[suzieq_]

I think you're referring to this one?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l11zscqh2AE&list=UUrtwKpwVa8eDf96Vx047yYQ

Ya, she's amazing - and real, too

I think she's from Montreal, too

[phonehome1]

Glottis

As long as the PS involved is going for "the natural look" from the outset, does not try to turn an A cup into a DD/DDD cup, does not try to stuf in the biggest possible implant regardless of what size she is to begin with be it A or D does not use super overfilled implants and idealy the woman is already a C or D then while they are large they can look LDM stlye "natural" and have a very "mistable" bounce.

Ther are other examples but the best two that come to mind are Mellissa Mounds and Tiffany Towers both especially after they had been in a while looked very "soft &squishy" and bounced around quite "mistakably"

I know you all want to beleive that a whole new subspecies of female human evolved about 20 yeara ago where every other woman is a G cup and a D is a "training bra" but current stats say otherwise in the US still C is average unless obesity is involved and even in the UK and EU it is only a cup size or so larger for some reason but it not "every woman is huge" like you would try to make us beleive and a sizable % of your "naturally busty brits" are there because they are packing on the pounds, that "dream of Ashley" girl is at 18 already on the edge if not already obese enough that in most shots her tummy is covered or she is posed in such a way that it is "de-emphasized' and I shudder to think about how she is going to blow up in the next 10 years. Think Samtha 38G or September Carino       

[Glottis]

phonehome,

a) stats on bra sizes are completely worthless for a number of reasons, and using them as any basis for your assessment is a bad idea
b) even if the average size was a "c cup", that doesn't mean that there aren't millions of women above that size. You understand that the population of the world who actively uses social media to post photos is enormous, right? Should we be posting all the pictures of people who aren't busty in an effort to convince you that these people are unique?
c) go outside and actually look at people, then you'll see
d) your judgement on breast size only increasing because of weight gain is just plain wrong
e) Tiffany Towers' breasts were somewhat squishy but didn't look natural.

From reading your post, it seems like you've made up your mind, despite all the evidence around you, so I'm not really sure why you'd choose to even participate here.

[suzieq_]

I would say don't bother - if he doesn't want to believe, fine, it's his loss, the rest of us are no worse off for it (and in fact are better off believing that such lovely creatures can indeed be found in nature ).

[DJPFC]

I would say don't bother - if he doesn't want to believe, fine, it's his loss, the rest of us are no worse off for it (and in fact are better off believing that such lovely creatures can indeed be found in nature ).

Yeah, he's the same guy who thinks Kelly Madison has had several augmentations over the years and used a combination of dermabrasion and special digital effects to erase all her scars, so don't bother wasting your time.  For him, every woman who has big boobs has either gotten them because of weight gain or implants... hormones and natural growth don't exist.

This is all you can say to someone like that.

[suzieq_]

Here's another pic of this luscious gal....she is sooo lovely

[phonehome1]

DJ--

You are the one who does not seem to get the point.

When it comes to implants being the cause of big breasts on a woman be it this woman Kelly Madison Wifey, Ju;ia Miles or anyone who resembles her and there are more than few . I allow for the possibility of them being the reason/source where as people like you insist that it is just absolutly impossible, no way no how just "because she says so" or maybe because of pics or vids you have seen and even in cases where the woman in question has not said one way o0r the other you just decide "she's all natural"  based on pics clothed pics in this case or maybe video.

As far as I know she has not said one way  or the other.

Do you know for a fact that she has?

Which would just bring us back to "because she says so"

From the start all you had to do was say "I think it not likley but yes they could be" rather than INSIST that it is just "impossible"   

[st22]

Real/fake post pics of GTFO.

[DJPFC]

DJ--

You are the one who does not seem to get the point.

When it comes to implants being the cause of big breasts on a woman be it this woman Kelly Madison Wifey, Ju;ia Miles or anyone who resembles her and there are more than few . I allow for the possibility of them being the reason/source where as people like you insist that it is just absolutly impossible, no way no how just "because she says so" or maybe because of pics or vids you have seen and even in cases where the woman in question has not said one way o0r the other you just decide "she's all natural"  based on pics clothed pics in this case or maybe video.

As far as I know she has not said one way  or the other.

Do you know for a fact that she has?

Which would just bring us back to "because she says so"

From the start all you had to do was say "I think it not likley but yes they could be" rather than INSIST that it is just "impossible"   

Sorry, but you lost any and all credibility when you insisted that KM was using a combination of otherworldly plastic surgery that can make fake breasts look and move entirely like real ones, as well as dermabrasion and digital video effects to erase scars as part of an elaborate hoax to fool people into thinking her breasts are natural.  

The most entertaining part of all that is that you are genuinely convinced that you are correct.   It's actually pretty impressive in that regard, I have to hand it to you.

[zeo]

I know you all want to beleive that a whole new subspecies of female human evolved about 20 yeara ago where every other woman is a G cup and a D is a "training bra"

1) Breast sizes like anything else should follow a normal distribution. We use this tool called the internet to see photos and videos of far more outliers than we would ever have the privilege of seeing in person. We see outliers here on this website, not a representative sample.

2) Various alterations to the food supply, new container materials, etc and so forth result in substances that mimic female hormones and that has been blamed for a number of things including larger breasts.

Late teens girl at the big box home improvement store that rang up my purchase today had boobs that would be 99th percentile (proportionally to the rest of her) in my HS class (about the size of this Karen T, maybe a bit bigger, the apron required relying on the side view). Also this wasn't in the sort of neighborhood that has the wealth to hand out boob jobs for 16th birthdays. The dials have been turned up, but I'll leave others to have conjecture why.

But even without a shift in size, this site exists to show the 3 or more standard deviations from the mean women. The sampling here is biased and deliberate.

[suzieq_]

Let him wallow in his disbelief; in the meantime, the rest of us can enjoy her

[Sawyer90]

The most entertaining part of all that is that you are genuinely convinced that you are correct.   It's actually pretty impressive in that regard, I have to hand it to you.

I offer my signature for your consideration on this point, gentlemen.

[phonehome1]

DJ---

You want to talk about "credibilty" fine by me.

For the record and you can go back and check despite your assertion I NEVER once "insisted" that KM had breast implants. What I said from the start is that I "had doubts" and I explained why, I gave examples of other women "in the industry" who have made simular claims and had people doubt those claims and one who was eventually found to be "lieing about" and I layed out a scenario where she could POSSIBLY have them and look the way she does and did and used as evidence of it being plausible my very up close and personal experience with about give or take 20 women, from CA to FL over about a 15 year period who were "simular"

You are the one more than any who has from the start just absolutly INSISTED that is is just not possible because you of what you have seen some "hi-res video" and maybe gotten the "she says so" in person" or close to it as part of  "she works with us" what ever that means and said that anyone who does not blindy believe "just does not know anything about boobs".

Well I will submit to you that the guys at Score know more about boobs, big boobs that pretty much anyone on the planet certainly more than me and probably more than you yet they got taken in by Julia Miles and who knows how many others who were not on the scene for long and/or had no vids in the past that said otherwise or did not eventually "admit to it".

I do not know what the chances are 10% or 1% but I know that they are not 0% and until you can tell me that you have touched them and I mean really "looking to feel implants" type of touching and got up close and personal and looked and I really looked for the scars that you insist are not there or seen the results of a mamagram or some simular test that you with your own eyes witnessed her taking you do not either.       

[jay_robert]

She looks great

[phonehome1]

CONT--

The ONLY thing that I "insist on" and am "convinced of" is that it is not "impossible" but for the life of me I do not understand why you are so seemingly "invested" in the idea that it is.

Pin up Files has models with implants very obvious such as Candy Charms and others not so much would it be the greatest tradgey in the world that if somehow some way it came out that she has been fooling us all along" said it origianlly way back when, but did not really know/think anyone would believe her but then when they did just went with it and soon felt like Julia Miles may have, felt she had to "stick with the story"