[Shadowmuse Blown]

As of now, this is a morph, BUT I'm starting to believe it will be reality in the not-too-distant future. 

There doesn’t appear to be any size difference between your morph and the pic of Foxy in the previous post.

[Bombayduk]

As of now, this is a morph, BUT I'm starting to believe it will be reality in the not-too-distant future. 

There doesn’t appear to be any size difference between your morph and the pic of Foxy in the previous post.

I'll stop short of declaring Foxy is fixated on having the biggest boobs in the future, though the comparisons are hard to ignore, because above all, I want her to desperately love the size she creates.  If that means that she will be immensely happy with boobs that weigh 100 pounds while embracing the physical limitations as badges of honor, I totally applaud her following her heart, her dreams.

[solvegas]

As of now, this is a morph, BUT I'm starting to believe it will be reality in the not-too-distant future. 

There doesn’t appear to be any size difference between your morph and the pic of Foxy in the previous post.

But there is. You know that depending on the angle, lens and position of the camera, objects can be distorted. We've seen that in several Beshine photos, Chelsea, Minka and others. Also, at 9250 ccs as of now, in order to be substantially bigger, she would have to add A LOT of saline. There is the old 8 to 1 ratio to think about. In order to double the size in spherical objects, you have to add eight times the volume. The morph I put up is only about 10-20% in size bigger that what she is now but the amount of saline to add is a lot more.   

[Bombayduk]

As of now, this is a morph, BUT I'm starting to believe it will be reality in the not-too-distant future. 

There doesn’t appear to be any size difference between your morph and the pic of Foxy in the previous post.

But there is. You know that depending on the angle, lens and position of the camera, objects can be distorted. We've seen that in several Beshine photos, Chelsea, Minka and others. Also, at 9250 ccs as of now, in order to be substantially bigger, she would have to add A LOT of saline. There is the old 8 to 1 ratio to think about. In order to double the size in spherical objects, you have to add eight times the volume. The morph I put up is only about 10-20% in size bigger that what she is now but the amount of saline to add is a lot more. 

And the size/volume ratio is progressive; the larger the current size, the more volume required to make the same incremental difference. 
While a 9" sphere contains 6250ml, a sphere double the size, 18" will hold 50,000.  Think the implant in the sink video.
Assuming everything is spherical:
Two years ago, Foxy's boobs were 6640cc, just a tad over 9" in diameter.
Foxy's boobs are currently about 10¼" in diameter and contain 9580cc.
When Foxy's boobs reach 11¼" in diameter, just 1" larger, she will be at 16,750.
Small differences, huge differences

[Shadowmuse Blown]

As of now, this is a morph, BUT I'm starting to believe it will be reality in the not-too-distant future. 

There doesn’t appear to be any size difference between your morph and the pic of Foxy in the previous post.

But there is. You know that depending on the angle, lens and position of the camera, objects can be distorted.

Yes, that’s why I said “There doesn’t appear to be any size difference” for that do look like similar sizes.

[lolchair]

As of now, this is a morph, BUT I'm starting to believe it will be reality in the not-too-distant future. 

I'm pretty sure her skin would rip from the weight. And if not, it would leave her immobile and handicapped by the size. Better leave this stuff in fantasy land

[Bramlet]

As of now, this is a morph, BUT I'm starting to believe it will be reality in the not-too-distant future. 

I'm pretty sure her skin would rip from the weight. And if not, it would leave her immobile and handicapped by the size. Better leave this stuff in fantasy land

Yes.  Imho she shouldn't ignore to think about that possibility for in the end a few seconds. No one needs harm, no one needs unnecessary pain. XXXL: love it. Just as we all cannot negate gravity and laws of physics. But, hey: land of the free – but it's your responsibility. No one will force anyone to go bigger and bigger. It may sound harsh but I won't donate for a fund or something like this for anyones recovering from avoidable injuries. Peace.

[Bombayduk]

When I think back, just a couple decades ago, no one was thinking about boobs exceeding maybe 3500cc; they probably all thought they would split wide open by 7000cc, yet here we are.  Who imagined permanent expanding breast implants or even using tissue expanders to create enormous boobs 20 years ago?  Ever watched tissue expanders stretch skin over weeks in burn patients?  Has anyone else taken care of a woman who weighed over 850 pounds?  I have; skin has an amazing ability to stretch and grow over time when uncomplicated by medical conditions like lymphedema.  To reject anything out of hand without considering the plausibility is the antithesis of science and knowledge.  Suggesting that there can be larger boobs tomorrow isn't fantasy, this is not only very possible, it is likely.  To think that the science is done, that there will never be any further advancements in medical prosthesis, breast implants will forever be constructed in the same way with the same substances is archaic thinking brought to you from the same purveyors that are selling the flat earth theory.

In just the past generation, huge advancements have been made in breast implants; it wasn't til the 60s that silicone implants were developed rather than just injecting silicone under the skin, which was much better than the things used before then, like rubber, glass, and foam sponges.  Perhaps, in the future, expanding implants may use semipermeable membranes with a designated expandable filler that uses the body's own serous fluid to expand, much like compacted foam does today, expanding gradually as the skin allows until reaching the selected volume.  The modern day Chelsea but with a cutoff.  There is already a company selling B-lite implants, made with silicone foam advertised to be 30% lighter.  Advancements will continue, it would be comical to suggest that we have reached the pinnacle of enlightenment.

[Miggieknows]

Well said my friend.
I have read about this and in truth yes, boob surgery will and has always been advancing.
There’s a will there’s a way.
In my humble opinion as well,
This will happen and we will witness such mindblowing events for years to come.

[Bombayduk]

Well said my friend.
I have read about this and in truth yes, boob surgery will and has always been advancing.
There’s a will there’s a way.
In my humble opinion as well,
This will happen and we will witness such mindblowing events for years to come.

Well, my friend, owing to the fact that this is elective surgery, I would reframe the statement to 'where there is a demand, this is a way.'  Probably over 99% of the girls seeking implants this year in the USA have no idea expanders exist; they are for a niche market.  But when 75% of the bill goes to the surgeon and only 25% covers the costs of the implants, surgeons have no incentive to suggest expanders despite the knowledge that over half their patients will wish they went larger.  Repeat business.  Clearly, Foxy's surgeon saw past that and perhaps signs her impending boobie greed; good for him, great for Foxy.

I have a definite feeling that if expanders were offered with the same enthusiasm as saline implants, the majority would choose the ones that offer adjustable sizes without additional surgery.  And I would bet many would find themselves slowly drawn into the boobie greed frame of mind, the urge to expand eventually becoming the need to expand.  Oh what a wonderful world it would be.

[Miggieknows]

Indeed!!!
Thank you again for your knowledge and wisdom!!
Appreciate the reads here.

[Neutrowound]

If there was an alternative to saline or silicone for a filler that would significantly reduce the weight of a large implant - it would make all the difference.  The weight becomes too much, impacting breathing and back strength.  If the implants were somehow foam filled or something was used with a lighter specific gravity, projection and larger sizes could be realized.  Of course the material has to be safe if it ruptures.   

[Bombayduk]

If there was an alternative to saline or silicone for a filler that would significantly reduce the weight of a large implant - it would make all the difference.  The weight becomes too much, impacting breathing and back strength.  If the implants were somehow foam filled or something was used with a lighter specific gravity, projection and larger sizes could be realized.  Of course the material has to be safe if it ruptures.   

Like I said above, the silicone foam B-lite implants have been around for about a half dozen years, but in the US, advancement and options go all but ignored or take forever for FDA approval.  Want implants over 800cc, the inexpensive internal bra for large natural breasts, expander implants, light implants, go to Europe because in the US, you may never know these exist, let alone that you have options.  The demand in the US is higher than Europe, however, why offer options that could satisfy in a single surgery when by hiding the options, it may take multiple surgeries.  There is something wrong with this government when they full scale support you cutting off your dick to pretend you are a girl, but refuse to allow a girl to have 1000cc implants to enhance her self image.

[Bramlet]

Finally:

isn't that all some kind of selfishness – for the hope of bigger implants but less weight –  just for satisfaction for the laptop-wankers-community?

[Shadowmuse Blown]

Finally:

isn't that all some kind of selfishness – for the hope of bigger implants but less weight –  just for satisfaction for the laptop-wankers-community?

LOL!  You’re point? 

Seriously, though: no matter what their size, I think all women would rather haul around less weight on their chest.