited his dad's good taste!!!

 
Logged
...Two men say they're Jesus, one of the must be wrong...
*

MunsterEddie

  • B Cup
  • *
  • 25
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #37 on: July 20, 2005, 11:51:20 AM »
greetings from the graveyard.  how is grandpa munster? sitiofan is all screwed up.  [i cant use it anyway, as i have dial up]. just curious. is sakura sena going to get her tits enlarged or not? her pay site changes format every month. theres no info there. and sometimes it has a message board and sometimes not. just wondering.
Logged
*

nbragh

  • A Cup
  • 1
    • boobography.com/
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #38 on: August 07, 2006, 10:39:33 AM »
Those Videos are exceedingly rare. We've been looking for them for years. Will post shortly a brief, terrible quality ;-) clip on the Tina Small page at boobography.com. Let me know if you make any progress on getting a source.
Regards, nb
Logged
*

DJPFC

  • Z Cup
  • 7571
    • http://www.pinupfiles.com
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #39 on: August 07, 2006, 11:02:21 AM »
The reason the videos are terrible qualilty is intentional -- Tina was one of the first (if not THE first) "latex" girls who donned a pair of latex rubber falsies and tried to pass them off as real boobs.  Every single shot of her is dark, grainy, soft-focus or just plain out-of-focus to conceal this fact, because back in those days they were even less convincing than the latex falsies (i.e. FarangDingDong, Mandy Mountjoy, Zena Fulsom, etc.) of today.

Here's a shot for reference that makes it abudantly clear that she was a latex-er...
Logged
Check out our brand new, fully re-booted mega-site, PinupFiles/PinupGlam!  Featuring the best and hottest big boobed pinup gals on the web!


*

jat470

  • E Cup
  • 336
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #40 on: August 07, 2006, 08:33:15 PM »
Ton of Tina Small clips here:

http://www.(prohibited V).com/(prohibited L)/movies01.htm

You'll need to buy a membership to access them but, like DJ said, they're not the best quality and from what I've seen of them, there are indeed latex.
Logged
*

DruulEmpire

  • Freakin' Huge!
  • 12880
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #41 on: August 07, 2006, 09:51:21 PM »
Ahhh, latex!
Logged
*

Bold_Dude

  • D Cup
  • 122
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #42 on: August 07, 2006, 10:18:20 PM »
Quote:

Here's a shot for reference that makes it abudantly clear that she was a latex-er...



Ah, yes.  I know that one well.  He nipples do look rather rubbery, but at least they have bumps.  Not convincing nips, no, but not far off.

A prime example of the later, larger, fuller Tina.  Presumably after the supposed lift described in her supposed 'Mr. Tu' autobiography.

Anyway, here's the earlier, smaller, less full Tina-- which is to say, nice to look at.  

Bold Dude
Logged
*

Brahma

  • E Cup
  • 1388
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #43 on: August 07, 2006, 10:37:48 PM »
Were the older ones latex as well?  In the earliest photos she has large but very saggy tits, then they become enormous and round.  Is it possible that she was an overendowed lady who then was convinced by a photographer to don the latex wonders?
Logged
*

Lesbian Bob

  • F Cup
  • 983
Re: TITANIC TINA SMALL
« Reply #44 on: August 07, 2006, 10:46:44 PM »
She wasn't latex (lacks the wrinkles all other latex models showed) but had a breast lift.  There were razor-sharp pictures of her after the operation, but the only ones I've seen are in B&W.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
Topics: « previous next »