[solvegas]

Does Beshine still do custom videos and respond on Onlyfans?

I don't belong there at OnlyFans, but Bombayduk definitely does, so I'm sure he'll respond to you. 

To the best of my knowledge, Beshine does not offer custom videos.  People ask, even suggest, but I have not seen any evidence that she does.  Everyone should realize that the picture she posts today may have been taken a couple months ago, so making a video isn't as if the circumstances haven't changed.

I think it was over a year ago, Sol, that you remarked how pictures seldom got 100 views, indicative of less BEA participation.  For a couple months, I checked and found that many, if not most, did get 100 views by the 30 day mark.  Well, I decided to check again and see if this was still true.
To find a picture with 100 views, we now have to go back months.  In fact, since last January, there have been only a couple hit that mark, ironically, one was a morph, that have always drawn less clicks than real pictures.  Captain, AD, CB, and the user gallery guys you regularly cite do fine work, but the evidence suggests people like the real Beshine.
Interests change and alternatives have only expanded over the nearly 30 years since the BEA was founded, but one thing that you can always point to when assessing the demise of a site is the sniping and infighting, which causes people to walk away.  I can point to this thread (and two others), where this went on for months on end, essentially by a single individual here, and see that "views" declined; a year ago, you might see 60-120 likes after 30 days, now it is more like 30-70.  Does that seem about accurate to you?  Have people sought alternatives that have less negativity?  As for me, I wish to keep posting respectful of Beshine and others that share my interests, opining about aspects I find interesting, and hoping others join in the conversation.

When the 'check oil light' comes on, it is always best not to ignore it like Penny, but to check it out quickly to avoid damage.

Yes, this site has declined since I first joined it officially in 2003, even though I started looking at it in December of 2001, and if you look at the site statistics, you can see that guys that used to be important like Palomine, gonzo, Zookie007 and more have been gone. There used to be another BEA, the Breast Enhancement Archive, but that one died a little while ago. This one is still alive, but it is not as busy as it was. 

[Bombayduk]

Yes, those who were one as heavily vested in posting as you are, are no longer, with only Salem even close.  My interests are not as diverse as those posting a lot, but I do appreciate their interests, even if I do not share them, and I also appreciate how Salem digs up these posts, not used for 20 years, but still relevant today.  I just ran across one last posted in 2005 while searching for a name, but can't recall what it was now, only that it was relevant and deserved to be revived.

If I remember right, that other BEA was started by a regular poster here than for some reason ran afoul of the rules.  In the early years, with a number of mods, posts were screened quite well, warnings were issued and like points on a drivers license, if you didn't heed the warnings, your membership was suspended.  It is too easy to accidently run afoul of the rules, which IMHO, are quite antiquated by today's standards, but we have no choice but to try to abide, maybe even remind others when you see a problem, but doing so without coming off like you are a moderator yourself.

When this site was first created, server space was at a premium, and I have a feeling money is the reason for the switch of serves a few years ago, from GMT to CST.  Though I imagine participation will continue to decline, addressing some of the certainly would slow the progression.  Imagine a site where I can write fuck, but not innocent words like **82** and forced.  Often the need to use 10 words best described by a single banned word is frustrating, yet no one has ever thought it would be a good idea to revisit this list of banned words.

[Bombayduk]

Just another point; I was told (not by a mod) that AI cannot be posted on any threads not specifically designated AI, to which I replied, with the advancement in AI images, how could one possibly know with actually knowing everyone on the face of the earth.  If this is in fact a rule, it is certainly antiquated.

Two days ago I posted an AI picture here; that is not Beshine, but an AI replication of a OF picture.  I feel it demonstrates an accurate depiction and hopefully without breaking the rules regarding AI, while both illustrating my contention and hopefully, awakening people to this is how Beshine actually looks today on her back.  To be fair, almost all the pictures show her breasts following her chest wall, thus they are seemingly always within 1" of touching her chin, and most often, Beshine tilts just slightly to one side to avoid having to use her arms to prevent her breasts from falling towards the sides, always leaving one on the surface and the other pointing skyward.  It is her "boob wall," preventing her from seeing anything beyond them.  But you have to join for a month to see all the 2,000+ pictures and witness her growth.

[Miggieknows]

Just another point; I was told (not by a mod) that AI cannot be posted on any threads not specifically designated AI, to which I replied, with the advancement in AI images, how could one possibly know with actually knowing everyone on the face of the earth.  If this is in fact a rule, it is certainly antiquated.

Two days ago I posted an AI picture here; that is not Beshine, but an AI replication of a OF picture.  I feel it demonstrates an accurate depiction and hopefully without breaking the rules regarding AI, while both illustrating my contention and hopefully, awakening people to this is how Beshine actually looks today on her back.  To be fair, almost all the pictures show her breasts following her chest wall, thus they are seemingly always within 1" of touching her chin, and most often, Beshine tilts just slightly to one side to avoid having to use her arms to prevent her breasts from falling towards the sides, always leaving one on the surface and the other pointing skyward.  It is her "boob wall," preventing her from seeing anything beyond them.  But you have to join for a month to see all the 2,000+ pictures and witness her growth.

So many pictures and the joy of the journey Beshine has been going on and still going with her massive BOOBS adventures and it’s seen how much Beshine boobs has grown over the years and so beautiful and sent she is always !

[Miggieknows]

Hey guys just to say hello and also
If yall haven’t seen OF Beshine … she posed a pic of her frontal view and holy smokes brothers !!
Beshine looks so massive enormous immense and wider boobs , her boobs are so much larger wow just wow mindblowing to see how much beauty and sexiness …

[Bombayduk]

Hey guys just to say hello and also
If yall haven’t seen OF Beshine … she posed a pic of her frontal view and holy smokes brothers !!
Beshine looks so massive enormous immense and wider boobs , her boobs are so much larger wow just wow mindblowing to see how much beauty and sexiness …

The reason a short lens (convex) is a preferred choice for her photos is that the short lens keeps everything in focus, both near and far; without being behind the camera to adjust the focus blurry pictures would result.  At one time, when 35mm cameras were the thing, you had to know a lot of the eccentricities of photography when using various lenses and filters, from choosing the right lens to F stops and shutter speeds depending upon conditions, but compared to the phone oriented cameras today, you could get really creative.  Today, computer programs alter the images afterwards.
So the bottom line is, her boobs were closer, so that makes them look much larger. 

[solvegas]

Hey guys just to say hello and also
If yall haven’t seen OF Beshine … she posed a pic of her frontal view and holy smokes brothers !!
Beshine looks so massive enormous immense and wider boobs , her boobs are so much larger wow just wow mindblowing to see how much beauty and sexiness …

The reason a short lens (convex) is a preferred choice for her photos is that the short lens keeps everything in focus, both near and far; without being behind the camera to adjust the focus blurry pictures would result.  At one time, when 35mm cameras were the thing, you had to know a lot of the eccentricities of photography when using various lenses and filters, from choosing the right lens to F stops and shutter speeds depending upon conditions, but compared to the phone oriented cameras today, you could get really creative.  Today, computer programs alter the images afterwards.
So the bottom line is, her boobs were closer, so that makes them look much larger. 

Are you saying that todays photography is not truthful Bombayduk? 

[Bombayduk]

Hey guys just to say hello and also
If yall haven’t seen OF Beshine … she posed a pic of her frontal view and holy smokes brothers !!
Beshine looks so massive enormous immense and wider boobs , her boobs are so much larger wow just wow mindblowing to see how much beauty and sexiness …

The reason a short lens (convex) is a preferred choice for her photos is that the short lens keeps everything in focus, both near and far; without being behind the camera to adjust the focus blurry pictures would result.  At one time, when 35mm cameras were the thing, you had to know a lot of the eccentricities of photography when using various lenses and filters, from choosing the right lens to F stops and shutter speeds depending upon conditions, but compared to the phone oriented cameras today, you could get really creative.  Today, computer programs alter the images afterwards.
So the bottom line is, her boobs were closer, so that makes them look much larger. 

Are you saying that todays photography is not truthful Bombayduk? 

Truthful and in proper perspective can certainly be different.  Whenever you see a photo and everything, both near and far, is in focus, it is the result of a shorter lens, like on your phone.  Everything depends upon the distance from the lens, the "things may look smaller" in the mirror perspective, because that is what convex does; disproportionately makes things further away look even smaller than the naked eye would see, and things nearer become disproportionately larger.  But when you want everything to be in focus, like a scenic picture, you choose the short lens, thus eliminating much of the need for focusing.   On the other end of the spectrum is telephoto; a 600mm lens can capture the subject at 150' in full frame, yet everything nearer and farther becomes a blur, which adds to the creativity and intimacy.

[solvegas]

^ Well, to be honest, I've never been a proficient photographer. 

[Miggieknows]

Even though that’s true of what you say about camera angle focus and etc ….
Beshine boobs look super massive in these shots and yes they look larger but she is MASSIVE still in boobs

[wolpertinger]

The reason a short lens (convex) is a preferred choice for her photos is that the short lens keeps everything in focus, both near and far; without being behind the camera to adjust the focus blurry pictures would result.  At one time, when 35mm cameras were the thing, you had to know a lot of the eccentricities of photography when using various lenses and filters, from choosing the right lens to F stops and shutter speeds depending upon conditions, but compared to the phone oriented cameras today, you could get really creative.  Today, computer programs alter the images afterwards.
So the bottom line is, her boobs were closer, so that makes them look much larger. 
Truthful and in proper perspective can certainly be different.  Whenever you see a photo and everything, both near and far, is in focus, it is the result of a shorter lens, like on your phone.  Everything depends upon the distance from the lens, the "things may look smaller" in the mirror perspective, because that is what convex does; disproportionately makes things further away look even smaller than the naked eye would see, and things nearer become disproportionately larger.  But when you want everything to be in focus, like a scenic picture, you choose the short lens, thus eliminating much of the need for focusing.   On the other end of the spectrum is telephoto; a 600mm lens can capture the subject at 150' in full frame, yet everything nearer and farther becomes a blur, which adds to the creativity and intimacy.

Very comprehensive lesson about (analogue) photography. Oh, the good old days, where no one would photograph fast-food meals.

[Bombayduk]

At one time, I had three 35mm cameras, an assortment of lenses and filters, plus all the usual equipment, from different tripods to everything you need to get creative.  But truth be told, when you have to adjust your aperture and speed for every lighting condition and focus quickly, more than half of a roll of film was wasted; today you just hit 'delete' and try again.  But using a 1/2000th of a second shutter speed, I could make the props of a plane stand still, and using my long telephoto, I would take pictures of friends from so far away that they never knew I was there, through a crowd at a market in Nassau, with only them in focus, everything else a blur, and using stacked filters, create a violent sunset from the bow of a cruise ship in the afternoon.  Now the equipment just sits in a closet; carrying a 50# bag of equipment kinda kills the buzz when touring.

[Miggieknows]

Beshine posted a pic today and my my my it’s so noticeable how massive and ginormous her boobs size is looking so sexy and beautiful she is !

[Bombayduk]

Beshine posted a pic today and my my my it’s so noticeable how massive and ginormous her boobs size is looking so sexy and beautiful she is !

Despite her top almost blending into the background, it is hard to dispute her enormous size.