[Captain Nemo]

Thanks for your analyses, guys. I suspected AI because it was too good to be true that such a sexbomb existed without being cited all over the place. OTOH the images were not unbelievably flawless, e.g. with skin tone, which Is a common clue in AI. The fingers used to be the main telltale, but Al has apparently solved that. It's ironic that the flaws you found could easily have been repaired with standard morphing techniques. 
Here's another gorgeous image for your attention.

[Captain Nemo]

No analyses/comments on that beach pic?  How about this one? Any giveaways that either of these is AI enhanced?
Also, do you like the babe?

[Bombayduk]

Two thumbs up, a delightful depiction of the minimum every girl should want.

[Captain Nemo]

I digress to post a picture which should be of general interest. It's not likely that it's computer-enhanced.

[Bombayduk]

I have got to find that bar; perhaps Sol already has which would explain his absence.

[Captain Nemo]

Here's a new blockbuster. Beautifully done, just suspend your disbelief and enjoy 

[Captain Nemo]

Cheer for her, she tries hard 

[BElover]

Can we please contain the blatantly AI accounts to the AI thread?

[Captain Nemo]

I think it's time to reconsider loosening the restrictions on AI posts here. AI is no longer a rare phenomenon, it crops up all over the place. And on-topic (i.e.big breast) images from Instagram are almost inevitably AI enhanced, which means that this thread will mostly see AI posts anyway. Why not accept them whether blatant or not? Also I for one don't find it too easy to identify AI enhanced images: it's no longer possible to simply count the fingers.
So can we just accept all AI posts here, blatant or subtle, morphed or unmorphed?

[bignatslover]

So can we just accept all AI posts here

This is a good question that speaks to the era we're in.
But I must say this particular thread (Instagram More like Insta-dayuuuuuummm!) was always a fun way to discover new, human models.
Seeing AI art everywhere, the old me understands why people just call it "AI Slop" because it confounds things when we're looking for real photographs.
I think it's especially frustrating when people pass off an AI image as an actual photograph of a real person.
But I also wonder if trying to protest it is as futile as trying to put out the sun with a water pistol.
I don't have the perfect answer, but if you're accepting opinions, I don't want threads focused on new models to be polluted with AI, more than the inevitable few that slip through.

[MaxBigfoot]

I don't want AI in this thread either, I enjoy seeing new (supposedly) real girls.  Unfortunately, it looks like the "AI posts only in AI threads" rule got thrown under the bus, and I don't know if it's possible or fair to enforce it now.   

[Superion]

Leonor from @adilachour59

[BElover]

I think it's time to reconsider loosening the restrictions on AI posts here. AI is no longer a rare phenomenon, it crops up all over the place. And on-topic (i.e.big breast) images from Instagram are almost inevitably AI enhanced, which means that this thread will mostly see AI posts anyway. Why not accept them whether blatant or not? Also I for one don't find it too easy to identify AI enhanced images: it's no longer possible to simply count the fingers.
So can we just accept all AI posts here, blatant or subtle, morphed or unmorphed?

I think there's a big difference from "AI enhanced' or even face-swapped model - a real person with digital retpucjing - to 100% AI generated character, a complete fiction.

[BElover]

 

[Superion]

Maria B
@harleybenzzz