*

Hugeboobfan

  • F Cup
  • 595
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #225 on: October 15, 2008, 07:47:29 PM »
Quote:

vidiot said:
Quote:

2. Have boobs reduced for some silly reason (peer pressure, back pain, etc.).



As much as we are disappointed in what she did (and perhaps she herself is even more disappointed), I wouldn't call reduction for back pain silly ... provided that the back pain is (1) real, (2) not caused by something else like a bad mattress or bad posture and (3) not the result of a poorly fitted bra.



That's true.  That was poorly written.  Obviously if she was suffering with back pain it wouldn't be silly to get a reduction... I meant more of the situation where improper bra fittings and peer pressure combine to convince a girl that life will be hunky-dory with smaller breasts.

*

TripleB

  • F Cup
  • 683
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #226 on: October 15, 2008, 10:24:08 PM »
It is obviously her, and she clearly got a reduction.

*

zeo

  • E Cup
  • 822
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #227 on: October 15, 2008, 11:26:16 PM »
Quote:

ChrisR1 said:
I hate to shit on everyone's parade, but I can pretty much confirm it's her; in the attached comparison pics, look at the mole pattern from her left collar bone down to her cleavage - a perfect match.
And the worst part is, as if the reduction of that perfect pair weren't bad enough, she went to a hack surgeon that didn't even get both of her nips the same size




If it is her, the hack must have botched her nips in more than just size.  I'm not 100% convinced though. But it's probably as close as one can get online.

*

TripleB

  • F Cup
  • 683
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #228 on: October 15, 2008, 11:41:41 PM »
Usually when a woman with massive tits gets a reduction, they also have stretched areolas which are hardly identifiable, and as I've seen many times, are made to look like more distinguishable nipples with the reduction. I don't see why there is any debate as it is clearly her.

*

Goldeneye

  • The Midas Look
  • 12443
  • The Midas Look
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #229 on: October 16, 2008, 03:05:14 AM »
I didn't have to see any of these other posts; as soon as I clicked the first attachment I knew without a single doubt that it was her.

I agree with Cel; I'd rather this had remained a mystery forever lost to time. This is so creepy and disturbing and deeply, deeply, woefully, DEEPLY depressing. Jesus fucking HELL, what a tremendous waste. Perhaps it speaks to why I belong on this forum more than it speaks to anything else, but god almighty, it's shit like this more than anything else that makes me wonder and despise what this world has come to. I truly feel we would all be better for having never known this.

Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #230 on: October 16, 2008, 03:47:46 AM »
Talking about going down, that was sobering. I guess at least now she knows the difference between a pullup and a molicare. lol  I wonder if **39** fetish is a subset of pedophiliasm or if both are kind of independent. I also wonder if she also finds it depressing when she compares a pic of herself on spring break showing off her naturals wonders with a pic of her now in a **39**, or if she finds it a wonderful progression.
"Want to party like a Rockstar in LA? Drop me a pm!"

*

Hugeboobfan

  • F Cup
  • 595
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #231 on: October 16, 2008, 07:27:44 AM »
Quote:

wanna_party_inLA said:
Talking about going down, that was sobering. I guess at least now she knows the difference between a pullup and a molicare. lol  I wonder if **39** fetish is a subset of pedophiliasm or if both are kind of independent. I also wonder if she also finds it depressing when she compares a pic of herself on spring break showing off her naturals wonders with a pic of her now in a **39**, or if she finds it a wonderful progression.



For all we know she's always been into **39** fetishism and is very happy now.  

I'm going to have to find where I put that spring break wet tshirt contest clip of her and cry for a bit.

*

BTGlam

  • C Cup
  • 243
    • http://www.bigtitsglamour.com
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #232 on: October 16, 2008, 12:48:35 PM »
Quote:

BarnacleBill said:
 
Quote:

 I think she's been reduced. Her breasts look smaller, and the "sewn on" look of the areolas is probably from when they moved them up and reattached them during the surgery.
 




AGREE 100%

She was much bigger before, and the definite "sewn on" look.

Reduction.  Which begs the question, how much MORE money could that girl have made in amateur softcore porn if she would've kept her original, bigger, sexier, God-given boobs?

ANSWER:  A HELL OF A LOT MORE!!!!!!!




Yes Barnakle, those are reduced.
I remember her being so full and... lovely.
3 bad things:
-Undiscovered for so long time and have been "discovered" from that site that is not sure fitting for such a wonderful girl
-She deicded to reduce one of the most perfect pair of tits in the world
-The Doctor made a terrible job making a reduction of her Wonders! Different nips size


Something else?  

PS: her name is Chrissy there

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #233 on: October 16, 2008, 02:15:05 PM »
 Ok, so we're agreed it's her and again: well found.

Yes, she seems to have had a reduction... some can moan about it but of course (not being PC here) it's HER prerogative regardless of how any of us feel about it.

She's still appealing, though of course a shadow of her former self bust-wise.

The comment about stretched areolas, etc... seems likely... I've noticed slightly different sized areolas on other women who've had major reductions... perhaps it's unavoidable in some cases and not due to surgeon skill issues.

Still a cutie though... I could care less about the **39** stuff as it's not a fetish of mine, but the fact remains she's still got a cute face and decent rack.  

*

Hugeboobfan

  • F Cup
  • 595
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #234 on: October 16, 2008, 05:21:20 PM »
In all her former glory.

*

Goldeneye

  • The Midas Look
  • 12443
  • The Midas Look
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #235 on: October 16, 2008, 06:33:30 PM »
It's so strange to me that she decided to get them reduced but didn't go all that many cupsizes with it. She's a DD there--still huge by most standards, enough to be very, very conspicuous and to still cause back pain (if either of those were her reasons for the chopping). Why get anything altered? I just don't understand.

I'm not sure what makes me sadder, the reduction or the fact that she's doing this weird, very sleazy looking low-budget **39** porn that looks like some college kid is shooting it in his mom's basement. She's still so beautiful... Ahhh, it all makes me so profoundly sad.

*

funkyboobster

  • E Cup
  • 629
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #236 on: October 16, 2008, 08:58:05 PM »
I don't know whether to give out a primal scream or start sobbing uncontrollably.

Tragedy doesn't even begin to describe the situation.

*

Hugeboobfan

  • F Cup
  • 595
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #237 on: October 16, 2008, 09:01:19 PM »
I temporarily redid my avatar in tribute (and in loving memory).

*

TripleB

  • F Cup
  • 683
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #238 on: October 17, 2008, 02:21:41 AM »
Maybe she had them redone specifically to do photos or had them made smaller originally and then got implants. It's not unheard of. The new nipples are basically an elective concept.

*

Geeve

  • C Cup
  • 530
Re: 2002 Padre Island Spring Break Flasher Girl Found Again !
« Reply #239 on: October 17, 2008, 05:57:04 AM »
Probably to think she'll get more "mainstream" work.  For some reason people equate bigger areola to pregnancy or fat.  Especially with women if they're trying to follow Hollywood or pop trends.