*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #75 on: November 04, 2010, 08:10:12 PM »
 ::)
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #76 on: November 08, 2010, 03:15:43 PM »
 ::)
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #77 on: November 26, 2010, 10:54:16 PM »
 ::)
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

Lesbian Bob

  • F Cup
  • 983
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #78 on: November 28, 2010, 01:39:32 AM »
::)
That's the best print I've seen of that pic.  Do you have any more from the series?

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #79 on: December 04, 2010, 06:42:38 PM »
That's the best print I've seen of that pic.  Do you have any more from the series?

I'm looking. Meanwhile:
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #80 on: December 06, 2010, 12:16:41 PM »
From behind:
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

Lesbian Bob

  • F Cup
  • 983
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #81 on: December 06, 2010, 05:50:24 PM »
I'm also looking for a better and unaltered version of this picture:

*

SamV

  • My bra size? A 34H - H is for 'HUGE, you know!'
  • 2483
  • SaRenna Lee - the "Joan Holloway" prototype!
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #82 on: December 07, 2010, 11:06:53 AM »
Anybody else ever see this comic featuring Ms. Small? ::)
** SaRenna's very own Beta Baby **
The only thing in life you have to earn is love; everything else you can steal.
{ Recently Returned from Internet Limbo! }

*

Lesbian Bob

  • F Cup
  • 983
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #83 on: December 07, 2010, 11:47:26 AM »
Another:

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83863
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #84 on: December 07, 2010, 11:55:11 AM »
Anybody else ever see this comic featuring Ms. Small? ::)

Yes. That's late 70's or early, early 80's if I remember correctly.

*

titorteat

  • A Cup
  • 1349
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #85 on: December 07, 2010, 01:05:28 PM »
Bernard requested more of this:
|titor|

*

Hoogleboogle

  • E Cup
  • 419
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #86 on: December 07, 2010, 01:39:43 PM »
I am so glad to see another thread dedicated to this woman. She just doesn't get enough attention/threads around here.


Anyway, I am actually a friend-of-a-friend of Tina Small. Her breasts, which are 100% natural, were surgically reduced in the late 80s.

She divorced her husband soon after that.

Ah, the good old days. Back when I was a troll.
Boobs!

*

pedonbio

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 22949
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #87 on: December 07, 2010, 02:26:00 PM »
I want to clear up my "position" on the issues that arose in this thread. I never met any of the women known as Tina Small or Vicky Little. They were models who worked in Britain. There were several of them. The first time I saw photos of a model known as "Tina Small" was 1974 or 75 in discussing an issue with a client. I believe the magazine was Fling, but I am not certain. Several issues of Fling had spreads of at least two models with that name. The May, 1981, cover I posted earlier is, I believe, a different model.

All of the models used rubber prostheses, and I believe John Xavier was the agent for all of them. What I know of Xavier I heard from doggo.

The prostheses were very good, very well-done, and very expensive; it is not only possible, but likely, that the same prostheses were worn by different models over the years. Just like the Farong Ding-Dong site, the whole prosthetic-boob episode was an exaltation of fantasy, and should be remembered as such.

Here is a bad scan of a page from the second or third Tina in Fling:
« Last Edit: December 07, 2010, 02:33:15 PM by pedonbio »
Someday, chi1dren, this entire fuck-up will be yours.

*

Lesbian Bob

  • F Cup
  • 983
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #88 on: December 07, 2010, 03:17:37 PM »
All of the models used rubber prostheses, and I believe John Xavier was the agent for all of them. What I know of Xavier I heard from doggo.

The prostheses were very good, very well-done, and very expensive; it is not only possible, but likely, that the same prostheses were worn by different models over the years.
One thing all those prostheses had in common was how they wrinkled, similar to the wrinkling seem on smooth closed cell foam pool toys and life preservers when they're bent concave, and the prostheses weren't blended in very well at the top, where they met the skin.  No such effects can be seen in any of the Tina photos or videos, and while it's possible Tina wore better prostheses, I doubt it because she was the first super-size model, and I'd expect later models to receive better prostheses, rather than  worses.  Furthermore, Russ Meyer himself saw the proof in Tina (and couldn't stand John Xavier).


*

Gabe W

  • A Cup
  • 139
Re: Tina Small
« Reply #89 on: December 08, 2010, 01:20:13 PM »
One thing all those prostheses had in common was how they wrinkled, similar to the wrinkling seem on smooth closed cell foam pool toys and life preservers when they're bent concave, and the prostheses weren't blended in very well at the top, where they met the skin.  No such effects can be seen in any of the Tina photos or videos, and while it's possible Tina wore better prostheses, I doubt it because she was the first super-size model, and I'd expect later models to receive better prostheses, rather than  worses.  Furthermore, Russ Meyer himself saw the proof in Tina (and couldn't stand John Xavier).



if only Russ Meyers had done a movie with her