*

Commish

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 14
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #75 on: December 14, 2001, 01:09:00 AM »
Stumbled across this UK escort service web site http://www.uk-glamourgirls.com/  and there under the name "Linda" are clearly pictures of the one and only LDM as an escort available for 1,000 pounds for 3 hours!  

I am not naive and know that these services thrive on bait and switch tactics, however the site seemed very credible.  Also, they have a stunning array of other busty models seemingly available.  I am located in the States, but would swim the Atlantic to get to London if this was legit !

I wonder if any of our members across the pond could check this out as to its legitimacy?  It's probably bogus, but you never know . . .


*

MrHHH

  • L Cup
  • 2985
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #76 on: December 13, 2001, 05:42:00 PM »
For $3,000 you can also get Chloe

Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #77 on: December 13, 2001, 06:54:00 PM »
I heard about that as well. I'm sorry if it is true. I'm no prude or anything (obviously not, I am here) but **31** seems much worse to me somehow compared to doing hardcore videos. I can't really explain why I feel that way....aside from the legality of it I suppose there technically may be no great difference since she is being paid to perform sexually in either case, but it just seems that way to me. I don't know, everyone draws lines on what sort of things are acceptable and what aren't, and the escort service thing crosses one with me I guess.

*

Chili_Palmer

  • D Cup
  • 153
    • www.hooters.dk >>>Chili
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #78 on: December 13, 2001, 08:28:00 PM »
Hate to break the news to ya, Dave, but the Maxi Mounds' and the Wendy Whoppers' (ladies who absolutely do NOT escort) are the exceptions in this world, not the rule.

Quite honestly, it's nice to see Linsey and Chloe now available on an intimate basis for their fans, albeit at an exhorbitant price. That's been the one downside to the Internet explosion: what used to be a reasonable $200-$400 fee (1997 and before) for a high quality porn star now runs upwards of $1200-$4,000--more than they make at a normal shooting for a lot less effort. To paraphrase PT Barnum, "There's a sucker with a hardon logging on every minute."

CP

Chili Palmer
Webmaster/Host, A Cup of Chili: Ultra
http://www.hooters.dk >>>Chili
Chili's Free Story Annex located @
http://www3.bearchive.com/~chilipalmer99/index.htm

Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #79 on: December 13, 2001, 08:46:00 PM »
I didn't just fall off the back of a turnip truck, Chili. I know it is a common practice.
I was just throwing out my two cents that's all.

*

richardosteele

  • C Cup
  • 77
    • none
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #80 on: December 13, 2001, 09:03:00 PM »
For those of you who might consider spending $3,000 for quality time with LDM (or are just curious and would like to check out a client's reaction), you can find a review of the buxom British beauty at www.theeroticreview.com.   Go to the London provider reviews and you will find it. She was very highly rated, by the way; if I recall, she got the "once in a lifetime" score. And why not?

Reviews for Chloe Vevrier can be found at wwww.bigdoggie.net by doing a search in the data banks for such cities as Washington, D.C., New York, and Dallas (I think). She also gets rave reviews. Of course, for that kind of money, one would expect a high level of satisfaction from both of them.  

I might add that user reviews on various sites appear to indicate that Chelsea Charms herself is available for fun and games for $1,000.00 a session. For the right sort of guy only, though. Apparently she is wary about it and will entertain only those fellows whose bona fides she accepts and with whom she feels comfortable. Even $1,000 is a lot of money but on the dollar/breast size continuum, Chelsea might be a bargain!

Richard O. Steele

[ December 14, 2001: Message edited by: Richard O. Steele ]


*

Pacman

  • Woka Woka
  • 1289
  • It's my wife. Don't send horny shit to me.
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #81 on: December 14, 2001, 05:46:00 AM »
I'm assuming that the way things operate for these ladies is much different than your average Tom, Dick, and Harry escort service.

Frankly I wish those average services (especially those that don't protect their girls) would be stomped out, folded up and shoved right up the people running it's collective asses.

But that is for some very, very personal reasons.

I can't even smile and be excited about the higher priced places that run a tight ship. I'll never patronize one no matter who it had, or what the price.

But if you were me you wouldn't either.

For art and photos:
http://pacman9920.deviantart.com
I remember blogs before blogs existed:
http://logg64.wordpress.com/

*

SAMU

  • BANNED USER
  • 290
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #82 on: December 14, 2001, 10:01:00 PM »
Having dated a well known porn star for a couple of years in LA and a couple here, I had the oppretunity to see them and ther friends "work the phones" and I'll tell you. They may have a price quoted in the paper and they may quote a certain price over the phone. But they sit around for hours waiting for somone to show up. I'm not going to quote any numbers but if you show up with a reasonable amount of money for a half hour trick, you might be surprised. Business is business, right? Everybody's got to stay busy and make a living.

Good Luck
SAMU


*

F_Cup_Fitzgerald

  • Banned User
  • 3590
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #83 on: December 15, 2001, 08:05:00 AM »
Originally posted by Richard O. Steele, quoting "Chris1606":
quote:
I went to see her dance, introduced myself, then showed her a picture of me and another porn star in bed to prove I wasn't a cop.

Well, that's one way of proving you're not a cop. . . . Sometimes drug dealers will demand that you injest drugs IN FRONT OF THEM to prove that you aren't L.A.P.D. (it's obviously against the regulations to take drugs if you're a cop). But I like Chris1606's method better. Just carry around the photos with you:

"Here's one of me with Letha Weapons . . . and this one is me and Chloe . . . and here's me and Lindsay. . . ."

Much more fun than trying to convince a drug dealer you're not a cop, especially the prep work. And your resume just keeps getting more and more impressive. . . .


Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #84 on: December 16, 2001, 05:43:00 AM »
As far as I was aware, Wendy Whoppers has been escorting for years. There was a whole load of stuff about it ages ago on Lisa Lipps' site, when the two of them fell-out. Maxi Mounds definetly doesn't escort.

I'd be very dubious about Chelsea Charms escorting - she's been going to great lengths to protect her image, and she's one of the highest earners in the biz. I wouldn't imagine she'd need to.

As for the UK-Glamour Girls site. I think it's a bit of a con. They used to have Traci Topps as an escort on that site (images of her with her face blurred out).


*

DTM

  • G Cup
  • 840
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #85 on: December 17, 2001, 03:04:00 AM »
I notice a few of you seem shocked or disapointed that these girls might have or do escort. It's a fact of life boys and girls. Things like this happen all the time. I only have one problen with it. I can't afford any of them.    Seriously I guess there's lots of reasons some do it. A couple would be magazines and modeling don't pay much. If a girl shoots for her own site that costs money. Even the most popular web sites don't bring in that much money. Any extra features like a chat and web cam cost even more. All the way back to the software and equipment. That has been mentioned in many other threads. I strongly suspect every model has considered or tried escorting. Some can get into it and some don't. Certainly there is enough horny guys out there offering the bucks to these ladies. Sometimes it must be hard to refuse. Another thing is what makes you think some of these girls haven't been doing it all along ? Before they got to be so well known..  
She should make one of them stolen home videos.

*

southy

  • G Cup
  • 1171
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #86 on: December 17, 2001, 09:14:00 AM »
I don't give a shit about the morality of it,i'm just thinking $3000 for a night with Chloe,start saving.

*

F_Cup_Fitzgerald

  • Banned User
  • 3590
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #87 on: December 18, 2001, 01:43:00 AM »
Even I had the $3000 to blow (har-har), I think I'd pass. Beauty is no guarantee of good technique. I wouldn't want to pay all that cash for a date that goes through the motions looking perfunctory and bored.  Problem with being pretty (and this goes all the way back to high school cheerleaders) is that some girls who ARE pretty think that they're such hot shit that all they've ever learned how to do is BE pretty. Supposedly Letha Weapons had a whole list of things you couldn't do to/with her, in case, for instance, you might mess up her hair. . . .

*

DTM

  • G Cup
  • 840
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #88 on: December 23, 2001, 02:07:00 PM »
http://www.pornhoolio.com/gallery/gallery4.html

Change the gallery number and get the rest. Ends at 11 I think. There's some others in there too. So if your still lookin' for some Linsey get them before there taken down !  

Merry Christmas !

She should make one of them stolen home videos.

*

DTM

  • G Cup
  • 840
Re: Linsey Dawn McKenzie MERGED
« Reply #89 on: December 26, 2001, 11:07:00 AM »
The link is still up and working guys. Doesn't anybody want them? Or does everyone already got them ?
She should make one of them stolen home videos.