*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3406
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #90 on: May 27, 2024, 08:24:42 AM »
imagine, they were bigger than our head  :o
It's hard to put into words how good if felt to have her breasts in my hands.
Sooooo big and soooo firm. Her skin felt so soft to the touch but the slightest squeeze and you could feel the string and fluid feeling rock hard inside her gigantic breasts.
That feeling alone is enough to make you explode and she let me squeeze them super hard whilst she was grinding in my lap. Hell thinking about it if she'd had conventional saline implants they probably would have burst.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83872
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #91 on: May 27, 2024, 08:30:17 AM »
I met Chelsea back in 1999 at Caesars Palace here in Las Vegas at the Exotic Dancer Convention and later on January 2000, I saw her again at the Las Vegas Hilton in a suite, the place is now called The Westlake and originally when Elvis Presley used to have a show there back in the 1970's, The Intercontinental and it was seen on that James Bond movie "Diamonds are forever" with Sean Connery from 1972, and in that suite it was organized by Kayla Kleevege and Minka and we had a private show with all three. There were about 30 of us there and Chelsea was already the biggest since she had more silly string than either Minka and Kayla. I took photos with the camera I had at the time, but Fotomat would not process all of the photos I took since they objected about the "obscene" film. Neither would CVS or anyone else process it.  :(

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3406
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #92 on: May 27, 2024, 08:43:02 AM »
I met Chelsea back in 1999 at Caesars Palace here in Las Vegas at the Exotic Dancer Convention and later on January 2000, I saw her again at the Las Vegas Hilton in a suite, the place is now called The Westlake and originally when Elvis Presley used to have a show there back in the 1970's, The Intercontinental and it was seen on that James Bond movie "Diamonds are forever" with Sean Connery from 1972, and in that suite it was organized by Kayla Kleevege and Minka and we had a private show with all three. There were about 30 of us there and Chelsea was already the biggest since she had more silly string than either Minka and Kayla. I took photos with the camera I had at the time, but Fotomat would not process all of the photos I took since they objected about the "obscene" film. Neither would CVS or anyone else process it.  :(
That's a real shame.

I remember first noticing her in a news report in Score magazine. You're right she was already the biggest by some margin. I had no idea she'd grow so huge or that I'd actually get have PDs with her! Dreams do come true.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #93 on: May 27, 2024, 09:12:02 AM »
Chelsea was both the living proof and inspiration for others that you can have enormous breasts and continue to have a life, albeit, with certain functional alterations.  To be short and have such huge breasts further defies what some may claim, that a girl could not carry such weight, as I'm still under the belief that she exceeded 10k and may have been closer to 14k at times.  That would be 60+lbs on a rather tiny frame.

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3406
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #94 on: May 27, 2024, 09:23:39 AM »
Chelsea was both the living proof and inspiration for others that you can have enormous breasts and continue to have a life, albeit, with certain functional alterations.  To be short and have such huge breasts further defies what some may claim, that a girl could not carry such weight, as I'm still under the belief that she exceeded 10k and may have been closer to 14k at times.  That would be 60+lbs on a rather tiny frame.
She definitely worked out to deal with the load. Her shoulders and lower back felt very muscular.
She said herself that she got to at least 12k in size but due to her unique implants it would have been hard to judge.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3406
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #95 on: May 27, 2024, 09:26:13 AM »
BTW is that gif I posted earlier of Chelsea walking visible to you guys? imgr isn't always reliable.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #96 on: May 27, 2024, 10:15:06 AM »
BTW is that gif I posted earlier of Chelsea walking visible to you guys? imgr isn't always reliable.
Yup, you can detect there is some effort more than normal (as one would expect) in walking.

*

Maik

  • 2928
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #97 on: May 27, 2024, 11:43:20 AM »

...
She said herself that she got to at least 12k in size but due to her unique implants it would have been hard to judge.

Maybe water displacement would be an option, cause most of her breast would be silly string and it would be a great information to know how much volume one of her breast had.
Also an option to calculate the growing rate.
At one point our hands become too small, that is were the BEA starts

Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #98 on: May 27, 2024, 11:52:49 AM »

...
She said herself that she got to at least 12k in size but due to her unique implants it would have been hard to judge.

Maybe water displacement would be an option, cause most of her breast would be silly string and it would be a great information to know how much volume one of her breast had.
Also an option to calculate the growing rate.
Other than a computerized scanned 3D rendering, I would think displacement would be the viable test.  Her implants were 2500cc, so the vast majority was body fluiids. 

In the end, I have to assume Chelsea was just done with the whole huge boob life and just nominalized her approximate size, no longer interested in titles and claims, just wanting to live a more normal life.  Of course, I still wonder; from the pictures I have seen, her reduction still left her with sizable implants, perhaps even the 2500cc she initially wanted.  Anyone else get that impression?

*

osker

  • C Cup
  • 238
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #99 on: May 27, 2024, 12:23:24 PM »
Definitely looks like, from what I've seen, to still be pretty large. Tough to guess a volume though. I also wonder if it's just a step towards a full reduction.... Maybe there was some reason she couldn't have everything removed even if she wanted.

I also think she probably got to the "eff this" phase of her job. We've all been there at some point in our own life. At least at the end of the day I get to go home and leave work behind. Carry those boobs around 24/7 would be a huge toll.

I'm honestly surprised she had them for as long as she did.

*

titorteat

  • A Cup
  • 1349
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #100 on: May 27, 2024, 01:09:31 PM »
If I recall correctly, Chelsea, when she was a guest on the British morning TV, said that she would eventually get a reduction, but would not want to go small. She probably enjoys being very busty, but really got more than she bargained for with the string implants that kept growing. It seems she eventually became tired of having extremely large and heavy implants. I think she has also said that she had cellulitis on her breast, so it may have been an immediate reason for the reduction.
|titor|

*

Maik

  • 2928
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #101 on: May 27, 2024, 03:41:26 PM »
Maybe one point for her decision to get a reduction could be the steady draining. As we see how huge she became in the last days of her active carrier and than maybe have to travel a long distance to get to her doc.
Maybe the long time study for silly string was also cancelled or finished and she did not get any extra cash for her part as guinea pig. Who knows.
At one point our hands become too small, that is were the BEA starts

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3406
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #102 on: May 27, 2024, 05:57:59 PM »
Maybe one point for her decision to get a reduction could be the steady draining. As we see how huge she became in the last days of her active carrier and than maybe have to travel a long distance to get to her doc.
Maybe the long time study for silly string was also cancelled or finished and she did not get any extra cash for her part as guinea pig. Who knows.
She had health related reasons that tipped the scales towards retirement that she spoke of on her OF but I won't elaborate here.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3406
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #103 on: May 27, 2024, 06:00:35 PM »
BTW is that gif I posted earlier of Chelsea walking visible to you guys? imgr isn't always reliable.
Yup, you can detect there is some effort more than normal (as one would expect) in walking.
Glad it worked.

Yes I recall one of the comments when she posted that on insta was "Oh my god you can barely walk. What have you done to yourself?" lol.
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001

*

Breasts

  • P Cup
  • 3406
Re: Chelsea Charms new era
« Reply #104 on: May 27, 2024, 06:05:18 PM »
Also I can't emphasise enough just how heavy her breasts where. Their weight was just stupendous. It took a real effort every time I hefted them. Though it did feel amazing to do so.
Chelsea also mentiioned post reduction that her sternum was actually deformed after 20 years of carrying those massive tits.  :o
01000010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100001