I know what you're saying - but, I always compare these things with what I know. For example, September Carino is supposed to be a 28F and Brandy Robbins is a 30G. My wife is a 32FF, and my wife looks much smaller than both of them, despite having a bigger back size and a comprable cup size.
Me too. My wife is a 38F (right now, most days she's 38DD) and I think she looks bigger then the woman above. That's her in my avatar wearing a padded pushup VS 38DD bra. But even in a normal, lightly lined bra, I think she has at least as much as her or more.
The sizes given by big tit models is more likely to be exagerated or modified than the girls in a competition for a bra company - the competition models would get found out come makeover time when they had to model the bras. Also, there's often a difference between sizing in the UK and USA (or Europe), which can cause confusion.
Normally I'd agree with you, especially when talking about XXX pornstars with huge implants, but I'd like to think the soft porn pinups on pinupglam like sites are as advertised - or should be. To me, that's part of the appeal when dealing with naturals. I also though UK sizes ran a little bigger once past DD. Like their E is like our F. Either way, she's plus or minus one cup from an American bra, H or J. H still seems too big.
I work with a girl who is a 38KK, and she looks smaller than Traci Topps was - and Traci was a 34JJ (although, Miss 38KKs tits are pretty massive).
Not that I'm doubting you, but how do you
know she's a 38KK? Have you actually seen her bras? Watched her try them on? I would think natural boobs that big (if she is natural, I know you didn't say either way) should "look" bigger then augmented ones ones of the same size, so it seems shocking to me that a 38KK looks smaller then a 34JJ.