There is no possible way beyond examination of the observational evidence we have to "prove" what we see; Beshine is the only one wo can "prove" her volume, so what is your point? I have stated the empirical evidence that I find proves my opinion; it goes far beyond pictures, yet you dismiss all of it without providing any evidence yourself beyond picture form. What evidence have you to explain all the other things I mention? I can understand you make believe that she only added a small amount of volume since 10k, but that falls far short of explaining the differences in physical aspects we witness; everything is profoundly different that in 2011 and you can see it in virtually every video over the past half dozen years, her movements far more conservative than the early years. Why is that if her boobs only weigh 3 pounds more each? Why does that cause fatigue now where id didn't before? Why do simple acts require Beshine to physically move her boobs now and support herself in bending? Why has her posture become more exaggerated, her fitness become more developed? Why did she only start mentioning "huge boob moments" years after 2011? Why is maintaining balance more difficult? At 10k, Beshine had an underboob fold that really does not exist today, is there another explanation other than substantial filling (think water balloon)? I have been making a lot of points beyond the visual, if they are not related to size/weight, why haven't you addressed the cause of any of them?
My posts are sometimes essay length to some (tiny essay in my humble opinion); please excuse me for trying to be explicit when making an observation as opposed to the intellectual "big tits." I am only trying to explain why I said what I said rather than just blurt out some observation but offering no explanation. I understand that most people do not read the actual studies in medical or scientific journals, preferring the less challenging or thought provoking obtaining all their knowledge from the headline, but that is not me; I want the facts and the rationale. Critical thinking, the ability to look at the facts available and formulate a logical conclusion is sadly lacking in society today and it is because people are to lazy to actually examine the evidence. The fact that I refuse to follow the simplistic but offer rationalization for what I am saying infuriates some, but just like those factual studies they ignore, no one is making anyone read them.
I have pointed out many changes that I have witnessed both from physical appearance to physical movements yet you are failing to explain a rationale behind any of them existing if not for a profound size and weight difference. Earlier this year, I created some pictures designed to illustrate size differences and I do not recall anyone refuting my observations, but when I create one not designed for that purpose, you object to something I was not even trying to present, yet again, fail to address what I was addressing. I have already explained my the rationale behind my opinion on your comparison picture, so don't pretend I concluded anything beyond the explanation I offered. Do you seriously believe a picture tells a better story than the physics on something where small differences, almost unnoticeable because of the overall size, make a huge difference in volume? It takes less than 3" diameter for the volume to double from 10k and there is a reason why Beshine's boobs no longer fit in chairs with arms; think about it.
I am not trying to sound condescending in my presentation, but just trying to present the evidence as I see it. You call me biased; perhaps I am, but that does not stop me from trying to be factual in any of my observations or estimates as to volume. I have actually done the homework, finding pictures/video where something of precise size is present for a proper comparison and then set forth to do the calculations, which are no better than estimates because her breasts are not a specific shape. At least I have been willing to spend the time and effort rather than take the easy way out.
You complain that my posts over the years are redundant; seriously, have you seen the posts of virtually everyone here but perhaps Nim? Some of the things I post mirror what Beshine is saying at a particular time or reflects on things she has said in the past, some are general observations that although mentioned previously, may be new to some. I didn't realize this offended you. Have I ever criticized the length or repetitive nature of your posts? While I may disagree with your opinion, I don't engage in ad hominem, but direct my comments to the content. Your efforts to disparage me based upon repetition and length are disappointing. I wish to be friends with everyone here, but if some actually believe that I must share their opinion, that I am not permitted to have my own opinion, they are not being friendly. I normally choose to not respond to differing opinions, but only challenge disparaging remarks or what I believe to be factually inaccurate.
I do agree with your last sentence; Beshine is great, she really loves her huge boobs, and that there is room for skepticism, though it should be within realistic bounds. This said, I have drawn criticism many times for mentioning precisely this information and expounding upon the rationale behind my observation. There are just so many headline readers here that think everyone should be limited to "nice tits." So intellectual, so disappointing.