*

Daniel

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 22
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #210 on: August 31, 2005, 07:36:32 PM »
That's probably the biggest cause as to why her boobs got so huge. But yet, they still seemed to flucuate a lot years after she had her kid, which was like in 1996, so it can't totally be attributed to her prior pregnancy.

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #211 on: August 31, 2005, 10:40:45 PM »
Yes I know she's had at least one [censored] (who I think has CP or something like that)... and of course pregnancy plays a role... as does nursing. What's odd is that her fluctuations seem sudden and ongoing... up and down rapidly.... subsequent episodes of JSM (presumably filmed roughly in sequence) often show rapid changes.

As for the other actresses mentioned... yes.. some also fluctuate quite a bit... but Jen Con and Teri H pretty much just seem (to me) to decrease in size due to age/weight loss... not go up and down all that much. As for Julia Roberts... excepting her recent size boost from pregnancy, I think 90% of her prior fluctuation is mostly attributable to costume/dress. SMG I don't know as much about fluctation wise, etc...

Great LSG BE btw... muchly appreciated!

*

Leucippus

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 4
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #212 on: September 01, 2005, 02:42:48 AM »
My wife's overall build is very similar to Laura San Giacomo's and I've seen my wife's size vary as dramatically as is seen in the pictures in this thread.  And the bra itself can make significant differences.

My wife was at DD when we were first married, and with pregnancy she went up and down quite a bit, topping out at an H and then coming back down to DD to E.  Her size can change by at least a full letter up or down depending on what's going on, cycle, activity level, angular moment of spinning tops in Kazakhistan, and whatever other mystical breast-resizifying powers exist...  
This doesn't even reflect changes she's experienced due to wait loss or gain over the years, which have been even more dramatic.  In my experience with her and past girlfriends, it seems to me that larger busted women change size more apparently for various reasons than smaller busted women.

But when it gets down to it all I can say is, "Hooray for boobies!"

*

steveo

  • L Cup
  • 1839
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #213 on: September 01, 2005, 04:44:07 AM »
Quote:

Quote:

no way that this is 4 real, ay? that must be a morph of lovely laura? savvy?




< voice: crocodile dundee; >That's not a morph, this is a morph! < / voice >




Ha! That morph is what the BEA is all about, Dr_Fashizzle! And you did a great job with less than optimal pic to work from...

For andyschuhmacher... of course that was a morph, and in case you missed it, here is another version here (with nipples):

http://forum.bearchive.com/showflat.php?...true#Post373312
So, do you like big tits, or huge tits? ... U.S. Marshal Quigley

*

ZoD

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 7773
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #214 on: September 01, 2005, 12:06:57 PM »
Thats true. Women with larger breasts do  appear to fluctuate more than flatter women. I notice my bustier friends and gf's size changes ect more so than other women - but that may also be the disproportionat eamount of time i spend looking at larger breasted women than at smaller chested ones.

So i think there is truth in a larger size difference increase/decrease but proportionally similar.
«Zoneofdecay on the outside, tasty on the inside.»

*

LostReality

  • E Cup
  • 361
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #215 on: September 01, 2005, 05:10:28 PM »
fo shizzle my "that's not a knife" nizzle!  


steveo i'm impressed - by your subtle logo - and your great job morphing this great woman to such great dimensions.

I hereby officially grant you the appealing status of a fully armed and loaded Goldmember


never mind, i just thought it would make me sound cool  

also i allowed myself to attach another picture...i'm sure that its gotta be morphed but i'll better ask the pro's for theis honorable opinion

*

auto_reply

  • Moderator
  • 2754
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #216 on: September 01, 2005, 07:23:10 PM »
Its a morph, but what does it have to do with LSG?
*You have reached the Automated Moderation System. In the event of an actual breast expansion emergency, the Attention Signal you just heard would have been followed by official information, news or instructions.*

Xenocrates:
"I have often repented speaking, but never of holding my tongue."

*

Daniel

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 22
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #217 on: September 02, 2005, 02:01:21 PM »
Here's a nice collage of Laura's rack out in full force. She almost never wears skin-tight tops like this red one as her enormous boobs just totally bust out. When it comes to actresses in Hollywood, only Laura San Giacomo can make it seem like her boobs are her whole upper torso, her boobs are just that ridiciculously oversized for her small frame.



For Laura's sake, it would help if she didn't wear her pants/skirts so high, especially considering how low her massive boobs tend to go. Now granted, she's sitting here, but still, that is quite a sight to behold.

*

PregNut

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 5929
  • Pregnancy: Mother Nature's BE.
    • http://forum.bearchive.com/index.php/topic,155796.msg157416.html#msg157416
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #218 on: September 02, 2005, 09:05:32 PM »
Keep an eye out for the JSM episode featuring Elliott's mentally-challenged brother (I think) played by David Cross (I don't recall the episode title).
Elliott invites Maya to Thanksgiving dinner, and while at his apartment before dinner, she removes her sweater.
I distinctly remember saying "GOD-DAYM!" the first time I saw that.
"Whenever someone talks about doing something for reasons of justice, you should put your hand in your pocket, because you're about to get it picked."

Avatar courtesy of Getty Images.

*

Dr_Fashizzle

  • Fizzle Cup
  • 2671
  • Occupation: Muthafuckin Hustler
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #219 on: September 03, 2005, 01:32:26 AM »
"Chickin pot, Chickin pot, Chikin pot piiiiiiie"

The reveal:
 

*

steveo

  • L Cup
  • 1839
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #220 on: September 03, 2005, 05:45:06 AM »
Quote:

fo shizzle my "that's not a knife" nizzle!  

steveo i'm impressed - by your subtle logo - and your great job morphing this great woman to such great dimensions.

I hereby officially grant you the appealing status of a fully armed and loaded Goldmember

never mind, i just thought it would make me sound cool  
..




Thanks... yeah that's cool!
So, do you like big tits, or huge tits? ... U.S. Marshal Quigley

*

Dr_Fashizzle

  • Fizzle Cup
  • 2671
  • Occupation: Muthafuckin Hustler
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #221 on: September 03, 2005, 09:05:17 AM »
Nice one!

*

Daniel

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 22
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #222 on: September 03, 2005, 12:43:52 PM »
Nice caps! It says that episode aired January 5, 1999, so it was taped in late-1998. Compare Laura's breast size to the season before and there is quite a difference as her boobs weren't so ridiculously huge in the earlier episodes of Just Shoot Me. I'd sure like to know as to what went on underneath those shirts in between Season 2 and Season 3. It's like she jumped at least a cup size almost overnight sometime in 1998.

*

MaxBigfoot

  • ZZZ Cup
  • 33743
  • Maximum Manga Maven
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #223 on: September 03, 2005, 12:50:11 PM »
I find it a damn shame that such a shapely and beautiful woman has never done a really sexy photoshoot.  If I had to venture a guess, I'd say she must be trying her best to be known as an actress only and not a sex object.  To me, that's too one dimensional thinking.  Considering how many other good looking actresses with careers that are doing well are appearing in FHM and othe magazines of that ilk, I don't see it as all that valid a reason any more.  This is all a hypothesis, of course.

What it really is, is I sure wish I had seen some photos of that woman in a bikini!  

MaxBigfoot


I apologize in advance if I post duplicate pictures in any of the picture threads I deal in.  My MO in getting pictures of one girl is to rip her Instagram.  That ends up with me having up to 2000 pics of her.  I've tried almost half a dozen duplicate finder programs, and none of them find all of the duplicates I inevitably end up with.

*

Daniel

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 22
Re: Laura San Giacomo In Tight Top
« Reply #224 on: September 03, 2005, 03:32:29 PM »
Here's a pic of Laura's rack looking really, REALLY huge. It's probably the largest I've ever seen Laura on Just Shoot Me. I think this shot is good example of her fluctuating breast size as that's pretty huge for even her standards. Nevertheless, those boobs are simply amazing.

Quote:

I find it a damn shame that such a shapely and beautiful woman has never done a really sexy photoshoot.  If I had to venture a guess, I'd say she must be trying her best to be known as an actress only and not a sex object.  To me, that's too one dimensional thinking.  Considering how many other good looking actresses with careers that are doing well are appearing in FHM and othe magazines of that ilk, I don't see it as all that valid a reason any more.  This is all a hypothesis, of course.

What it really is, is I sure wish I had seen some photos of that woman in a bikini!  




She did a lot of sexy movies/shoots when she was younger. But as she got older and her breast size increased, then she didn't really do sexy stuff anymore. I think her sexy days are pretty much over.

I'd sure love to see her in a bikini, it would be quite a sight. Unfortunately, her boobs hang really low and are rather saggy. Even when she has bra support, they hang really low. Just think how low they would go without the aid of a bra. Seeing Laura in a bikini is a distant dream.