*

Hagis2k

  • E Cup
  • 276
Calley Westwood MERGED
« on: November 01, 2005, 11:38:34 AM »
Hi everybody !

I did do some simple wallpapers for her like 7 monts
she said she going to publish them but she has not
yet so i decided to publish them my self here hope you like ém

here is all i made:

http://**21**/?http://rapidshare.de/files/7055465/calley_wallpapers.zip.html

*

Graham

  • C Cup
  • 96
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2008, 07:52:25 AM »
Anyone know of this big boobed model ?
Just this minute been told about her.....

Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2008, 11:38:38 AM »
Just looked her up. Nice, very nice! She's a lingerie model. She won't do nude. Bummer, but I respect her boundaries.

HER CHICKIPEDIA PROFILE
<font color="yellow">Excuse me m'am, you dropped your boobs.<!--color--></font>

*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2008, 06:29:20 PM »
I'd love to respect her boundaries in a hands-on manner myself
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

G_Wille

  • Banned User
  • 337
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2009, 05:02:32 PM »
There's a bit of nude but the quality isn't great and she looks BETTER after doing the nude.  The saddest part is that recently on line she announced she was getting out of modeling.  HORRIFIC!

*

DJPFC

  • Z Cup
  • 7571
    • http://www.pinupfiles.com
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2009, 07:33:19 PM »
Calley is great.  Quite a shame about getting out of modeling.  Too bad.
Check out our brand new, fully re-booted mega-site, PinupFiles/PinupGlam!  Featuring the best and hottest big boobed pinup gals on the web!



*

G_Wille

  • Banned User
  • 337
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2009, 08:51:24 PM »
I managed to find a few newer pics of her, but when I say few I really mean few.  Here's a tasty teaser.

   [image from a prohibited source removed]

Hagis2k's comment below is correct: the photo came from a prohibited site, and that can be proved in two different ways.  Since you've accumulated a string of warnings for posting prohibited content, you won't be able to post for the next two weeks.  

*

Hagis2k

  • E Cup
  • 276
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2009, 08:59:41 AM »
The last image is from   [snip]  afaik its not allowed here...

  I withdraw my earlier comment.  I failed to consider the context of your post.  I've removed the violation from your record.  As you said, the image was from a prohibited site and isn't allowed here.

*

never2big

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 34
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2009, 09:34:32 AM »
She's on **24**

*

G_Wille

  • Banned User
  • 337
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #9 on: February 20, 2009, 10:14:01 PM »
Not sure what or where you are referring to but the pic didn't come from a prohibited site.

and neither did this one.


 

*

G_Wille

  • Banned User
  • 337
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2009, 09:56:18 PM »
 
Quote:

 Hagis2k's comment below is correct: the photo came from a prohibited site, and that can be proved in two different ways.




Not sure what the "proof" is but it's faulty.  That pic may be there but it certainly isn't the only place it is.  She used to have a site at www.calleywestwood.co.uk/ which is no longer being maintained I assume because she gave up modeling.  The removed pic and others I have came from there.  I don't know what Calley has on that prohibited site you guys speak of but safe to say that plenty of amatuer models like herself will have some professionally done photographs on those sites.  It's actually how I discovered Rhian Sugden before she got as big as now. You'll definately see higher quality done photos of middle-tier models on the sites you speak of as well as duplicates pictures on other various "want-to-be" model websites.

*

gonZo

  • pain in the ass moderator
  • 9724
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2009, 01:26:30 PM »
You may have lots of pictures from calley westwood's old site, but the one I deleted wasn't downloaded from her site.  It was downloaded directly from a prohibited site.

*

G_Wille

  • Banned User
  • 337
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #12 on: March 15, 2009, 11:39:28 AM »
If you were correct I would agree with you.

*

DJPFC

  • Z Cup
  • 7571
    • http://www.pinupfiles.com
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #13 on: March 15, 2009, 12:30:25 PM »
This is obviously the biggest flaw in the "prohibited sites" rule here at the BEA.  If a photo is put on a model's official website it's allowed, but then if the model turns around and places that exact same photo on her My$pace page, suddenly it's not allowed.

Totally ridiculous.  I'm a huge fan of the Owner and I appreciate everything he does for us all here by hosting the BEA, but I've been saying for years that if he's really interested in protecting the BEA with a proper set of rules, then he needs to hire a real lawyer to advise him on such matters, because some parts of the current sets of rules only give the illusion of protection, while others are completely unnecessary.
Check out our brand new, fully re-booted mega-site, PinupFiles/PinupGlam!  Featuring the best and hottest big boobed pinup gals on the web!



*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Calley Westwood MERGED
« Reply #14 on: March 15, 2009, 04:07:11 PM »
Quote:

DJPFC said:
This is obviously the biggest flaw in the "prohibited sites" rule here at the BEA.  If a photo is put on a model's official website it's allowed, but then if the model turns around and places that exact same photo on her My$pace page, suddenly it's not allowed.

Totally ridiculous.  I'm a huge fan of the Owner and I appreciate everything he does for us all here by hosting the BEA, but I've been saying for years that if he's really interested in protecting the BEA with a proper set of rules, then he needs to hire a real lawyer to advise him on such matters, because some parts of the current sets of rules only give the illusion of protection, while others are completely unnecessary.




DJ, your opinion clearly differs with that of the Owner and that's all there is to it. We know FULL well that some images found on my$pace wouldn't violate any BEA policy (other than the no-my$space rule itself)... HOWEVER, since SO much OTHER problematic content DOES come from my$space, the Owner has determined that it's simply more practical to prohibit ALL my$space-sourced content completely. This has been explained before.