*

TheZookie007

  • L Cup
  • 53945
Re: Maximum natural breast size?
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2010, 09:26:09 PM »
The chances of randomly encountering 1 of these women is extremely rare.
(something on the order of 1:25,000,000)

To put that chance in perspective - In the whole of California there might be 2 women that fit these size criteria - Yes, two.

...and most likely, pedonbio has gone to bed with one of them, and DJPFC has photographed the other one.
AOC, HC, TW, BO, KH: FU. FUATH. 100x.

*

SamV

  • My bra size? A 34H - H is for 'HUGE, you know!'
  • 2483
  • SaRenna Lee - the "Joan Holloway" prototype!
Re: Maximum natural breast size?
« Reply #16 on: April 06, 2010, 12:46:18 PM »
Frankly, the 32L girls baffle me. I'm a 38H/I and I have no sense of balance most of the time. People tease me when I randomly wobble and try to regain my center of gravity. And I've got booty to cancel it out. Those girls are super slender except for their chests. They must topple over all the time!
Geez - now that gives me an idea.
We get a bunch of them to line up, give the first one a tiny push and then watch them go over like dominoes. ::) :-[ :o
 ;D



** SaRenna's very own Beta Baby **
The only thing in life you have to earn is love; everything else you can steal.
{ Recently Returned from Internet Limbo! }

*

Feral

  • E Cup
  • 1828
Re: Maximum natural breast size?
« Reply #17 on: April 06, 2010, 03:36:26 PM »
I dunno. I think there are more then 1 or 2 Cheron or Maxi types in Cali, or any state. They just might not think they are pretty enough or fit enough to model. Maybe they aren't quite as in shape and have a great body like Rachel or Chloe, but they aren't necessarily obese.

And then even if we don't rule out the obese ones, I think there are quite a few examples of still staggeringly huge bust to body ratios in larger women too. IF only we could line them all up and take measurements to work out what is the "magic" ratio. Like say, what is Rachel's bust to waist or height or hip or weight ratio compared to Norma's or Jodie 28K from "My big breasts and me."
« Last Edit: April 06, 2010, 03:39:35 PM by Feral »

*

Feral

  • E Cup
  • 1828
Re: Maximum natural breast size?
« Reply #18 on: April 06, 2010, 04:15:02 PM »
This picture of Donna Jones, the lady that took Rachel's title for the biggest in the U.K. seemed appropriate. If you can find the video of her news piece on line pay special attention to when she leans over the sink. Even though she is a big lady, her boob to body ratio is still extraordinary. And she claims to "only" be a 40M.

*

Djoser

  • X Cup
  • 8329
Re: Maximum natural breast size?
« Reply #19 on: April 06, 2010, 06:43:47 PM »
Ah only time will tell but i don't think we would see much change in average size between generations now on in the developed world...i could be wrong tho, but i think bustier ladies are more evident and numerous now because world population is bigger and because of health and food improvements. In underdeveloped countries howwver the big changes may have not yet come  ;D
Welcome to the internet, where men are men, women are men, and childr3n are the FBI

If it hurts, it means that you're still living

Avatar: beshine, morphed by uutexray, avatarized by AgentDee

*

Nimrod

  • KC Strip Artist
  • 2168
Re: Maximum natural breast size?
« Reply #20 on: April 06, 2010, 10:49:17 PM »
I dunno. I think there are more then 1 or 2 Cheron or Maxi types in Cali, or any state. They just might not think they are pretty enough or fit enough to model. Maybe they aren't quite as in shape and have a great body like Rachel or Chloe, but they aren't necessarily obese.

And then even if we don't rule out the obese ones, I think there are quite a few examples of still staggeringly huge bust to body ratios in larger women too. IF only we could line them all up and take measurements to work out what is the "magic" ratio. Like say, what is Rachel's bust to waist or height or hip or weight ratio compared to Norma's or Jodie 28K from "My big breasts and me."

That is not the question. The calculation was for 32M. California was used because of the population of the state. Yes, there are more women of larger bands and larger cups.

There are more 34M's (8,600) and even more 36M's (16,500) out there.

Also there are more 32L's (25,100) and yet again more 32K's (72,900).

There are about as many 32K's as the entire population of Wilmington, Delaware.

An M cup is large on any frame and between 4'-10" and 5'-10" there are at least 229,600 women with that cup size naturally.


EDIT: I went looking for my "Is she really big?" thread and found that most of the content has been lost due to the last major forum crash/hack. So that people do not feel I am just pulling these numbers out of my ass I think I should mention that there was a great deal of work and research and math behind my ISRB formula. The calculation holds up and compares to real-world statistics and medical data. Realize - the numbers above describe women with specifically that band and cup. In the future there may be need to reissue a refined chart to help quickly answer these relative size questions.
« Last Edit: April 07, 2010, 10:04:01 AM by Nimrod »
BE Together...

Images are (c) Nimrod unless noted otherwise

*

Feral

  • E Cup
  • 1828
Re: Maximum natural breast size?
« Reply #21 on: April 07, 2010, 01:28:30 PM »
That is not the question. The calculation was for 32M.

 ::) Sorry I didn't realize there was any real science behind those calculations. I was just posting my thoughts on anything K or up.