*

sheber

  • Shasta'man
  • 8577
    • http://www.bearchive.com/~shasta/
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #75 on: March 14, 2005, 11:37:28 AM »
...heh.















sheb "There is a fine line between 'derailed' and 'train wreck'" er
[Rent this space]

*

melonie_charm

  • G Cup
  • 1145
    • www.meloniecharm.com
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #76 on: March 14, 2005, 12:48:51 PM »
Quote:

I don't see why you would think that Elliot (or SCORE) would have more of a vested interest in Crystal Gunns or Busty Dusty than Tawny Peaks. While Crystal may be regularly featured in their magazine, and it's true that SCORE does produce the Busty Dusty Stash, it's also true that the SCORE Group launched (relatively recently) www.Tawny-Peaks.com.

I'm trying to see your point of view. What specifically do you think would be either Elliot's or SCORE's motivation for defending one model for whom they own/manage a site and not the other?




Even though others are expressing their opinions that this line of posts is off topic, I'm going to brave one more post in response to your question on the basis of unfinished business.  First a disclaimer - I'm not stating that any of my speculations are actually true  ... only that the possibility could exist.

Hopefully the possibility has been established that SCORE might in fact have a business reason to want to quickly quash other members' posts to the effect that Busty Dusty was a lesbian - on the grounds that if widespread speculation to that effect were to circulate it could ruin the 'stroke fantasies' of some male customers and thus potentially reduce signups at BustyDustyStash.  Elliot's stated reason for posting in regard to Dusty was 'very happy memories of a great woman I will never see again'.

In the Tawny Peaks O&A thread, the central issue boils down to whether or not Tawny was telling the truth when she stated that she had never done XXX.  A BEA member (improperly) posted a pic of Tawny with a SCORE copyright allegedly showing her engaged in anal sex.  Another BEA member speculated that the pic was simulated i.e. fake.  With Tawny's pride and O&A's entire argument at stake, who better   to authoritatively resolve this issue than the people who currently control Tawny's content and who also presumeably shot the original photo layout ?  Yet Elliot chose not to provide any input in that thread in support of Tawny or otherwise.

The possibility exists that if SCORE were to go on record to the effect that Tawny's alleged XXX content is in fact simulated or 'faked', as would be a direct consequence of any post made corroborating Tawny's statements, doing so could also have had the effect of discouraging potential new customers at TawnyPeaks.com who might have been factoring the existance of XXX content into their decision to sign up.  Silence on the part of Elliot/SCORE thus makes no official statement in regard to the existance of real versus 'faked' XXX content in Tawny's photo shoots, and leaves potential TawnyPeaks.com members free to assume whatever they want to assume.  Therefore where SCORE could arguably have had a business reason to quickly speak up in behalf of Dusty, they could arguably have the very same business reason to specifically avoid speaking up in regards to Tawny.  Of course it's equally possible that Elliot's memories of Tawny are not as 'fond', or 1000 other possible reasons.  

Hopefully this answers your question, and I will cease and desist.

*

sheber

  • Shasta'man
  • 8577
    • http://www.bearchive.com/~shasta/
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #77 on: March 14, 2005, 01:05:54 PM »
Instead of suppositions, hypotheses and accusations, why not go to the source and ask? For nigh on a decade we have all co-existed and interacted...I don't see why that should change now.
[Rent this space]

*

ggk

  • G Cup
  • 704
    • none
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #78 on: March 14, 2005, 01:12:58 PM »
Tawny Peaks is gone. Busty Dusty is gone. This is sad but true. Their photos remain, and remain great to look at.

 
Quote:

Yet Elliot chose not to provide any input in that thread in support of Tawny or otherwise.  



 
Elliot said he didn't comment because of financial reasons. Could we assume he is not a liar? Does anyone here know for a fact that he did not comment on Tawny for the reasons listed above? Why speculate on Elliot's motives?

*

RB

  • F Cup
  • 768
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #79 on: March 14, 2005, 02:11:41 PM »
Quote:

A BEA member (improperly) posted a pic of Tawny with a SCORE copyright allegedly showing her engaged in anal sex.




That was me.

Apologies if I breached anyone's copyright. It won't happen again.

I *did* reduce the size of the pic down, so as to make it pretty worthless in terms of a collection, which I hope redeems me in some small way.

*

melonie_charm

  • G Cup
  • 1145
    • www.meloniecharm.com
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #80 on: March 14, 2005, 02:27:06 PM »
Quote:

For nigh on a decade we have all co-existed and interacted...I don't see why that should change now.




I can only respond by saying that for nigh on 3 decades CBS news conducted business as usual ... I'm sure that Dan Rather didn't want to see a change occur either.

*

sheber

  • Shasta'man
  • 8577
    • http://www.bearchive.com/~shasta/
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #81 on: March 14, 2005, 02:44:19 PM »
That would only be pertinent if you or I were Dan Rather and the thread was about us.
[Rent this space]

*

Elliot James

  • SCORE Lord
  • 441
    • BeASCOREModel
    • Email
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #82 on: March 14, 2005, 02:59:14 PM »
It's getting way too weird in here. Tawny did at least three mid-90s softcore (which means NO penetration) still photo shoots with three different guys at John Graham's SCORE studio in London. Back then, newsstand magazines did not publish hardcore. If she can make 16 grand for her [censored] selling an old implant she had stored away, more power to her. If Melonie wants to hammer home the idea that I post at the BEA to push a fucking business agenda, which I do not, then screw it, I'm done for now. I don't have the time for this. Lorena can continue to refresh the SCORE gallery here if she and the mods want to but I'm tired of this pointless nonsense.
Elliot James
Editor
The SCORE Group
5001 NW 74 CT
Miami FL 33155
305-662-5959
[email protected]
http://www.BeASCOREModel.com
http://blog.scoreland.com/
https://twitter.com/elliot_james_

*

G_I_John

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 6884
    • gijohn.deviantart.com/
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #83 on: March 14, 2005, 03:09:58 PM »
Guys, gals, could we all just agree to disagree and talk about something a little less hostile

Busty Dusty is a legend, unfortunatly time moves on and careers must end. As one career ends, someone, somewhere starts a new career and 'carries on' where the other left off. In this case Busty Dusty retires, removes implants, Dee Dee buys implants, Dee Dee keeps the memory of Busty Dusty alive *or something like that* whilst having the most fun she can possibly have at the same time.

Did I make sense?... probably not but at least I tried to 'lighten' the mood and focus the attention back to the models and away from da bizness.

G_I "Ooo I used ghetto lingo... boo-yak-a-shark." _John
What's better than one woman having really large implants?... a forum full of them ^_^

*

ggk

  • G Cup
  • 704
    • none
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #84 on: March 14, 2005, 03:14:58 PM »
It sounds like we are about to get the Huge Tit equivalent of fox news! Does this mean we are about to see a bunch of giant breasted models that the mainstream huge boob media has been ignoring or not promoting?  If so, that is good news for big boob lovers.

*

Bambi_Blaze

  • X Cup
  • 2309
    • www.bambiblaze.com
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #85 on: March 14, 2005, 03:25:45 PM »
Quote:

It sounds like we are about to get the Huge Tit equivalent of fox news! Does this mean we are about to see a bunch of giant breasted models that the mainstream huge boob media has been ignoring or not promoting?  If so, that is good news for big boob lovers.




LOL!  And, Bill O'Reilly will host a "Big Tit Model" interview every Friday night....so stay tuned!  

  Pleeeeeezzzzzzz!  

*

Dick_Woods

  • X Cup
  • 1989
    • http://www.unlearnnow.com
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #86 on: March 14, 2005, 03:33:36 PM »
Actually John....you didn't make sense, although I do realize that you made your post with the best intentions.

This thread hasn't been about Dusty for a long time now. It has been about Melonie using any platform she can to dispense her anger and hate for SCORE, and whatever models that might be in their good graces. I beleive she does this thinking that it will ultimately help her freind and sometimes business partner Rhiannon (any connection she might directly have to Cleavage Magazine would be speculative) If nothing else they are good freinds, and have posed together and worked together at least a few times. These days any thread Melonie posts in winds up in some kind of debate about other people's careers, or SCORE. She can turn a discussion about the weather into an attack onpeople who she doesn't even know. Her facts are usually wrong.

I truly Hope that Rhiannon has no knowledge of any of this, and doesn't condone it, otherwise the REAL conspiracy here would be between her and Melonie trying to create hostility towards SCORE, whom they would be veiwing as their competition. That is certainly how it seems. If Melonie were not an incredibly busty woman, she would have been stopped a long time ago as a flamer. She makes accusations she cannot substantiate constantly, and ultimately, she will wind up hurting her freinds business.

...and before you reply Melonie...here is the difference between us...earlier in the day I had responded to Joi's post about Cleavage magazine, and had nothing but nice things to say. I can't recall the last nice thing you had to say about anyone that you weren't associated with.

*

Bambi_Blaze

  • X Cup
  • 2309
    • www.bambiblaze.com
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #87 on: March 14, 2005, 03:52:16 PM »
 
Quote:

I beleive she does this thinking that it will ultimately help her freind and sometimes business partner Rhiannon (any connection she might directly have to Cleavage Magazine would be speculative)




I directly asked Melonie this question and she unequivocally denied it in this thread.  However, I think anyone that has completely followed this thread (and a few others) can detect there is a motivation for her consistent disruptions along with propagations for a 'new' big boob industry.

*

ggk

  • G Cup
  • 704
    • none
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #88 on: March 14, 2005, 03:56:28 PM »
 
Quote:

  motivation for her consistent disruptions along with propagations for a 'new' big boob industry.




What I don't understand, is if there is a new explosion in the big boob world on the way, then why package it as a way to put down others in the biz?  New big boob models, or ones we don't know about because of the mainstream huge boob media doesn't let us know about them, would be absolutely music to all of our ears and eyes. True?

*

G_I_John

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 6884
    • gijohn.deviantart.com/
Re: Busty Dusty MERGED
« Reply #89 on: March 14, 2005, 03:59:19 PM »
Quote:

This thread hasn't been about Dusty for a long time now.




That's the point I was trying to make... or something similiar

G_I "At the rate this is deteriating (sp?) the thread will be locked soon *shrugs*." _John
What's better than one woman having really large implants?... a forum full of them ^_^