*

oldnisvan

  • A Cup
  • 60
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2535 on: March 19, 2015, 09:07:31 AM »
those fund raising pictures simonah posted are actually kind of neat;
it's good to see her in a setting where she's not posing for the camera
and not holding a can of soup in front of her gargantuas

*

mariomantwo

  • A Cup
  • 531
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2536 on: March 26, 2015, 05:54:17 PM »
I wonder if Nancy will attend the event this year. Hopefully in another knockout dress... It's still 6 weeks away
« Last Edit: March 26, 2015, 06:32:15 PM by mariomantwo »

*

oldnisvan

  • A Cup
  • 60
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2537 on: March 28, 2015, 01:56:28 PM »
the line of demarcation gets higher and higher
« Last Edit: March 28, 2015, 02:03:21 PM by nisvan »

*

mariomantwo

  • A Cup
  • 531
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2538 on: March 28, 2015, 02:32:02 PM »
Nancy deleted her swimsuit and red/pink tanktop pics from her FB fan page. I'm honestly surprised she didn't do this sooner. So many dumb comments (on her page). Congrats, guys! You ruined a great thing!
« Last Edit: March 28, 2015, 02:39:00 PM by mariomantwo »

*

dolt

  • B Cup
  • 378
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2539 on: March 29, 2015, 11:41:57 AM »
Agreed.

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2540 on: March 29, 2015, 11:59:56 AM »
Nancy deleted her swimsuit and red/pink tanktop pics from her FB fan page. I'm honestly surprised she didn't do this sooner. So many dumb comments (on her page). Congrats, guys! You ruined a great thing!

No idea who exactly you're directing your comment towards, but in case you weren't aware, when something's posted generally/publicly online, about TWO AND A HALF BILLION people can respond to it if they choose to do so. So you might note that your scorn really should be directed to about a third of Earth's population, and not just us "guys" here, most of whom have demonstrated their respectful behavior regarding Ms. Quill.  ::)

*

Rad

  • E Cup
  • 1302
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2541 on: March 29, 2015, 12:14:39 PM »
That's funny Palomine.

*

titorteat

  • A Cup
  • 1355
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2542 on: March 29, 2015, 12:47:42 PM »
No idea who exactly you're directing your comment towards, but in case you weren't aware, when something's posted generally/publicly online, about TWO AND A HALF BILLION people can respond to it if they choose to do so. So you might note that your scorn really should be directed to about a third of Earth's population, and not just us "guys" here, most of whom have demonstrated their respectful behavior regarding Ms. Quill.  ::)


My interpretation is that mariomantwo was refering to the "guys" that made the disrespectful comments on Nancy's page.
|titor|

*

mariomantwo

  • A Cup
  • 531
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2543 on: March 29, 2015, 01:15:18 PM »
My interpretation is that mariomantwo was refering to the "guys" that made the disrespectful comments on Nancy's page.

Yes, titorteat, you are correct. Sorry if my comments were confusing, Palomine.
« Last Edit: March 29, 2015, 01:17:16 PM by mariomantwo »

*

Palomine

  • Moderator
  • 24024
  • Modern Male Mammal, Linux enthusiast.
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2544 on: March 29, 2015, 01:22:34 PM »
Yes, titorteat, you are correct. Sorry if my comments were confusing, Palomine.

No apology necessary... I know it sounded like it, but I wasn't really directing snark at you personally. If I have any snark to direct, it'd be (of course) at rude f@cks who talk sh!t towards women who post online, causing some women to reduce their posting, but (yes, sadly/realistically) also towards anyone who posts pix of themselves online and naively expects NOT to have to deal with some rude f@cks. Even if 1/1,000th of 1% of 2.4 billion internet users look at a post, and if just 1% of THEM bother to post an unpleasant comment, that's still a LOT of unpleasant comments that even the most photogenic person is going to have to deal with. It's beyond foolish (IMO) to post in public (i.e.: most all posting, including everything posted on any social media site no matter the privacy settings) and delude oneself into thinking all that you're ever going to get is praise.
« Last Edit: March 29, 2015, 06:52:48 PM by Palomine »

*

mariomantwo

  • A Cup
  • 531
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2545 on: March 29, 2015, 01:31:44 PM »
and delude oneself into thinking all that you're ever going to get is praise.
Well, technically one might say it was praise, just not the kind she might want on her official public fan page that her friends, family, and co-workers can see. Might've be foolish on her part not to expect that, maybe just optimistic, but the end result is that she deleted her pics and is less likely to make similar posts in the future thanks to these inappropriate comments.

Mod edit: that's all true of course, but there's nothing you nor I nor Nancy herself can do about any of it. I just think it's silly to expect to post pix and not get some negative responses, especially if what you're posting is even one iota outside of the generic/lowest-common-denominator/mainstream ideals of beauty/normalcy/appropriateness. -Pal
« Last Edit: March 29, 2015, 02:15:07 PM by Palomine »

*

bugla

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 33
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2546 on: March 29, 2015, 02:26:22 PM »
Hey Guys, the real point is... that Nancy posted cool pics that we, in this community enjoy seeing... If one of us makes a comment on her FB page, it brings attention to the picture/posting... Nancy, her coworkers, husband etc are likely to talk about...and if the talk about the comment is outside of "Nancy's social norms", the picture might be removed in order to maintain her "social norms".

Long story short... If you like her pics... Keep you mouth shut, and simply enjoy.  If you wish to make comments... Make them here in the BEA... not on her Fac@book page... Idoit!   :-X


*

titorteat

  • A Cup
  • 1355
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2547 on: March 29, 2015, 03:15:12 PM »
I hope Nancy continues to carry herself with pride and contentment despite a few lewd comments, and maybe even posts some pictures that manifest her exquisite form. She does still have the red tanktop pic on her Twitter at least (with some colourful comments ::)).
|titor|

*

Robin_K2

  • A Cup
  • 3443
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2548 on: March 29, 2015, 03:37:04 PM »
If you wish to make comments... Make them here in the BEA... not on her Fac@book page... Idoit!   :-X

And of course -- as I'm sure you mean -- please keep it respectful here, as well.

*

bugla

  • A Cup
  • *
  • 33
Re: Nancy Quill (MERGED)
« Reply #2549 on: March 29, 2015, 04:04:43 PM »
All comments... should be respectful... There is no reason for disrespect, when our Sweet Nancy (or anyone else for that matter) is being
commented on... here in the BEA... 8)