[MoCheeks]

Grendel, you are a god among mortals.
BulletBoobBabe, if you really do know her, express our gratitude to her for...  for...  well just being her.  And let her know that more camera time, anywhere, anyplace, will not go unappreciated here at the BEA.

[ThomasSchmidt]

Had to delete it - sadly.

[Glottis]

She's been mentioned here before, and all the threads have been deleted due to overmentioning of other sites that we don't talk about here.

edit: oh yeah, also (and more importantly) what is said below. Most likely due to creepy people harassing her.

[G_I_John]

In other words, CPG...

Who asked for all her imagry to be banned on this site...

Yeah it's a bummer I know

[ThomasSchmidt]

Quote:
She's been mentioned here before, and all the threads have been deleted due to overmentioning of other sites that we don't talk about here.

edit: oh yeah, also (and more importantly) what is said below. Most likely due to creepy people harassing her.

I doubt this will come from BEA members, since she's built quite a following elsewhere that exceeds the total number of members on this board. And last I checked, surrealchicago pictures are not forbidden here - at least I have seen plenty of other threads where pictures from surreal and other party picture sites such as napkinnights are being posted. If someone has a notification of Wendy that she doesn't wish to be discussed here, I will of course delete the thread asap.

[Merita]

Quote:

Quote:
She's been mentioned here before, and all the threads have been deleted due to overmentioning of other sites that we don't talk about here.

edit: oh yeah, also (and more importantly) what is said below. Most likely due to creepy people harassing her.

I doubt this will come from BEA members, since she's built quite a following elsewhere that exceeds the total number of members on this board. And last I checked, surrealchicago pictures are not forbidden here - at least I have seen plenty of other threads where pictures from surreal and other party picture sites such as napkinnights are being posted. If someone has a notification of Wendy that she doesn't wish to be discussed here, I will of course delete the thread asap.

Sadly, from the rules:

Do not post the following content in any form:

    * CPG (Chicago Party Girl) including content from ........com.

And yes - this is CPG as mentioned.

[ThomasSchmidt]

Alright, I deleted it, but I still wonder who added this rule and why.

It's funny since the mentioning of her web site in the rules directly leads to her ******* profile, which is prohibited here. So if you mention that, you get a ban, even though the link that gets you the ban is included in the forum rules. If you don't want to get a ban, you better delete her web site URL from your quotation of the forum rules.

[Merita]

Quote:
Alright, I deleted it, but I still wonder who added this rule and why.

It's funny since the mentioning of her web site in the rules directly leads to her ******* profile, which is prohibited here. So if you mention that, you get a ban, even though the link that gets you the ban is included in the forum rules. If you don't want to get a ban, you better delete her web site URL from your quotation of the forum rules.

Well, it'd be a strange old world if one were to be banned for quoting the BEA rule!  

That said, better safe than sorry...

Then again, to return to the original subject matter - she really is quite a sight for sore eyes

[ThomasSchmidt]

Quote:

Quote:
Alright, I deleted it, but I still wonder who added this rule and why.

It's funny since the mentioning of her web site in the rules directly leads to her ******* profile, which is prohibited here. So if you mention that, you get a ban, even though the link that gets you the ban is included in the forum rules. If you don't want to get a ban, you better delete her web site URL from your quotation of the forum rules.

Well, it'd be a strange old world if one were to be banned for quoting the BEA rule!  

That said, better safe than sorry...

Then again, to return to the original subject matter - she really is quite a sight for sore eyes

I have been banned two times for minor offenses (once for the mere mentioning of the site which shall not be named, but is linked in the forum rules itsself), so I'm like "discretion is the better part of valor". Before each posting you better think carefully about if you could violate a rule with your posting.

I'd still like to know why it's not allowed to mention her and her site(s) (which are linked in the forum rules) here. Did something happen in the past?

[Glottis]

Like we have already said, SHE requested to not be posted here anymore. As in she doesn't want us to post pictures of her on this site, and since we are a peaceful forum, we choose to honor other people's wishes instead of trying to stick it to the moderators.

[ThomasSchmidt]

Quote:
Like we have already said, SHE requested to not be posted here anymore. As in she doesn't want us to post pictures of her on this site, and since we are a peaceful forum, we choose to honor other people's wishes instead of trying to stick it to the moderators.

If you have paid closer attention to what I said, you would have realized that it is not about honoring people's wishes (what I do and have always done), but about a contradiction in the forum rules itsself. It is not allowed to post links of sites that lead directly to profiles of the social network that shall not be named here, yet the very same rules do exactly that. Thus the rules need to be edited and that link to her site deleted.

[Glottis]

Quote:
If you have paid closer attention to what I said, you would have realized that it is not about honoring people's wishes (what I do and have always done), but about a contradiction in the forum rules itsself. It is not allowed to post links of sites that lead directly to profiles of the social network that shall not be named here, yet the very same rules do exactly that. Thus the rules need to be edited and that link to her site deleted.

Oh, ok.

Quote:
Alright, I deleted it, but I still wonder who added this rule and why.

Why did you say this, then? The rule was added because she doesn't want people posting her pictures here. Honoring her wishes means not posting stuff about her, here.


It sounds like you are trying to justify your breaking of the rules (which is not a big deal, it happens 10x a day) by saying that the forum rules are breaking themselves because they reference her website which happens to have a link to her page at the other website. If you really think that we shouldn't mention the website that is banned in the forum rules, then you should PM a moderator instead of hopping in circles in this thread.

[Palomine]

Quote:

Quote:
If you have paid closer attention to what I said, you would have realized that it is not about honoring people's wishes (what I do and have always done), but about a contradiction in the forum rules itsself. It is not allowed to post links of sites that lead directly to profiles of the social network that shall not be named here, yet the very same rules do exactly that. Thus the rules need to be edited and that link to her site deleted.

Oh, ok.

Quote:
Alright, I deleted it, but I still wonder who added this rule and why.

Why did you say this, then? The rule was added because she doesn't want people posting her pictures here. Honoring her wishes means not posting stuff about her, here.


It sounds like you are trying to justify your breaking of the rules (which is not a big deal, it happens 10x a day) by saying that the forum rules are breaking themselves because they reference her website which happens to have a link to her page at the other website. If you really think that we shouldn't mention the website that is banned in the forum rules, then you should PM a moderator instead of hopping in circles in this thread.

OK, aside from the fact that CPG was posted in the first place (but no violation was logged since the user deleted it himself before a mod found it) this is not a huge deal. As mentioned, the CPG prohibition was added at her request as is our general policy. The reason for her request is not our concern, we just honor it as a courtesy. Re: the 'link' to that site in the rules itself... because the domain extension was included, most browsers will show it as a clickable link. To placate anyone concerned, I edited it to remove the extension, but left the domain itself for the same reason we name all prohibited sources... so users will KNOW what's not allowed.

Let's all move on now, ok? Thanks. -Pal  

[SwitcherX]

Quote:
The reason for her request is not our concern, we just honor it as a courtesy.

Guys send her really, really, really retarded messages which go far beyond the norms of polite society.  

[Dick_Woods]

I can definately see how that happened Switch, but I have to tell ya, I doubt the moronic messages came from here...

Jane has a M*SP*** account and she gets a shitload of boorish messages...Never Once has anyone from the BEA been an asshole to her though...most of the guys that ask "Can I Fuck Your Titties?" just simply lack manners but we've never thought for a second that any of them came from here...its a wonder she can resist such charm though, huh??

Fortunately for Jane, she is a little older than CPG, and has had a little more experience handling assholes...