[salem]

Oh god, that typo is painful. *cringe*

Welcome to the world of the British tabloids!

[salem]

 

[salem]

 

[salem]

Whether people think her boobs are big or not, she is very attractive. Definite girlfriend/wife material!

[phonehome1]

Yes fine GF/wife material but just quit lying to us and trying to tell us that she is any more than a D cup. Sarena Lee is/was a H cup so was LDM as a I recall, so that is one natural and one with implants, you are trying to tell me that this woman is even remotely close to that size? Christy Canyon and Keisha Dominquez at the same age were DD's this woman is certainly not bigger than them, if anything she is SMALLER and no I do NOT want to here this crap about how all those women and the dozens more I could list are all wearing the "wrong size bra" Secondly 28" do you realize just how small that is? Tami Monroe, Wendy Whoppers, Kiki Daire and plenty of others that are 5' plus or minus a few inches, none of them are that small, most are more than 30 inches.     

[salem]

She is more than a D, that's certain. All due to her slight frame. 28FF is a very narrow band size (effectively a 28G, which makes it the equivalent, in terms of size as a 30F, 32E and 34D)

Besides, saying she is 'no-more than a D cup' makes no sense. A D cup can be bigger than an F cup depending on what the band size is.

[phonehome1]

Salem

So do you know any of the rest of her stats?

Height, weight? her other two numbers?

I would be surprised if she is much over 5', to have 28" band size and be 5'7" she would have to be ultra shinny, anorexic skinny and women like that are lucky to be a B-cup so unless those are implants ----- and you can see it in the face and arms of someone that skinny as well and you do not see it with her.   

A 28 inch band size is small REALLY small, other than maybe some kind of "little person" I have never heard of a 26 and for some odd reason the only 28's seem to be in the UK and considering the US is almost 7 times the population you would think we would have at least one but yet I know on none.

So what's up with that?

I fully realize how band size and cups size "works", that is you compare a 48DD to a 30DD the 30DD looks bigger a lot bigger but the comparison I made are not like that. I am talking about differences of 6 may 8 inches not 18 Sarena Lee is 5'2 I don't know her weight but no one would say she is anywhere close to "fat" and she is a 34H and if you compare like views this woman is no where close to as big it is a stretch I will not make to say they look the same size  and the above example says as a 28H she should look BIGGER not smaller. 

Assuming she is really that tiny/petite the best comparison would be Tami Monroe or a few porn stars,  a pre implants  Wendy Whoppers for example at or under 5' and less that 100 LBS but none of them had a band size of under 30" Now my experienced eye says this woman does not look any bigger than  a 34DD Tami Monroe was/is if as big and again following the above example even if she were "only" a 28DD much less an H she should look bigger and by more than a little than Tami Monroe and I am sorry but she just does not

[Escher]

Just some clarification on bra sizing (I used to be a bra designer).

As the band size decreases (or increases), the cup size increases (or decreases) for the same volume .

These bras in the UK for example, all have the same volume (ie same physical size of boob)  28FF, 30F, 32E, 34DD, 36D, 38C.

Bra/breast volume is a function of both cup and band size, hence a DD cup on a 28 band are bee stings, a DD cup on a 48 band is bigger than your head.

In her case, she has average size breasts but a very small frame, so looks a bit busty and probably is about a 28FF (if the '28' part is true).

<edit> pretty much all of the above has already been mentioned, sorry 

[phonehome1]

Well not withstanding your "bra designer" street cred when you came out with that statement that 28DD = "bee stings" you lost it with me.

I could name any number of women, models porn stars or other "**28**" that we would both know that are either 30DD's or 32DD's both implanted and natural (or so they say)  plus having had some "hands on experience" with both sizes and both types over the years and they were handfuls, BIG handfuls,bury your face in them handfuls and no one in their right mind would characterize them as "bee stings" and while their might have been a SLIGHT difference in apparent size between the 32DD and the 2 inch smaller 30DD and to me the 30DD more often than not looked bigger, at least a little but even if they did look a little smaller the difference was not that much so the idea that dropping 2 inches from 30DD which were pretty good sized handfuls down to a 28DD and all the sudden you get "bee stings"  sorry but I am not going to buy that. 

In case you have not figured it out when I say what I say I am employing the "eye test" and "how they look" and it is more the volume of what is in that bra and how it looks compared to a like volume, it may be that the actual volume of breast tissue  on a 48DD woman is more maybe twice that of what is on a 30DD but the woman with the 30DD's looks bigger, more often than not a LOT bigger.

It may be that if you strictly apply the number to this BS UK sizing system you get what you get but I contend that the UK system was "invented" back 10 or so years ago because before then I had never heard of it and that first generation of UK and EU women, LDM, Lorna Morgan, Chloe V and a few others were not measured by it.  So now all these somewhat busty women can "sound bigger" "look at me I am a H cup" in some cases a LOT bigger than they really are or what most of us think of, DD's are Christy Canyon, FF's are an early Lorna Morgan or Chloe V H's are Sarena Lee, HH' LDM  and so on, and this "sounding bigger was the entire reason it was "invented" it was NOT as some contend about "accuracy"

[Escher]

Man, I think you need to lay off the coffee and learn what the word 'punctuation' means.

I'm sorry you disagree with how bra sizing has been standardised in the clothing industry for the last 80 years (the same way, all around the world, even the 'BS UK system').  There isn't a lot I can do about it, sorry.  You are aware that the UK and US bra systems are almost identical ?

I was trying to make the point regarding size, saying someone is a 'DD cup' is meaningless unless you know the band size as well.  A 28DD bra uses a size 34 underwire (approx 5" diameter).  A 48DD bra uses a size 54 underwire, which is just under 10" diameter. A 48DD cup volume is 8 times larger than a 28DD, yet both are 'DD' which you seem to think means they are the same size ?  

Here is an auction for an actual 28DD bra. Feel free to go and get them 'handfuls, BIG handfuls,bury your face in them handfuls'

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Womens-Freya-Underwired-Bra-Size-28dd-Brand-New-/371287616603?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item5672776c5b

I'll just have to stick with my measly 48DD instead

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Size-48dd-Trifolium-Bra-NWT-Nude-No-Padding-Total-Support-No-Wires-Bra-/161645942565?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item25a2d95725

[salem]

Salem

So do you know any of the rest of her stats?

Height, weight? her other two numbers?

I would be surprised if she is much over 5', to have 28" band size and be 5'7" she would have to be ultra shinny, anorexic skinny and women like that are lucky to be a B-cup so unless those are implants ----- and you can see it in the face and arms of someone that skinny as well and you do not see it with her.   

A 28 inch band size is small REALLY small, other than maybe some kind of "little person" I have never heard of a 26 and for some odd reason the only 28's seem to be in the UK and considering the US is almost 7 times the population you would think we would have at least one but yet I know on none.

So what's up with that?

I fully realize how band size and cups size "works", that is you compare a 48DD to a 30DD the 30DD looks bigger a lot bigger but the comparison I made are not like that. I am talking about differences of 6 may 8 inches not 18 Sarena Lee is 5'2 I don't know her weight but no one would say she is anywhere close to "fat" and she is a 34H and if you compare like views this woman is no where close to as big it is a stretch I will not make to say they look the same size  and the above example says as a 28H she should look BIGGER not smaller. 

Assuming she is really that tiny/petite the best comparison would be Tami Monroe or a few porn stars,  a pre implants  Wendy Whoppers for example at or under 5' and less that 100 LBS but none of them had a band size of under 30" Now my experienced eye says this woman does not look any bigger than  a 34DD Tami Monroe was/is if as big and again following the above example even if she were "only" a 28DD much less an H she should look bigger and by more than a little than Tami Monroe and I am sorry but she just does not

She is 5 ft 2. The Page 3 Model Tara O'Connor was a 30F and she was 5 ft 9, so height and band size do not always go hand in hand anyway.

And as I said, a 28FF is about the equivalent in size terms of a 34D. So by that comparison you would be correct, the fact is that the bigger the cup size does not always mean bigger breasts. The band size is a key factor.

[salem]

 

Laura Hamilton, as a pregnant lady!

[salem]

 

[salem]

 

[salem]