[MunchWolf]

It's the title of the bloodhound gangs cd with the 'you and me baby, do it like animals' song ...

-Munch "I hate sex on TV, I mean I keep falling off" Wolf

[D_U_S_K]

I see Munch's TV with a big hole in the speaker...

[JizzTits]

hehe, that was a good one Jessica!


*hates my stupid hard plastic TV with hard plastic speakers...*

[**DONOTDELETE**]

i love rhiannon's look!  second what you said d&j!

[Blax12]

Next post is a LONG LONG thread.

Read it only if you are interested on philosophy of boobs.


It is based on a thread we had around here about Mistress Rhiannon. Someone said she's horrible. I think she's not the conventional beauty. She is a kind of philosophical beauty.

Special thanks to the great master St. Stephan who edit this text (actually he did it 4 or 5 times) and helped me improving my puny english.

Blax12

[Blax12]

 
A NIETZSCHEAN VIEW OF BIG BOOBS AND MORPHING:
>WHY MISTRESS RHIANNON IS A MANIFESTO OF BEAUTY.

>This is in reply to

 A Hegelian view of morphing by Franz75

>"Man is a rope, tied between beast and overman--a rope over an abyss....
>What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end".
>
>The overman is the free spirit: the man who has set himself free from his
>own fears and limitations. The man who accepts his own reality. The man who
>seeks the will to power as his way to fulfill his life.
>

>According to Nietzsche, "man is a rope over an abyss". Man is not on one
>side of the ravine. Man is neither on one side nor the other. Man is not in
>a stable, defined, absolute situation. Man is not in a transcendental
>state,
>man is not timeless, man is not once and forever. Man is continuously in a
>state of change, he is restless, he is undefined, he is at a point over the
>ravine, but he doesn't know which point. He doesn't even know that it's a
>ravine and there are two solid rock faces to which the rope is attached. He
>only wonders about them. Man is without a point of reference. He doesn't
>know about himself, his situation, what's beyond and what's behind. He
>wonders about the absolute.
>
>Man wants to be sure of something, he wants points of reference, he's
>afraid
>of being lost.  Man has invented many things in order to put some points of
>reference around him, because he is scared by his loneliness,  he's scared
>of anarchy  (an + archè: without point of reference). He cannot judge
>without them, he cannot know anything and he is scared. In order to solve
>this problem, man has invented many things to fill that void: fate, God,
>political parties, nations. Anything was good, it just needed to be
>eternal.
>What's eternal is timeless, and what's timeless is not mutable, and what's
>mutable is an absolute point of reference.
>
>Plato invented ideas. Ideas were the point of reference, ideas were
>amorphous, timeless bases of everything around us. Everything has got an
>idea which is above human nature: there is the idea of horses (horsiness),
>the idea of man, the idea of everything. Under Christianity  God was the
>idea of ideas, He was the absolute and the eternal, all the ideas were in
>God. Even the idea of beauty.
>
>Over the centuries many philosophers have been looking for beauty.
>
>And common people sometimes speak about beauty; some say that beauty is
>what
>makes all men equal in that they recognize it. There are different forms of
>beauty, but there is one "BEAUTY": its idea.
>
>Societies, groups of men, developed canons of ideal beauty. Today we have
>tall, slim, blonde girls, for example. In Italy I could say it depends on
>the local scarcity of such women. But someone like Claudia Schiffer was
>commonly judged as "beauty". I suspect that this kind of woman is canonized
>as "beauty" also because of our Christian heritage: she's angelical, she is
>not "human", she is perfection, she is the idea. Every historical period
>had
>its canons of female beauty, something that was far from humdrum reality,
>something which was far from the human condition, something man liked
>because it conveyed their dream of perfection, so that the idea exists.
>
>Obviously Nietzsche's point (and my point, humbly) is that no idea exists.
>It is a deceit we turn against ourselves. Beauty is not something that
>leads
>man out of his manly nature; it is not something that leads him out of his
>condition, to achieve an eternal level. Beauty is something human, very
>human. Beauty is part of what Nietzsche called the will to power - which
>was
>not the craving for political/military power, or the conquest of the world,
>as some have misinterpreted Nietzschean thought. The will to power is the
>craving to fulfill our lust for life, our will to live.
>
>Sexuality is one point of this craving for life. Boobs are one sign of
>sexuality. Like in the prehistoric Venus, they are a sign of sexuality.
>They
>are a sign of our craving for life. Our love for boobs is sign of our will
>to power. They can change the size of the boobs into the "real" world by
>surgery. We can do it in the "graphic" world by morphing.
>
>Our craving for sexuality moves us to re-create. While in the real world we
>re-create reality, in the graphic world we don't re-create reality -
>because
>we are not talking about a world of real physical  objects, shapes, things
>we can touch. We are in a new dimension. We are into the bytes, that's the
>material our shapes are made of. While morphing we re-create our craving
>for
>sex and our will to live. We make it by our deepest instinct, sexuality,
>and
>we do that by turning out the shapes which are the shapes of our deepest
>desires. In our case abnormal tits. I think we don't even re-create. We
>create something new in a dimension which is completely new.
>
>We try to create "realistic" appearances in our morphs in order to convey
the dream that those boobs could be true. I mean there have to be no flaws,
no signs of retouching in our morphs. That's obvious because our only
knowledge of what's true comes from the real world. So we mix real-world
truth (no sign of our work) and our dreams (impossible dimensions of the
boobs). What's the main difference? We do our work in a world that has no
shapes but those we bring in with us in our minds. Plastic surgery does it
in a  world where we see real shapes and we can know if something, a tit in
our case, is natural or fake.

>We have a lot of fake boobs around. What's special about Mistress Rhiannon?
>The beauty of Mistress Rhiannon is the beauty of honesty: she's so damned
>obviously fake - precisely the signs of surgery - that she shows a truth
>that is usually "hidden". By plastic surgery they try to make fake boobs
>closer and closer to the real ones. Mistress Rhiannon's ones are obviously
>fake - not only in dimensions, but also in the signs. And why we should
>love
>something which is obviously fake? We could say we don't like it because  
>it
>doesn't convey the dream they can be true (natural, we'd say in the real
>world).
>
>We like them because, by flaunting their fakeness, she shows us that the
>re-creative power of plastic surgery exists. That our profoundest dreams of
>big boobs are brought to this real world. It is sure that somebody
>re-created it. Because it is self-evident. It is the beauty of conscious
>fiction: a true fake, if you'll allow the oxymoron. Hence just the opposite
>of what we aim at while morphing. There we don't want visible flaws
>(erasures, brushes, clones: they all have to be undetectable). But because
>we are in the world of no shape, a world made of bytes, no shape exists in
>front of us. In the world of no shape, beauty is what is close to shape;
>and
>shape is what we bring with us coming from the real world. In the real
>world
>where shape exists, beauty is what is evidently other than natural shape.
>In
>both cases the evidence of creation/re-creation is based on our cravings.
>
>Moreover, Rhiannon's beauty is a punk beauty. It spurns the canons of
>angelical and idealistic beauty. She is perversion and creativity. Where
>perversion is the fragmentation of all the statements, the rules, the
>canons. And creation, which comes after destruction, is our goal.
>
>
>
>Blax12
     

[Dick_Woods]

Yeah, well, that aside....we just think she's great looking. Without all the over analyzing. To each their own, but we'd "do" her.

Peace -D&J  

[MunchWolf]

I call camera man !!!!!!

-Munch "She's shaggable" Wolf

[JizzTits]

I call "extra hands"!  


and blax, while i'm not philisophical in any way... what your wrote is very well written and i think i even understood some of it. good job!

[pgolden]

I dunno, maybe I'd be singin' a different tune if she were naked in front of me, but I think she's starting to get too "out there" and is looking a lot more "whoa" everyday. She has a nice body and all, but it seems as if the skin in the center of her chest between her boobs is started to give way, almost like at any moment it might let go leaving her with like one big boob in the center of her chest. Anyone else notice this?  

[Jithero]

Yes, I have noticed it too, pgolden.  I guess its hard to avoid with those huge tits on such a tight little body.  Hopefully she can find some way of stapling it back down or something.

[jayluvsbe]

I'll take the audio engineer position.

"Munch, stop breathing so hard. It's getting on the tape."

blumphth <<< sound of Munch dropping camera and dropping to the floor

"Munch, wake up. We have a shooting schedule. Munch? Hey Munch?"  

[MunchWolf]

Wow ... must have been breathing too hard if you hear it over the sound of *fap fap fap* ...

-Munch "And that's getting on the tape too ... ewwww" Wolf

[MunchWolf]

No .. wait .. better ... it's a pump-action, pocket camera ...

-Munch "Beware of the flash" Wolf

[rtpoe]

I think I get it.....

Mistress Rhiannon is beautiful because she is honest about herself.

She is so obviously an exaggeration that there can be no question about her being "natural".

She is sufficiently strong in her sense of self that she is able to revel in her artificiality.

Her beauty is more in her personality than her person.

She knows what she has made herself - a big-boobed Goth dominatrix - and did it with the full intention of doing so.

Ummm.... I think I'm starting to ramble here. Better end it now, before I get incomprehensible.

rtpoe