*

Real

  • G Cup
  • 2479
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #375 on: August 19, 2010, 11:57:54 AM »
somebody needs to resuscitate this thread.

i vote another pic of nancy's giant juggs please.
My current avatar is: Manda Dawn

*

rebel6731

  • C Cup
  • 143
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #376 on: August 19, 2010, 06:53:43 PM »
I don't believe this one has been posted here yet.

Cheers!

*

cocky25

  • A Cup
  • 132
  • "Thank God for Chelsea, and Silicone!"
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #377 on: August 19, 2010, 07:13:54 PM »
Awesome.

Look at the angle of the sunglasses. They don't sit straight. That's nearly 45 degrees?

Would love to see her in a large bra.
"Kudos to AgentDee for designing my avatar!"

*

funkyboobster

  • E Cup
  • 629
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #378 on: August 19, 2010, 11:56:45 PM »
Interesting!  Now I'm wondering if the person who postulated 38 KK just pulled the number out of thin air or if he/she had some inner knowledge about Nancy and that the number might be her true bra size.


No way she has a band size of 38".  I'd say 34 to 36 tops.  She's a slim and petite lady. 

*

vidiot

  • D Cup
  • 196
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #379 on: August 20, 2010, 05:20:14 AM »
No way she has a band size of 38".  I'd say 34 to 36 tops.  She's a slim and petite lady. 

Yes, but many (perhaps most) very busty women wear a bra with a band size too big, in order to get something that is big enough to hold their breasts.

*

Real

  • G Cup
  • 2479
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #380 on: August 21, 2010, 08:25:28 PM »
So about a month ago, NQ posted the question of How do you measure success?, to which someone- a woman or a guy posing as a woman replied "a 38 KK cup". That reply and person have vanished from her page.

smh there's always got to be one moron.  that's really going to encourage her to put more photos on the internet.  ::)
My current avatar is: Manda Dawn

*

funkyboobster

  • E Cup
  • 629
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #381 on: August 22, 2010, 10:01:32 PM »
Yes, but many (perhaps most) very busty women wear a bra with a band size too big, in order to get something that is big enough to hold their breasts.

A woman of Nancy's means can afford to have a proper fitting.   In all photos I've seen, she appears to have well fitting bras. 

*

vidiot

  • D Cup
  • 196
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #382 on: August 22, 2010, 10:30:07 PM »
A woman of Nancy's means can afford to have a proper fitting.
It's not about affording it; many busty women just don't know where to get a proper fitting, or that a proper fitting bra would significantly improve their comfort.  My ex-gf was one such woman.

Quote
In all photos I've seen, she appears to have well fitting bras.
Her bras are not so glaringly ill-fitting that it's obvious through her clothes, but it's hard to tell how well they really fit without seeing her in just a bra.

*

titorteat

  • A Cup
  • 1358
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #383 on: August 24, 2010, 05:25:28 AM »
That sofa is a busty lady magnet.  ;)
|titor|

*

Bftfan

  • E Cup
  • 347
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #384 on: August 24, 2010, 06:55:52 AM »
Speechless....
So, ah... are those real or did ya buy them...?

*

Dr_Fashizzle

  • Fizzle Cup
  • 2671
  • Occupation: Muthafuckin Hustler
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #385 on: August 25, 2010, 07:04:40 PM »
That sofa is a busty lady magnet.  ;)
Woah... I just got goosebumps!  :o

*

MasterDragonfly

  • Oh My God Cup
  • 8040
  • sponsor of collared_cherri's 1000cc implants
    • Larger Implants Info
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #386 on: August 27, 2010, 08:26:05 AM »
I don't know how I missed this thread until now.

Since I started at the end and worked my way back to the beginning, I'll throw my $0.02 into the ring.

I agree with the hypothesis that she may have gotten the string implants.  I don't agree that she did it for the attention.  I also agree that it may be the lucky hormonal lottery.

Not everyone who got string implants was an adult entertainer.  One of our own (who shall remain nameless, unless she decides to speak up) has a friend who got string implants some years back (and not from Dr J, although her surgeon learned the technique from Dr J).  As I understand it, this friend was a regular gal, and had nothing to do with the adult entertainment industry.  (Epilogue:  Alas, this woman eventually ended up switching out for conventional implants.  I don't recall why; I would need to ask the nameless one.)

Point being, if NQ did get the strings, it was likely because she was sold on some aspect of them being superior to conventional implants.  And no doubt she got a more modest quantity of string than the legendary CC.

*

Milkmaniac

  • E Cup
  • 288
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #387 on: August 27, 2010, 10:47:33 AM »
I don't know how I missed this thread until now.

Since I started at the end and worked my way back to the beginning, I'll throw my $0.02 into the ring.

I agree with the hypothesis that she may have gotten the string implants.  I don't agree that she did it for the attention.  I also agree that it may be the lucky hormonal lottery.

Not everyone who got string implants was an adult entertainer.  One of our own (who shall remain nameless, unless she decides to speak up) has a friend who got string implants some years back (and not from Dr J, although her surgeon learned the technique from Dr J).  As I understand it, this friend was a regular gal, and had nothing to do with the adult entertainment industry.  (Epilogue:  Alas, this woman eventually ended up switching out for conventional implants.  I don't recall why; I would need to ask the nameless one.)

Point being, if NQ did get the strings, it was likely because she was sold on some aspect of them being superior to conventional implants.  And no doubt she got a more modest quantity of string than the legendary CC.

Dr. J is doing breast implants?
To BE or not to BE; What was the question?

*

rackonteur

  • D Cup
  • 1200
  • Finally got some whitening strips for my bluetooth
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #388 on: August 28, 2010, 01:47:18 AM »
Dr. J is doing breast implants?
Yes. Yes, he is.

He will also simonize your car, if you ask really nicely.
Yes, well, erm, ahh, hmmm, uh, um, ...eh?

*

jinx

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 8
Re: Nancy Quill
« Reply #389 on: August 29, 2010, 03:13:55 PM »
that kid in pic is her son who starts college this weekend. Not under 18. BTW, she removed the one pic of her on the beach in the purple top from her social networking site. I'm a friend and the others are there, but not that one. Embarrassed?

Mod edit: Hey jinx, the Owner of this site set up rules (that have kept it online for 15 years) and those rules state that if someone in a photo LOOKS like they MIGHT be underag3 then that photo can't be posted here, period. Claims made about the age of the subject made by you, or me or even someone claiming to BE the subject themselves are MOOT. So: no, no one is 'embarrassed' ...this is a private club and everyone who participates here (you, me, everyone) has signed a contract with the Owner to join. That contract obligates everyone to abide by the rules. -Palomine
« Last Edit: August 29, 2010, 05:22:14 PM by Palomine »