[Breasts]

She couldn’t get a drain bc of Covid for a long time so she was frustrated.

She was in serious need of one as she nearly burst.

[mango29]

Imagine a scenario where Chelsea did not retire….and also did not drain fluid for a couple of years.

Could she have grown Itsy and Bitsy to this level of massiveness? 😳❤️

She would have been a lot bigger and she would have only gone that long without a drain in retirement so no one would have ever seen it.

[Netzman]

a few thing that comes to mind when looking back at Chelsea's career. For a long time she was the personification of the very large breast fetish that so many of us share. Since then, others have come along that have met or surpassed her in size. I think what may separate her for a long time to come is that she allowed some of us here (among others) to experience the fantasy for real and in person. For a fetish that most average people in the population would not understand, mock, or even shame, being able to be open and have that shared experience was something special for people.

Given the current landscape and how niche having breasts that large are, i don't know if / when someone else will come along that will offer that type of experience.

[Maik]

I think she opened another step of huge breast when she reached her size and so others got the desire to follow her and see that such sizes are possible.
Like in the 90s when Lolo Ferrari first appeared and the whole world world thought she has to big tits.
Compare her with nowadays woman and how many go far beyond Lolos size and have a average day job, like Lilly4K or Redrican.

And nowadays beside Beshine, Foxy and others, we have so much more women who want to have such sizes like Chelsea or beyond.
So it is a steady growing.

But I believe the market to make a living from it is not in relation to the breast size, so if someone want to go bigger and bigger it might be for her own desire in the first place.
I think around 3000cc (or even smaller) there might be the peak for an high rated income.

[Bombayduk]

I think she opened another step of huge breast when she reached her size and so others got the desire to follow her and see that such sizes are possible.
Like in the 90s when Lolo Ferrari first appeared and the whole world world thought she has to big tits.
Compare her with nowadays woman and how many go far beyond Lolos size and have a average day job, like Lilly4K or Redrican.

And nowadays beside Beshine, Foxy and others, we have so much more women who want to have such sizes like Chelsea or beyond.
So it is a steady growing.

But I believe the market to make a living from it is not in relation to the breast size, so if someone want to go bigger and bigger it might be for her own desire in the first place.
I think around 3000cc (or even smaller) there might be the peak for an high rated income.

Definitely agree.  When you look at social media, the girl with 3k often has 10x the number of followers as Beshine or Foxy; evidently the vast majority just find them too big.  I have to imagine those number cross over to pay sites as well.
 
You can even see it here, their threads active, but decreasing in activity as their breasts got larger.

I'm fairly certain girls like Foxy and Beshine are aware of this, yet they wanted to keep making their breasts larger, which leads me to deduce it is for reasons beyond money.  I have long made that argument about Beshine because not only has she said it was never about money, but she was living the rich life before she got implants.  At some point during expansion, they just become infatuated with the look of having enormous breasts.  While we can't take them all seriously, obviously some have been, and I think Mary will go for enormous as she is looking for a company to make Beshine like implants.

I have to think these girls that are intentionally going for enormous sizes, based on the reactions of both Foxy and Beshine, are still rather surprised as they face increasing "huge boobie problems" along the way, but seem to embrace them as signs of how big their breasts have become.  Chelsea wasn't really given the same option of adding or stopping and I never recall her talking about all the problems in an appreciative manner, so I have to conclude she did not embrace her breasts in the same personal manner, but saw them as opportunities.

[Bombayduk]

Until Chelsea, girls never realized that they could live with such huge breasts.  If implants capable of being externally filled in sizes of 10k and over were available, I would bet we would see a number of girls going in that direction and maybe an equal number, having no exhibition desires, unseen

[solvegas]

True but one of the problems with the polypropylene, aka silly string, was how due to its uncontrollably growth pattern, the nipples would not align well which Chelsea didn't like much. Look at her nipples and compare them to Beshine's. Chelsea's are off to the side while Beshine's are forward and look better.

[Bombayduk]

I could be wrong, but I have felt that the rotating nipples are due to a initial medial placement of the implant relative to the nipple, further expansion therefore medial, hence rotation.  With Crystal Storm, there may have been a slight lateral placement, thus rotating slightly inward.  With Beshine, placement, like so many others, was essentially perfect, however, her internal bra holding the right breast slipped out of place a bit, allowing a downward rotation and producing the ridge on the lateral aspect (slipped to that location rather than remaining against the base as intended) while stressing the medial support (always visible).  More argument not to seek under the muscle for really large implants because that point is absolutely going to be medial, which will rotate nipples laterally (see Foxy).  It works for smaller implants, but after that point, go over the muscle and hold the implants in place with internal fixation, IMHO.

[Maik]

Chelsea is not a huge person with 5ft2in she is really dainty and carrying more than 20% of her body weight in jer chest.
So being short and having huge boobs gives some different proportions than being huge with the same rated implants.
I remember the pic of Chelsea and Maxi Mounds standing side by side and even though they might have the same implant volume, Chelsea looking bigger than Maxi.
So for me smaller women with huge implants does it for me  .
Even so smaller women are not in need to go bigger to achieve an really huge round chest.

[lucaxyz2]

What do you guys think is the maximal size ever reached by Chelsea? And is there a picture of her in that size?

[solvegas]

The maximum weight she ever admitted to was 10K or 10,000 ccs and due to her draining of her breasts in a planned manner, it is hard to tell if she ever was bigger than that. The fluctuation of her size was constant. She also claimed to be 5'2" tall, but having met her, I think 5'0" was more likely. You know though, short women have a lot of nice names like petite, doll like, cute, enchanting, and more. Short guys like me though, we are stumps, sawed off, half pints, near dwarfs, and more negative. That's just the way it is. 

[Maik]

I believe even through the regularly draining she has a small growing rate from drain to drain.
Cause her skin looks so full and not flat. So it might be possible that it was each time a bit more stretched and so could hold more and more volume.

[Bombayduk]

Based on her height and just guessing, I would say 12-14k at her largest.  If I remember right, the accumulation of fluid slows as the pocket irritation decreases, and though it is suggested that Chelsea had her breasts drained "regularly," based on picture sequences of any particular time, I would suggest drains were irregular; whenever she felt the need, thus fluctuations every couple years. 

I would also think that as Malik pointed out, the reduced activity level could be weight related, but also indicative of how the weight is distributed.  Without support, as the picture clearly show, her boobs extended will below her navel, which is far more burdensome than if they were carried as they started out, high on her chest, where posture can offset the weight to a large degree.  It would absolutely create more balance challenges, but relieve the stress on the back while reducing the discomfort placed on the diaphragm.

[Bombayduk]

This photo shows one of the disadvantages of the Polypropylene, aka "silly string", implants in which you can see how the nipple in her right breast was pushed out of line to the right since it didn't have a controllable expansion feature like today's modern expansion implants. 

I have hypothesized that lateral nipple rotation may be due to under the muscle insertion as opposed to over; the more medial orientation logically resulting in a outward rotation.  While it works fine for implants of a specific size, the surgeon placing the implants with nipple placement in mind, expecting the nipple to remain facing forward as the breast grows ignores the limited space.  I would suggest that there is an art to it, but the implant has to be positioned to allow for medial expansion, in other words, starting with a cleavage gap that will accommodate the eventual implant size.  So, if you go over the muscle to achieve this gap, implants a bit wider apart, you will also need a bra to hold the weight.

[Maik]

This photo shows one of the disadvantages of the Polypropylene, aka "silly string", implants in which you can see how the nipple in her right breast was pushed out of line to the right since it didn't have a controllable expansion feature like today's modern expansion implants. 

What one sees as disadvantage ,see others as benefit. So when her boobs get too big, she might be still be able to fondle her own nipples  .

But more serious:
I think the moving nipples are not only an effect of the silly string, we see a lot of other models with different placed nipples and even smaller implants.
So I think it is more important where the implants are placed and how much flesh/skin tissue is above them.
Like someone mentioned the balloons, these only have some thin tissue, but if this thickness is uneven, the balloon will expand differently.
And also an important fact might be the individual skin structure, as we know skin stretches very individual from person to person.