*

big_is_good

  • B Cup
  • 505
Re: Chelsea Photoclub update Ho Hum
« Reply #15 on: July 06, 2007, 02:19:37 PM »
"It's based on the many posts in different forums . . . "

Uh, oh! There's that word again (many). Thank you for proving my point.
I knew you'd be unable to resist responding. I must have hit a nerve. I'm sure "many" of us would agree.

*

Cris_H

  • A Cup
  • 672
Re: Chelsea Photoclub update Ho Hum
« Reply #16 on: July 06, 2007, 10:35:35 PM »
Quote:

"Uh, oh! There's that word again (many). Thank you for proving my point.
I knew you'd be unable to resist responding. I must have hit a nerve. I'm sure "many" of us would agree.



Well, of course I'm going to respond when someone attacks me without provocation.  

I now see that you can not back up your arguments and are only interested in stirring up someone's anger simply for the fun of it.  This is far worse than simply complaining about an aspect of a website where one is open to discussion.  You are simply attempting to provoke flaming, apparently.  Good luck.  I can't get angry at someone who ignores all of my arguments and then smugly resorts to using a key word designed to irritate:

"Uh, oh! There's that word again (many). Thank you for proving my point."  

How you figure this proves anything is beyond me as I was referring to posts I have actually seen, not an assumed group of people that I wish agreed with me.

I'm not sure why you picked on me to attack, unprovoked, in the first place.  (Most unfriendly.)  For someone who doesn't like to waste their time complaining, you certainly like to waste it by being rather annoying.  At this, you have succeeded, sir.  Congratulations.
~Cris
all photos © Cris

*

big_is_good

  • B Cup
  • 505
Re: Chelsea Photoclub update Ho Hum
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2007, 02:45:02 AM »
Thank you for proving my point — again. I apologize for stirring up your anger, as you put it. I'm not sure how questioning your argument is a bad thing. I do  find it comical, not just with you, but "many" others when they use that to justify their own complaint about a website, restaurant, etc. It's kind of like they're not fully confident of their complaint/argument and need to back it up by offering up a nameless/faceless number of people, whether it be two or two hundred, whose to know. I personally, yes I, have noticed at least a few complaints/negative posts written/typed by you at two forums for sure. There may be "many" more, but I can't confirm that, so I will refrain from using that term. Enjoy the site(s), (I'm relatively sure "many" will agree with that).

*

Cris_H

  • A Cup
  • 672
Re: Chelsea Photoclub update Ho Hum
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2007, 03:14:21 AM »
Hee hee hee!  I'd forgotten about this thread and just happened across it.  Oh my...  I had to reread this & respond even though it's, like, from a hundred years ago.  

Oh, you did not stir up my anger.  You don't really read the posts you respond to, do you?  And questioning my argument is not a bad thing.  I never said that.  Silly boy.  Question it all you want.  Now, if you'll excuse me, I must go and complain at many more websites because I'm just an old curmudgeon.  I've proved your point again!  Hoo hoo!  

"You're a very silly man and I'm not going to interview you."
~Cris
all photos © Cris