While clearly not camera angle, each breast is probably a few times the volume of her head. While I love the idea of Beshine actually being the size certain camera angles and short lens imply, I am always disappointed when reality proves she is not. That said, the camera will never do her justice compared to how huge her breasts would look if she were right in front of you.
ah ok and you are a videographer or photographer, which i using the same camera set as beshine is using it? 
Back in the day when camera settings were all manual and you had to know what you were doing, I had multiple 35mm cameras, the full assortment of lens, filters, and equipment. All just stuck in a closet now that everything is digital and quite honestly, it was difficult to enjoy myself often lugging 30+ pounds of camera equipment around, but if you want really good and creative pictures, that is what you do. Back around 2012, Beshine listed her impressive equipment, but with 4K, she obviously upgraded since.
On Beshine's site, the retro release has been moved back 4 years, which is a good thing for long time fans that have seen it before and are looking for something new. Though it would have been overtly obvious that they are 10+ year old pictures, others are not so obvious and assigning some sort of chronological order to picture/video sets is not much more than an educated guess based on little more than hair length and location of the shoot. 2019 was such a year, with hair lengths and locations that would signify multiple years, from 2016 to 2019. When we talk about if Beshine is continuing to expand her breasts, the lack of continuity always adds to the doubt by some and the fact that another liter will hardly make a notable difference today doesn't make it easier. however, at least 2020 has seen more consistency; everything but one video has Beshine with longer hair (extensions?) that was first apparent last fall when most of what we are seeing was actually shot. Personally, I believe she adds a little each year, and this conservative approach, as lolchair pointed out, has led to Beshine maintaining healthy looking skin. She has always proven herself to be ahead of the game and continues to do so.
nice to know that you had a good camera set in the past, but as i have asked you before. do you have knowledge about the camera settings or equipment of beshine? 
when i was reading your posts from the past it seems that you have a lot of knowledge about the current camera sets, for example which lenses were used, which camera exactly and what kind of „distortion“ those have etc.
i am not a photographer or videographer or have knowledge about any technical functions of those and if i would have that who cares at a breast expansion board? and if you care, then you have to write it at other threads too. 
i guess it is unbelievable for you how huge beshine is and there must be a camera trick or something similar. that is how it sounds to me when i am reading your posts. yes, you are writing nice things too, but why do you need to write again and again and again something about „that must be the camera, the lenses, the angle or distortion…“ at beshines thread?
others models are doing weird camera angles, using maybe those fisheye lenses or the quality of the pics are lousy and so on and so on and so on, but at the posts of you at other threads you do not say that. only here at this thread. ok, i have not read all posts of you in detail because that would take hours 
but a few and that was quite enough for me 
every girl is doing angles, but you as a „hobby“ photographer are you not interested to let your model look like the best? show her from the best side? let the girl or model feel the best in front of the cam and when she is seeing the pics that there is a big smile at her face? than the model is feeling good and this is what you, a fan, want to see at a vid or pic. your fav model smiling, being happy and showing you the best of herself.
i do not want to attack you, but in my opinion we have to treat those girls fair, let them feel comfortable and let them know we are fans of what they are doing. am i happy with everything what beshine is doing? of course not, but i have no reason why i should write all points in detail here. that is disrespectful towards beshine and will not change anything.
as i have written at my first post here. when i am reading this thread from the beginning to the end i am sitting with a shake of my head in front of my computer.
bytheway solvegas, this post is addressed to you too.
No one knows exactly what Beshine uses as camera equipment beyond what she has disclosed, but rest assured, she has quality equipment. The basic function of a lens length is the same across whatever equipment you choose, so your question seems quite naive, but I expect many people would stumble if they have never used a SLR. Clearly, Beshine has automated equipment to adjust light and focus versus old style where you had to have an understanding of aperture and shutter speed settings before manually focusing, however, I have to imagine they can be overridden to capture certain aspects.
With or without a basic understanding, most people understand basic principles, like closer objects appear larger. A lens can amplify that effect while another diminishes the effect. One lens will create a greater depth of field while another reduces it. A short lens has the propensity to keep much more in focus, but distorts close images, a longer lens gives a more accurate picture, but things in the foreground and background lose focus.
If you are a member of Beshine's site and know anything about photography beyond your cell camera, you can identify likely lens lengths by the results. There are substantial reasons why Beshine would choose a lens of 50mm or less in most situations, the primary being focus and depth of field. The results may be overtly obvious, particularly distortions when objects are closer to the lens, but with a very short lens, even background objects are often warped. This is why photographers do not use a short lens for portraits; even in the studio, you will see a lens of 85mm or longer because they want to minimize distortion and don't care about depth of field.
When you see Beshine standing there and both she and things that appear a mile behind her are in focus, you can bet it is a shorter lens, and so long as she is not too close to the camera, the image is fine. Closer objects appear much larger and farther objects appear much farther away they they actually are. Are you the least bit familiar with computer cams? If not, go to Beshine's site and click on the cam shows and you will see precisely what I mean because the lens used is extremely short on those cams. The window behind Beshine looks maybe 8' away, but it is more like 2' behind her.
You can believe what you want to believe, but there are reasons why a breast looks 3x the size in one photo than in another and it all comes down to, not magic, but lens length and distance. I have a very realistic perception of how big Beshine's breasts are, do you? I have serious doubts since you do not seem to understand basic photography. I seldom make critical mention of the photography unless the results represented Beshine unfairly, and if you think I am talking about her breast size , you are grossly mistaken; I am always primarily concerned with her face and wish the pictures capture her beauty. Using a short lens for overhead pictures focused on her breasts will always unfairly distort her face, pure and simple. If you cannot comprehend that, I suggest you do some homework before debating aspects of photography. It has nothing to do with best angles, it has to do with capturing best images.
If I did not approve of what Beshine was doing, I would not frequent this thread or be a member of her site. Any desire I have regarding her images are always to have them capture her beauty. If you have followed this thread, you may find that I am quite selective in the pictures I post, frequently choosing ones where her face is of primary concern, but often ones that depict her breasts as larger (simply because I like that thought) secondary to camera distance. I suffer from no disillusionment or denial about what creates the discrepancy between overtly obvious breast sizes and I do not blame her husband for wanting to closely focus on a breast every now and then, I certainly would.
"i do not want to attack you, but" is just like saying "I don't mean to sound condescending, but" and that is exactly what you mean to do when you start a sentence as such. Though I heap more praise on Beshine than the vast majority of people here, you want to lecture me on what I can or cannot say. I am quite happy that Beshine reads this thread and has apparently taken cues from what I have posted in a variety of ways, because everything I say is either in admiration or in hopes of improving her image; if anyone is going to criticize, let it be constructive criticism and provide solutions, not just whine and cry about what you don't like. But before you go about whining and crying about Beshine or what others post, try to be respectful of their opinions; often silence is the best option, however, if you must, be factual in any rebuttal; hurt feelings are not factual.