*

BP

  • G Cup
  • 878
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #405 on: October 01, 2011, 08:32:52 PM »
Well said sir. Though I sure did miss her old dimensions. Absolutely perfect (and I'm generally a nats guy).

I agree with this assessment. She was one of the best of all time: in her prime, which some refer to as the 'Golden Age' of our preferred genre, she was always at the very top of any list of the best models. Yes, her outrageous body, gorgeous face and knee-weakening smile all contributed to her appeal, but it was also her personality, which came through in many of her videos.

She's different now... older (we all are) and smaller (than she was) to be sure, but still way desirable to any male mammal with a pulse. Frankly, I'm happily surprised that her breasts look as sweet and shapely as they do... after Busty Dusty (another 'Golden Age' fave) retired her giant implants, her breasts didn't look nearly as good as Tiffany's still do.

Tiffany's one of those women who's going to be 'severely fuckable' for years and years to come... I don't think she can help it and to be honest, in my opinion, it really doesn't have all that much to do with the size of her implants. :)

 


*

gOOber

  • Pic-O-Matic
  • 25236
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #406 on: October 05, 2011, 08:15:44 PM »
 :)
....rejoicing in the fullness thereof....

*

Magiciano

  • K Cup
  • 3987
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #407 on: January 12, 2012, 10:33:50 PM »
 :D

*

H_man

  • E Cup
  • 784
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #408 on: January 13, 2012, 01:11:22 AM »
I seem to recall that the downsizing wasn't entirely her idea. An implant failure plus the lack of super-sized replacements was the cause. That said, the surgeon who did the downsizing did a masterful job. Those are still some beautiful titties.

*

joeblow

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 25
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #409 on: April 02, 2012, 08:46:11 AM »
I lost everything. Does anyone still have this one? Thanks

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #410 on: April 02, 2012, 12:26:02 PM »
I lost everything. Does anyone still have this one? Thanks

I renamed the extension (change it back to .mpg after you DL it) and attached it to this post. It's the file that Chestnuts put on Rapidshare back in '07 that you asked for.

*

Demon

  • C Cup
  • 600
  • What I hope the wifee will be some day Thx Magic
    • Morph my wifee
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #411 on: April 03, 2012, 01:12:47 AM »
I renamed the extension (change it back to .mpg after you DL it) and attached it to this post. It's the file that Chestnuts put on Rapidshare back in '07 that you asked for.
something is wrong with the jpg it will not open for me


That's because it's not a jpg. Please read Palomine's message immediately before yours.
_
gonZo


Pal says: yes... I just called it '.jpg' in order to attach it to the forum post... just download it and then edit the extension back to ".mpg" and it will run fine.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 08:11:08 PM by Palomine »

*

joeblow

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 25
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #412 on: April 03, 2012, 02:31:48 AM »
Thank you Palomine

Happy to help! :) -Pal
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 08:09:20 PM by Palomine »

*

roberttoddy

  • A Cup
  • 335
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #413 on: December 26, 2012, 11:49:28 PM »
I have often wondered why Tiffany Towers super huge fake tits were so squishy, jiggly, and overall realistic...they remind me of wendy fiore's beautiful real breasts.  Tiffany was in the era of the super titters...sarenna, lisa lipps, busty dusty, but even the jiggly tit queen angeliques boobs were firmer and clearly appeared more fake(though no less boner inducing). Why were tiffany boobs so different???

Mod edit to remove Score image. -Pal
« Last Edit: December 09, 2014, 10:59:16 PM by Palomine »

*

Nakhakren

  • E Cup
  • 809
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #414 on: December 27, 2012, 12:09:41 AM »
As I understand it, part of the reason Tiffany's breasts appeared so soft and 'real' was due to her implants being filled with silicone, rather than saline or other, similar substances.  Silicone implants, I'm told, have a consistency that is much closer to actual breast tissue - especially at larger sizes - than other, comparably sized implants.

I'm hardly an expert however.  Someone with more knowledge of Tiffany and her career might be able to say more.
"God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension."
- Freeman Dyson

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83858
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #415 on: December 27, 2012, 12:13:44 AM »
I believe it was  because she was blessed with natural D cups and therefore had more skin to begin with. Most of the other were naturally smaller. Besides, skin pliability is different between women. Beshine started as a A - B cup yet she is now out of the alphabet while some who are naturally bigger would find it impossible to get so large. But to me Tiffany's greatest asset was her overall BEAuty. Even if she had never augmentated herself she just had that gorgeous face, smoking hot legs and ass and just sexy aura to make men melt in her hands. My $0.02.  :)

*

FourHooksPlus

  • A Cup
  • 268
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #416 on: December 27, 2012, 12:27:56 AM »
As I understand it, part of the reason Tiffany's breasts appeared so soft and 'real' was due to her implants being filled with silicone, rather than saline or other, similar substances.  Silicone implants, I'm told, have a consistency that is much closer to actual breast tissue - especially at larger sizes - than other, comparably sized implants.

I'm hardly an expert however.  Someone with more knowledge of Tiffany and her career might be able to say more.

I thought it was the opposite: underfilled saline implants as opposed to the overfilled silicone that was the norm for the late-eighties supertitters. Although I likewise defer to someone with more knowledge than I...

*

Offline

  • D Cup
  • 725
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #417 on: December 27, 2012, 07:08:27 AM »
I think FourHooks is correct on this.  If you watch carefully in many of her videos, you can see rippling along the sides of her breasts.  Take a good look at the above photo and you can see some rippling on the inside side of her right breast.  For the record I loved her squishy monsters and love seeing rippling when it does occur. I wonder if she ever planned on having them pumped up further at some point, but for her own reasons thought she was big enough.

*

solvegas

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 83858
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #418 on: December 27, 2012, 08:12:07 AM »
I think FourHooks is correct on this.  If you watch carefully in many of her videos, you can see rippling along the sides of her breasts.  Take a good look at the above photo and you can see some rippling on the inside side of her right breast.  For the record I loved her squishy monsters and love seeing rippling when it does occur. I wonder if she ever planned on having them pumped up further at some point, but for her own reasons thought she was big enough.


From what I remember one of her implants failed and she was unable to get another of that size or even bigger because DowCorning and other manufacturers stopped their manufacture during the great silicone witch hunt of the late 90's which to this day has made manufacturers stay away from making huge implants even though studies from Harvard, FDA and other sources came to the conclusion that silicone DID NOT cause any of the problems it was blamed on. The FDA still prohibits the huge sizes because deep down there are many in the agency which view women with such proportions with disdain and comptent but conceal it with " scientific " objections.  >:(

*

Ronnie be good

  • A Cup
  • 165
Re: Tiffany Towers MERGED
« Reply #419 on: December 27, 2012, 06:28:27 PM »
I did love her tits for that reason (though I do love fake tits for that reason too). I've always wondered, had Tiffany got even bigger, to say Minka or larger size, would her tits keep that natural look, or not?