[danni]

Quote:
rasiert said:

Quote:
Applebox said:
found around.  not my work..

Exelent Work!

They look like a women who is 43 yrs old and had a couple of little ones.  Saggy and sucked dry - yuk

[Carter]

Quote:
danni said:
They look like a women who is 43 yrs old and had a couple of little ones.  Saggy and sucked dry - yuk

I seem to recall we have a rule about insulting models... and since a 30 day ban didn't do the trick for your last Christinamodel violation, let's try 60. Next time you're outta here for good.

[Kenard]

Christina might be a canidate  for implants.  As much as I would like to see her return her former self, it might be her best option now.

[GALVATRON]

Quote:
Cheviot said:

Quote:
danni said:
They look like a women who is 43 yrs old and had a couple of little ones.  Saggy and sucked dry - yuk

I seem to recall we have a rule about insulting models... and since a 30 day ban didn't do the trick for your last Christinamodel violation, let's try 60. Next time you're outta here for good.

bwaaahhhh!

We're not allowed to insult models? Does that rule extent to any and everybody? How about politicians and hollywood stars? If not, it should. Models put themselves out there in the public eye, just as our beloved **28** do. Models are just less adored on a wide scale.

And what exactly constitutes an insult? Is it an intent sort of thing? In this last example I'm guessing it would be the "yuk".
Otherwise, we would take it that it's an insult to be 43. Well, I happen to know that some people think 43 is not old. (Not me though, I don't trust anyone over 35) Or, is the  "she looks like she had little ones" part an insult? Is parentoohd now considered an insult?  Some people go out of their way to portray women as MILFS, even without evidence. Or was it the "saggy and sucked dry"? I happen to like tiny bit of a sag sometimes. It lets you know they're real. I guess the sucked dry is slightly insuting in the context of a big boob forum. Again I ask, is it the intent that moderators look at to deem a comment an insult? It appears that is the case, if so, the above comment was clearly intended as an insult. But, what about backhanded compliments? Are they an offesne?

Perhaps I will use a hypotheical... Let's say there was a model, and she's hot. we'll call her Kristana. Now, let's say there was a poster who, may or may not be a giant robot, was a fan of this model. Now let's say this model was beautiful but for some reason, in all of her product, she goes bass fishing. But that's not the wierd thing. Let's say she goes bass fishing each and every shoot, but she never catches a fish. Now, let's say aforementioned poster mentioned how this model sure was pretty but she sucked ass at bass fishing. Would this be considered an insult. If so, just let me go on the record as saying ...

 Everyone is good at whatever it is they try to do and no one can ever possibly be bad at anything they attempt, and Zod made everyone beautiful, even Joseph Merrick, who's bones would make a lovely decoration for my house.

[hangin2low]

Quote:
GALVATRON said:

Quote:
Cheviot said:

Quote:
danni said:
They look like a women who is 43 yrs old and had a couple of little ones.  Saggy and sucked dry - yuk

I seem to recall we have a rule about insulting models... and since a 30 day ban didn't do the trick for your last Christinamodel violation, let's try 60. Next time you're outta here for good.

bwaaahhhh!

We're not allowed to insult models? Does that rule extent to any and everybody? How about politicians and hollywood stars? If not, it should. Models put themselves out there in the public eye, just as our beloved **28** do. Models are just less adored on a wide scale.

And what exactly constitutes an insult? Is it an intent sort of thing? In this last example I'm guessing it would be the "yuk".
Otherwise, we would take it that it's an insult to be 43. Well, I happen to know that some people think 43 is not old. (Not me though, I don't trust anyone over 35) Or, is the  "she looks like she had little ones" part an insult? Is parentoohd now considered an insult?  Some people go out of their way to portray women as MILFS, even without evidence. Or was it the "saggy and sucked dry"? I happen to like tiny bit of a sag sometimes. It lets you know they're real. I guess the sucked dry is slightly insuting in the context of a big boob forum. Again I ask, is it the intent that moderators look at to deem a comment an insult? It appears that is the case, if so, the above comment was clearly intended as an insult. But, what about backhanded compliments? Are they an offesne?

Perhaps I will use a hypotheical... Let's say there was a model, and she's hot. we'll call her Kristana. Now, let's say there was a poster who, may or may not be a giant robot, was a fan of this model. Now let's say this model was beautiful but for some reason, in all of her product, she goes bass fishing. But that's not the wierd thing. Let's say she goes bass fishing each and every shoot, but she never catches a fish. Now, let's say aforementioned poster mentioned how this model sure was pretty but she sucked ass at bass fishing. Would this be considered an insult. If so, just let me go on the record as saying ...

 Everyone is good at whatever it is they try to do and no one can ever possibly be bad at anything they attempt, and Zod made everyone beautiful, even Joseph Merrick, who's bones would make a lovely decoration for my house.

whaaa . . .

[Bonecracker]

Quote:
Cheviot said:

Quote:
danni said:
They look like a women who is 43 yrs old and had a couple of little ones.  Saggy and sucked dry - yuk

I seem to recall we have a rule about insulting models... and since a 30 day ban didn't do the trick for your last Christinamodel violation, let's try 60. Next time you're outta here for good.

 Dear Cheviot,
Ths user "danni" did not insult a model or any other saintly individual.  The user merely passed commentary, opinion, as is routinely done here by one and all.  

This is harsh treatment, not unlike the Spanish INquisition.  or perhaps other notable items of disturbance, is he guilty of thought crime?  Others have stated similar things over the past few years.

Regards,

Bone...  

[espy]

Quote:
Bonecracker said:

Quote:
danni said:
They look like a women who is 43 yrs old and had a couple of little ones.  Saggy and sucked dry - yuk

 Ths user "danni" did not insult a model or any other saintly individual.  The user merely passed commentary, opinion, as is routinely done here by one and all.  

My son, who is far too young to participate here, could easily identify the blatantly obvious insult in Danni's post.

Just saying...

[Odin]

Looked like an opinion to me.

Slightly abrasive and misput, but an opinion.

It's not like he said "OH MY FUCKING GOD I HATE THAT BITCH SHE'S SO FUCKING UGLY IT'S LIKE SATAN SHAT ONTO A DOG AND THEN EAT IT AND THEN THREW IT UP AGAIN AND THAT'S WHAT HER BOOBS ARE TOTALLY LIKE".

He just made the quite obvious comparision that her breasts aren't in the same amazing condition they once were.

[hangin2low]

Intriguing.

This must be BEA's Appeals Court in session (or maybe not) . . .

[Carter]

Quote:
Odin said:
He just made the quite obvious comparision that her breasts aren't in the same amazing condition they once were.

And had he said what you just said he wouldn't have been temp banned again.

Again? Yes, again. Danni has been termp banned in the past for posting personal information about Christina model. Now I'm no big Christinamodel fan, but I do know most people never say anything with regards to a model to get temp banned even once, but when you see a user go back to the same place that got them temp banned last time, you start to realize that it's time for a bigger hammer.

Listen, no one cares if you say a model could stand to gain a few pounds, is a horrible dancer or is WICKED bad at bass fishing. But direct and personal insults about a model's appearance are out of line, and prohibited.

It's not a new rule.

[EvilDorito]

I really haven't much to say....except its no wonder I'm mostly on lurk-mode on here.

And while I would (and was itching to do so) add a new pic of Christina to this thread...I suddenly remembered that they're from her [censored] page. And we're not allowed to post so imagery here. So I shall not be posting it because I wouldn't want some hammer to fall upon me. Unwarranted or otherwise.

Yes rules are rules. But lets not make mountains out of molehills.

[hangin2low]

Quote:
EvilDorito said:
<clip>
But lets not make mountains out of molehills.

<heh heh> Luckily, you're not talking about her tits, right? . . .

[Hugeboobfan]

Quote:
EvilDorito said:
I really haven't much to say....except its no wonder I'm mostly on lurk-mode on here.

Seconded.

[MrWhipple]

Delurks* Third *Relurk

[Carter]

Sigh.

Somehow 99.9% of the people who post on these forums never manage to post anything that comes even close to violating any of the rules, yet when someone does violate the rules, it's these same people that moan and gripe that the sky is falling and that they never post lest the evil and mighty mods smite them.

Please.

Compared to most forums we give people second chance after second chance until we all but have to ban offenders so they won't just do whatever they please.  In this case, not only had the poster had prior rules violations, they had a violation about the same model, where they revealed personal information about her.

Remember, every time a rule is created, it's been in response to actions taken by forum members.

We never had a rule about insulting models until forum members said vile things about models who USED to visit the forums.

We never had a rule about divulging a models personal information until a forum member decided posting a models real name and address was a good plan.

We never had rules against photos from certain social networking sites until forum members created fake over-18 profiles and posted photos there to legitimize the under-18 pictures they found on an under-18 profile.

If people would just grow up and act like reasonable people we wouldn't have to have all these rules.

So don't blame me when someone gets banned. I don't make the rules or even agree with all of them. If you're looking for someone to blame, blame yourselves.