Pal replies: I'm new to Linux in general and only used Ubuntu 9.x for a short while before 10 came out and switching to it, so I can't speak to how much of an improvement was made when 10 was released from a functionality standpoint. However, from a GUI standpoint, 10 looks as modern as OSX, and cleaner than either Vista or Seven, whereas Ubuntu 9.x felt more like Mac OS9 or Windows 95/98 from an interface standpoint. Having run OSX, Vista and Ubuntu lately, I'm liking the Ubuntu 10.x GUI most of all, even though I'm still a Mac guy at heart (26 years is a long time and you get used to a thing).
As it happens, I *did* try to Hackintosh the Dell on which I'm now running Ubuntu, installing and troubleshooting 3 different Hackintosh kernels with help from Chev, but none ran properly/with any stability, thus negating the whole point of OSX IMO, so that prompted me to try Ubuntu (since Vista eventually turned out to be awful IMO). As I'm now a Linux fan, it all worked out for the best (of course, I don't play any games at all and fairly basic/free graphics software satisfies my needs).
Yeah, my Hackintosh attempts resulted in a computer that would crash whenever you ran anything that used 3D effects, even the Chess program. It wasn't stable enough to consider. One of the things I like about Linux is that there are so many different versions, some have a lot of eye candy, some are bare-bones, others are somewhere in-between, and they can use the same programs.
I asked about the EyeTV because I'm always curious about what systems folks use for video capture... when I was shopping for one a couple years ago, the 250 was what I was zeroing in on IIRC. You needn't post about it solely on my account... I was just wondering if you already had so I could learn of your impressions re: its usability (as a Tivo replacement), the image quality of the caps/clips, what limits you might have encountered in terms of resolution/frame rate due to CPU/bus bandwidth, etc... Just part of my natural nosiness I guess. 
Let's see... It's a small USB2 device that has three connectors: cable TV, composite, and s-video. I've used it on my current computer (Early 2009 Mac mini), and my previous one (2002 G4/dual 1ghz). I haven't upgraded to the newest software (which I would need to do if I wanted to upgrade the mini to Snow Leopard), I have 2.5.3, which is a version or two behind.
The software is a little slow to start on both computers (takes about the same time as Photoshop CS1), and it always opens a window of the currently selected video source. It -had- an online cable-box-like program guide, but it used "TitanTV", and was only free for about a year or two. It can still record, but you have to set in the times like with a VCR (but you can set schedules to repeat, name them, etc). There are a number of different window size options, there have been times where my computer wasn't in view of any television and I've used it to display a small window of whatever I wanted to watch while I worked. Most often though I've used it to convert old VHS tapes to DVDs.
The picture quality isn't perfect, especially when watching though the cable TV there are some lines in the video. It's possible it's more sensitive than a TV or VCR, or that it's some issue with the cable wire or connection. Some tweaking might solve it. Currently, the picture is better though the (composite) connection to the VCR than directly using the cable feed. I don't have any kind of HD source (if it allows HD), both computers could handle full resolution SD video at normal (30 fps?) frame rates. The software has several options for how big you might want the MPEG files. When recording I do sometimes notice a little lag with the computer in general, but I've never sat and tried to figure out how much of that is processor related, and how much is hard drive related.
It comes with a remote control, it can do picture in picture, it can export to many kinds of files, the newer version can edit files, it has an optional full-screen menu. When TitanTV was active it could name the files after the episode recorded, and also give it a summary.
It's not perfect, but I like it. It's better than the Windows-based ATI wonder-something-rather I've used before. The video looks better, and the software makes more sense. I have sometimes had issues with it stopping a several-hour recording, there might be a file size limit for a single file.
Pal replies: THANKS for the info Lightfoot, I appreciate it! 