[TheZookie007]

I'm stunned that Zookie has missed this entire thread...and in the GD forum, too!

I guess when you're so busy posting, you forget to read as well!

Q-"Poor Zookster"-BE

I had ignored that entire thread all this time, thinking that it was going to involve a woman with falsies or something...how wrong I was! My favorite quote from that thread so far came when somnophorev2 asked her, "how big is too big for me?" and she responds:

"Too big is when they have already reached size 38 H and I have no idea when they would like to stop growing!!! [I knew I'd] lost control of my body when I realized they grow by one more cup size every year..."

Talk about making you want to pop...!

[Goldeneye]

Yeah, my first post^^

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, no no no no no no no...you gotta delete that picture NOW. Better to ask questions after--delete it now and one of us will clarify when there's more time. (I have to run soon.) Read the rules, for starters. That picture can get you in trouble here.

[Edward_Hyde]

But she isn't under 18... she's 20 years old ... if that should be the problem...

there are much more pics of her in the internet...


so what's the problem?

[gonZo]

But she isn't under 18... she's 20 years old ... if that should be the problem...

there are much more pics of her in the internet...

so what's the problem?

As I suggested, please read the Forum Rules before posting again. In most places, the girl is listed as being 17 years old, not 20, and the surroundings in most of her pictures seem to confirm that she's in high school. Because of that, all photos of this model are prohibited in this forum.

Also, the file you posted was downloaded from my$pace, and we prohibit all my$pace photos.

Pal adds: also, the rules that you already agreed to abide by when you registered make it clear that if a subject even looks as if other users might consider her to appear to be underag3, that image CANNOT be posted here. Any 'facts' you think you have (or genuinely posses) that the subject is 18 or older is moot... it's the appearance of the photo, and how others might perceive it that is the litmus test. When in doubt, please err on the side of caution and DON'T POST QUESTIONABLE CONTENT. This site has been here for years before your post, and we'd like to insure that it remains here for our thousands of users for years to come. Thanks in advance for your cooperation, your restraint and for re-reading the site rules.

[paula382236]

I don't know her name (Saskia?) but she can call me Pops!

[pedonbio]

She can call me Squirt if she wants...

[luvdemwhoppers]

I'd eat a mile.........

[espy]

I don't know her name (Saskia?) but she can call me Pops!

Saskia Howard Clarke... and she's MINE I tell you -- all MINE!!   

[luvdemwhoppers]

huh? there is a line here, please.....

[Goldeneye]

That picture looks either morphed or airbrushed as hell.

[Djoser]

Even so if it makes the guy pop, is as valid as any other pic 

[TheZookie007]

I don't know her name (Saskia?) but she can call me Pops!

That is Big Brother UK contestant Saskia Howard-Clarke, but her cleavage looks more than a little airbrushed in that picture. Still entirely poppable though

[d_jnes]

This pic is doing it for me this week.  I looove the projection!

[Djoser]

wow!  whos her, d_jnes?

[pedonbio]

Sometimes you just have to choose...