[fiveoh]

Looking for Sabrina Sabrok on Vida TV in the blue top probably about 2004-5?? Any ideas?

[tina83]

I'm also looking for one of her clips from an appearance on La Jaula or La Hora Pico. She was a patient of a psychiatrist in this clip.

[Rentahero]

This one?  I might have it, I'll have to look. 

[fiveoh]

Nothing on VidaTv? There is a screenshot on her site but says under construction??

[tina83]

That's not it. She wears white in this one and since it's a longer clip, that's why I think it's actually from La Jaula. The link for it on her website also says under construction. Hoping someone out there could help out.

[sm1tty]

Wow, brings back good memories.

[Hawk13]

I think I know which one your talking about either this one: (link removed), or where it says "psicologo" on the title and instead of a blue green skirt she wears like some skin tight black pants I think this guy might know where it is: http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1506, or check this site out: (link removed), well hope you get what your looking for oh and by the way here's a link to the youtube video this post has a picture of: http://www.youtube.com/v/vpTCtIapfUw

One link removed because the linked site features galleries of content prohibited by our rules. One link removed because the linked page included images of chi1dren. One link modified because the linked page included images of chi1dren.

Please read the Forum Rules (which you promised to follow when you registered) before you post anything else.

[Hawk13]

I apologize if anyone has been offended by these two sites I posted a link of it was not my intention to show whatever sick twisted ads it might show but the thing is I went to both these sites looking for anything on "La Hora Pico" Models like Sabrina sabrok and Ivonne soto and by I found them, I think it's safer to type than post a link to considering they show freaky ads everywhere on them...

(instructions to access prohibited webpage removed by moderator)
 
...the other link was to...

(identification of prohibited website removed by moderator)

anyways good news my friend gave me a link to the psychology video of Sabrina sabrok you've been wanting to see so here ya' guys go: http://rapidgator.net/file/c1cdee03d12460be0ff1f347a3ede300/ss_lj_2004_gabyybag.rar.html

Your original links were removed because they violated the Prohibited Content section of the Forum Rules. The rules exist to prevent users from posting links or content that could subject this forum to lawsuits or prosecution by law enforcement agencies. In this post, you attempted to publish the same prohibited site and page information via descriptions instead of links. A quick glance at the Forum Rules would have told you that that's also prohibited.

Since you seem to think your posts are so important that they're worth putting the entire forum at risk even after you've been warned about them, you will be unable to post here for the next month. You promised to follow the rules as a condition of your membership, and if you continue to violate them when you return, you'll be signifying your refusal to abide by your membership agreement, and your forum membership will be terminated.

- moderator

[tina83]

Thanks for the clip but I'm having trouble downloading from the site. Any help would be greatly appreciated. tina83

Mod edit: Tina, the file is corrupt or gone at Rapidgator and cannot be downloaded using the link Hawk provided. I've PMed him and asked him to re-UL and post a new link. -Palomine

[lars573]

File downloads fine. You just have to jump through that last hoop that rapid-gators has. Trying to force you to DL this accelerator thing.

Mod edit: yes, now it's working (12:30am Wednesday morning). Earlier today it was coming up with a 404 error page... maybe it was a problem with the Rapidgator server. -Pal

[Hawk13]

last time I was here I got kicked out so if any one has a question you mind as well PM me and look for the vids on hulu, YouTube, daily motion, or digital claw that's how I managed to find some of them and also thanks to fellow member gabyybag for helping me

Mod edit: if a post you made was moderated before, it's only because you broke the Owner's rules. If you were temp banned, it's only because you've broken the rules repeatedly despite being given multiple 'second chances.' To avoid both of those in the future, you merely have to read the rules and then consider them when you post.

My most recent notification to another user was not because they broke a rule (they didn't) but simply to inform them that a link they posted wasn't working (at the time). This was done simply as a courtesy, in hopes that they might fix it while the edit window was still open (for 24 hours after making a post, any user can edit or delete that post). Of course, by now, it's all moot. -Palomine

[Hawk13]

if any one still looking for this well here's the youtube link: (link removed)

There are images of chˇldren on the linked page. The forum cannot host images of chˇldren, or links to such images. As you were previously warned, you will no longer be able to post messages in the BEA forum.
- moderator

[slyguy]

There's images of children on just about every page on the internet...     I've been coming here for years, but lately from reading thru the forum, it seems you guys have gotten extra paranoid about the whole under@ge thing.  Can I ask what exactly it is you guys are so paranoid of??   I'm just trying to get a normal answer without being referred to the "user agreement" or some such, that does nothing to explain why...

**  Puts on flame-proof suit and prepares for Palomine's lengthy bit about "the owner this" and "the owner that"  **   

ban me if you must... but, hey, someone had to speak up. 

[gonZo]

There's images of children on just about every page on the internet...     I've been coming here for years, but lately from reading thru the forum, it seems you guys have gotten extra paranoid about the whole under@ge thing.  Can I ask what exactly it is you guys are so paranoid of??   I'm just trying to get a normal answer without being referred to the "user agreement" or some such, that does nothing to explain why...

**  Puts on flame-proof suit and prepares for Palomine's lengthy bit about "the owner this" and "the owner that"  **  

ban me if you must... but, hey, someone had to speak up.  

People don't get banned here for asking polite questions about site policies, so there's no need to prepare yourself for martyrdom.

"The owner this (and that)" comes up in these discussions because the BEA is his business, and he establishes whatever policies he deems appropriate, regardless of whether they seem reasonable to you. When you discuss site/forum policies, you're discussing the owner's decisions.

"...Chˇldren on just about every page of the internet" is a fairly wild exaggeration. Most porn sites make sure they're hosting zero content or links involving chˇldren. Is it unreasonable for the BEA, a porn site, to conduct itself like a porn site?

Here's what justifies our caution... On a porn site, any depiction of or reference to a chˇld is inappropriate and dangerous. Chˇld pornography is illegal, and the authorities' standards for what constitutes chˇld porn are loose enough that a totally benign photo of a kid on a porn site is sometimes all they need to prosecute. The BEA can't afford to be accused or prosecuted; if that happens, it's very likely that the site and forum will be shut down immediately. The BEA also has business partners who will refuse to work with it if it hosts anything involving minors (and several other types of undesirable content).

Yes, this stuff wasn't taken quite so seriously 10 years ago, but society takes it more seriously now, the authorities take it more seriously, and BEArchive is much more visible on the web than it once was. The risks are more substantial, so the site's policies are, too.

If you'd like to reply, please do so by PMing me, so we can try to get this error-plagued thread back on its rails. Thanks.
_
gonZo

Palomine adds: thanks gonZo for taking the time to elaborate. To Hawk (or anyone else interested) what gonZo outlined has already been explained in various posts many times over the years ...obviously, the elaboration isn't included in the rules themselves since we endeavor to keep them as brief as possible. Were we to explain in detail the reason/origin for each and every rule, they'd be pages long and no one would read them. But regardless of reason, as gonZo and I point out, this is the BEA Owner's site and his rules are the only ones that apply here, whether we like them or understand the need for them, etc... That's actually pretty simple it seems to me.