[tdotter]

 

[zeo]

Now that's something I've never seen on the Chicago Lake front trail...



(yes, I know that's some other place far away)

[PiranhaTheMorpher]

Speaking of Wendy's old photos, this is probably the best big boob image in existence. Certainly my favorite photo of Wendy.

Damn, I miss the SBB girls.

[Bramlet]

Speaking of Wendy's old photos, this is probably the best big boob image in existence. Certainly my favorite photo of Wendy.

Damn, I miss the SBB girls.

Me too...

[AgentDee]

I have to agree with my buds above that pic of her in that way too tight (but I had zero problems with it lol) blue shirt is probably one of my ALL time fave pics of her.

AD

[Rentahero]

Let's see what else I have.

[gonZo]

We've taken the majority of the last page of this thread offline for editing because the discussion progressed from criticism of Wendy's site to unjustified criticism of her personality. Please confine your criticism to content, not people.

[ROUNDandHEAVY]

Oh boy.

[AgentDee]

okay I have nothing to say but this:

LOOK

BOOBS!

AD

[Live4Tits]

We've taken the majority of the last page of this thread offline for editing because the discussion progressed from criticism of Wendy's site to unjustified criticism of her personality. Please confine your criticism to content, not people.

Who decides if it's unjustified? Is justified criticism of personalities allowed?

And when you say to keep criticism to content and not people, are you strictly referring to when speaking about models? Or does that include other members on this forum? And that goes for everybody right?

I'm just a little confused by this, a little clarity is all.

[Robin_K2]

I'm just a little confused by this, a little clarity is all.

As Pal said:
confine your criticism to content, not people.
(I am not a moderator, just another member.)

[Live4Tits]

As Pal said:
confine your criticism to content, not people.
(I am not a moderator, just another member.)

Actually, gonzo said that. But thanks.

[Palomine]

Who decides if it's unjustified? Is justified criticism of personalities allowed?

And when you say to keep criticism to content and not people, are you strictly referring to when speaking about models? Or does that include other members on this forum? And that goes for everybody right?

I'm just a little confused by this, a little clarity is all.

Absolutely nothing has changed here.

It's always been the BEA Owner's policy to permit users to express negative or contrary opinions, provided that they do so in a manner that doesn't create potential liability for the forum (i.e.: "crosses the line"). Recent posts made about Wendy DID cross that line, and if left up, they *could* have attracted unwanted attention to the forum, so they have been removed. Some of the current rules and more than a few special restrictions that are applied to individual users DID come into existence because those users habitually and endlessly b1tched about a model and eventually, that model (or her legal rep) noticed, got in touch, etc... The BEA Owner has no tolerance for that kind of needless agita, so he instructs users not to cross that line, and mods to make sure of it.

The posted rules and FAQ policies should not be considered to be exhaustive by any stretch of the imagination... they can't possibly preempt every possible variation of human behavior that might happen here. Thus, the Owner provides discretion for mods to intervene when anything happens that could be counterproductive to the health (legal, morale, or otherwise) of this forum and community. Anyone who can't accept that should go try to find some other forum that will let them do whatever they like w/o regard for consequences, or perhaps set up their own.

General guideline: if you're not sure that something negative/critical you wish to post about a model is OK or not, either PM a mod first to ask, or simply err on the side of caution and don't post it at all.

[loveemhuge]

Mod edit to remove personal/personality-based comments/comparisons about this model (if you recall what you wrote here, you'll understand why it was inappropriate and removed). We've left your other/reasonably-presented comments about your experience of her current updating practices below. -Pal

I will not talk anymore after this on the issue.
so everyone is clear.
wendy does not update anymore, only has you pay for text chats.
ok that is her choice.
but is it reasonable to tell everyone in advance so not create people signing up under a false pretense?
i have never heard her say on a chat or through twitter.
that is all i am stating her, no anger or malice.
i leave everyone else to decided what the truth of it is.
I apologize if opened the site to a legal ramification.
that was not my intent.

[Palomine]

Following his previous moderated post, user loveemhuge decided to pat himself on the back by repeating/reposting his latest insulting witticism about this model. For that, and everything else he's done (including his lion's share of the more-than-two-dozen posts that were excised from this thread) and for reposting comments after a mod removed them, he's earned two weeks off. If he tries to participate during his temp ban in any way (other accounts, by proxy, etc...) the temp ban will autoconvert to permanent.