[Maski]

I am always on the lookout for busty women and I get a thrill from capturing them on "film".  It gets my heart pumping maneuvering for the right shot.  Since I am frequently doing this I thought perhaps I should consolidate my candids into one thread...  I'll start with some that have never been posted and then ask the mods if it's OK to repost candids that I have posted previously.

This first shot is a busty receptionist at a doctor's office!  Deliciously slim and stacked!  And cute!  Interesting thing is that ALL of the women in this doctor's office (the doc is the only male in the office) are large breasted...I should have been a doctor...

copyright (c) Maski

[Jubei]

That first girl is pretty amazing looking even without the tig bitties!

[Rad]

No wonder you have so many great shots, Phoenix, land of silicone and sun. LOL

[chorizo]

Really enjoy your taste Maski! Something about a nice pair of big firm one's in a tight shirt out n about in public really gets the heartbeat up. Good post.

[onion_writer]

I get a thrill from capturing them on "film".  It gets my heart pumping maneuvering for the right shot.

It is perhaps my own shortcoming that this creeps me out. A beach image every now and then is fine, and I appreciated your Costco pix. But that you have made a hobby of this -- I am just alarmed.

These women did not seek perpetual internet fame merely by shopping or going to work. In fact, since some of these women are indeed at work, they cannot escape your perhaps-unwelcome attention. What if I came to your job and took photos of yourself, without permission, and posted them?

Looking at your images makes me feel unclean. I wouldn't be here if I didn't delight in looking at large breasts, but I see no respect for these women here. They were ambushed -- attacked.

Mod edit: your User Agreement explicitly states "Do not discuss the legal ramifications of any BEArchive policy, activity, or action." so I'll ask you to refrain from posts like the bit I've edited out here. Maski (and Mercerwatch and JeffSmit9 and other users) are all posting WITHIN the site rules and they're entitled to continue doing so without implied fearmongering from armchair attorneys. You've expressed your dislike for these kind of photos... fine. You've made your point, so now let others participate as the BEA Owner's rules allow. Thanks. -Palomine, Aug 24, 2010

To take it to its extreme, otherwise we'd have paparazzi photos of Lindsay Lohan buying tampons, Matt Damon buying condoms, etc.

Again, this is perhaps my problem and no one else's.

[Pacman]

This thread is going to get interesting really quickly.

1 vote for creepy here.

[Mercerwatch]

1 vote here for you shouldve thought of that before you clicked on the subject line AND
1 vote here for I'm here for objective pictures & descriptions of large breasts not discussions on semantics.
If only candid photography was as popular a pastime as being judgemental. 

[Maski]

Ok. Well I guess that's the end of this thread.

[MrsPacman1]

I get a thrill from capturing them on "film".  It gets my heart pumping maneuvering for the right shot.
 A beach image every now and then is fine, and I appreciated your Costco pix.

OR - I really appreciate that you are calling this out. Even though you liked the Costco pix where his language was extremely offensive. Read it again...maybe you'll see it with a whole new set of eyes after this thread.

Okay, moving on. The majority of the time, I'm highly offended by candid pictures. If the woman knows she is being photographed, it becomes an entirely different scenario. Why? Well, I am a woman. I know what it feels like to have this happen to them. In my mind, it's no better than being a peeping tom. If those women knew it was happening, and where it was being displayed (like some sort of animal hide after a hunt) not only would they feel violated, but they would be promptly removed no doubt.
Models...nude models even do that.

One day, someone is going to click a candid photo thread and see his girlfriend, wife or even worse...his daughter posted with several men singing praises about certain body ports. That's if that hasn't happened yet.

Regardless, if it's legal or not...I can accept that there will be people who do this, and continue to post the photos. If this were my forum, I would ask that those who do have the decency to blur the faces of the women in the pics. Come on, guys. These women have lives and have the right to their privacy. We all know where Maski lives, it wouldn't be a stretch for some delusional psycho to find out which Dr.'s office these women work at. Then what? Can you all say with absolute confidence that it couldn't happen?

In Maski's case, I think he definitely has some issues.

Mrs*another vote for creepiness*Pacman

[Maski]

I am obsessed with women with large breasts and I spend time taking pictures of them. I also morph pictures of women and make their breasts larger for my own enjoyment. I do have issues...
Somehow I thought this was OK as long as I wasn't hurting anyone. But I understand your concerns.    If you are a receptionist is the workplace less of a public place than the beach? Is taking Candid shots at a beach also an invasion? Is the grocery store a public place?  I honestly don't know where to draw the line except for a person's home.

In short, I would never try and take a picture of a person in their home through a window. But thought out in public was ok.

Mod edit: just for the record, as long as they're OK per the BEA Owner's rules, public candids ARE ALLOWED HERE. Folks are entitled to voice their opinions about such images (both pro and con) and of course, it's the uploader's option to blur or not blur the faces as they choose... they're certainly under no obligation to do so. For every user who finds such pix 'creepy' there are a hundred who enjoy and appreciate them... which simply proves the adage that you can't please all of the people all of the time. Again: as long as the pix/post contains no real-world location/identification, and the pix are taken in public (not spy or upskirt) where there's no particular expectation of privacy, and there are no kidz visible, etc... THEN THEY ARE 100% ALLOWED HERE. Just clarifying, as this sort of debate comes up once a year or so. Thanks. -Palomine

[Pacman]

I just want to state for the record that while I don't agree with some things in this thread, I have absolutely no problem with you ladies following me around the grocery store candidly taking pictures of the buldge in my pants. You are also welcome to post them online and have discussions about how awesome it is.

Though I'm not sure Mrs. Pac would be real pleased with you....

[Q_BE]

1 vote for continuing this thread…as long as they are allowable, I don't see why not. I myself have desired on many occasions to have had a camera to capture the buxom beauties I encounter at various times and in diverse places, and post them here with the intent of strictly obeying the rules on posting pics.

I can understand the creepiness factor; I myself was videotaped without my permission once…far be it from me to go into details here, but I feel that my situation was far different from Maski's personal desire, and so I see no problem with taking unobtrusive pictures of beautiful ladies as though I were taking pictures of a gorgeous sunset. That last comment may be an oversimplification, but as long as the ladies aren't disturbed…

Q-"Maybe it's like capturing wildlife?"-BE

Mod edit: nothing at all to do with Q's post above, but I'm locking this one thread for one day, to let this hullabaloo calm down (we'll leave similar threads open for now). Again: everyone's entitled to express their opinions... if you don't like candids, fine. However, they ARE allowed here under specific conditions (outlined in the Owner's rules) and that's that. It is NOT alright to initiate legal debates here about this BEA policy (or any other for that matter)... that IS against the rules.